DOCSLIB.ORG

Pilot and Kotido District Development Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ministry of Local Government Republic of Uganda United Nations Capital Development Fund United Nations Development Programme District Development Project – Pilot and Kotido District Development Project Mid-Term Evaluation January – February 2001 Final Report PROJECT DATA SHEET COUNTRY: UGANDA FULL PROJECT NUMBERS: UGA/95/C01, UGA/97/008, & UGA/96/C01, UGA/98/005 PROJECT TITLE: DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT – PILOT, & KOTIDO DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PROJECT SECTOR: DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES, POLICIES & PLANNING (0210) SUB-SECTOR: LOCAL GOVERNANCE EXECUTING AGENCY: MINISTRY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES: LOCAL GOVERNMENTS OF ARUA, JINJA, KABALE, MUKONO & KOTIDO FUNDING AGENCIES: UNCDF, UNDP & GoU PROJECT COSTS: UNCDF US $ 12,273,520 (UGA/95/C01) US $ 2,693,493 (UGA/96/C01) UNDP US $ 2,048,445 (UGA/97/008) US $ 500,000 (UGA/98/005) GoU US $ 242,397 (UGA/96/C01; UGA/98/005) PROJECT APPROVAL DATES: July 1997 (UGA/95/C01, UGA/97/008), October 1997 (UGA/96/C01, UGA/98/005) PROJECT START DATES: July 1998 (UGA/95/C01, UGA/97/008 & UGA/96/C01, UGA/98/005) PROJECT COMPLETION DATES: June 2001 (UGA/95/C01, UGA/97/008) June 2002 (UGA/96/C01, UGA/98/005) EVALUATION DATE: JANUARY – FEBRUARY 2001 Page 1 of 159 Acknowledgements The Team is grateful to a number of people whose support made the preparation of this report possible. We wish to acknowledge the support and understanding of the UNDP Country Representative, Mr. Daouda Toure, and his deputy, Dr. Dan Temu, during the course of our work. Other senior staff of UNCDF and UNDP in Kampala also provided useful information. UNCDF Country Office provided us with relevant literature as well as logistical support. We would also like to thank the Ministry of Local Government, and in particular the Decentralisation Secretariat/ Project Management Unit, especially Mr. Mugabi (Director, DS) and Mr Onyach-Olaa (Co-ordinator, PMU), who provided us with detailed information about decentralisation in Uganda in general and the DDP/KDDP in particular. We would also like to thank the dedicated staff of PMU who responded to our requests for data regardless of the time and day of the week and also accompanied us to all the districts we visited. The Team is also thankful to the representatives of Uganda’s development partners, whose names appear elsewhere in this report, for their frank discussion of their organisations’ policies and how these relate to the development policies of the country. These discussions enabled us to see the project within the wider donor perspective of Uganda’s development in the context of decentralisation. We are thankful to all the participants of the two consultative meetings held in Kampala, one at the beginning of the Mission and the other at the end of the Mission. While in the field, we also received the full co-operation of district and sub-county political executives as well as their technical staff. Their frank discussions of the issues related to the project and readiness to allow us access to relevant documents enabled us to gain clearer perspectives of the performance of the Project on the ground. At the project level, the Project Management Committees that we talked to at various sites were more than prepared to give us the information we needed. And when the draft report was ready, the Team benefited from the constructive discussions that were held during the debriefing meeting at UNCDF Headquarters, New York. Subsequently, comments from UNCDF Technical Advisors (Local Government Unit), UNCDF Evaluation Unit, UNCDF Country Office, MoLG, Mukono District, and Mrs. R .P. Tumusiime (Commissioner for Agricultural Planning) were of great benefit in producing the final report. The Team alone takes the responsibility for the contents of this Final Report and any other weaknesses that may still remain herein. Finally, the Team is grateful to the Government of Uganda and the Project donors, namely UNCDF and UNDP, for having given us the opportunity to serve on the Mission. Page 2 of 159 Abbreviations and Acronyms CAO Chief Administrative Officer CBF Capacity Building Fund CBO Community Based Organisation CDRN Community Development Research Network CG Conditional Grant CoU Church of Uganda Danida Danish International Development Assistance DDP District Development Project DfID Department for International Development DMU Dispensary Maternity Unit DPU District Planning Unit DS Decentralisation Secretariat DTB District Tender Board FaAR/ LGFaAR Local Government Financial and Accounting Regulations FY Fiscal Year GAD Gender and Development GoU Government of Uganda GPT Graduated Personal Tax HoDs Heads of Departments HQs Headquarters IC Investment Committee IDA International Development Association IPFs Indicative