DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Statement Jackdaw Field Development Environmental Statement D/4260/2021 [THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK] JACKDAW FIELD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT STANDARD INFORMATION SHEET STANDARD INFORMATION SHEET Project Name Jackdaw Field Development Block and Licence Nos Blocks 30/02a, 30/03a DEEP, and 30/02d OPRED Reference No D/4260/2021 Type of Project Development of the Jackdaw ultra-high pressure / high temperature (uHPHT) gas condensate field via a new wellhead platform (WHP) tied-back to the existing Shearwater host platform. Undertaker BG International Limited (an affiliate of Shell UK Limited) Shell U.K. Limited, 1 Altens Farm Road, Nigg, Aberdeen, AB12 3FY Licensees/ Owners Co-venturers % Holding BG International Limited 74 ONE-Dyas E&P Limited 26 Short Description The Jackdaw field is an uHPHT reservoir that will be developed with a not permanently attended WHP. Four wells will be drilled at the Jackdaw WHP. Produced fluids will be exported via a subsea pipeline to the Shearwater platform where these will be processed before onward export via the Fulmar Gas Line and the Forties Pipeline System. The proposed development may be summarised as follows: ◼ Installation of a new WHP; ◼ Drilling of four production wells; ◼ Installation of a new approximately 31 km pipeline from the Jackdaw WHP to the Shearwater platform; ◼ Processing and export of the Jackdaw hydrocarbons via the Shearwater host platform; and ◼ First production expected between Q3 - Q4 2024. Key Dates Activities Date Drilling of wells Q3 2022 - Q4 2023 Installation of platform jacket Q3 2022 Installation of topsides and export pipeline Q3 2022 - Q1 2024 First production Q3/Q4 2024 Significant No significant environmental or socio-economic impacts identified after Environmental Effects implementation of mitigation measures. Identified Statement Prepared By Shell U.K. Limited and Genesis Oil and Gas Consultants Ltd. Company Job Title Relevant Qualifications/ Experience Shell U.K. Limited Environmental Team Lead - > 20 years’ working in environment/oil and gas Projects Jackdaw Project 19 years’ working in environment/oil and gas Environmental Advisor Genesis Oil and Gas Senior Consultant > 20 years’ working in environment/oil and gas Consultants Environmental Engineer Consultant Environmental 12 years’ working in environment/oil and gas Engineer i JACKDAW FIELD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT STANDARD INFORMATION SHEET [THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK] ii JACKDAW FIELD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS Standard Information Sheet…………………………………………..……………………..... i Non-Technical Summary………………………………………………………………………. vi Acronyms………………………………………………………………………………………..... xxiii 1 Introduction………………………………………………...……………………………………. 1-1 1.1 Project Overview and Purpose………………………………………………………............. 1-1 1.2 Project Scope……………………………………………………………………………………. 1-2 1.3 Scope of the Environmental Statement……………………….……………………………. 1-3 1.4 Legislative Overview……………………………………………………………………………. 1-3 1.5 Shell UK Environmental Management System………….………………………………….. 1-6 1.6 Environmentally Critical Elements……………………………………………………………. 1-9 1.7 Consultation……………………………………………………………………………………… 1-9 1.8 Additional Studies……………………………………………………………………………….. 1-9 2 Project Description……………………………………………………………………...………. 2-1 2.1 Development Overview……………………………………………………………………….. 2-1 2.2 Schedule………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2-2 2.3 Field and Reservoir Characteristics………………………………………………………….. 2-2 2.4 Production Profiles………………………………………………………………………………. 2-4 2.5 Analysis of Alternatives…………………………………………………………………………. 2-8 2.6 Wells and Drilling………………………………………………………………………………… 2-20 2.7 Jackdaw Wellhead Platform………………………………………...……………………..… 2-27 2.8 Pipelines and Subsea Infrastructure…………………………………………………………. 2-37 2.9 Jackdaw Fluids Processing and Export at Shearwater…………..……………………… 2-42 2.10 Support Vessels………………………………………………………………………………..… 2-47 2.11 Project Uncertainties……………………………………………………………………...……. 2-48 2.12 Possible Future Expansion or Modification………………………………………………..… 2-48 2.13 Decommissioning……………………………………………………………………………..… 2-48 3 Baseline Environment…………………………………………………………………………... 3-1 3.1 Introduction…………………………………...…………………………………………………. 3-1 3.2 Environmental Baseline Surveys………………………………………………………………. 3-1 3.3 Physical Environment…………………………………………………………………………… 3-4 3.4 Biological Environment………………………………………………………………………… 3-24 3.5 Conservation…………………………………………………………………………………….. 3-45 3.6 Socio-economic Environment…………………………………………………………….….. 3-50 4 Impact Assessment Methodology…………………………………………………………… 4-1 iii JACKDAW FIELD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………..…….. 4-1 4.2 Impact Identification and Aspects………………………………………………….