DOCSLIB.ORG

North Gale Landform and the Volcanic Sources of Sediment in Gale

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Gale Landform and the Volcanic Sources of Sediment in Gale North Gale Landform and the Volcanic Sources of Sediment in Gale Crater, Mars By Jeff Churchill, BSc. Brock University Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences Faculty of Earth Sciences, Brock University St. Catharines, Ontario ©2018 i Master of Science (2018) Brock University (Earth Sciences) St Catharines, ON, Canada TITLE: Volcanic Sources of Sediment in Gale Crater, Mars AUTHOR: Jeffrey Churchill, Honours BSc. (Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada, 2016) SUPERVISOR: Professor, Dr. Mariek E. Schmidt COMMITTEE: Dr. Frank Fueten, Dr. Kevin Turner NUMBER OF PAGES: 138 ii Abstract An investigation into the origins of a previously unidentified landform north of Gale Crater, Mars (North Gale Landform, NGL) using remotely sensed datasets and morphological mapping has determined that it is a volcanic construct that collapsed and produced a hummocky terrain deposit to the south. Volcaniclastic sediments have been detected in the sedimentary rocks of Gale Crater by APXS. They can be grouped into distinct classes: Jake_M and Bathurst_Inlet. Jake_M are float rocks and cobbles made of igneous sediments with evolved, alkaline compositions and pitted, dusty surfaces. Bathurst_Inlet are least altered potassic basaltic sediments in siltstone sandstone to matrix-supported conglomerates. Simple petrologic models demonstrate there is a need for more than one distinct crystalline source. Bathurst_Inlet class targets are not mantle melts and Jake_M class targets are not differentiated from Bathurst_Inlet or Adirondack. NGL may be one source for the volcaniclastic sediments in Gale Crater. Key words: Mars, Gale Crater, volcanology, geochemistry, petrological modelling iii Acknowledgements I’d like to thank my thesis supervisor Mariek Schmidt for all the help and support that she has given me for the past 2+ years. Mariek has helped me to live out a dream of mine to work in another planet and hopefully contribute something useful to the planetary science community. I’d like to acknowledge the support, advice and ideas that I have received from the rest of my committee: Frank Fueten, and Kevin Turner. I’d like to thank Jon Walmsley for providing me with the imagery and DEMs to get me started. Thanks to my parents, Jeff and Cathy Churchill, the rest of my family and Emily Jones for putting up with me going to school and living at home for so long, it would not have been possible without you guys. I’d also like to thank the rest of the Earth Science grad students at Brock for giving me advice, bouncing ideas around and letting me distract you guys. This work is supported by a Canadian Space Agency Participating Scientist Grant to Schmidt, a Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship in Science and Technology to Churchill and Brock University Graduate Studies Grants to Churchill. iv Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. viii List of Figures ...................................................................................................................................ix List of Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................... xvi Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Space Exploration ................................................................................................................... 1 Mars Science Laboratory Rover Curiosity .............................................................................. 2 Mars History ........................................................................................................................... 4 Martian Volcanism ................................................................................................................. 8 1.4.1 Redistribution of Volcanic Materials ............................................................................... 9 1.4.2 Collapse Features .......................................................................................................... 12 Gale Crater ........................................................................................................................... 14 Curiosity in Gale Crater ........................................................................................................ 17 Study Purpose ...................................................................................................................... 19 Chapter 2: Volcano and Debris Avalanche Deposit North of Gale Crater, Mars ........................... 20 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 20 2.1.1 Volcaniclastic Sediments in Gale Crater ........................................................................ 21 2.1.2 North Gale Landform .................................................................................................... 22 v 2.1.3 Dichotomy Boundary Landforms .................................................................................. 24 2.1.4 Impact Craters on Mars ................................................................................................ 25 Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 28 Results .................................................................................................................................. 29 2.3.1 NGL Physical Description .............................................................................................. 29 2.3.2 NGL Related Features.................................................................................................... 37 2.3.3 Other Important Units .................................................................................................. 42 2.3.4 Morphological Map ....................................................................................................... 45 2.3.5 Tectonic Trends ............................................................................................................. 47 Discussion ............................................................................................................................. 51 2.4.1 Origin of North Gale Landform ..................................................................................... 