DOCSLIB.ORG

Report Title

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Danube River Basin District Management Plan – Update 2015 ANNEX DRAFT December 2014 ICPDR / International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org The Danube River Basin District Management Plan – Update 2015 ANNEX List of Annexes Annex 1: Competent Authorities and Weblinks to National RBM Plans in the DRBD Annex 2: Update on DRBD Surface Water Typology Annex 3: Status of Urban Waste Water Infrastructure Annex 4: Industrial Emission Inventories Annex 5: Future Infrastructure Projects Annex 6: Groundwater Annex 7: Inventory of Protected Areas Annex 8: Economic Analysis Annex 9: Progress in Urban Wastewater Treatment Sector Annex 10: Nitrates Vulnerable Zones in the DRBD Annex 11: Overview on agricultural measures Annex 12: Progress on measures addressing hydromorphological alterations ICPDR / International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org Competent authorities and Weblinks to National RBM Plans in the DRB Annex 1 DRAFT DRBM Plan – Update 2015 ICPDR / International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org DRAFT Danube River Basin District Management Plan – Update 2015 Austria Hungary Federal Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment Ministry of Interior and Water Management Jozsef Attila u. 2-4 Stubenring 1 H-1051 Budapest A-1012 Wien Web link: www.kormany.hu/hu/belugyminiszterium Web link: www.bmlfuw.gv.at Web link national RBM Plan: www.euvki.hu; Web link national RBM Plan: http://wisa.bmlfuw.gv.at www.vizeink.hu Bosnia and Herzegovina Moldova Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations Ministry of Ecology, Construction and Territorial Musala 9 Development BiH-71000 Sarajevo 9 Cosmonautilor St. Web link: www.mvteo.gov.ba MD-2005 Chisinau Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Web link: currently no web link available. Forestry Marka Marulica 2BiH-71000 Sarajevo Montenegro Web link: www.fmpvs.gov.ba Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management Rimski Trg 46 of Republika Srpska ME – 81000 Podgorica Trg Republike Srpske 1BiH-78000 Banja Luka Web link: www.minpolj.gov.me Web link: www.vladars.net Romania Bulgaria Ministry of Environment Ministry of Environment and Water 12 Libertatii Blvd., Sector 5 22 Maria-Luisa Blvd. RO-04129 Bucharest BG-1000 Sofia Web link: www.ape-paduri.ro Web link: www.moew.government.bg National Administration “Apele Romane” Danube River Basin Directorate 6 Edgar Quinet St., Sector 1 60, Chataldzha str. RO-010018 Bucharest BG -5800 Pleven Web link: http://www.rowater.ro Web link: www.dunavbd.org Web link national RBM Plan: http://dunavbd.org/index.php?x=204 Serbia Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Nemanjina 22-26 RS-11000 Beograd Croatia Web link: http://www.mpzzs.gov.rs/ Ministry of Agriculture Ulica grada Vukovara 78 HR-10000 Zagreb Slovak Republic Web link: http://www.mps.hr Ministry of the Environment Námestie L’ Stúra 1 SK-81235 Bratislava Web link: www.enviro.gov.sk; www.vuvh.sk/rsv2 Czech Republic Ministry of Environment Vrsovická 65 Slovenia CZ-10010 Praha 10 Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning Web link: www.mzp.cz Dunajska 48 Ministry of Agriculture SI-1000 Ljubljana Tesnov 17 Web link: www.mop.gov.si/en/ CZ-117 05 Praha 1 Web link national RBM Plan: Web link: www.mze.cz http://www.mop.gov.si/si/delovna_podrocja/voda/nacrt_u pravljanja_voda/nuv_besedilni_in_kartografski_del/ Web link PoMs: Germany http://www.mop.gov.si/si/delovna_podrocja/voda/nacrt_u Bavarian State Ministry for Environment and Consumer pravljanja_voda/#c18223 Protection Rosenkavalierplatz 2 Ukraine D-81925 München Ministry for Environmental Protection of Ukraine Web link: www.stmuv.bayern.de/ 35, Uritskogo str. UA-03035 Kyiv Ministry for Environment Baden-Württemberg Kernerplatz 10 State Committee of Ukraine for Water Management D-70182 Stuttgart 8, Chervonoarmiyska Str. Web link: www.um.baden-wuerttemberg.de/ UA-01601 Kyiv Web link: www.menr.gov.ua ICPDR / International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org - 1 - U pdate on DRBD s urface water typolog y Annex 2 DRAFT DRBM Plan – Update 2015 ICPDR / International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org DRAFT Danube River Basin District Management Plan – Update 2015 Typology of the Danube River The typology of the Danube River has been developed in a joint activity by the countries sharing the Danube River for the first DBA in 2004. The Danube typology therefore constitutes a harmonised system used by all these countries. The Danube typology was based on a combination of abiotic factors of System A and System B. The most important factors are ecoregion, mean water slope, substratum composition, geomorphology and water temperature. Ten Danube section types