DOCSLIB.ORG

The Metropolitan Governance Process in Greater Baltimore

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Metropolitan Governance Process in Greater Baltimore PRELIMINARY DRAFT REPORT Engendering Innovative Urban Strategies in a New Regionalism Era: The Metropolitan Governance Process in Greater Baltimore Eric Champagne INRS- Urbanisation Montreal International Urban Fellow Report Institute for Policy Studies Johns Hopkins University Baltimore November 10,1999 Eric Champagne PhD. Candidate Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS-urbanisat ion) Universitk du Quebec 3465, rue Durocher Montrkal (Qukbec) Canada H2X 2C6 Telephone: (5 14) 499-4078 Fax: (5 14) 499-4065 E-Mail: eric-champagne@inr s-urb .uquebec.ca .. 11 Table of Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1. A Portrait of Industrial City Regions: Problems and Concepts ................................................................................ 6 1.1 The Urban Restructuring Process (structuralfactors) ............................................................................................... 7 1.1.1 Economic restructuring ..................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1.2 Globalization process ...................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1.3 Spatial transformation of city regions ............................................................................................................. 14 1.2 The New Configuration of Political Power (institutionalfactors) ............................................................................ 20 1.2.1 Fragmentation of local politico-institutional power ........................................................................................ 20 1.2.2 Transformation of the role of central governments ......................................................................................... 23 1.2.3 Continuous rise of social capital in urban affairs ............................................................................................ 25 2 . A Contemporary Theoretical Framework for Metropolitan Governance.............................................................. 28 2.1 The New Regionalism School .................................................................................................................................... 28 2.1.1 The metropolitan interdependence hypothesis ................................................................................................ 28 2.1.2 The global market argument: toward more competitive regions ..................................................................... 30 2.1.3 The sustainable development argument: a new vision for growth ................................................................... 31 2.1.4 The new regionalism: a socially constructed process ...................................................................................... 33 2.2 The Metropolitan Governance Process .................................................................................................................... 37 2.2.1 The current use of the term governance .......................................................................................................... 37 2.2.2 The metropolitan governance concept ............................................................................................................. 38 2.2.3 The conceptual framework of metropolitan governance ................................................................................. 39 3. Political and Statistical Picture of Greater Baltimore .............................................................................................. 42 3.1 Greater Baltimore Local Government Structure ...................................................................................................... 42 3.2 A statistical picture of Greater Baltimoreis jurisdictions ......................................................................................... 44 ... 111 4. Earlier Stage of Regionalism in Greater Baltimore .................................................................................................. 50 4 . I The Regional Planning Council .RPC (1963-1987) ................................................................................................ 50 4.2 The Baltimore Regional Council of Governments . BRCOG (I 987-1991) .............................................................. 56 4.3 The Baltimore Metropolitan Council .BMC (Since 1992) ....................................................................................... 58 4.4 Earlier Stage of Regionalism in Greater Baltimore: An Appraisal .......................................................................... 60 5 . Regional Impulses for Metropolitan Governance in Greater Baltimore ................................................................ 64 5 .I The Part of Urban Restructuring .............................................................................................................................. 65 5.2 The Initial Reports on Metropolitan Issues ............................................................................................................... 68 5.2.1 Baltimore 2000 ................................................................................................................................................ 70 5.2.2 Baltimore and Beyond - Breaking the Boundaries .......................................................................................... 72 5.2.3 Baltimore Unbound ......................................................................................................................................... 75 5.2.4 Baltimore Metropolitics .................................................................................................................................. 80 5.3 The Regional Planning Agency as a Metropolitan Incubator ................................................................................... 84 6. Development of a Regional Vision in Greater Baltimore ......................................................................................... 86 6.1 Nonprofit Organizations‘ Regional Programs .......................................................................................................... 86 6.1.1 Greater Baltimore Committee (GBC) .............................................................................................................. 