Else Alfelt, Lotti Van Der Gaag, and Defining Cobra

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Else Alfelt, Lotti Van Der Gaag, and Defining Cobra WAS THE MATTER SETTLED? ELSE ALFELT, LOTTI VAN DER GAAG, AND DEFINING COBRA Kari Boroff A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2020 Committee: Katerina Ruedi Ray, Advisor Mille Guldbeck Andrew Hershberger © 2020 Kari Boroff All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Katerina Ruedi Ray, Advisor The CoBrA art movement (1948-1951) stands prominently among the few European avant-garde groups formed in the aftermath of World War II. Emphasizing international collaboration, rejecting the past, and embracing spontaneity and intuition, CoBrA artists created artworks expressing fundamental human creativity. Although the group was dominated by men, a small number of women were associated with CoBrA, two of whom continue to be the subject of debate within CoBrA scholarship to this day: the Danish painter Else Alfelt (1910-1974) and the Dutch sculptor Lotti van der Gaag (1923-1999), known as “Lotti.” In contributing to this debate, I address the work and CoBrA membership status of Alfelt and Lotti by comparing their artworks to CoBrA’s two main manifestoes, texts that together provide the clearest definition of the group’s overall ideas and theories. Alfelt, while recognized as a full CoBrA member, created structured, geometric paintings, influenced by German Expressionism and traditional Japanese art; I thus argue that her work does not fit the group’s formal aesthetic or philosophy. Conversely Lotti, who was never asked to join CoBrA, and was rejected from exhibiting with the group, produced sculptures with rough, intuitive, and childlike forms that clearly do fit CoBrA’s ideas as presented in its two manifestoes. Examining Alfelt’s and Lotti’s individual roles within CoBrA through the feminist art theories of Linda Nochlin and Laura Mulvey, writings by scholars and art historians, and exhibitions and collections, I focus on individual and institutional influences, and patriarchal contexts that shaped these two artists’ status in relation to CoBrA membership. In doing so, I also pose questions about who belongs in any art movement, and who gets to decide who belongs, and how all of this is defined complexly over time. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Throughout my research process I have gained a lifelong passion for the CoBrA art movement. Under the guidance of Dr. Katerina Ruedi Ray and Dr. Andrew Hershberger, I took two independent study courses on the CoBrA movement prior to writing this thesis, which helped me tremendously in my research. My deepest gratitude goes to my committee members Dr. Ruedi Ray, Dr. Hershberger, and Professor Mille Guldbeck. It is through their insight, and motivation, that my thesis became possible. In addition, I would like to thank Professor Guldbeck for her devoted and excellent translations of Danish texts into English. Also, with the encouragement of Dr. Ruedi Ray, I was able to visit the Nova Southeastern University Art Museum in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, which houses the largest collection of CoBrA art in North America. This trip was invaluable to me personally and it provided me with primary source material that was imperative to my research. In particular, I am grateful to Dr. Barbara Lynes, Sunny Kaufman Senior Curator, and the kind staff from the NSU Art Museum for allowing me access to their archives and private collection. I also would like to express my sincere gratitude to all of the faculty members at the BGSU School of Art who have encouraged me and offered their guidance. I especially would like to thank Librarian Amy Fry, BGSU’s Electronic Resources Coordinator, for meeting with me and helping me find sources. I would like to thank Professor Michael Arrigo, Graduate Coordinator for the School of Art, for assisting me through this entire process. Also, I am grateful to Dr. Allie Terry-Fritsch, Dr. Rebecca Skinner-Green, Dr. Sean Leatherbury, and Professor Ruthy Light for their encouragement. Finally, I would like to acknowledge the support of my family: my husband Jason Himes, whose patience, encouragement, and creativity continues to inspire me; and to my two stepchildren Dorian and Jacob Himes, whose presence in my life has given me so much love and meaning. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 IN BUT NOT IN: ELSE ALFELT ........................................................................................ 8 OUT BUT NOT OUT: LOTTI VAN DER GAAG ............................................................... 13 PATRIARCHY ...................................................................................................................... 