were identified (see Figure 1). The morphological and habitat characteristics are outlined for each section type. In order to ensure that the Danube section types are biologically meaningful, these were validated with biological data collected during the first Joint Danube Survey in 2001. Further details including definition of individual section types are given in the DBA 2013. Figure 1: Danube section types; the dividing lines refer only to the Danube River itself. Typology of the tributaries in the Danube River Basin District The typologies of the Danube tributaries were developed by the countries individually. Stream types relevant on transboundary water courses were bilaterally harmonised with the neighbours. An overview of national surface water typologies is given in the DBA 2013. Most countries in the DRB (Germany, Austria, , Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Croatia, Romania, Bulgaria ) have applied System B (Annex II, 1.2.1 WFD) for establishing their river typology. Only Slovakia and Ukraine have used System A. Countries using System B have used a number of optional factors to further describe the river types. River discharge, mean substratum composition and mean water slope are most frequently used. Table 1 gives an overview of the class boundaries used by the DRB countries for the common descriptors: altitude, catchment area and geology. ICPDR / International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org 2 DRAFT Danube River Basin District Management Plan – Update 2015 Table 1: Obligatory factors used in river typologies (Systems A and B) Descriptor Country Class boundaries Germany 0-200 m 200-800m > 800 m Austria 0-200 m 200-500 m 500-800 m 800-1600 m > 1600 m Czech R. 0-200 m 200-500 m 500-800 m > 800 m Slovak R. 0-200 m 200-500 m 500-800 m > 800 m Hungary 0-200 m 200-350 m > 350 m Croatia 0-200 m 200 - 600 m 600-800 m Slovenia no altitude classes were used in river typology Altitude Serbia 0-200 m 200-500 m > 500 m Romania 0-200 m 200-500 m 500-800 m > 800 m Bulgaria 0-200 m 200-800 m > 800 m Bosnia and < 200 m 200-500 m 500-800 m > 800 m Herzegovina Moldova 0-200 m 200-800m > 800 m Montenegro Ukraine < 200 m 200-500 m 500-800 m > 10,000 Germany 10-100 km² 100-1000 km² 1000-10,000 km² km² 2500- Austria 10-100 km² 100-500 km² 500-1000 km² 1000-2500 km² 10,000 km² Czech R. Not applied anymore Slovak R.1 10-100 km² 100 – 1 000 km² 1000 – 10000 km2 Hungary 10-200 km² 100-2000 km² 1000-12,000 km² > 10,000 km² > 10,000 Croatia 10-100 km2 100-1000 km² 1000-10,000 km² km² Catchment Slovenia <10 km2 10-100 km² 100-1000 km² 1000-10,000 km² > 10,000 km² area > Serbia 10-100 km² 100-1000 km² 1000-4000 km² 4000-10,000 km² 10,000 km² Romania 10-100 km² 100-1000 km² 1000-10,000 km² > 10,000 km² Bulgaria 10-100 km² 100-1000 km² 1000-10,000 km² Bosnia and 4000- <100 km² 100-1000 km² 1000-4000 km² > 10,000 km² Herzegovina 10,000 km² Moldova 10-100 km² 100-1000 km² 1000-10,000 km² > 10,000 km² Montenegro Ukraine 10-100 km² 100-1000 km² 1000-10,000 km² > 10,000 km² Germany siliceous calcareous organic limestone Austria cristalline tertiary and quaternary sediments flysch and helveticum and dolomite Czech R. crystalline and vulcanites sandstones, mudstones and quaternary Slovak R. mixed Hungary siliceous calcareous organic Croatia siliceous calcareous organic mixed Slovenia siliceous calcareous flysch2 Geology Serbia siliceous calcareous organic Romania siliceous calcareous organic Bulgaria siliceous calcareous organic mixed Bosnia and siliceous calcareous organic Herzegovina Moldova siliceous calcareous organic Montenegro Ukraine siliceous calcareous organic 1 The river typology is not based on strict boundaries of catchment area. Rivers > 1,000 km² make up individual types; definition of types for smaller rivers is based on ecoregion, altitude and geology. 2 not for the tributaries in the Danube river basin district ICPDR / International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org 3 DRAFT Danube River Basin District Management Plan – Update 2015 Lakes In total, four lakes were reported at the DRB overview level: Neusiedler/Fertö-to (Austria/Hungary), Balaton (Hungary), Ialpug (Ukraine) and Razim/Razelm (Romania). Information is provided in Table 2. Further details of the lake typology are given in the DBA 2013. Table 2: Lakes selected for the basin-wide overview and their types Altitude Lakes > 100 km2 Country(s) Type of lake Ecoregion Depth class Size class Geology class large shallow, Neusiedler See / lowland: AT, HU salinic steppe- 11 < 3 m > 100 km² calcareous Fertő-tó < 200 m type lake very large shallow lowland: Lake Balaton HU 11 3-15 m > 100 km² calcareous steppe-type < 200 m lake Ozero Ialpug UA n.a. 12 n.a. n.a. > 100 km² n.a.
Recommended publications
  • (Verts/ALE) Y David Hammerstein Mintz (Verts/ALE) a La Comisión

