DOCSLIB.ORG

The Communicative Aspects of Trade Marks : a Legal, Functional and Economic Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Communicative Aspects of Trade Marks : a Legal, Functional and Economic Analysis The communicative aspects of trade marks : a legal, functional and economic analysis. Maniatis, Spyros M The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/1659 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] THE COMMUNICATIVE ASPECTS OF TRADE MARKS: A LEGAL, FUNCTIONAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS by SPYROS M. MANIATIS A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Intellectual Property Law Unit Centre for Commercial Law Studies Queen Mary and Westfield College University of London July 1998 Table of Contents Page Acknowledgments .9 Abstract .10 CHAPTER I Introduction .................................................................................................................. 11 1.1. Defining trade marks as communicators and assets.............................................11 1.2. Some trade mark problems...................................................................................12 1.3. The scope and objectives of this thesis ................................................................13 1.4. The tools for evaluating the hypothesis................................................................13 1.5. An outline of the parts..........................................................................................14 CHAPTER II ASynopsis of Trade Mark History.............................................................................16 2.1. Introduction..........................................................................................................16 2.2. Antiquity.............................................................................................................18 2.2.1. The Greeks and the Romans ..........................................................................20 2.2.2. Legal provisions in antiquity .........................................................................22 2.3. The middle ages ..................................................................................................23 2.3.1. Appellations of origin.................................................................................... 25 2.3.2. Marks of craftsmen and artists.......................................................................26 2.3.3. Trade marks and guilds..................................................................................28 2 2.3.4. Legal provisions during the Middle Ages......................................................30 2.4. The modern times.................................................................................................31 2.4.1. United Kingdom.............................................................................................31 2.4.2. United States..................................................................................................34 2.4.3. France.............................................................................................................37 2.5. Conclusion............................................................................................................38 CHAPTER III TradeMarks and the Concept of Property................................................................39 3.1. Preface..................................................................................................................39 3.2. Introduction..........................................................................................................41 3.3. The justification based on labour.........................................................................54 3.3.1. Locke's property theory and the leap to private property..............................54 3.3.2. Two qualifications: "No Waste" and the "Enough" and "as Good" condition.................................................................................................62 3.3.3. The Lockeian labour......................................................................................64 3.3.4. Trade marks as Lockeian "labour".................................................................68 3.3.5. The "Commons" for trade marks...................................................................72 3.3.6. The "Commons" after the appropriation and the two conditions ..................76 3.3.7. Concluding remarks.......................................................................................81 3.4. The justification based on personality..................................................................81 3.4.1. Hegel's Property Theory................................................................................81 3.4.2. Some qualifications on Property....................................................................87 3.4.3. Some Hegelian ways of exercising property rights .......................................90 3.4.4. A clearer view of "Intellectual Property".......................................................92 3.4.5. A more complicated view of trade marks...................................................... 95 3.4.6. The role of the consumer and some concluding remarks...............................99 3.5. Some comments on the justification of property ...............................................100 3 CHAPTER IV TheFunctions of Trade Marks..................................................................................107 4.1. Introduction........................................................................................................107 4.1 .1. Defining the consumer.................................................................................107 4.1.2. An example of a world without trade marks................................................109 4.1.3. Trade marks as conveyors of information....................................................109 4.2. Trade marks: communicators and indicators of origin.......................................112 4.2.1. Codes of communication.............................................................................112 4.2.2. Use of a mark as proof of ownership...........................................................115 4.2.3. Consumption and consumerism...................................................................116 4.2.4. Trade marks as code of communication ......................................................120 4.2.5. Trade marks as indicators of origin..............................................................122 4.2.6. Why concrete origin is important.................................................................124 