17 MANIFESTO ONE: LA CAUSE ÉTAIT ENTENDUE (THE MATTER WAS SETTLED) .... 22 MANIFESTO TWO: CONSTANT’S MANIFESTO ............................................................ 26 SCHOLARS AND ART HISTORIANS ............................................................................... 33 EXHIBITIONS, COLLECTIONS, AND COLLECTORS ................................................... 38 CONCLUSION: WAS THE MATTER SETTLED? ............................................................ 43 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................. 48 APPENDIX A: FIGURES ..................................................................................................... 53 1 INTRODUCTION The CoBrA art movement (1948-1951) stands prominently among the few European avant-garde groups formed in the aftermath of World War II.1 The artwork that CoBrA created reflected a turbulent era in which artists longed for a new way of life.2 The group emerged in the moment when naïve optimism was essential to distancing oneself from the legacy of war, when individuals sought a better future, and when hope grew stronger that international collaboration could produce a new society.3 As an international movement, with artists representing the cities of Copenhagen, Brussels, and Amsterdam (the name CoBrA derives from the three cities’ initials), the work of CoBrA is often characterized by direct, spontaneous expression and a rebellion against the dominant culture of the bourgeoisie. Their artwork reflected a return to what they saw as an expression of the fundamental creativity present in human existence. Taking their inspiration from children’s art, from the art of so-called “primitives,” and from art of the mentally unstable, CoBrA artists wanted to “start again like a child.”4 Although all of those influences had been explored together before, through the work of Jean Dubuffet (1901- 1985) and the German Expressionists, most notably Paul Klee (1879-1940), the work of CoBrA remained and continues to be distinctive because of the group’s international collaboration. The alliances between the artists of Copenhagen, Brussels, and Amsterdam helped strengthen the 1 There are several different ways that CoBrA has been spelled: Cobra, COBRA, and CoBrA. Adhering to its acronym, comprised of the first one or two letters of the capital cities of its members’ nations, it will be referred to as CoBrA in this thesis. 2 Willemijn Stokvis, Cobra: The History of a European Avant-Garde Movement 1948-1951 (Rotterdam: nai010 Publishers, 2017), 7. 3 Willemijn Stokvis, Cobra: An International Movement in Art after the Second World War (New York: Rizzoli International Publications Inc., 1988), book sleeve. 4 Eleanor Flomenhaft, The Roots and Development of Cobra Art (Hempstead: The Fine Arts Museum of Long Island, 1985), 33. 2 bonds between those three European cities, making CoBrA one of the most dynamic European art movements to emerge during the middle of the twentieth century.5 CoBrA was dominated by men. Of its approximately thirty-five members, twenty-six or so were men, and their membership within the group, for the most part, has not been challenged by art historians. Among the small number of women members associated with CoBrA, two notable female artists continue to be the subject of contentious debate within CoBrA scholarship to this day: the Danish painter Else Alfelt (1910-1974) and the Dutch sculptor Lotti van der Gaag (1923-1999), known as Lotti (Figs. 1 and 2).6 Alfelt is considered by art historians, and she was also seen by leading CoBrA artists—if at times begrudgingly—as a member of the group.7 CoBrA membership of another female artist, Sonja Ferlov Mancoba (1911-1984), has not been challenged either by members of the group, or by art historians. Ferlov Mancoba’s work is seen as CoBrA dominant in both principles and aesthetics. In addition to Alfelt and Ferlov Mancoba, two other women artists, Anneliese Hager (1904-1997) and Madeleine Kemeny-Szemere (1906-1993), were considered as part of the group by CoBrA co-founder and leading artist, Corneille Guillaume Beverloo (1922-2010), referred to by his first name, Corneille. However, the leading CoBrA artists including Corneille—and, until recently, also art historians—have not regarded Lotti as a member.8 Corneille also did not consider as members two other women artists, Ferdina Jansen (Ferdi, 1927-1969) and Dora Tuynman (1926-1979), but this view is also held by key CoBrA art historians as well. Neither of these two artists are even mentioned in key texts about CoBrA.9 An eighth artist, photographer 5 Flomenhaft, The Roots and Development, 3. 6 Charlotte van der Gaag chose to use her nickname “Lotti” as her artist name. 7 Jean-Clarence Lambert, Cobra, trans.