52 2.4.2 Origin of Hummocky Terrain ......................................................................................... 68 2.4.3 Volcanic Debris Avalanche ............................................................................................ 71 2.4.4 Implications for Gale Crater Geology ............................................................................ 77 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................... 79 Chapter 3: Volcanic Sources of Sediment in Gale Crater, Mars ..................................................... 83 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 83 3.1.1 Igneous Lithologies ....................................................................................................... 86 Methods ............................................................................................................................... 89 Results .................................................................................................................................. 90 vi Discussion ............................................................................................................................. 99 3.4.1 Models ........................................................................................................................ 103 3.4.2 Partial Melting ............................................................................................................. 105 3.4.3 Fractional Crystallization ............................................................................................. 112 3.4.4 Mineral Accumulation ................................................................................................. 115 3.4.5 Summary of Models .................................................................................................... 117 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 119 Chapter 4: Summary, Final Discussion and Overall Conclusions ................................................. 122 Summary of Previous Chapters .......................................................................................... 122 Final Discussion and Conclusions ....................................................................................... 123 Limitations of Study ........................................................................................................... 127 Future Work ......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planetary Geologic Mappers Annual Meeting
    Program Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 Planetary Geologic Mappers Annual Meeting June 12–14, 2018 • Knoxville, Tennessee Institutional Support Lunar and Planetary Institute Universities Space Research Association Convener Devon Burr Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, University of Tennessee Knoxville Science Organizing Committee David Williams, Chair Arizona State University Devon Burr Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, University of Tennessee Knoxville Robert Jacobsen Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, University of Tennessee Knoxville Bradley Thomson Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, University of Tennessee Knoxville Abstracts for this meeting are available via the meeting website at https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/pgm2018/ Abstracts can be cited as Author A. B. and Author C. D. (2018) Title of abstract. In Planetary Geologic Mappers Annual Meeting, Abstract #XXXX. LPI Contribution No. 2066, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. Guide to Sessions Tuesday, June 12, 2018 9:00 a.m. Strong Hall Meeting Room Introduction and Mercury and Venus Maps 1:00 p.m. Strong Hall Meeting Room Mars Maps 5:30 p.m. Strong Hall Poster Area Poster Session: 2018 Planetary Geologic Mappers Meeting Wednesday, June 13, 2018 8:30 a.m. Strong Hall Meeting Room GIS and Planetary Mapping Techniques and Lunar Maps 1:15 p.m. Strong Hall Meeting Room Asteroid, Dwarf Planet, and Outer Planet Satellite Maps Thursday, June 14, 2018 8:30 a.m. Strong Hall Optional Field Trip to Appalachian Mountains Program Tuesday, June 12, 2018 INTRODUCTION AND MERCURY AND VENUS MAPS 9:00 a.m. Strong Hall Meeting Room Chairs: David Williams Devon Burr 9:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Studies of Martian Channels and Valleys Using Termoskan Data
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 99, NO. El, PAGES 1983-1996, JANUARY 25, 1994 Thermal studiesof Martian channelsand valleys using Termoskan data BruceH. Betts andBruce C. Murray Divisionof Geologicaland PlanetarySciences, California Institute of Technology,Pasadena The Tennoskaninstrument on boardthe Phobos '88 spacecraftacquired the highestspatial resolution thermal infraredemission data ever obtained for Mars. Included in thethermal images are 2 km/pixel,midday observations of severalmajor channel and valley systems including significant portions of Shalbatana,Ravi, A1-Qahira,and Ma'adimValles, the channelconnecting Vailes Marineris with HydraotesChaos, and channelmaterial in Eos Chasma.Tennoskan also observed small portions of thesouthern beginnings of Simud,Tiu, andAres Vailes and somechannel material in GangisChasma. Simultaneousbroadband visible reflectance data were obtainedfor all but Ma'adimVallis. We find thatmost of the channelsand valleys have higher thermal inertias than their surroundings,consistent with previousthermal studies. We show for the first time that the thermal inertia boundariesclosely match flat channelfloor boundaries.Also, butteswithin channelshave inertiassimilar to the plainssurrounding the channels,suggesting the buttesare remnants of a contiguousplains surface. Lower bounds ontypical channel thermal inertias range from 8.4 to 12.5(10 -3 cal cm-2 s-1/2 K-I) (352to 523 in SI unitsof J m-2 s-l/2K-l). Lowerbounds on inertia differences with the surrounding heavily cratered plains range from 1.1 to 3.5 (46 to 147 sr). Atmosphericand geometriceffects are not sufficientto causethe observedchannel inertia enhancements.We favornonaeolian explanations of the overall channel inertia enhancements based primarily upon the channelfloors' thermal homogeneity and the strongcorrelation of thermalboundaries with floor boundaries. However,localized, dark regions within some channels are likely aeolian in natureas reported previously.
