First Records of the Sponge Crab Dromia Personata (Brachyura) in the Netherlands and Its Historical Findings in the North Sea Godfried W

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

First Records of the Sponge Crab Dromia Personata (Brachyura) in the Netherlands and Its Historical Findings in the North Sea Godfried W van Moorsel et al. Marine Biodiversity Records (2017) 10:28 DOI 10.1186/s41200-017-0129-7 MARINE RECORD Open Access First records of the sponge crab Dromia personata (Brachyura) in the Netherlands and its historical findings in the North Sea Godfried W. N. M. van Moorsel1*, Floris P. Bennema2 and Reindert Nijland3 Abstract Only a few records exist of the sponge crab Dromia personata in the North Sea. Most records are in local languages, and have limited availability. On 11 August 2016, D. personata was found by divers in the Eastern Scheldt, a former estuary in the south-western part of the Netherlands. In the months to follow, at least four other individuals were observed by divers at the same and nearby locations. This paper lists these and former records in the North Sea. The distribution pattern, and the possible migration of the sponge crab in relation to environmental conditions such as seawater temperature are discussed, as well as the crab’s use of the non-native sponge Celtodoryx ciocalyptoides. Keywords: Sponge crab, Dromia personata, North Sea, Southern species, Distribution expansion Background off the Belgian coast (Pelseneer 1881). In 1912, D. perso- Geographic distribution: Dromia personata (Linnaeus, nata was caught in the vicinity of the ‘Galloper’ light 1758) is known from the Mediterranean Sea, and in the vessel off the Essex coast (Patterson 1913). Leloup East Atlantic Ocean from Western Sahara, Ascension, (1941) lists a record from 1937 near the Sandettie Bank Azores and Canary Islands, north to Anglesey (Wales), at 19–20 fathoms (35–37 m). This bank lies north of the Clyde Sea (Scotland) and the English Channel. North Calais, in what is now the French part of the North Sea. Sea records are rare (see below and Fig. 1). Records from A footnote in Leloup (1941) mentions two more speci- São Tomé, Senegal, Cabo Verde and Madeira and pos- mens, also from 1937, caught at the White Bank, the sibly also St. Helena refer to Dromia marmorea Forrest, now submerged west bank of the Elbe glacial valley. Al- 1974 (Christiansen 1969; Manning and Holthuis 1981; though this area is 170 km west of Denmark, it lies just Wolff 2002; Ashton et al. 2017; Allen 1967; González east of 6° latitude, and was therefore considered to be- 2016; González et al. 2017; Araújo and Wirtz 2015; De long to the Danish fauna (Wolff 2002). The rectangular Grave et al. 2017). Morphological differences between D. area specified in Leloup (1941) presently lies in the Ger- personata and D. marmorea are discussed in Manning & man part of the North Sea (Fig. 1) and is roughly equi- Holthuis (1981). In British waters, the sponge crab has distant from the Dutch, German and Danish coast. The been recorded infrequently. In Ireland, the first speci- designation of the latitude in the footnote in Leloup mens of D. personata were caught only recently, in 2010 (1941) in multiples of 15′ suggests a possible error in and 2011 (Quigley and O'Donovan 2013). the eastern longitude: it is probably not E 6°3′ but E 6° Only a few records of sponge crabs from the North 30′. This also better fits the location of the White Bank, Sea exist (Fig. 1). In 1824, two specimens were found at at approximately N 55°10′ and E 6°10′. The last speci- Billingsgate Market (London) among oysters from Whit- fied site in the North Sea, in 1953, is the Fairy Bank stable Bay (Anonymous 1824); this was the first record (Adema 1981) in the French part of the North Sea. In from the United Kingdom (Bell 1853). Another speci- addition, Ingle (1983) mentions the Wash and Thames men was caught in 1880 ‘in deep water of the open sea’ as North Sea locations. The latter record is possibly also included in Adema (1991), which shows three locations * Correspondence: [email protected] at the English North Sea coast, off Kent and Norfolk. 