DOCSLIB.ORG

Critical Assessment of the Relationship Between E-Governance and Democracy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Critical Assessment of the Relationship Between E-Governance and Democracy FRIENDS WITHOUT BENEFITS: Critical Assessment of the Relationship between E-governance and Democracy By Yuliya Makarava A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Media and Communication at Mid Sweden University December 2011 CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................ IV ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................................ V 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2. CONCEPTUALIZING E-GOVERNANCE ....................................................................................................... 7 2.1. FROM GOVERNMENT TO GOVERNANCE ......................................................................................................... 9 2.2. E-GOVERNMENT ..................................................................................................................................... 11 2.3. E-GOVERNANCE ...................................................................................................................................... 14 2.4. E-DEMOCRACY ....................................................................................................................................... 15 2.5. INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK OF E-GOVERNANCE ........................................................................................... 18 3. DEMOCRATIC TEST ................................................................................................................................ 21 3.1. HOW DEMOCRATIC IS GOVERNANCE?......................................................................................................... 21 3.2. HOW DEMOCRATIC IS E-GOVERNANCE? ...................................................................................................... 23 3.3. DAHL’S FIVE CRITERIA .............................................................................................................................. 26 4. E-GOVERNANCE IN A NON-DEMOCRATIC CONTEXT .............................................................................. 30 4.1. NON-DEMOCRATIC REGIMES ..................................................................................................................... 30 4.2. COUNTRIES IN TRANSITION ....................................................................................................................... 32 5. MEASURING E-GOVERNANCE ................................................................................................................ 35 5.1. RESEARCH DESIGN .................................................................................................................................. 36 5.2. MEASURES ............................................................................................................................................ 39 5.3. ANALYTICAL STRATEGY ............................................................................................................................. 44 ii 5.4. FINDINGS .............................................................................................................................................. 45 5.5. DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................................... 54 6. CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................................... 58 APPENDIX....................................................................................................................................................... 62 A. FIVE-STAGE MODEL OF E-GOVERNMENT EVOLUTION ........................................................................................ 62 B. MAIN FEATURES REVIEWED BY THE UNITED NATIONS E-GOVERNMENT SURVEY ..................................................... 63 C. KEY CHANGES IN WEB MEASURE SURVEY METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 64 D. METHODOLOGY FOR E-PARTICIPATION INDEX ................................................................................................... 66 E. OPERATIONAL INDICATORS OF DEMOCRACY AND AUTOCRACY ............................................................................... 67 F. DEMOCRACY INDEX AND E-GOVERNMENT INDEX IN 2003 AND 2008 FOR 151 COUNTRIES ....................................... 68 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................... 72 iii LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Key differences among E-concepts ............................................................................ 18 Table 2.The average level of e-government development and democracy .............................. 46 Table 3. Spearman's correlation matrix and partial correlation controlling for infrastructure development index for 151 countries ....................................................................................... 48 Table 4. Spearman's correlation matrix and partial correlation for democratic countries ....... 49 Table 5. Spearman's correlation for non-democratic countries ................................................ 50 Table 6. Correlations for transitioning countries ..................................................................... 51 Table 7. The average level of e-government development in democratic and non-democratic countries ................................................................................................................................... 52 Table 8. The average level of e-participation and web presence in democratic and non- democratic countries ................................................................................................................ 