DEFENDANTS' BRIEF on REMAND Dorman Walker Balch & Bingham LLP Post Office Box 78 Montgomery, AL 36101-0078 Telephone: 334

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DEFENDANTS' BRIEF on REMAND Dorman Walker Balch & Bingham LLP Post Office Box 78 Montgomery, AL 36101-0078 Telephone: 334 Case 2:12-cv-00691-WKW-MHT-WHP Document 263 Filed 07/24/15 Page 1 of 178 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ALABAMA LEGISLATIVE BLACK ) CAUCUS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) CASE NO. 2:12-CV-691 v. ) (Three-Judge Court) ) THE STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________________ ALABAMA DEMOCRATIC ) CONFERENCE, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) CASE NO. 2:12-CV-1081 v. ) (Three-Judge Court) ) THE STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) DEFENDANTS’ BRIEF ON REMAND Dorman Walker LUTHER STRANGE Balch & Bingham LLP Attorney General of Alabama Post Office Box 78 Montgomery, AL 36101-0078 Andrew L. Brasher Telephone: 334-834-6500 Solicitor General [email protected] Megan Kirkpatrick Counsel for Defendants-Intervenors, Jim Deputy Solicitor General McClendon, Gerald Dial and Randy Davis James W. Davis Misty Fairbanks Messick John J. Park, Jr. Assistant Attorneys General Deputy Attorney General Office of the Attorney General Strickland Brockington Lewis LLP State of Alabama 1170 Peachtree Street NE, Ste 2200 Post Office Box 300152 Atlanta, GA 30309 Montgomery, AL 36130-0152 Telephone: 678-347-2200 Telephone: 334-242-7300 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for the State Defendants [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for State Defendants Case 2:12-cv-00691-WKW-MHT-WHP Document 263 Filed 07/24/15 Page 2 of 178 David B. Byrne, Jr. Office of the Governor 600 Dexter Avenue, Suite NB-05 Montgomery, AL 36130 Telephone: 334-242-7120 [email protected] Algert S. Agricola, Jr. Ryals, Donaldson & Agricola, P.C. 60 Commerce Street, Suite 1400 Montgomery, AL 36104 Telephone: 334-834-5290 [email protected] Counsel for Governor Bentley Case 2:12-cv-00691-WKW-MHT-WHP Document 263 Filed 07/24/15 Page 3 of 178 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Authorities ...................................................................................................... vi Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Argument .................................................................................................. 2 I. Racial Predominance .......................................................................................... 2 II. Strict Scrutiny ..................................................................................................... 4 III. Senate Districts ................................................................................................... 6 IV. House Districts .................................................................................................... 8 Argument: Racial Predominance ................................................................................ 11 I. The plaintiffs must prove that the Legislature placed a substantial number of persons in a district because of their race, even though race- neutral districting principles would require that they be placed elsewhere ........................................................................................................... 11 II. The plaintiffs fail to establish racial predominance as a general matter ....... 16 A. The plaintiffs have not produced a map of all districts or any districts that complies with the drafters’ race-neutral districting criteria and creates greater racial balance ........................................... 17 B. The Legislature’s decision to adopt a maximum population deviation of ±1% was a permissible, race-neutral, “background” decision, not evidence of a racial gerrymander ..................................... 23 C. County splitting, in general, is not evidence of a racial gerrymander ........................................................................................... 27 D. The percentage of black population of each district does not establish a racial gerrymander .............................................................. 30 1. As a factual matter, the percentage target was not applied “mechanically” in derogation of other redistricting criteria ...... 31 2. The percentage of black population in a district can just as well be explained by race-neutral criteria ............................. 33 E. Precinct splitting is not evidence of a racial gerrymander ................... 36 i Case 2:12-cv-00691-WKW-MHT-WHP Document 263 Filed 07/24/15 Page 4 of 178 1. There are good reasons to split precincts that have nothing to do with race ................................................................ 36 2. There is no pattern that raises an inference that race is the reason for precinct splits as a general matter ...................... 37 3. Unsplitting precincts shows that precinct splits have a negligible effect on a district’s racial composition ...................... 40 Argument: Strict Scrutiny ........................................................................................... 