………. 4-1 4.3 Assessment of Impact Significance…………………………………………………….…… 4-4 4.4 Impact Mitigation……………………………………………………………………………..… 4-8 5 Physical Presence……………………………………………………………………………..… 5-1 5.1 Sources and Nature of Project Impact……………………………………………………… 5-1 5.2 Sensitivity of Receptors……………………………………………………….………………… 5-1 5.3 Physical Presence Impact Assessment………………………………………………..…….. 5-2 5.4 Management and Mitigation Measures……………………………………….…………… 5-7 6 Seabed Disturbance…………………………………………………………………...………. 6-1 6.1 Sources and Nature of Project Impact……………………………………………………… 6-1 6.2 Sensitivity of Receptors…………………………………………………………………………. 6-10 6.3 Seabed Disturbance Impact Assessment………………………………………………….. 6-12 6.4 Cumulative and Transboundary Effects………………………………………………..…… 6-16 6.5 Management and Mitigation Measures……………………………………………….…… 6-17 7 Emissions to Air……………………………………………………………..…………………….. 7-1 7.1 Source and Nature of Project Impact……………………………..………..……………… 7-1 7.2 Sensitivity of Receptors……………………………………………………………………..….. 7-5 7.3 Quantification of Emissions Associated with the Jackdaw Project………..…………... 7-6 7.4 Emissions to Air Impact Assessment…………………………………………………..……… 7-21 7.5 Management and Mitigation Measures…………………….……………………………… 7-26 8 Discharges to Sea………………………………………………………..……………………… 8-1 8.1 Sources and Nature of Project Impact……………………………………..………………. 8-1 8.2 Sensitivity of Receptors……………………………………………………………………….... 8-8 8.3 Discharges to Sea Impact Assessment……………………………………………..………. 8-10 8.4 Management and Mitigation Measures.…………………………………………………… 8-18 9 Underwater Noise……………………………………………………………………………….. 9-1 9.1 Introduction……………………………………………...………………………………………. 9-1 9.2 Source and Nature of Project Impact……………..……………………..………………… 9-1 9.3 Sensitivity of Receptors………………………………………………………………..……….. 9-3 9.4 Underwater Noise Impact Assessment……………………………………………………… 9-5 9.5 Management and Mitigation Measures……………………………………………………. 9-14 10 Waste Generation and Management……………………………………………..………. 10-1 10.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..………….. 10-1 10.2 Waste Generation……………………………………………………………………...………. 10-1 10.3 Waste Disposal Onshore…………………………………………………………………..…… 10-6 iv JACKDAW FIELD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS 10.4 Management of Waste…………………………...…………………………………………… 10-8 10.5 Management and Mitigation Measures……………………………………………………. 10-10 11 Accidental Events…………………………………………………………………………..…... 11-1 11.1 Sources of Accidental Releases……………………………………………………………… 11-1 11.2 Spill Modelling...........................…………………………….……………………………..…… 11-2 11.3 Impact Assessment...................……………………………………………………..………… 11-14 11.4 Major Environmental Incident Assessment……………..……………………..…………... 11-30 11.5 Susceptibility to Natural Disasters ……………………………………………………………. 11-33 11.5 Management and Mitigation Measures……………………………………………….…… 11-33 11.6 Conclusions……………………………………………………………………………………….. 11-34 12 Environmental, Social and Health Management Plan…….………………………….…. 12-1 12.1 Commitments Register…………………………………………………................................. 12-1 12.2 Monitoring……………………………………………………………………………...………… 12-1 13 Conclusions………………………………………………………………………………………. 13-1 13.1 Environmental Impact Assessment: Requirements and Purpose………………….…… 13-1 13.2 Environmental Effects………………………………………………………………………..…. 13-1 13.3 Overall Conclusion…………………………………...…………………………………..…….. 13-2 14 References…………………………………………………………………………………..…… 14-1 A Scotland’s National Marine Plan…………………………………………………………..…. A-1 A.1 Scotland’s National Marine Plan…………………………………….……………………..… A-1 A.2 Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)……………………….……………..……… A-5 A.3 Oil and Gas Marine Planning Policies……………………………………………………..… A-7 B Consultation Register…………………………………………………………………………… B-1 C Jackdaw Production Profiles………………………………………………………………….. C-1 C.1 The Jackdaw Field Development Plan Production Forecast……………...……………. C-1 D Aspects and Impacts Register, and Scoping Matrix……………………………………… D-1 v JACKDAW FIELD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY BACKGROUND The Jackdaw field is an ultra high pressure high temperature (uHPHT) gas condensate field. It lies in blocks 30/02a, 30/02d and 30/03a DEEP1 of the United Kingdom Continental Shelf (UKCS) in a water depth of approximately 78 m (Figure 1). The field is located in the central North Sea (CNS), approximately 250 km east of Aberdeen, 30 km south-east of the Shearwater platform and adjacent to the UK/Norway median line as shown in Figure 1 below. Figure 1 Location of the Jackdaw Project. BG International Limited, an affiliate of Shell U.K. Limited (referred to throughout this report as ''Shell'' on behalf of itself and its co-venturer ONE-Dyas E&P Limited) proposes to develop the Jackdaw field using a not permanently attended wellhead platform (WHP) tied back via a 31 km subsea pipeline to the Shearwater