Planning Figures KDDP Kotido District Development Project LCs Local Councils LC1 Local Council level 1 (Village Council) LC2 Local Council level 2 (Parish Council) LC3 Local Council level 3 (Sub-county Council) LC5 Local Council level 5 (District Council) LDF Local Development Fund LG Local Government LGDP Local Government Development Programme LGFC Local Government Finance Commission M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MCs & PMs Minimum Conditions and Performance Measures MGLSD Ministry of Gender, Labour and Social Development MISR Makerere Institute of Social Research MoFPED Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development MoLG Ministry of Local Government NGOs Non-Governmental Organisations NRM National Resistance Movement O&M Operations and Maintenance Page 3 of 159 PAF Poverty Action Fund PAIMS Planning, Allocation and Investment Management System PEAP Poverty Eradication Action Plan PMA Plan for Modernisation of Agriculture PMC Project Management Committee PMU Programme Management Unit (MoLG) PPAs Priority Programme Areas PS Permanent Secretary PSC Policy Steering Committee PTA Parents Teachers’ Association PTC Project Technical Committee PUIP Peri-Urban Infrastructure Project PDWs Poor Disadvantaged and Widows SMC School Management Committee SWAP Sector-Wide Approach UBN Unsatisfied Basic Needs ULAA Uganda Local Authorities Association UNABCEC Uganda National Association of Building and Civil Engineering Contractors UNCDF United Nations Capital Development Fund UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNFPA United Nations Fund for Population Activities UPE Universal Primary Education UPPAP Uganda Participatory Poverty Assessment Project USAID United States Agency for International Development Ushs. Uganda Shillings WB World Bank (The) WID Women in Development Page 4 of 159 INTRODUCTION TO THE EVALUATION REPORT This report is submitted to UNDP/UNCDF and the Government of Uganda as one of the outputs required by the Terms of Reference for the Evaluation Team carrying out the Mid Term Evaluation (MTE) on the District Development Project-Pilot (DDP-Pilot) and Kotido District Development Project (KDDP). The broad objectives of the evaluation, which guided the work of the Team, are set out in part 1 of the T.O.R., on page 2, quoted here below: 1. Assess the overall progress (or lack thereof) and detect early signs of success or failure; 2. Assess the initial project design and project relevance to the current situation; 3. Establish the likely impact of the DDP/KDDP on vulnerable and marginalised groups such as the internally displaced and persons with disabilities; 4. Examine the impact of DDP design/ objectives and mode of operation on on-going policy debate on and implementation of such initiatives as Universal Primary Education, Plan for Modernisation of Agriculture, Water and National Sanitation Strategy, etc. 5. Assess sustainability of implemented activities and/or exit strategies; 6. Assess the monitoring and evaluation system (including review and comparison of Project Performance Indicators, i.e. the SRFs and KPIs); 7. Set the course for the remaining duration, including the one year extension of the project; 8. Draw initial lessons learnt about project design, implementation and management. The four-member Evaluation Team was made up of two international and two national consultants, viz.: • Prof. Walter O. Oyugi (Team Leader): The Decentralisation Policy and Institutional Change Expert (University of Nairobi, Kenya); • Ms. Monica Ramirez: Poverty and Participation Expert (Consultant, Bogota, Colombia); • Mrs. Elizabeth Eilor: Gender Expert (Eastern Africa Sub-Regional Support Initiative for the Advancement of Women, Kampala, Uganda); and • Eng. Patrick Batumbya: Infrastructure Specialist (MBW Consulting Engineers, Kampala, Uganda). The Team assembled in Kampala on 14th January, and held its first briefing meeting with UNDP and UNCDF senior staff on 15th January. During its first week in the country, the team held meetings with government officials in Kampala and also met a cross-section of Uganda’s development partners based in Kampala. In between these meetings, the Team worked on the Inception Report – the instrument that guided the activities of the mission for the rest of the duration of their stay in the country. Between 22nd January and 14th February the Team moved in and out of Kampala to all the five project districts, viz. Kabale, Mukono, Jinja, Arua and Kotido. While in the districts, the Team held meetings with both the political and administrative leaders who are members of the District Executive Committee and District Technical Committee respectively. These meetings were followed with more focused person-to-person interviews with individual heads of departments/directorates. While in the districts, the Team also visited selected
Recommended publications
  • Buikwe District Economic Profile