    (Verts/ALE) Y David Hammerstein Mintz (Verts/ALE) a La Comisión

    PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-1166/07 de Elly de Groen-Kouwenhoven (Verts/ALE) y David Hammerstein Mintz (Verts/ALE) a la Comisión Asunto:Exclusión de Palakaria de la lista Natura 2000 El 15 de febrero de 2007, el Gobierno de Bulgaria excluyó de la lista Natura 2000 muchas de las zonas silvestres más famosas del país. Una de ellas es la de Palakaria. Está situada en el sur de Bulgaria, entre los montes de Vitosha y Rila. Abarca la parte occidental de la caldera de Samokov-Palakaria y el valle del río Palakaria. Su límite occidental se extiende por las laderas de los montes de Vitosha y Verila en el municipio de Yarlovo y por el este llega al río Iskar y a la villa de Samokov. Palakaria da cobijo a 104 especies de aves reproductoras, 4 de las cuales constan en el Libro Rojo de Datos sobre Bulgaria (1985). De las aves que pueden encontrarse en este territorio, son 37 las especies con un estado de conservación desfavorable (catalogadas como Species of European Conservation Concern, o SPEC) (BirdLife International, 2004), de las cuales 1 pertenece a la categoría SPEC 1 por estar amenazada en todo el mundo, 15 a SPEC 2 y 21 a SPEC 3, por ser especies amenazadas en Europa. La zona acoge hábitats apropiados para 15 especies que necesitan medidas de conservación especiales, incluidas en el anexo 2 de la Ley de biodiversidad y también en el anexo I de la Directiva sobre aves. La zona presenta la población reproductora más densa de cigüeña blanca (Ciconia ciconia) de Bulgaria.
  • From Urban Geodiversity to Geoheritage: the Case of Ljubljana (Slovenia)

