DOCSLIB.ORG

KOTIDO DISTRICT: Water Sources by Operational Status & Accessibility (Aug 2010)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
KOTIDO DISTRICT: Water Sources by Operational Status & Accessibility (Aug 2010) IMU, UNOCHA Uganda http://www.ugandaclusters.ug http://ochaonline.un.org KOTIDO DISTRICT: Water Sources by Operational Status & Accessibility (Aug 2010) "! "! KOTIDO TC AREA"! "# "# "# "# 4400 "! KOTYANG KOTIDO # "! " "O NORTH 5300 18500 " "! "O "! LOSILANG "O"O "! "O ! ! "" "! "! "!"! 3300 "Þ"Þ "! "! NARIKAPET "!"# "Þ "! "! "! KITGUM "! "Þ "Þ 2500"!"Þ KOTIDO"Þ "Þ CENTRAL"Þ "! "# "! "Þ "! "O ! # ! ! " " ""! " ! "! ! " ! ! "! "! " " " "!! 5900 "! "! 6800 "! "! LOOKOROK "# KOTIDO KAABONG "! EAST KOTIDO TC "! "Þ "! "! KACHERI KOTIDO WEST 13200 LOLETIO "! 4500 18200 "! 6400 "! "# "! LOPUYO KACHERI 5500 "! "! KANAWAT LOKADELI "! "! ! "! "!"!"! 15100 " " "! 4300 17700 "! "! "! KACHERI HA KAMORU ! LOKIDING " "! ! "! ! 18500 "! "!" " "! "! "! "! LOSILANG ! ! "! "! "! "! "! "! "!"! "!"! "!! RENGEN "! " "! "! "! "! "! "! "! !"! "! "! "! ! "! "! # ! "! "!" "!!" "! "! ! " ! " "! "! ! "! "# " "! "!" "! "! ! ! "! ! "! "!"! "! " " "! ""!"! ! "! ! "! "! "! "! ""! "! "! "! "! "! "! "!! "! " "! # "#!! # "! "! " # O " "" " # " ! " "! ! " "! " "! "# "! # 6600 ! "! NAPONGA "!!"! "# " "! "! ! ! ! "!" "!!Þ "?!NAKWAKWA " "! "! "! ""# "!""# "! "!! 14200 3900 " "! " "Þ! ""! 5900 # "!"! "# ! "! LOSAKUCA "# "! "! "# "! "! " "# KOTYANG "!"! ! WATAKAO 9600 "# " # "! #"# "# " "! "! "! " "! "O# !"! 5300 ! "! " # !! "! " # " ! # " ! "!" #"! ! ! " "O " " ""! "! "! "! " ! ""! "#"# "O! ! ! #"! ! "! " " " "! ""OO!! ! " " ""!"!"!"!"#! """!""Þ!!! # "! "" # ! ! "! "!"#"ÞÞ" "! ""! "!"!"! "!#"!" "! NAKAPELIMORU " " "! "Þ!"!Þ"Þ!"! LOOKOROK ""!" "# "! "! !"OÞ#"Þ!"Þ"Þ "! "!"ÞÞÞ# "! "!! "!""!"!"# "!"! "#"Þ"!"" "! "! "!"! "!"!" "! "! ! !"#! "! "! "! "! "!"! "! "! """!"! "! ! "! "! !"! "! "# "! "!"# # # " ! "! ! "! "! "#" " #KOTIDO! "TCÞ "! "!"! "!"#" !! "! """! " #"! "#"! "! "" "! 18200!"!" # "! "! "! "!"! "# " #"! "! ! !"! # KOTIDO"! "! "!LOLETIO"! " ! KANAWAT "! " " "! " "! " !"!! "!"!""! "! "!"! "! "! "! 15100 ! "! "! "! "# "! "! "! ! ! " "!"! "! "! KOTIDO "!" "!"# "!" "! "! "! "! "! "! "! "# "! "! "# "! ! "#"! ! "! " POTONGOR/KADOCHA "!# "!" "! "! "! "! "! ! "! "! !"!! " "! "! "" # "! "#" ! "! "! "! "! "! "#"!"# "! MOROTO "!"! # "! "# "! "!" "! 4200 "! LOKITELAEBU "! PANYANGARA PADER 8400 7500 "! RIKITAE LOPOTHA 18600 ABIM 17700 KAMORU NAPAK "! KOTIDO DISTRICT: WATER SOURCES BY SUB-COUNTY, ACCESSIBILITY, AND OPERATIONAL STATUS Area (Sq.Km) Dec 2009 Aug 2010 Accessibility Water Points Status Accessibility Water Points Status Total Pop Area Area Area Area S/N Sub-County (2010 Non- Non Unkno Total Non Unkno Total *Populat within within Functi within within Functi Projection) Populate Functi wn Water Functi wn Water ed 1km 2km onal 1km 2km onal d onal Status Points onal Status Points buffer buffer buffer buffer 1 KACHERI 24100 834.09 577.62 14.15% 28.29% 42 16 1 59 16.32% 30.47% 45 16 1 62 2 KOTIDO 42000 579.96 15.17% 32.51% 50 28 78 15.17% 32.51% 50 28 9 87 3 KOTIDO TC 21500 22.64 100.00% 100.00% 40 13 1 54 100.00% 100.00% 40 12 2 54 Notes: 4 NAKAPELIMORU 24300 417.55 13.55% 19.57% 47 23 70 13.55% 21.08% 49 23 72 1. Water source information presented in this map is based on available information received 5 PANYANGARA 62000 865.25 11.62% 17.44% 56 28 84 11.99% 18.89% 57 25 10 92 during Nov 2008 - Dec 2009 from District Water Offices and district partners (mainly IRC & FAO). 6 RENGEN 30700 403.43 27.27% 46.74% 68 23 91 27.27% 46.74% 68 22 10 100 Therefore, water source coverage and operational status level change over time. For updated information, please contact directly to District Water Office/partners in respective district. Water Points out of boundary 84128412 Kotido Total 204,600 834.09 2866.45 16.03% 27.76% 311 131 2 448 16.58% 28.86% 317 126 32 479 2. Approximate area falls inside 1km or 2km accessibility zones are treated as accessible & falls Notes: LIRA outside are treated as not accessible. Accessibility buffers and ratio of area access within 1. Accessible area calculated based on Total Populated Area (i.e. excluded other area, such as water body, game reserve, range land, national park, etc). buffers are derived only for operational (functional) water points. 