87 6.1.1.1 GBC’s initial focus ..................................................................................................................................... 87 6.1.1.2 GBC’s regional agenda ............................................................................................................................... 90 6.1.2 Citizens Planning and Housing Association (CPHA) ...................................................................................... 94 6.1.2.1 CPHA’s initial focus ................................................................................................................................... 95 6.1.2.2 CPHA’s regional agenda ............................................................................................................................ 96 6.1.3 Baltimore Archdiocese .................................................................................................................................. 102 6.1.3.1 Baltimore Archdiocese’s regional agenda ................................................................................................ 103 6.2 Other Commitments towards Regionalism .............................................................................................................. 104 6.2.1 The media’s implication in the debate over regionalism ............................................................................... 105 6.2.2 The Maryland Smart Growth Initiative ......................................................................................................... 108 6.2.3 Strategic planning process in Baltimore City and Howard County ............................................................... 113 6.2.3.1 PlanBaltimore ........................................................................................................................................... 113 6.2.3.2 Howard County Strategic Planning .......................................................................................................... 116 iv 7. Design and Implementation of Metropolitan Governance: Regional Economic Development Strategies in Greater Baltimore ........................................................................... 122 7. I The Economic Interdependence within Metropolitan Areas ................................................................................... i22 7.2 Foregoing Regional Economic Development Initiatives ......................................................................................... i26 7.2.1 The Regional Planning Council and the General Development Plans ........................................................... 126 7.2.2 Business Organizations for a Unified Economic Development Program ...................................................... 128 7.3 Contemporary Regional Economic Development Strategies .................................................................................. 133 7.3.1 Greater Baltimore Technology Council: An example of an industry group
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IEDC Excellence in Economic Development Awards
    AWARDS IEDC Excellence in Economic Development Awards IEDC’s professional economic development awards Honorary & Leadership Awards will be presented recognize excellence in the economic development at the Recognition Dinner on Monday, September profession. These prestigious awards honor 19 from 6:30 P.M. – 9:00 P.M. at the Mint Museum individuals and organizations for their efforts that UPTOWN, 500 South Tryon Street, Charlotte, NC. have created positive change in urban, suburban, and Please note the registration fee of $100. rural communities. Promotional & Program Awards will be presented during the Awards Ceremony on Tuesday, September 20 from 3:45 P.M. – 5:45 P.M. in the Convention Center Ballroom. 91 2011 AWARD CATEGORIES IEDC 2011 ANNUAL CONFERENCE CONFERENCE IEDC 2011 ANNUAL HONORARY & LEADERSHIP AWARDS ...................................................................................92 Fellow Member Designations .................................................................................................................92 Honorary Life Member Designation .......................................................................................................94 New Economic Development Professional of the Year ..........................................................................94 Leadership Award for Public Service ......................................................................................................95 Citizen Leadership Award .......................................................................................................................96
    [Show full text]
  • A Community Views Its Future--Civic
    Baltim"[lnaqrland Metropofitan ("gion A Community Views Its Future Baltim"filnaryland Metropolitan R.gion Civic Leaders' Strategies for Economic Prosperity and Quality of Life in the 2Lst Century A HUD Report on Metropolitan Economic StrategJr U.S. Department of Housing *d Urban Development May L997 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT WASHTNGTON. D.C. 204 t O-OOOI THE SECRETARY In America today, nearly 80 percent of the population and almost 9 0 percent of the employment growth is in metropol it,an regions. We are individuals and families looking to the future for good jobs and business opportunities, for rising incomes to owrr homes, for children to get a worthwhile education, for communities to thrive in health and safety. A11 cf us share a common fate in a new metropolitan economy that will determine our nation' s prosperity and guality of l-if e in the 21-st Century. This New Economy knowledge and informat,ion-based, technology-intensive, and gIobally oriented demands new skills in education, research, and workforce developmenE. To be competitive now reguires regional collaboration and innovative leadership: a Metropolit.an Economic Strategy f or investment in transportation and infrastructure, environmentaL preservation, and community revitalization Our report A Communitv Views fts Future is the resul-t of extensive locai research and interviews, including my recent visit and meetings with metropoliEan leadership. You have told us where you are headed as a region, and how t,he f ederal government can be more helpful in servincr your present and future needs. We have worked with you to identify metropolitan Baltimore' s engrines of prosperity: the industry clusters Lhat can creat.e better j obs and business opportunities .
