DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Outline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Outline 1 Securing Peace and Promoting Prosperity in Karamoja Quarterly Report Third Quarter – April 1, 2018 to June 30, 2018 Submission Date: July 31, 2018 Agreement Number: 72061718CA00001 Activity Start Date and End Date: November 15, 2017 to November 15, 2019 AOR Name: Morris Nsamba Submitted by: David Gatare, Chief of Party Mercy Corps 4th Floor, Embassy Plaza, Ggaba Road P.O. Box 32021, Clock Tower, Kampala, Uganda Tel: Tel +256 (0)414 501 014 | mobile: +256 (0)779 484169 Email: [email protected] Copied to: [email protected] This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development Uganda Mission (USAID/Uganda). 1 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS List all acronyms and abbreviations pertinent to the activity. The first time a word requiring an acronym or abbreviation is used in the body of the report, spell out the word in full with the acronym or abbreviation in parentheses. Thereafter, use only the acronym or abbreviation. AMELP Activity Monitoring Evaluation and Learning Plan AOR Agreements Officer Representative AWOTID Abim Women Together in Development COP Chief of Party CEWERU Conflict Early Warning and Early Response Unit CRS Catholic Relief Services DADO Dodoth Agro-Pastoralism Development Organization DO Development Objective GBV Gender Based Violence IO Intelligence Officer IR Intermediate Result LC V Local Council Five-District Chairperson NGO Non-Governmental Organization ONA Organizational Network Assessment OPI Organizational Performance Index RDC Resident District Commissioner TH Trauma Healing UPDF Uganda Peoples Defense Forces USAID United States Agency for International Development VAT Value Added Tax Template Last Updated: June 8, 2018 2 ACTIVITY OVERVIEW/SUMMARY Securing Peace and Promoting Prosperity in Karamoja Activity Name: Securing Peace and Promoting Prosperity in Karamoja Project: Activity Start Date and Nov 15, 2017-Nov 15,2019 End Date: Name of Prime Mercy Corps Implementing Partner: [Contract/Agreement] # 72061718CA00001 Number: Dodoth Agro-Pastoralist Development Organization (DADO): Name of Sub-awardees $127,043 and Dollar Amounts: AWOTID: $100,053 Major Counterpart Local Governments, CEWERU Organizations: Geographic Coverage Moroto, Kotido, Kaabong, and Abim (districts. Also note any changes): April – June, 2018 Reporting Period: 3 ACTIVITY INFORMATION 1.1 Activity Description/Introduction Short and concise introductory section that gives a quick overview of the activity, goals/objectives, target beneficiaries, geographical locations, etc. This is a standardized paragraph that can be used in each quarterly report. It should be BRIEF, no more than 500 words USAID’s Securing Peace and Promoting Prosperity in Karamoja Activity is a two-year Conflict Mitigation and Management project made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). It is implemented in Kaabong, Kotido, Abim and Moroto Districts of Karamoja, Uganda, and runs from November 15, 2017 to November 15, 2019. The Activity is implemented by Mercy Corps, Dodoth Agro Pastoralists Development Organization (DADO), and Abim Women Together in Development (AWOTID). Objectives: The project brings communities from Karamoja together across lines-of-conflict to address the social, economic, environmental, and political issues at risk of fueling violence. The total population (indirect beneficiaries) targeted is 561,761 (2014 population and housing census for Kaabong, Abim, Kotido and Moroto). This will be achieved through three interlinked objectives: Objective 1: Supports 744 (direct beneficiaries) people who are part of the council of elders, other female and male leaders, and reformed warriors, in their work to help their communities deal with past experiences of violence by re-building broken social bonds and providing mental health and psychosocial support activities. In parallel, Mercy Corps will bring the various leaders together with youth clubs to identify shared interests and design development projects, thereby promoting cooperation across lines- of-conflict. Stronger relationships between communities no longer plagued by trauma will help prevent future violence. Objective 2: Continue to work with 1,280 (direct beneficiaries) council of elders, other female and male leaders, and youth clubs, strengthening their skills and relationships necessary to prevent conflict and de- escalate violent disputes driven by natural resources in general and livestock theft specifically. Objective 2 connects these actors to the wider conflict and early warning network at district, sub-county and parish levels across the Karamoja region. Objective 3: Through 960 (direct beneficiaries) key leaders, boost civil society’s capacities and resources to educate and empower community groups on land rights and advocacy. The goal is to bring together communities, government and the private sector for land use and reform to secure more equitable land access for women and men, and reduce the risk of conflict with government or private sector on land use. The project builds on partners (Mercy Corps, DADO and AWOTID) previous and existing conflict management and resilience projects in Karamoja and the Karamoja Cluster as a whole. The USAID- funded Alternatives to Conflict in Karamoja & Turkana (ACKT) addressed causes of cross-border conflict between the Ik and Dodoth of Uganda and the Turkana of Kenya. Building Bridges to Peace promoted inter-ethnic cooperation through ecological projects, which increased trust and perceptions of security. Growth, Health and Governance (GHG) bolstered local capacity to improve governance and mitigate conflict. AWOTID has implemented (as part of GHG) activities with a focus on building the Template Last Updated: June 8, 2018 4 capacity of land management structures in Abim. In PEACE III, Mercy Corps and DADO are working with Pact Kenya to strengthen conflict management capacity within and linkages between local, national, and regional actors to address cross-border conflict. Currently the project has initiated collaboration with Mercy Corps Apolou, another USAID Food for Peace project implemented in the Karamoja region. Photo: RDC of Kaabong District talking to Activity supported Losilang Youth Group in Kotido on handing over more guns to the security agencies. 