45 I. The State has a compelling interest in complying with Section 2 and Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act .................................................................... 45 II. The State’s districts are narrowly tailored ...................................................... 48 A. There is no alternative proposal to meet the undisputed requirements of the Voting Rights Act .................................................. 48 B. 65% black districts are reasonably necessary to comply with the Voting Rights Act ................................................................................... 53 1. The record shows that black political leaders supported districts that are approximately 65% black ............................... 54 2. Courts have concluded that 65% percent is an appropriate threshold to maintain the ability to elect ................................... 56 3. Other States and local governments have been sued under Section 2 for reducing majority-black districts below 70% black ............................................................................................. 59 4. The plaintiffs’ own expert has opined that majority-black districts in Alabama should be at least 62% black to give black voters an equal opportunity to elect under Section 2 ....... 61 Argument: Individual Districts ................................................................................... 63 I. Senate Districts ................................................................................................. 63 A. Birmingham (SDs 18, 19, and 20) ......................................................... 63 1. The incumbent senators drew the Birmingham Senate districts. ....................................................................................... 64 2. The evidence does not establish that the drafters subordinated race-neutral criteria to hit a “target.” ................. 65 ii Case 2:12-cv-00691-WKW-MHT-WHP Document 263 Filed 07/24/15 Page 5 of 178 3. The evidence does not establish that the drafters split precincts on the basis of race or that, if they did, such splitting was (1) inconsistent with race-neutral criteria or (2) affected a substantial number of voters ............................... 68 4. SD18, SD19, and SD20 satisfy strict scrutiny............................ 69 B. West Black Belt (SD 23 and SD24) ....................................................... 70 1. These districts were underpopulated, and geography and incumbent wishes limited the drafters’ options for adding population .................................................................................... 70 2. The evidence does not establish that the drafters subordinated race-neutral criteria to hit a “target.” .................. 72 3. The evidence does not establish that the drafters split counties on the basis of race ........................................................ 74 4. The evidence does not establish that the drafters split precincts in contravention of race-neutral principles ................ 76 5. SD23 and SD24 satisfy strict scrutiny........................................ 77 C. Montgomery (SD 26) .............................................................................. 78 1. SD26’s shape and population percentages result from the application of race-neutral criteria ............................................. 78 2. The black population percentage of SD26 results from Montgomery’s demographics and does not support plaintiffs’ racial gerrymandering claim ...................................... 83 3. Additional evidence submitted on remand confirms that the drafters did not subordinate race-neutral considerations. ............................................................................. 86 4. Precinct splits do not show that race predominated .................. 88 5. SD26 satisfies strict scrutiny ...................................................... 88 D. East Black Belt (SD 28) ......................................................................... 90 1. The drafters made only a few changes to SD28, in cooperation with the incumbent.................................................. 90 iii Case 2:12-cv-00691-WKW-MHT-WHP Document 263 Filed 07/24/15 Page 6 of 178 2. The black population percentage has remained constant over the years and is consistent across alternative plans, reflecting the demographics of the area ..................................... 93 3. Unsplitting precincts does not significantly change the black population percentage ......................................................
Recommended publications
  • Session Focus Is Jobs, Small Business Retailers' Legislative Agenda Moving Along W Ith New Republican Majority Priorities Sales Tax Fairness Survey