4.3. Trade marks: indicators of quality .....................................................................131 4.3.1. Product differentiation.................................................................................131 4.3.2. Consumer motivation...................................................................................134 4.3.3. Abstract origin and brand loyalty.................................................................141 4.3.4. Trade marks as guarantees of quality...........................................................146 4.4. Trade marks: advertising symbols......................................................................153 4.4.1. Trade marks and advertising........................................................................153 4.4.2. Communication and the symbolic value of branded goods.........................158 4.4.3. Advertising, information, persuasion and trade marks ................................167 4.5. The expansion of trade marks ............................................................................169 4.5.1. Trade marks and other rights .......................................................................169 4.5.2. Trade marks as assets...................................................................................174 4.6. Conclusion - A perfect trade mark tale ..............................................................178 4 CHAPTER V Competitionand the Economics of Trade Marks....................................................180 5.1. Preface................................................................................................................180 5.2. Introduction........................................................................................................181 5.3. Laying the ground for trade marks and competition..........................................182 5.3.1. The game players.........................................................................................182 5.3.2. The market interaction.................................................................................183 5.3.3. The basics of market rational behaviour......................................................185 5.4. The relation of basics with trade marks..............................................................186 5.4.1. Trade marks and the organisation of the markets ........................................186 5.4.2. The economics of information.....................................................................187 5.4.3. Trade marks and the orthodoxy of competition...........................................192 5.4.4. An inherent weakness of economics............................................................193
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Official Journal C 244 of the European Union
    Official Journal C 244 of the European Union Volume 59 English edition Information and Notices 5 July 2016 Contents II Information INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES European Commission 2016/C 244/01 Communication from the Commission amending the Annex to the Communication to the Member States on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to short-term export-credit insurance ............................................................................. 1 IV Notices NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES European Commission 2016/C 244/02 Euro exchange rates .............................................................................................................. 3 2016/C 244/03 Commission notice on the customs enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights concerning goods brought into the customs territory of the Union without being released for free circulation including goods in transit .................................................................................................................... 4 2016/C 244/04 Commission notice concerning the date of application of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro- Mediterranean preferential rules of origin or the protocols on rules of origin providing for diagonal cumulation between the Contracting Parties to this Convention .................................................... 10 EN NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES 2016/C 244/05 United Kingdom Government notice concerning
    [Show full text]
  • City Research Online
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: McDonagh, L. and Mimler, M. (2017). Intellectual Property Law and Brexit: A Retreat or a Reaffirmation of Jurisdiction? In: Dougan, M. (Ed.), The UK after Brexit. (pp. 159-179). Cambridge, UK: Intersentia. ISBN 1780684711 This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/17634/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] CHAPTER 8 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW AND BREXIT: A RETREAT OR A REAFFIRMATION OF JURISDICTION? Luke McDonagh and Marc Mimler* Intellectual Property Law and Brexit 1. INTRODUCTION The effect of European Union law on intellectual property (IP) law in the United Kingdom has been profound. There is no area of IP law that does not feature EU legislation or CJEU case law. In fact, it may be the most ‘Europeanised’ area of private law.1 For this reason, ‘Brexit’ will undoubtedly have a massive impact on the current IP framework in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sydney Law Review
    volume 41 number 1 march 2019 the sydney law review julius stone address 1 Inside and Outside Global Law – Hans Lindahl articles Litigants and Legal Representatives: A Study of Special Leave Applications in the High Court of Australia – Pam Stewart and Anita Stuhmcke 35 The Principle of Legality: Protecting Statutory Rights from Statutory Infringement? – Bruce Chen 73 An Empirical Investigation of 20 Years of Trade Mark Infringement Litigation in Australian Courts – Vicki T Huang 105 before the high court Comcare v Banerji: Public Servants and Political Communication – Kieran Pender 131 book review Markus D Dubber, The Dual Penal State: The Crisis of Criminal Law in Comparative-Historical Perspective – James Monaghan 149 EDITORIAL BOARD Elisa Arcioni (Editor) Celeste Black (Editor) Fady Aoun Tanya Mitchell Ben Chen Jacqui Mowbray Emily Hammond Joellen Riley Sheelagh McCracken Yane Svetiev STUDENT EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Callum Christodoulou Byron Howard Serena May Elisabeth Enright Laura Ismay Ajay Sivanathan George Farrugia Elsher Keir Vivienne Zhang Claudia Harper Charlotte Lewis Before the High Court Editor: Emily Hammond Publishing Manager: Cate Stewart Correspondence should be addressed to: Sydney Law Review Law Publishing Unit Sydney Law School Building F10, Eastern Avenue UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY NSW 2006 AUSTRALIA Email: [email protected] Website and submissions: <https://sydney.edu.au/law/our-research/ publications/sydney-law-review.html> For subscriptions outside North America: <http://sydney.edu.au/sup/> For subscriptions in North America, contact Gaunt: [email protected] The Sydney Law Review is a refereed journal. © 2019 Sydney Law Review and authors. ISSN 0082–0512 (PRINT) ISSN 1444–9528 (ONLINE) Julius Stone Address Inside and Outside Global Law Hans Lindahl† Abstract Protracted and bitter resistance by alter-globalisation and anti-globalisation movements around the world shows that the globalisation of law transpires as the globalisation of inclusion and exclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Coca Cola Was the Purchase of Parley Brands
