Mercy Tempers Justice in Nuernberg Sentencing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mercy Tempers Justice in Nuernberg Sentencing World Press Hails Nuernberg Judgment Yon Papen Engineered Austria's Nazi Downfall, Lawyer Charges Against Chiefs The background of Fraiu von ground which was instrumental in •y th» Auoctoted Pr*»» I i Papen’s activities in Austria, the Nazi occupation of Austria. a demand He further recruited from the The press of both Allied and for- I which may lead to by the Austrian government that he Austrian Nazis thousands of young mer enemy countries ac- today be turned over for trial, was men who took their place in the claimed the principle laid down by outlined here yesterday by Dr. Austrian Legion, which had head- the International Military Tribunal Julius Christopher Gauss, inter- quarters in Munich and which national and threatened during the years to that the waging of aggressive war lawyer politician, who Vienna in 193S fust invade Austria and to take the is criminal and fled punishable by before the Nazis moved in. Austrian government by surprise. death. Dr. Gauss, now an American The Austrian government was But In Rome, H Buonsenso, or- citizen, indicated that he would forced during the years of 1934 and be a witness called 1938 to the Austrian and gan of Italy’s uomo willing if by occupy qualunque the He German borders forces (common prosecution. prepared by military man) movement, which this statement for The Star: and to watch out that the Aus- often has been accused of Fascist trian Legion should not provoke a tendencies, declared that Hermann By Dr. Julius G. Gauss forceful invasion by the Nazis. Goering and 10 other Nazi chief- After the assassination of Dr. He conspired also with the mem- tains would go to the gallows only Dolfuss by the Nazis In July, 1934, bers of the Vienese police depart- because they lost a war. Hitler appointed Franz von Papen ment. The press of the Soviet Union as new Ambassador to Vienna be- Hitler, on February 11, 1938, de- expressed surprise and perplexity, cause his former ambassador was livered an ultimatum to Dr. and the newspapers of France and Nuernberg of the Nazi Schuschnigg to come to Bertesgaden (Continued From First Page.) one of the Instigators occupied Germany reflected out- Putsch which resulted in the assig- and either accept his ultimatum or right anger at the acquittals of nation and the of many be invaded by the Nazis. Hitler Karl Doenitz (10 years)—would be murdering three of the 21 Nazi leaders in the all the threatened Dr. Schuschnigg that an taken to Berlin. Austrian patriots throughout dock. But while dissatisfaction was Austrian countries. Austrian Legion of 80,000 was ready Further Action Uncertain. shown with certain aspects of the Denies Germany Involved. to march into Austria with a com- The of whether any, or Judgment of the sentences the question Hitler formally denied that he and plete underground of S. A. and S. S. all, of the men would face to in common man paper was alone in acquitted his government were implicated in They wanted organize Austria action by German denazification a‘ and Its contention that vengeance the uprising and murdering of the Nazi state, Ambassador Von boards still was unsettled. Fritsche rather than justice presided at Austrian Prime Minister, Dol- Papen affirmed that he knew from told news con- Dj-. Nuernberg. defiantly yesterday's fuss, and excused himself by saying his own experience as Austrian Am- “Who ference that he to go before bassador how an under- among the judges was hoped that everything was organized by strong such a board and clear bis name there was in without sin?” the Roman news- Dr. Franz Rinterlen who was a for- ground organization with the German Austria and he knew that paper demanded. people. mer member of the Dolfuss govern- pretended Von said he couldn’t see It said the defendants "were Papen ment and Austrian Ambassador to the Austrian Nazis were so strong reason he should have to prosecuted for an imposing total of any why Rome. they could, in case of a plebescite, do such a thing and Schacht said decide the Anschulss for the crimes from which, the After Von took his office as Nazis. however, he would wait for Papen essential crime was missing—that belligerently Austrian Ambassador in Vienna, he Forced Abdication. someone to accuse him before he of having lost." continued where his predecessor left Dr. Schuschnigg wanted to fore- offered any defense. Better War off, but in a more careful and better stall a further increase of the Nazis Preparations Seen. And it he might have “The appeared form. in Austria by setting a plebescite gallows of Nuernberg,” H the chance. Dr. Wilhelm Hoegner, organized He together with Dr. for March 13, but on March 11, Von Buonsenso (good sense) said in Its Minister-President of Barvaria, said organized, “will serve Seyss-Inquart and Dr. Fishback— Papen again entered into the pic- editorial, only to induce that any of the three acquitted men the leaders of NAZI DEFENDANTS RECEIVE freedom certificates from Col. 8. C. Andrus, commandant of who was wanted by the Nether- ture by submitting a new ultimatum every Nation to pre- NUERNBERG.