    From Urban Geodiversity to Geoheritage: the Case of Ljubljana (Slovenia)

    Jure Tičar eT al. QUAESTIONES GEOGRAPHICAE 36(3) • 2017 FROM URBAN GEODIVERSITY TO GEOHERITAGE: THE CASE OF LJUBLJANA (SLOVENIA) Jure Tičar, Blaž Komac, maTiJa Zorn, maTeJa FerK, mauro HrvaTin, roK ciglič Anton Melik Geographical Institute, Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Ljubljana, Slovenia Manuscript received: March 31, 2017 Revised version: June 19, 2017 Tičar J., Komac B., Zorn M., FerK M., HrvaTin M., ciglič R., 2017. From urban geodiversity to geoheritage: the case of Ljubljana (Slovenia). Quaestiones Geographicae 36(3), Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, pp. 37–50. 7 figs, 1 table. aBsTracT: The city of Ljubljana lies at the intersection of various geomorphological regions that have strongly influ- enced its spatial organization. Prehistoric settlements were built on marshland, a Roman town was built on the first river terrace of the Ljubljanica River, and in the Middle Ages a town was built in a strategic position between the Lju- bljanica River and Castle Hill. The modern city absorbed all usable space between the nearby hills. This paper reviews some relief features in Ljubljana, their influence on the city’s spatial development, and urban geoheritage. The results indicate new possibilities for urban geoheritage tourism in the Slovenian capital and its surroundings. Key words: geoheritage, geomorphology, urbanization, spatial growth, Ljubljana Corresponding author: Jure Tičar, [email protected] Introduction connecting the diversity of geomorphological and geological elements with their interpretation During the 1990s, geologists and geomorphol- and recreation (Necheş 2016). Consenquently ogists started using the term geodiversity to de- many geoparks dedicated to protect and to pro- scribe the diversity of nonliving nature (Sharples mote the nonliving elements of nature are being 1993, Wiedenbein 1994, Zwolinski 2004).
  • River Names As a Testament of Cultural Heritage

    River Names As a Testament of Cultural Heritage

    ONOMÀSTICA 5 (2019): 65–89 | RECEPCIÓ 28.10.2019 | ACCEPTACIÓ 28.11.2019 River names as a testament of cultural heritage (on hydronyms in the Iskar river basin) Anna Choleva-Dimitrova Department of Onomastics Institute for Bulgarian Language, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences [email protected] Abstract: River names are some of the oldest -onyms on record. The article examines 170 river names from the basin of the Iskar river – the largest tributary of the Danube in Bulgaria. The origin and significance of river names emerge through the application of traditional onomastic methods – onomastic (etymological) analysis and onomastic reconstruction. Comparative onomastic data from adjacent and more distant regions in Bulgaria and the Balkans are also drawn on. Conclusions about the relative antiquity of the hydronyms are drawn. Key words: river name, hydronym, Iskar river, Danube river, tributary of a river Els noms dels rius com a llegat del patrimoni cultural (Sobre hidrònims a la conca del riu Iskar) Resum: Els noms dels rius, o topònims fluvials, són uns dels noms més antics de què es té notícia. L’article examina 170 noms de rius de la conca del riu Iskar —el major afluent del Danubi a Bulgària. Tractem d’aclarir l’origen i la significació d’aquests noms a partir de l’aplicació de mètodes onomàstics tradicionals: anàlisi etimològica i reconstrucció onomàstica. També es recullen dades onomàstiques comparatives de regions de Bulgària i dels Balcans, més properes i més llunyanes. Proposem algunes conclusions sobre l’antiguitat relativa dels hidrònims. Paraules clau: nom de riu, hidrònim, riu Iskar, riu Danubi, afluent d’un riu 1 Introduction Hydronymy is one of the most important branches of onomastics.
  • Južnoslovenski Filolog