    Buikwe District Economic Profile

    BUIKWE DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT P.O.BOX 3, LUGAZI District LED Profile A. Map of Buikwe District Showing LLGs N 1 B. Background 1.1 Location and Size Buikwe District lies in the Central region of Uganda, sharing borders with the District of Jinja in the East, Kayunga along river Sezibwa in the North, Mukono in the West, and Buvuma in Lake Victoria. The District Headquarters is in BUIKWE Town, situated along Kampala - Jinja road (11kms off Lugazi). Buikwe Town serves as an Administrative and commercial centre. Other urban centers include Lugazi, Njeru and Nkokonjeru Town Councils. Buikwe District has a total area of about 1209 Square Kilometres of which land area is 1209 square km. 1.2 Historical Background Buikwe District is one of the 28 districts of Uganda that were created under the local Government Act 1 of 1997. By the act of parliament, the district was inniatially one of the Counties of Mukono district but later declared an independent district in July 2009. The current Buikwe district consists of One County which is divided into three constituencies namely Buikwe North, Buikwe South and Buikwe West. It conatins 8 sub counties and 4 Town councils. 1.3 Geographical Features Topography The northern part of the district is flat but the southern region consists of sloping land with great many undulations; 75% of the land is less than 60o in slope. Most of Buikwe District lies on a high plateau (1000-1300) above sea level with some areas along Sezibwa River below 760m above sea level, Southern Buikwe is a raised plateau (1220-2440m) drained by River Sezibwa and River Musamya.
  • Uganda 2015 Human Rights Report

    Uganda 2015 Human Rights Report

    UGANDA 2015 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Uganda is a constitutional republic led since 1986 by President Yoweri Museveni of the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM) party. Voters re-elected Museveni to a fourth five-year term and returned an NRM majority to the unicameral Parliament in 2011. While the election marked an improvement over previous elections, it was marred by irregularities. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control over the security forces. The three most serious human rights problems in the country included: lack of respect for the integrity of the person (unlawful killings, torture, and other abuse of suspects and detainees); restrictions on civil liberties (freedoms of assembly, expression, the media, and association); and violence and discrimination against marginalized groups, such as women (sexual and gender-based violence), children (sexual abuse and ritual killing), persons with disabilities, and the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) community. Other human rights problems included harsh prison conditions, arbitrary and politically motivated arrest and detention, lengthy pretrial detention, restrictions on the right to a fair trial, official corruption, societal or mob violence, trafficking in persons, and child labor. Although the government occasionally took steps to punish officials who committed abuses, whether in the security services or elsewhere, impunity was a problem. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life There were several reports the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings. On September 8, media reported security forces in Apaa Parish in the north shot and killed five persons during a land dispute over the government’s border demarcation.
  • Karamoja and Northern Uganda Comparative Analysis of Livelihood Recovery in the Post-Conflict Periods November 2019

    Karamoja and Northern Uganda Comparative Analysis of Livelihood Recovery in the Post-Conflict Periods November 2019

    Karamoja and Northern Uganda Comparative analysis of livelihood recovery in the post-conflict periods November 2019 Karamoja and Northern Uganda Comparative analysis of livelihood recovery in the post-conflict periods November 2019 Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Tufts University Rome, 2019 REQUIRED CITATION FAO and Tufts University. 2019. Comparative analysis of livelihood recovery in the post-conflict periods – Karamoja and Northern Uganda. November 2019. Rome. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or Tufts University concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO or the University in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO or the University. ISBN 978-92-5-131747-1 (FAO) ©FAO and Tufts University, 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited.
  • Priority Service Provision Under Decentralization: a Case Study of Maternal and Child Health Care in Uganda

    Priority Service Provision Under Decentralization: a Case Study of Maternal and Child Health Care in Uganda