    Friday, March 04, 2011 Session Focus is Jobs, Small Business Retailers' Legislative Agenda Moving Along w ith New Republican Majority Priorities Sales Tax Fairness Survey In the first week of the 2011 regular legislative session, the Tell your Rep to vote 'Yes' new Republican-majority Alabama Legislature moved most on late fee bill of the bills included in its "Handshake with Alabama," as well as two bills in the Alabama Retail Association's 2011 Tell congressmen to keep swipe fee reforms legislative agenda, into position to be debated next week. E-911 fee bill offers 4% Elements of the ARA agenda that already received collection allowance committee approval are a proposed increase in late fees on consumer credit transactions and an increase in the tax ARA member testifies deduction for small businesses providing health insurance infavor of health insurance for their employees. deduction Immigration bill up for "This is a committee vote conservative, pro- business U.S. House votes to repeal 1099 requirement Legislature," said House Speaker Handshake with Alabama Mike Hubbard, R- moving Auburn, (at Orr would allow locals to right), the former exempt food from sales tax GOP chairman who led his party in November to take control of the Alabama Legislature for the first time since Some want PSE products to Reconstruction. The session's priorities will be creating jobs be prescription only and helping small businesses, Hubbard told business 'Bath Salts' now controlled interests. "Any bill that doesn't create jobs or help the substance economy goes down on the priority list," he said. To that end, the Legislature gave committee approval to eight of the nine Senator attempts to regulate rebates bills included in the Republican "Handshake with Alabama," issues the party promised to address if voters elected its Incentives offered for candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Water and Land Resource Use by Oluwagbemiga
    The Economics of Water and Land Resource Use by Oluwagbemiga Abiodun Ojumu A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama December 18, 2009 Keywords: Recreational fishing, Negative binomial, Economic impact, Recreation demand, Bio-economic, Optimization model Copyright 2009 by Oluwagbemiga Abiodun Ojumu Approved by Diane Hite, Co-Chair, Professor of Agricultural and Resource Economics Deacue Fields, Co-Chair, Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics Asheber Abebe, Associate Professor of Mathematics and Statistics Valentina Hartarska, Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics Abstract Natural resource economics deals with the supply, demand, and the management of the earth’s natural resources. It brings together different broad areas in human economics, earth science, and natural ecosystems to create better understanding of the natural resources in order o develop sustainable ways of managing them to ensure their availability to future generations. Natural resources provide services that respond to market forces, but the right mix of these resources have to be employed in order to optimize the value that they provide. This dissertation focuses on the economics of water and land resources, using economic and biophysical models to show how these resources can be better used to optimize the services that they provide. To do this, this dissertation uses three essays. The first essay uses survey responses from randomly selected anglers in the 2006/2007 recreational fishing season in Alabama in a travel cost model to estimate their consumer surpluses and total willingness to pay for this type of recreation. With some contingent valuation questions in the survey, used with the travel cost model, the study shows that anglers’ willingness to pay for recreational visits will increase if the quality of the recreational fishing sites are improved.
    [Show full text]
  • Component #1: Data Analysis Stakeholder Involvement the Special Education Services (SES) Section of the Alabama State Department
    Component #1: Data Analysis Stakeholder Involvement The Special Education Services (SES) Section of the Alabama State Department of Education (ALSDE) elicited broad stakeholder input to develop the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP). With the assistance of stakeholders who represented parents, advocacy organizations, public and private school personnel, institutions of higher education (IHEs), multiple offices within the ALSDE, and other state agency staff, the SES Section has collected and analyzed performance data for students with individualized education programs (IEPs) in order to identify a state- identified measurable result (SIMR) pursuant to the new Indicator 17 requirement from the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP). The data analyzed include information from the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR) indicators as well as compliance monitoring data, 618 data collections, and other state-reported data (e.g., EDFacts submitted data) over the past several years. The ALSDE staff with broad stakeholder input examined data from the SPP/APR indicators and 618 data collections in order to determine longitudinal trends and patterns. While Alabama has met and exceeded most of its SPP/APR targets for the past several years, particularly within compliance indicators, the ALSDE acknowledges that the need for improvement in results areas is clearly indicated. In data drill-down activities, the ALSDE staff and stakeholders determined key areas to consider: improving graduation rates, narrowing the achievement
    [Show full text]
  • What Will It Take to Make Alabama's
