DOCSLIB.ORG

Equality in Practice EQUAL RIGHTS TRUST Despite This, Evident Inequality and Discrimination Persists in All Areas of Ser- IMPLEMENTING SERBIA’S EQUALITY LAWS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Equality in Practice EQUAL RIGHTS TRUST Despite This, Evident Inequality and Discrimination Persists in All Areas of Ser- IMPLEMENTING SERBIA’S EQUALITY LAWS The Equal Rights Trust is the global centre for excellence in equality law. Our vision is an equal world and our mission is to eliminate discrimina- tion and ensure everyone can participate in society on an equal basis. We work in partnership with equality defenders to secure the adoption and implementation of equality laws. In 2009 the Republic of Serbia adopted the Law on the Prohibition on Discrim- ination (LPD), which, alongside other important pieces of equality legislation and underpinned by a Constitutional protection for equality, establishes an almost comprehensive regime for the protection of the rights to equality and non-discrimination. Equality in Practice EQUAL RIGHTS TRUST RIGHTS EQUAL Despite this, evident inequality and discrimination persists in all areas of Ser- IMPLEMENTING SERBIA’S EQUALITY LAWS - bian life. Just short of the LPD’s tenth anniversary, this study finds evidence of rightsnumerous to equality flaws in and the non-discrimination implementation of in Serbia’s practice. equality and non-discrim ination framework. These flaws are limiting the effective realisation of the inter alia, evidence of aThis lack study of public identifies awareness the key of equality factors thatlaw andare concepts,preventing high Serbia’s court frameworkcosts, frag- mentedon equality legal from aid provision,providing effectivephysical andprotection. structural It finds, barriers preventing access Equality in Practice to courts, procedural delays, mistrust in the judiciary, and weaknesses in the current legislative framework. The study notes that none of these issues are insurmountable and concludes by making a series of recommendations to the state to this end. By following these recommendations, it is hoped that the aspiration evident in the LPD of an equal Serbia, may begin to come to fruition. This publication was produced with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the Equal Rights Trust and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. www.equalrightstrust.org EQUAL RIGHTS TRUST EQUAL RIGHTS TRUST Equality in Practice IMPLEMENTING SERBIA’S EQUALITY LAWS London, January 2019 The Equal Rights Trust is the global centre for excellence in equality law. Our vision is an equal world and our mission is to eliminate discrimination and ensure everyone can participate in society on an equal basis. We work in partnership with equality defenders to secure the adoption and implementation of equality laws. © January 2019 Equal Rights Trust © Cover Design: Istvan Fenyvesi © Cover Photo: Darko Vojinovic/AP/Shutterstock Photo caption: “A man walks through the tunnel painted in the colours of the SerbianPrinted flag in in the downtown UK by Stroma Belgrade, Ltd Serbia.” ISBN: 978-1-9996789-4-4 al system or transmitted in any form or by other means without the prior written permission of All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated, reproduced, stored in a retriev- the publisher, or a licence for restricted copying from the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd., UK, or the Copyright Clearance Centre, USA. Equal Rights Trust 244-254United Cambridge Kingdom Heath Road London, E2 9DA www.equalrightstrust.orgTel. +44 (0)207 610 2786 The Equal Rights Trust is a company limited by guarantee incorporated in England, and a registered charity. Company number 5559173. Charity number 1113288. This publication was produced with the Europeanfinancial support Union. of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the Equal Rights Trust and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Table of Contents Acknowledgements Acronyms and Abbreviations Executive Summary 1. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT 1 1.1 Purpose and Structure of the Study 2 1.2 Conceptual Framework 3 1.3 Project Team 3 1.4 Research Methodology 4 1.5 Country Context 7 1.6 Recent Historical and Political Context 8 1.7 Branches of Government and Statutory Bodies 10 1.8 Discrimination in Serbia: Why is this Study Needed? 