53 iv ABSTRACT New information and communication technologies are often viewed as a panacea to the current crisis of representative democracy. The growing number of publications on the democratization effects of the use of new information and communication technologies (ICT) in governance focuses on social media and emerging online public spheres. This thesis examines the democratic potential of ICT from the supply side represented by the concepts of e-governance and e-government. In the context of destabilization of political communication system, e-governance as a top-down initiative has a better chance to serve as a congregative force formalizing institutional procedures between the multi-public spheres and the decision makers and, thus, democratizing political communication. The first part of the thesis pulls together the key concepts of electronic transformation – e-governance, e-government and e- democracy – and analyzes them within a broader context of new governance. The democratic test, based on evaluation against Robert Dahl’s five democratic criteria and democratic deficits of new governance, indicates numerous negative consequences of e-governance for representative democracy. Moreover, implemented in different institutional settings of democratic and non-democratic regimes, e-governance varies in the level of development and impact on political communication and political systems in general. To verify theoretical conclusions empirically, a global study was conducted for two points in time – 2003 and 2008; it examined the relationship between e-governance and democracy controlling for the impact of telecommunication infrastructure development. Hypothesis testing revealed that the level of e-governance development and its correlation with democracy strongly varied in relation to the type of political system. The findings suggest that it is premature to ascribe democratization effects to e-governance disregarding existing institutional settings. Keywords: e-governance, e-government, democracy, political communication infrastructure, new governance v INTRODUCTION 1. INTRODUCTION The role of the media in the process of political change and democratization has not received extensive attention among scholars until recently. Communications media are often assumed to play a minor role in democratization if any, and liberalization of the media is usually interpreted as a by-product rather than a driving force of political change (Lawson, 2002; O’Neil, 1998). However, Blumler and Gurevitch (2001) argue that there is a “need for advanced democracies to ‘get a grip’ on their political communication system arrangements” (p.1) as communication is central to the politics in modern societies. This perspective has entered the academic debate with the emergence and increasing importance of the Internet. Recent social and political changes such as the breakdown of party loyalties, increased electoral volatility, voters’ cynicism and the fragmentation of social orders have made the political communication landscape less manageable and predictable. Both politicians and political journalists have to vigorously compete for access to the public and audiences (Blumler & Gurevitch, 2001). Past experience shows that the introduction of a new and widely accessible medium significantly changes the infrastructure of political communication systems and ideas on how a message can be delivered. The Internet has become
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Direct E-Democracy and Political Party Websites: in the United States and Sweden
    Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Theses 5-1-2015 Direct E-Democracy and Political Party Websites: In the United States and Sweden Kirk M. Winans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses Recommended Citation Winans, Kirk M., "Direct E-Democracy and Political Party Websites: In the United States and Sweden" (2015). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Running head: E-DEMOCRACY AND POLITICAL PARTY WEBSITES Direct E-Democracy and Political Party Websites: In the United States and Sweden by Kirk M. Winans Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Graduation Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Science, Technology and Public Policy Department of Public Policy College of Liberal Arts Rochester Institute of Technology May 1, 2015 E-DEMOCRACY AND POLITICAL PARTY WEBSITES Direct E-Democracy and Political Party Websites: In the United States and Sweden A thesis submitted to The Public Policy Department at Rochester Institute of Technology By Kirk M. Winans Under the faculty guidance of Franz Foltz, Ph.D. Submitted by: Kirk M. Winans Signature Date Accepted by: Dr. Franz Foltz Thesis Advisor, Graduate Coordinator Signature Date Associate Professor, Dept. of STS/Public Policy Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Rudy Pugliese Committee Member Signature Date Professor, School of Communication Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Ryan Garcia Committee Member Signature Date Assistant Professor, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Procedural Democracy, the Bulwark of Equal Liberty Author(S): Maria Paula Saffon and Nadia Urbinati Source: Political Theory, Vol
    Procedural Democracy, the Bulwark of Equal Liberty Author(s): Maria Paula Saffon and Nadia Urbinati Source: Political Theory, Vol. 41, No. 3 (June 2013), pp. 441-481 Published by: Sage Publications, Inc. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23484433 Accessed: 06-05-2020 03:17 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23484433?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Sage Publications, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Political Theory This content downloaded from 202.41.10.30 on Wed, 06 May 2020 03:17:25 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Political Theory 41(3) 441-481 Procedural Democracy, © 2013 SAGE Publications Reprints and permissions: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav the Bulwark of Equal DOI: 10.1177/0090591713476872 Liberty ptx.sagepub.com María Paula Saffon1 and Nadia Urbinati1 Abstract This essay reclaims a political proceduralist vision of democracy as the best normative defense of democracy in contemporary politics.We distinguish this vision from three main approaches that are representative in the current academic debate: the epistemic conception of democracy as a process of truth seeking; the populist defense of democracy as a mobilizing politics that defies procedures; and the classical minimalist or Schumpeterian definition of democracy as a competitive method for selecting leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Associational Life Under Authoritarianism: the Saudi Chamber of Commerce and Industry Elections
    This is a repository copy of Associational Life under Authoritarianism: The Saudi Chamber of Commerce and Industry Elections. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/92453/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Kraetzschmar, HJ (2016) Associational Life under Authoritarianism: The Saudi Chamber of Commerce and Industry Elections. Journal of Arabian Studies, 5 (2). pp. 184-205. ISSN 2153-4764 https://doi.org/10.1080/21534764.2015.1129723 This is an author produced version of a paper published in Journal of Arabian Studies. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Associational Life under Authoritarianism: The Saudi Chamber of Commerce and Industry Elections HENDRIK J. KRAETZSCHMAR Abstract: This article is concerned with the dynamics of internal leadership elections in one of Saudi Arabia’s oldest and most prominent network of professional syndicates, the Chambers of Commerce and Industry (CCIs).