2. Approximate ratio of accessible populated area within sub-county are derived by using GIS technique. 1km & 2km radius circle is equivalent to 3.14 and 3. Accessibility is based on aerial distance. Assumed that people travel most direct route in plain 12.57 sq.km area respectively (using formula A = Pie*R*R). area. Uganda Overview Legend Data Sources: This map is a work in progress. Please contact the IMU/Ocha Sudan Water Source Type Operational Status National Boundary Landuse Type Admin Boundaries - UBOS 2006 as soon as possible with any Landuse - UBOC 2006 corrections. ! Boreholes (372 Nos.) " Functional (309 Nos.) District Boundary Forest Reserve Demography - UBOS Projected Population Congo Road Network - FAO, District Partners, UNOCHA O " Map Disclaimer: (Dem. Shallow well (10 Nos.) Temp Down (48 Nos.) Label Sub-County Boundary Game Reserve Thematic - IRC/FAO/DWO/Partners, Aug - Nov 09 K Rep) Þ (Updates by DWO as of Aug 2010) Tapstands (17 Nos.) " Non-functional (78 Nos.) Label Parish Boundary National Park The boundaries and names 06123 Draft shown and the designations ?! Protected Spring (1 No.) " Unknown (32 Nos.) Rangeland Kenya Motorable Road used on this map do not imply Kilometers # Unknown/Others (67 Nos.) Lakes/Water Body official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. 2 km Access 1 km Access Map Prepare: 20 Aug, 2010 (IMU/UNOCHA, Kampala) Tanzania Projected Population 2010 Buffers Rwanda 999 Buffers File: UG-WASH-49_A3_20Aug2010_Kotido District Water Sources by Operational Status & Accessibility.mdx (nk).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Uganda Humanitarian Update
    UGANDA HUMANITARIAN UPDATE MAY – JUNE 2010 I. HIGHLIGHTS AMID HEAVY RAINS, HUMANITARIAN ACCESS IN PARTS OF KARAMOJA AND TESO HAMPERED BY DETERIORATING ROAD CONDITIONS OVER 1,000 CHOLERA CASES REGISTERED IN KARAMOJA SINCE APRIL 2010 90% OF IDPS IN NORTHERN UGANDA NO LONGER LIVING IN CAMPS, BUT LAND CONFLICTS AND LANDMINES IMPEDING RETURN IN SOME AREAS II. SECURITY AND ACCESS SECURITY The general situation in Karamoja remained fragile, according to the United Nations Department for Safety and Security (UNDSS). Cattle raids, including on protected kraals, particularly affected Moroto and Kotido, with some resulting in fierce clashes between the Uganda People’s Defence Forces and the raiders. In South Karamoja incidents associated with food distributions involved theft of food and non-food items (NFIs), and attacks on food distributors as well as on food recipients. Following three road ambushes in Alerek sub-county of Abim District during the month, UNDSS issued an advisory limiting UN movement along the Abim-Kotido road to between 09.00Hrs and 16.00Hrs with effect from 28 June 2010. Three civilians were killed in one of those ambushes. In northern Uganda, Amuru District officials and partners carried out a joint assessment in the wake of a violent land dispute that occurred in Koli village of Pabbo sub-county on 23 June. Preliminary findings indicated that one person was killed and several others injured in the dispute involving two clans. Some 40 huts were torched and many members of either clan had fled the village. Also of concern in the region during the reporting period were raids by illegally armed Karamojong, particularly in Pader District.
    [Show full text]
  • Karamoja Rapid Crop and Food Security Assessment
    KARAMOJA RAPID CROP AND FOOD SECURITY ASSESSMENT KAMPALA, AUGUST 2013 This Rapid Assessment was conducted by: World Food Programme (WFP) - Elliot Vhurumuku; Hamidu Tusiime; Eunice Twanza; Alex Ogenrwoth; Swaleh Gule; James Odong; and Joseph Ndawula Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) - Bernard Onzima; Joseph Egabu; Paddy Namurebire; and Michael Lokiru Office of the Prime Minister (OPM) - Johnson Oworo; Timothy Ojwi; Jimmy Ogwang; and Catherine Nakalembe Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries (MAAIF) - James Obo; and Stephen Kataama Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 2 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Background .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2. Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3. Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1. Sampling methodology .................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2. Selection of respondents ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Livelihood Dynamics in Northern Karamoja
