DOCSLIB.ORG

Nuleaf Kaba Ecology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nuleaf Kaba Ecology PROPOSED KABA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Baseline Terrestrial Ecology Study & Sensitivity Assessment JULY 2018 Prepared for: Peter Velcich NuLeaf Planning and Environmental PostNet Suite 168 Private Bag X 844 Silverton 0127 Prepared by: Warren McCleland ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC Postnet Suite 192 Private Bag X2 Raslouw 0109 KABA LODGE ECOLOGY STUDY & SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT (ECOREX) JULY 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ 3 ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 5 TERMINOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................ 5 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE ....................................................................................................... 6 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 7 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE ..................................................................................................................... 8 3. STUDY AREA ........................................................................................................................................... 9 4. METHODS ............................................................................................................................................... 11 4.1 FLORA......................................................................................................................................................... 11 4.2 FAUNA ........................................................................................................................................................ 11 4.3 SENSITIVITY AND IMPORTANCE ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................... 12 5. ASSUMPTIONS, LIMITATIONS & KNOWLEDGE GAPS .................................................................. 13 5.1 Seasonality ........................................................................................................................................... 13 5.2 Overlooked Species ............................................................................................................................ 13 5.3 Vegetation Clearing............................................................................................................................. 13 6. BIODIVERSITY BASELINE DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................ 15 6.1 FLORA......................................................................................................................................................... 15 6.1.1 Regional Context .............................................................................................................................. 15 6.1.2 Local Vegetation Communities ...................................................................................................... 18 6.1.3 Conservation-Important Flora ........................................................................................................ 22 6.2 TERRESTRIAL FAUNA ................................................................................................................................. 24 6.2.1 Mammals ........................................................................................................................................... 24 6.2.2 Birds ................................................................................................................................................... 25 6.2.3 Reptiles & Frogs ............................................................................................................................... 28 7. SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................ 30 8. KEY POTENTIAL IMPACTS .................................................................................................................. 32 9. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................ 33 10. REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................... 34 11. APPENDICES ....................................................................................................................................... 36 APPENDIX 1. CHECKLIST OF FLORA RECORDED DURING FIELDWORK ............................................................ 36 APPENDIX 2. PLANT SPECIES OF CONSERVATION CONCERN OCCURRING IN GENERAL VICINITY OF THE STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................................................................. 41 APPENDIX 3. CHECKLIST OF MAMMALS AND BIRDS RECORDED DURING FIELDWORK ..................................... 45 APPENDIX 4. FAUNA OF CONSERVATION CONCERN OCCURRING WITHIN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF THE STUDY AREA ...................................................................................................................................................... 51 APPENDIX 5. CURRICULUM VITAE OF DUNCAN MCKENZIE ............................................................................. 54 APPENDIX 6. SPECIALISTS DECLARATION ....................................................................................................... 55 2 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC Postnet Suite #192, Private Bag X2 Raslouw 0109 (083) 231-5632 [email protected] KABA LODGE ECOLOGY STUDY & SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT (ECOREX) JULY 2018 List of Tables Table 1. Sensitivity Driver Scores.................................................................................................................... 