5 1.2 Results to Date Table 1(a): PMP/Project Indicator Progress - USAID Standard Indicators and Project Custom Indicators DO 1: Community and household resilience in select areas and target population increased Quarterly Status – FY Baseline data FY 2018 Annual Comment(s) 2018 Performan Data Annual ce Indicator Annual Source Cumulative Achieved Year Value Cumulative Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Planned to Date Actual target1 (in %) Intermediate Result (IR) 1: Women leaders and youth empowered to provide trauma healing and advance reconciliation. Trauma healing (TH) sessions Event 0 0 120 4 0 0 4 3% Loyoro, Sdok conducted by the project forms and Lolelia sub trainees counties Percent of individuals who have Event 0 0 15% 0% 0% 0% 0% % undergone trauma healing forms working with former protagonists Projects implemented by 4 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 formerly conflicting parties Sub-IR 1.1: Capacities of women and youth to conduct trauma healing sessions and provide psychosocial support improved Number of individuals trained 0 0 64 60 0 60 0 94% Trauma Attenda in trauma healing and Healing nce psychosocial support Facilitators sheets training PS.6.2-4 Number of people 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0% Annual target participating in USG-supported Event events, trainings, or activities forms designed to build mass support for peace and reconciliation Number of Women and Youth Attenda 0 0 30 8 0 0 8 27% Loyoro, Sidok facilitating trauma healing nce and Lolelia sheets 1 When applicable Template Last Updated: June 8, 2018 Sub-IR 1.2: Youth groups empowered to actively to engage in peace-building initiatives. 6 PS.6.2-2 Number of USG- 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0% funded events, trainings, or Event activities designed to build forms support for peace or reconciliation on a mass scale Intermediate Result (IR) 2: Formal and informal structures to prevent and resolve natural resource disputes and livestock theft strengthened. Number of community Event 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0% structures with trained forms mediators involved in dispute and mediation Attenda nce sheets Number of Disputes mediated 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0% Event by community structures with forms trained mediators Sub-IR 2.1: Women’s role in early warning mechanisms strengthened Number of local women 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0% participating in a substantive Event role or position in peace- forms building process supported with USG assistance (F 1.6-6) Sub-IR 2.2: Dispute resolution capacity of peace building actors enhanced. PS.6.2-3 Number of USG 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 25% Mediators supported events, trainings, or training activities designed to build Event support for peace or forms reconciliation among key actors to the conflict PS.6.2-1 Number of new 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 25% Losilang youth groups or initiatives created group through USG funding, Event dedicated to resolving the forms conflict or the drivers of the conflict Intermediate Result (IR) 3: Improved collaboration between communities and other actors on land. Number of Action points or 7 0 0 0 0 0% Event 0 0 Resolutions resulting from forms consultative process Number of Implemented 5 0 0 0 0 0% 7 Event 0 0 undertakings resulting from forms consultative processes Sub-IR 3.1: Improved community awareness of their land rights and land laws. Number of Community 0 0 2000 23 0 0 0 1.2% members attending awareness Event sessions on land rights and land forms laws Sub-IR 3.2: Improved capacity of Area Land Committees & District Land Boards in land administration % of the DLBs and ALCs Event 0 0 30% 0 0 0 0 0% trained in land administration forms and management. and Attenda nce sheets In the table, include the Project Management Plan (PMP) and project relevant indicators that are required for quarterly reporting. Include Intermediate Result (IR), sub IR, and Guiding Principles indicators that apply to the activity, special Initiative indicators, F-standard indicators, and activity specific indicators.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Karamoja and Northern Uganda Comparative Analysis of Livelihood Recovery in the Post-Conflict Periods November 2019
    Karamoja and Northern Uganda Comparative analysis of livelihood recovery in the post-conflict periods November 2019 Karamoja and Northern Uganda Comparative analysis of livelihood recovery in the post-conflict periods November 2019 Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Tufts University Rome, 2019 REQUIRED CITATION FAO and Tufts University. 2019. Comparative analysis of livelihood recovery in the post-conflict periods – Karamoja and Northern Uganda. November 2019. Rome. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or Tufts University concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO or the University in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO or the University. ISBN 978-92-5-131747-1 (FAO) ©FAO and Tufts University, 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Humanitarian Update
