DOCSLIB.ORG

Suffolk Coastal First Draft Local Plan Summer 2018 Kettleburgh Parish

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Suffolk Coastal First Draft Local Plan Summer 2018 Kettleburgh Parish Suffolk Coastal First Draft Local Plan Summer 2018 Kettleburgh Parish Council’s Summary of the implications for Kettleburgh (and beyond) Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan • Suffolk Coastal District Council (SCDC) has published a First Draft Local Plan for public consultation. The Suffolk Coastal Local Plan is a framework document which will outline how the council sees the district developing over the next couple of decades. This First Draft Local Plan covers the period to 2036 and contains the suggested planning policies, which will be used to determine planning applications in the area in the future. It also sets out the level of growth which needs to be planned for and identifies where that growth could be located and how it should be delivered. • This Draft Local Plan proposes, among other things, changes to the ‘Settlement Hierarchy’ and how Kettleburgh fits into that; the immediate consequence of that change is the proposal to build 16 houses on the north side of The Street. • If this draft plan, as presented, were to become reality then Kettleburgh would undergo significant change in the future. Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Settlement Hierarchy In 2009 SCDC’s Local Development Framework (LDF) established a Settlement Hierarchy as a policy tool for identifying a range of possible spatial development options that would provide for the scales of development required to meet the regional targets for development (particularly housing and employment). The following table was the result of this. Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Current Hierarchy From the LDF Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Other Villages (as Kettleburgh is classed as currently in the LDF) Other Villages are the settlements scattered across the District that do not have any, or have a minimal possession of facilities and services, relying totally on the higher order settlements to meet their day-to-day needs. They will not have physical limits boundaries drawn and to a considerable extent are considered as forming part of the countryside, contributing significantly to the overall character of the rural parts of the district. Small Villages (as proposed in the Suffolk Coastal First Draft Local Plan) Small Villages are identified due to their modest range of service provision, which will generally serve the needs of residents within the village but will cater for a smaller catchment than the Large Villages. As with the Large Villages, development of new housing in such settlements can help to support existing local services as well as contributing towards the mix of housing available in these villages. The form and character of Small Villages varies across the District and the impact upon these will be a key consideration in determining planning applications. Settlement Boundaries have been defined for Small Villages which identify the area within which the principle of development will be supported in accordance with Policy SCLP5.2 (see slide below). Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Strategic Policy SP28 – Other Villages (as currently) New housing will firstly and primarily be directed to and integrated within the settlements for which physical limits boundaries have been defined. The strategy for new housing in Other Villages is that it be strictly controlled and limited to: (a) replacement dwellings on a one to one basis where they are no more prominent or visually intrusive in the countryside than the building to be replaced; (b) the sub-division of an existing larger dwelling where this would meet a local need; (c) conversion of an existing building subject to certain controls. New housing might be permitted in order to address local needs but only in exceptional circumstances where there is demonstrated community support e.g. through a community plan. Such circumstances might be: i) small developments of a scale appropriate to the size, location and characteristics of the particular community; or ii) in the form of the infilling of a plot within the physical core of the settlement by one or two dwellings for affordable housing. The cumulative impact on the character of the settlement through the development of a number of sites over time will be taken into account. Proposed Policy SCLP5.2: Housing Development in Small Villages Residential development will be permitted within defined Settlement Boundaries where it is: a) A small group of dwellings of a scale appropriate to the size, location and character of the village; or b) Infill development (in accordance with Policy SCLP5.7). Residential development will be permitted on Exception Sites adjacent or well related to defined Settlement Boundaries in accordance with policy SCP5.11. Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Current LDF Policy SP28 for Other Villages Proposed Policy Approach for Small Villages (Physical Limits introduced) Development within existing Protection of local shops New housing allocations (Section employment areas (Policy (SCLP4.13) 12) SCLP4.1) Small groups of new housing and Development of employment infill within Settlement Boundaries uses appropriate to the scale of (SCLP5.2) the settlement (Policy SCLP4.2 and Policy SCLP4.5) Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Proposed Hierarchy • Policy SCLP3.3: Settlement Hierarchy • The Settlement Hierarchy enables the Council to achieve its vision for the District, meeting the scale of development required and enhancing the quality of the built, natural, historic, social and cultural environments whilst sustaining the vitality of communities. • The development requirements for Major Centres, Market Towns, Large Villages and Small Villages will be delivered through site allocations in the Local Plan or in Neighbourhood Plans, plus through windfall development in accordance with other policies in this Local Plan. • The development requirements in the Countryside will come forward through Neighbourhood Plans and windfall sites in accordance with other policies in this Local Plan. Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Major Centre – Felixstowe East of Ipswich - Kesgrave, Martlesham Heath, Brightwell Lakes, Purdis Farm, Rushmere St Andrew (excluding village) Market Towns – Aldeburgh Framlingham Leiston Saxmundham Woodbridge Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Large Villages – Bramfield Otley Earl Soham Rendlesham Grundisburgh Snape Hollesley Trimley St Martin Knodishall Trimley St Mary Martlesham (village) Wenhaston Melton (village) Wickham Market Nacton Yoxford Orford Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Small Villages (43 in number) – Alderton Eyke Sutton Heath Aldringham Great Glemham Theberton Badingham Hacheston Thorpeness Bawdsey Hasketon Tuddenham Benhall Kelsale Tunstal Blythburgh Kettleburgh Ufford Brandeston Kirton (including part of Falkenham) Walberswick Bredfield Levington Waldringfield Bucklesham Little Bealings Westerfield Campsea Ashe Middleton Westleton Charsfield Newbourne Witnesham Clopton Peasenhall (with part of Sibton) Dallinghoo Pettistree Darsham Rendham Dennington Rushmere St. Andrew (village) Easton Sutton Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Countryside (53 in number) – Is “All other settlements” which are Blaxhall Cretingham Leatheringham Sternfield Boulge Culpho Linstead Magna Stratford St. A Boyton Debach Linstead Parva Stratton Hall Brightwell Dunwich Little Glemham Sudbourne Bromeswell Falkenham Marlesford Swefling Bruisyard Farnham Melton Park Swilland Burgh Foxhall Monewdon Thorington Butley Friston Parham Ubbeston Capel St Andrew Gedgrave Playford Walpole Chediston Great Bealings Ramsholt Wantisden Chillesford Hemley Saxtead Cookley Heveningham Shottisham Cransford Hoo Sibton Cratfield Huntingfield Sizewell Iken Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan The proposed Policy Approach for the Settlement Hierarchy is as follows Small Villages Employment Development within existing employment areas (Policy SCLP4.1) Development of employment uses appropriate to the scale of the settlement (Policy SCLP4.2 and Policy SCLP4.5) Retail Protection of local shops (SCLP4.13) Housing New housing allocations (Section 12) Small groups of new housing and infill within Settlement Boundaries (SCLP5.2) Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Countryside Employment Conversion and replacement of rural buildings for employment uses (Policy SCLP4.6) Farm diversification (Policy SCLP4.7) Development within existing employment areas (Policy SCLP4.1) New employment uses where need is demonstrated (Policy SCLP4.2) Retail Protection of local shops (SCLP4.13) Housing New housing within clusters of existing dwellings (SCLP5.4) Affordable housing on exception sites (SCLP5.11) Conversions of agricultural buildings / replacement dwellings (SCLP5.3) Rural worker’s dwellings (SCLP5.6) Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan So what could this all mean for Kettleburgh? Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Only site currently proposed in Kettleburgh within the SCLP – Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Sites considered in Appendix B of the SCLP – Alternative Sites: Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Sites considered in Appendix B of the SCLP – Alternative Sites: (Cont.) [SHELAA stands for “Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment”] Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan However the KPC comments to the Issues and Options Consultation in 2017 were Suffolk Coastal First draft Local Plan However
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Parishes of Brandeston and Kettleburgh
    BRANDESTON AND KETTLEBURGH PARISH NEWS SEPTEMBER 2011 THE PARISHES OF BRANDESTON AND KETTLEBURGH Dear Friends, One of the abiding memories of August will be the shocking sight of the looting and riots seen on television, and graphically reported in the press. Such scenes seemed to be beyond comprehension, and from peaceful Suffolk almost on another planet. But the reality is that two hours away in parts of London the police for a short time lost control of the streets. It is too easy for the Church to adopt the moral high ground at times like these, but one has to ask whether as a society, we are reaping the harvest of an increasingly secular, and materialistic society. In Marlesford Church, and many others, the Creed and the 10 commandments are framed on either side of the altar table, at the East End of the Church. Countless children who attended Church and Sunday School would have grown up with these reminders of Christian values. They formed the basis of our society. ‘Thou shalt not steal’ is not a negative commandment, but a reminder that with rights come responsibilities. The Church has a vital part to play in building community, and perhaps its teachings will be seen to be as relevant now as they ever were. May God bless you all, Harry Edwards. Rector. 1 Assistant Priest: Reverend Robin Alderson 01728 688255 Mob. 07790 242002 Brandeston Elders: Mrs Mary Baker 685807 Miss Eileen Leach MBE 685298 Churchwardens: Miss Eileen Leach MBE 685298 Mrs Alison Molyneux 685244 Kettleburgh Elders: Mrs Jackie Clark 723623 Mrs Valerie Upson 723078 Churchwardens: Mr John Bater 723532 Mrs Valerie Upson 723078 DIARY FOR SEPTEMBER 2011 Thursday 1st 10.00am Brandeston Coffee Morning, 100+ Club Draw at Village Hall Thursday 1st 7.30pm Film Club “Jean de Florette” at Brandeston Village hall – see below.
    [Show full text]
  • Baptism Data Available
    Suffolk Baptisms - July 2014 Data Available Baptism Register Deanery or Grouping From To Acton, All Saints Sudbury 1754 1900 Akenham, St Mary Claydon 1754 1903 Aldeburgh, St Peter & St Paul Orford 1813 1904 Alderton, St Andrew Wilford 1754 1902 Aldham, St Mary Sudbury 1754 1902 Aldringham cum Thorpe, St Andrew Dunwich 1813 1900 Alpheton, St Peter & St Paul Sudbury 1754 1901 Alpheton, St Peter & St Paul (BTs) Sudbury 1780 1792 Ampton, St Peter Thedwastre 1754 1903 Ashbocking, All Saints Bosmere 1754 1900 Ashby, St Mary Lothingland 1813 1900 Ashfield cum Thorpe, St Mary Claydon 1754 1901 Great Ashfield, All Saints Blackbourn 1765 1901 Aspall, St Mary of Grace Hartismere 1754 1900 Assington, St Edmund Sudbury 1754 1900 Athelington, St Peter Hoxne 1754 1904 Bacton, St Mary Hartismere 1754 1901 Badingham, St John the Baptist Hoxne 1813 1900 Badley, St Mary Bosmere 1754 1902 Badwell Ash, St Mary Blackbourn 1754 1900 Bardwell, St Peter & St Paul Blackbourn 1754 1901 Barham, St Mary Claydon 1754 1901 Barking, St Mary Bosmere 1754 1900 Barnardiston, All Saints Clare 1754 1899 Barnham, St Gregory Blackbourn 1754 1812 Barningham, St Andrew Blackbourn 1754 1901 Barrow, All Saints Thingoe 1754 1900 Barsham, Holy Trinity Wangford 1813 1900 Great Barton, Holy Innocents Thedwastre 1754 1901 Barton Mills, St Mary Fordham 1754 1812 Battisford, St Mary Bosmere 1754 1899 Bawdsey, St Mary the Virgin Wilford 1754 1902 Baylham, St Peter Bosmere 1754 1900 09 July 2014 Copyright © Suffolk Family History Society 2014 Page 1 of 12 Baptism Register Deanery or Grouping