    LIVELIHOOD DYNAMICS IN NORTHERN KARAMOJA A Participatory Baseline Study for the Growth Health and Governance Program John Burns – Gezu Bekele – Darlington Akabwai May 2013 II Table of Contents SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Research Background and Overview .................................................................................... 4 1.2 Research Questions .............................................................................................................. 5 2. METHODS .................................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Study Overview ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Sampling ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Method and Size ............................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Data Collection Methods ....................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Pre-Testing ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • KOTIDO District Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profile August 2014
    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA KARAMOJA KOTIDO District HAzArd, risk And VulnerAbility Profile August 2014 KOTIDO HAZARD, RISK AND VULNERABILITY PROFILE | i With support from: United Nations Development Programme Plot 11, Yusuf Lule Road P.O. Box 7184 Kampala, Uganda For more information: www.undp.org ii | KOTIDO HAZARD, RISK AND VULNERABILITY PROFILE Contents Acronyms.....................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgement........................................................................................................1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 3 Objectives...... .............................................................................................................3 Methodology ................................................................................................................3 Overview of the District ...............................................................................................6 Brief district history ..................................................................................................6 Location and administrative structure ......................................................................6 Ethnicity ....................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Tradition in Transition
    OCTOBER 2012 Strengthening the humanity and dignity of people in crisis through knowledge and practice Tradition in Transition: Customary Authority in Karamoja, Uganda Khristopher Carlson, Keith Proctor, Elizabeth Stites, and Darlington Akabwai Tradition in Transition: Customary Authority in Karamoja, Uganda Khristopher Carlson, Keith Proctor, Elizabeth Stites, and Darlington Akabwai ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS he authors wish to gratefully acknowledge Irish Aid Kampala in supporting Tthis work and serving as partners throughout the process. At Irish Aid we thank in particular Pronch Murray, Wendy Kasujja and Fearghal MacCarthaigh. The Uganda portion of the work was made possible through the efforts of our colleagues Irene Emanikor, Joyce Ilukori, Luke Lonyiko, Joshua Kidon, Michael Kapolon and Samson Lorika. Also in Uganda we thank Mark Lochan and Oscar Okech for their contributions and insight. Administrative support at Tufts University was provided by Anita Robbins, Elizabeth O’Leary, Rosa Pendenza and Ann O’Brien. Khristopher Carlson took the photographs and Bridget Snow did the layout. The authors are responsible for any errors or