14 2. THE LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK RELATED TO EQUALITY 26 2.1 International and Regional Law 26 2.1.2 Other Treaties Related to Equality 29 2.1.1 Major United Nations Treaties Related to Equality 26 2.1.3 Regional Human Rights Treaties 30 2.1.4 European Union Legislation Related to Equality 31 2.1.5 Customary International Law 32 2.1.6 Status of International Obligations in National Law 33 2.2 National Law 34 2.2.1 The Constitution 34 2.2.2 Specific Anti-Discrimination Laws 39 2.2.2.1 Interaction Between the Specific Anti-Discrimination Laws 40 2.2.2.2 The Law on the Prohibition of Discrimination 46 2.2.2.3 The Law on the Prevention of Discrimination of Persons with Disabilities 60 2.2.2.4 The Law on Gender Equality 66 2.2.3 Non-Discrimination Provisions in Other Legal Fields 71 2.3 National Policies 78 3. ENFORCEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SERBIA’S EQUALITY LAWS 81 3.1 Access to Justice 81 3.1.1 Legal Framework 82 3.1.2 Practical Barriers 87 3.2 Remedies and Sanctions 93 3.2.1 Civil Proceedings 94 3.2.2 Complaints Procedure to the Commissioner 97 3.2.3 Misdemeanour Proceedings 100 3.3 Enforcement 100 3.3.1 The Judiciary 100 3.3.2 The Commissioner for the Protection of Equality 105 3.4 Compliance with Equality Laws by State and Private Actors 115 4. RECOMMENDATIONS 121 Annexes Bibliography 127 141 Acknowledgements Praxis This study is publishedSandzak by the Equal Committee Rights Trust, in partnership with Associa- projecttion of Citizens between Praxis the partners ( )that and seeks Sandzak to increase Committee protection for Protection from all of forms Human of discriminationRights and Freedoms in Serbia ( through legal and policy). The reform. study forms The study part of is a published two-year in both an English-language and a Serbian-language version. oped by the Equal Rights Trust. The lead researchers of the study were Professor The conceptual framework, structure and research methodology were devel- Nevena Petrušić, the inaugural Commissioner for the Protection of Equality in Serbia (2010–2015) and professor at the Faculty of Law at the UniversityResearch of Nis, Consultantsand Ms Kosana Beker, Assistant to the Commissioner for the Protection of Equal- ity in Serbia (2010–2016) and equality law academic and consultant ( ). Lucy Maxwell, Legal and Programmes Officer at the Equal Rights Trust, conducted research on international and regional human rights law and editorialbest practice. oversight. Professor Petrušić, Ms Beker and Lucy then co-drafted the study. Joanna Whiteman, the Trust’s Co-Director, provided guidance and substantive The Trust and its partners wereĆirić greatly assisted in the development of the study, by a six-member expert Working GroupĐurić comprising the following leaders from Serbia’s civil society: Dragana Milovanović and Lazar Stefanovic (Mental Disability Rights Initiative); Milan (Gayten); Tamara Lukšić Orlandić (inde- pendent expert); Vanja Macanović (Autonomous Women’s Centre); Osman Balić (S-KRUG League of Roma); and Vladimir Petronijević (Grupa 484). The Working Group provided feedback on the research methodology, facilitated three com- munity consultation meetings, provided written comments on the study’s con- tents and attended a two-day study validation meeting in June 2018. The Trust content.would like to thank each individual member of the Working Group for their con- tributions to the research for this study and their advice on the study’s form and The findings and recommendations of this study are based on extensive field rangeresearch of stakeholdersconducted from including mid-2017 government to early and 2018. private As sector outlined representatives below, the Research Consultants conducted over fifty one-to-one interviews with a wide lawyers and civil society organisations in different regions of Serbia. The team and attended focus groups with more than 150 survivors of discrimination, vii would like to thank all of those persons who gave their time and reflections to shape the findings of the study. conducted interviews and focus groups with survivors of discrimination in Five Serbian civil society organisations, whose work was co-ordinated by Praxis, different regions of Serbia. The organisations were: Da se zna! (It should be known!); Roma Researchers; The Network of the Committees for Human Rights in Serbia (CHRIS); the Association of Students with Handicaps; and the Centre for Prevention of Crime and Post-Penal Help (NEOSTART). Union. The contents of the study are the sole responsibility of the Equal Rights This study has been produced with the financial assistance of the European European Union. The Trust wishes to extend its sincere thanks to the staff at the EuropeanTrust and Unioncan in whono circumstances have supported be ourregarded work. as reflecting the position of the Acronyms and Abbreviations Anti-Discrimination Action Plan for the Implementation of the Action Plan Anti-Discrimination Strategy Anti-Discrimination Strategy Strategy of Prevention and Protection Against 2014–2018 CAT InhumanDiscrimination or Degrading 2013–2018 Treatment or Punish mentConvention against Torture and Other Cruel, CAT Committee Committee against Torture - CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women CEDAW Committee Committee on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women CERD Committee on the Elimination of Racial Dis crimination CESCR - Rights CHRIS Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural in Serbia Commissioner CommissionerNetwork of the forCommittees the Protection
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report to the Government of Serbia on the Visit to Serbia Carried out by The