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Speaker Bios
    Safety30 Speaker Bios Matt Abraham HSE Director, Oil & Gas UK No bio Rebecca Allison Asset Integrity Solutions Centre Manager, The Oil & Gas Technology Centre Rebecca is a highly driven and motivated Senior Manager with more than 20 years of experience in the oil and gas sector working for various service companies such as Lloyd’s Register, Aker Solutions and Stork. As manager of the Asset Integrity Solution Centre within the Oil & Gas Technology Centre, Rebecca is responsible for leading the Asset Integrity team to identify and appraise the relevance, readiness and accessibility of existing technology in the market place to meet mature basin asset integrity challenges. She is specifically charged with identifying specific technology gaps that remain in asset integrity through designing and delivering programmes to resolve these gaps. Mario Alonso Digital Solutions Product Leader - Subsea Production Systems & Service, Baker Hughes, a GE Company Mario is a digital solutions product leader at Baker Hugues, a GE Business. He is responsible for the digital solutions portfolio within Subsea Production Systems and Services, and has been focused on development of digital analytics applications for the last 13+ years. Mario has an engineering background and hold a PhD in Multi-Phase Fluid Dynamics. He is a chartered engineer and member of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Zev Arnold Executive, Accenture Zev is an executive in Accenture's Industry X.0 Practice and a real-time applications practitioner. In his career, he has helped his clients make improvements in operational performance and integrity, and helped secure their license to operate. He has specialized in real-time infrastructure and analytics, working with the Integrated Operations initiatives of several multinational oil and gas operating companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospective Decommissioning Activity and Infrastructure Availability in the UKCS
    NORTH SEA STUDY OCCASIONAL PAPER No. 122 Prospective Decommissioning Activity and Infrastructure Availability in the UKCS Professor Alexander G. Kemp and Linda Stephen October, 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS ISSN 0143-022X NORTH SEA ECONOMICS Research in North Sea Economics has been conducted in the Economics Department since 1973. The present and likely future effects of oil and gas developments on the Scottish economy formed the subject of a long term study undertaken for the Scottish Office. The final report of this study, The Economic Impact of North Sea Oil on Scotland, was published by HMSO in 1978. In more recent years further work has been done on the impact of oil on local economies and on the barriers to entry and characteristics of the supply companies in the offshore oil industry. The second and longer lasting theme of research has been an analysis of licensing and fiscal regimes applied to petroleum exploitation. Work in this field was initially financed by a major firm of accountants, by British Petroleum, and subsequently by the Shell Grants Committee. Much of this work has involved analysis of fiscal systems in other oil producing countries including Australia, Canada, the United States, Indonesia, Egypt, Nigeria and Malaysia. Because of the continuing interest in the UK fiscal system many papers have been produced on the effects of this regime. From 1985 to 1987 the Economic and Social Science Research Council financed research on the relationship between oil companies and Governments in the UK, Norway, Denmark and The Netherlands. A main part of this work involved the construction of Monte Carlo simulation models which have been employed to measure the extents to which fiscal systems share in exploration and development risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Centrica Energy, Exploration and Production Asset Book 2014
    Exploration and Production Asset Book 2014 Contents Introduction 3 Our story so far 5 Our business outlook 7 Regional overview 9 UK & the Netherlands 11 Norway 25 Canada 33 Trinidad and Tobago 41 Glossary 46 Centrica Energy Asset book 2014 Introduction Centrica Energy Asset book 2014 Introduction 3 4 Our E&P story started in the East Irish Sea with the discovery of the Morecambe Bay gas field in 1974 by John Bains. As Centrica Energy’s sole asset at the time of the company’s birth in 1997, the Morecambe operation was the springboard for our growth into what is Safety now an E&P business producing 230mboe/d across five countries on both sides of the Atlantic. Over 1,700 of my colleagues work every day with the united purpose to make our business aspirations a reality, delivering energy not just for today but well into the future. We are united by a common desire to create a culture across Centrica Energy (CE) which can be summed up in five words; safety, high performance and pioneering High performance spirit. We call this the CE Way and it guides everything we do, ensuring that we do our jobs safely, or not at all, we demand the best from one another and we look for better ways to achieve our goals. The E&P world is one where you can ill afford to stand still if you want to maintain production, never mind grow it. We are working in a challenging environment where, across the globe, industry players see increasing costs from the supply chain, lower productivity in maturing basins Pioneering spirit and less than adequate capital project performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System
    Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process This document has been issued by the Department of Energy and Climate Change, together with the Devolved Administrations for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. April 2012 UK’s National Implementation Measures submission – April 2012 Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process On 12 December 2011, the UK submitted to the European Commission the UK’s National Implementation Measures (NIMs), containing the preliminary levels of free allocation of allowances to installations under Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System (2013-2020), in accordance with Article 11 of the revised ETS Directive (2009/29/EC). In response to queries raised by the European Commission during the first stage of their assessment of the UK’s NIMs, the UK has made a small number of modifications to its NIMs. This includes the introduction of preliminary levels of free allocation for four additional installations and amendments to the preliminary free allocation levels of seven installations that were included in the original NIMs submission. The operators of the installations affected have been informed directly of these changes. The allocations are not final at this stage as the Commission’s NIMs scrutiny process is ongoing. Only when all installation-level allocations for an EU Member State have been approved will that Member State’s NIMs and the preliminary levels of allocation be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENTN=== of ENERGY Nova Scotia EXPORT MARKET ANALYSIS
    NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENTN=== OF ENERGY Nova Scotia EXPORT MARKET ANALYSIS MARCH 2017 Contents Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Best Prospects Charts…….………………………………………………………………………………….…...……………………………………..6 Angola Country Profile .................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Australia Country Profile ................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Brazil Country Profile ....................................................................................................................................................................... 30 Canada Country Profile ................................................................................................................................................................... 39 China Country Profile ....................................................................................................................................................................... 57 Denmark Country Profile ................................................................................................................................................................ 67 Kazakhstan Country Profile ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ý ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 or ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number: 001-38260 BP Midstream Partners LP (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 82-1646447 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 501 Westlake Park Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77079 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (281) 366-2000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Units, Representing Limited Partner Interests New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No ¨ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No ý Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2017 ® Technologies