1ecosub, P.O. Box 126, 3940 AC Doorn, The Netherlands Leloup & Gills (1965) report D. personata from shrimp Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. van Moorsel et al. Marine Biodiversity Records (2017) 10:28 Page 2 of 5 Fig. 1 Records of Dromia personata in the southern North Sea. Locations of records in the southern North Sea with boundaries of national continental flats and year of catch or observation where available. Grey symbols from Adema (1991). Left part of rectangle in the German part of the North Sea is the area of two catches in 1937 as mentioned in Leloup (1941); whole rectangle (including interrupted line) is probable area of occurrence (see text) catches during 1949–1964, in a 25 km long strip inside Results the 5-mile (9 km) zone from the Belgian coast between In 2016, several individuals of Dromia personata were Middelkerke and Wenduine. They call the crab as being found in the Eastern Scheldt, and these constituted ‘assez rare’, the one but lowest of their four abundance the first records in the Netherlands. One was found categories, which suggests the catch of at least several on 11 August 2016, and was taken from its location specimens. Coordinates of the above-mentioned historic (Zeelandbrug: 51° 37′ 44″ N, 3° 54′ 49″ E). Subse- North Sea records are listed in Table 1. quently, at least 12 times between 14 August and 30 October 2016, D. personata was recorded (but not collected) again at the same location. The maximum Methods number of sponge crabs observed per dive was two. New records in the Netherlands emerged by observa- Consequently, a minimum number of three individ- tions made via SCUBA diving. The first Dutch record uals must have been present at the Zeelandbrug. The of Dromia personata was posted on 16 August 2016 on relatively high number of records at this location may the internet (NatureToday.com) and prompted other reflect the popularity of this dive site. In addition, biologists and diving naturalists to search for the spe- two more sponge crabs were found in the Eastern cies. This resulted in findings that were sometimes ac- Scheldt, at Strijenham (51° 31′ 17″ N, 4° 08′ 28″ E) companied by underwater photos (Fig. 2) or video. As and Goesse Sas (51° 32′ 32″ N, 3° 55′ 52″ E). Con- such, this paper shows the valuable contribution of citi- sideringthedistancebetweentheselocationsandthe zen science (Thiel et al. 2014). Due to its sponge cover timing it is highly unlikely that these records repre- D. personata is well camouflaged, but once found it sented the same individuals. Therefore, a total of at was easily recognized and could not be confused with least five sponge crabs must have been present in the other brachyurans. Eastern Scheldt in 2016. van Moorsel Table 1 Dromia personata. Historic catches and recent observations in the North Sea et al. Marine Biodiversity Records Date Name in reference Location Depth n Sex Carapace width Reference Co-ordinate Remark (x length) NE 1824 D. mediterranea, Whitstable Bay Anonymous Found among Oysters from Leach 1824 Whitstable Bay at Billingsgate market, London. Communicated by Mr. J.E. Gray and presented at June 22, 1824 1880 D. vulgaris Edw. deep water in open sea off deep 1 almost Pelseneer ?? the Belgian coast 110 mm 1881 late Dec. 1912 D. vulgaris ‘Galloper’ light-vessel Patterson 51° 43,9’ 001° 57,8’ Taken by the Lowestoft (2017)10:28 1913 sailing-trawler ‘Giralda’, skipper J. Stead. Specimen presented by Mr. F.C. Cook. Co-ordinate from internet 29–05-1937 D. vulgaris Milne Sandettie bank (SW-end) 19–20 fathom 1 ♀ 50 × 40 mm Leloup 1941 51° 11′ 30” 001° 52’ Dredged. Sandettie Bank rises Edwards =35–37 m up to −20 m, so catch must have been next to this bank. Specimen presented by Cyriel Pecceu, Nieuwpoort June 1937 D. vulgaris Milne White Bank ~30 m 2 ♀ 40 × 35 & Leloup 1941 NW 55° 15′ 006° 00′ Reported by letter 22 June, Edwards 85 × 65 mm footnote SE 54° 30’ 006° 3′ 1937 by Cyriel Pecceu, Nieuwpoort 1949 to 1964 D. vulgaris H. Milne- within 5 nautical miles from >1? Leloup and Bycatch experimental shrimp Edwards the Belgian coast between Gilis 1965 fishery. Middelkerke & Wenduine abundance cat. (3) = ‘assez rare’ 16–12-1953 D. personata approximately near Fairy 1 ♀ Adema 1981, NW 51° 24′ 00” 002° 18′ 30″ In collection Royal Belgian (Linnaeus, 1758) bank 1991 SE 51° 21′ 10” 002° 22′ 10″ Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels ? D. personata 2 locations Kent coast and Adema 1991: (Linnaeus, 1758) 1 location Norfolk coast map 1 Wash and Thames Ingle 1983 11–08 to 30–10 D. personata 16 records at 3 location in 3–13 m ≥5 ♂ & ♀ ~ 55 mm this study see text 2016 (Linnaeus, 1758) Eastern Scheldt, Netherlands 09–04 to 02–08 D. personata 3 records at 2 location in 4–7m ≥2 this study see text 2017 (Linnaeus, 1758) Eastern Scheldt, Netherlands Page 3 of 5 van Moorsel et al. Marine Biodiversity Records (2017) 10:28 Page 4 of 5 individuals within 1 year has happened before: in 1824 two specimens were found, and in 1937 3 specimens were reported.
Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • National Monitoring Program for Biodiversity and Non-Indigenous Species in Egypt
    UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTRE FOR SPECIALLY PROTECTED AREAS National monitoring program for biodiversity and non-indigenous species in Egypt PROF. MOUSTAFA M. FOUDA April 2017 1 Study required and financed by: Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat BP 337 1080 Tunis Cedex – Tunisie Responsible of the study: Mehdi Aissi, EcApMEDII Programme officer In charge of the study: Prof. Moustafa M. Fouda Mr. Mohamed Said Abdelwarith Mr. Mahmoud Fawzy Kamel Ministry of Environment, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) With the participation of: Name, qualification and original institution of all the participants in the study (field mission or participation of national institutions) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Acknowledgements 4 Preamble 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chapter 2: Institutional and regulatory aspects 40 Chapter 3: Scientific Aspects 49 Chapter 4: Development of monitoring program 59 Chapter 5: Existing Monitoring Program in Egypt 91 1. Monitoring program for habitat mapping 103 2. Marine MAMMALS monitoring program 109 3. Marine Turtles Monitoring Program 115 4. Monitoring Program for Seabirds 118 5. Non-Indigenous Species Monitoring Program 123 Chapter 6: Implementation / Operational Plan 131 Selected References 133 Annexes 143 3 AKNOWLEGEMENTS We would like to thank RAC/ SPA and EU for providing financial and technical assistances to prepare this monitoring programme. The preparation of this programme was the result of several contacts and interviews with many stakeholders from Government, research institutions, NGOs and fishermen. The author would like to express thanks to all for their support. In addition; we would like to acknowledge all participants who attended the workshop and represented the following institutions: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project
    High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00 For: The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme Report issued 30 August 2002 (Version with minor corrections 16 September 2002) Keith Hiscock, Harvey Tyler-Walters and Hugh Jones Reference: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H. & Jones, H. 2002. High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Report from the Marine Biological Association to The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme. (AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00.) Correspondence: Dr. K. Hiscock, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB. [email protected] High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species ii High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species Title: High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Contract Report: W/35/00632/00/00. Client: Department of Trade and Industry (New & Renewable Energy Programme) Contract management: AEA Technology, Environment. Date of contract issue: 22/07/2002 Level of report issue: Final Confidentiality: Distribution at discretion of DTI before Consultation report published then no restriction. Distribution: Two copies and electronic file to DTI (Mr S. Payne, Offshore Renewables Planning). One copy to MBA library. Prepared by: Dr. K. Hiscock, Dr. H. Tyler-Walters & Hugh Jones Authorization: Project Director: Dr. Keith Hiscock Date: Signature: MBA Director: Prof. S. Hawkins Date: Signature: This report can be referred to as follows: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Examples of Sea Sponges
    Examples Of Sea Sponges Startling Amadeus burlesques her snobbishness so fully that Vaughan structured very cognisably. Freddy is ectypal and stenciling unsocially while epithelial Zippy forces and inflict. Monopolistic Porter sailplanes her honeymooners so incorruptibly that Sutton recirculates very thereon. True only on water leaves, sea of these are animals Yellow like Sponge Oceana. Deeper dives into different aspects of these glassy skeletons are ongoing according to. Sponges theoutershores. Cell types epidermal cells form outer covering amoeboid cells wander around make spicules. Check how These Beautiful Pictures of Different Types of. To be optimal for bathing, increasing with examples of brooding forms tan ct et al ratios derived from other microscopic plants from synthetic sponges belong to the university. What is those natural marine sponge? Different types of sponges come under different price points and loss different uses in. Global Diversity of Sponges Porifera NCBI NIH. Sponges EnchantedLearningcom. They publish the outer shape of rubber sponge 1 Some examples of sponges are Sea SpongeTube SpongeVase Sponge or Sponge Painted. Learn facts about the Porifera or Sea Sponges with our this Easy mountain for Kids. What claim a course Sponge Acme Sponge Company. BG Silicon isotopes of this sea sponges new insights into. Sponges come across an incredible summary of colors and an amazing array of shapes. 5 Fascinating Types of what Sponge Leisure Pro. Sea sponges often a tube-like bodies with his tiny pores. Sponges The World's Simplest Multi-Cellular Creatures. Sponges are food of various nudbranchs sea stars and fish. Examples of sponges Answers Answerscom. Sponges info and games Sheppard Software.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Dromia Neogenica Müller, 1979 (Decapoda, Brachyura, Dromiidae) from Neogene Strata in the Southern North Sea Basin