    [Show full text]
  • The Bureaucratic Mentality in Democratic Theory and Contemporary Democracy
    The Bureaucratic Mentality in Democratic Theory and Contemporary Democracy Jennifer M. Hudson Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2016 © 2016 Jennifer M. Hudson All rights reserved ABSTRACT The Bureaucratic Mentality in Democratic Theory and Contemporary Democracy Jennifer M. Hudson This project draws attention to a contemporary exaltation of competence and swift decision-making that emphasizes the moment of executive power in democratic political practice and within democratic theory. Drawing on Weber’s concept of rationalization and his opposition between the mentalities of the official and the politician, I develop a distinct conception of bureaucracy as a mode of thought. Bureaucratic thinking involves the application of technical knowledge and skills, with a claim to universality and objectivity, in order to produce results and promote consensus and social harmony. I argue that this conception allows us to better recognize the contemporary diffusion of a flexible, decentralized type of bureaucracy and situate it within the history of affinity and tension between bureaucratic and democratic principles. I focus on a tradition within continental democratic theory, which tends to downplay politics by replacing it with administration and regulation. French political theorist and historian Pierre Rosanvallon is its contemporary representative, building on Hegel and Durkheim as well as Saint-Simon and Léon Duguit. Initially, Rosanvallon offered a theory of participation and democratic legitimacy that would work within the administrative state, taking into account his own strong critiques of bureaucracy. I argue that significant shifts evident in his later works, which respond to new realities, explicitly and/or implicitly mobilize bureaucratic thinking and practice to buttress democratic legitimacy within the nation-state and the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Islam and Democracy. Can They Co-Exist?
    Advances in Applied Sociology, 2019, 9, 431-445 https://www.scirp.org/journal/aasoci ISSN Online: 2165-4336 ISSN Print: 2165-4328 Islam and Democracy. Can They Co-Exist? Antonello Canzano University “G. d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy How to cite this paper: Canzano, A. Abstract (2019). Islam and Democracy. Can They Co-Exist? Advances in Applied Sociology, In this article one wonders if the union between democracy and Islam is 9, 431-445. possible and in what form. If we consider democracy as a system inspired by https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2019.99032 the universalism of values typical of the West, can this be compatible with the Received: July 15, 2019 values professed by Islam? Through some authors we have tried to under- Accepted: September 9, 2019 stand if there can be compatibility and by virtue of this compatibility to estab- Published: September 12, 2019 lish a possible relationship with the West. This article analyzes in the light of Copyright © 2019 by author(s) and this if there are paths within Islam that make a possible meeting. Hence the Scientific Research Publishing Inc. question: is it possible to discover another Islam that can weave its fates with This work is licensed under the Creative democracy? Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). Keywords http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access Politics, Democracy, Islam 1. Introduction At the end of the last century the democratization processes found their maxi- mum expansion. This was expressed on a global scenario that did not spare even the most remote areas of the planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Years of Supporting Democracy Worldwide © International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2005
    International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance Ten Years of Supporting Democracy Worldwide © International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2005 International IDEA publications are independent of specifi c national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council members. Applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or any part of this publication should be made to: Publications Offi ce International IDEA SE -103 34 Stockholm Sweden International IDEA encourages dissemination of its work and will promptly respond to requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications. Graphic design by: Magnus Alkmar Front cover illustrations by: Anoli Perera, Sri Lanka Printed by: Trydells Tryckeri AB, Sweden ISBN 91-85391-43-3 A number of individuals (and organizations) have contributed to the development of this book. Our thanks go, fi rst and foremost, to Bernd Halling, External Relations Offi cer, who coordinated the content development of this book and for all his hard work and support to the book through its many phases. We also thank Ozias Tungwarara, Senior Programme Offi cer, who developed the concept from the beginning and helped in the initial phase of writing and collection of material, as well as IDEA’s Publications Manager, Nadia Handal Zander for her help in the production of this book. Foreword International IDEA was born in 1995 in a world tions—hence the notion of local ownership of the which was optimistic about democratic change. process of reform and development. For signifi - The end of the Cold War had ushered in a period cant political reforms and public policy decisions, of opportunity and innovation with democracy as there needs to be the space and time for knowl- well as more self-critical analysis of the quality and edge to be shared, for information to be circulated, achievements of democracies, old and new.