    EXPLORATION | DRILLING | PRODUCTION NOVEMBER 2017 ® TECHNOLOGIES OF CITRUS OIL FROM ORANGE PEELS TO IMPROVE WELL PERFORMANCE & PRODUCTIVITY. Deploying d-Limonene, an industry-proven bio-based solvent extracted from oranges, and various surfactant platforms, we develop prescriptive chemistry solutions unique to every reservoir, fi eld and well. This transformative portfolio of chemistries consistently increases a client’s estimated ultimate recovery (EUR), leveraging the power of nature. We Are Committed to Helping Our Clients Throughout the Entire Fluid Lifecycle. FLOTEKIND.COM y y FLOTEKIND 10 32 November 2017 Conntentstents Volume 10 Issue 11 03 Comment 28 Time for a fresh approach Giles Edward, M-Flow, UK, explains how new innovation and fresh thinking in multiphase metering will enable a shift in focus; moving 05 World news from meters and onto the power and impact of accurate, reliable and qualitative data. 10 Sustainable self-suffi ciency 32 Forging ahead with fl ow assurance Igor Yusufov, Corporation Energy, Russia, provides a detailed Lars Anders Ruden & Svein Eirik Monge, Emerson Automation overview of the Russian upstream sector and shows how, despite Solutions, show how technology advances are securing increased challenges, it remains a self-sufficient hub of sustainable growth. flow assurance in offshore and onshore fields. 14 Making the most of the Middle East 35 Synergy of efforts Sang Y. Lee, PhD, and Donald J. Broton, CTL Group, demonstrate how Dominique Guérillot and Alexander Darishchev, Texas A&M University clinker microscopy, combined with other laboratory testing, such as at Qatar, present a joint industry funded project aimed at evaluating X-ray diffraction (XRD), can be used as a quality control tool for oilwell carbonate reservoir engineering workflows with oil and gas cement production.
    [Show full text]
  • SPE Review London, January 2018
    Issue 27 \ January 2018 LONDON • FPS Pipeline System: a brief history • Are Oil Producers Misguided? PLUS: events, jobs and more NEWS Contents Information ADMINISTRATIVE Welcome to 2018! At SPE Review London, we strive to provide knowledge and Behind the Scenes ...3 information to navigate our changing, and challenging, industry. We trust the January 2018 issue of SPE Review London will be SPE London: Meet the Board ...9 useful, actionable and informative. In the first of two technical features in this issue, ‘FPS Pipeline System: a brief historical overview’, Jonathan Ovens, Senior TECHNICAL FEATURES Reservoir Engineer at JX Nippon E&P (UK) Ltd., provides (page 4) a FPS Pipeline System: a brief timely overview of this key piece of North Sea infrastructure. historical overview ...4 The second of this issue’s technical features starts on page 6, and Oil and gas production from the North Sea poses the question: Are Oil Producers Misguided? Based on a wide- relies on existing infrastructure that, overall, ranging lecture given in January at SPE London by Iskander Diyashev, is highly reliable but rarely mentioned. it discusses the potential future of the oil industry, electric cars, How much do you know about it? nuclear and solar energy. Are Oil Producers Misguided? ...6 Our regular features include: Meet the people ‘behind the scenes’: Are there lessons to be learned as we The SPE Review Editorial Board (page 3), the SPE London Board transition into a new era where the (page 9), and make sure to keep up to date with industry events fundamental value of energy will be and networking opportunities,and the Job Board, all on Page 11.
    [Show full text]
  • BP P.L.C. Group Results Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2018 Highlights Year on Year($ Billion)
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE London 5 February 2019 BP p.l.c. Group results Fourth quarter and full year 2018 Highlights Building business momentum, growing earnings and returns • More than double full-year earnings, near double returns – Underlying replacement cost profit for full year 2018 was $12.7 billion, more than double that reported for 2017. The fourth quarter result was $3.5 billion, driven by the strong operating performance across all business segments. – Return on average capital employed was 11.2% compared to 5.8% in 2017. – Operating cash flow, excluding Gulf of Mexico oil spill payments, for full year 2018 was $26.1 billion, including a $2.6 billion working capital build (after adjusting for inventory holding losses). This compares with $24.1 billion for 2017, which included a working capital release of $2.6 billion. – Gulf of Mexico oil spill payments in 2018 totalled $3.2 billion on a post-tax basis. – Total divestments and other proceeds in 2018 were $3.5 billion. BP intends to complete more than $10 billion divestments over the next two years, which includes plans announced following the BHP transaction. – Dividend of 10.25 cents a share announced for the fourth quarter, 2.5% higher than a year earlier. • Record Upstream reliability, record refining throughput – Operational reliability was very strong in 2018 for both main business segments. – For the year, BP-operated Upstream plant reliability was a record 96%, and Downstream delivered refining availability of 95% and record refining throughput. – Reported oil and gas production averaged 3.7 million barrels of oil equivalent a day for 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2011 2 Subsea Uk News November 2011 3 Subsea Uk News November 2011 Subsea Uk News Subsea Uk News