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Services Operating Through Rushmere St Andrew
    Bus Services operating through Rushmere St Andrew Route 4 Ipswich to Bixley Farm via Felixstowe Road & Broke Hall Operated by Ipswich Buses (Tel 0800 919390) Web: www.ipswichbuses.co.uk Buses run Mondays to Saturdays (except public holidays), in the daytime - approximately every half hour. Route: Ipswich Tower Ramparts - Ipswich Old Cattle Market Bus Station – Felixstowe Road – Broke Hall –Bixley Farm (via Foxhall Road, Broadlands Way, District Centre & Bixley Drive). Click here for timetable details. Timetable history:- 01/11/15 Route and timetable changes 11/04/16 Timetable changes 04/09/16 Minor timetable change 18/02/18 Timetable changes, route no longer serves Ipswich Railway station or Martlesham Heath Route 63 Ipswich to Framlingham via Woodbridge Road, Kesgrave, Martlesham, Woodbridge, Wickham Market & Hacheston Operated by First In Norfolk & Suffolk (Tel 01473 253800) Web: www.firstgroup.com/ukbus/suffolk_norfolk One school days journey each way. Route: Ipswich Old Cattle Market Bus Station – Woodbridge Road - Kesgrave (Main Road) – Fentons Way (4 services only) – Cambridge Road / Edmonton Close (3 services only) Martlesham Tesco - Woodbridge – Melton Chapel – Ufford – Wickham Market – Hacheston – Framlingham (Thomas Mills) All services are wheelchair and buggy-accessible. Click here for timetable details. Timetable history:- 30/08/15 Timetable changes 03/01/16 Timetable changes 27/03/16 Timetable changes 02/07/17 Extended route, now school days only – otherwise remainder within 64 service. Route 64 Ipswich to Aldeburgh via Woodbridge Road, Woodbridge, Melton, Saxmundham & Leiston Operated by First In Norfolk & Suffolk (Tel 01473 253800) Web: www.firstgroup.com/ukbus/suffolk_norfolk Buses run Mondays to Saturdays (except public holidays), in the daytime and early evening – typically every hour.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Parish: Rushmere St Andrews
    1. Parish: Rushmere St Andrews Meaning: Rushy Lake (Ekwall) 2. Hundred: Carlford Deanery: Carlford (-1920), Ipswich (1920-) Union: Woodbridge, part of Ipswich Borough RDC/UDC: (E. Suffolk) Woodbridge RD (1894-1934), Deben (1934- 1974) Suffolk Costal DC (1974-) Other administrative details: Created civil parish from part of Rushmere not within Ipswich (18%) Civil boundary change (1894) Part transferred to Ipswich (1934) Ecclesiastical boundary change to create Ipswich St Augustine of Hippo (1928) Ecclesiastical boundary change to create Ipswich St Andrew (1958) Woodbridge Petty Sessional Division Ipswich County Court District 3. Area: 1,523 acres (1912) 4. Soils: Mixed: a) Deep well drained sandy often ferruginous soils, risk wind and water erosion b) Deep fine loam soils with slowly permeable subsoils and slight seasonal waterlogging. Some fine loam over clay. Some deep well drained coarse loam over clay, fine loam and sandy soils c) Deep well drained fine loam over clay, coarse loam over clay and fine loams some with olacareous subsoils. 5. Types of farming: 1086 17 ½ acres meadow 1500–1640 Thirsk: Wood-pasture region, mainly pasture, meadow, engaged in rearing and dairying with some pig-keeping, horse breeding and poultry. Crops mainly barley with some wheat, rye, oats, peas, vetches, hops and occasionally hemp. Also has similarities with sheep-corn region where sheep are main fertilizing agent, bred for fattening barley main cash crop. 1 1818 Marshall: Wide variations of crop and management techniques including summer fallow in preparation for corn and rotation of turnip, barley, clover, weat on lighter land. 1937 Main crops: Wheat, barley, beans, peas 1969 Trist: More intensive cereal growing and sugar beet 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parishes of Brandeston and Kettleburgh