    TABLE OF CONTENTS BCA Information Building The Best Business Climate 02 A Letter to Alabama Businesses 18 BCA's ProgressPac: Elect, Defend, Defeat, and Recruit 04 2017 Legislative Action Summary 20 Education: A Better Workforce Starts in the Classroom 05 Why Invest in BCA? 22 Infrastructure: Alabama's Arteries of Commerce 06 National Partnerships 24 Manufacturing: Building the State's Economy 07 State Partnerships 26 Labor and Employment: Alabama's Vibrant and Productive 08 BCA 2018 Board of Directors Workforce is No Accident 10 BCA Professional Team 28 Judicial and Legal Reform: Fairness and Efficiency 11 BCA Leadership for all Alabamians 12 Alabama Legislators 29 Environment and Energy: A Healthy Environment is 14 Federal Affairs Good for Business 16 BCA 2018 Events Calendar 30 Health Care: Alabama can Lead the Nation We represent more than 1 million 31 Tax and Fiscal Policy: Fairness and Consistency are Keys to Growth 32 Small Business: The Economic Engine of Alabama working Alabamians and their ability to provide for themselves, their families, and their communities. 1 PERSPECTIVE'18 education and works to serve students and parents. We work to ensure that students receive the appropriate education and skill-training and we look forward to working with the Legislature to accomplish a fair and equitable business environment that includes sound education policies. By working together, Alabama's business community and health care community, including physicians, nurses, hospitals, nursing homes, insurance carriers, and other health care providers and professionals, can inform each other and policy makers about how best to solve the problems facing those who access the health care system and marketplace.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Government Affairs Annual Report
    2018 GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS ANNUAL REPORT Regions engages in all levels of public policy advocacy on behalf of the company, our employees, our shareholders and our customers. Part of that advocacy includes engagement in the electoral process through the use of legally permissible corporate political contributions. Included in this report is the Regions Policy on Political Contributions, a list of contributions made between January 1 and December 31, 2018, and a list of the portion of our trade association dues that are attributable to lobbying expenses for those associations where our dues and other payments exceed $25,000 annually. REGIONS POLICY ON POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS Philosophy This Policy on Political Contributions (“Policy”) and the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (“Code of Conduct”) have been approved by the Executive Officers to govern and promote the highest standards of behavior by our company and our associates with regard to political activities and to ensure compliance with all current applicable federal and state campaign finance laws. Like most public companies however, Regions recognizes that decisions made by governmental agencies and lawmakers can have a significant impact on our company, our operations, our stockholders, customers and associates. Accordingly, we monitor, track and express our views to lawmakers and regulators on a variety of issues that affect our business. The political contributions are made to candidates and organizations that share Regions' business principles and objectives without regard for the private political preferences of executives and not on a partisan basis, and are disclosed according to state and federal laws and regulations. Corporate Political Contributions Regions is prohibited by law from making contributions or expenditures in connection with any federal and some state elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Circuits of Power in Alabama's Immigration Politics: Labor Justice and Corporate Social Responsibility
    Circuits of Power in Alabama's Immigration Politics: Labor Justice and Corporate Social Responsibility Elizabeth C. S. Jamison Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Alliance for Social, Political, Ethical, and Cultural Thought Barbara Ellen Smith, Chair Patricia M. Nickel Max O. Stephenson, Jr. Richard E. Wokutch October 28, 2015 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Power, Immigration Policy, Corporate Social Responsibility, Critical Theory, Race, Labor Justice, State Politics Copyright E. C. S. Jamison (2015) Circuits of Power in Alabama's Immigration Politics: Labor Justice and Corporate Social Responsibility Elizabeth C. S. Jamison ABSTRACT At the time of its debate and passage in 2010-2011, Alabama’s immigration law evoked support and opposition from across the state and nation. Despite the outcry, the Alabama business community projected a pronounced public “silence.” This silence was particularly curious because of the law’s clear and intended goal of self-deportation of Latinos who are a significant labor source for Alabama agri-businesses and food processing industries. The key question for this dissertation is: Why did the poultry processing industry, which has high populations of Latino employees and a significant industrial presence in Alabama, stay publicly silent despite a predictable impact on their labor supply? This qualitative analysis used the lens of the circuits of power model to interrogate this question. The findings indicate that Alabama poultry processors found themselves susceptible to the same opportunities and challenges as any other social actor confronted with the racialized, politicized, and historically contingent challenges facing Latino labor in Alabama.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing in Alabama Gbenga Ojumu Prairie View A&M University, [email protected]