—ACQUITTED remaining in the American zone their wars defendants in the war the verdict. Left to Hans lands government for crimes com- from Hitler, and forced Schuschnigg pare better, to prosecute FREEDOM—The only three crimes trial the Nuernberg Jail, following right: would be placed before a denazifica- them mitted him during the Nether- to abdicate. with greater energy and speed, here to be acquitted yesterday by the tribunal receive their Fritsche, Col. Andrus, Franz von Papen and Hjalmar Schacht. tion board promptly, which he said by to lands occupation by the Nazis—the After Schuschnigg abdicated, the initiate them when they are in —AP Wirephoto by Radio Yesterday. would “certainly’’ mean "several of still S. A. and S. 8. in all Austrian prov- first deed of Von Papen was to use possession more fearful years at hard labor.” inces. Von Papen supplied Austria his underground which he built up weapons which guarantee victory— Hoegner called the acquittal of Nazi underground with money. for four years, to plunder and loot since it has now been proved that Von Papen “astounding,” and said With Dr. Fishback and Dr. Seyss- the Austrian economy, to arrest only the fteilure to win leads to he of the Justice in thought greying diplomat Nazi unions thousands of Austrian and punishment.” Sentencing the Third Inquart, he organized patriots Mercy Tempers Nuernberg of as “the real instigator This a and created war. Two admirals, in the factories which worked for order the assassination of many me bonet government newspaper is complete description day, followed Hitler more closely and official ideologist and anti-Semitic Reich.” Erich re- rearmament in Austria, thousands of good Austrian citizens, Izvestia said that despite the short- of the sentencing of the Nazis, blindly than all the rest. Two monthi theorist, he edited the Voelkischer Karl Doenitz and Raeder, the German 10 and life Execution Being Arranged. with all his activities, he and to arrest Dr. Schuschnigg and comings of the verdict, it would parts of which were published in ago he told this court, “If I wen Beobachter for Hitler and wrote a ceive sentences of years so that are for in Austria a Nazi under- deliver him to the Gestapo. “play its role in the cause of the yesterday’s early editions. once more at the beginning I should book called “Myth of the Twentieth imprisonment, respectively. They Arrangements proceeding built up direct- the execution of the tribunal’s death moral and -defeat of fas- act once more as I did act even Century.” He was one of the are accused of building and political in the case of the staff would cism though I knew that at the end 1 Fuehrer’s earliest associates. ing Hitler’s navy in violation of sentences. A four-power commis- general and in cleansing the earth By Newbold Noyes, Jr. in Child Assailant to Pay should meet death on a bonfire.” This man’s active brain con- treaties. Doenitz receives sion made up of four military com- raise similar problems trying of its poisonous roots.” Star Staff existing Correspondent the Council other militarists. If is a tributed to a project which would his sentence with a tiny twitch of manders, appointed by in “Diverse protectors of fascism— Hess is ndt crazy, he great German at least $22,500 Settlement NUERNBERG, Oct. 1.—Justice have the Slav race relief at the corners of bis in Berlin to be responsible for the But to the public, from inmates of the Vatican to the actor. He could be either—or both destroyed by apparent By the Associated Press with was in in Nuernberg, the m*st astounding hired of the was strongly tempered This frizzle-haired forced abortions, compulsory birth tight drawn mouth. Raeder, how- executions, Nuernberg today. pens Hearst newspaper heavy-browed, about the trial was the ac- Oct. 2—James T. 40- control and the of ever, scowls at the bench be- The Council, which has authority thing JOLIET, 111., concern—mobilized all their forces mercy in this afternoon’s man of 47, with his sickly pallor and depopulation judges’ His fore his exit. to reduce or alter the sentences, but quittal of Von Papen. Lincoln, jr., 29, son of a wealthy in defense of the the minute climax to the unprece- permanent 5 o'clock shadow condi- cities through mass epidemics. making accused,” has Random interviews around the Cleveland industrialist, will pay which the war one of its most sentence is death.