    THE PARISHES OF BRANDESTON AND KETTLEBURGH Dear Friends “Thank you”. I’ve found myself wanting to say thank you at various moments and to various people during the last month or so. I’ve wanted to say thank you to everyone who made our Harvest Festivals such memorable events earlier this month, and to all those people whose donations will provide positive improvements to the lives of people in the third World; and thank you, too, for the wonderful Harvest Lunches and Suppers which so many of us enjoyed. Thank you, also, to all who helped with the annual clean-up and tidy of Churches and Church-yards in the benefice. The spirit with which so many people took part made these occasions fun as well as achieving their purpose. And thank you, too, for all the help that you have given to your Church throughout the last year. The Church is there for you when you need it; and it is wonderful that so many people have continued to support their Church this year, in all the ways they have. Of course, November is the month each year when we express our eternal thankfulness for all those who served their country during time of war; we do this in our annual “Remembrance” of those who have lost their lives. A few weeks ago, I met a Journalist who spent six months of 2008 in Afghanistan, working with 16 th Air Assault Brigade, the Army Formation based in Colchester. He has now published a book describing the conditions under which our young men and women serve there.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Draft Report Rushmere St Andrew
    RUSHMERE ST ANDREW Design Guidelines and Codes FINAL DRAFT REPORT March 2021 RUSHMERE ST ANDREW | Neighbourhood Plan Design Guidelines Quality information Prepared by Checked by Jimmy Lu Ben Castell Senior Urban Director Designer Revision History Revision Revision date Details Name Position 3 - - - - 2 19-03-2021 Review Jimmy Lu Senior Urban Designer 1 18-01-2021 Report preparation Jimmy Lu Senior Urban and review Designer 0 15-01-2021 Report preparation Hoorieh Morshedi Graduate Urban Designer This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) in accordance with its contract with Locality (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. AECOM shall have no liability to any third party that makes use of or relies upon this document. 2 AECOM RUSHMERE ST ANDREW | Neighbourhood Plan Design Guidelines Contents 1. Introduction ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������6 1.1. Overview 6 1.2. Objective 6 1.3. Process 6 1.4. Area of study 8 2. Local character analysis �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������12 2.1. Introduction 12 2.2. Character areas 12 2.3. Settlement patterns and built forms 14 2.4. Streets and public realm 16 2.5. Open space 17 2.6. Building heights and roofline 18 2.7. Car parking 19 3. Design guidelines and codes ..........................................................................................................22 3.1. Introduction 22 3.2. Rushmere St Andrew design principles 22 3.3. Checklists 56 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mattin Family of Campsea Ashe
    The Mattin Family of Campsea Ashe Research by Sheila Holmes July 2014 © Sheila Holmes Mattin Family The Mattin families lived in Campsea Ashe from at least 1803 until the early part of the 20th century. Thomas Mattin and his wife Elizabeth nee Curtis, lived in the neighbouring village of Hacheston. Their son Thomas, married a girl from Campsea Ashe, where they settled for the rest of their married lives. They brought up their children and some of whom continued to live in the village. The Mattin family, were connected to several other Campsea Ashe families through marriage, such as the Youngmans , Mays, Lings, Curtis’s, Townrows and Knights. It is possible that one branch of the family lived in Little Glemham but so far no definite connection has been found, In 1881, there were there were 6 Mattin families living in the village at same time. Connection with the Youngman family. John Youngman, born 15th December 1791 and died on 15th March 1874, Campsea Ashe, married Elizabeth Ling on 25th May 1813. Their daughter, Charlotte, born 1817, married Charles Mattin,. Charles and Charlotte had a son, Charles, born 1839. Young Charles Mattin lived with his grand parents, John and Elizabeth Youngman from the age of 2 in Campsea Ashe. Charged with Actual Bodily Harm. An entry in the records of the Quarter Sessions at Ipswich on 1st July 1870 states, Charles Mattin and James Mattin, the younger, were charged with causing actual bodily harm, were sentenced to 12 calendar months imprisonment with hard labour. It is not known who these two men were or indeed whether they were members of our Mattin family.
