DOCSLIB.ORG

Professor from Kharkiv University Selected As New Director of CIUS Dr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Professor from Kharkiv University Selected As New Director of CIUS Dr CIUS Newsletter 2012 Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies 4­30 Pembina Hall, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H8 Professor from Kharkiv University Selected as New Director of CIUS Dr. Volodymyr Kravchenko, profes­ otechestvennoi istorii [D. I. Bahalii sor of history and chair of the Depart­ and His Contribution to the Study of ment of Ukrainian Studies at the National History], Kharkiv, 1990); a Vasyl Karazin National University of historiographic study of the Istoriia Kharkiv, has been chosen as the fourth Rusiv [History of the Rusʹ People] (“Po- director of the Canadian Institute of ema vol'noho narodu”: “Istoriia Rusiv” Ukrainian Studies. He succeeds Dr. Ze­ ta її mistse v ukraїns'kii istoriohrafiї non Kohut, who served as acting direc­ [“A Story of a Free People”: The His- tor of CIUS in 1993–94 and, beginning tory of the Rusʹ People and its Place in in 1994, as director. Dr. Kravchenko Ukrainian Historiography], Kharkiv, was appointed after an international 1996); a survey of Ukrainian histori­ search that began in the fall of 2011. ography from the mid­eighteenth to Interviews with the three finalists were the mid­nineteenth century (Narysy held in the spring of 2012, and the z ukraїns'koї istoriohrafiї epokhy selection took place shortly thereafter. natsional'noho Vidrodzhennia (druha In September 2012 Dr. Kravchenko polovyna XVIII‒seredyna XIX st. [Es­ arrived in Edmonton to assume his says on Ukrainian Historio graphy of position as CIUS director. the Period of National Revival: From Dr. Kravchenko is no stranger to Volodymyr Kravchenko, new CIUS director the Late Eighteenth to the Mid­Nine­ CIUS. He has been working with the Ramsay Tompkins Visiting Professor in teenth Century], Kharkiv, 1996); a Institute since 2000 as director of the 2011–12. He is thus well known to the study of the border city of Kharkiv Kowalsky Eastern Ukrainian Institute, academic and broader community in (Khar'kov/Kharkiv: stolytsia Pohranych- established under the auspices of the Edmonton. In Ukraine, he has devel­ chia [Kharkov/Kharkiv: A Border Chair of Ukrainian Studies at Kharkiv oped a reputation as an accomplished Capital], Vilnius, 2011), and, most University and funded through the scholar, a strong administrator, and recently, Ukraïna, imperiia, Rosiia: Kowalsky Program for the Study of a successful teacher who has worked vybrani statti z modernoï istoriï ta Eastern Ukraine at CIUS. The Institute toward the revival of Ukrainian studies istoriohrafiï [Ukraine, Empire, Russia: serves as the Kowalsky Program’s base in eastern Ukraine. Selected Articles on Modern History for developing eastern Ukrainian stud­ Dr. Kravchenko obtained his Mas­ and Historiography], Kyiv, 2011). ies and sponsoring an active program ter’s (Kharkiv, 1980), Candidate’s (Kyiv, Dr. Kravchenko has an impressive of research and publications that en­ 1986), and Doctor of Sciences (Kyiv, teaching record. He has long been af­ compasses local history, ethnography, 1997) degrees in history. His fields of filiated with the Vasyl Karazin National and literature. In 2003 the Kowalsky specialization are Ukrainian histori­ University, where he began teach­ Eastern Ukrainian Institute established ography; the history of universities in ing in 1986. He has also held visiting a Zaporizhia branch that has been very Ukraine; regional and border studies; professorships at several universities active in compiling and publishing and the history of Kharkiv. He is the in Ukraine and abroad, including the numerous oral­history sources. author of some 150 scholarly publica­ Kyiv­Mohyla Academy National Uni­ Dr. Kravchenko has also visited the tions, including four monographs: a versity (2003); the European University University of Alberta and CIUS on sev­ study of the historian Dmytro Bahalii in St. Petersburg (2005); the Harvard (D. I. Bagalei i ego vklad v izuchenie eral occasions, most recently as Stuart continued on page 3 CIUS Newsletter 2012 1 From the Director Passing the CIUS Bulava In Cossack Ukraine, the head man with the response of a scholar com­ this issue of the Newsletter). or hetman was selected by a General pletely unknown to me—Volodymyr In passing the CIUS bulava to Military Council that included rep­ Kravchenko. After additional corre­ Volodymyr, I am confident that CIUS resentatives of all ranks. Once the spondence and a face­to­face meeting has a bright future. I congratulate council agreed on a candidate, he