Former County of West Yorkshire
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Faecal Bacteria Data from Samples Collected on the 24Th August 2020
Faecal bacteria data from samples collected on the 24th August 2020 iWHARFE Improving water quality on the River Wharfe from Oughtershaw to the Ouse A citizen science project Faecal bacteria data from samples collected on the 24th August 2020 iWharfe is a citizen science project. It involves members of communities along the Wharfe valley, working together with the Environment Agency, Yorkshire Water and other agencies. It is funded by local donations and grants. The project was designed to provide a snapshot of water quality condi- tions along the entire length of the river on a single day and to raise awareness about water quality issues both for people and wildlife. Water samples were collected on the 24th August 2020. Here we report on results from samples analysed for faecal bacteria, the organisms in wastewater that cause gastro-intestinal illness. Executive Summary 1. The R. Wharfe “Big Health Check” on the 24th August 2020 involved five teams of citizen scien- tists taking water samples from 60 sites along the R. Wharfe at approximately the same time on the same day. 2. Although riverflow was relatively high, conditions were similar along the full length of the river. 3. Samples for faecal bacteria analysis were stored in cool boxes and hand-delivered to a collection point in Wakefield. They were analysed for E. coli and Intestinal Enterococci (IE) at ALS Ltd Cov- entry, an accredited microbiology laboratory, within 24 hours of sampling. 4. The results showed high concentrations of both E. coli and IE at sites between Buckden and Barden Bridge in Upper Wharfedale and at Beanlands Island in Ilkley, relatively low concentra- tions in Langstrothdale and in the stretch from Bolton Abbey to Ilkley Suspension Bridge, and var- iable concentrations downstream from Burley to the Ouse confluence at Cawood. -
Church Fenton Neighbourhood Development Plan • 2020 •
1. HEADING CHURCH FENTON NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN • 2020 • SUBMISSION DRAFT CONTENTS FOREWORD ________________________________________________________________________ 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION _______________________________________________________________ 5 1.1 Background to the Neighbourhood Development Plan ______________________________5 1.2 Consultation and engagement __________________________________________________5 1.3 The Neighbourhood Planning process ____________________________________________5 2.0 A BRIEF HISTORY AND CHURCH FENTON TODAY ___________________________________ 8 3.0 VISION AND OBJECTIVES ______________________________________________________ 10 3.1 The Vision for Church Fenton to 2027: ___________________________________________10 3.2 Objectives _________________________________________________________________10 4.0 POLICIES ____________________________________________________________________ 11 4.1 Housing ___________________________________________________________________12 4.2. Amenities and Services (AS) ___________________________________________________22 4.3 Business and Economy (BE) ___________________________________________________26 4.4 Environment and Green Spaces (EGS) ___________________________________________28 4.5 Conservation and Heritage (CH) ________________________________________________38 4.6 Flooding (F) ________________________________________________________________42 4.7 New Rail Infrastructure (NR) ___________________________________________________46 5.0 POLICIES MAPS ______________________________________________________________ -
Own-Brand Food, Homewares, Health and Beauty