    [Show full text]
  • Grove Farm House Dallinghoo | Woodbridge | Suffolk
    Grove Farm House Dallinghoo | Woodbridge | Suffolk | IP13 0LR Guide Price £1,500,000 Freehold About the property: The annex enjoys independent access but can also Internal viewing is essential to appreciate the full potential of this Grove Farm House is approached via a tree lined be approached via The Farm House utility room. flexible family home that may offer further potential for shingle driveway. The property was built in 1982 The annex comprises: Hall with cupboard housing multigenerational living, holiday lets or other business opportunities and now includes two further dwellings, an adjacent an oil fired combination boiler, a dual aspect sitting (subject to the necessary consents). indoor heated swimming pool, gym and a range of room, kitchen/dining room with French doors useful outbuildings set within grounds extending to opening to a terrace, two double bedrooms and a About The Area: bathroom equipped with a bath and double shower about four acres (STS) to include formal gardens, The village of Dallinghoo has a pretty village Church and is located paddocks and a field. The property has been a cubicle. close to the pretty, neighbouring village of Charsfield which has a wonderful family home and may suit The bungalow/Holiday let (connected to the annex primary school and a garage with a shop. Wickham Market, less than multigenerational living, enabling extended families but currently enjoying independent access) was 4 miles away, has a selection of shops and amenities and the larger to live together with the benefit of independent thoughtfully designed and built in 2015 to market towns of Woodbridge (barely 5 1/2 miles) and Framlingham accommodation, or could be enjoyed as primary incorporate vaulted ceilings within the primary (under 7 miles) offer an excellent range of shops, restaurants, public residence with potential for holiday lets or other rooms and comprises: Entrance hall, dual aspect houses, schools, recreation and general amenities.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LONDON GAZETTE, JANUARY 19, 1-864. No. 22809. C
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, JANUARY 19, 1-864. 277 each. And that, with the exceptions aforesaid, the within the hundred of Stow, as are not included several parishes and places included in the hun- in any highway district formed in the Western dreds of Mutford and Lothingtand, that Is to say, Division of the said county, that is to say, the the several parishes of Ashby, Barnby, .Helton several parishes of Akenham, Ashfield-with- and Brownston, Blundeston with Flixton, Brad- Thorpe, Ashbocking, Badley, Barham, Barking, well, Burgh Castle, Carlton Colville, Gorton, and Darmsden, Battisford, Baylham, Blakenham Fritton, Gisleham, Gunton, Herringfleet, Hopton, Great, Blakenham Little, Bramford, Bricet Kessingland, Lound, Mutford, Oulton, Pakefield Great, Claydon, Coddenham, Greeting All Saints', with such part of Kirkley as is not included Greeting Saint Mary, Creeting Saint Olave, under the Lowestoft Improvement Act, Rushmere, Crowfield, Debenham, Flowton, Framsden, and Somerleyton, shall constitute a Highway Gosbeck, Helmingham, Hemingstone, Henley, District, to be known as "The Mutford and Mickfield, Needham Market, Nettlestead, Offton- Lothingland District." And we do hereby order, with-Little Bricet, Pettaugh, Old Newton-with- that all the several parishes comprised in the said Dagworth, Onehouse, Shetland, Stowmarket and district shall have one Waywarden each. And ChUton, Stowupland, Ringshall, Somersham, that, with the exceptions aforesaid, the several Stonham Aspall, Stonham Earl, Stonham Parva, parishes and places included in the Plomesgate
    [Show full text]
  • Fynn - Lark Ews May 2019
    Fynn - Lark ews May 2019 HIGHWAYS AND BYWAYS May is traditionally a month to enjoy the great outdoors in mild and fragrant weather. Whether that means looking for a romantic maypole to dance around, trying to stay ahead of the rapid garden growth or merely enjoying the longer days and busy birdsong, it is for some a month to get outside and appreciate the English countryside we have access to, right on our doorsteps. This year sees the 70th anniversary of the creation of our National Parks – not that we have one in easy reach in Suffolk – but the same legislation required all English Parish Councils to survey all their footpaths, bridleways and byways, as the start of the legal process to record where the public had a right of way over the countryside. Magazine for the Parishes of Great & Little Bealings, Playford and Culpho 1 2 On the Little Bealings Parish Council surveyor is the rather confusing: "A website are the survey sheets showing common law right to plough exists if the the Council carrying out this duty in 1951. landowner can show, or you know, that From the descriptions of where they he has ploughed this particular stretch of walked, many of the routes are easily path for living memory. Just because a identifiable, as the routes in use are path is ploughed out does not necessarily signed ‘Public Footpath’ today. The indicate a common law right to plough; Council was required to state the reason the ploughing may be unlawful. why it thought each route it surveyed was Alternatively, there may be a right to for the public to use.