    SUBSEA UK NEWS THE MAGAZINE FROM SUBSEA UK WWW.SUBSEAUK.COM NOVEMBER 2011 2 SUBSEA UK NEWS NOVEMBER 2011 3 SUBSEA UK NEWS NOVEMBER 2011 SUBSEA UK NEWS SUBSEA UK NEWS Tel: +44 (0)845 505 3535 As we near the end of 2011, we see the subsea E-mail: [email protected] industry continue to perform as a global leader and www.subseauk.com outperform other industries in the UK as a major growth sector. Following on from a very successful Offshore Europe event, we heard of some major NEW Members project commitments in the UK sector ensuring we have a strong, long term domestic market. On the other hand, overseas interest in our technology and Sep - 11 skills continues to grow with many regions of the • Abercus world looking to the UK as an example to follow. The UK subsea industry is valued at £6 billion and more • Apollo Offshore Engineering Ltd. than half is attributed to exports, which makes the sector an important contributor to the economy. • Astrimar Ltd. The challenge for the future is to maintain the UK’s position as global leader in subsea and ensure we have the correct mix of technology and • Bowtech Products Limited innovation to meet the challenges in our working environment. There are huge opportunities for us globally as well as here in the UK and we must continue to promote our industry to gain the recognition it deserves to ensure we have Oct - 11 support going forward. I do believe we have a great story to tell and if we get our story across to a wider audience we will certainly increase the awareness • Hiretech Ltd of long term opportunities in a high tech industry.
    [Show full text]
  • 1:13-Cv-07089-UA
    Case 1:13-cv-07089-ALC-SN Document 1 Filed 10/04/13 Page 1 of 85 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KEVIN McDONNELL, ANTHONY INSINGA, ROBERT MICHIELS and JOHN DEVIVO, on behalf of themselves and all Case No.: ___________________ others similarly situated, ECF Case Plaintiffs, CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC, BP PLC, STATOIL ASA, MORGAN STANLEY, TRAFIGURA BEHEER B.V., TRAFIGURA AG, PHIBRO TRADING LLC, VITOL, S.A. and JOHN DOES 1-50, Defendants. Based upon investigation of counsel from publicly available information including information about prices, the North Sea Brent Crude Oil market, the European Commission (―EC‖) and other investigations relating to violations of the Platts Market-On-Close price assessment process, reports published by and on behalf of the International Energy Agency, the International Energy Forum, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (―IOSCO‖), Plaintiffs allege, upon knowledge as to themselves and their own acts, and upon information and belief as to all other matters, as follows: I. NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This action arises from a manipulation of North Sea Brent Crude Oil (as defined herein) and related markets by Defendants Royal Dutch Shell plc (―Shell‖), BP plc (―BP‖), Statoil ASA (―Statoil‖), Morgan Stanley, Trafigura Beheer B.V., Trafigura AG, Phibro Trading LLC (―Phibro‖), Vitol, S.A. (―Vitol‖) and others during the period of at least 2002 through the present (the ―Class Period‖). Case 1:13-cv-07089-ALC-SN Document 1 Filed 10/04/13 Page 2 of 85 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The United Kingdom 2002 Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY
    INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Energy Policies of IEA Countries The United Kingdom 2002 Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Energy Policies of IEA Countries The United Kingdom 2002 Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR 9, rue de la Fédération, ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION 75739 Paris, cedex 15, France AND DEVELOPMENT The International Energy Agency (IEA) is an Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris autonomous body which was established in November on 14th December 1960, and which came into force 1974 within the framework of the Organisation for on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall implement an international energy programme. promote policies designed: It carries out a comprehensive programme of energy co- • to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth operation among twenty-six* of the OECD’s thirty and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries. The basic aims of the IEA are: Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development • to maintain and improve systems for coping with oil of the world economy; supply disruptions; • to contribute to sound economic expansion in • to promote rational energy policies in a global Member as well as non-member countries in the context through co-operative relations with non- process of economic development; and member countries, industry and international organisations; • to contribute to the expansion
    [Show full text]