    Small Applied Research No. 10 Priority Service Provision under Decentralization: A Case Study of Maternal and Child Health Care in Uganda December 1999 Prepared by: Frederick Mwesigye, M.A Makerere University Abt Associates Inc. n 4800 Montgomery Lane, Suite 600 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 n Tel: 301/913-0500 n Fax: 301/652-3916 In collaboration with: Development Associates, Inc. n Harvard School of Public Health n Howard University International Affairs Center n University Research Co., LLC Funded by: U.S. Agency for International Development Mission The Partnerships for Health Reform (PHR) Project seeks to improve people’s health in low- and middle-income countries by supporting health sector reforms that ensure equitable access to efficient, sustainable, quality health care services. In partnership with local stakeholders, PHR promotes an integrated approach to health reform and builds capacity in the following key areas: > Better informed and more participatory policy processes in health sector reform; > More equitable and sustainable health financing systems; > Improved incentives within health systems to encourage agents to use and deliver efficient and quality health services; and > Enhanced organization and management of health care systems and institutions to support specific health sector reforms. PHR advances knowledge and methodologies to develop, implement, and monitor health reforms and their impact, and promotes the exchange of information on critical health reform issues. December 1999 Recommended Citation Mwesigye, Frederick. 1999. Priority Service Provision Under Decentralization: A Case Study of Maternal and Child Health Care in Uganda. Small Applied Research Paper No. 10. Bethesda, MD: Partnerships for Health Reform Project, Abt Associates Inc. For additional copies of this report, contact the PHR Resource Center at [email protected] or visit our website at www.phrproject.com.
  • Uganda Humanitarian Update

    Uganda Humanitarian Update

    UGANDA HUMANITARIAN UPDATE MAY – JUNE 2010 I. HIGHLIGHTS AMID HEAVY RAINS, HUMANITARIAN ACCESS IN PARTS OF KARAMOJA AND TESO HAMPERED BY DETERIORATING ROAD CONDITIONS OVER 1,000 CHOLERA CASES REGISTERED IN KARAMOJA SINCE APRIL 2010 90% OF IDPS IN NORTHERN UGANDA NO LONGER LIVING IN CAMPS, BUT LAND CONFLICTS AND LANDMINES IMPEDING RETURN IN SOME AREAS II. SECURITY AND ACCESS SECURITY The general situation in Karamoja remained fragile, according to the United Nations Department for Safety and Security (UNDSS). Cattle raids, including on protected kraals, particularly affected Moroto and Kotido, with some resulting in fierce clashes between the Uganda People’s Defence Forces and the raiders. In South Karamoja incidents associated with food distributions involved theft of food and non-food items (NFIs), and attacks on food distributors as well as on food recipients. Following three road ambushes in Alerek sub-county of Abim District during the month, UNDSS issued an advisory limiting UN movement along the Abim-Kotido road to between 09.00Hrs and 16.00Hrs with effect from 28 June 2010. Three civilians were killed in one of those ambushes. In northern Uganda, Amuru District officials and partners carried out a joint assessment in the wake of a violent land dispute that occurred in Koli village of Pabbo sub-county on 23 June. Preliminary findings indicated that one person was killed and several others injured in the dispute involving two clans. Some 40 huts were torched and many members of either clan had fled the village. Also of concern in the region during the reporting period were raids by illegally armed Karamojong, particularly in Pader District.
  • E464 Volume I1;Wj9,GALIPROJECT 4 TOMANSMISSIONSYSTEM

    E464 Volume I1;Wj9,GALIPROJECT 4 TOMANSMISSIONSYSTEM

    E464 Volume i1;Wj9,GALIPROJECT 4 TOMANSMISSIONSYSTEM Public Disclosure Authorized Preparedfor: UGANDA A3 NILE its POWER Richmond;UK Public Disclosure Authorized Fw~~~~I \ If~t;o ,.-, I~~~~~~~ jt .4 ,. 't' . .~ Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared by: t~ IN),I "%4fr - - tt ?/^ ^ ,s ENVIRONMENTAL 111teinlauloln.al IMPACT i-S(. Illf STATEME- , '. vi (aietlph,t:an,.daw,,, -\S_,,y '\ /., 'cf - , X £/XL March, 2001 - - ' Public Disclosure Authorized _, ,;' m.. .'ILE COPY I U Technical Resettlement Technical Resettlement Appendices and A e i ActionPlan ,Community ApenicsAcinPla Dlevelopment (A' Action Plan (RCDAP') The compilete Bujagali Project EIA consists of 7 documents Note: Thetransmission system documentation is,for the most part, the same as fhat submittedto ihe Ugandcn National EnvironmentalManagement Authority(NEMAI in December 2000. Detailsof the changes made to the documentation betwoon Dccomber 2000 and the presentsubmission aro avoiloblo from AESN P. Only the graphics that have been changed since December, 2000 hove new dates. FILE: DOChUME[NTC ,ART.CD I 3 fOOt'ypnIp, .asod 1!A/SJV L6'.'''''' '' '.' epurf Ut tUISWXS XillJupllD 2UI1SIXg Itb L6 ... NOJIDSaS1J I2EIof (INY SISAlVNV S2IAIlVNTIuaJ bV _ b6.sanl1A Puu O...tp.s.. ZA .6san1r^A pue SD)flSUIa1DJltJJ WemlrnIn S- (7)6. .. .--D)qqnd llH S bf 68 ..............................................................--- - -- io ---QAu ( laimpod u2Vl b,-£ 6L ...................................... -SWulaue lu;DwIa:43Spuel QSI-PUU'l Z btl' 6L .............................................----- * -* -SaULepunog QAfjP.4SlUTtUPad l SL. sUOItllpuo ltUiOUOZg-OioOS V£ ££.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~A2~~~~~~~~~3V s z')J -4IOfJIrN 'Et (OAIOsOa.. Isoa0 joJxxNsU uAWom osILr) 2AX)SO> IsaIo4 TO•LWN ZU£N 9s ... suotll puoD [eOT20olla E SS '' ''''''''..........''...''................................. slotNluolqur wZ S5 ' '' '' '' ' '' '' '' - - - -- -........................- puiN Z'Z'£ j7i.. .U.13 1uu7EF ...................
  • Medicines Consumer Awareness Campaign Project Report

