THE MASONRY TECHNIQUES of a HISTORICAL BRIDGE in HYPOKREMNOS (İÇMELER) (1) Funda UYGUN GENÇER*, Mine HAMAMCIOĞLU TURAN*
THEMETU MASONRY JFA 2017/1 TECHNIQUES OF A HISTORICAL BRIDGE DOI:METU 10.4305/METU.JFA.2017.1.6 JFA 2017/1 187 (34:1) 187-207 THE MASONRY TECHNIQUES OF A HISTORICAL BRIDGE IN HYPOKREMNOS (İÇMELER) (1) Funda UYGUN GENÇER*, Mine HAMAMCIOĞLU TURAN* Received: 13.11.2014; Final Text: 27.10.2016 INTRODUCTION Keywords: Historical bridges, masonry techniques, Hypokremnos (6494 words). Characteristics of the site and date of construction are the primary parameters that determine the form and construction techniques of 1. This study was based on Master’s Thesis entitled Photogrammetric Evaluation viaducts. In Roman, Byzantine, Seljuk and Ottoman periods, masonry Options for Ancient Structures in structure in linear form carried with one or series of arches was the basic Hypokremnos, Pagos, Paradiso and Nysa by Funda Uygun in Architectural Restoration theme of the viaducts (Tanyeli, 2000). Department, Faculty of Architecture, İzmir Institute of Technology, İzmir. There are a number of studies on bridges of Anatolia constructed in a 2. Bozkurt (1952), İlter (1966, 1971), İşmen specific period or region 2( ). In these studies, however, information on (1967), Çulpan (1975), Tunç (1978), Arıoğlu construction techniques and material usage is limited. and Anadol (1979), İlter (1978), Çeçen (1988), Öziş (1991). Eyüce (1998), Tanyeli (2000), This study aims to identify elements, construction techniques and material Sözen (2000), Türkiye Karayolları Genel Müdürlüğü (2008), Ural et al. (2008) and usage of a historical bridge in İçmeler, Urla, İzmir. Urla, which is a Canitez et al. (2009). historical settlement on the west of the metropolitan city of İzmir, is an important transition point between Karaburun-Çeşme Peninsula and the mainland of Anatolia.
[Show full text]