Total Number % of Female % of Male Worker Buying Group ZS Number Site name Address Country of Workers Workers Workers Representation Morrisons Food ZS1000075 Single Source Stafford Park 6, Telford, TF3 3AT United Kingdom 120 58% 42% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1000097 Huegli UK Ltd Oxleasow Road, Redditch, B98 0RE United Kingdom 99 51% 49% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1000985 Oakham Ales - Maxwell Road Maxwell Road, Woodston, Peterborough, PE2 7JB United Kingdom 40 23% 78% No Morrisons Food ZS1000990 Fromageries Papillon Impasse de la Route de Tiergues, Lauras, Roquefort Sur Soulzon, 12250 France 83 48% 52% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1001380 Mademoiselle Desserts - Valade Lieu Dit Valade, Condat Sur Trincou, 24530 France 500 46% 54% Yes Morrisons Non-Food ZS1001455 Kim Duc Vinh Loc 2 Industrial Zone, Long Hiep Commune, Ben Luc District, Long An Province, 850000 Vietnam 800 60% 40% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1001947 Alimentos Sumar S.A. - El Tejar Carretera Interamericana, El Tejar, 1 Guatemala 230 65% 35% No Morrisons Food ZS1002139 Konspol Bis Poznańska Street, Slupca, 62-400 Poland 939 59% 41% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1002164 Place UK Ltd Church Farm, Tunstead, Norwich, NR12 8RQ United Kingdom 577 38% 62% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1002170 TH21 - Minburi Suwinthawong Rd, Sansab, Minburi, Bangkok, 10510 Thailand 1360 61% 39% No Morrisons Food ZS1002195 Baronie UK Darwin Road, Willowbrook Industrial Estate, Corby, NN17 5XZ United Kingdom 136 54% 46% Yes Morrisons Food ZS1002269 Valeo Confectionary - Liverpool Beech Street, Liverpool, L7 0HA United Kingdom 184 41% 59% Yes -
Land West of Street 5, Thorp Arch Estate, Wetherby Application Ref: 16/05226/Ot
Our ref: APP/N4720/W/17/3168897 Ms Kate Thompson Your ref: EMS.2738 Pegasus Planning Group 4 The Courtyard Lockington Derby DE74 2SL 12 July 2018 Dear Madam TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 APPEAL MADE BY ROCKSPRING HANOVER PROPERTY UNIT TRUST LAND WEST OF STREET 5, THORP ARCH ESTATE, WETHERBY APPLICATION REF: 16/05226/OT 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of Richard Clegg BA(Hons) DMS MRTPI, who held a public local inquiry between 12-15, 19-22 and 26-29 September and 20-24 and 27 November 2017 into your client’s appeal against the failure of Leeds City Council to determine your client’s application for outline planning permission for up to 874 dwellings (a maximum of 840 dwellings with two or more bedrooms); a 66 bed care home; a one form entry primary school; a new local centre including a class A1 convenience store (up to 420m2), a five unit parade of small retail units (up to 400m2), and class D1 uses (up to 750m2); on-site open space, including areas for both public access and biodiversity enhancements; together with associated highway and drainage and infrastructure, in accordance with application ref: 16/05226/OT, dated 10 August 2016. 2. On 27 February 2017, this appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of, and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to, the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. -
REGISTER of SPONSORS (Tiers 2 & 5 and Sub Tiers Only)
REGISTER OF SPONSORS (Tiers 2 & 5 and Sub Tiers Only) DATE: 09-January-2017 Register of Sponsors Licensed Under the Points-based System This is a list of organisations licensed to sponsor migrants under Tiers 2 & 5 of the Points-Based System. It shows the organisation's name (in alphabetical order), the sub tier(s) they are licensed for, and their rating against each sub tier. A sponsor may be licensed under more than one tier, and may have different ratings for each tier. No. of Sponsors on Register Licensed under Tiers 2 and 5: 29,794 Organisation Name Town/City County Tier & Rating Sub Tier ?What If! Ltd London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General Tier 2 (A rating) Intra Company Transfers (ICT) @ Home Accommodation Services Ltd London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General Tier 5 (A rating) Creative & Sporting ]performance s p a c e [ london london Tier 5 (A rating) Creative & Sporting 01 Telecom Limited Brighton Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 0-two Maintenance London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 1 Stop Print Ltd Ilford Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 1 Tech LTD London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 10 Europe Limited Edinburgh Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General Tier 2 (A rating) Intra Company Transfers (ICT) 10 GROUP LTD T/A THE 10 GROUP LONDON Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 10 Minutes With Limited London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General Page 1 of 1952 Organisation Name Town/City County Tier & Rating Sub Tier 1000heads Ltd London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 1000mercis LTD London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 100Starlings Ltd -