    CPT/Inf (2012) 17 Report to the Government of Serbia on the visit to Serbia carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 1 to 11 February 2011 The Government of Serbia has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government’s response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2012) 18. Strasbourg, 14 June 2012 - 2 - CONTENTS Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT's report ............................................................................4 I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................5 A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation ..............................................................5 B. Establishments visited...............................................................................................................6 C. Consultations held by the delegation and co-operation received .........................................7 D. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention establishing the CPT ......................................................................................................................................8 E. National Preventive Mechanism ..............................................................................................8 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED ..............................10 A. Establishments under the authority of the Ministry of Interior.........................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Community Rights Assessment Report Fourth Edition
    COMMUNITY RIGHTS ASSESSMENT REPORT FOURTH EDITION NOVEMBER, 2015 Cover photograph: OSCE/Šehida Miftari, March 2015 Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe MISSION IN KOSOVO Community Rights Assessment Report Fourth Edition November, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1. INTER-COMMUNITY DIALOGUE ..................................................................................................... 6 Inter-ethnic dialogue and dealing with the past ................................................................................ 6 Education and dialogue ...................................................................................................................... 7 2. SECURITY AND JUSTICE SYSTEM ..................................................................................................... 9 Security trends and responses ............................................................................................................ 9 Rule of Law ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Property rights and reduction of backlog ......................................................................................... 13 Access to Justice ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • KFOS LOCAL and INTERNATIONAL VOLUME II.Pdf
    EDITED BY IOANNIS ARMAKOLAS AGON DEMJAHA LOCAL AND AROLDA ELBASANI STEPHANIE SCHWANDNER- SIEVERS INTERNATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF KOSOVO’S STATEHOOD VOLUME II LOCAL AND INTERNATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF KOSOVO’S STATEHOOD —VOLUME II EDITED BY: IOANNIS ARMAKOLAS AGON DEMJAHA AROLDA ELBASANI STEPHANIE SCHWANDNER-SIEVERS Copyright ©2021 Kosovo Foundation for Open Society. All rights reserved. PUBLISHER: Kosovo Foundation for Open Society Imzot Nikë Prelaj, Vila 13, 10000, Prishtina, Kosovo. Issued in print and electronic formats. “Local and International Determinants of Kosovo’s Statehood: Volume II” EDITORS: Ioannis Armakolas Agon Demjaha Arolda Elbasani Stephanie Schwandner-Sievers PROGRAM COORDINATOR: Lura Limani Designed by Envinion, printed by Envinion, on recycled paper in Prishtina, Kosovo. ISBN 978-9951-503-06-8 CONTENTS ABOUT THE EDITORS 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 12 INTRODUCTION 13 CULTURE, HERITAGE AND REPRESENTATIONS 31 — Luke Bacigalupo Kosovo and Serbia’s National Museums: A New Approach to History? 33 — Donjetë Murati and Stephanie Schwandner- Sievers An Exercise in Legitimacy: Kosovo’s Participation at 1 the Venice Biennale 71 — Juan Manuel Montoro Imaginaries and Media Consumptions of Otherness in Kosovo: Memories of the Spanish Civil War, Latin American Telenovelas and Spanish Football 109 — Julianne Funk Lived Religious Perspectives from Kosovo’s Orthodox Monasteries: A Needs Approach for Inclusive Dialogue 145 LOCAL INTERPRETATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL RULES 183 — Meris Musanovic The Specialist Chambers in Kosovo: A Hybrid Court between
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Harassment in Kosovo