    [Show full text]
  • Curiosity's Candidate Field Site in Gale Crater, Mars
    Curiosity’s Candidate Field Site in Gale Crater, Mars K. S. Edgett – 27 September 2010 Simulated view from Curiosity rover in landing ellipse looking toward the field area in Gale; made using MRO CTX stereopair images; no vertical exaggeration. The mound is ~15 km away 4th MSL Landing Site Workshop, 27–29 September 2010 in this view. Note that one would see Gale’s SW wall in the distant background if this were Edgett, 1 actually taken by the Mastcams on Mars. Gale Presents Perhaps the Thickest and Most Diverse Exposed Stratigraphic Section on Mars • Gale’s Mound appears to present the thickest and most diverse exposed stratigraphic section on Mars that we can hope access in this decade. • Mound has ~5 km of stratified rock. (That’s 3 miles!) • There is no evidence that volcanism ever occurred in Gale. • Mound materials were deposited as sediment. • Diverse materials are present. • Diverse events are recorded. – Episodes of sedimentation and lithification and diagenesis. – Episodes of erosion, transport, and re-deposition of mound materials. 4th MSL Landing Site Workshop, 27–29 September 2010 Edgett, 2 Gale is at ~5°S on the “north-south dichotomy boundary” in the Aeolis and Nepenthes Mensae Region base map made by MSSS for National Geographic (February 2001); from MOC wide angle images and MOLA topography 4th MSL Landing Site Workshop, 27–29 September 2010 Edgett, 3 Proposed MSL Field Site In Gale Crater Landing ellipse - very low elevation (–4.5 km) - shown here as 25 x 20 km - alluvium from crater walls - drive to mound Anderson & Bell
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of a Heterogeneous Martian Mantle: Clues from K, P, Ti, Cr, and Ni Variations in Gusev Basalts and Shergottite Meteorites
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 296 (2010) 67–77 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth and Planetary Science Letters journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl The evolution of a heterogeneous Martian mantle: Clues from K, P, Ti, Cr, and Ni variations in Gusev basalts and shergottite meteorites Mariek E. Schmidt a,⁎, Timothy J. McCoy b a Dept. of Earth Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada L2S 3A1 b Dept. of Mineral Sciences, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-0119, USA article info abstract Article history: Martian basalts represent samples of the interior of the planet, and their composition reflects their source at Received 10 December 2009 the time of extraction as well as later igneous processes that affected them. To better understand the Received in revised form 16 April 2010 composition and evolution of Mars, we compare whole rock compositions of basaltic shergottitic meteorites Accepted 21 April 2010 and basaltic lavas examined by the Spirit Mars Exploration Rover in Gusev Crater. Concentrations range from Available online 2 June 2010 K-poor (as low as 0.02 wt.% K2O) in the shergottites to K-rich (up to 1.2 wt.% K2O) in basalts from the Editor: R.W. Carlson Columbia Hills (CH) of Gusev Crater; the Adirondack basalts from the Gusev Plains have more intermediate concentrations of K2O (0.16 wt.% to below detection limit). The compositional dataset for the Gusev basalts is Keywords: more limited than for the shergottites, but it includes the minor elements K, P, Ti, Cr, and Ni, whose behavior Mars igneous processes during mantle melting varies from very incompatible (prefers melt) to very compatible (remains in the shergottites residuum).