Recommended publications
  • The Mediatization of the Artist
    The Mediatization of the Artist 19-20 June 2014 This June, renowned film scholars and art historians will join together for the international conference The Mediatization of the Artist. The aim of this event is to investigate the presence of the visual artist in a variety of (popular) media from the nineteenth century to today. With the rise of notions of artistic autonomy and the simultaneous demise of old systems of patronage, artists increasingly found themselves confronted with the necessity of developing a public image. Simultaneously, new audiences for art discovered their fascination for the life and work of the artist. The rise of new media – the illustrated press, photography and film – meant that the needs of both parties could be easily satisfied with both words and images. This led to a transformation of the artist from a mere producer of works of art into a widely recognized celebrity. The mechanisms of this transformation and its consequences for the both the popular image and self-understanding of the artist will be the focus of the papers, discussions and screenings that will take place over two days at two spectacular locations in Amsterdam. Practical Information When: 19-20 June 2014 Where: Thursday, 19 June – EYE Film Institute, IJpromenade 1, Amsterdam Friday, 20 June – Het Bethaniënklooster, Barndesteeg 6b, Amsterdam Costs: € 50 regular / € 25 students The number of places is limited and a pre-paid reservation is required. Payment method: All participants are kindly requested to register by sending an e-mail to [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins and Meanings of Non-Objective Art by Adam Mccauley
    The Origins and Meanings of Non-Objective Art The Origins and Meanings of Non-Objective Art Adam McCauley, Studio Art- Painting Pope Wright, MS, Department of Fine Arts ABSTRACT Through my research I wanted to find out the ideas and meanings that the originators of non- objective art had. In my research I also wanted to find out what were the artists’ meanings be it symbolic or geometric, ideas behind composition, and the reasons for such a dramatic break from the academic tradition in painting and the arts. Throughout the research I also looked into the resulting conflicts that this style of art had with critics, academia, and ultimately governments. Ultimately I wanted to understand if this style of art could be continued in the Post-Modern era and if it could continue its vitality in the arts today as it did in the past. Introduction Modern art has been characterized by upheavals, break-ups, rejection, acceptance, and innovations. During the 20th century the development and innovations of art could be compared to that of science. Science made huge leaps and bounds; so did art. The innovations in travel and flight, the finding of new cures for disease, and splitting the atom all affected the artists and their work. Innovative artists and their ideas spurred revolutionary art and followers. In Paris, Pablo Picasso had fragmented form with the Cubists. In Italy, there was Giacomo Balla and his Futurist movement. In Germany, Wassily Kandinsky was working with the group the Blue Rider (Der Blaue Reiter), and in Russia Kazimer Malevich was working in a style that he called Suprematism.
    [Show full text]
  • 18ª Bienal De São Paulo
    CATÁLOGO GERAL 18~ BIENAL INTERNACIONAL DE SÃO PAULO 4 de Outubro a 15 de .... 0::;;"'-<:;;, de 1985 G GERAL Fundação Bienal de São Paulo Pavilhão Engenheiro Armando Arruda Pereira Parque Ibirapuera . São Paulo· Brasil Patrocínio Oficial Governo Federal Presidente José Sarney Ministério da Cultura Aluísio Pimenta, Ministro Ministério das Relações Exteriores Olavo Egydio Setubal, Ministro Governo do Estado de São Paulo Governador André Franco Montara Secretaria de Estado da Cultura Jorge da Cunha Lima, Secretário Prefeitura do Municipio de São Paulo Prefeito Mário Covas Secretaria Municipal da Cultura Gianfrancesco Guarnieri, Secretário • 2 • Fundação Bienal de São Paulo Presidente Perpétuo Diretoria Executiva Francisco Matarazzo Sobrinho (1898/1977) Roberto Muylaert - Presidente Conselho de Honra Mário Pimenta Camargo 1- 10 Vice-Presidente Oscar P. Landmann - Presidente Pedro D'Alessio - 2.0 Vice-Presidente Luiz Femando Rodrigues Alves Henrique Pereira Gomes Luiz Diederichsen Villares João Augusto Pereira de Queiroz