was in Ukraine, I became convinced that Volodymyr on his many achievements, given the ceremonial mace or bulava Professor Kravchenko was the key including his appointment as director that symbolized his authority. to our program’s success in eastern of CIUS. For my part, I look forward to In a way, there was a similar selec­ Ukraine. continuing to direct the program that tion and passing of the bulava at CIUS I initiated, the Kowalsky Program for this year. The selection process for the the Study of Eastern Ukraine, and to new CIUS director was quite inclusive performing any other duties that may and exhaustive. The Selection Com­ be assigned to me by the new direc­ mittee included not only administra­ tor. I will, of course, continue to be a tors and professors from the Faculty of professor in the Department of History Arts but also representatives of CIUS, and Classics. the CIUS Advisory Council, and the Since this is my last column as di­ Ukrainian community. This committee rector of CIUS, I would like to reiterate narrowed down the list of applicants to that it has been my privilege to serve as a final three. director for more than eighteen years. Each candidate was invited to During that time, I have endeavoured campus for a public academic lecture, to promote the development of Ukrai­ a public vision presentation and, of nian studies in Canada, Ukraine, and course, a formal interview. During the world. I strove to make CIUS a vi­ their visits, the candidates met with able and vibrant institution. The many CIUS staff and interested faculty mem­ achievements of the last eighteen years bers. Each candidate was featured in would not have been possible without Ukrainian News, Edmonton’s Ukrai­ Zenon Kohut, outgoing CIUS director the work of outstanding colleagues and nian newspaper. The university com­ My decision proved amply justified. staff. I also thank my family, friends, munity and the public at large were In 2000, Volodymyr was able to estab­ donors, and Ukrainian community also given the opportunity to write lish the Kowalsky Eastern Institute of members who have given me such evaluations of the candidates that were Ukrainian Studies at the V. N. Kara­ outstanding support. I wish Volodymyr subsequently presented to the Selection zin National University of Kharkiv. Kravchenko every success, and I offer Committee. In the ensuing decade, the Kowalsky any assistance I can provide in making After this exhaustive selection Eastern Institute devoted its efforts to the transition as smooth and effec­ process, the bulava was passed to Dr. establishing and expanding a modern tive as possible. The CIUS bulava is in Volodymyr Kravchenko of the Kharkiv intellectual space in eastern Ukraine, excellent hands. National University. My relationship developing international academic with Volodymyr goes back to 1999. At contacts, and encouraging young that time, Michael and Daria Kowal­ people to take up Ukrainian studies. sky had just made a pledge to increase To that end, the Institute carried out a their endowment fund to $2,000,000 very ambitious program of scholarly in order to establish the Kowalsky Pro­ research, publications, conferences, gram for the Study of Eastern Ukraine. and symposia. Much of this success As they paid out this commitment in was due to Volodymyr Kravchenko’s installments between 1998 and 2000, leadership and organizational abilities. I sought a reliable partner in eastern At the same time, he became a scholar Ukraine. In 1999 I issued a call for pro­ of outstanding international repute (a posals and was particularly impressed fuller biography appears elsewhere in 2 CIUS Newsletter 2012 Lead Article New CIUS Director various scholarly projects. He is the John Kolasky Memorial Fellowship Continued from page 1 founding editor and editor­in­chief of (CIUS, 2002 and 2008), the Eugene the journal Skhid-Zakhid (East­West) and Daymel Shklar Research Fellow­ and serves on the editorial boards of ship (Harvard University, 2001), “Best the scholarly journals Harvard Ukrai- Lecturer in the Humanities” from nian Studies, Journal of Ukrainian the Kharkiv regional administration Studies, and Ukraїna Moderna). He is (2000), the Petro Mohyla Award of the a member of the Advisory Council of Ministry of Education and Science of the Mykhailo Hrushevsky Institute of Ukraine (2004), and the Solomea Pav­ Ukrainian Archaeography and Source lychko Prize of the American Council Studies, National Academy of Sciences of Learned Societies (2010). of Ukraine; founder of the D. I. Bahalii Research Centre for Ukrainian Studies at the Karazin University; and found­ ing board member and first president of the