Recommended publications
  • D'antonio, Michael Senior Thesis.Pdf
    Before the Storm German Big Business and the Rise of the NSDAP by Michael D’Antonio A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Honors Degree in History with Distinction Spring 2016 © 2016 Michael D’Antonio All Rights Reserved Before the Storm German Big Business and the Rise of the NSDAP by Michael D’Antonio Approved: ____________________________________________________________ Dr. James Brophy Professor in charge of thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved: ____________________________________________________________ Dr. David Shearer Committee member from the Department of History Approved: ____________________________________________________________ Dr. Barbara Settles Committee member from the Board of Senior Thesis Readers Approved: ____________________________________________________________ Michael Arnold, Ph.D. Director, University Honors Program ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This senior thesis would not have been possible without the assistance of Dr. James Brophy of the University of Delaware history department. His guidance in research, focused critique, and continued encouragement were instrumental in the project’s formation and completion. The University of Delaware Office of Undergraduate Research also deserves a special thanks, for its continued support of both this work and the work of countless other students. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Indictment Presented to the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg, 18 October 1945)
    Indictment presented to the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg, 18 October 1945) Caption: On 18 October 1945, the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg accuses 24 German political, military and economic leaders of conspiracy, crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity. Source: Indictment presented to the International Military Tribunal sitting at Berlin on 18th October 1945. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, November 1945. 50 p. (Cmd. 6696). p. 2-50. Copyright: Crown copyright is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office and the Queen's Printer for Scotland URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/indictment_presented_to_the_international_military_tribunal_nuremberg_18_october_1945-en- 6b56300d-27a5-4550-8b07-f71e303ba2b1.html Last updated: 03/07/2015 1 / 46 03/07/2015 Indictment presented to the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg, 18 October 1945) INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS — AGAINST — HERMANN WILHELM GÖRING, RUDOLF HESS, JOACHIM VON RIBBENTROP, ROBERT LEY, WILHELM KEITEL, ERNST KALTEN BRUNNER, ALFRED ROSENBERG, HANS FRANK, WILHELM FRICK, JULIUS STREICHER, WALTER FUNK, HJALMAR SCHACHT, GUSTAV KRUPP VON BOHLEN UND HALBACH, KARL DÖNITZ, ERICH RAEDER, BALDUR VON SCHIRACH, FRITZ SAUCKEL, ALFRED JODL, MARTIN BORMANN, FRANZ VON PAPEN, ARTUR SEYSS INQUART, ALBERT SPEER, CONSTANTIN VON NEURATH, AND HANS FRITZSCHE,
    [Show full text]
  • History of Nazi Dental Gold: from Dead Bodies Till Swiss Bank
    SAJ Forensic Science Volume 1 | Issue 1 www.scholarena.com Research Article Open Access History of Nazi Dental Gold: From Dead Bodies till Swiss Bank Riaud X* Doctor in Dental Surgery, PhD in History of Sciences and Techniques, Winner and Associate Member of the National Academy of Dental Surgery, Member of the National Academy of Surgery, France *Corresponding author: Riaud X, Doctor in Dental Surgery, PhD., in History of Sciences and Techniques, Winner [email protected] and Associate Member of the National Academy of Dental Surgery, Member of the National Academy of Surgery, 145,Citation: route de Vannes, 44800 Saint Herblain, France, Tel: 0033240766488, E-mail: A R T I C RiaudL E I XN (2015) F O History of NaziA DentalB S T Gold: R A CFrom T Dead Bodies till Swiss Bank. SAJ Forensic Sci 1: 105 Article history: The SS Reichsfürher Heinrich Himmler, on the 23rd of September 1940 gave the Received: 02 May 2015 SS doctors orders to collect the golden teeth in the mouth of the dead. Everybody knows that. But, who Accepted: 27 May 2015 knows who were the SS dentists directly implicated in that collection, the real Published: 29 May 2015 figures, how Nazis proceeded? Here are the answers. For the first time. Keywords: History; Dentistry; WWII; Dental gold Introduction rd of September 1940 gave the SS doctors orders to collect the golden teeth in the mouth of the dead, and also “the golden teeth that cannot be repaired”, from the mouth of the people alive. This decree,- The SS that Reichsfürher was part of Heinrich the T4 Operation, Himmler, onwas the not 23 systematically put into practice on the concentration camps prisoners.