João Marino Stella Teixeira de Barros Conselho de Administração Thomaz Jorge Farkas José E. Mindlin - Presidente Comissão de Arte e Cultura Ermelino Matarazzo - Vice-Presidente Sábato Antonio Magaldi - Presidente Aldo Calvo João Marino - Representante da Benedito José Soares de Mello Pati Diretoria Executiva Ema Gordon Klabin Erich Humberg Casimiro Xavier de Mendonça Francisco Luiz de Almeida Salles Fábio Luiz Pereira de Magalhães Hasso Weiszflog Glauco Pinto de Moraes João Fernando de Almeida Prado Representante da Secretaria Municipal Justo Pinheiro da Fonseca de Cultura e .Associação Profissional Oscar P. Landmann de Artista Piásticos de S.P. Oswaldo Arthur Bratke Oswaldo Silva Luiz Diederichsen Villares Roberto Pinto de Souza Renina Katz Sábato Antonio Magaldi Representante da Associação Sebastião Almeida Prado Sampaio Profissional de Artistas Plásticos de S.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering the Contemporary
    of formalist distance upon which modernists had relied for understanding the world. Critics increasingly pointed to a correspondence between the formal properties of 1960s art and the nature of the radically changing world that sur- rounded them. In fact formalism, the commitment to prior- itizing formal qualities of a work of art over its content, was being transformed in these years into a means of discovering content. Leo Steinberg described Rauschenberg’s work as “flat- bed painting,” one of the lasting critical metaphors invented 1 in response to the art of the immediate post-World War II Discovering the Contemporary period.5 The collisions across the surface of Rosenquist’s painting and the collection of materials on Rauschenberg’s surfaces were being viewed as models for a new form of realism, one that captured the relationships between people and things in the world outside the studio. The lesson that formal analysis could lead back into, rather than away from, content, often with very specific social significance, would be central to the creation and reception of late-twentieth- century art. 1.2 Roy Lichtenstein, Golf Ball, 1962. Oil on canvas, 32 32" (81.3 1.1 James Rosenquist, F-111, 1964–65. Oil on canvas with aluminum, 10 86' (3.04 26.21 m). The Museum of Modern Art, New York. 81.3 cm). Courtesy The Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. New Movements and New Metaphors Purchase Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Alex L. Hillman and Lillie P. Bliss Bequest (both by exchange). Acc. n.: 473.1996.a-w. Artists all over the world shared U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2004 Professor Caroline A. Jones Lecture Notes History, Theory and Criticism Section, Department of Architecture Week 9, Lecture 2
    MIT 4.602, Modern Art and Mass Culture (HASS-D) Spring 2004 Professor Caroline A. Jones Lecture Notes History, Theory and Criticism Section, Department of Architecture Week 9, Lecture 2 PHOTOGRAPHY, PROPAGANDA, MONTAGE: Soviet Avant-Garde “We are all primitives of the 20th century” – Ivan Kliun, 1916 UNOVIS members’ aims include the “study of the system of Suprematist projection and the designing of blueprints and plans in accordance with it; ruling off the earth’s expanse into squares, giving each energy cell its place in the overall scheme; organization and accommodation on the earth’s surface of all its intrinsic elements, charting those points and lines out of which the forms of Suprematism will ascend and slip into space.” — Ilya Chashnik , 1921 I. Making “Modern Man” A. Kasimir Malevich – Suprematism 1) Suprematism begins ca. 1913, influenced by Cubo-Futurism 2) Suprematism officially launched, 1915 – manifesto and exhibition titled “0.10 The Last Futurist Exhibition” in Petrograd. B. El (Elazar) Lissitzky 1) “Proun” as utopia 2) Types, and the new modern man C. Modern Woman? 1) Sonia Terk Delaunay in Paris a) “Orphism” or “organic Cubism” 1911 b) “Simultaneous” clothing, ceramics, textiles, cars 1913-20s 2) Natalia Goncharova, “Rayonism” 3) Lyubov Popova, Varvara Stepanova stage designs II. Monuments without Beards -- Vladimir Tatlin A. Constructivism (developed in parallel with Suprematism as sculptural variant) B. Productivism (the tweaking of “l’art pour l’art” to be more socialist) C. Monument to the Third International (Tatlin’s Tower), 1921 III. Collapse of the Avant-Garde? A. 1937 Paris Exposition, 1937 Entartete Kunst, 1939 Popular Front B.