International Association for the Humanities. Dr. Kravchenko was also Canadian Institute of chair of the Department of History Ukrainian Studies and Museum Studies at the Kharkiv 4­30 Pembina Hall National Academy of Culture (1999– University of Alberta 2001); director and editor­in­chief of Edmonton, AB a project to publish selected works of T6G 2H8 A recent publication by Volodymyr Kravchen- ko titled “Ukraïna, imperiia, Rosiia: Vybrani Dmytro Bahalii in six volumes (1999– Telephone: (780) 492–2972 statti z modernoï istoriï ta istoriohrafiï” 2009); director of a state research FAX: (780) 492–4967 [Ukraine, Empire, Russia: Selected Articles on program on collective identities in the E­mail: [email protected] Modern History and Historiography] Ukrainian­Russian borderland (2005– CIUS Web site: www.cius.ca Ukrainian Summer Institute (2006); 12); and a founding board member of CIUS Newsletter Helsinki University (2010), and, most the National Committee of Historians Reprints permitted with recently, the University of Alberta of Ukraine (2006).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WHOSE LANGUAGE DO WE SPEAK? Some Reflections on The
    A. Portnov, T. Portnova, S. Savchenko, V. Serhiienko, Whose Language...? Ab Imperio, 4/2020 the objectivity myth and emphasized the relevance of any historical text’s literary form but also, as some critics have argued, “denied the possibility 3 Andrii PORTNOV of fruitful professional discourse except within communities of believers.” White’s influential theory provoked no discussion in either Soviet or dias- Tetiana PORTNOVA pora Ukrainian historiography. During late perestroika, historians usually Serhii SAVCHENKO debated the challenges of writing new history in terms of “filling the blank Viktoriia SERHIIENKO spots” and overcoming Soviet censorship.4 There were Ukrainian scholars who responded to some of their Moscow-based colleagues’ call to embrace the methodology of the French Annales school and study mentalities,5 or make history a “true science” and study historical sources with mathematical methods.6 In the 1980s and 1990s, neither the drift toward historical anthro- WHOSE LANGUAGE DO WE SPEAK? pology and microhistory nor the strengthening of the traditional positivist Some Reflections on the Master Narrative approach by means of the historical method’s “machinization” helped to address the challenges of Metahistory. of Ukrainian History Writing One of the very first Ukrainian surveys of American poststructuralist his- tories warned that these encouraged scholars to take a narcissist stance and allow arbitrary analysis.7 Later a prominent Ukrainian conservative historian, Yaroslav Dashkevych, denounced White’s “extreme relativism”
    [Show full text]
  • SITUATION with STUDYING the HISTORY of the UKRAINIAN COSSACK STATE USING the TURK-OTTOMAN SOURCES Ferhad TURANLY
    Karadeniz İncelemeleri Dergisi: Yıl 8, Sayı 15, Güz 2013 205 SITUATION WITH STUDYING THE HISTORY OF THE UKRAINIAN COSSACK STATE USING THE TURK-OTTOMAN SOURCES Ferhad TURANLY ABSTRACT Available studies of the Turk-Ottoman sources on the history of Ukraine in the period of Cossacks have been presented and considered. The problem concerning development of the Oriental Studies has been analysed. There has been used a methodology that is a new contribution to the academic study of the issues relating to the history of the development of relations between the Cossack Hetman Ukraine and the Ottoman State. Keywords: Ottoman, Ukrainan, a Cossack, a study, oriental studies. OSMANLI-TÜRK KAYNAKLARINA GÖRE UKRAYNA KOZAK DÖNEMİ TARİH ÇALIŞMALARI ÖZ Bu makalede, Ukrayna Kozak dönemi tarihi hakkında Osmanlı zamanında ortaya çıkmış araştırmalar değerlendirilmiştir. Söz konusu kaynakların Ukrayna tarihi açısından ele alındığı araştırmada Şarkiyat biliminin gelişmesiyle iligili sorunlardan da bahsolunmaktadır. Uygun usullerin kullanılmasıyla, bu kaynakla- rın, Kazak Hetman Ukraynası ve Osmanlı Devleti arasındaki ilişki- lerin tarihinin derinliğinin öğrenilmesini sağlayacağı, araştırmada varılan temel sonuçlardan biridir. Anahtar Sözcükler: Araştırma, Şarkiyat, Kozak, Osmanlı, Ukrayna. A reader at Kyiv National University “Kyiv Mohyla Academy”, [email protected] 206 Journal of Black Sea Studies: Year 8, Number 15, Autumn 2013 In the source base on Ukraine’s History and Culture, in particular, concerning its Cossack-Hetman period, an important place belongs to a complex of Arabic graphic texts, as an important part of which we consider a series of Turk sources – written and other kinds of historical commemorative books and documents, whose authors originated from the countries populated by the Turk ethnic groups.