    [Show full text]
  • Nazi Bank and Financial Institutions: U.S
    http://gdc.gale.com/archivesunbound/ NAZI BANK AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS: U.S. MILITARY GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATION REPORTS AND INTERROGATIONS OF NAZI FINANCIERS, 1945-1949 This publication comprises two collections related to Holocaust Era Assets. The first includes Records Regarding Bank Investigations and Records Relating to Interrogations of Nazi Financiers, from the records of the Office of the Finance Division and Finance Advisor in the Office of Military Government, U.S. Zone(Germany) (OMGUS), during the period 1945-1949. The second comprises Records Regarding Intelligence and Financial Investigations, 1945-1949, from the Records of the Financial Intelligence Group, Office of the Finance Adviser. These collections consist of memorandums, letters, cables, balance sheets, reports, exhibits, newspaper clippings, and civil censorship intercepts on: the financing of the German war effort and German financial institutions; reports on Nazi gold, the use of Swiss banks, and links between German and Swiss banks, inclusive of Commerzbank, Deutsche Bank, Deutsche Golddiskontbank, Dresdner Bank, and Reichs-Kredit-Gesellschaft; information regarding Aryanization, bank operations outside of Germany, industrial ties, liquidation proposals, and the restitution of Hungarian property; records concerning agricultural cooperatives; denazification of German finance personnel; an interrogation report of Hjalmar Schacht, the former Reichsminister of Economics and Plenipotentiary for the War Economy; a report on the operations of I.G. Farben AG; plans for the seizure of Reich ministerial records called "Operation Goldcup"; information relating to fiscal conditions in former German-occupied countries; report of banking in the Soviet Zone; documentation on investigations of Bernhard Berghaus, Alois Alzheimer, August von Finck, Eduard Hilgard, Kurt Schmitt, and Franz Schwede-Coburg; and, files relating to Carlowitz & Company and Japanese firms operating in Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Outcome of the International Military Tribunal ( Imt)
    OUTCOME OF THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL ( IMT) DEFENDANTS POSITION IN REICH SENTENCE RESULTS Hermann Goering Reich Marshal and Commander of the Luftwaffe Death Suicide Rudolf Hess Deputy Fuhrer Life in Prison Died in prison Joachim von Ribbentrip Reich Foreign Minister Death Hanged 10/16/46 Wilhelm Keitel Chief of the Armed Forces High Command Death Hanged 10/16/46 Ernst Kaltenbrunner Chief of the SD and head of RSHA Death Hanged 10/16/46 Alfred Rosenberg Reich Minister for the Eastern Occupied Areas Death Hanged 10/16/46 Hans Frank Governor-General of General Government Death Hanged 10/16/46 Wilhelm Frick Minister of the Interior Death Hanged 10/16/46 Julius Streicher Founder of Der Sturmer, Gauleiter of Franconia Death Hanged 10/16/46 Fritz Sauckel Plenipotentiary General for manpower Death Hanged 10/16/46 Alfred Jodl Chief of Armed Forces High Command Operations Death Hanged 10/16/46 Martin Bormann (in abstentia) Deputy Fuhrer, Head of the Chancellery Death Never Captured Franz von Papen Ambassador to Vienna and Turkey Acquitted Arthur Seyss-Inquart Reich Commissioner for Occupied Netherlands Death Hanged 10/16/46 Albert Speer Minister of Armaments and War Production 20 years Served full term Konstantine Freiherr Minister of Foreign Affairs, Reich Protector of 15 years Served 8 years Von Neurath Bohemia and Moravia Hjalmar Schacht Minister of Economics, President of Reichsbank Acquitted Walter Funk President of Reichsbank Life in prison Died in prison Karl Donitz Supreme Commander of the Navy, Chancellor 10 years Served full term Erich Raeder Supreme Commander of the Navy Life in prison Served 9 years Baldur von Schirach Leader of Hitler Youth, Gauleiter of Vienna 20 years Served full term Hans Fritzsche Head of Radio Division, Propaganda Ministry Acquitted These men were tried on the charges of conspiracy, crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946
    INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL (NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946 Page numbers in braces refer to IMT, judgment of 1 October 1946, in The Trial of German Major War Criminals. Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal sitting at Nuremberg, Germany , Part 22 (22nd August ,1946 to 1st October, 1946) 1 {iii} THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL IN SESSOIN AT NUREMBERG, GERMANY Before: THE RT. HON. SIR GEOFFREY LAWRENCE (member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) President THE HON. SIR WILLIAM NORMAN BIRKETT (alternate member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) MR. FRANCIS BIDDLE (member for the United States of America) JUDGE JOHN J. PARKER (alternate member for the United States of America) M. LE PROFESSEUR DONNEDIEU DE VABRES (member for the French Republic) M. LE CONSEILER FLACO (alternate member for the French Republic) MAJOR-GENERAL I. T. NIKITCHENKO (member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) LT.-COLONEL A. F. VOLCHKOV (alternate member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) {iv} THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS Against: Hermann Wilhelm Göring, Rudolf Hess, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Robert Ley, Wilhelm Keitel, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, Wilhelm Frick, Julius Streicher, Walter Funk, Hjalmar Schacht, Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach, Karl Dönitz, Erich Raeder, Baldur von Schirach, Fritz Sauckel, Alfred Jodl, Martin
    [Show full text]
  • Denazifying Germany: German Protestantism and the Response to Denazification in the American Zone, 1945-1948
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by White Rose E-theses Online Denazifying Germany: German Protestantism and the Response to Denazification in the American Zone, 1945-1948 By Malcolm Coates University of York Department of History Master of Arts by Research September 2014 Abstract Following the Second World War, Germany underwent a process designed to remove elements of Nazism from its population called denazification, and this process was the most far reaching in the United States’ Zone. As Germany lay in ruins, the Church experienced a surge in popularity, and the Protestant church in particular began to explore issues of guilt and judgment. In this dissertation, I aim to explore the relationship between the US Military Government, led by General Lucius Clay, and the Evangelical Church of Germany (EKD), led by Bishop Theophil Wurm, Martin Niemöller and others, on this issue of denazification. The first phase of denazification, which lasted from May 1945 – March 1946 was administered by the United States. This was the harshest phase of the process, where everyone in the US Zone had to defend their time during the war years, and many were arrested without trial simply for having an affiliation with Nazism. Due to the size of the task and the return home of many American troops, however, denazification was transferred over to German administration in 1946, and generally made more lenient thereafter. Although the council of the EKD accepted their own guilt at Stuttgart, they believed that denazification could not morally rehabilitate the Germans into society.