12 Table 2. Overall Sensitivity and Importance Scores ..................................................................................... 12 Table 3. Sensitivity Assessment of Vegetation Communities and Relevant Infrastructure .................... 30 List of Figures Figure 1. Location of Study Area ..................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 2. Map showing the Eastern Cape Biodiversity Conservation Plan Assessment for the study area ...................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 3. Photographs of Coastal Dune Forest in the study area .............................................................. 19 Figure 4. Photographs of Dry Evergreen Thicket .......................................................................................... 20 Figure 5. Photographs of Degraded Open Woodland .................................................................................. 21 Figure 6. Vegetation communities within the study area ............................................................................. 23 Figure 7. Sensitivity Values for the vegetation communities within the study area ................................. 31 3 ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC Postnet Suite #192, Private Bag X2 Raslouw 0109 (083) 231-5632 [email protected] KABA LODGE ECOLOGY STUDY & SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT (ECOREX) JULY 2018 EIA REGULATIONS SPECIALISTS REPORT CHECKLIST (1) A specialist report prepared in terms of the 2014 Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations must contain- (a) details of- (i) the specialist who prepared the report; and page 07 (ii) the expertise of that specialist to compile a specialist report including a curriculum vitae; page 54 (b) a declaration that the specialist is independent in a form as may be specified by the competent authority; page 55 (c) an indication of the scope of, and the purpose for which, the report was prepared; page 07 (d) the date and season of the site investigation and the relevance of the season to the outcome of the assessment; page 11 (e) a description of the methodology adopted in preparing the report or carrying out the specialised process; page 11 (f) the specific identified sensitivity of the site related to the activity and its associated structures and infrastructure; page 30 (g) an identification of any areas to be avoided, including buffers; page 33 (h) a map superimposing the activity including the associated structures and infrastructure on the environmental page 31 sensitivities of the site including areas to be avoided, including buffers; (i) a description of any assumptions made and any uncertainties or gaps in knowledge; page 13 (j) a description of the findings and potential implications of such findings on the impact of the proposed activity, page 30 including identified alternatives on the environment; (k) any mitigation measures for inclusion in the EMPr; page 33 (l) any conditions for inclusion in the environmental authorisation; page 33 (m) any monitoring requirements for inclusion in the EMPr or environmental authorisation; page 33 (n) a reasoned opinion- (i) as to whether the proposed activity or
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bark Medicines Used in Traditional Healthcare in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa: an Inventory
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector South African Journal of Botany 2003, 69(3): 301–363 Copyright © NISC Pty Ltd Printed in South Africa — All rights reserved SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY ISSN 0254–6299 Bark medicines used in traditional healthcare in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: An inventory OM Grace1, HDV Prendergast2, AK Jäger3 and J van Staden1* 1 Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Botany and Zoology, University of Natal Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa 2 Centre for Economic Botany, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, United Kingdom 3 Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Royal Danish School of Pharmacy, 2 Universitetsparken, 2100 Copenhagen 0, Denmark * Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Received 13 June 2002, accepted in revised form 14 March 2003 Bark is an important source of medicine in South Overlapping vernacular names recorded in the literature African traditional healthcare but is poorly documented. indicated that it may be unreliable in local plant identifi- From thorough surveys of the popular ethnobotanical cations. Most (43%) bark medicines were documented literature, and other less widely available sources, 174 for the treatment of internal ailments. Sixteen percent of species (spanning 108 genera and 50 families) used for species were classed in threatened conservation cate- their bark in KwaZulu-Natal, were inventoried. gories, but conservation and management data were Vernacular names, morphological and phytochemical limited or absent from a further 62%. There is a need for properties, usage and conservation data were captured research and specialist publications to address the in a database that aimed to synthesise published infor- gaps in existing knowledge of medicinal bark species mation of such species.
    [Show full text]
  • Rdna) Organisation