    [Show full text]
  • Karsten, C.J.F
    Nummer Toegang: KARS Karsten, C.J.F. (Charles Jean Francois) / Archief Het Nieuwe Instituut (c) 2000 This finding aid is written in Dutch. 2 Karsten, C.J.F. (Charles Jean Francois) / Archief KARS KARS Karsten, C.J.F. (Charles Jean Francois) / Archief 3 INHOUDSOPGAVE BESCHRIJVING VAN HET ARCHIEF......................................................................5 Aanwijzingen voor de gebruiker.......................................................................6 Citeerinstructie............................................................................................6 Openbaarheidsbeperkingen.........................................................................6 Archiefvorming.................................................................................................7 Geschiedenis van het archiefbeheer............................................................7 Geschiedenis van de archiefvormer.............................................................7 Karsten, Charles Jean François.................................................................7 Manier van ordenen.........................................................................................9 Verwant materiaal..........................................................................................11 BESCHRIJVING VAN DE SERIES EN ARCHIEFBESTANDDELEN........................................13 KARS.110512093 A: Persoonlijke opdrachten................................................13 KARS.110634531 Diversen...................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • CUBISM and ABSTRACTION Background
    015_Cubism_Abstraction.doc READINGS: CUBISM AND ABSTRACTION Background: Apollinaire, On Painting Apollinaire, Various Poems Background: Magdalena Dabrowski, "Kandinsky: Compositions" Kandinsky, Concerning the Spiritual in Art Background: Serial Music Background: Eugen Weber, CUBISM, Movements, Currents, Trends, p. 254. As part of the great campaign to break through to reality and express essentials, Paul Cezanne had developed a technique of painting in almost geometrical terms and concluded that the painter "must see in nature the cylinder, the sphere, the cone:" At the same time, the influence of African sculpture on a group of young painters and poets living in Montmartre - Picasso, Braque, Max Jacob, Apollinaire, Derain, and Andre Salmon - suggested the possibilities of simplification or schematization as a means of pointing out essential features at the expense of insignificant ones. Both Cezanne and the Africans indicated the possibility of abstracting certain qualities of the subject, using lines and planes for the purpose of emphasis. But if a subject could be analyzed into a series of significant features, it became possible (and this was the great discovery of Cubist painters) to leave the laws of perspective behind and rearrange these features in order to gain a fuller, more thorough, view of the subject. The painter could view the subject from all sides and attempt to present its various aspects all at the same time, just as they existed-simultaneously. We have here an attempt to capture yet another aspect of reality by fusing time and space in their representation as they are fused in life, but since the medium is still flat the Cubists introduced what they called a new dimension-movement.