omission in this report, and correspondence should be directed to [email protected] or dakabwai09@ yahoo.com. About the Feinstein International Center The Feinstein International Center at Tufts University develops and promotes operational and policy responses to protect and strengthen the lives and livelihoods of people living in crisis-affected and marginalized communities. The Center works globally in partnership with national and international organizations to bring about institutional changes that enhance effective policy reform and promote best practice. This report is available on-line at fic.tufts.edu 2 Tradition in Transition: Customary Authority in Karamoja, Uganda Khristopher Carlson, Keith Proctor, Elizabeth Stites, and Darlington Akabwai TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Karamoja Situational Analysis
    CARE INTERNATIONAL IN UGANDA Karamoja Situational Analysis Northern Uganda Women‟s Empowerment Programme (NUWEP) December 2012 – January 2013 Sandra Ayoo, Robert Opio, Oliver T. Kakisa 12/28/2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................................. II LISTS OF TABLES, FIGURES AND BOXES ................................................................................................................ III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... IV 1.0 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 Specific study objectives ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 The study questions ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 STUDY APPROACH AND METHODS .......................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Data Collection Instruments Protocol and Procedures ....................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Selection of
    [Show full text]
  • Generosity in the Time Ofcovid-19
    GENEROSITY IN THE TIME OF COVID-19 Stories of giving in the time of the coronavirus pandemic in Uganda. Period Covered March 31st to April 30th, 2020 #OmutimaOmugabi About CivSource Africa CivSource Africa is a philanthropy support and advisory organization committed to nurturing a more sustainable, effective and connected civil society that advances the dignity and voices of all people. We do this through promoting reflective, responsive, and accountable philanthropic practice. CivSource Africa is also passionate about promoting African philanthropy and telling the stories of African giving and generosity. Plot 18, Balikuddembe Road, Naguru Kampala, Uganda P.O Box 4310 Tel: +256 393 224 056 civsourceafrica.com [email protected] https://www.facebook.com/CivSourceAfrica https://twitter.com/CivsourceAfrica WHERE PHILANTHROPY MEETS CIVIL SOCIETY Table of contents Forward 3 Acknowledegments 4 Acronyms 5 Background 6 Chapter 1 8 Giving by Private Sector Chapter 2 19 Individual Giving Chapter 3 28 Gving by Artists Chapter 4 32 Giving in Collectives Chapter 5 36 A Regional Glance Chapter 6 53 Giving Within Refugee Communities Chapter 7 58 Giving: Perspectives Forward t gives us great pleasure to bring you distribute the items received to the right Ithis first of several reports about giving beneficiaries, as well as accountability during COVID-19 lock down in Uganda. for all that was given. In fact, this report Right from the announcement of the first just shares what was given, and we hope lock down on 31st March 2020, we started it can be used as a basis to demand noticing reports of giving and we decided accountability for where and how and by that we needed to capture this momentous whom the resources were used.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Karamoja Land