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Boxers Or Briefs Educate Early, Vote Often by Joshua Levy an Interview with Civicyouth.Org’S Peter Levine Letters to the Editor
    CHAPTER NEWS MEMBER NEWS AND MORE TVNNFS 2008 :PVOH7PUFST "DUJWJTUTBSF3FBEZUPCF)FBSE .JTTJPOUP.BOHV[J QH $BMMFEUP"GSJDB 8F'PVOE0VSTFMWFT CZ#SJDF/JFMTFO 04 .FNPJSTPGB4USFFU.BSDIFS QH 12 .Z"DUJWJTNJO3FUSPTQFDU CZ+PTF%BMJTBZ+S #FZPOE#PYFSTPS#SJFGT "DUJWJTU 5FDI8BUDIFS+PTIVB-FWZ QH 14 5BDLMFT/FX.FEJBBOE1PMJUJDT &EVDBUF&BSMZ 7PUF0GUFO $SVODIJOHUIF/VNCFST QH 18 XJUI$*3$-&µT1FUFS-FWJOF The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the staff of Phi Kappa Phi Forum or the Board of Directors of The Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi. phi kappa phi forum (issn 1538-5914) is published quarterly by The Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi, 7576 Goodwood Blvd., Baton Rouge, la 70806. Printed at R.R. Donnelley, 1160 N. Main, Pontiac, il 61764. the honor society of phi kappa phi was founded in ©The Honor Society of Phi 1897 and became a national organization through the Kappa Phi, 008. All rights efforts of the presidents of three state universities. Its reserved. Non-member primary objective has from the first been the recognition subscriptions $30 per and encouragement of superior scholarship in all fields of year. Single copies $10 study. Good character is an essential supporting attribute each. Periodicals postage for those elected to membership. The motto of the Society paid Baton Rouge, la and additional mailing is phiosophia krateito phótón, which is freely translated as offices. Material intended “Let the love of learning rule humanity.” for publication should be Phi Kappa Phi encourages and recognizes academic addressed to Traci Navarre, excellence through several programs. Through its The Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi, 7576 Goodwood awards and grants programs, the Society each triennium Blvd., Baton Rouge, la 70806.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDA in ACTION Annual Report for FY 2018-19 Letter from MEDA Chairman/CEO and Mayor
    MEDA IN ACTION Annual Report for FY 2018-19 Letter from MEDA Chairman/CEO and Mayor August 2019 Greetings Maricopans, Maricopa is burgeoning, and the prospects for our future have never been brighter! Fiscal Year 2018-19 has brought positive, pivotal change and progress for our great city and our citizens. National name brand retail stores and restaurants have located new facilities in Maricopa. Apex Motor Club broke ground on its motorsports country club. Our Copper Sky Commercial Complex and Estrella Gin Business Park soon will be breaking ground. La Quinta Hotels announced it will be building a hotel in our city. Ak-Chin Harrah’s Hotel and Casino completed its three-year, multi-million dollar renovation and expansion, and marked its 25th anniversary. Our local economy is stable and growing responsibly, and the Maricopa City Councilmembers are committed to ensuring that Maricopa’s business and investment environment supports quality enterprises and jobs. All Maricopans are rightfully proud of this wonderful community they call home. Our residents and businesses have made invaluable contributions to the Maricopa of today — a city that offers an unparalleled, outstanding and safe quality of life; a vibrant spirit of community service, and strong public-private partnerships in which citizens, business, government and education work together to build a strong and diverse local economy and community. The Maricopa-MEDA partnership is a critically important cornerstone to our economic vitality and sustainability. Through the Maricopa Economic Development Alliance, the City of Maricopa and business and education leaders join forces to identify and support promising economic development opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Speakers 2014 Awards Sponsors & Exhibitors
