DOCSLIB.ORG

About What About: Topicality at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
About What About: Topicality at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface About What About: Topicality at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface Justin Bledin & Kyle Rawlins JHU Philosophy & JHU CogSci SALT, May 9, 2021 1 / 34 Main target: English what about, which is highly productive, semantically and pragmatically complex, and has received minimal analytic attention. (1)A: Which trees can you create bonsai from? ( antecedent) B: {What/How} about sequoia? head prejacent • Intrinsic interest: non-sentential construction with an interesting and complex set of uses. Massively underspecified. • Extrinsic interest: prominent in literature on topicality, but largely in secondary role as diagnostic. (Gundel 1974, 1988; Jackendoff 1972; Buring¨ 2003; Ebert et al. 2014; Beaver et al. 2017) • Bonus target: “whataboutism”: (2) (Trump tweet on July 22, 2017) What about all of the Clinton ties to Russia, including Podesta Company, Uranium deal, Russian Reset, big dollar speeches, etc. 2 / 34 About what about, pr´ecis What about XP (i) presupposes an antecedent Question Under Discus- sion/QUD, and (ii) asks a subquestion of the antecedent that is aligned with the denotation of the prejacent XP. • (Question Under Discussion / QUD: Roberts 1996, 2012; Ginzburg 1996; van Kuppevelt 1996; Buring¨ 2003; Beaver & Clark 2008 a.m.o) • Getting the alignment right is complicated. • Our final proposal is implemented using a structured meaning (aka. “functional”) approach to questions (von Stechow 1991; Krifka 2001): what about interacts with the antecedent QUD by (iii) narrowing the QUD’s restriction via the prejacent XP. • What about can trigger QUD accommodation, and (iv) leaves the background of the antecedent question entirely unspecified; in consequence is extremely pragmatically flexible. • In particular, productively allows shifting an accommodating hearer’s QUD. 3 / 34 Plan (i) Background: ‘what about’ and topicality (ii) Data: compositional flexibility (iii) Data: functional heterogeneity (iv) Analysis try 1: local topic analysis (v) Analysis try 2: unstructured aboutness (vi) Analysis try 3: a structured approach (vii)‘ what about’ and whataboutism 4 / 34 Precedents from topicality literature • Gundel’s (1974/1988) diagnostic for the “pragmatic topic” of a subsequent utterance: (3) What about Archie? (Gundel, ex. 46) a. Archie rejected the proposal. b. #It was [ARCHIE]F who rejected the proposal. • What abouts as cues to contrastive topics (Jackendoff 1972; Buring¨ 2003; Beaver et al. 2017): (4)A: Well, what about FRED? What did HE eat? B: [FRED]CT ate the [BEANS]F. (Jackendoff, ex. 6.145) (5)A: Well, what about the BEANS? Who ate THEM? B: [FRED]F ate the [BEANS]CT. (Jackendoff, ex. 6.146) 5 / 34 Existing proposal: Ebert et al. (2014): reduce aspects of left-dislocation constructions to “what about” questions, discussed (briefly) in terms of questioning/QUD. In a nutshell, “what about XP?” (i) establishes the prejacent XP as a referential topic (ii) raises a QUD: what propertiesJ K are true of XP ? J K 6 / 34 Compositional flexibility Compositional flexibility puzzle: What about can combine with a very broad range of constituents including DPs, APs, certain TPs, certain CPs, and more. How to account composi- tionally for this generality? • Entity-topic-based accounts focus on only a small piece of the puzzle (referential DPs). • The head can be either what about or how about, but other wh-items aren’t supported (construction-like or idiom-like): (6) a. fWhat/Howg about Joanna? b.* fWho/When/Why/Whereg about Joanna? • Just about anything can show up in the prejacent, both nominal and clausal. 