    [Show full text]
  • How Language Looks: on Asger Jorn and Noël Arnaud's La Langue Verte*
    How Language Looks: On Asger Jorn and No ël Arnaud’s La Langue verte* STEVEN HARRIS In November 1968, the Paris publisher Jean-Jacques Pauvert brought out Asger Jorn and Noël Arnaud’s La Langue verte et la cuite , an event accompanied by a banquet for 2,000 at a Danish restaurant in Paris, and a considerable response from the press, though the book has largely dropped from view since. 1 Initially titled La Langue crue et la cuite , the book was written in French by artist Asger Jorn, founding member of Cobra and of the Situationist International, and revised by Arnaud, member of the Surrealist “Main à plume” group in occupied Paris, founding member of the Revolutionary Surrealist group in postwar Paris (with which Jorn was also involved), and later regent in the Collège de ’Pataphysique. 2 Jorn, in addition to writing the text, also chose the illustrations, while Arnaud added sections of his own and reordered the material in collaboration with Jorn. It is thus the collective labor of two individuals who had first met in Paris in 1946, and who were both involved in the Revolutionary Surrealist group, a splinter group of Communist persuasion that had seceded from the main body of the Surrealist group shortly before the opening of its exhibition Le Surréalisme en 1947 , at the Galerie Maeght. If Cobra was very much ori - ented against Arnaud when it was first formed in 1948, the paths of the two men crossed numerous times in subsequent years. Jorn turned to Arnaud as a trusted friend who was in in sympathy with his aims, who corrected Jorn’s rather casual French, and who in general was willing to lend a hand to the enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Karel Appel Object Paintings Goethestraße 2/3, 10623 Berlin Until 3 April 2021
    Karel Appel Object Paintings Goethestraße 2/3, 10623 Berlin until 3 April 2021 Galerie Max Hetzler is pleased to announce a solo exhibition of sculptures by Karel Appel at Goethestraße 2/3, in Berlin. In important literature on the artist, Karel Appel (1921-2006), who would have celebrated his centennial this year, is consistently referred to as a painter and founding member of CoBrA. The fact that the avant-garde group lasted only three years, and that this period thus actually grasps a relatively brief episode at the beginning of Appel's long career, is usually overlooked. Likewise, few are aware that Appel expressed himself not only in a painterly manner, but also in three dimensions. It is true that he was frst and foremost a painter, and his forays into objecthood are mostly based on a painterly rather than sculptural approach, but this is Karel Appel, Singing Donkeys, 1992 precisely where their particular appeal lies: they apply painterly thinking photo: def image onto the object, and for this reason Appel's sculptures are known as 'Object Paintings'. In the beginning, before CoBrA, his excursions into this medium were largely dictated by necessity: having returned to Amsterdam from his hiding place in the provinces after the war, Appel had to limit himself to what was available. These were not expensive canvases and oil paint, but found objects, and when lucky, some plaster. Yet, even in these early works, oscillating somewhere between relief and sculpture, a main element of his painterly engagement with the object-like manifests itself: a found object sparks the artist's imagination, which he then unleashes onto the object.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Mertz 1920 - 1990 (Born in Copenhagen, Died in Slagelse, Denmark)
    Albert Mertz 1920 - 1990 (Born in Copenhagen, died in Slagelse, Denmark) EDUCATION 1936-1938 Royal Danish Academy under Aksel Jørgensen, Copenhagen 1979-1990 Professor at the Royal Danish Academy, Copenhagen SELECTED SOLO EXHIBITIONS 2015 Heerup and Mertz, Scratch – Avantgarde, Sorø Artmuseum, Denmark (forthcoming) Meet Albert Mertz, Freddy Gallery, Baltimore, U.S.A. Albert Mertz Inside Out, curated by Christian Foghmar, Galleri Tom Christoffersen, Copenhagen 2014 Watch Red-blue TV, Tif Sigfrids, Los Angeles 2013 Døren er åben, book edited by Absalon Kirkeby and Kasper Hesselbjerg, Andersen’s Contemporary, Copenhagen Albert Mertz at Tif’s Desk, curated by Tif Sigfrids and Joachim Hamoud, Castillo Corrales, Paris 2011 