    Sexual Harassment in Kosovo By Ariana Qosaj-Mustafa, Adelina Berisha, Nicole Farnsworth, and Iliriana Banjska Kosovo Women’s Network Pristhina, Kosovo 2016 © Kosovo Women’s Network, 2016 Authors: Ariana Qosaj-Mustafa, Adelina Berisha, Nicole Farnsworth, and Iliriana Banjska ISBN 978-9951-8923-1-5 Printed by Night Design in Prishtina, Kosovo, using ecofriendly printing. This research was funded by the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) with the funds of Austrian Development Cooperation. The views presented do not necessarily correspond with the views of the Austrian Development Agency. www.womensnetwork.org Contents Acronyms............................................................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 4 The Legal Framework .................................................................................................................... 4 Perceptions..................................................................................................................................... 4 Extent.............................................................................................................................................. 4 Institutional Response...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Serbian Institutions
    “It is My Dream to Leave This Place” Children with Disabilities in Serbian Institutions Copyright © 2016 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-33603 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org JUNE 2016 ISBN: 978-1-6231-33603 “It is My Dream to Leave This Place” Children with Disabilities in Serbian Institutions Map .................................................................................................................................... I Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1p Life in Institutions .................................................................................................................... 6 Obligations ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Consequences of the Kosovo Conflict on Southeastern Europe
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Southern Methodist University The Consequences of the Kosovo Conflict on Southeastern Europe MARK S. ELLIS* I. Introduction During the initial stage of the Kosovo crisis, the international community held out prom- ises of substantial support to neighboring countries if they stood strong against Serbian aggression. President Clinton spoke about launching a Marshall Plan for Southeastern Eu- rope to help rebuild a region crippled by war.' NATO leaders showered promises of military protection and economic help to Yugoslavia's neighbors for siding with the alliance on Kosovo. In fact, NATO's "direct and real interest" in the security of the neighboring coun- tries caused the alliance to be at "the forefront of the international community in supplying money and material" to these countries.2 To prevent any widening of the conflict, neigh- boring countries received security support from both the international community and NATO. Indeed, the NATO alliance did not hesitate to assure the neighboring countries that it would stand by them throughout the crisis, given their importance to NATO's overall efforts to stabilize the region.' Did the international community keep its promise? Did the region pay an extraordinary price for assisting the alliance in its actions against Belgrade? Can the region fully recover from the Kosovo crisis? This article offers a preliminary assessment of the effects of the Kosovo war on South- eastern Europe and addresses regional reconstruction efforts up to and including the re- cently adopted Stability Pact. Much can be established empirically. For instance, economic performance before and after the war can be measured with relative accuracy.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WARP of the SERBIAN IDENTITY Anti-Westernism, Russophilia, Traditionalism
    HELSINKI COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN SERBIA studies17 THE WARP OF THE SERBIAN IDENTITY anti-westernism, russophilia, traditionalism... BELGRADE, 2016 THE WARP OF THE SERBIAN IDENTITY Anti-westernism, russophilia, traditionalism… Edition: Studies No. 17 Publisher: Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia www.helsinki.org.rs For the publisher: Sonja Biserko Reviewed by: Prof. Dr. Dubravka Stojanović Prof. Dr. Momir Samardžić Dr Hrvoje Klasić Layout and design: Ivan Hrašovec Printed by: Grafiprof, Belgrade Circulation: 200 ISBN 978-86-7208-203-6 This publication is a part of the project “Serbian Identity in the 21st Century” implemented with the assistance from the Open Society Foundation – Serbia. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Open Society Foundation – Serbia. CONTENTS Publisher’s Note . 5 TRANSITION AND IDENTITIES JOVAN KOMŠIĆ Democratic Transition And Identities . 11 LATINKA PEROVIĆ Serbian-Russian Historical Analogies . 57 MILAN SUBOTIĆ, A Different Russia: From Serbia’s Perspective . 83 SRĐAN BARIŠIĆ The Role of the Serbian and Russian Orthodox Churches in Shaping Governmental Policies . 105 RUSSIA’S SOFT POWER DR. JELICA KURJAK “Soft Power” in the Service of Foreign Policy Strategy of the Russian Federation . 129 DR MILIVOJ BEŠLIN A “New” History For A New Identity . 139 SONJA BISERKO, SEŠKA STANOJLOVIĆ Russia’s Soft Power Expands . 157 SERBIA, EU, EAST DR BORIS VARGA Belgrade And Kiev Between Brussels And Moscow . 169 DIMITRIJE BOAROV More Politics Than Business . 215 PETAR POPOVIĆ Serbian-Russian Joint Military Exercise . 235 SONJA BISERKO Russia and NATO: A Test of Strength over Montenegro .