7 / 34 Compositional flexibility: non-clausal prejacents Easy way to generate examples: let the antecedent be a question that targets the prejacent constituent as a short answer. (This is a clue...) (7)A: Who should we invite to the party? B: How about fJoanna/everybody/nobodyg? (DP prejacents) (8)A: When should we meet? B: What about fon Tuesday/before the partyg? (PP prejacents) (9)A: What color should we paint the room? B: What about green? (AP prejacent) (10)A: What speed should I drive? B: How about slowly? (AdvP prejacent) (11)A: What should we do this summer? B: How about hike the Pacific Coast Trail? (VP prejacent) B0: How about hiking the Pacific Coast Trail? (gerundive/non-finite prejacent) 8 / 34 Compositional flexibility: clausal prejacents • It’s possible to use the ‘short answer’ strategy to force some full CP prejacents (and to some degree non-finite forms): (12)A: What surprised you the most? B: How about that we won? (that-clause prejacent) • If -clauses are also ok for some speakers, leading to readings similar to what if questions: (Bledin & Rawlins, 2019) (13)A: Who could possibly be the murderer? B: What (about) if the butler lied about his alibi? • A noticeable gap: sentential tensed clauses (i.e. ‘full answers’) are not good as prejacents: (Culicover & Jackendoff, 2005) (14)A: What surprised you the most? B: *How about we won? 9 / 34 Clausal prejacents (cont.) (15)A: Who could possibly be the murderer? We’ve ruled everyone out! B: *What about the butler lied about his alibi? (16)A: Would you like a drink? (after Culicover & Jackendoff 2005 ch. 7 ex. 11d) B: Yeah, how/what about a scotch? B0: *Yeah, how/what about I would like a scotch? Exception to the gap: can use futurate present TPs as prejacent (Copley, 2009, 2008, 2014; Bochnak, 2019), but only with how about: (17)A: What color should we paint the room? B: How about we paint it green?) B0: *What about we paint it green? 10 / 34 Compositional flexibility, recap The XP prejacent in a what about can take a wide range of syntactic forms, with the major exception of regular tensed clauses. 11 / 34 Functional heterogeneity Functional heterogeneity puzzle What about moves can serve a wide variety of discourse purposes includ- ing suggesting a plan in response to a practical question, challenging an interlocutor’s proposal, elaborating on prior lines of discussion, and more. How to interpret what about to account for this pragmatic flexibility? • Suggestive uses. What about questions can be used to make a suggestion. Arguably: tentatively offer a complete or partial answer to the current QUD. (18) Where should we go for dinner? fWhat/Howg about The Brewer’s Art? (19) Which trees can you create bonsai from? What about sequoia? (20)A: Why do my roommates keep moving out? B: What about because you never clean up after yourself? 12 / 34 Functional heterogeneity (cont.) • Contrastive uses. What abouts can be “contrastive questions” asked to redirect a stream of inquiry by laterally shifting the QUD: (21)A: What did Mary eat? (ex. 4 from Beaver et al. 2017) B: [She]CT ate [pie]F. A: Well, what about Fred? What did he eat? B: [Fred]CT ate the [beans]F. (What did Mary eat? is a subquestion of Who ate what?, which is a superquestion of What did Fred eat?) (Many cases of whataboutism fall in this category.) • Challenging uses. (Bledin & Rawlins’s 2020 “resistance moves”): (22)A: Kenny G is the GOAT of saxophone. (‘GOAT’ = Greatest Of All Time) B: Umm, what about Coltrane? (23)A: Open the window! B: What about the mosquitos? 13 / 34 Functional heterogeneity (cont.) • Many more uses besides. • When can’t what about be used? Generally not great discourse-initial, though some planning uses are ok: (24) Context: opening sentence of a history lecture. #What about if Napolean had won at Waterloo? (25) How about we go have breakfast at Little Purity Diner? • Often bad in response to direct factual questions. (26)A: What is that fruit you’re eating? B:??What/how about a persimmon? B0: A persimmon. / ??Is it a persimmon? (27)A: What could this fruit possibly be? B: Is it a persimmon? B0: What about a persimmon? Rough generalization: they are about as bad as regular question responses to questions—a highly context-sensitive matter. 14 / 34 Functional heterogeneity, recap What abouts can be used in a wide variety of functions depending on the context of use. Key cases: suggestions, contrastive questioning, chal- lenges. 