1922 Annual Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Abolition of the Upper House Community Engagement – Updated 27 March 2001
Abolition of the Upper House Community Engagement – Updated 27 March 2001 THE ABOLITION OF THE UPPER HOUSE IN QUEENSLAND INTRODUCTION Unicameral legislatures, or legislatures with only one chamber, are uncommon in democracies. It is usually considered that two chambers are necessary for government, and this is the case for the United Kingdom, Canada (at the Federal level) and the United States (Federally, and for all states except Nebraska.) However, some countries, usually small ones, are unicameral. Israel, Denmark, Finland, Luxembourg, Sweden, and Greece have only one chamber. All the Canadian Provinces, all the Malaysian States and some of the Indian ones, including Assam, are unicameral. Other single-chambered legislatures in the Commonwealth include New Zealand, Ghana, Cyprus, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Uganda, Malta, Malawi, Zambia, Gambia, Guyana, Singapore, Botswana, Zimbabwe and (Western) Samoa. In Australia, the Federal Government has two chambers, as do the governments of all the states, except Queensland. At its separation from New South Wales in 1859, Queensland had two houses of Parliament, the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council. But in a move unique in Australian history, the Legislative Council abolished itself. EARLY DAYS OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL, 1860-1890 Queensland, separated from New South Wales in 1859, was the only colony to have a Parliament from its inception. When the Parliament of Queensland was first promulgated in 1860, there were two houses of Parliament. The first members of the Upper House, the Legislative Council, were appointed for five years by the Governor of New South Wales, so that Queensland would not be left permanently with nominees from the Governor of another colony. -
Healthy Waterways-2015 Social Science Research Report
This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Johnston, Kim& Beatson, Amanda (2015) Healthy waterways - 2015 Social Science Research Report. Queensland University of Technology, Business School, Australia. This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/93606/ c Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu- ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog- nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 2.5 Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record (i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub- mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) can be identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear- ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source. https://doi.org/10.5204/rep.eprints.93606 1 SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH FINAL REPORT AUGUST 2015 Prepared by Dr Kim Johnston and Dr Amanda Beatson QUT Business School Queensland University of Technology doi: 10.5204/rep.eprints.93606 © The Author(s). -
Queensland Transport and Roads Investment Program (QTRIP) 2016
Metropolitan Metropolitan | Map and Contact Details Brisbane office 313 Adelaide Street | Brisbane | Qld 4000 PO Box 70 | Spring Hill | Qld 4004 (07) 3066 5499 | [email protected] Divider Image: Moggill Road Cycle Bridge looking north east towards Brisbane central business district (bridge spans Moggill Road, Indooroopilly). Copyright © 2015 Department of Transport and Main Roads, the Queensland Government. Department of Transport and Main Roads Metropolitan Overview • A two-lane bus-only extension road from Warrigal Road • Commence intersection improvements on Mount Crosby through to Logan Road in Eight Mile Plains. Road, at the Delacy Street and Pine Street intersection. The Metropolitan District covers an area of about 2,968km2, or around 0.2% of Queensland1. It straddles the Brisbane In 2016-17 we will: • Continue to seek Australian Government funding River and extends from Mount Glorious in the north to Logan for the Pacific Motorway-Gateway Motorway merge City in the south, and from Point Lookout in the east to west • Continue construction of the Gateway Upgrade North upgrade (southbound lanes), with $42 million provided of Helidon and the major centre of Ipswich. project that will widen the Gateway Motorway to towards this $210 million project by the Queensland six lanes, between Nudgee and Bracken Ridge, jointly Government as part of the State Infrastructure Fund. The district has an estimated residential population of funded by the Australian Government and Queensland about 1,461,733 or around 31.4% of Queensland’s total Government. population1. Future plans • Commence the Ipswich Motorway (Rocklea to Darra) The district looks after about 414km of other state-controlled Stage 1 project, to construct additional lanes between We are continuing to plan for the future transport roads, about 112km of the National Land Transport Network, Oxley Road and Suscatand Street, jointly funded by the requirements of residents in the Metropolitan District. -
Local Heritage Register