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Volcanism in and Near the Chaotic Terrains East of Valles Marineris, Mars
    43rd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2012) 1057.pdf EVIDENCE FOR VOLCANISM IN AND NEAR THE CHAOTIC TERRAINS EAST OF VALLES MARINERIS, MARS. Tanya N. Harrison, Malin Space Science Systems ([email protected]; P.O. Box 910148, San Diego, CA 92191). Introduction: Martian chaotic terrain was first de- ple chaotic regions are visible in CTX images (Figs. scribed by [1] from Mariner 6 and 7 data as a “rough, 1,2). These fractures have widened since the formation irregular complex of short ridges, knobs, and irregular- of the flows. The flows overtop and/or bank up upon ly shaped troughs and depressions,” attributing this pre-existing topography such as crater ejecta blankets morphology to subsidence and suggesting volcanism (Fig. 2c). Flows are also observed originating from as a possible cause. McCauley et al. [2], who were the fractures within some craters in the vicinity of the cha- first to note the presence of large outflow channels that os regions. Potential lava flows are observed on a por- appeared to originate from the chaotic terrains in Mar- tion of the floor as Hydaspis Chaos, possibly associat- iner 9 data, proposed localized geothermal melting ed with fissures on the chaos floor. As in Hydraotes, followed by catastrophic release as the formation these flows bank up against blocks on the chaos floor, mechanism of chaotic terrain. Variants of this model implying that if the flows are volcanic in origin, the have subsequently been detailed by a number of au- volcanism occurred after the formation of Hydaspis thors [e.g. 3,4,5]. Meresse et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance and Contributions of the Green Industry to Utah's Economy
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 5-2021 Performance and Contributions of the Green Industry to Utah's Economy Lara Gale Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports Part of the Regional Economics Commons Recommended Citation Gale, Lara, "Performance and Contributions of the Green Industry to Utah's Economy" (2021). All Graduate Plan B and other Reports. 1551. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports/1551 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Plan B and other Reports by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PERFORMANCE AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE GREEN INDUSTRY TO UTAH’S ECONOMY by Lara Gale A research paper submitted in the partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Applied Economics Approved: ____________________________ ______________________________ Man Keun Kim, Ph.D. Ruby Ward, Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member ____________________________ Larry Rupp, Ph.D. Committee Member UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2021 ii ABSTRACT PERFORMANCE AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE GREEN INDUSTRY TO UTAH’S ECONOMY by Lara Gale, MS in Applied Economics Utah State University, 2021 Major Professor: Dr. Man Keun Kim Department: Applied Economics Landscaping and nursery enterprises, commonly known as green industry enterprises, can be found everywhere in Utah, and are necessary to create both aesthetic appeal and human well-being in the built environment. In order to understand the impact that events such as economic shocks or policy changes may have on the green industry, the baseline performance and contribution of the industry must be specified for comparison following these shocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Detection and Implications of Akaganeite on Mars
    45th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2014) 2364.pdf ORBITAL DETECTION AND IMPLICATIONS OF AKAGANEITE ON MARS. J. Carter1, C. Viviano-Beck2, L. Le Deit3, J. Bishop4, D. Loizeau5, 1IAS (Paris-Sud University, France, [email protected]), 2JHU/APL (Laurel, MD), 3LPGN (Nantes University, France), 4SETI Institute (Mountain View, CA), 5LGL (Lyon 1 University, France). Introduction: Recent orbital and landed investiga- lands, and intertidal marshes; and within hydrothermal tions of the Martian surface have demonstrated that the brines [13,14,15,16]. The main conditions necessary planet underwent a complex geological and aqueous for akaganéite precipitation are high salinity, mild acid- alteration history, fragments of which are recorded in ity (pH ~6), oxidizing conditions, and most important- the mineralogy of the heavily disrupted surface [1,2,3]. ly, high iron (II/III) and chlorine concentrations. On Of particular interest are aqueously altered minerals Earth, the source of Fe in akaganéite formation is typi- that trace warmer and wetter surface environments on cally iron ore or sulfides (the latter also providing acid- Early Mars, some of which also exhibit biogenic for- ity as they dissolve) [15,16]. Highly concentrated chlo- mation pathways [4,5]. rine occurs within volcanic fumaroles or deep sea vents The most abundant alteration minerals on Mars that as well as within evaporating, closed or semi-closed have likely been detected are hydrated silicates, hy- water systems [15,16,17]. drated sulfates, and chloride salts [6,7,8]. The detection of minor phases remains important, however, as they further constrain localized geochemical environments at different epochs in the timeline of Mars’s geological history.