    [Show full text]
  • For BA(Hons) Political Science 1St Year DESHBANDHU COLLEGE
    For BA(Hons) Political Science 1st Year DESHBANDHU COLLEGE . Idea and Practice . Liberal Democracy and its critics . Multiculturalism and Toleration Debate : Representation vs participation . The word democracy comes from two Greek words demos and kratos: Demos means the common people andk ratos meansr ule therefore it literally means rule by the people. It is generally believed that democratic government originated in the ‘polis’ or city states of ancient Greece. However, Greek philosophers and historians like Plato, Aristotle and Thucydides have variedly regarded democracy as a poor form of government. The idea and practice of democracy was also present in ancient India in different forms, which need to be explored for example the idea ofS amjnana i nRig Veda orG anas , Samghatagana S, angha V, ajji oVr riji and so on. The Lichhhavis were well-known republics of those times so was the Sakha republic. Some of the famous republics of the Buddhist era were: Vaishali, Mithila and so on. Democracy has been defined in various ways by different scholars including government of the people, by the people and for the people. Thus, Democracy is basically ‘Rule by the People’ through free and fair elections and other forms of participation. However, Elections in themselves do not fulfil the requirement of modern democracies; it must also be free, fair, and sufficientlyf requent if the People’s will is to have effect. Liberal democracy recognizes the moral primacy of the individual and thata ll persons have certain fundamental rights such as Freedom, Equality, and Dignity of the individual. A central purpose of democracy is to protect these rights in the practical world of everyday life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Everyday Democracy Index
    The EverydayThe Democracy Index What are the most democratic countries in Europe? ‘‘We need to dig deeper How would we find out? This pamphlet sets out to answer these questions through a new approach to comparing the democratic health of nations: the Everyday Democracy than voter turnout to Index (EDI). The EDI attempts to measure the lived experience of democracy in 25 European countries. It takes as its starting point the idea that this experience is find out how European only partially defined by what happens in the traditional arenas of elections and formal politics. The pamphlet democracies really demonstrates that how effectively countries empower individuals in more everyday spheres like families, | communities, workplaces and public services makes a big SkidmorePaul · Kirsten Bound measure up...’’ difference to the health of their formal democracy. It also shows that the strength of Everyday Democracy is very closely related to levels of life satisfaction, social trust, and social and gender equality. THE EVERYDAY Paul Skidmore is a Demos Associate, and a McConnell DEMOCRACY INDEX Fellow and MPA candidate at Princeton University’s Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. Kirsten Bound is a senior researcher at Demos. Paul Skidmore Kirsten Bound ISBN 978-1-84180-193-3 £10 © Demos 2008 Who we are Demos is the think tank for everyday democracy. We believe everyone should be able to make personal choices in their daily lives that contribute to the common good. Our aim is to put this democratic idea into practice by working with organisations in ways that make them more effective and legitimate.
    [Show full text]
  • La Porta U.S
    Islam and Democracy in Indonesia Alphonse F. La Porta U.S. Ambassador, retired (February 26, 2008) hy talk about Indonesia? There are four major reasons: W 1. Indonesia is the world’s largest, least understood country (according to former Congressman Jim Leach, chair of the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on East Asia and the Pacific). 2. Indonesia is a striving democracy and its survival is important not only for Southeast Asia stability but also for United States and Western interests and values. 3. Indonesia is undergoing a “struggle for the soul of Islam” over the role of religion in society. That this debate is occurring is positive and is contributing to the de-legitimization of radical and violent Islamism. 4. Indonesia is an exemplar for Muslim majority countries outside the Middle East. I have three takeaway concepts I wish for you to learn from today’s discussion: 1. Democracy is succeeding in Indonesia; it is imperfect but is evolving and consolidating. 2. There is “pushback” against Islamic extremism. Indonesia’s multicultural, multiethnic, syncretic and forbearing society is coalescing to defeat religious radicalism, but it will be a long process. 3. Indonesian society is complex; there is no convenient or easy assessment. Indonesia is very important to the United States. There are good prospects for building a strong cooperative relationship with Indonesia based on improved and deeper understanding on both sides. DIFFERING IMAGES OF INDONESIA 19 | Juniata Voices Seth Mydans, in the New York Times of January 12, 2008, presented a positive picture, saying: From one of the most centralized and controlled countries….[Indonesia] has transformed itself into one of the most decentralized, free, open and self-regulating.