    Južnoslovenski Filolog

    ЈУЖНОСЛОВЕНСКИ ФИЛОЛОГ ПОВРЕМЕНИ СПИС ЗА СЛОВЕНСКУ ФИЛОЛОГИЈУ И ЛИНГВИСТИКУ УРЕЂУЈЕ А. БЕЛИЋ УЗ СТАЛНУ САРАДЊУ г. г. А. МЕЈЕ-А, проф. Collège de France, A. CTОЈИЋЕВИЋА, проф. Унив. у Љубљани, К. ЊИЧА, проф. Унив. у Кракову, Љ. СТОЈAНОВИЋА, акад. у Београду, М. РЕШЕТАРА, проф. Унив. у Загребу, О. ХУЈЕРА, проф. Унив. у Прагу, Р. НАХТИГАЛА, проф. Унив. у Љубљани, СТ. ИBШИЋА, проф. Унив. у Загребу, СТ. М. КУЉВАКИНА, проф. Унив. у Београду, ФР. ИЛЕШИЋА, проф. Унив. у Загребу, ФР. РАМОВША, проф. Унив. у Љубљани и Х. БAРИЋА, проф. Унив. у Београду. КЊИГА III. ШТАМПАЊЕ ОВЕ КЊИГЕ ПОТПОМОГНУТО ЈЕ ИЗ ЗАДУЖБИНА СРП. КР, АКАДЕМИЈЕ: арх. НИЋИФОРА ДУЧИЋА и Д-ра. ЉУБ. РАДИВОЈЕВИЋА. БЕОГРАД, 1922–1923. : г САДРЖАЈ ШЋЕ КЊИГЕ. -о-до-ко Расправе. стpд М. Решетар: Završetak -u u gen. sing. muških imenica u slovenskom jeziku . 1–6 Лbуб. Стојановић: Реченичне конструкције без verbum-a finitum-a . 7–10 Dr. Franjo Fancev : О avtorstvu i postanju rječnika „Lexicon latinum . Zagrabiae 1742“ . 11–25 Г. Ил њи н скi W : Књ зтимологiи имени chrbrvatЋ „Хорватњ“ . 36—30 А. Белић: О промени ст. слов. кли „фиi“ . 31–34 Dr. Nikola Majnarić: Jedna zanimljiva pojava u ravnogorskom narječju . 35–40 П. К. Булат: Из живота речи . 41–47 Др. Ст. Куљбаки н: Акценатска питања . 48—70 Прилози. 1. Ivan Koštial: Stsl. zajeсњ . 71—72 2. P. Skok: Iz srpskohrvatske toponomastike . 72—77 3. В. Зрнић: Неколико ситних прилога . 78 4. А. Белић: Двојица, неколицина и слична обра зовања . 79—81 5. Ђуро Шкарић: Јужнословенска ријечца „ве“ 81—83 6. Dr. Fr. Ilešić: Slovenske „etimologije“ .
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999

    FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999

    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
  • Godišnji Financijski Izvještaji Hrvatskih Voda Za 2020. Godinu