    [Show full text]
  • War Crimes Trials
    WAR CRIMES TRIALS THE NUREMBERG TRIALS, 1946 At their meetings during World War II, Franklin Supreme Court. Defendants were selected to represent Roosevelt, President of the United States; Winston a cross-section of German diplomatic, economic, Churchill, Prime Minister of Great Britain; and Joseph political, and military leadership. The indictments Stalin, Premier of the Soviet Union, discussed among were based upon four counts or principles. many other important issues the fate of the Nazis in Germany who were responsible for World War II. THE CHARGES Churchill thought after their identities were verified, Count One: Conspiracy to Wage Aggressive War they should simply “be shot.” Roosevelt, however, was The defendants charged under Count One are accused determined to put the Nazis on trial as war criminals of agreeing or planning to commit crimes as outlined in to make the world aware of their crimes. Count Two. The first international war crimes trial ever held began Count Two: Waging Aggressive War, or “Crimes on November 20, 1945, in Nuremberg, Germany and against Peace” lasted for eleven months. The International Military This evidence is defined as “the planning, preparation, Tribunal (IMT) was set up by the Allies—the United initiation, and waging of wars of aggression,” which States, Great Britain, the Soviet Union, and France. were also wars in violation of international treaties, Each of the Four Powers provided one judge and one agreements, and assurances. alternate and each provided prosecutors. The Chief Count Three: War Crimes Prosecutor was Robert Jackson of the United States This count deals with acts that violate traditional who was on leave from his position as a Justice of the concepts of the law of war, e.g., the use of slave labor; “THEWRONGSWHICHWESEEKTO CONDEMNANDPUNISHHAVEBEEN SOCALCULATED,SOMALIGNANT,AND SODEVASTATINGTHATCIVILIZATION CANNOTTOLERATETHEIRBEING IGNOREDBECAUSEITCANNOTSURVIVE THEIRBEINGREPEATED.” —Robert H.
    [Show full text]
  • Behrens V. Düsseldorf” * by HENNING KAHMANN and VARDA NAUMANN © 1
    Comment on the Recommendation by the Advisory Commission in the case of “Behrens v. Düsseldorf” * by HENNING KAHMANN and VARDA NAUMANN © 1 In its recommendation of February 3, 2015 2 the Advisory Commission on the return of cultural property seized as a result of Nazi persecution, especially Jewish property ( Beratende Kommission für die Rückgabe NS-verfolgungsbedingt entzogener Kulturgüter or Limbach Commission for short) has advised against the restitution of a painting. The work concerned is “Pariser Wochentag” by Adolph von Menzel. The claimant was the community of heirs to the estate of George Eduard Behrens. The respondent, the City of Düsseldorf, opposed the claim arguing that the sale of the painting from the Behrens collection to the municipal art collections (Städtische Kunstsammlungen Düsseldorf) had not been a loss of property as a consequence of Nazi persecution. I. Factual background The factual background to the recommendation was essentially as follows: “Pariser Wochentag” was painted by Adolph von Menzel in 1869 and acquired by Eduard Ludwig Behrens, the owner of L. Behrens & Söhne, a private bank in Hamburg, for his art collection in or before 1886. The painting remained in the family’s ownership until 1935. In March of that year George E. Behrens informed the Hamburger Kunsthalle about the proposed sale of 33 paintings from the Behrens collection which were on loan to the Kunsthalle. That same year, Hans-Wilhelm Hupp 3, the director of Düsselsdorf’s municipal art collections since 1933, was attempting to acquire a “major work by Menzel”. In July 1935 Menzel’s painting “Pariser Wochentag” came into the possession of the Galerie Paffrath, the same gallery which earlier that year Hupp had commissioned to look for a work by Menzel.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Ford Motor Company Became an Arsenal of Nazism
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Honors Program in History (Senior Honors Theses) Department of History May 2008 The Silent Partner: How the Ford Motor Company Became an Arsenal of Nazism Daniel Warsh University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hist_honors Warsh, Daniel, "The Silent Partner: How the Ford Motor Company Became an Arsenal of Nazism" (2008). Honors Program in History (Senior Honors Theses). 17. https://repository.upenn.edu/hist_honors/17 A Senior Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Honors in History. Faculty Advisor: Walter Licht This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hist_honors/17 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Silent Partner: How the Ford Motor Company Became an Arsenal of Nazism Abstract Corporate responsibility is a popular buzzword in the news today, but the concept itself is hardly novel. In response to a barrage of public criticism, the Ford Motor Company commissioned and published a study of its own activities immediately before and during WWII. The study explores the multifaceted and complicated relationship between the American parent company in Dearborn and the German subsidiary in Cologne. The report's findings, however, are largely inconclusive and in some cases, dangerously misleading. This thesis will seek to establish how, with the consent of Dearborn, the German Ford company became an arsenal for Hitler's march on Europe. This thesis will clarify these murky relationships, and picking up where the Ford internal investigation left off, place them within a framework of corporate accountability and complicity.