    Professional Agricultural Workers Journal Volume 3 5 Number 2 Professional Agricultural Workers Journal 4-6-2016 Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing in Alabama Gbenga Ojumu Prairie View A&M University, [email protected] Diane Hite Auburn University Deacue Fields Auburn University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://tuspubs.tuskegee.edu/pawj Part of the Agricultural Economics Commons, and the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Recommended Citation Ojumu, Gbenga; Hite, Diane; and Fields, Deacue (2016) "Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing in Alabama," Professional Agricultural Workers Journal: Vol. 3: No. 2, 5. Available at: http://tuspubs.tuskegee.edu/pawj/vol3/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Tuskegee Scholarly Publications. It has been accepted for inclusion in Professional Agricultural Workers Journal by an authorized administrator of Tuskegee Scholarly Publications. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ECONOMIC IMPACT OF RECREATIONAL FISHING IN ALABAMA *Gbenga Ojumu1, Diane Hite2, and Deacue Fields2 1Prairie View A&M University, Prairie, TX 2Auburn University, Auburn, AL Email of lead author: [email protected] Abstract Anglers’ direct mail survey data were used with IMPLAN (Impact Analysis for Planning), input- output system, to estimate the economic impact of recreational fishing in Alabama and the Alabama Black Belt. Separate economic impacts are analyzed for the Black Belt and the State; and direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts were estimated for government revenues, income, and employment. Possible increases in these impacts were also estimated for hypothetically improved recreational fishing sites, using the ‘ideal’ hypothetical site characteristics. The results showed a direct total value added impact of $102.5m; indirect impact of $24.7m, and an induced impact of $8.3m, which all add up to a total impact of $135.5m in total value added to the State.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Northern Division
    Case 2:12-cv-00691-WKW-MHT-WHP Document 203 Filed 12/20/13 Page 1 of 173 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ALABAMA LEGISLATIVE ) BLACK CAUCUS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) CASE NO. 2:12-CV-691 v. ) (Three-Judge Court) ) THE STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________ ) ) ALABAMA DEMOCRATIC ) CONFERENCE, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) CASE NO. 2:12-CV-1081 v. ) (Three-Judge Court) ) THE STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before PRYOR, Circuit Judge, WATKINS, Chief District Judge, and THOMPSON, District Judge. PRYOR, Circuit Judge: “There’s no perfect reapportionment plan. A reapportionment plan depends on what the drafter wants to get, and he can draw them many, many, many ways.” Dr. Joe Reed, Chairman, Alabama Democratic Conference. (Trial Tr. vol. 2, 155, Aug. 9, 2013). Case 2:12-cv-00691-WKW-MHT-WHP Document 203 Filed 12/20/13 Page 2 of 173 The Constitution of Alabama of 1901 requires the Alabama Legislature to redistrict itself following each decennial census of the United States, Ala. Const. Art. IX, §§ 199–200, but for a half century—from 1911 to 1961—the Legislature failed to fulfill that duty. Then the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that this abdication could be tolerated no longer, and it affirmed the judgment of this Court that the Alabama Legislature had to be apportioned after each census based on the principle of one person, one vote. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 568, 586, 84 S. Ct. 1362, 1385, 1394 (1964).
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Roster Legislative Roster
    66064 ARA roster_ARA Legislative Roster 0211 1/13/14 9:49 AM Page 1 SENATE Officers & Committees HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Officers & Committees Kay Ivey . Lt. Governor and President of the Senate Craig Ford . Minority Leader Del Marsh . President Pro Tem Mike Hubbard. Speaker of the House Jabo Waggoner . Majority Leader Victor Gaston. Speaker Pro Tem Alvin Holmes . Dean of the House Vivian Figures. Minority Leader Micky Hammon . Majority Leader Clerks and their phone #s listed with committees. Unless otherwise noted, phone numbers begin with (334) 242- Clerks and their phone #s listed with committees. All phone numbers begin with (334) 242- RULES Maggie Harmon, 7673 INSURANCE TRANSPORTATION, UTILITIES EDUCATION POLICY Karen Cheeks, 7621 2014 RULES FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY & ACCOUNTABILITY 2014 qMcCutcheon, Chairperson Tracey Arnold, (334) 353-0995 & INFRASTRUCTURE qMcClurkin, Chair qP. Williams, Vice Chair qWaggoner, Chairperson Sue Spears, 7853 qWilliams, Chairperson Sabrina Gaston, 7848 qR. Johnson, Vice Chairperson qHill, Chairperson Tracey Arnold, (334) 353-0995 qBlack, Ranking Minority Member qHolley, Vice Chairperson qBussman qColeman qGlover qKeahey qBuskey, Ranking Minority Member qWren, Vice Chairperson qGreer, Chairperson qBeech qButtram qCollins qHenry qBeasonqBedford qBussman qDial qMarsh qScofield qTaylor qBoyd qFord qGaston qGreer qHarper qMcAdory, Ranking Minority Member qGaston, Vice Chair person qJackson qMitchell qRich qVance qDunn qFigures qGlover qIrons LegislativeLegislative JOB CREATION & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT qJones qLaird