15 / 34 Analyzing what about: two topical approaches “In the literature on topicality, its discursive effect is often said to be captured by raising the question What about X?, where X is the topical entity. We implement this idea by assuming that the REF act of topic establishment introduces the question ‘What properties are true of X?’ as the current question under discussion.” (Ebert et al. 2014 p. 375) We can extract two (paired) proposals from this: (i) Asking What about XP? establishes the prejacent denotation XP as a new topic( ≈ dref) in the discourse (via REF), drawing hearers’J K attention towards it. (“local topic analysis”; cf. “centering” approaches to pronoun resolution Grosz, Joshi & Weinstein 1983, 1995; Dekker 1994; Bittner 2014) (ii) Asking What about XP? introduces the new QUD/discourse topic: what properties are true of XP ? (“global topic analysis”) J K 16 / 34 Local topic analysis Do we really need a question-based analysis? Pure local topic story: (28) c + pwhat about XPq = c + Topic(XP) This is plausible for many suggestive uses, which might be assimilated (at least to a certain extent) to consider-imperatives: (29)A: Who knew the combination to the safe? B: What about the butler? B0: Well, consider the butler. However, many what abouts, including some suggestive uses, seem to be bona fide questions. 17 / 34 Local topic analysis (cont.) • Applying Sadock’s (1974) tell me and by any chance diagnostics: (30)A: Does this medicine have any side-effects? B: Not in the prescribed dosage. A: OK. But tell me, fwhat about/#considerg when one takes twice the prescribed amount? (31) Does anyone have a car we can borrow? fWhat about/#Considerg Maria, by any chance? • What abouts pattern like regular questions in terms of turn-taking and response-hood: (32)A: How about going for breakfast at Little Purity Diner? (A looks expectantly at B) B: Sure.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Online Russia, Today
    Online Russia, today. How is Russia Today framing the events of the Ukrainian crisis of 2013 and what this framing says about the Russian regime’s legitimation strategies? The case of the Russian-language online platform of RT Margarita Kurdalanova 24th of June 2016 Graduate School of Social Sciences Authoritarianism in a Global Age Adele Del Sordi Dr. Andrey Demidov This page intentionally left blank Word count: 14 886 1 Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.Literature Review .................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Legitimacy and legitimation ............................................................................................. 5 2.2. Legitimation in authoritarian regimes ............................................................................. 7 2.3 Media and authoritarianism .............................................................................................. 9 2.4 Propaganda and information warfare ............................................................................. 11 3.Case study ............................................................................................................................. 13 3.1 The Russian-Ukrainian conflict of 2013 .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Framing Environmental Movements: a Multidisciplinary Analysis of the Anti-Plastic Straw Movement
    Framing Environmental Movements: A Multidisciplinary Analysis of the Anti-Plastic Straw Movement MPP Professional Paper In Partial Fulfillment of the Master of Public Policy Degree Requirements The Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs The University of Minnesota Caroline Arkesteyn 5/1/2020 Peter Calow, Professor Mark Pedelty, Professor _______________________________ ________________________________________ Typed Name & Title, Paper Supervisor Typed Name & Title, Second Committee Member ` FRAMING ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENTS A Multidisciplinary Analysis of the Anti-Plastic Straw Movement Caroline Arkesteyn Humphrey School of Public Affairs | University of Minnesota Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Literature Review 2.1. The Public Policy Process 2.2. Social Movements Theory 2.3. Framing Theory 3. The Movement 3.1. The Environmental Issue 3.2. Spurring Event 3.3. Social Media Trajectory 3.4. Issue Framing 3.4.1. Frames Used by Supporters 3.4.2. Frames Used by Critics 3.4.3. Message and Participant Motivation 3.5. Industry Response 3.6. Policy Response 3.6.1. Seattle 3.6.2. California 