No. 12-307 444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. EDITH SCHLAIN WINDSOR AND BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Respondents. ____________________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ____________________ Brief Amicus Curiae on the Merits of Citizens United’s National Committee for Family, Faith and Prayer, Citizens United Foundation, U.S. Justice Foundation, Gun Owners Foundation, The Lincoln Institute, Public Advocate of the U.S., Declaration Alliance, Western Center for Journalism, Institute on the Constitution, Abraham Lincoln Foundation, Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, English First, Protect Marriage Maryland PAC, Delegate Bob Marshall, and Senator Dick Black in Support of Resp. Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group ____________________ MICHAEL BOOS HERBERT W. TITUS* CITIZENS UNITED WILLIAM J. OLSON 1006 Pennsylvania Ave. S.E. JOHN S. MILES Washington, DC 20003 JEREMIAH L. MORGAN (202) 547-5420 ROBERT J. OLSON Attorney for Citizens United and WILLIAM J. OLSON, P.C. Citizens United Foundation 370 Maple Ave. W., Ste. 4 Vienna, VA 22180-5615 (703) 356-5070 *Counsel of Record
[email protected] January 29, 2013 Attorneys for Amici Curiae 444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Authorities ........................ iii INTEREST OF THE AMICI CURIAE ............... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ..................... 2 ARGUMENT I. THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF DOMA SECTION 3 IS GOVERNED BY THE NECESSARY AND PROPER AND SUPREMACY CLAUSES, NOT BY THE TENTH AMENDMENT ............................ 5 A. Both Courts Below Have Mistakenly Based Their Decisions on the Ground that DOMA Section 3 Is a Plenary Regulation of Marriage...........................