    [Show full text]
  • One Ukraine Or Many? Regionalism in Ukraine and Its Political Consequences
    Nationalities Papers, Vol. 32, No. 1, March 2004 One Ukraine or Many? Regionalism in Ukraine and Its Political Consequences Lowell W. Barrington & Erik S. Herron Intra-state regional differences are a central topic in the study of European and Eurasian politics. In Ukraine, regional differences have proven to be powerful predictors of mass attitudes and political behavior. But what does the “regional factor” in Ukrainian politics represent? Is it simply the result of compositional effects, or are the regional differences more than just a sum of other demographic factors correlated with geographic divisions? When analyzing regional divisions as an explanatory variable, what are the implications of employing different regional frameworks? In this article, we demonstrate how geographic divisions in the country hold up even when others factors—such as ethnicity and language use—are con- trolled for. As part of this inquiry, we compare the results of three competing regional frameworks for Ukraine: one with two regions, one with four regions and one with eight regions. While the eight-region framework is uncommon in studies of Ukraine, the decision to examine eight regions is supported by historical, economic and demographic arguments, as well as by the results of the statistical analyses presented in this article. Scholars who have focused on fewer regions in Ukraine may have underestimated the effects of regional differences and missed interesting stories about intra-state variation in Ukrainian attitudes and voting behavior. The results of this study carry important implications not only for the study of Ukraine but also for those interested in intra-state regional divisions across Europe and Eurasia.
    [Show full text]
  • BENCE AGENCY SOURCES METHODS EXEMPT ION 3B2B NAZI WAR CR IMES DISCLOSURE ACT DATE 2007 22 SUBJECT: Trip to the Ukraine 27 July - 18 Aug 1963
    ricer d 9009tvrrpor"P FORWARDED DECLASSIFIED AND RELEASED BY CENTRAL I NTELL !BENCE AGENCY SOURCES METHODS EXEMPT ION 3B2B NAZI WAR CR IMES DISCLOSURE ACT DATE 2007 22 SUBJECT: Trip to the Ukraine 27 July - 18 Aug 1963 - — J -- -) /2- SOURCE :(Sh, interviewed by P. on 9 and. 10 Sept 1963) . DATE : 15 Nov 1963 1. The trip_ was organized and led by the Source (ough her agency). It consisted of 15 persons, mainly elderly American-born ladies of Ukrainian descent. In the group was also Sources husband who returned after 1 weeks s-ojourn in the Ukraine 0 New York; KUROUS, Stepan and KUROPAS I I:yron - both of CHICAGO,Ill., POIOVYCH Inaria of CLEVELAND,Ohio, and 3 postwar emigrants, of whom one had served with Red Army. Itinerary: LVIV - CHERNIVTSI - ODESsA - KAUIV - KIEV - KEARKIV - MOSCOW. Though it was Sources fourth trip to the Ukraine she regarded it as a peculiar one because of the VIP treatment the group was given in the Ukraine, and the increased evident vigilance of Soviet authorities toward tourists. Finally, because of Inturists suggestion to Source to organize on their behalf (as their"re presentative " ) trip s of Americans of Ukrainian descent to the Ukraineyand of Sov. Ukrainians to the States. 2. Surveillance. All members of the griup and in particular Source herse: were in all cities incl. MOSCOW , subjected to an intense surveillance. Also guides followed much stronger rules than usaal and thus when one tourist in Moscow wanted to mail letter on her way to the bank she was refused to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • The Residence of Bukovyna and Dalmatia Metropolitans in Chernivtsi
    THE RESIDENCE OF BUKOVYNA AND DALMATIA METROPOLITANS IN CHERNIVTSI NOMINATION BY THE GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE OF THE FOR INSCRIPTION THE RESIDENCE OF BUKOVYNA AND DALMATIA METROPOLITANS I N CHERNIVTSI ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST 2008 PREPARED BY GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE, STATE AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL OF YURIJ FEDKOVYCH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY TABLE OF CONTENTS Summery…………………………………………………………………………..…5 1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY 1.A Country . …... 16 1.B State, province or region . …………..…18 1.C Name of property . …….….19 1.D Geographical coordinates to the nearest second. Property description . ……. 19 1.E Maps and plans . ………...20 1.F Area of nominated property and proposed buffer zone . .. … . ..22 2. DESCRIPTION 2.A Description of property . ………........26 2.B History and development . .………………..38 3. JUSTIFICATION FOR INSCRIPTION 3.A Criteria under which inscription is proposed and justifi cation for inscription 48 3.B Proposed statement of outstanding universal value . 54 3.C Comparative analysis . 55 3.D Integrity and authenticity . 75 4. STATE OF CONSERVATION AND FACTORS AFFECTING THE PROPERTY 4.A Present state of conservation . .79 4.B Factors affecting the property . 79 (i) Development pressures . 80 (ii) Environmental pressures . 80 (iii) Natural disasters and risk preparedness . 80 (iv) Visitor/tourism pressures . 81 (v) Number of inhabitants within the property and the buffer zone . .. 87 5. PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE PROPERTY 5.A Ownership . 90 5.B Protective designation . 98 5.C Means of implementing protective measures . 110 5.D Existing plans related to municipality and region in which the proposed property is located . 111 5.E Property management plan or other management system .