    FAQS | CONTACT | ABOUT IEDC | IEDC HOME | FOLLOW IEDC: ShareShareShareShareMore595 SHARE: More595 REGISTRATION HOTEL & TRAVEL PROGRAM SPEAKERS 2014 AWARDS SPONSORS & EXHIBITORS Program Select the " " icon to learn more about a session or special event. $ = Extra fee event Wednesday, October 15 8:30 am - 5:00 pm Professional Development Course: Economic Development Credit Analysis $ Thursday, October 16 8:30 am - 6:30 pm Professional Development Course: Economic Development Credit Analysis $ Friday, October 17 8:30 am - 4:30 pm Professional Development Course: Economic Development Credit Analysis $ Saturday, October 18 7:00 am - 9:30 pm Certified Economic Developers (CEcD) Exam $ 1:00 pm Golf Tournament at Mira Vista Country Club SOLD OUT 2:30 pm - 5:30 pm More Than Just a Football Stadium: AT&T Stadium Tour $ Sunday, October 19 8:00 am - 7:30 pm Registration 8:00 am - 12:00 pm Explore Fort Worth's Trinity River Vision on Horseback and Wagon (Sunday) $ 10:30 am - 12:30 pm Ethics Workshop 12:00 pm - 1:30 pm Learning Lab A: Master Class: LinkedIn for Economic Developers Learning Lab B: Accelerating Results and Avoiding Dead Ends on Major Projects: New Tools and Methods for Community Stakeholder Alignment 1:00 pm - 7:30 pm Economic Development Marketplace 2:00 pm - 3:30 pm Opening Plenary Session 3:30 pm - 6:00 pm Tour: Bus Tour of AllianceTexas $ 3:45 pm - 5:15 pm Panel Discussions: NAFTA at 20: Capturing Increased Near Shoring Opportunities Driving Value through the New Economics of Place The Energy Play: Fracking and Natural Gas from A-Z
    [Show full text]
  • General Plan Was Partially Funded by a Grant Through the Arizona Department of Commerce
    Acknowledgements The City of Maricopa General Plan was partially funded by a grant through the Arizona Department of Commerce. The following persons and committees were instrumental in preparing the General Plan: City Council Kelly Anderson, Mayor Brent Murphree, Vice-Mayor Stephen Baker Will Dunn Joseph Estes Edward Farrell Kelly Haddad Planning and Zoning Commission Dave Zaiser, Chairman Joe Hoover, Vice-Chairman Marquisha Griffin, Commissioner Dale Jones, Commissioner Rebecca Molus, Commissioner Anthony Smith, Commissioner Kevin Treacy, Commissioner General Plan Advisory Team Kelly Anderson, Mayor David Aviles, Citizen and Member of Parks, Recreation and Libraries Committee Jim Chaston, Citizen and School Board Member Edward Farrell, Councilmember Amy Haberbosch-Arco, Planning Director Bob Jackson, Public Works Director Ioanna Morfessis, Economic Development Consultant Kathy Paulsen, Citizen and Elections Worker Brandy Schade, Planner I Phyllis Von Fleckinger, former Councilmember Jackie Guthrie, Former Volunteer to the Maricopa Planning Committee Citizens Advisory Committee Anita Bracken Debra Edwards Nichol Delulio Ernest Henson Ron Hollingsworth Aaron Ross Joe Stuart Acknowledgements i Maricopa General Plan The Maricopa General Plan Historical Information Contributor Pat Brock Photos Provided By Sue Groff Betsy Rice David Williams Other Important Contributions Marty McDonald, Parks, Recreation and Libraries Director Consultant Team Willdan David Williams & Associates Acknowledgements ii General Plan Elements Table of Contents I.
    [Show full text]
  • Deluca Lifetime Achievement Award Winners
    Lifetime Achievement Award for Excellence in Economic Development Every year IEDC looks specifically for an individual who has demonstrated consistent, exemplary performance in the economic development profession, leading the execution of projects that have significant impact on revitalizing communities, and playing a major role in shaping and improving the practice of economic development. 2019 Kenneth Dobson, GRI, CSI, FM, HLM This award honors an individual who has been a long-time and influential leader in economic development. Kenneth Dobson, fellow member and honorary life member of the International Economic Development Council (IEDC), has dedicated over 40 years of his career to the field of economic development. As the first African American hired by the National Council for Urban Economic Development (CUED) and among one of the few African Americans working in economic development at the start of his career, Mr. Dobson has been a trailblazer and role model in the field. His experiences traverse boundaries, including cities of all sizes and location, fiscal and economic challenges. Mr. Dobson’s economic development career path began when he was selected as a program manager with the U.S. Conference of Mayors. He was then recruited by Ed DeLuca, Founder of CUED, to be the organization’s Director of Community Advisory Services Division. At CUED, Mr. Dobson helped deliver technical assistance to client cities and regions. In the past forty years, Mr. Dobson has served as Vice President of Commercial Real Estate Development at the Detroit Economic Growth Corporation, Executive Vice President for the Detroit Downtown Development Authority, Senior Vice President of the Kensley Eco-Development Company, and most recently as the Economic Development Administrator of Fulton County, Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • To Learn and Earn F I N a L Arizonans’ Experiences Competing R E P O R T in the Race for Good Jobs 2011