    [Show full text]
  • United States Bankruptcy Court District of Delaware
    UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Case No. 09-10124 GOODY'S, LLC Chapter 11 Debtor. SCHEDULES OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES GOODY'S, LLC (the "Debtor") hereby submits its Schedules of Assets and Liabilities pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 521 and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1007. Declaration I, David G. Peek, declare under penalty of perjury that I have reviewed the information contained in these Schedules of Assets and Liabilities (the "Schedules"), and subject to the general notes regarding the Schedules and my reliance on the Debtor's personnel involved in the preparation of these Schedules, that they are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. Dated: March 16, 2009 /s/ David G. Peek Signature David G. Peek Name Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer Title UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: GOODY'S, LLC Case No.: 09-10124 SUMMARY OF SCHEDULES Indicate as to each schedule whether that schedule is attached. Report the totals from Schedules A, B, D, E, F, I, and J in the boxes provided. Add the amounts from Schedules A and B to determine the total amount of the debtor's assets. Add the amounts of all claims from Schedules D, E, and F to determine the total amount of the debtor's liabilities. ATTACHED NAME OF SCHEDULE (YES/NO) ASSETS LIABILITIES A. Real Property Yes $0.00 B. Personal Property Yes $542,231,601.04 C. Property Claimed As Exempt No D. Creditors Holding Secured Claims Yes $61,650,692.58 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Roster
    SENATE Officers & Committees HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HOUSE Officers & Committees (cont.) Kay Ivey .................................................................Lt. Governor and President of the Senate Mike Hubbard......................................................................................Speaker of the House Craig Ford ........................................................................................................Minority Leader Del Marsh ................................................................................................President Pro Tem Victor Gaston ..............................................................................................Speaker Pro Tem Alvin Holmes ..............................................................................................Dean of the House Greg Reed ................................................................................................... Majority Leader Micky Hammon ..........................................................................................Majority Leader Clerks and their phone #s listed with committees. Unless otherwise noted, phone numbers begin with (334) 242- Quinton Ross ......................................................................................... Minority Leader RULES Maggie Harmon, 7673 INSURANCE TRANSPORTATION, UTILITIES EDUCATION POLICY Ashley Hines, 7666 2016 Clerks and their phone #s listed with committees. All phone numbers begin with (334) 242- qMcCutcheon, Chairperson Ashley Hines, 7666 & INFRASTRUCTURE qCollins,
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Legislative Roster
    SENATE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HOUSE officers & committees • 334-261-0800 officers & committees • 334-261-0500 officers & committees (cont.) Will Ainsworth, Lieutenant Governor / Del Marsh, President Pro Tem Mac McCutcheon, Speaker of the House Nathaniel Ledbetter, Majority Leader Greg Reed, Majority Leader / Clyde Chambliss, Majority Floor Leader Victor Gaston, Speaker Pro Tem Anthony Daniels, Minority Leader Bobby Singleton, Minority Leader Clerks and their phone #s listed with committees. All phone numbers begin with (334) 261- Clerks and their phone #s listed with committees. All phone numbers begin with (334) 261- Clerks and their phone #s listed with committees. All phone numbers begin with (334) 261- RULES RULES Tracey Arnold, 0573 FINANCIAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION, UTILITIES PUBLIC SAFETY & HOMELAND SECURITY Sue Spears, 0853 ❑Jones, M., Chairperson Carmen Berrey/Morgan Joiner, 0468 & INFRASTRUCTURE Teresa Evans, 0550 2019 BANKING & INSURANCE ❑Waggoner, Chairperson ❑Rowe, Vice Chairperson ❑Blackshear, Chairperson Evonne Jackson, 0470 ❑Treadaway, Chairperson Katie Fisher, 0710 ❑Scofi eld, Vice Chaiperson ❑Boyd, Ranking Minority Member ❑Whitt, Vice Chairperson ❑Greer, Chairperson ❑Farley, Vice Chairperson ❑Shelnutt, Chairperson ❑Smitherman, Ranking Minority Member ❑Brown, C. ❑Daniels ❑Faulkner ❑Gaston ❑Rogers, Ranking Minority Member ❑Faust, Vice Chair person ❑Jackson, Ranking Minority Member ❑Williams, Vice Chaiperson Legislative ❑Allen ❑Coleman-Madison ❑Figures ❑Howard ❑Johnson ❑Ledbetter ❑McMillan ❑Coleman ❑Ingram ❑Lawrence ❑McClammy
    [Show full text]