Linton (Wetherby)
Wetherby/Linton ‘Tithe to 2009’ Boundary Trail Type of Walk: Circular, including river and woodland paths Distance: 2 miles Starting Point: Wetherby Leisure Centre carpark, Lodge Lane, Wetherby (SE400 478) Suitable for: Walking only Trail Summary: This trail begins in the 19th-century township of Linton, in modern Wetherby, at the Wetherby Leisure Centre on Lodge Lane. It then follows the south bank of the river Wharfe, marking the 19th-century Linton/Wetherby tithe boundary, as far as Wetherby Bridge. After crossing the bridge into Wetherby township, the trail snakes through the centre of the settlement via High Street, passing many buildings visible on the 1838 tithe map of the area. Finally, the route cuts into the disused rail-bed, north of the town, and follows its path around Wetherby’s western edge, crossing back into Linton and returning along the south bank of the river Wharfe, to the Wetherby Leisure Centre carpark. Wetherby Trail Water Wooded area Built-up area Roads © Crown copyright. All rights reserved. Wakefi eld MDC 100019574. 2009 47 Directions Begin at Wetherby Leisure Centre carpark, situated on land appearing on the 1838 Wetherby tithe map as fl ood plains yielding no tithe. Go across Lodge Lane, and walk to your right. Follow the footpath as far as Wetherby Bridge. In turning left onto Wetherby Bridge, you cross into the fi rst mapped area of the township’s 19th-century tithe map. Go halfway across the bridge and pause at its centre, turning to look upstream, to your left. Ahead you will note a modern weir, and to its left, a salmon leap. -
Otley Bridge, Otley, Leeds Conservation Management
OTLEY BRIDGE, OTLEY, LEEDS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by: Kathryn Sather & Associates, Architectural Conservation Consultants, 25, Oldfield Road, ALTRINCHAM. WA14 4EQ Tel: 0161 941 1414 REVISED DRAFT October 2006 Otley Bridge, Otley, Leeds: Conservation Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Background Information .....................................3 Section 2 Understanding the Site........................................4 2.1 Development of Otley Bridge..............................4 2.2 Historical and Social Context............................23 2.3 Management Information .................................32 Section 3 Statement of Significance .................................34 3.1 Overview of Significance ..................................34 3.2 Schedule of Significance..................................35 Section 4 Issues and Vulnerability....................................36 Section 5 Conservation Management Policies.................38 5.1 Conservation Policy Aims.................................38 5.2 A Conservation Philosophy ..............................38 5.3 Appropriate Uses .............................................39 5.4 Priorities for Repair and Conservation..............39 5.5 The Conservation Management Policies ..........40 Section 6 Maintenance Plan...............................................44 Section 7 Sources ..............................................................45 Appendix 1: Articles of Agreement for Repair of Bridge, 1775. 47 Appendix 2: Scheduled Monument Record ...............................50 -
2003 October Newsletter