    [Show full text]
  • Discrete Element Modelling of Pit Crater Formation on Mars
    geosciences Article Discrete Element Modelling of Pit Crater Formation on Mars Stuart Hardy 1,2 1 ICREA (Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats), Passeig Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected]; Tel.: +34-934-02-13-76 2 Departament de Dinàmica de la Terra i de l’Oceà, Facultat de Ciències de la Terra, Universitat de Barcelona, C/Martí i Franqués s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain Abstract: Pit craters are now recognised as being an important part of the surface morphology and structure of many planetary bodies, and are particularly remarkable on Mars. They are thought to arise from the drainage or collapse of a relatively weak surficial material into an open (or widening) void in a much stronger material below. These craters have a very distinctive expression, often presenting funnel-, cone-, or bowl-shaped geometries. Analogue models of pit crater formation produce pits that typically have steep, nearly conical cross sections, but only show the surface expression of their initiation and evolution. Numerical modelling studies of pit crater formation are limited and have produced some interesting, but nonetheless puzzling, results. Presented here is a high-resolution, 2D discrete element model of weak cover (regolith) collapse into either a static or a widening underlying void. Frictional and frictional-cohesive discrete elements are used to represent a range of probable cover rheologies. Under Martian gravitational conditions, frictional-cohesive and frictional materials both produce cone- and bowl-shaped pit craters. For a given cover thickness, the specific crater shape depends on the amount of underlying void space created for drainage.
    [Show full text]
  • Widespread Crater-Related Pitted Materials on Mars: Further Evidence for the Role of Target Volatiles During the Impact Process ⇑ Livio L
    Icarus 220 (2012) 348–368 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Widespread crater-related pitted materials on Mars: Further evidence for the role of target volatiles during the impact process ⇑ Livio L. Tornabene a, , Gordon R. Osinski a, Alfred S. McEwen b, Joseph M. Boyce c, Veronica J. Bray b, Christy M. Caudill b, John A. Grant d, Christopher W. Hamilton e, Sarah Mattson b, Peter J. Mouginis-Mark c a University of Western Ontario, Centre for Planetary Science and Exploration, Earth Sciences, London, ON, Canada N6A 5B7 b University of Arizona, Lunar and Planetary Lab, Tucson, AZ 85721-0092, USA c University of Hawai’i, Hawai’i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, Ma¯noa, HI 96822, USA d Smithsonian Institution, Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA e NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA article info abstract Article history: Recently acquired high-resolution images of martian impact craters provide further evidence for the Received 28 August 2011 interaction between subsurface volatiles and the impact cratering process. A densely pitted crater-related Revised 29 April 2012 unit has been identified in images of 204 craters from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. This sample of Accepted 9 May 2012 craters are nearly equally distributed between the two hemispheres, spanning from 53°Sto62°N latitude. Available online 24 May 2012 They range in diameter from 1 to 150 km, and are found at elevations between À5.5 to +5.2 km relative to the martian datum. The pits are polygonal to quasi-circular depressions that often occur in dense clus- Keywords: ters and range in size from 10 m to as large as 3 km.