    SWAMI VIVEKANAND UNIVERSITY A PROJECT REPORT ON MARKETING STRATGIES OF TOP BRANDS OF COLD DRINKS Submitted in partial fulfilment for the Award of degree of Master in Management Studies UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF SUBMITTED BY Prof.SHWETA RAJPUT HEMANT SONI CERTIFICATE Certified that the dissertation title MARKETING STRATEGIES OF TOP BRANDS OF COLD DRINKS IN SAGAR is a bonafide work done Mr. HEMANI SONI under my guidance in partial fulfilment of Master in Management Studies programme . The views expressed in this dissertation is only of that of the researcher and the need not be those of this institute. This project work has been corrected by me. PROJECT GUIDE SWETA RAJPUT DATE:: PLACE: STUDENT’S DECLARATION I hereby declare that the Project Report conducted on MARKETING STRATEGIES OF TOP BRANDS OF COLD DRINKS Under the guidance of Ms. SHWETA RAJPUT Submitted in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION TO SVN COLLAGE Is my original work and the same has not been submitted for the award of any other Degree/diploma/fellowship or other similar titles or prizes. Place: SAGAR HEMANT SONI Date: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT It is indeed a pleasure doing a project on “MARKETING STRATEGIES OF TOP BRANDS OF COLD DRINKS”. I am grateful to sir Parmesh goutam (hod) for providing me this opportunity. I owe my indebtedness to My Project Guide Ms. Shweta rajput, for her keen interest, encouragement and constructive support and under whose able guidance I have completed out my project. She not only helped me in my project but also gave me an overall exposure to other issues related to retailing and answered all my queries calmly and patiently.
    [Show full text]
  • Eucrim 1/2016
    eucrim 2016 /1 THE EUROPEAN CRIMINAL LAW ASSOCIATIONS‘ FORUM Focus: Procedural Rights and Cooperation – New Tendencies Dossier particulier: Droits procéduraux et coopération – nouvelles tendances Schwerpunktthema: Verfahrensgarantien und Zusammenarbeit – neue Tendenzen The Directive on the Presumption of Innocence and the Right to Be Present at Trial Steven Cras and Anže Erbežnik The Directive on the Presumption of Innocence. A Missed Opportunity for Legal Persons? Stijn Lamberigts Inaudito reo Proceedings, Defence Rights, and Harmonisation Goals in the EU Prof. Dr. Stefano Ruggeri Paving the Way for Improved Mutual Assistance in the Context of Customs Fraud Emilia Porebska Können die Regelungen über die Zusammenarbeit der EU-Mitgliedstaaten bei der Strafverfolgung kurzerhand aufgehoben werden? Ulrich Schulz Vollstreckungshilfe zwischen Deutschland und Taiwan auf neuer Grundlage Dr. Ralf Riegel and Dr. Franca Fülle 2016 / 1 ISSUE / ÉDITION / AUSGABE The Associations for European Criminal Law and the Protection of Financial Interests of the EU is a network of academics and practitioners. The aim of this cooperation is to develop a European criminal law which both respects civil liberties and at the same time protects European citizens and the European institutions effectively. Joint seminars, joint research projects and annual meetings of the associations’ presidents are organised to achieve this aim. Contents News* Articles European Union Procedural Rights and Cooperation – New Tendencies Foundations Procedural Criminal Law 25 The Directive on the Presumption of 2 Fundamental Rights 13 Procedural Safeguards Innocence and the Right to Be Present at 2 Area of Freedom, Security 13 Data Protection Trial. Genesis and Description of the New and Justice 15 Ne bis in idem EU-Measure 3 Schengen Steven Cras and Anže Erbežnik Cooperation 36 The Directive on the Presumption of In- Institutions 16 European Arrest Warrant nocence.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (GRUR)
    The German Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (GRUR) The Secretary General German Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (GRUR) Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 11 Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 11 . RheinAtrium . 50668 Köln . Germany RheinAtrium 50668 Köln Phone +49 (0) 221 650 65-151 Fax +49 (0) 221 650 65-205 Email [email protected] www.grur.org July 1, 2013 Full English Version Opinion of the German Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (Deutsche Vereinigung für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht e.V.) regarding the European Commission proposal for a recast of the Trade Mark Directive The German Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (GRUR) is a scientific non-profit as- sociation. Its statutory purpose is the academic advancement and development of industrial property, copyright and competition law at the German, European and international level. For fulfilling these tasks, GRUR provides assistance to the legislative bodies and to authorities competent for issues of intellectu- al property law, organises conferences, workshops and further education courses, provides financial aid to selected university chairs and research projects and also publishes four leading German professional IP law journals (GRUR, GRUR International, GRUR-RR and GRUR-Prax.) With over 5,250 members coming from 52 countries, the association offers an umbrella for a wide range of IP professionals: law- yers, patent attorneys, judges, academics, representatives of the specific public authorities and of the international organisations as well as enterprises dealing with issues of intellectual property. On 27 March 2013 the European Commission presented proposals for an amendment of Regulation 207/2009 on the Community trade mark (Regulation) and for a recast of Directive 2008/95/EC for the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (Directive).