    [Show full text]
  • Records Relating to the 1939 – 1945 War
    Records Relating to the 1939 – 1945 War This is a list of resources in the three branches of the Record Office which relate exclusively to the 1939-1945 War and which were created because of the War. However, virtually every type of organisation was affected in some way by the War so it could also be worthwhile looking at the minute books and correspondence files of local councils, churches, societies and organisations, and also school logbooks. The list is in three sections: Pages 1-10: references in all the archive collections except for the Suffolk Regiment archive. They are arranged by theme, moving broadly from the beginning of the War to its end. Pages 10-12: printed books in the Local Studies collections. Pages 12-21: references in the Suffolk Regiment archive (held in the Bury St Edmunds branch). These are mainly arranged by Battalion. (B) = Bury Record Office; (I) = Ipswich Record Office; (L) = Lowestoft Record Office 1. Air Raid Precautions and air raids ADB506/3 Letter re air-raid procedure, 1940 (B) D12/4/1-2 Bury Borough ARP Control Centre, in and out messages, 1940-1945 (B) ED500/E1/14 Hadleigh Police Station ARP file, 1943-1944 (B) EE500/1/125 Bury Borough ARP Committee minutes, 1935-1939 (B) EE500/33/17/1-7 Bury Town Clerk’s files, 1937-1950 (B) EE500/33/18/1-6 Bury Town Clerk’s files re Fire Guard, 1938-1947 (B) EE500/44/155-6 Bury Borough: cash books re Government Shelter scheme (B) EE501/6/142-147 Sudbury Borough ARP registers, report books and papers, 1938-1945 (B) EE501/8/27(323, Plans of air-raid shelters, Sudbury,
    [Show full text]
  • Local-Plan-Review-10-17.Pdf (Pdf)
    Benhall & Sternfield Parish Council Parish Clerk. Mrs Melanie Thurston. 19 Stanhope Close Snape Suffolk IP17 1RH Tel. 01728 688 849 Mob. 0783 7528 187 [email protected] Chairman: Dr Hilary Graham [email protected] ISSUES & OPTIONS FOR THE SUFFOLK COASTAL LOCAL PLAN REVIEW, OCTOBER 2017 Introduction Benhall and Sternfield Parish Council questions the advisability of significant housing development along the A12, in the Saxmundham area, given the limited local employment opportunities and the inherent need to use travel corridors that are already at or in excess of capacity. It is accepted that there will be some housing development in Benhall and Sternfield, but growth should be proportional, capable of being absorbed into the existing village environment, and clearly separate from Saxmundham and other surrounding villages. Part 1 – Strategic / Cross Boundary Issues 1.1 Vision Benhall and Sternfield are villages in a rural setting and should remain so. It is accepted there will always be a blend of urban and rural areas within the District, which address a range of preferences of life styles, and any movement towards urbanisation of the countryside should be resisted. Development should not be permitted that puts undue strain on traffic corridors (road & rail), and local services. 1.2 Growth The need to meet Baseline growth is accepted, but growth beyond that is not favoured remote from established commercial centres. Sizewell C is still only speculation, and should be disregarded from growth considerations. 1.3 Growth Wherever there is development in the Plan area, there will be an increased location demand for improved access to Ipswich, being the main commercial hub.
    [Show full text]