    UGANDA HUMANITARIAN UPDATE MAY – JUNE 2010 I. HIGHLIGHTS AMID HEAVY RAINS, HUMANITARIAN ACCESS IN PARTS OF KARAMOJA AND TESO HAMPERED BY DETERIORATING ROAD CONDITIONS OVER 1,000 CHOLERA CASES REGISTERED IN KARAMOJA SINCE APRIL 2010 90% OF IDPS IN NORTHERN UGANDA NO LONGER LIVING IN CAMPS, BUT LAND CONFLICTS AND LANDMINES IMPEDING RETURN IN SOME AREAS II. SECURITY AND ACCESS SECURITY The general situation in Karamoja remained fragile, according to the United Nations Department for Safety and Security (UNDSS). Cattle raids, including on protected kraals, particularly affected Moroto and Kotido, with some resulting in fierce clashes between the Uganda People’s Defence Forces and the raiders. In South Karamoja incidents associated with food distributions involved theft of food and non-food items (NFIs), and attacks on food distributors as well as on food recipients. Following three road ambushes in Alerek sub-county of Abim District during the month, UNDSS issued an advisory limiting UN movement along the Abim-Kotido road to between 09.00Hrs and 16.00Hrs with effect from 28 June 2010. Three civilians were killed in one of those ambushes. In northern Uganda, Amuru District officials and partners carried out a joint assessment in the wake of a violent land dispute that occurred in Koli village of Pabbo sub-county on 23 June. Preliminary findings indicated that one person was killed and several others injured in the dispute involving two clans. Some 40 huts were torched and many members of either clan had fled the village. Also of concern in the region during the reporting period were raids by illegally armed Karamojong, particularly in Pader District.
    [Show full text]
  • Karamoja Rapid Crop and Food Security Assessment
    KARAMOJA RAPID CROP AND FOOD SECURITY ASSESSMENT KAMPALA, AUGUST 2013 This Rapid Assessment was conducted by: World Food Programme (WFP) - Elliot Vhurumuku; Hamidu Tusiime; Eunice Twanza; Alex Ogenrwoth; Swaleh Gule; James Odong; and Joseph Ndawula Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) - Bernard Onzima; Joseph Egabu; Paddy Namurebire; and Michael Lokiru Office of the Prime Minister (OPM) - Johnson Oworo; Timothy Ojwi; Jimmy Ogwang; and Catherine Nakalembe Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries (MAAIF) - James Obo; and Stephen Kataama Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 2 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Background .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2. Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3. Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1. Sampling methodology .................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2. Selection of respondents ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 Ehealth MONTHLY BULLETIN
    WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 eHEALTH MONTHLY BULLETIN Welcome to this 1st issue of the eHealth Bulletin, a production 2015 of the WHO Country Office. Disease October November December This monthly bulletin is intended to bridge the gap between the Cholera existing weekly and quarterly bulletins; focus on a one or two disease/event that featured prominently in a given month; pro- Typhoid fever mote data utilization and information sharing. Malaria This issue focuses on cholera, typhoid and malaria during the Source: Health Facility Outpatient Monthly Reports, Month of December 2015. Completeness of monthly reporting DHIS2, MoH for December 2015 was above 90% across all the four regions. Typhoid fever Distribution of Typhoid Fever During the month of December 2015, typhoid cases were reported by nearly all districts. Central region reported the highest number, with Kampala, Wakiso, Mubende and Luweero contributing to the bulk of these numbers. In the north, high numbers were reported by Gulu, Arua and Koti- do. Cholera Outbreaks of cholera were also reported by several districts, across the country. 1 Visit our website www.whouganda.org and follow us on World Health Organization, Uganda @WHOUganda WHO UGANDA eHEALTH BULLETIN February 2016 Typhoid District Cholera Kisoro District 12 Fever Kitgum District 4 169 Abim District 43 Koboko District 26 Adjumani District 5 Kole District Agago District 26 85 Kotido District 347 Alebtong District 1 Kumi District 6 502 Amolatar District 58 Kween District 45 Amudat District 11 Kyankwanzi District
    [Show full text]
  • Livelihood Dynamics in Northern Karamoja
    LIVELIHOOD DYNAMICS IN NORTHERN KARAMOJA A Participatory Baseline Study for the Growth Health and Governance Program John Burns – Gezu Bekele – Darlington Akabwai May 2013 II Table of Contents SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Research Background and Overview .................................................................................... 4 1.2 Research Questions .............................................................................................................. 5 2. METHODS .................................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Study Overview ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Sampling ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Method and Size ............................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Data Collection Methods ....................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Pre-Testing ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Killing the Goose That Lays the Golden Egg