Autumn 2003 Newsletter Wetherby Civic Society Autumn Newsletter October 2003 VICE-CHAIRMAN'S REPORT - James Lodge Civic Society received a very extended to Chris and Janet and sad blow when our Chairman, Mike was an active member of their respective families. Mike Welby, was suddenly the Society’s planning sub- struck with a very severe illness, committee and ultimately its I hope many of you took which resulted in his recent Chairman. He was much advantage of the Heritage Open death. Mike had stepped in at concerned that new Days weekend in September. short notice and was good hard developments in the town should This is when many places not working chairman who we had respect the historic core and not normally open to the public can hoped would have been with us overwhelm the modest limestone be seen free. Sadly Wetherby for years to come. buildings, which make up most does not possess buildings or of the town centre. churches of real interest. We In particular he fully realised had hoped to take people to see that we were part of Leeds City He was saddened to see litter the Georgian Bathhouse at and should take advantage of despoiling the town and pressed Wharfedale Lawn which is now any Leeds projects which might hard for the authorities to take leased to the Town Council. help us. He saw the advantages action in its eradication. He Unfortunately, neither the of becoming an active member was keen to make the Society bathhouse nor the grounds were of Leeds Voice - the relevant to the life of the town up to the standard we expect in organisation which co-ordinates and to seek contacts with other Wetherby. -
North Eastern Railway Civil Engineering Drawings List
North Eastern Railway Civil Engineering Drawings List Description: The collection includes a minority of architectural plans, along with drawings of structures such as bridges and viaducts, maps of permanent way routes and alterations, signalling plans and diagrams, with a variety of miscellaneous components for structures and infrastructure. The collection comprises approximately 3500 plans, diagrams and maps on paper, wax linen and linen- backed cartridge paper. System of arrangement: The original arrangement of the drawings has been lost and they derive from a wide variety of applications within the architectural and civil engineering genres. The drawings have therefore been listed in the rolls in which they were found, and every effort made to record the variety of numbering systems used at different times by the railway company departments involved in creating and storing the drawings, representative of the different types of drawing. There is no one single and consistent numbering arrangement. Physical Characteristics: The drawings survive in a variety of formats and sizes – there are wax linen tracings, colour washed linenbacked original office drawings, drawings on cartridge paper, blueprints and other copying processes. Administrative/Biographical History: The North Eastern Railway Company was formed in 1854 as an amalgamation of the York & North Midland Railway, the Leeds Northern Railway and the York, Newcastle & Berwick Railway. It continued to absorb other companies in the north eastern region of England over subsequent decades, including the Stockton & Darlington Railway, South Durham and Lancashire Union Railway and the West Hartlepool Railway. In 1923 the various railway companies of the United Kingdom were grouped into four large amalgamations. -
Morrisons Own-Brand Food, Homewares, Health and Beauty
Total Number % of Female % of Male Trade Union/ Buying Group Site Name Address Country of workers workers workers Workers Committee Morrisons Food 2 Sisters Food Group - Grimsby Unit 1, Pegasus Way, Grimsby, DN37 9TS United Kingdom 352 26% 74% Yes Morrisons Food 2 Sisters Food Group - Coupar Angus George Street, Coupar Angus, Coupar Angus, PH13 9LU United Kingdom 536 35% 65% Yes Morrisons Food Fox's Biscuits - Batley Wellington Street, Batley, West Yorkshire, WF17 5JE United Kingdom 993 35% 65% Yes Morrisons Food Green Isle Foods - Portumna IDA Industrial Estate, Portumna, Co. Galway, H53HY74 Ireland 200 41% 59% Yes Morrisons Food Matthew Walker Heanor Gate Road, Heanor, Derbyshire, DE75 7RJ United Kingdom 266 50% 50% Yes Morrisons Food AAK Foods - Hull King George Dock, Hull, HU9 5PX United Kingdom 424 22% 78% Yes Morrisons Food AAK Foods - Davy Road Davy Road, Astmoor Industrial Estate, WA7 1PZ United Kingdom 202 34% 66% No Morrisons Food Abergavenny Fine Foods Ltd Creamery Castle Meadows Park, Abergavenny, NP7 7RZ United Kingdom 22 23% 77% Yes Morrisons Food Abergavveny Fine Foods Ltd - Blaenavon Unit 7, Gilchrist Thomas Industrial Estate, Blaenavon, NP49RL United Kingdom 107 40% 60% Yes Morrisons Food Eatwell Foods Unit 7 Randles Road, Knowsley Business Park South, Liverpool, L34 9HX United Kingdom 53 30% 70% No Morrisons Food WA Turner Broadwater Lane, Tunbridge Wells, Tunbridge Wells, TN2 5RD United Kingdom 390 35% 65% Yes Morrisons Food Aceites Maeva - Site 1 Parque metropolitano. Avd. Incar nº8, Escúzar, Granada, 18130 Spain 91 -