    Godišnji Financijski Izvještaji Hrvatskih Voda Za 2020. Godinu

    HRVATSKE VODE Godišnji financijski izvještaji za 2020. godinu UVODNE NAPOMENE Hrvatske vode su pravna osoba za upravljanje vodama koja je počela djelovati 1. srpnja 1996. godine kao pravni slijednik Javnog vodoprivrednog poduzeća Hrvatska vodoprivreda sukladno članku 200. stavka I.Zakona o vodama (N.N. 107/95.) Hrvatske vode su sukladno Zakonu o vodama ustrojene i registrirane kod Trgovačkog suda u Zagrebu kao ustanova čiji je osnivač Republika Hrvatska. Sukladno zakonski determiniranom pravnom statusu Hrvatske vode posluju kao neprofitna organizacija. Člankom 186. Zakona o vodama (N.N. 153/09, 63/11, 130/11, 56/13, 14/14, 46/18) regulirana je djelatnost Hrvatskih voda te su određeni poslovi Hrvatskih voda od kojih su najvažniji: - izrada planskih dokumenata za upravljanje vodama, - izrada projektnih zadataka, koncepcijskih rješenja, studija i investicijskih programa, - uređenje voda i zaštita od štetnog djelovanja voda, - investitorski poslovi u gradnji i održavanju građevina za osnovnu melioracijsku odvodnju; nadzor nad građenjem i održavanjem građevina; - upravljanje kakvoćom voda, provedba monitoringa površinskih, uključivo i priobalnih voda i podzemnih voda, - upravljanje projektima gradnje građevina za navodnjavanje u vlasništvu jedinica područne (regionalne) samouprave sukladno nacionalnim programima i projektima; sufinanciranje gradnje, - upravljanje javnim vodnim dobrom, - vođenje vodne dokumentacije i jedinstvenoga informacijskog sustava voda te izdavanje vodopravnih akata, - stručni poslovi u vezi s davanjem koncesija, - stručni nadzor nad provođenjem uvjeta iz vodopravnih akata i koncesijskih uvjeta, - obračun i naplata naknada za koncesije za gospodarsko korištenje voda, - obračun i naplata vodnih naknada, - upravljanje posebnim projektima. Zakonski okvir za izradu temeljnih financijskih izvještaja Zaključno sa 31.12. 2015. Hrvatske vode su svoje poslovanje vodile sukladno Uredbi o računovodstvu neprofitnih organizacija (Nar.nov.
  • Modelling Flow of Subterranean Pivka River in Postojnska Jama, Slovenia Modeliranje Toka Podzemeljske Pivke V Postojnski Jami, Slovenija

    Modelling Flow of Subterranean Pivka River in Postojnska Jama, Slovenia Modeliranje Toka Podzemeljske Pivke V Postojnski Jami, Slovenija

    COBISS: 1.02 Modelling floW of subterranean Pivka river in Postojnska jama, Slovenia Modeliranje toka podzemeljske Pivke V Postojnski jami, Slovenija Georg Kaufmann1, Franci Gabrovšek2 & Janez TURK3 Abstract UDC 556.32:551.44(497.471) Izvleček UDK 556.32:551.44(497.471) Georg Kaufmann, Franci Gabrovšek, Janez Turk: Modelling Georg Kaufmann, Franci Gabrovšek, Janez Turk: Modeliranje cave flow hydraulics in Postojnska jama, Slovenia toka podzemeljske Pivke v Postojnski jami, Slovenija The sub-surface flow path through the Postojnska jama cave Z avtomatskimi merilniki in registratorji podatkov smo sprem- system has been monitored with 7 stations distributed along ljali podzemni tok Pivke v Postojnski jami na sedmih točkah the flow path, monitoring stage and temperature.W e have used med ponorom in odtočnim sifonom v Pivki jami. Podatke the stage data to model flow through the cave system with the nivojev in pretoka smo obravnavali z modelom EPA SWMM, program package SWMM, simulating the active parts of Pos- s katerim smo simulirali tok v poenostavljeni geometriji ka- tojnska jama with simplified geometry. From the comparison nalov. S primerjavo med opazovanji in modelskimi rezultati of stage observations and predictions, we identified key sec- smo določili ključne odseke (podore, zožitve, sifone, obtoke), tions in the cave, which control the sub-surface flow, such as ki najbolj vplivajo na dinamiko toka podzemne Pivke. Glavne passage constrictions, sumps and by-passes. Using a formal parametre teh odsekov smo določili z inverzno metodo, ki te- inverse procedure, we determined the geometry of this key sec- melji na algoritmu soseske (Neighbourhood algorithm, NA) in tions by fitting predicted to observed stages, and we achieved a pri tem dobili odlično ujemanje med modelom in podatki.
  • 4.3 Guidance Document on Measures for Flood Protection