3.6.3. New York City 3.6.4. United Kingdom 3.7. Critiques 4. Conclusions and Recommendations 4.1. Policy Recommendations 4.1.1. Investing in Recycling Technology and Infrastructure 4.1.2. Implementing a “Producer-Pays” Fee on Single-Use Plastics 4.1.3. Expanding Environmental Education 4.2. Communications Recommendations 4.2.1. Systems-Focused Language 4.2.2. Highlighting Agency 4.2.3. Social Media Communication and Agenda-Setting 5. Implications and Future Research 1 I. INTRODUCTION In the late months of 2017, a new viral message began circulating social media platforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Journal (PDF)
    SAPIR A JOURNAL OF JEWISH CONVERSATIONS THE ISSUE ON POWER ELISA SPUNGEN BILDNER & ROBERT BILDNER RUTH CALDERON · MONA CHAREN MARK DUBOWITZ · DORE GOLD FELICIA HERMAN · BENNY MORRIS MICHAEL OREN · ANSHEL PFEFFER THANE ROSENBAUM · JONATHAN D. SARNA MEIR SOLOVEICHIK · BRET STEPHENS JEFF SWARTZ · RUTH R. WISSE Volume Two Summer 2021 And they saw the God of Israel: Under His feet there was the likeness of a pavement of sapphire, like the very sky for purity. — Exodus 24: 10 SAPIR Bret Stephens EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Mark Charendoff PUBLISHER Ariella Saperstein ASSO CIATE PUBLISHER Felicia Herman MANAGING EDITOR Katherine Messenger DESIGNER & ILLUSTRATOR Sapir, a Journal of Jewish Conversations. ISSN 2767-1712. 2021, Volume 2. Published by Maimonides Fund. Copyright ©2021 by Maimonides Fund. No part of this journal may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the prior written consent of Maimonides Fund. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. WWW.SAPIRJOURNAL.ORG WWW.MAIMONIDESFUND.ORG CONTENTS 6 Publisher’s Note | Mark Charendoff 90 MICHAEL OREN Trial and Triage in Washington 8 BRET STEPHENS The Necessity of Jewish Power 98 MONA CHAREN Between Hostile and Crazy: Jews and the Two Parties Power in Jewish Text & History 106 MARK DUBOWITZ How to Use Antisemitism Against Antisemites 20 RUTH R. WISSE The Allure of Powerlessness Power in Culture & Philanthropy 34 RUTH CALDERON King David and the Messiness of Power 116 JEFF SWARTZ Philanthropy Is Not Enough 46 RABBI MEIR Y. SOLOVEICHIK The Power of the Mob in an Unforgiving Age 124 ELISA SPUNGEN BILDNER & ROBERT BILDNER Power and Ethics in Jewish Philanthropy 56 ANSHEL PFEFFER The Use and Abuse of Jewish Power 134 JONATHAN D.
    [Show full text]
  • FAKE NEWS!”: President Trump’S Campaign Against the Media on @Realdonaldtrump and Reactions to It on Twitter
    “FAKE NEWS!”: President Trump’s Campaign Against the Media on @realdonaldtrump and Reactions To It on Twitter A PEORIA Project White Paper Michael Cornfield GWU Graduate School of Political Management [email protected] April 10, 2019 This report was made possible by a generous grant from William Madway. SUMMARY: This white paper examines President Trump’s campaign to fan distrust of the news media (Fox News excepted) through his tweeting of the phrase “Fake News (Media).” The report identifies and illustrates eight delegitimation techniques found in the twenty-five most retweeted Trump tweets containing that phrase between January 1, 2017 and August 31, 2018. The report also looks at direct responses and public reactions to those tweets, as found respectively on the comment thread at @realdonaldtrump and in random samples (N = 2500) of US computer-based tweets containing the term on the days in that time period of his most retweeted “Fake News” tweets. Along with the high percentage of retweets built into this search, the sample exhibits techniques and patterns of response which are identified and illustrated. The main findings: ● The term “fake news” emerged in public usage in October 2016 to describe hoaxes, rumors, and false alarms, primarily in connection with the Trump-Clinton presidential contest and its electoral result. ● President-elect Trump adopted the term, intensified it into “Fake News,” and directed it at “Fake News Media” starting in December 2016-January 2017. 1 ● Subsequently, the term has been used on Twitter largely in relation to Trump tweets that deploy it. In other words, “Fake News” rarely appears on Twitter referring to something other than what Trump is tweeting about.