    [Show full text]
  • Editor: Sam. Eisikovits
    1 בס''ד נפלאות הבריאה The Banker Behind Hitler Editor: Sam. Eisikovits [email protected] 2 Hjalmar Schacht Horace Greeley Hjalmar Schacht (22 January 1877 – 3 June 1970, German pronunciation: [ˈjalmaɐ̯ ʃaxt]) was a German economist, banker, centre-right politician, and co-founder in 1918 of the German Democratic Party. He served as the Currency Commissioner and President of the Reichsbank under the Weimar Republic. He was a fierce critic of his country's post-World War I reparation obligations. He served in Adolf Hitler's government as President of the National Bank (Reichsbank) 1933–1939 and became Minister of Economics (August 1934 – November 1937). While Schacht was for a time feted for his role in the German "economic miracle", he opposed Hitler's policy of German re-armament insofar as it violated the Treaty of Versailles and (in his view) disrupted the German economy. His views in this regard led Schacht to clash with Hitler and most notably with Hermann Göring. He was dismissed as President of the Reichsbank in January 1939. He remained as a minister without portfolio, and received the same salary, until he was fully dismissed from the government in January 1943. In 1944, Schacht was arrested by the Gestapo after the assassination attempt on Hitler on 20 July 1944 because he allegedly had contact with the assassins. Subsequently, he was interned until the end of the Third Reich in the concentration camps Ravensbrück and later at Flossenbürg. In the last days of the war, he was one of the 134 special and clan prisoners who were transported by the SS from Dachau into the "Alpine Fortress" to Niederdorf in South Tyrol, where they were freed on 30 April 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • Tabulation of Nurnberg Sentences—Individual Defendants
    International Law Studies—Volume 45 International Law Documents The thoughts and opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily of the U.S. Government, the U.S. Department of the Navy or the Naval War College. 308 (21) Tabulation of Nurnberg Sentences—Individual Defendants Count Count Count Count Sentence 1 2 3 4 Hermann Goering C c C C Hanging. Rudolf Hess C c A A Life. Joachim von Ribbentrop c c C C Hanging. Wilhelm Keitel c c C C Hanging. Ernst Kaltenbrunner A C C Hanging. Alfred Rosenberg C c C C Hanging. Hans Frank A C C Hanging. Wilhelm Frick A c C C Hanging. Julius Streicher A C Hanging. Walther Funk A c C C Life. Hjalmar Schacht A A Acquitted. Karl Doenitz A C C 10 Years. Erich Raeder C C C Life. Baldur von Schirach A C 20 Years. Fritz Sauckel A A C C Hanging. Alfred Jodl C C C C Hanging. Martin Bormann A c C Hanging. Franz von Papen A A Acquitted. Arthur Seyss-Inquart A C c C Hanging. Albert Speer A A c C 20 Years. Constantin von Neurath. C C c C 15 Years. Hans Fritzsche A A A Acquitted. A = acquitted. C = convicted. Indicted Groups and Organizations Reich Cabinet Not criminal. Leadership Corps of the Nazi Party Criminal in part. SS {Schutzstaffeln), including SD (Sicherheitsdienst) Criminal. SA (Sturmabteilung) Not criminal. Gestapo {Geheime Staatspolizei) Criminal. General Staff and High Command of the Armed Forces Not criminal. (22) Resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations, 11 December 1946 (Journal of the United Nations, No.
    [Show full text]