    [Show full text]
  • The Right of Publicity in the United Kingdom
    Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review Volume 18 Number 3 Symposium: International Rights of Article 7 Publicity 3-1-1998 The Right of Publicity in the United Kingdom Hayley Stallard Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Hayley Stallard, The Right of Publicity in the United Kingdom, 18 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 565 (1998). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr/vol18/iss3/7 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE RIGHT OF PUBLICITY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM Hayley Stallard I. INTRODUCTION This Article discuses the limited scope of the right of publicity as it exists in the United Kingdom.' Unlike in the United States, the law of the United Kingdom ("U.K.") does not recognize a right of publicity or even a distinct right to protect a person's image or likeness from unauthorized use. Despite the common practice of merchandising and endorsement within the United Kingdom, there is no easy or straightforward way under U.K. law to protect a personality from unauthorized commercial exploitation. As in many other countries, however, a person can find a limited amount of protection from other bodies of U.K. law, including various intellectual property laws and personal and business torts.
    [Show full text]
  • Reports of Trade Mark Cases for CIPA Journal
    Reports of Trade Mark Cases for CIPA Journal December 2019 Trade mark decisions Decisions of the General Court (GC) and Court of Justice (CJ) Ref no. Application (and where applicable, earlier Comment mark) GC FITNESS Following the EUIPO's dismissal of an application for a declaration of invalidity T‑536/18 - dairy products, jellies, fruit, vegetables, protein preparations (29) under article 59(1)(a), European Food Nestlé SA v filed an appeal in which they submitted EUIPO; European - cereals; foodstuffs based on rice or new evidence before the BoA. The matter Food SA flour (30) was referred to the GC on the - non-alcoholic drinks (32) admissibility of this evidence before returning to the BoA. 10 October 2019 The BoA had held that the new evidence Reg 2017/1001 had to be taken into account and, therefore, found the registration to be Reported by: invalid on the basis that the mark was Robert Milligan descriptive of the goods. However, the GC found that the BoA was not required to take into account the new evidence but instead it should have exercised its discretion as to whether the evidence should be admissible and provide reasons explaining their decision. Therefore, the GC annulled the BoA's decision. Ref no. Application (and where applicable, earlier Comment mark) GC The GC upheld the BoA's decision that T-10/19 the mark was descriptive pursuant to article 7(1)(c). United States Seafoods LLC v The word and figurative elements of the EUIPO mark in combination were descriptive of the nature and geographical origin of the goods concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance by Committee: the Role of Committees in European Policy Making and Policy
    Governance by Committee: The Role of Committees in European Policy Making and Policy Research Paper 00/GHA Return to Introduction STATE OF THE ART REPORT CONTRACT NUMBER: HPSE-CT-1999-00019 PROJECT NUMBER: SERD-1999-00128 TITLE: GOVERNANCE BY COMMITTEE, THE ROLE OF COMMITTEES IN EUROPEAN POLICY-MAKING AND POLICY IMPLEMENTATION MAASTRICHT, MAY 2000 Table of Contents 1. General Introduction ................................................................................................................ 4 Subproject 1: The Standing Committees in the European Parliament 2.1..................Introduction ............................................................................................................... 6 2.2..................The Evolution of the European Parliament: From Consultative ............................... 6 Assembly to Co-legislator 2.2.1...............The EP as a Legislative Actor after Maastricht......................................................... 7 2.2.2...............EP and Council on an Even Footing after Amsterdam.............................................. 8 2.2.2.1. ..........The Streamlining of the Co-decision Procedure........................................................ 9 2.3..................The Role of EP Committees in the Legislative Process ............................................ 10 2.3.1...............Membership in EP Committees.................................................................................12 2.3.2...............Powers and Competences of EP Committees...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Repackaging of Pharmaceutical Products and Parallel Trade in the EU