    [Show full text]
  • RESEARCH and REPORT by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research and Echelon Insights for the Reporters Committee for Freedom for the Press and the Democracy Fund
    RESEARCH AND REPORT BY Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research and Echelon Insights for the Reporters Committee for Freedom for the Press and the Democracy Fund PRESS FREEDOM FOR THE PEOPLE 1 Table of contents Foreword 2 Key Findings 4 Trust in National Media 5 Regaining Trust 7 Appendix A: Media Sources 21 Appendix B: Media Doubts and Facts 24 __________________________ ã2018 All Rights Reserved, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner PRESS FREEDOM FOR THE PEOPLE 2 Foreword By Jenn topper communications director, reporters committee for freedom of the press A robust free press is vital to an informed public. It’s with that in mind that we sought to understand the public’s perceptions of press freedom at a moment in time when trust in the press remains low, and when the president of the United States regularly deems members of the press “enemy of the people” and refers to entire news organizations as “fake news.” The research took on even more significance after the murder of four journalists and one sales assistant at the Capital Gazette in Annapolis, Maryland, by a gunman who had a long history of making threats against the newspaper. We learned, through a series of focus groups and a 2,000-voter survey, that there is a lack of urgency around the idea that press freedom is at risk here in the U.S. Press freedom advocates see an alarming confluence of threats to journalists and the news media, including harmful rhetoric emanating from ã2018 All Rights Reserved, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner PRESS FREEDOM FOR THE PEOPLE 3 government officials, investigations of unauthorized disclosures to the press, tighter restrictions on access to the White House and key agencies and officials, lawsuits targeted at crippling or bankrupting news outlets, all combined with increasing economic strain on newsrooms.
    [Show full text]
  • BPGC at Semeval-2020 Task 11: Propaganda Detection in News Articles with Multi-Granularity Knowledge Sharing and Linguistic Features Based Ensemble Learning
    BPGC at SemEval-2020 Task 11: Propaganda Detection in News Articles with Multi-Granularity Knowledge Sharing and Linguistic Features based Ensemble Learning Rajaswa Patil1 and Somesh Singh2 and Swati Agarwal2 1Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering 2Department of Computer Science & Information Systems BITS Pilani K. K. Birla Goa Campus, India ff20170334, f20180175, [email protected] Abstract Propaganda spreads the ideology and beliefs of like-minded people, brainwashing their audiences, and sometimes leading to violence. SemEval 2020 Task-11 aims to design automated systems for news propaganda detection. Task-11 consists of two sub-tasks, namely, Span Identification - given any news article, the system tags those specific fragments which contain at least one propaganda technique and Technique Classification - correctly classify a given propagandist statement amongst 14 propaganda techniques. For sub-task 1, we use contextual embeddings extracted from pre-trained transformer models to represent the text data at various granularities and propose a multi-granularity knowledge sharing approach. For sub-task 2, we use an ensemble of BERT and logistic regression classifiers with linguistic features. Our results reveal that the linguistic features are the reliable indicators for covering minority classes in a highly imbalanced dataset. 1 Introduction Propaganda is biased information that deliberately propagates a particular ideology or political orientation (Aggarwal and Sadana, 2019). Propaganda aims to influence the public’s mentality and emotions, targeting their reciprocation due to their personal beliefs (Jowett and O’donnell, 2018). News propaganda is a sub-type of propaganda that manipulates lies, semi-truths, and rumors in the disguise of credible news (Bakir et al., 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Fake News: Faith-Based Alternative Information Ecosystems in the U.S. and Europe