Explanatory Notes for Development Assessment Local Heritage Register Amendments to the Queensland Heritage Act 1992, Schedule 8 and 8A of the Integrated Planning Act 1997, the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998, and the Queensland Heritage Regulation 2003 became effective on 31 March 2008. All aspects of development on a Local Heritage Place in a Local Heritage Register under the Queensland Heritage Act 1992, are code assessable (unless City Plan 2000 requires impact assessment). Those code assessable applications are assessed against the Code in Schedule 2 of the Queensland Heritage Regulation 2003 and the Heritage Place Code in City Plan 2000. City Plan 2000 makes some aspects of development impact assessable on the site of a Heritage Place and a Heritage Precinct. Heritage Places and Heritage Precincts are identified in the Heritage Register of the Heritage Register Planning Scheme Policy in City Plan 2000. Those impact assessable applications are assessed under the relevant provisions of the City Plan 2000. All aspects of development on land adjoining a Heritage Place or Heritage Precinct are assessable solely under City Plan 2000. ********** For building work on a Local Heritage Place assessable against the Building Act 1975, the Local Government is a concurrence agency. ********** Amendments to the Local Heritage Register are located at the back of the Register. G:\C_P\Heritage\Legal Issues\Amendments to Heritage legislation\20080512 Draft Explanatory Document.doc LOCAL HERITAGE REGISTER (for Section 113 of the Queensland Heritage -
Urban Forms and the Politics of Property in Colonial Hong Kong By
Speculative Modern: Urban Forms and the Politics of Property in Colonial Hong Kong by Cecilia Louise Chu A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Nezar AlSayyad, Chair Professor C. Greig Crysler Professor Eugene F. Irschick Spring 2012 Speculative Modern: Urban Forms and the Politics of Property in Colonial Hong Kong Copyright 2012 by Cecilia Louise Chu 1 Abstract Speculative Modern: Urban Forms and the Politics of Property in Colonial Hong Kong Cecilia Louise Chu Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture University of California, Berkeley Professor Nezar AlSayyad, Chair This dissertation traces the genealogy of property development and emergence of an urban milieu in Hong Kong between the 1870s and mid 1930s. This is a period that saw the transition of colonial rule from one that relied heavily on coercion to one that was increasingly “civil,” in the sense that a growing number of native Chinese came to willingly abide by, if not whole-heartedly accept, the rules and regulations of the colonial state whilst becoming more assertive in exercising their rights under the rule of law. Long hailed for its laissez-faire credentials and market freedom, Hong Kong offers a unique context to study what I call “speculative urbanism,” wherein the colonial government’s heavy reliance on generating revenue from private property supported a lucrative housing market that enriched a large number of native property owners. Although resenting the discrimination they encountered in the colonial territory, they were able to accumulate economic and social capital by working within and around the colonial regulatory system. -
Inner Brisbane Heritage Walk/Drive Booklet
Engineering Heritage Inner Brisbane A Walk / Drive Tour Engineers Australia Queensland Division National Library of Australia Cataloguing- in-Publication entry Title: Engineering heritage inner Brisbane: a walk / drive tour / Engineering Heritage Queensland. Edition: Revised second edition. ISBN: 9780646561684 (paperback) Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Brisbane (Qld.)--Guidebooks. Brisbane (Qld.)--Buildings, structures, etc.--Guidebooks. Brisbane (Qld.)--History. Other Creators/Contributors: Engineers Australia. Queensland Division. Dewey Number: 919.43104 Revised and reprinted 2015 Chelmer Office Services 5/10 Central Avenue Graceville Q 4075 Disclaimer: The information in this publication has been created with all due care, however no warranty is given that this publication is free from error or omission or that the information is the most up-to-date available. In addition, the publication contains references and links to other publications and web sites over which Engineers Australia has no responsibility or control. You should rely on your own enquiries as to the correctness of the contents of the publication or of any of the references and links. Accordingly Engineers Australia and its servants and agents expressly disclaim liability for any act done or omission made on the information contained in the publication and any consequences of any such act or omission. Acknowledgements Engineers Australia, Queensland Division acknowledged the input to the first edition of this publication in 2001 by historical archaeologist Kay Brown for research and text development, historian Heather Harper of the Brisbane City Council Heritage Unit for patience and assistance particularly with the map, the Brisbane City Council for its generous local history grant and for access to and use of its BIMAP facility, the Queensland Maritime Museum Association, the Queensland Museum and the John Oxley Library for permission to reproduce the photographs, and to the late Robin Black and Robyn Black for loan of the pen and ink drawing of the coal wharf. -