    4.3 Guidance Document on Measures for Flood Protection

    Guidance d ocument on the integrated assessment of existing and planned civil engineering measures for flood protection Disclaimer This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication EU IPA 2010 TWINNING PROJECT are the sole responsibility of the implementing partners “Development of Flood Hazard Maps and Flood Risk Maps” and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the Twinning No: HR/2010/IB/EN/01 European Union http://twinning.voda.hr guidance document on the integrated assessment of existing and planned civil engineering 2 measures for flood protection This document is also available in Croatian language March 2014 guidance document on the integrated assessment of existing and planned civil engineering 3 measures for flood protection Table of content Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Definitions ........................................................................................................................................... 7 2. A typology of measures....................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Why do we need a typology?.............................................................................................. 8 2.2 Cascades of measures ......................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Overview
  • Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of

    Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of

    Strasbourg, 15 March 2012 CDL-REF(2012)003 Opinion No. 662 / 2012 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ACT CCIII OF 2011 ON THE ELECTIONS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT OF HUNGARY This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2012)003 - 2 - The Parliament - relying on Hungary’s legislative traditions based on popular representation; - guaranteeing that in Hungary the source of public power shall be the people, which shall pri- marily exercise its power through its elected representatives in elections which shall ensure the free expression of the will of voters; - ensuring the right of voters to universal and equal suffrage as well as to direct and secret bal- lot; - considering that political parties shall contribute to creating and expressing the will of the peo- ple; - recognising that the nationalities living in Hungary shall be constituent parts of the State and shall have the right ensured by the Fundamental Law to take part in the work of Parliament; - guaranteeing furthermore that Hungarian citizens living beyond the borders of Hungary shall be a part of the political community; in order to enforce the Fundamental Law, pursuant to Article XXIII, Subsections (1), (4) and (6), and to Article 2, Subsections (1) and (2) of the Fundamental Law, hereby passes the following Act on the substantive rules for the elections of Hungary’s Members of Parliament: 1. Interpretive provisions Section 1 For the purposes of this Act: Residence: the residence defined by the Act on the Registration of the Personal Data and Resi- dence of Citizens; in the case of citizens without residence, their current addresses.
  • CLIMATIC REGIONS of KOSOVO and METOHIJA Radomir Ivanović

    CLIMATIC REGIONS of KOSOVO and METOHIJA Radomir Ivanović

    UNIVERSITY THOUGHT doi:10.5937/univtho6-10409 Publication in Natural Sciences, Vol. 6, No 1, 2016, pp. 49-54. Original Scientific Paper CLIMATIC REGIONS OF KOSOVO AND METOHIJA Radomir Ivanović1, Aleksandar Valjarević1, Danijela Vukoičić1, Dragan Radovanović1 1Faculty of Science and Mathematics, University of Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia. ABSTRACT The following the average and extreme values mountainous parts of Kosovo. It affects parts of of climatic elements, specific climatic indices and northern Metohija, Drenica and the entire Kosovo field research, we can select three climatic types in valley along with smaller sidelong dells - Malo Kosovo and Metohija - the altered Mediterranean, Kosovo and Kosovsko Pomoravlje. Because of their continental and mountainous type. The altered exquisite heights, the mountains that complete the Mediterranean type is present in southern and Kosovo Metohija Valley have a specific climatic western Metohija, to be specific, it affects the type, at their lower slopes it is sub - mountainous Prizren Field, the Suva Reka and Orahovac Valley and at the higher ones it is typically mountainous. as well as the right bank of the Beli Drim from Within these climatic types, several climatic sub Pećka Bistrica to the Serbia - Albania border. regions are present. Their frontiers are not precise Gradually and practically unnoticeably, it or sharp. Rather, their climatic changes are transforms itself into a moderate continental type gradual and moderate from one sub-region to the which dominates over the remaining valley and other. Key words: Climatic regions, climatic sub-regions, Kosovo and Metohija. 1. INTRODUCTION The climatic regional division of Kosovo and good, but anyway it offers the possibilities of Metohija has been made following the previous observing Kosovo and Metohija climate.
  • UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order Online

    UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order Online

    UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order online Table of Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Glossary 1. Executive Summary The 1999 Offensive The Chain of Command The War Crimes Tribunal Abuses by the KLA Role of the International Community 2. Background Introduction Brief History of the Kosovo Conflict Kosovo in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Kosovo in the 1990s The 1998 Armed Conflict Conclusion 3. Forces of the Conflict Forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Yugoslav Army Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs Paramilitaries Chain of Command and Superior Responsibility Stucture and Strategy of the KLA Appendix: Post-War Promotions of Serbian Police and Yugoslav Army Members 4. march–june 1999: An Overview The Geography of Abuses The Killings Death Toll,the Missing and Body Removal Targeted Killings Rape and Sexual Assault Forced Expulsions Arbitrary Arrests and Detentions Destruction of Civilian Property and Mosques Contamination of Water Wells Robbery and Extortion Detentions and Compulsory Labor 1 Human Shields Landmines 5. Drenica Region Izbica Rezala Poklek Staro Cikatovo The April 30 Offensive Vrbovac Stutica Baks The Cirez Mosque The Shavarina Mine Detention and Interrogation in Glogovac Detention and Compusory Labor Glogovac Town Killing of Civilians Detention and Abuse Forced Expulsion 6. Djakovica Municipality Djakovica City Phase One—March 24 to April 2 Phase Two—March 7 to March 13 The Withdrawal Meja Motives: Five Policeman Killed Perpetrators Korenica 7. Istok Municipality Dubrava Prison The Prison The NATO Bombing The Massacre The Exhumations Perpetrators 8. Lipljan Municipality Slovinje Perpetrators 9. Orahovac Municipality Pusto Selo 10. Pec Municipality Pec City The “Cleansing” Looting and Burning A Final Killing Rape Cuska Background The Killings The Attacks in Pavljan and Zahac The Perpetrators Ljubenic 11.
  • Review of Research on Plitvice Lakes, Croatia in the Fields of Meteorology, Climatology, Hydrology, Hydrogeochemistry and Physical Limnology

    Review of Research on Plitvice Lakes, Croatia in the Fields of Meteorology, Climatology, Hydrology, Hydrogeochemistry and Physical Limnology

    GEOFIZIKA VOL. 35 2018 DOI: 10.15233/gfz.2018.35.9 Review paper Review of research on Plitvice Lakes, Croatia in the fields of meteorology, climatology, hydrology, hydrogeochemistry and physical limnology Zvjezdana Bencetić Klaić 1, Josip Rubinić 2 and Sanja Kapelj 3 1 Department of Geophysics, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb 2 Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Rijeka 3 Faculty of Geotehnical Engineering, University of Zagreb Received 16 April 2018, in final form 22 October 2018 In lakes, several physical, chemical, and biological processes occur simulta- neously, and these processes are interconnected. Therefore, the investigation of lakes requires a multidisciplinary approach that includes physics (including the physics of the atmosphere, i.e., meteorology), chemistry, geology, hydrogeology, hydrology and biology. Each of these disciplines addresses a lake from a different point of view. However, lake studies that primarily belong to one field, at least to some extent, report their findings in ways that are associated with other fields; this type of reporting is caused by the inherent interconnections between phe- nomena from different disciplines. Plitvice Lakes, Croatia, are composed of a unique cascading chain of karst lakes, and these lakes have been investigated by numerous authors. Here, we provide an overview of the studies of the Plitvice Lakes Area (PLA) that address meteorology, climatology, hydrology, hydrogeo- chemistry and physical limnology. Our aim is to synthesize the results from each of these disciplines and make them available to scientists from other related disciplines; thus, this review will facilitate further investigations of the PLA within the natural sciences. In addition, valuable results from early investiga- tions of Plitvice Lakes are generally unavailable to the broader scientific com- munity, and are written in Croatian.