    Legal Feature The Repackaging of Pharmaceutical Products and Parallel Trade in the EU Héctor Armengod and Laura Melusine Baudenbacher examine how European case law affects trademark owners’ ability to lawfully oppose further marketing of their repackaged product. The question of whether pharmaceutical products can be repackaged by parallel traders has been – and continues to be – a recurrent topic before the European Court of Justice. In the European Union, each member state, based on its own healthcare policy, dictates Price differences among the prices of the drugs sold in its territory. This leads to significant differences in the price of EU member states lead to pharmaceuticals across the EU. These differences create business opportunities for parallel business opportunities for importers who can buy the drugs in those countries where they are cheaper and import them in parallel importers the more expensive ones, thereby obtaining a lucrative margin. The packaging and labelling of pharmaceuticals is highly regulated both at EU and member state level, and a product acquired in a given member state often needs to be repackaged before it is placed on the market of a different member state. Repackaging can interfere with the trademark rights of the original supplier of the product. The protection of trademark rights has been recognised by the ECJ as an essential element in the system of undistorted competition which the EC Treaty seeks to establish and maintain1. The exercise of these rights can, however, be in conflict with the principle of free movement of goods, which is one of the cornerstones of the EU internal market.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Rights Management in the Digital Single Market
    Implementation of the EU Trade Mark Directive 2015 Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Office Implementation of the EU Trade Mark Directive 2015 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 Relevance of UK withdrawal from the EU ......................................................... 1 Our approach to implementation ...................................................................... 2 About this consultation ............................................................................................ 2 Proposed amendments in detail ............................................................................. 3 Article 3: Signs of which a trade mark may consist .......................................... 3 Article 3: Removal of requirement for ‘graphic representation’ in section 1 - new file formats ................................................................. 3 Article 3 (and Article 39.2): ‘Competent authorities’ ............................... 4 Article 4: Absolute grounds for refusal ............................................................ 5 Article 4.1(i),(j),(k) & (l) – specific references to geographical indications, traditional terms for wine, etc .............................................. 5 Article 4.5: distinctive character acquired after application date, but before registration date (optional) ............................................ 6 Article 5: Relative Grounds for refusal or invalidity ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • CASE 1 3Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India
    CASE 13 Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India THE BEVERAGE BATTLEFIELD had to resort to using a costly imported substitute, estergum, or they had to fi nance their own R&D in order to fi nd a substitute In 2007, the President and CEO of Coca-Cola asserted that Coke ingredient. Many failed and quickly withdrew from the industry. has had a rather rough run in India; but now it seems to be getting Competing with the segment of carbonated soft drinks is an- its positioning right. Similarly, PepsiCo’s Asia chief asserted that other beverage segment composed of noncarbonated fruit drinks. India is the beverage battlefi eld for this decade and beyond. These are a growth industry because Indian consumers perceive Even though the government had opened its doors wide to for- fruit drinks to be natural, healthy, and tasty. The leading brand has eign companies, the experience of the world’s two giant soft drinks traditionally been Parle’s Frooti, a mango-fl avored drink, which companies in India during the 1990s and the beginning of the new was also exported to franchisees in the United States, Britain, Por- millennium was not a happy one. Both companies experienced a tugal, Spain, and Mauritius. range of unexpected problems and diffi cult situations that led them to recognize that competing in India requires special knowledge, skills, and local expertise. In many ways, Coke and Pepsi manag- OPENING INDIAN MARKET ers had to learn the hard way that “what works here” does not In 1991, India experienced an economic crisis of exceptional se- always “work there.” “The environment in India is challenging, but verity, triggered by the rise in imported oil prices following the we’re learning how to crack it,” says an industry leader.
    [Show full text]