Det gennemsigtige spejl/ The transparent mirror, Albert Mertz og Lone Mertz, Stalke Galleri, Kirke Sonnerup, Denmark 2009 Albert Mertz: Works, Andersen’s Contemporary, Copenhagen Albert Mertz: Works, Project Room, Andersen’s Contemporary, Berlin 2007 Duer ikke? Næste!, Den Frie Udstilling, Copenhagen 2005 Albert Mertz, Shering FineArts, Berlin Mertz+, curated by Peter Horst Henckel, Galleri Kirke Sonnerup - catalogue 2001 Albert Mertz, Gouacher fra 80’erne, Galleri Jespersen, Odense Why Blue – Why Red, Gallery Kambur, Island, Denmark Arbejder fra et langt liv I kunstens tjeneste, Stalke Galleri, Copenhagen 1999 Total Mertz, Kunsthalle Nikolaj, Copenhagen Doku Mertz, Kunstmuseet Køge Skitsesamling, Køge, Denmark Mertz Rum, Esbjerg Kunstmuseum (reconstructions made by Lone Mertz), Esbjerg, Denmark 1507 Wilcox Avenue Los Angeles
    [Show full text]
  • Karel Appel Born 1921 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands Biography Died 2006 in Zurich, Switzerland
    Karel Appel Born 1921 in Amsterdam, The Netherlands Biography Died 2006 in Zurich, Switzerland Education 1942 Royal Academy of Fine Arts, Amsterdam Solo Exhibitions 2019 ‘Figures et Paysages’, Almine Rech, Paris, France ‘Karel Appel : Late Nudes, 1985-1997’, Max Hetzler Gallery, Berlin, Germany 2018 ‘Tête en carton. Collagen 1960 - 1967’, Jahn und Jahn, Munich ‘Out of Nature’, Blum & Poe, Los Angeles 2017 ‘Works on Paper 1945-2006’, Galerie Ulysses, Vienna ‘L’art est une fête !’, Musée d’Art moderne de la Ville de Paris 2016 ‘Der abstrakte Blick’, Emil Schumacher Museum Hagen, Germany ‘A Gesture of Color. Paintings and Sculptures, 1947-2004’, The Phillips Collection, Washington ‘Paintings from Six Decades, Galerie Ulysses, Vienna ‘Karel Appel Retrospectief / Karel Appel Retrospective’, Gemeentemuseum Den Haag, The Hague ‘Reset’, Slewe Gallery, Amsterdam 2015 ‘Works on paper’, Musée national d’art moderne – Centre Pompidou, Paris 2014 ‘Karel Appel’, Blum & Poe, New York 2013 ‘I do not paint, I hit!’, Museum Jorn, Silkeborg, Denmark ‘Paintings, Drawings and Sculpture’, Galerie Ulysses, Vienna 2011 ‘Karel Appel & Van Gogh’, Vincent van Gogh Huis, Zundert, The Netherlands 2010 ‘Paintings from five Decades’, Galerie Ulysses, Vienna 64 rue de Turenne, 75003 Paris 18 avenue de Matignon, 75008 Paris 2009 [email protected] ‘Peintures 2000–2001’, Galerie Lelong, Paris - Abdijstraat 20 rue de l’Abbaye Brussel 1050 Bruxelles 2008 [email protected] ‘The Sixties’, Galerie Ulysses, Vienna - Grosvenor Hill, Broadbent House ‘Jazz
    [Show full text]
  • Art Turns. World Turns
    Art Turns. World Turns. Exploring the Collection of The Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art in Nusantara 4 November 2017 — 18 March 2018 Daftar Isi Published for Art Turns. World Turns. Exploring the Collection of the Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art in Nusantara, an exhibition organized by the Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art in Nusantara ( Museum MACAN ) Content and held on 4 November 2017 to 18 March 2018 Publisher : The Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art in Nusantara (Museum MACAN) AKR Tower, Level MM Jl. Panjang No. 5 Kebon Jeruk Jakarta Barat 11530, Indonesia Phone. +62 21 2212 1888 10 96 Email. [email protected] www.museummacan.org Sekapur Sirih Karya Foreword Plates Curators: Charles Esche and Agung Hujatnika — Fenessa Adikoesoemo Copyright Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art in Nusantara, 2017 14 192 Buku ini memiliki hak cipta. Dilarang menerbitkan ulang sebagian atau seluruhnya tanpa ijin tertulis dari penerbit. Tidak ada ilustrasi dalam publikasi ini yang dapat Pengantar Katalog Karya diterbitkan ulang tanpa ijin pemilik hak cipta. Seluruh permintaan yang berkaitan Introduction Catalog of Works dengan penerbitan ulang dan hak cipta harus ditujukan kepada penerbit. — Aaron Seeto This work is copyright. No part may be reproduced without prior written permission from the publisher. No illustration in this publication may be reproduced without the permission of the copyright owners. Requests and inquiries concerning reproductions 20 200 and rights should be addressed to the publisher. Seni Berubah. Dunia Berubah. Ucapan Terima Kasih Hak cipta atas seluruh teks dalam publikasi ini dimiliki para penulis dan Museum MACAN. Art Turns. World Turns.
    [Show full text]