    KILLING THE GOOSE THAT LAYS THE GOLDEN EGG An Analysis of Budget Allocations and Revenue from the Environment and Natural Resource Sector in Karamoja Region Caroline Adoch Eugene Gerald Ssemakula ACODE Policy Research Series No.47, 2011 KILLING THE GOOSE THAT LAYS THE GOLDEN EGG An Analysis of Budget Allocations and Revenue from the Environment and Natural Resource Sector in Karamoja Region Caroline Adoch Eugene Gerald Ssemakula ACODE Policy Research Series No.47, 2011 Published by ACODE P. O. Box 29836, Kampala Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Website: http://www.acode-u.org Citation: Adoch, C., and Ssemakula, E., (2011). Killing the Goose that Lays the Golden Egg: An Analysis of Budget Allocations and Revenue from the Environment and Natural Resource Sector in Karamoja Region. ACODE Policy Research Series, No. 47, 2011. Kampala. © ACODE 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. ACODE policy work is supported by generous donations and grants from bilateral donors and charitable foundations. The reproduction or use of this publication for academic or charitable purposes or for purposes of informing public policy is excluded from this restriction. ISBN 978997007077 Contents LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................. v LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • KOTIDO District Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profile August 2014
    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA KARAMOJA KOTIDO District HAzArd, risk And VulnerAbility Profile August 2014 KOTIDO HAZARD, RISK AND VULNERABILITY PROFILE | i With support from: United Nations Development Programme Plot 11, Yusuf Lule Road P.O. Box 7184 Kampala, Uganda For more information: www.undp.org ii | KOTIDO HAZARD, RISK AND VULNERABILITY PROFILE Contents Acronyms.....................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgement........................................................................................................1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 3 Objectives...... .............................................................................................................3 Methodology ................................................................................................................3 Overview of the District ...............................................................................................6 Brief district history ..................................................................................................6 Location and administrative structure ......................................................................6 Ethnicity ....................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Kitgum District Hazard, Risk, and Vulnerability Profi Le
    Kitgum District Hazard, Risk, and Vulnerability Profi le 2016 Kitgum District Hazard, Risk, and Vulnerability Profi le i Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................. iv List of Tables ............................................................................................................... iv Acronyms.....................................................................................................................v Acknowledgment ........................................................................................................ vi Executive Summary................................................................................................... vii Defi nition of Terms ...................................................................................................... ix Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 Objectives ....................................................................................................................1 Methodology ................................................................................................................1 Overview of the District................................................................................................4 Location and Administration ........................................................................................4 Climate ........................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Status & Results
    The World Bank Report No: ISR13907 Implementation Status & Results Uganda Second Northern Uganda Social Action Fund Project (NUSAF2) (P111633) Operation Name: Second Northern Uganda Social Action Fund Project Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 8 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 03-May-2014 (NUSAF2) (P111633) Public Disclosure Authorized Country: Uganda Approval FY: 2009 Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: AFRICA Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Key Dates Public Disclosure Copy Board Approval Date 28-May-2009 Original Closing Date 31-Aug-2014 Planned Mid Term Review Date 30-Jan-2012 Last Archived ISR Date 19-Nov-2013 Effectiveness Date 25-Nov-2009 Revised Closing Date 31-Aug-2014 Actual Mid Term Review Date 14-Jun-2013 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) To improve access of beneficiary households in Northern Uganda to income earning opportunities and better basic socio-economic services. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Yes No Public Disclosure Authorized Component(s) Component Name Component Cost Livelihood Investment Support 60.00 Community Infrastructure Rehabilitation 30.00 Institutional Development 10.00 Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory Public Disclosure Authorized Overall Risk Rating Implementation Status Overview The NUSAF II project originally planned to finance 9750 (i.e. 8000 Household Income Support (HIS), 1000 Public Works (PW) and 750 Community Infrastructure Rehabilitation) sub projects in the five year of its implementation period. As of February 3, 2013 a total of 8,764 subprojects (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Electoral Commission