    Religion and Fake News: Faith-based Alternative Information Ecosystems in the U.S. and Europe Christopher Douglas | 6 January 2018 Summary he intersection of fake news and religion is marked by three asymmetries. First, fake news circulates more among Americans than Europeans. Second, fake news circulates T among conservatives more than liberals. Third, fake news for conservatives often feature religious themes. The origin of the fake news information-entertainment ecosystem lies largely in Christian fundamentalism’s cultivation of counter-expertise. The intersection of fake news and religion today is being exploited by Russia to subvert Western democracies and deepen social divisions. Western countries need to strengthen mainstream evidence-based journalism, incorporate conservative religious leaders into mainstream discussions, and detach high religiosity from fake news information ecosystems. Page 1 About the Report This report was commissioned by the Cambridge Institute on Religion & International Studies (CIRIS) on behalf of the Transatlantic Policy Network on Religion and Diplomacy (TPNRD). About the TPNRD The TPNRD is a forum of diplomats from North America and Europe who collaborate on religion-related foreign policy issues. Launched in 2015, the network is co-chaired by officials from the European External Action Service and the U.S. Department of State. About CIRIS CIRIS is a multi-disciplinary research centre at Clare College, Cambridge. CIRIS’s role as the Secretariat of the TPNRD is generously supported by the Henry Luce Foundation’s initiative on religion in international affairs. For further information about CIRIS, visit ciris.org.uk. About the Author Christopher Douglas teaches American literature and religion at the University of Victoria, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Spy Culture and the Making of the Modern Intelligence Agency: from Richard Hannay to James Bond to Drone Warfare By
    Spy Culture and the Making of the Modern Intelligence Agency: From Richard Hannay to James Bond to Drone Warfare by Matthew A. Bellamy A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (English Language and Literature) in the University of Michigan 2018 Dissertation Committee: Associate Professor Susan Najita, Chair Professor Daniel Hack Professor Mika Lavaque-Manty Associate Professor Andrea Zemgulys Matthew A. Bellamy [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6914-8116 © Matthew A. Bellamy 2018 DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to all my students, from those in Jacksonville, Florida to those in Port-au-Prince, Haiti and Ann Arbor, Michigan. It is also dedicated to the friends and mentors who have been with me over the seven years of my graduate career. Especially to Charity and Charisse. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication ii List of Figures v Abstract vi Chapter 1 Introduction: Espionage as the Loss of Agency 1 Methodology; or, Why Study Spy Fiction? 3 A Brief Overview of the Entwined Histories of Espionage as a Practice and Espionage as a Cultural Product 20 Chapter Outline: Chapters 2 and 3 31 Chapter Outline: Chapters 4, 5 and 6 40 Chapter 2 The Spy Agency as a Discursive Formation, Part 1: Conspiracy, Bureaucracy and the Espionage Mindset 52 The SPECTRE of the Many-Headed HYDRA: Conspiracy and the Public’s Experience of Spy Agencies 64 Writing in the Machine: Bureaucracy and Espionage 86 Chapter 3: The Spy Agency as a Discursive Formation, Part 2: Cruelty and Technophilia
    [Show full text]
  • Dataset of Propaganda Techniques of the State-Sponsored Information Operation of the People’S Republic of China
    Dataset of Propaganda Techniques of the State-Sponsored Information Operation of the People’s Republic of China Rong-Ching Chang Chun-Ming Lai [email protected] [email protected] Tunghai University Tunghai University Taiwan Taiwan Kai-Lai Chang Chu-Hsing Lin [email protected] [email protected] Tunghai University Tunghai University Taiwan Taiwan ABSTRACT ACM Reference Format: The digital media, identified as computational propaganda provides Rong-Ching Chang, Chun-Ming Lai, Kai-Lai Chang, and Chu-Hsing Lin. a pathway for propaganda to expand its reach without limit. State- 2021. Dataset of Propaganda Techniques of the State-Sponsored Informa- tion Operation of the People’s Republic of China. In KDD ’21: The Sec- backed propaganda aims to shape the audiences’ cognition toward ond International MIS2 Workshop: Misinformation and Misbehavior Min- entities in favor of a certain political party or authority. Further- ing on the Web, Aug 15, 2021, Virtual. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5 pages. more, it has become part of modern information warfare used in https://doi.org/10.1145/nnnnnnn.nnnnnnn order to gain an advantage over opponents. Most of the current studies focus on using machine learning, quantitative, and qualitative methods to distinguish if a certain piece 1 INTRODUCTION of information on social media is propaganda. Mainly conducted Propaganda has the purpose of framing and influencing opinions. on English content, but very little research addresses Chinese Man- With the rise of the internet and social media, propaganda has darin content. From propaganda detection, we want to go one step adopted a powerful tool for its unlimited reach, as well as multiple further to providing more fine-grained information on propaganda forms of content that can further drive engagement online and techniques that are applied.