    [Show full text]
  • “Mining” Water Ice on Mars an Assessment of ISRU Options in Support of Future Human Missions
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration “Mining” Water Ice on Mars An Assessment of ISRU Options in Support of Future Human Missions Stephen Hoffman, Alida Andrews, Kevin Watts July 2016 Agenda • Introduction • What kind of water ice are we talking about • Options for accessing the water ice • Drilling Options • “Mining” Options • EMC scenario and requirements • Recommendations and future work Acknowledgement • The authors of this report learned much during the process of researching the technologies and operations associated with drilling into icy deposits and extract water from those deposits. We would like to acknowledge the support and advice provided by the following individuals and their organizations: – Brian Glass, PhD, NASA Ames Research Center – Robert Haehnel, PhD, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory – Patrick Haggerty, National Science Foundation/Geosciences/Polar Programs – Jennifer Mercer, PhD, National Science Foundation/Geosciences/Polar Programs – Frank Rack, PhD, University of Nebraska-Lincoln – Jason Weale, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Mining Water Ice on Mars INTRODUCTION Background • Addendum to M-WIP study, addressing one of the areas not fully covered in this report: accessing and mining water ice if it is present in certain glacier-like forms – The M-WIP report is available at http://mepag.nasa.gov/reports.cfm • The First Landing Site/Exploration Zone Workshop for Human Missions to Mars (October 2015) set the target
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Properties of Martian Meteorites: Porosity and Density Measurements
    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 42, Nr 12, 2043–2054 (2007) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Physical properties of Martian meteorites: Porosity and density measurements Ian M. COULSON1, 2*, Martin BEECH3, and Wenshuang NIE3 1Solid Earth Studies Laboratory (SESL), Department of Geology, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 0A2, Canada 2Institut für Geowissenschaften, Universität Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany 3Campion College, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 0A2, Canada *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 11 September 2006; revision accepted 06 June 2007) Abstract–Martian meteorites are fragments of the Martian crust. These samples represent igneous rocks, much like basalt. As such, many laboratory techniques designed for the study of Earth materials have been applied to these meteorites. Despite numerous studies of Martian meteorites, little data exists on their basic structural characteristics, such as porosity or density, information that is important in interpreting their origin, shock modification, and cosmic ray exposure history. Analysis of these meteorites provides both insight into the various lithologies present as well as the impact history of the planet’s surface. We present new data relating to the physical characteristics of twelve Martian meteorites. Porosity was determined via a combination of scanning electron microscope (SEM) imagery/image analysis and helium pycnometry, coupled with a modified Archimedean method for bulk density measurements. Our results show a range in porosity and density values and that porosity tends to increase toward the edge of the sample. Preliminary interpretation of the data demonstrates good agreement between porosity measured at 100× and 300× magnification for the shergottite group, while others exhibit more variability.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Craters on Earth and in the Solar System Christian KOEBERL
    Impact Craters on Earth and in the Solar System Christian KOEBERL Natural History Museum & University of Vienna, Austria • The importance of impact cratering on terrestrial planets is obvious from the abundance of craters on their surfaces Studying Impact Craters on Earth: • Only source for ground/truthing impact processes in the solar system • Connection with early Earth processes – importance for origin and evolution of life • Importance for, and connection with, mass extinction events • Exposure of deep crust at central uplifts of large impact structures Mercury Mariner 10 (1974) Messenger (2008) Venus – 30 km crater A comparison of ~30-km diameter impact craters on several planetary bodies. All craters are shown at the same scale and have been rotated so that the light source is from the left. This rotation puts north at the bottom of the images of the lunar crater and the Ganymede crater. Names and locations of the four craters are as follows: Golubkhina (Venus), 60.30N, 286.40E; Kepler (Moon), 8.10N, 38.10W; (Mars), 20.80S, 53.60E; (Ganymede), 29.80S, 136.00W. Mars Small simple crater on Mars Mars – crater in stream New impact craters observed on Mars new impact crater south of Echus Chasma, Mars (2011 image; not in 2009 image) Ice in Pair of Fresh Craters on Mars Fades with Time This series of HiRISE images (75 m wide) spanning a period of 15 weeks shows a pair of fresh, middle-latitude craters on Mars in which ice apparent in the earliest images disappears by the later ones. The two craters are each about 4 m in diameter and half a meter deep.
    [Show full text]