    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION Telephone: +256-41-337500/337508-11 Plot 55 Jinja Road Fax: +256-31-262207/41-337595/6 P. O. Box 22678 Kampala, Uganda E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ec.or.ug th Ref: ………………………………………Adm72/01 Date: ....9 ......................................... July 2019 Press Statement Programme for Elections of Interim Chairpersons in the Seven Newly-created Districts The Electoral Commission informs the general public that the following seven (7) newly- created districts came into effect on 1st July 2019: 1. Madi-Okollo District, which has been created out of Arua District; 2. Karenga District, which has been created out of Kaabong District; 3. Kalaki District, which has been created out of Kaberamaido District; 4. Kitagwenda District, which has been created out of Kamwenge District; 5. Kazo District, which has been created out of Kiruhura District; 6. Rwampara District, which has been created out of Mbarara District; and, 7. Obongi District, which has been created out of Moyo District. Accordingly, the Electoral Commission has appointed Thursday, 25th July, 2019 as the polling day for Elections of Interim District Chairperson in the above seven newly- created districts. Voting shall be by Electoral College and secret ballot and will be conducted at the headquarters of the respective new district, starting at 9:00am. The Electoral College shall comprise District Directly Elected Councillors and District Women Councillors representing the electoral areas forming the new districts. Please note that the elections of District Woman Representative to Parliament in the above newly-created districts will be conducted in due course.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Security & Livelihoods Assessment Kaabong & Moroto, Karamoja August – September 2008
    September 2008 Updated Version May 2009 Food Security & Livelihoods Assessment Kaabong & Moroto, Karamoja August – September 2008 CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND ................................................................................ 9 2. OBJECTIVES & METHODOLOGY ......................................................... 11 2.1 Location ................................................................................. 11 2.2 Data Collection Methods .............................................................. 12 2.3 Data Analysis ............................................................................ 13 3. ANALYSIS .................................................................................... 13 3.1 Livelihood Systems ..................................................................... 13 3.2 Livestock Production .................................................................. 16 3.3 Crop Production ........................................................................ 19 3.4 Markets .................................................................................. 21 3.5 Wealth Groups .......................................................................... 23 3.6 Changes in Household Food Sources ................................................ 24 3.7 Changes in Household Income Sources ............................................. 25 3.8 Changes in Household Expenditure .................................................. 26 3.9 Changes in Household Coping Strategies ........................................... 27 4. CONCLUSIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Kampala, Uganda; Telephone: (256-414) 7060000 Fax: (256-414) 237553/230370; E-Mail: [email protected]; Website
    2014 NPHC - Main Report National Population and Housing Census 2014 Main Report 2014 NPHC - Main Report This report presents findings from the National Population and Housing Census 2014 undertaken by the Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS). Additional information about the Census may be obtained from the Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS), Plot 9 Colville Street, P.O. box 7186 Kampala, Uganda; Telephone: (256-414) 7060000 Fax: (256-414) 237553/230370; E-mail: [email protected]; Website: www.ubos.org. Cover Photos: Uganda Bureau of Statistics Recommended Citation Uganda Bureau of Statistics 2016, The National Population and Housing Census 2014 – Main Report, Kampala, Uganda 2014 NPHC - Main Report FOREWORD Demographic and socio-economic data are The Bureau would also like to thank the useful for planning and evidence-based Media for creating awareness about the decision making in any country. Such data Census 2014 and most importantly the are collected through Population Censuses, individuals who were respondents to the Demographic and Socio-economic Surveys, Census questions. Civil Registration Systems and other The census provides several statistics Administrative sources. In Uganda, however, among them a total population count which the Population and Housing Census remains is a denominator and key indicator used for the main source of demographic data. resource allocation, measurement of the extent of service delivery, decision making Uganda has undertaken five population and budgeting among others. These Final Censuses in the post-independence period. Results contain information about the basic The most recent, the National Population characteristics of the population and the and Housing Census 2014 was undertaken dwellings they live in.
    [Show full text]