    [Show full text]
  • Fragment of a 17Th-Century Glass Wine Goblet
    16 Canadio-Byzantina 23 (January 2012) REPORTS Excavations at Baturyn in 2011 During the summer of 2011 the Canada-Ukraine archaeological expedition resumed its annual excavations in Baturyn, Chernihiv province, Ukraine. The Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies (CIUS), the Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies (PIMS) in Toronto, and the Shevchenko Scientific Society of America (SSS-A) co-sponsor the project. Prof. Zenon Kohut, Director of CIUS, heads this undertaking; Prof. Orest Popovych, President of SSS-A, is its patron and academic adviser; Dr. Volodymyr Kovalenko, University of Chernihiv, leads the expedition. Dr. Volodymyr Mezentsev (CIUS), Prof. Martin Dimnik (PIMS), and Huseyin Oylupinar, Ph.D.candidate (University of Alberta), are also engaged in the excavation and the publication of its findings. The 2011 expedition recruited 75 students and scholars from the universities and museums of Chernihiv, Nizhyn, Kyiv, Sumy, Baturyn, Hlukhiv, Melitopol, Chernivtsi in Ukraine, and Toronto and Edmonton in Canada. From 1669 to 1708, Baturyn was the capital of the Cossack Hetman state that reached its zenith under the rule of the enlightened Hetman Ivan Mazepa (1687-1709). In alliance with Sweden he attempted to liberate central Ukraine from increasing Moscow domination but the Russian army suppressed his insurrection and destroyed Baturyn in 1708. This year’s expedition continued excavating the remnants of Mazepa’s fortified court located in the Baturyn suburb of Honcharivka. Around 1699 he commissioned the erection of the three-story masonry palace; it was unrivalled in the Cossack realm and became his principal residence. Archaeological and architectural investigations of the palace’s remnants in 2003-10 have established that it was built and adorned in a mature Vilnius (Wilno) Baroque style and enriched with the ornate polychrome glazed ceramic revetments of the Kyivan Baroque style.