    [Show full text]
  • Geografski Institut „Jovan Cvijić”, SANU (Str.142)
    GEOGRAPHICAL INSTITUTE “JOVAN CVIJIC” SASA JOURNAL OF THE … Vol. 59 № 2 YEAR 2009 911.37(497.11) SETLLEMENTS OF UNDEVELOPED AREAS OF SERBIA Branka Tošić*1, Vesna Lukić**, Marija Ćirković** *Faculty of Geography of the University in Belgrade **Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijic” SASA, Belgrade Abstract: Analytical part of the paper comprises the basic demo–economic, urban–geographic and functional indicators of the state of development, as well as changes in the process of development in the settlements and their centres on undeveloped area of Serbia in the period in which they most appeared. The comparison is made on the basis of complex and modified indicators2, as of undeveloped local territorial units mutually, so with the republic average. The basic aims were presented in the final part of the paper, as well as the strategic measures for the development of settlements on these areas, with a suggestion of activating and valorisation of their spatial potentials. The main directions are defined through the strategic regional documents of Serbia and through regional policy of the European Union. Key words: population, activities, development, settlements, undeveloped areas, Serbia. Introduction The typology and categorisation of municipalities/territorial units with a status of the city, given in the Strategy of the Regional Development of the Republic of Serbia for the period from 2007 to 2012 (Official Register, no. 21/07) served as the basis for analysis and estimation of the settlements in undeveloped areas on the territory of the Republic of Serbia. In that document, 37 municipalities/cities were categorized as underdeveloped (economically undeveloped or demographically endangered municipalities).
    [Show full text]
  • Gender-Based Discrimination and Labour in Kosovo
    Funded by the Co-funded by European Union Swedish Development Cooperation GENDER-BASED DISCRIMINATION AND LABOUR IN KOSOVO Implemented by: GENDER-BASED DISCRIMINATION AND LABOUR IN KOSOVO By Iliriana Banjska, David JJ Ryan, Nicole Farnsworth, Lirika Demiri, Liridona Sijarina and Adelina Tërshani 2019 © Kosovo Women’s Network, 2019 All rights reserved. Licensed to the European Union under conditions. Authors: Iliriana Banjska, David JJ Ryan, Nicole Farnsworth, Lirika Demiri, Liridona Sijarina, and Adelina Tërshani ISBN 978-9951-737-31-9 This publication was produced with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the Kosovo Women’s Network and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. Printed by Night Design in Pristina, Kosovo, using eco-friendly printing. www.womensnetwork.org Acknowledgements The Kosovo Women’s Network (KWN) would like to express its gratitude to the people who were involved in this research and contributed to Kosovo’s first in-depth analysis of gender-based discrimination as it relates to labour. This included citizens and institutions who offered their thoughts and time. The Agency for Gender Equality in the Office of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Kosovo and the Ombudsperson Institution, as associates in this action, provided vital support to KWN’s efforts in confirming interviews with institutions and reaching diverse respondents through the online survey. The Kosovo Judicial Council provided important assistance in scheduling interviews with judges, as did the Labour Inspectorate with labour inspectors throughout Kosovo. KWN thanks its hard-working and dedicated research team who conducted interviews with institutions, coded interviews and drafted sections of this report: Adelina Tërshani, Liridona Sijarina and Lirika Demiri.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Section