Augustine Birrell, Chief Secretary for Ireland, 1907-1916
3.0 Those who Set the Stage 3.1 Those concerned with Home Rule (for and against) 3.1.2 Augustine Birrell, Chief Secretary for Ireland, 1907-1916 Birrell contributed indirectly to the Rising by failing (together with Asquith) to confront the Ulster unionists and by failing to take action against the republicans planning the Rising. Augustine Birrell (1850-1933) was from Liverpool. His father was a Baptist minister and his maternal grandfather a Free Church of Scotland minister; in later life he became an agnostic, but maintained a Liberal nonconformist outlook. A legacy enabled him to study law at Trinity Hall, Cambridge, following which he practiced as a barrister and gained recognition as an essayist and literary critic of distinction. Elected as the Liberal MP for West Fife in 1889, he served as a minister under Campbell-Bannerman, becoming Chief Secretary for Ireland in 1907, an office which he held until May 1916 when he resigned under a cloud in the aftermath of the Rising. The Chief Secretary was the official responsible for formulating and administering government policy in Ireland. Birrell was one of the most humane, committed and productive ministers ever to hold the office. He was well disposed towards nationalist Ireland, his ultimate objective being Home Rule. In the meantime, he had a total of fifty-six pieces of largely beneficial legislation enacted. These included acts for the establishment of the National University of Ireland and Queen’s University Belfast, and the 1909 Land Act, which accelerated the purchase of land by tenants and reduced agrarian strife. -
The Governor of Queensland
Factsheet 2.2 The Governor of Queensland Role of the Governor • recommending by a message to the Legislative Assembly, the passing of the Appropriation Queensland’s system of Government is a Bill(s) prior to their introduction in the House; constitutional monarchy. The Queensland Constitution Acts specifically recognise • having the discretionary powers concerning that the Parliament of Queensland consists the dissolution of the Legislative Assembly and of the Sovereign (expressed as the Crown) the appointment and dismissal of Ministers in and the Legislative Assembly. The Governor the event of a change of Government; is the personal representative of the • swearing-in the new Ministry at Government Sovereign in the State. House; The Governor is appointed by the • presiding over meetings of, and taking the Sovereign, by Commission, on the advice advice of, the Executive Council, which is tendered by the Premier. The appointment comprised of all members of the Ministry. In is for an unlimited term, but the accepted this role the Governor is titled Governor in convention is a term of five years. Council; The powers of the Governor are derived • issuing writs for the election of Queensland from his/her Commission, the Australia Senate representatives in Canberra; Acts, the Constitution (Office of Governor) Act 1987, the Constitution Act 1867 and • on the advice of the Government, issuing also by Acts which provide for approval writs for State elections; and by the Governor in Council. The Governor • granting a pardon, commuting a sentence, or in Council is a title used when the reprieving the execution of a sentence. Governor is acting by and with the advice of the Executive Council. -
Sendle Zones
Suburb Suburb Postcode State Zone Cowan 2081 NSW Cowan 2081 NSW Remote Berowra Creek 2082 NSW Berowra Creek 2082 NSW Remote Bar Point 2083 NSW Bar Point 2083 NSW Remote Cheero Point 2083 NSW Cheero Point 2083 NSW Remote Cogra Bay 2083 NSW Cogra Bay 2083 NSW Remote Milsons Passage 2083 NSW Milsons Passage 2083 NSW Remote Cottage Point 2084 NSW Cottage Point 2084 NSW Remote Mccarrs Creek 2105 NSW Mccarrs Creek 2105 NSW Remote Elvina Bay 2105 NSW Elvina Bay 2105 NSW Remote Lovett Bay 2105 NSW Lovett Bay 2105 NSW Remote Morning Bay 2105 NSW Morning Bay 2105 NSW Remote Scotland Island 2105 NSW Scotland Island 2105 NSW Remote Coasters Retreat 2108 NSW Coasters Retreat 2108 NSW Remote Currawong Beach 2108 NSW Currawong Beach 2108 NSW Remote Canoelands 2157 NSW Canoelands 2157 NSW Remote Forest Glen 2157 NSW Forest Glen 2157 NSW Remote Fiddletown 2159 NSW Fiddletown 2159 NSW Remote Bundeena 2230 NSW Bundeena 2230 NSW Remote Maianbar 2230 NSW Maianbar 2230 NSW Remote Audley 2232 NSW Audley 2232 NSW Remote Greengrove 2250 NSW Greengrove 2250 NSW Remote Mooney Mooney Creek 2250 NSWMooney Mooney Creek 2250 NSW Remote Ten Mile Hollow 2250 NSW Ten Mile Hollow 2250 NSW Remote Frazer Park 2259 NSW Frazer Park 2259 NSW Remote Martinsville 2265 NSW Martinsville 2265 NSW Remote Dangar 2309 NSW Dangar 2309 NSW Remote Allynbrook 2311 NSW Allynbrook 2311 NSW Remote Bingleburra 2311 NSW Bingleburra 2311 NSW Remote Carrabolla 2311 NSW Carrabolla 2311 NSW Remote East Gresford 2311 NSW East Gresford 2311 NSW Remote Eccleston 2311 NSW Eccleston 2311 NSW Remote -
Planning and Environment Court of Queensland