    [Show full text]
  • Abra Berens, “The Return of a Chef” by Madeleine Hill Vedel More, Rethinking the Role of Vegetables Sun Contributor on the Plate, and in the Pantry
    Glen Arbor Sun Here to Enlighten You Volume XXV, Issue X OUR 25TH YEAR October 8, 2020 www.GlenArbor.com FREE! Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore turns 50 with virtual party By Jacob Wheeler within the current boundaries of the Sun editor park. … My hope is the Sleeping Bear Dunes of 2045 is as recognizable as it Twenty-five years from now a fu- is today and the relationship created ture superintendent of Sleeping Bear over the next 25 years contributes to Dunes National Lakeshore will open a the park you are managing today.” time capsule stored in a metal lockbox In the time capsule the future super- and read a letter written to them by intendent will also find memorabilia Scott Tucker, the Lakeshore’s current showing what it felt like to experience superintendent, on the occasion of 2020 here in northwest Michigan. The Sleeping Bear’s 50th anniversary on items in the lockbox will tell the story of October 21. a global pandemic—of signs encourag- “As Sleeping Bear Dunes National ing people to wear masks and practice Lakeshore celebrates the 50th anni- social distancing, of a spring shutdown versary of the park’s establishment, of the National Lakeshore prompted we must remember our story is not by COVID, a celebrated reopening, a finished,” wrote Tucker. “Throughout record number of visitors during a gor- 2020 and 2021, we will look to how geous summer, and also record-high the past 50 years will shape the next Lake Michigan water levels. As intense, 50. One key piece of the celebration bewildering and painful as 2020 has is acknowledging how we have gotten felt, Sleeping Bear Dunes has leant us to where we are today.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliography on Event Semantics and Related Matters
    A Bibliography on Event Semantics and Related Matters Events: Modification, Aspect and Lexical Meaning Cleo Condoravdi and Hana Filip LSA Institute Stanford July, 2007 References [1] Abusch, Dorit. 1985. On Verbs and Time. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. [2] Abusch, Dorit. 1986. Verbs of Change, Causation, and Time. Technical Report CSLI-86-50, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University. [3] Abusch, Dorit. 2005. Causatives and Mixed Aspectual Type. In Gregory N. Carlson and Francis J. Pelletier, eds., 29–61. [4] Abusch, Dorit and Mats Rooth. 1990. Temporal Adverbs and the English Perfect. NELS 20, 1–15. [5] Alexiadou Artemis, Monika Rathert and Arnim von Stechow (eds.). 2003. Perfect Explorations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. [6] Allen, James. 1983. Maintaining Knowledge about Temporal Intervals. CACM 26, 832–843. [7] Allen, James. 1984. Towards a General Theory of Action and Time. Arti- ficial Intelligence 23, 123–154. [8] Arregui, Ana. To appear. When aspect matters: the case of would- conditionals. Natural Language Semantics. [9] Artstein, Ron. 2006. Quantificational Arguments in Temporal Adjunct Clauses. Linguistics and Philosophy 28, 541–597. 1 [10] Asher, Nicholas. 1992. A Default, Truth Conditional Semantics for the Progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 463–508. [11] Asher, Nicholas. 1993. Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dor- drecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [12] Asher, Nicholas and Pierre Sablayrolles. 1995. A Typology and Discourse Semantics for Motion verbs and Spatial PPs in French. Journal of Seman- tics 12, 163–209. [13] Bach, Emmon. 1981. On Time, Tense, and Aspect: An Essay in English Metaphysics. In Peter Cole, ed., Radical Pragmatics, 63–81.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Formal Semantics, Going Beyond What I Know First-Hand
    !"#$"##% Introduction ! “Semantics” can mean many different things, since there are many ways to be interested in “meaning”. One 20th century debate: how much common ground across logic, philosophy, and linguistics? The History of ! Formal semantics, which says “much!”, has been shaped over the last 40+ years by fruitful interdisciplinary collaboration among linguists, Formal Semantics philosophers, and logicians. ! In this talk I’ll reflect mainly on the development of formal semantics and to a lesser extent on formal pragmatics in linguistics and philosophy starting in the 1960’s. Barbara H. Partee ! I’ll describe some of the innovations and “big ideas” that have shaped the MGU, May 14, 2011 development of formal semantics and its relation to syntax and to (= Lecture 13, Formal Semantics Spec-kurs) pragmatics, and draw connections with foundational issues in linguistic theory, philosophy, and cognitive science. May 2011 MGU 2 Introduction “Semantics” can mean many different things ! I’m not trained as a historian of linguistics (yet) or of philosophy; what I know best comes from my experience as a graduate student of Chomsky’s ! “Semantics” used to mean quite different things to linguists in syntax at M.I.T. (1961-65), then as a junior colleague of Montague’s at and philosophers, not surprisingly, since different fields have UCLA starting in 1965, and then, after his untimely death in 1971, as one different central concerns. of a number of linguists and philosophers working to bring Montague’s " Philosophers of language have long been concerned with truth and semantics and Chomskyan syntax together, an effort that Chomsky reference, with logic, with how compositionality works, with how himself was deeply skeptical about.
    [Show full text]