    [Show full text]
  • The Circumstances of Democracy: an Investigation of Global Constitutionalist Scholarship
    Durham E-Theses The Circumstances of Democracy: An Investigation of Global Constitutionalist Scholarship HOUGHTON, RUTH,ALICE How to cite: HOUGHTON, RUTH,ALICE (2018) The Circumstances of Democracy: An Investigation of Global Constitutionalist Scholarship, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12539/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 The Circumstances of Democracy: An Investigation of Global Constitutionalist Scholarship Ruth Alice Houghton A thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Durham Law School University of Durham October 2017 1 The Circumstances of Democracy: An Investigation of Global Constitutionalist Scholarship Ruth Alice Houghton Abstract A conceptual understanding of democracy is missing from global constitutionalist discourse. Whilst there are heated debates on the plausibility of transferring democracy to governance systems beyond the state, the discourse lacks grounding in democratic theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Democracy in the European Union
    LundUniversity SVT004 DepartmentofPoliticalScience Autumn2004 Supervisor:MatsSjölin DefiningDemocracyintheEuropeanUnion Assessingtheprocedureandthesubstance JohannaSeverinsson Abstract Theaimofmyessayistolookattheorganizationofdemocracyataninternational level,herewithintheEuropeanUnion.Bylookingatthedemocraticorganisationof the European Constitutional draft and the relation between procedural and substantive directives of democracy therein I am able to see what political behaviour the Constitution expresses in turns of creating a “government for the people” or a “government by the people”. By using historical, empirical and internationalinstitutionalismasatheoreticalframeworkIalsosetouttoanalysethe impact democratic conditions have had on the relation between substantive and proceduraldirectivesintheEuropeanConstitutionaldraft.Myfindingswherethat theproceduraldirectivesareflexibleandthesubstantivedirectivesnotspecifiedbut left for interpretation and adjustments to conditions and traditions inthe member states.Ialsofoundthattheconstitutionsetouttomeetsereraldemocraticproblems describedwithincontemporarydemocraticthinkingi.e.“thepowertoact”.Inorder tosalvecontemporarydemocraticproblemsthereisaneedtolookattherelation betweensubstantiveandproceduralapproachestodemocracy. Keywords:EuropeanUnion,Proceduraldemocracy,Substantivedemocracy, Democraticconditions,NewInstitutionslism. 1 TableofContent 1.INTRODUCTION __________________________________________________ 4 1.2MotiveforChoiceofSubject
    [Show full text]
  • DEGREES of DEMOCRACY Some Comparative Lessons from India
    DEGREES OF DEMOCRACY Some Comparative Lessons from India By PATRICK HELLER* INTRODUCTION NE of the most remarkable developments of the late twentieth Ocentury has been the number of countries that have made the transition from authoritarian to democratic rule. Even if, following Linz and Stepan,1 one employs an exacting definition of democratic consolidation, there are far more countries today in which democracy is the only game in town than was the case just fifteen years ago. This development has in turn produced an empirically and theoretically rich literature on democratic transitions and consolidation. But if we have learned much about the conditions and processes under which the tran- sition to democracy takes place, we have only just begun to scratch the surface of the equally challenging question of the effectiveness of democ- racy in the posttransition period. As Linz and Stepan note, beyond the consolidation of democracies there is room to improve their quality by raising the minimum economic plateau upon which all citizens stand and by deepening political and social participation in the life of the country. Within the category of consolidated democracies there is a contin- uum from low to high quality democracy; an urgent political and intellectual task is to think about how to improve the quality of most consolidated democracies.2 This paper takes up this challenge by drawing on the case of India, which is of particular significance for theories of democratic deepening on two counts. First, the general picture of Indian democracy stands as a reminder that there is no linear progression to democracy.
    [Show full text]