    FIRST RECORD OF DROMIA NEOGENICA MÜLLER, 1979 (DECAPODA, BRACHYURA, DROMIIDAE) FROM NEOGENE STRATA IN THE SOUTHERN NORTH SEA BASIN BY RENÉ H.B. FRAAIJE1,4), BARRY W.M. VAN BAKEL1,2,5) and JOHN W.M. JAGT3,6) 1) Oertijdmuseum De Groene Poort, Bosscheweg 80, NL-5283 Boxtel, The Netherlands 2) Nederlands Centrum voor Biodiversiteit (Naturalis), P.O. Box 9517, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands 3) Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht, de Bosquetplein 6-7, NL-6211 KJ Maastricht, The Netherlands ABSTRACT The sponge crab Dromia neogenica Müller, 1979 (Dromiidae) is recorded for the first time from strata of Neogene (late Miocene-early Pliocene) age in the southern North Sea Basin, on the basis of two concretion-preserved carapaces from Bemmel (north of Nijmegen, province of Gelderland, The Netherlands). The presence of this species, which was previously known from the middle-upper Miocene of Hungary and Algeria, suggests relatively higher seawater temperatures in the North Sea during the late Miocene-early Pliocene. Morphological differences (extraorbital and anterolateral teeth, development of cervical and branchiocardiac grooves) between D. neogenica and extant D. personata (Linnaeus, 1758) are relatively minor. This observation, coupled with the absence of the former species in mid-Pliocene and younger strata, and with the robust record of the latter in the mid-Pliocene to upper Pleistocene of Italy, would indicate that D. neogenica and D. personata are closely related, and probably represent the same lineage. RÉSUMÉ La dromie éponge Dromia neogenica Müller, 1979 (Dromiidae) est signalée pour la premiére fois dans les strates du Néogène (fin du Miocène-début du Pliocène) du sud du bassin de la mer du Nord.
    [Show full text]
  • Belgian Register of Marine Species
    BELGIAN REGISTER OF MARINE SPECIES September 2010 Belgian Register of Marine Species – September 2010 BELGIAN REGISTER OF MARINE SPECIES, COMPILED AND VALIDATED BY THE VLIZ BELGIAN MARINE SPECIES CONSORTIUM VLIZ SPECIAL PUBLICATION 46 SUGGESTED CITATION Leen Vandepitte, Wim Decock & Jan Mees (eds) (2010). Belgian Register of Marine Species, compiled and validated by the VLIZ Belgian Marine Species Consortium. VLIZ Special Publication, 46. Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee (VLIZ): Oostende, Belgium. 78 pp. ISBN 978‐90‐812900‐8‐1. CONTACT INFORMATION Flanders Marine Institute – VLIZ InnovOcean site Wandelaarkaai 7 8400 Oostende Belgium Phone: ++32‐(0)59‐34 21 30 Fax: ++32‐(0)59‐34 21 31 E‐mail: [email protected] or [email protected] ‐ 2 ‐ Belgian Register of Marine Species – September 2010 Content Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... ‐ 5 ‐ Used terminology and definitions ....................................................................................................... ‐ 7 ‐ Belgian Register of Marine Species in numbers .................................................................................. ‐ 9 ‐ Belgian Register of Marine Species ................................................................................................... ‐ 12 ‐ BACTERIA ............................................................................................................................................. ‐ 12 ‐ PROTOZOA ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Marmara Sea) and Ecological Characteristics of Their Habitats