    [Show full text]
  • Iuliia Kysla
    Rethinking the Postwar Era: Soviet Ukrainian Writers Under Late Stalinism, 1945-1949 by Iuliia Kysla A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Department of History and Classics University of Alberta © Iuliia Kysla, 2018 Abstract This dissertation advances the study of late Stalinism, which has until recently been regarded as a bizarre appendage to Stalin’s rule, and aims to answer the question of whether late Stalinism was a rupture with or continuation of its prewar precursor. I analyze the reintegration of Ukrainian writers into the postwar Soviet polity and their adaptation to the new realities following the dramatic upheavals of war. Focusing on two parallel case studies, Lviv and Kyiv, this study explores how the Soviet regime worked with members of the intelligentsia in these two cities after 1945, at a time when both sides were engaged in “identification games.” This dissertation demonstrates that, despite the regime’s obsession with control, there was some room for independent action on the part of Ukrainian writers and other intellectuals. Authors exploited gaps in Soviet discourse to reclaim agency, which they used as a vehicle to promote their own cultural agendas. Unlike the 1930s, when all official writers had to internalize the tropes of Soviet culture, in the postwar years there was some flexibility in an author’s ability to accept or reject the Soviet system. Moreover, this dissertation suggests that Stalin’s postwar cultural policy—unlike the strategies of the 1930s, which relied predominantly on coercive tactics—was defined mainly by discipline by humiliation, which often involved bullying and threatening members of the creative intelligentsia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1983
    З r I Hr published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association! s- - CO CD —X Д З> z я a-e. Ukrainian Weekl o-t o Vol. LI No. 10 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY. MARCH 6. 1983 25 і cents Catherine Yasinchuk, 86, dies; Historian's wife brutally beaten wrongly committed for 48 years by unknown assailants in Lviv PHILADELPHIA - Catherine Ya­ Russian, German, Austrian dialects, sinchuk, 86, who was wrongly institu­ Polish and Lithuanian. LVIV - The wife of Ukrainian at Lviv University, Mr. Dashkevych tionalized for 48 yeq`rs because she did Then Olga Mychajluk, an employee historian Yaroslav Dashkevych was was a reference specialist at the Aca­ not know English/died here at the in the state institution's personnel hospitalized after she was brutally demy of Sciences in Lviv before his Fairview Nursing Home in Erdenheim department, tried to talk to her in beaten by two men early in the year arrest in 1948. Imprisoned along with on Monday, February 14. Ukrainian. Miss Yasinchuk responded, while on her way home from work, his mother, he was released in 1956. No one had eVer heard of Miss and bit by bit she began to talk. reported the Harvard Ukrainian Re­ Soon after their release, his mother Yasinchuk until 1968, when, during a search Institute. died. It was learned that she had come to Liudmyla Dashkevych, whose hus­ Mr. Dashkevych has since become review ofthe status of patients at the United States alone at the age of IS. Philadelphia State Hospital, it was band is a noted Armenian specialist, one of the Soviet Union's most promi­ She met a young man, fell in love and was returning from her job as an editor nent experts in Armenian and Oriental learned that Miss Yasinchuk had been had a baby.
    [Show full text]
  • Carpathian Mountains - Lviv
    Sample Dance Tour to Ukraine 14 Days | 13 Nights See the Old World in a New Way Each Dance Group Tour we take to Ukraine is completely unique – and that’s because every group is unique! We can tailor this tour to suit your group’s needs and budget. However – we want to make sure you get the most out of your trip! So we’ve included some of our highlights here. Below is a SAMPLE 14 day itinerary, to give you an idea of what we can offer, what we can include and what kind of price to expect. Let this tour inspire you – and your group – to plan your next trip to Ukraine! Kyiv – Chernivtsi – Carpathian Mountains - Lviv Sightseeing | Workshops | Cultural Experiences | Village Visits Day 1 TOUR START DATE | Kyiv (-/-/D) Welcome to Ukraine! Upon arrival in Kyiv, you’ll be met at the airport by your Tour Leader and chauffeured to your hotel, located in the heart of the city center. Your Tour Leader will be with you throughout your entire trip – every step of the way. More than just a guide - they will be your personal travel host, along with your private driver and vehicle. Together, they’ll make sure you get where you need to go, and be available to stop when you need along the way. Not to mention, they’ll show you the best places to eat, and help you with all the small details, from using the bank machines to showing you where to find the best gifts at the market - and negotiating for the best price! They’ll share the best of Ukraine, tell you about its history, and show you the modern Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Seminar in Ukraine