    Medicines Consumer Awareness Campaign Project Report

    MEDICINES CONSUMER AWARENESS CAMPAIGN PROJECT REPORT 2017 This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of Cardno Emerging Markets USA, Ltd. and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. CONSUMER AWARENESS CAMPAIGN PROJECT REPORT Authors: Coalition for Health Promotion and Social Development (HEPS Uganda) Submitted by: Cardno Emerging Markets USA, Ltd. Submitted to: USAID/Uganda Contract No.: AID-617-C-13-00005 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Consumer Awareness Campaign Project Report 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATION........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 1. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Introduction
  • Karamoja Rapid Crop and Food Security Assessment

    Karamoja Rapid Crop and Food Security Assessment

    KARAMOJA RAPID CROP AND FOOD SECURITY ASSESSMENT KAMPALA, AUGUST 2013 This Rapid Assessment was conducted by: World Food Programme (WFP) - Elliot Vhurumuku; Hamidu Tusiime; Eunice Twanza; Alex Ogenrwoth; Swaleh Gule; James Odong; and Joseph Ndawula Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) - Bernard Onzima; Joseph Egabu; Paddy Namurebire; and Michael Lokiru Office of the Prime Minister (OPM) - Johnson Oworo; Timothy Ojwi; Jimmy Ogwang; and Catherine Nakalembe Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries (MAAIF) - James Obo; and Stephen Kataama Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 2 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Background .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2. Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3. Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1. Sampling methodology .................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2. Selection of respondents ................................................................................................
  • Rcdf Projects in Jinja District, Uganda

    Rcdf Projects in Jinja District, Uganda

    Rural Communications Development Fund (RCDF) RCDF PROJECTS IN JINJA DISTRICT, UGANDA MAP O F JINJA DIS TR ICT S HO W ING S UB CO U NTIES N B uw enge T C B uy engo B uta gaya B uw enge Bus ed de B udon do K ak ira Mafubira Mpum udd e/ K im ak a Masese/ Ce ntral wa lukub a Div ision 20 0 20 40 Kms UCC Support through the RCDF Programme Uganda Communications Commission Plot 42 -44, Spring road, Bugolobi P.O. Box 7376 Kampala, Uganda Tel: + 256 414 339000/ 312 339000 Fax: + 256 414 348832 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ucc.co.ug 1 Table of Contents 1- Foreword……………………………………………………………….……….………..…..…....………3 2- Background…………………………………….………………………..…………..….….……..………4 3- Introduction………………….……………………………………..…….…………….….……….…...4 4- Project profiles……………………………………………………………………….…..…….……....5 5- Stakeholders’ responsibilities………………………………………………….….…........…12 6- Contacts………………..…………………………………………….…………………..…….……….13 List of tables and maps 1- Table showing number of RCDF projects in Jinja district………………l….…….….5 2- Map of Uganda showing Jinja district………..………………….………………....…….14 10- Map of Jinja district showing sub counties………..…………………………………..15 11- Table showing the population of Jinja district by sub counties……………….15 12- List of RCDF Projects in Jinja District…………………………………….………..…..…16 Abbreviations/Acronyms UCC Uganda Communications Commission RCDF Rural Communications Development Fund USF Universal Service Fund MCT Multipurpose Community Tele-centre PPDA Public Procurement and Disposal Act of 2003 POP Internet Points of Presence ICT Information and Communications Technology UA Universal Access MoES Ministry of Education and Sports MoH Ministry of Health DHO District Health Officer CAO Chief Administrative Officer RDC Resident District Commissioner 2 1. Foreword ICTs are a key factor for socio-economic development.
  • WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 Ehealth MONTHLY BULLETIN

    WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 Ehealth MONTHLY BULLETIN

    WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 eHEALTH MONTHLY BULLETIN Welcome to this 1st issue of the eHealth Bulletin, a production 2015 of the WHO Country Office. Disease October November December This monthly bulletin is intended to bridge the gap between the Cholera existing weekly and quarterly bulletins; focus on a one or two disease/event that featured prominently in a given month; pro- Typhoid fever mote data utilization and information sharing. Malaria This issue focuses on cholera, typhoid and malaria during the Source: Health Facility Outpatient Monthly Reports, Month of December 2015. Completeness of monthly reporting DHIS2, MoH for December 2015 was above 90% across all the four regions. Typhoid fever Distribution of Typhoid Fever During the month of December 2015, typhoid cases were reported by nearly all districts. Central region reported the highest number, with Kampala, Wakiso, Mubende and Luweero contributing to the bulk of these numbers. In the north, high numbers were reported by Gulu, Arua and Koti- do. Cholera Outbreaks of cholera were also reported by several districts, across the country. 1 Visit our website www.whouganda.org and follow us on World Health Organization, Uganda @WHOUganda WHO UGANDA eHEALTH BULLETIN February 2016 Typhoid District Cholera Kisoro District 12 Fever Kitgum District 4 169 Abim District 43 Koboko District 26 Adjumani District 5 Kole District Agago District 26 85 Kotido District 347 Alebtong District 1 Kumi District 6 502 Amolatar District 58 Kween District 45 Amudat District 11 Kyankwanzi District
  • Livelihood Dynamics in Northern Karamoja

    Livelihood Dynamics in Northern Karamoja

    LIVELIHOOD DYNAMICS IN NORTHERN KARAMOJA A Participatory Baseline Study for the Growth Health and Governance Program John Burns – Gezu Bekele – Darlington Akabwai May 2013 II Table of Contents SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Research Background and Overview .................................................................................... 4 1.2 Research Questions .............................................................................................................. 5 2. METHODS .................................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Study Overview ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Sampling ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Method and Size ............................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Data Collection Methods ....................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Pre-Testing ...........................................................................................................................
  • Jinja District Local Government Councils' Scorecard FY 2018/19

    Jinja District Local Government Councils' Scorecard FY 2018/19

    jinja DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT council SCORECARD assessment FY 2018/19 jinja DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT council SCORECARD assessment FY 2018/19 L-R: Ms. Rose Gamwera, Secretary General ULGA; Mr. Ben Kumumanya, PS. MoLG and Dr. Arthur Bainomugisha, Executive Director ACODE in a group photo with award winners at the launch of the 8th Local Government Councils Scorecard Report FY 2018/19 at Hotel Africana in Kampala on 10th March 2020 1.0 Introduction 1.2 The Local Government Councils Scorecard Initiative (LGCSCI) This brief was developed from the scorecard report The main building blocks in LGCSCI are the principles titled, “The Local Government Councils Scorecard and core responsibilities of Local Governments FY 2018/19. “The Next Big Steps: Consolidating as set out in Chapter 11 of the Constitution of the Gains of Decentralisation and Repositioning the Republic of Uganda, the Local Governments Act Local Government Sector in Uganda.” The brief (CAP 243) under Section 10 (c), (d) and (e). The provides key highlights of the performance of district scorecard comprises of five parameters based on elected leaders and the Council of Jinja District the core responsibilities of the local government Local Government (JDLG) during FY 2018/19. Councils, District Chairpersons, Speakers and 1.1 About the District Individual Councillors. These are classified into five categories: Financial management and oversight; Jinja District is located approximately 87 kilometres Political functions and representation; Legislation by road, east of Kampala, comprising one of the nine and related functions; Development planning and (9) districts of Busoga region with its Headquarters constituency servicing and Monitoring service located at Busoga Square within Jinja Municipality.