    TO LEARN AND EARN FINAL ARIZONANS’ EXPERIENCES COMPETING REPORT IN THE RACE FOR GOOD JOBS 2011 TO LEARN AND EARN: ARIZONANS’ EXPERIENCES COMPETING IN THE RACE FOR GOOD JOBS 1 Jaime Gutierrez, Chair Jose Martinez University of Arizona Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc. Susan Carlson Everardo Martinez-Inzunza Arizona Business and Education Coalition Arizona Western College Panfilo Contreras Dr. Loui Olivas Arizona School Boards Association Arizona State University Elisa de la Vara Ralph Romero Office of Representative Ed Pastor Arizona Department of Education Dr. Alfredo G. de los Santos, Jr. Dr. Mary Ann Martinez Sanchez Arizona State University Pima Community College Dr. Mark Denke Dr. Laura E. Sujo de Montes Arizona Board of Regents Northern Arizona University Dr. Maria Harper-Marinick Magdalena Verdugo Maricopa Community College District Calli Ollin Academy Aleena M. Hernandez Dr. April L. Osborn, Executive Director Red Star Innovations Arizona Commission for Postsecondary Education Fred Lockhart Kathaerine Johnson, Staff Arizona Private School Association Arizona Commission for Postsecondary Education 2 AMEPAC / Morrison Institute for Public Policy TO LEARN AND EARN ARIZONANS’ EXPERIENCES COMPETING IN THE RACE FOR GOOD JOBS J U L Y 2 0 1 1 PREPARED FOR Arizona Minority Education Policy Analysis Center BY Nancy Welch William Hart Judie Scalise, ESI Richard Toon C. J. Eisenbarth Hager Joseph Garcia Monica Stigler Andrea Whitsett SPONSORED BY Many Arizonans provided their stories and input for this project. Their contributions are appreciated. The support of the funders, participation of AMEPAC members, and insights from April Osborn and Kathaerine Johnson are acknowledged gratefully. ©2011 by the Arizona Board of Regents for and on behalf of Arizona State University and its Morrison Institute for Public Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Growth Strategy
    BALTIMORE CITY ECONOMIC GROWTH STRATEGY Building on Strength Mayor Martin O’Malley Foreword The Baltimore City Economic Development Growth Strategy articulates a powerful vision for eco- nomic growth in Baltimore City and sets out a course to achieve that vision. It expands the tradi- tional definition of economic development and enlists all agencies within City government in a col- laborative effort to promote growth and investment in Baltimore City. The report is designed to be a blueprint for the City and other interested parties. It is not an operational plan. Rather, it empha- sizes the key elements of an economic development strategy and reflects the highest priorities to be addressed in implementing that strategy. Although the substantial physical infrastructure under City government's direct or partial control represents strategic assets that can be leveraged to support economic growth, government alone cannot advance the City's economy. It will take the collective energy, resources, experience, deter- mination and skills of the private sector, universities, hospitals, non-profit organizations, and neigh- borhoods - working with the City government - to create the vital cycle of economic prosperity. The report is organized in five sections. Each section describes an essential and interrelated com- ponent of the strategy. The report starts by articulating the overall purpose and vision of the Growth Strategy. In addition, it discusses the important relationship between recommendations contained in this report and companion strategies focused on cleaner and safer streets and prepar- ing the City's workforce. -2- SECTION I Mount Vernon/Midtown Cultural District Why a Growth Strategy? Intercity Transportation Infrastructure Our Vision Access to East Coast, Washington, DC Three-legged Stool Industry Clusters Clean and Safe Workforce and Public Schools SECTION IV A Desirable Place to Live and Work: SECTION II Targeted Quality of Life and Core Principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Connie Robinson