    TENURE IN MYSTERY : Status of Land under Wildlife, Forestry and Mining Concessions in Karamoja Region, Uganda By; Margaret A. Rugadya, Herbert Kamusiime and Eddie Nsamba-Gayiiya This study was undertaken with support from TROCAIRE Uganda and Oxfam GB in Uganda to Associates Research Uganda August 2010 i About the Authors: Margaret A. Rugadya is a public policy analyst with bias to socio-economic and legal fields relating to land and natural resources management. Currently is a PhD research fellow at the University of Maastricht, the Netherlands. Herbert Kamusiime is an agricultural economist, widely experienced in socio-economic research, holding a Master degree. Currently is the Executive Director of Associates Research Uganda, a policy research trust. Eddie Nsamba-Gayiiya is a land economist, holding a Master degree and 25 years of service in the field of valuation with the Government of Uganda. Currently is the Executive Director of Consultant Surveyors and Planners, a private consultancy firm. Christine Kajumba is a research manager at Associates Research Uganda, with 6 years of coordinating the field surveys and data collection in different parts of Uganda. MAP OF KARAMOJA ii Source: Archives, 2010 iii OVERVIEW Tenure in Mystery collates information on land under conservation, forestry and mining in the Karamoja region. Whereas significant changes in the status of land tenure took place with the Parliamentary approval for degazettement of approximately 54% of the land area under wildlife conservation in 2002, little else happened to deliver this update to the beneficiary communities in the region. Instead enclaves of information emerged within the elite and political leadership, by means of which personal interests and rewards were being secured and protected.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized Republic of Uganda Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries REGIONAL PASTORAL LIVELIHOOD RESILIENCE PROJECT-RPLRP Public Disclosure Authorized SOCIAL ASSESSMENT Public Disclosure Authorized FINAL REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized October, 2013 i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................xiii 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Status of livestock production in North-Eastern Districts ..................................................... 1 1.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Environmental and Social Challenges in the Project Area ............................................................ 4 1.3.1 Project Components ............................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Rational of the Social Assessment ................................................................................................ 5 1.5 Objectives of the Social Impact Assessment ................................................................................. 6 1.6 Study
    [Show full text]
  • Kotido Town Council Basic Services
    (Basic Service Accessibility) Sub-County Maps: 1. Kotido TC 6. Nakapelimoru 2. Kotido 7. Panyangara 3. Rengen 8. Kacheri INFORMATION MANAGEMENT UNIT UNOCHA, UGANDA August 2009 IMU, UNOCHA Uganda http://www.ugandaclusters.ug KOTIDO DISTRICT: KOTIDO TOWN COUNCIL BASIC SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY (Aug 2009) http://ochaonline.un.org 34°5'0"E ! ! Functional Basic Services Total Numbers Uganda Overview Basic Services ! District Kotido TC Health Service Type ! Sudan ! 2HC-II 11 3 HC-III 5 1 ! ! 4HC-IV 1 1 ! School Type Congo 1Primary 26 4 em. Rep) 2 Secondary 2 1 ! ! Water Points 1 Boreholes 126 48 ! ! 2 Others 20 15 ! Kenya Notes: ! 1. Approximate area falls inside 5 km buffers (health), 2.5km buffers! Tanzania (education) are accessible area & falls outside are no accessible. Rwanda 2. Accessibility buffers are based on aerial distance. Assumed! that people travel most direct route in plain area. 3. Accessibility presented in this map is based on available location! of Health Centres & Schools from the District. Therefore, accessibility level change over time. For updated service information, please contact directly to respective district office. ! KOTYANG ! ! 17000 ! ! 4900 ! ! ! 4100 ! LOSILANG RENGEN ! ! ! ! ! KOTIDO ! NORTH ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ")! ! ")! ")! ")! ! ! Kotido ! ! ! !qÆ Kotido ")Þ Army ")! ! k ! ! ! ! ! 3000 ! ! ")Þ NARIKAPET ! Þ ! ! ") ! ! ") Lomukura Þ! ! ! ! k") ! ! ! ")! ! ")Þ ")!")Þ ")Þ ! ")! ! ! KOTIDO ")Þ! ! ! 13900 ! Þ ! ! ") ! Þ CENTRALÞ ! ! ") !") ")! ! ! ! Þ ! Kotido Kotido 2300 ") ! ! "))" ")! ! Mixed! ! !