Post Opening Project Evaluation
Post Opening Project Evaluation A1(M) Bramham to Wetherby Five Years After Opening Study November 2015 Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Highways England’s information and use in relation to the Post Opening Project Evaluation of Major Schemes. Atkins assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. Post Opening Project Evaluation A1(M) Bramham to Wetherby Five Years After Opening Study Table of Contents Chapter Pages Executive Summary 4 Scheme Description 4 Scheme Objectives 4 Summary of Scheme Impacts 5 1. Introduction 8 Background 8 Scheme Objectives 11 Highways England Appraisal Process 12 Post Opening Project Evaluation 12 Summary of the A1(M) Bramham to Wetherby Scheme One Year After Study 12 Report Structure 13 2. Traffic Impact Analysis 14 Introduction 14 Traffic Volume Analysis 16 Forecast vs. Outturn Traffic Flows 24 Vehicle Speed Analysis 28 Forecast Journey Times 30 Route Stress 30 3. Safety 32 Introduction 32 Sources 32 Background Changes in Collision Reduction 33 Collision Numbers 34 NMU Collisions 39 Collision Rates 41 Collision Locations 41 Road Safety Audit Findings 43 Fatalities and Weighted Injuries 43 Forecast vs. Observed Collision Savings 44 Personal Security 45 4. Economy 47 Introduction 47 Sources 47 Scheme Benefits 47 Transport Economic Efficiency 48 Collision Benefits 49 Present Value Benefits 50 Scheme Costs 51 Present Value Costs 52 Benefit Cost Ratio 52 Wider Economic Impact 53 5. Environment 55 Introduction 55 Methodology 58 Data Collection 58 Site Visit 59 2 Post Opening Project Evaluation A1(M) Bramham to Wetherby Five Years After Opening Study Consultation 59 Traffic Forecast Evaluation 60 Noise 61 Local Air Quality 62 Greenhouse Gases 63 Landscape/Townscape 64 Heritage 73 Biodiversity 75 Water Quality and Drainage 79 Physical Fitness 85 Journey Ambience 88 6. -
(Public Pack)Agenda Document for Outer North East Community
Public Document Pack Outer North East Community Committee Alwoodley, Harewood, Wetherby Meeting to be held in The Deighton Room, Wetherby Town Hall, Market Place, Wetherby, LS22 6NE Monday, 12th December, 2016 at 5.30 pm Councillors: N Buckley Alwoodley; D Cohen Alwoodley; P Harrand Alwoodley; R Procter Harewood; M Robinson Harewood; R. Stephenson Harewood; A Lamb Wetherby; J Procter Wetherby; G Wilkinson Wetherby; Co-optees Agenda compiled by: John Grieve 0113 224 3836 Governance Services Unit, Civic Hall, LEEDS LS1 1UR East North East Area Leader: Jane Maxwell Tel: 336 7627 Images on cover from left to right: Alwoodley - MAECare (Moor Allerton Elderly Care); Moor Allerton shopping centre Harewood - rural landscapes; Harewood Arms Wetherby – bridge over the River Wharfe; racehorse sculpture B A G E N D A Item Ward/Equal Item Not Page No Opportunities Open No 1 APPEALS AGAINST REFUSAL OF INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS To consider any appeals in accordance with Procedure Rule 15.2 of the Access to Information Procedure Rules (in the event of an Appeal the press and public will be excluded). (*In accordance with Procedure Rule 15.2, written notice of an appeal must be received by the Head of Governance Services at least 24 hours before the meeting.) 2 EXEMPT INFORMATION - POSSIBLE EXCLUSION OF THE PRESS AND PUBLIC 1 To highlight reports or appendices which officers have identified as containing exempt information, and where officers consider that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information, for the reasons outlined in the report. 2 To consider whether or not to accept the officers recommendation in respect of the above information.