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Eur J Biol 2017; 76(1): 20-5 Decapod Crustaceans in the Marmara Island (Marmara Sea) and Ecological Characteristics of Their Habitats Begum Ayfer, Husamettin Balkis, Aysegul Mulayim* Istanbul University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Istanbul, Turkey Please cite this article as: Ayfer B, Balkis H, Mulayim A. Decapod Crustaceans in the Marmara Island (Marmara Sea) and Ecological Characteristics of Their Habitats. Eur J Biol 2017; 76(1): 20-5. ABSTRACT We have performed series of analyses to identify decapod crustaceans inhabiting the littoral zone of the Marmara Island and to study specific ecological characteristics of the habitat. Samples of decapod crustaceans species were collected from 12 stations (6 onshore, 6 offshore) on May 12-17, 2008 and November 17-22, 2008. A total of 17 species and 1199 specimens of decapod crustaceans were recorded. Eigth species (A. lacazei, N. norvegicus, P. bluteli, P. longimana, P. platycheles, D. pugilator, D. personata and L. vernalis) have been reported in the littoral zone of Marmara Island for the first time in this study. Also our study also sheds light on some ecological properties (temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen) of the habitats of the species from the littoral zone of the Marmara Island. Keywords: Ecology, decapoda, crustacea, Marmara Island, The Sea of Marmara INTRODUCTION The first study at the island was carried out by Ostrou- moff (3,4) followed by studies by Okuş (5), Yüksek (6) The Archipelago in the Sea of Marmara consisting of and Balkıs (7). small and large islands located southwest of the Sea of Marmara and the northwest of the Kapıdağ Peninsula MATERIALS AND METHODS are referred to as the Islands of Marmara.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    PLATINUM The Journal of Threatened Taxa (JoTT) is dedicated to building evidence for conservaton globally by publishing peer-reviewed artcles OPEN ACCESS online every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All artcles published in JoTT are registered under Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License unless otherwise mentoned. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproducton, and distributon of artcles in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publicaton. Journal of Threatened Taxa Building evidence for conservaton globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Communication Varying colour pattern, yet genetically similar: Pebble Crab Seulocia vittata (Stimpson, 1858) (Brachyura: Leucosiidae) from the southeastern coast of India Sanjeevi Prakash & Amit Kumar 26 April 2020 | Vol. 12 | No. 5 | Pages: 15612–15618 DOI: 10.11609/jot.5801.12.5.15612-15618 For Focus, Scope, Aims, Policies, and Guidelines visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-0 For Artcle Submission Guidelines, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions For Policies against Scientfc Misconduct, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-2 For reprints, contact <[email protected]> The opinions expressed by the authors do not refect the views of the Journal of Threatened Taxa, Wildlife Informaton Liaison Development Society, Zoo Outreach Organizaton, or any of the partners.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biotope Sensitivity Database to Underpin Delivery of the Habitats Directive and Biodiversity Action Plan in the Seas Around England and Scotland
    English Nature Research Reports Number 499 A biotope sensitivity database to underpin delivery of the Habitats Directive and Biodiversity Action Plan in the seas around England and Scotland Harvey Tyler-Walters Keith Hiscock This report has been prepared by the Marine Biological Association of the UK (MBA) as part of the work being undertaken in the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN). The report is part of a contract placed by English Nature, additionally supported by Scottish Natural Heritage, to assist in the provision of sensitivity information to underpin the implementation of the Habitats Directive and the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. The views expressed in the report are not necessarily those of the funding bodies. Any errors or omissions contained in this report are the responsibility of the MBA. February 2003 You may reproduce as many copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains, jointly, with English Nature, Scottish Natural Heritage and the Marine Biological Association of the UK. ISSN 0967-876X © Joint copyright 2003 English Nature, Scottish Natural Heritage and the Marine Biological Association of the UK. Biotope sensitivity database Final report This report should be cited as: TYLER-WALTERS, H. & HISCOCK, K., 2003. A biotope sensitivity database to underpin delivery of the Habitats Directive and Biodiversity Action Plan in the seas around England and Scotland. Report to English Nature and Scottish Natural Heritage from the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN). Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the UK. [Final Report] 2 Biotope sensitivity database Final report Contents Foreword and acknowledgements.............................................................................................. 5 Executive summary .................................................................................................................... 7 1 Introduction to the project ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Associates of Four Species of Marine Sponges of Oregon and Washington Abstract Approved Redacted for Privacy (Ivan Pratt, Major Professor)