    Communicated on 25 June 2014 THIRD SECTION Application no. 5591/10 Milica ĐORĐEVIĆ and others against Serbia and 3 other applications (see list appended) STATEMENT OF FACTS A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. They are all represented by the Belgrade Center for Human Rights, a non-governmental organisation based in Serbia. A. The relevant background An attempt was made on 31 June 2001 to hold a rally intended by its organisers to promote the equality and visibility of lesbian, gay bisexual and transgender population in Serbia (the “Belgrade Pride Parade”) in central Belgrade. This event was violently disrupted and the rally had to be stopped. The next attempt to hold such a rally was made in 2009 (see below). A “Pride Parade” was held in central Belgrade on 10 October 2010 with official permission. While the parade itself was held without incidents, the police had to confront numerous violent opponents who tried to disrupt it. It was reported that more than 100 police officers were injured. No “Pride Parades” have been permitted since. The applications concern the applicants’ attempts to hold “Pride Parades” in 2009, 2011, 2012 and 2013. B. The circumstances of the present cases The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 2 ĐORĐEVIĆ AND OTHERS v. SERBIA AND OTHER APPLICATIONS STATEMENT OF FACTS AND QUESTIONS 1. Pride Parade in Belgrade in 2009 (Application no 5591/10) (a) Introduction The applicants in this case are Ms Milica Đorđević, Mr Dušan Kosanović, Ms Majda Puača, Ms Marija Savić and Ms Dragana Vučković.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Evaluation Report.Pdf
    Fall 08 FINAL EVALUATION Serbia Thematic window Conflict Prevention & Peace Building Programme Title: Promoting Peace Building in Southern Serbia May Prepared by: 2013 A consortium of evaluators under supervision of TARA IC d.o.o, Novi Sad Prologue This final evaluation report has been coordinated by the MDG Achievement Fund joint programme in an effort to assess results at the completion point of the programme. As stipulated in the monitoring and evaluation strategy of the Fund, all 130 programmes, in 8 thematic windows, are required to commission and finance an independent final evaluation, in addition to the programme’s mid-term evaluation. Each final evaluation has been commissioned by the UN Resident Coordinator’s Office (RCO) in the respective programme country. The MDG-F Secretariat has provided guidance and quality assurance to the country team in the evaluation process, including through the review of the TORs and the evaluation reports. All final evaluations are expected to be conducted in line with the OECD Development Assistant Committee (DAC) Evaluation Network “Quality Standards for Development Evaluation”, and the United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG) “Standards for Evaluation in the UN System”. Final evaluations are summative in nature and seek to measure to what extent the joint programme has fully implemented its activities, delivered outputs and attained outcomes. They also generate substantive evidence-based knowledge on each of the MDG-F thematic windows by identifying best practices and lessons learned to be carried forward to other development interventions and policy-making at local, national, and global levels. We thank the UN Resident Coordinator and their respective coordination office, as well as the joint programme team for their efforts in undertaking this final evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • HOW EUROPE WORKS for LGBTI RIGHTS the Serbian Story
    HOW EUROPE WORKS FOR LGBTI RIGHTS The Serbian Story Vuk Raičević Imprint Author Vuk Raičević, Legal Officer at Belgrade Centre for Human Rights Editorial Team Edita Barać-Savić, Michael Roick Layout Dina dizajn Print Manaurta Number of copies 300 Publisher Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom Western Balkans Bulevar Kneza Aleksandra Karadjordjevica 13/A8, 11040 Belgrade, Serbia 00 381 11 3066824 [email protected] http://westbalkan.fnst.org @FNFWesternBalkans @FNFWestbalkans YT /FreedomTVEurope Copyright © 2020 by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom All rights reserved. This article reflects the opinion of the author and does not necessarily represent the position of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom. HOW EUROPE WORKS FOR LGBTI RIGHTS The Serbian Story Contents Foreword ..............................................................................................................................................................................5 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................................7 From the Decriminalisation of Homosexuality to the First (Violent) Pride in Serbia ............................................................................................................................................8 The Rights of LGBTI Persons in Serbia and EU Enlargement Policy ......................................................................10 Serbia’s Accession to the European
    [Show full text]