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Body Corporate for Mayfair Residences Community Titles Scheme 31233 v Brisbane City Council & Anor [2017] QPEC 22 PARTIES: BODY CORPORATE FOR MAYFAIR RESIDENCES COMMUNITY TITLES SCHEME 31233 (appellant) v BRISBANE CITY COUNCIL (respondent) and THE TRUSTEE FOR THE ATHOL PLACE PROPERTY TRUST (co-respondent) FILE NO/S: 3467 of 2016 DIVISION: Planning and Environment Court PROCEEDING: Planning and Environment Appeal ORIGINATING COURT: Brisbane DELIVERED ON: 26 April 2017 DELIVERED AT: Brisbane HEARING DATE: 23, 24 and 28, 29, 31 March 2017 and 5 April 2017 JUDGE: Kefford DCJ ORDER: The appeal will, in due course, be dismissed. I will adjourn the further hearing to allow for the formulation of conditions. CATCHWORDS: PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT – appeal against approval of a development application for material change of use – proposed development for re-use of heritage place, office, health care services and food and drink outlet – whether there is conflict occasioned by bulk and scale – whether there is conflict with the planning intent for the Petrie Terrace and Spring Hill Neighbourhood Plan area - whether there will be unacceptable amenity and character impacts – whether cultural heritage significance is protected - whether there are sufficient grounds to approve the proposed development despite conflict with the planning scheme – whether there is a need for the proposed development 2 Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (Qld), s 314, s 324, s 326, s 462, s 493, s 495 Acland Pastoral Co Pty -
Environmental Water Management in the Fitzroy River Valley Information Availability, Knowledge Gaps and Research Needs
Environmental Water Management in the Fitzroy River Valley Information availability, knowledge gaps and research needs Bradley J. Pusey The University of Western Australia & Jarrod Kath Western Australian Department of Water i Executive Summary The Fitzroy River is the largest river in the Kimberley region of Western Australia and contains significant biological, conservation and geoheritage values. Socio/cultural values, especially Indigenous values, are significant also but are not considered here. Current land use is dominated by rangeland grazing and very limited irrigated agriculture. The water resources of the basin are significant and potentially available for expanded agricultural development but the impact on the environment of increased water use, especially of groundwater is largely unknown. The current report addresses the availability of information that could be used to guide the formation and implementation of management strategies aimed at maintaining existing values. Currently available information useful in this regard is highly limited. Moreover, available information was found to be rarely in a form (i.e. quantitative relationships between flow and environmental factors) that would enable a full assessment of the impacts of different water resource use scenarios to be undertaken. Similarly, there is limited information that could provide the basis for ongoing assessment (i.e. monitoring) of the efficacy of any imposed water management strategies. Significant knowledge gaps were identified relating to five major themes: 1. The nature of aquatic habitats in the basin and their relationship to the flow regime and groundwater and including identity, extent and distribution, connectivity and conservation value; 2. Responses of riparian, floodplain and groundwater dependent vegetation to changes in water regime; 3. -
Ordinary Meeting No. 4416 to Be Held 13 February 2017 and Asks That Her Apologies Be Recorded for This Meeting
Hunter's Hill Council Ordinary Meeting No. 4416 13 February 2017 at 7.30 PM ORDER OF BUSINESS Acknowledgement of Country Prayer Attendance, Apologies, Declarations of Interests 1 Confirmation of Minutes 2 Mayoral Minutes & Reports Tabling of Petitions Addresses from the Public 3 Notice of Motions (including Rescission Motions) Reports from Staff 4 Our Heritage & Built Environment 5 Our Community & Lifestyle 6 Our Environment 7 Moving Around 8 Our Council 9 Committees 10 Correspondence 11 Delegates Reports 12 General Business 13 Questions With or Without Notice 14 Council in Committee of the Whole HUNTER'S HILL COUNCIL ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL Meeting 4416 - 13 February 2017 INDEX 1 – CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 1 Confirmation of Minutes of Ordinary Meeting 4415 held 12 December 2016 2 - MAYORAL MINUTES & REPORTS 2.1 Australia Day Celebrations 2017 1 3 - NOTICES OF MOTION INCLUDING RESCISSION MOTIONS Nil 4 - OUR HERITAGE & BUILT ENVIRONMENT 4.1 1 Madeline Street, Hunters Hill 6 4.2 6 Woolwich Road, Hunters Hill 20 4.3 Draft Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA) Practice Note & Circular 33 4.4 Delegated Authority Report 97 4.5 Report of Legal Matters 107 5 - OUR COMMUNITY & LIFESTYLE 5.1 Hunters Hill Food and Wine Festival 115 6 - OUR ENVIRONMENT 6.1 Environmental Improvement Program 117 7 - MOVING AROUND Nil 8 - OUR COUNCIL 8.1 Quarterly Budget Review at at 31 December 2016 121 8.2 Summary of Council Investments as at 30 November 2016 and 31 December 2016 132 8.3 Review of Delivery & Operational Plans 137 8.4 Fairland Hall 142 8.5 Leave of