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Edward Ray Long for the M. S. in Zoology (Name) (Degree) (Major) /.,, Date thesis presented ://,/,(//i $» I Ì Ì Title The Associates of Four Species of Marine Sponges of Oregon and Washington Abstract approved Redacted for Privacy (Ivan Pratt, Major Professor) Four species of sponge from the coasts of Oregon and Wash- ington were studied and dissected for inhabitants and associates. All four species differed in texture, composition, and habitat, and likewise, the populations of associates of each species differed, even when samples of two of these species were found adjacent to one another. Generally, the relationships of the associates to the host sponges were of four sorts: 1. Inquilinism or lodging, either accidental or intentional; 2. Predation or grazing; 3. Competition for space resulting in "cohabitation" of an area, i, e. a plant or animal growing up through a sponge; and 4. Mutualism. Fish eggs in the hollow chambers of Homaxinella sp. represented a case of fish -in- sponge inqilinism, which is the first such one reported in the Pacific Ocean and in this sponge. The sponge Halichondria panicea, with an intracellular algal symbiont, was found to emit an attractant into the water, which Archidoris montereyensis followed in behavior experiments in preference to other sponges simultane- ously offered. A total of 6098 organisms, representing 68 species, were found associated with the specimens of Halichondria panic ea with densities of up to 19 organisms per cubic centimeter of sponge tissue. There were 9581 plants and animals found with Microciona prolifera, and 150 with Suberites lata.
    [Show full text]
  • National Monitoring Program for Biodiversity and Non-Indigenous Species in Egypt
    National monitoring program for biodiversity and non-indigenous species in Egypt January 2016 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Acknowledgements 3 Preamble 4 Chapter 1: Introduction 8 Overview of Egypt Biodiversity 37 Chapter 2: Institutional and regulatory aspects 39 National Legislations 39 Regional and International conventions and agreements 46 Chapter 3: Scientific Aspects 48 Summary of Egyptian Marine Biodiversity Knowledge 48 The Current Situation in Egypt 56 Present state of Biodiversity knowledge 57 Chapter 4: Development of monitoring program 58 Introduction 58 Conclusions 103 Suggested Monitoring Program Suggested monitoring program for habitat mapping 104 Suggested marine MAMMALS monitoring program 109 Suggested Marine Turtles Monitoring Program 115 Suggested Monitoring Program for Seabirds 117 Suggested Non-Indigenous Species Monitoring Program 121 Chapter 5: Implementation / Operational Plan 128 Selected References 130 Annexes 141 2 AKNOWLEGEMENTS 3 Preamble The Ecosystem Approach (EcAp) is a strategy for the integrated management of land, water and living resources that promotes conservation and sustainable use in an equitable way, as stated by the Convention of Biological Diversity. This process aims to achieve the Good Environmental Status (GES) through the elaborated 11 Ecological Objectives and their respective common indicators. Since 2008, Contracting Parties to the Barcelona Convention have adopted the EcAp and agreed on a roadmap for its implementation. First phases of the EcAp process led to the accomplishment of 5 steps of the scheduled 7-steps process such as: 1) Definition of an Ecological Vision for the Mediterranean; 2) Setting common Mediterranean strategic goals; 3) Identification of an important ecosystem properties and assessment of ecological status and pressures; 4) Development of a set of ecological objectives corresponding to the Vision and strategic goals; and 5) Derivation of operational objectives with indicators and target levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Pallas 1766) (Porifera: Demospongiae) Populations
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) On the Phylogeny of Halichondrid Demosponges Erpenbeck, D.J.G. Publication date 2004 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Erpenbeck, D. J. G. (2004). On the Phylogeny of Halichondrid Demosponges. Universiteit van Amsterdam. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:27 Sep 2021 Chapterr 5 AA molecular comparison of Alaskan and North East Atlantic HalichondriaHalichondria panicea (Pallas 1766) (Porifera: Demospongiae) populations (in(in press, Boll. Mus. 1st. bio. Univ. Genova) D.. Erpenbeck*, A.L. Knowlton", S.L. Talbot"*, R.C. Highsmith" and R.W.M. van Soest * TBED/Zoologicall Museum, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94766,1090GT Amsterdam, Netherlands "Institutee of Marine Science, University of Alaska Fairbanks, P.O.
    [Show full text]