    [Show full text]
  • MOROTO DISTRICT: Livelihood Zones KAABONG Uganda Overview Kothoniok (! Jie )(! Lothagam Sudan Kotido (! !
    IMU, UNOCHA Uganda http://www.ugandaclusters.ug http://ochaonline.un.org KARAMOJA SUB-REGION: Livelihood Zones (June 2010) SUDAN KATHILE KARENGA KAPEDO KALAPATA KAABONG KAABONG LOYORO KAABONG TC KITGUM SIDOK LOLELIA RENGEN KACHERI NAKAPELIMORU KOTIDO TC KOTIDO KOTIDO KENYA PADER ALEREK PANYANGARA RUPA ABIM ABIM LOTUKEI LOPEI NYAKWAE MORULEM NORTHERN DIVISION NGOLERIET SOUTHERN DIVISION LOKOPO KATIKEKILE MOROTO MATANY LIRA NADUNGET LOTOME LORENGEDWAT LOROO AMURIA IRIIRI NABILATUK DOKOLO KAKOMONGOLE KATAKWI LOLACHAT NAKAPIRIPIRIT NAKAPIRIPIRIT TC AMUDAT KABERAMAIDO NAMALU MORUITA AMUDAT SOROTI KARITA AMUDAT KUMI SIRONKO KAPCHORWA BUKEDEA KAMULI Uganda Overview Legend Data Sources: This map is a work in progress. Please Sudan contact the IMU/Ocha as soon as Livelihood Zones Admin Boundaries/Centers - UBOS 2006 National Boundary possible with any corrections. Thematic - FEWSNET, FAO/District Local Government, Central and Southern Karamoja Pastoral Zone District Boundary DAO, May 2010 Draft Congo Eastern Lowland Maize Beans Rice Zone Label Sub-County Boundary (Dem. Karamoja Livestock Sorghum Bulrush Millet Zone Map Disclaimer: Rep) Parish Boundary NATIONAL PARK 010 20 40 The boundaries and names shown Kenya NE Karamoja Pastoral Zone and the designations used on this Kilometers map do not imply official endorsement NE Sorghum Simsim Maize Livestock Map Prepare: 9 June, 2010 (IMU/UNOCHA, Kampala) K or acceptance by the United Nations. South Kitgum Pader Simsim Groundnuts Sorghum Cattle Zone Updated: 10 June, 2010 Tanzania Rwanda URBAN FileUG-Livelihood-06_A3_10June2010_Karamoja
    [Show full text]
  • KOTIDO DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT Between All Partners by Institutionalizing Mechanisms to Foster Regular Engagements E.G
    CALL TO ACTION THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA NUTRITION GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES/ GAPS CALL FOR ACTION RESPONSIBLE AREA OFFICE Coordination and Inadequate Mechanisms to foster Ensure functionality of the coordination CAO/DNFP partnerships: sufficient information sharing structures at the district and subcounty level KOTIDO DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT between all partners by institutionalizing mechanisms to foster regular engagements e.g. meetings to allow ADVOCACY BRIEF ON STRENGTHENING NUTRITION GOVERNANCE FOR MULTI-SECTORAL RESPONSE joint planning, monitoring, Technical support and reporting, Joint reviews, from various stakeholders Integrate Multisectoral nutrition coordination events in the district annual calendar of activities Systems capacity Building Lack of clarity on the contribution Conduct in-service training on nutrition Administration/ (functional, institutional to nutrition sensitive programing sensitive programming for the following DNCC and Human capacities) for the nontraditional frontline carders; community development departments (community-based officers, agricultural extension officers and services, education, water, Veterinary assistants, health assistants production, commercial services) Avail Monitoring, supervision and reporting tools to support Coordination structures at different levels of the local government in doing their work Nutrition Coordination structures district for benchmarking information, and the Develop Capacity development plan for (committees) were established at the district key findings of which have been
    [Show full text]