    48 Most Intriguing Women of Arizona Centennial Legacy Luncheon Program Honorees Processional Narrator Welcome Lin Sue Cooney News Anchor, 12 News National Anthem Redeemed Singing Group Opening Remarks Jeanne Herberger Honorary Chair A Word from the Mayor Mayor Greg Stanton City of Phoenix Invocation Apostle Jannah Scott Deputy Director, Center for Faith-Based Partnerships, U.S. Department of Homeland Security LunchSpeaker Mary Jo West Community Liaison / Video Producer Acknowledgements Connie Robinson and Joy Johnson 48 Women Chair and Vice-Chair Sponsor’s Remarks Steve Rizley Senior Vice-President and General Manager, Cox Communications Arizona Tammy Weinbaum Senior Vice-President and General Manager, American Express Bob Machiz Philanthropist & Community Leader The Honorees Pat McMahon Host AZ TV Special Performance Deborah Lippmann Mega Manicurist and Jazz Singer Keynote Speaker Barbara Barrett Interim President of Thunderbird School of Global Management The Honorees Tara Hitchcock Former Host Good Morning Arizona Student Essay Winners Carlian Dawson, EdD Student Essay Chair Closing Remarks Anne Woosley Executive Director of the Arizona Historical Society Lin Sue Cooney News Anchor, 12 News Dear Honorees, Friends & Guests, Two years ago, I was invited by W. K. Kellogg Foundation to participate in a bold experiment: to take fifteen women from around the world and put them through a yearlong leadership program. The goal was to develop innovative ideas for im- pacting women’s issues globally. At the end of that year, each of us was required to present a project plan on how we would impact our local communities. The plan I submitted has evolved into what we now call: 48 Most Intriguing Women of Arizona—a Centennial Legacy Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognizing Phoenix-Area Women Who Are Leading the Way in Business Recognizing Phoenix-Area Women Who Are Leading the Way In
    Women 2 FEBRUARY 24, 2012 Recognizing Phoenix-area women who are leading the way in business PREMIER SPONSOR: 20 WOMEN IN BUSINESS 2012 PHOENIX BUSINESS JOURNAL February 24, 2012 phoenix.bizjournals.com Hormann Table of CONTENTS Page 24 MeetMee the 2012 Women in Business honorees: Agnello, Lynn ............................. 21 Bucher, Tiffany .......................... 21 Busch, Molly .............................. 21 Cruz, Karen ................................23 De Blasi, Michelle .....................22 Guerra, MaryAnn .....................22 Heasley, Kathy ..........................23 Helt, Anita ................................. 26 Hester, Kerry............................. 24 Hormann, Nancy...................... 24 Karabatsos, Maurine .............. 24 Kassel, Kristine ........................ 26 Lamb, Ginger ............................ 26 Leadley, Lauri .............................27 Martin, Harriet ......................... 28 Nodilo, Patsy .............................28 Lamb Page 26 Busch Page 21 Perry, Tanya .............................. 28 Prusak, Julie ...............................27 Rourke, Patricia ........................ 29 Ruddy, Anne ............................. 29 Spicer, Jane ............................... 30 Timm, Susie .............................. 29 Watson, Sandra ........................ 31 Estrella Timm Page 33 Weinbaum, Tammy .................30 Wolf-Francis, Mary ................. 30 Page 29 Also inside: • Female executives are moving to women fi nancial advisers for guidance..................32 • Local
    [Show full text]
  • City of Scottsdale Page 1 of 31 April 29, 2014 City Council Work Study Session Closed Caption Transcript
    CITY OF SCOTTSDALE PAGE 1 OF 31 APRIL 29, 2014 CITY COUNCIL WORK STUDY SESSION CLOSED CAPTION TRANSCRIPT This document was created from the closed caption transcript of the April 29, 2014 City Council Work Study Session and has not been checked for completeness or accuracy of content. A copy of the agenda for this meeting, including a summary of the action taken on each agenda item, is available online at: http://www.Scottsdaleaz.gov/Assets/Public+Website/Council/Council+Documents/2014+Agendas/0429 14WorkStudyAgenda.pdf An unedited digital video recording of the meeting, which can be used in conjunction with the transcript, is available online at: http://www.Scottsdaleaz.gov/citycable11/channels/Council14. For ease of reference, included throughout the transcript are bracketed “time stamps” [Time: 00:00:00] that correspond to digital video recording time. For more information about this transcript, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 480-312-2411. CALL TO ORDER [Time: 00:00:06] Mayor Lane: It’s approximately 3:00. It is April 29, 2014. We would like to call to order our Work Study Session. ROLL CALL [Time: 00:00:12] Mayor Lane: Start with a roll call, please. Clerk Carolyn Jagger: Mayor Jim Lane. Mayor Lane: Present. Carolyn Jagger: Vice Mayor Virginia Korte. Vice Mayor Korte: Here. Carolyn Jagger: Councilmembers Suzanne Klapp. Councilwoman Klapp: Here. CITY OF SCOTTSDALE PAGE 2 OF 31 APRIL 29, 2014 CITY COUNCIL WORK STUDY SESSION CLOSED CAPTION TRANSCRIPT Carolyn Jagger: Bob Littlefield. Councilman Littlefield: Here. Carolyn Jagger: Linda Milhaven. Councilwoman Milhaven: Here. Carolyn Jagger: Guy Phillips.
    [Show full text]