    Program Rates, per person based on double occupancy: Ukraine Main Tour:$6,490 • Single Supplement: $895 Belarus Pre-Tour: $2,350 • Single Supplement: $495 Moldova Post-Tour: $2,245 • Single Supplement: $375 Included: All accommodation, hotel taxes • Meals per itinerary (B=breakfast, L=lunch, D=dinner) • Arrival/departure transfers for passengers arriving/departing on scheduled start/end days • Inter- nal airfare from Chernivtisi to Odessa and from Odessa to Kiev • All overland transportation per Seminar in Ukraine itinerary by private vehicles • Special cultural events and extensive sightseeing, including entrance fees • English-speaking guides and Tour Manager throughout the itinerary • Baggage handling at the July 11-21, 2022 hotels; gratuities to local guides, drivers, Tour Manager and restaurant staff during included meals • Visa support (excluding visa fees) • Comprehensive pre-departure packet with Lecturer Dr. Carla Thorson, Senior Vice President, Not Included: International airfare to Lviv/from Kiev. Our tour operator MIR Corporation can World Affairs Council of Northern California assist with reservations • Travel insurance • Meals not included in the itinerary • Personal items such as telephone calls, laundry, excess baggage fees, visa fees, alcoholic beverages Belarus pre-tour extension: July 8-11 Air Arrangements: Program rates do not include international airfare to Lviv/from Kiev. Be- Moldova post-tour extension: July 21-24 cause of the global nature of our members and patrons, there is no group flight for this program. A recommended flight itinerary will be sent by our tour operator upon confirmation. What to Expect: This trip is moderately active due to the substantial distances covered and the extensive walking and stair climbing required.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Flags of the Ukrainian Regions: Old Traditions and New Designs
    Contemporary flags of the Ukrainian regions: Old traditions and new designs Andriy Grechylo Abstract Ukraine consists of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and 24 oblasts (regions or provinces). The new law on local self-governments, adopted by the Verkhovna Rada (Parliament) of Ukraine in 1997, allowed local authorities to confirm the coats of arms, flags, and other symbols of oblasts, rayons (districts), cities, towns, and villages. Over the last six years, all oblasts have adopted their own symbols. Most of them have already adopted regional flags. Many of these flags have old historical signs and colours (Volyn, Ivano-Frankivsk, Lviv, etc.), but some oblasts have chosen new designs (Donetsk, Cherkasy, Kherson, and others). Ukraine is divided into 25 administrative territories — 24 oblasts (provinces or re- gions) and the Autonomous Republic of Crimea. Two cities, Kyiv and Sevastopol, have a special, national status. The oblast borders have remained unchanged since 1959, when Drohobych oblast was joined to the Lviv oblast (Fig. 1). After the disintegration of the Ruthenian Kingdom (Galician-Volynian State) in the middle of the 14th c., the Ukrainian lands were divided among various neighbour- ing countries. During this time the arms of separate administrative territories were used. When Ukraine was absorbed into the USSR, none of the oblasts possessed their own arms or flag. Only after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the declaration of Ukrainian independence did a process of the formation of symbols of administrative territories begin. The first regional coat of arms was ratified for the Transcarpathian (Zakarpattya) oblast in December 1990. In 1992 the symbols of Crimea, which received the status of an autonomous republic, were adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerability: Regional Aspects
    Ukraine UKRAINE May, VULNERABILITY: 2020 REGIONAL ASPECTS Children in Ukraine Children account for more than a quarter of the country’s population. Almost 7.6 million children and young people live in Ukraine (0-17 years). 160 169 345 172 238 277 183 304 Chernihiv 234 272 238 Sumy Kyiv Volyn Rivne 248 432 Zhytomyr 558 233 485 417 279 235 447 199 241 490 196 Kharkiv 339 Lviv 245 City of Kyiv 214 Poltava Luhansk 211 579 276 Khmelnytskiy Cherkasy Ternopil 286 285 556 588 301 167 Ivano-Frankivsk Dnipropetrovsk 665 291 Vinnytsya Kirovohrad 176 285 184 293 Donetsk 206 Zakarpattya 185 290 Chernivtsi 468 210 196 Zaporizhzhya 435 Mykolayiv 199 Odesa Kherson 7,580 — — 2018 60 336 2011 8,003 Sevastopol Autonomous Republic (city council) of Crimea UKRAINE Figure 1. Number of Children in Ukraine by region, absolute number (thousands) for every child, love FOLLOW US: Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | unicef.org.ua 1 MAY, 2020 VULNERABILITY: REGIONAL ASPECTS Children in the СOVID-19 Affected Regions COVID-19 pandemic continues to spread in Ukraine. Restrictive measures are in place in Ukraine, incl. extending Ukraine’s quarantine untill 22 May 2020. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Ukraine imposed the state of emergency in all oblasts to maximize mobilization of resources and protect public health. Besides, it imposed restrictive measures: airway and railway traffic suspended, intercity and international bus service stopped. The COVID-19 pandemic and countrywide quarantine created a situation where 42,000 children (among 103,000 children) from 15 22 56 118 boarding schools were returned to 87 Chernihiv Sumy Volyn Kyiv their biological families or placed Rivne 38 in camps / shelters / rehabilitation Zhytomyr 180 41 77 18 3 31 City of Kharkiv centers, simultaneous and without Lviv 73 28 Poltava Luhansk Khmelnytskiy Kyiv any proper social work with such Ternopil Cherkasy 23 44 53 11 6 families.
    [Show full text]