    OPEN Heredity (2013) 111, 23–33 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0018-067X/13 www.nature.com/hdy ORIGINAL ARTICLE Dancing together and separate again: gymnosperms exhibit frequent changes of fundamental 5S and 35S rRNA gene (rDNA) organisation S Garcia1 and A Kovarˇı´k2 In higher eukaryotes, the 5S rRNA genes occur in tandem units and are arranged either separately (S-type arrangement) or linked to other repeated genes, in most cases to rDNA locus encoding 18S–5.8S–26S genes (L-type arrangement). Here we used Southern blot hybridisation, PCR and sequencing approaches to analyse genomic organisation of rRNA genes in all large gymnosperm groups, including Coniferales, Ginkgoales, Gnetales and Cycadales. The data are provided for 27 species (21 genera). The 5S units linked to the 35S rDNA units occur in some but not all Gnetales, Coniferales and in Ginkgo (B30% of the species analysed), while the remaining exhibit separate organisation. The linked 5S rRNA genes may occur as single-copy insertions or as short tandems embedded in the 26S–18S rDNA intergenic spacer (IGS). The 5S transcript may be encoded by the same (Ginkgo, Ephedra) or opposite (Podocarpus) DNA strand as the 18S–5.8S–26S genes. In addition, pseudogenised 5S copies were also found in some IGS types. Both L- and S-type units have been largely homogenised across the genomes. Phylogenetic relationships based on the comparison of 5S coding sequences suggest that the 5S genes independently inserted IGS at least three times in the course of gymnosperm evolution. Frequent transpositions and rearrangements of basic units indicate relatively relaxed selection pressures imposed on genomic organisation of 5S genes in plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: the State of the World's Forest Genetic Resources
    ETHIOPIA This country report is prepared as a contribution to the FAO publication, The Report on the State of the World’s Forest Genetic Resources. The content and the structure are in accordance with the recommendations and guidelines given by FAO in the document Guidelines for Preparation of Country Reports for the State of the World’s Forest Genetic Resources (2010). These guidelines set out recommendations for the objective, scope and structure of the country reports. Countries were requested to consider the current state of knowledge of forest genetic diversity, including: Between and within species diversity List of priority species; their roles and values and importance List of threatened/endangered species Threats, opportunities and challenges for the conservation, use and development of forest genetic resources These reports were submitted to FAO as official government documents. The report is presented on www. fao.org/documents as supportive and contextual information to be used in conjunction with other documentation on world forest genetic resources. The content and the views expressed in this report are the responsibility of the entity submitting the report to FAO. FAO may not be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained in this report. THE STATE OF FOREST GENETIC RESOURCES OF ETHIOPIA INSTITUTE OF BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION (IBC) COUNTRY REPORT SUBMITTED TO FAO ON THE STATE OF FOREST GENETIC RESOURCES OF ETHIOPIA AUGUST 2012 ADDIS ABABA IBC © Institute of Biodiversity Conservation (IBC)
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME for NOETZIE CONSERVANCY OWNERS ASSOCIATION
    Cape Environmental Assessment Practitioners (Pty) Ltd Reg. No. 2008/004627/07 Telephone: (044) 874 0365 1st Floor Eagles View Building Facsimile: (044) 874 0432 5 Progress Street, George Web: www.cape-eaprac.co.za PO Box 2070, George 6530 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME For NOETZIE CONSERVANCY OWNERS ASSOCIATION Prepared for: Noetzie Conservancy Owners Association By: Cape EAPrac Report Reference: KNY123/01 Date: 15 December 2011 D.J. Jeffery Directors L. van Zyl APPOINTED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTITIONER: Cape EAPrac Environmental Assessment Practitioners PO Box 2070 George 6530 Tel: 044-874 0365 Fax: 044-874 0432 Report written & compiled by: Melissa Mackay (ND Nature Conservation), who has five years’ experience as an environmental practitioner. Report reviewed by: Louise-Mari van Zyl (MA Geography & Environmental Science [US]; Registered Environmental Assessment Practitioner with the Interim Certification Board for Environmental Assessment Practitioners of South Africa, EAPSA); Member of the Southern Cape International Association for Impact Assessments (IAIA) committee. Ms van Zyl has over ten years’ experience as an environmental practitioner. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT: Environmental Management Plan for Noetzie Conservancy Owners Association APPLICANT: Noetzie Conservancy Owners Association (NCOA) CAPE EAPRAC REFERENCE NO: KNY123/01 SUBMISSION DATE 15 December 2011 Noetzie Owners Conservancy Association KNY123/01 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME NOETZIE CONSERVANCY OWNERS ASSOCIATION NOETZIE, KNYSNA This report is the property
    [Show full text]
  • Plants & Ecology
    Comparing avifauna communities and bird functional diversity of forest and farmland in southwest Ethiopia by Dries Engelen Plants & Ecology Plant Ecology 2012/5 Department of Botany Stockholm University Comparing avifauna communities and bird functional diversity of forest and farmland in southwest Ethiopia by Dries Engelen Supervisor: Kristoffer Hylander Plants & Ecology Plant Ecology 2012/5 Department of Botany Stockholm University Plants & Ecology Plant Ecology Department of Botany Stockholm University S-106 91 Stockholm Sweden © Plant Ecology ISSN 1651-9248 Printed by FMV Printcenter Cover: Middle photo: Black-crowned Cranes in the farmland. Other pictures from top left to bottom right: Four forest specialist birds: Zoothera Piaggiae, Mandingoa nitidula, Oriolus monacha & Columba larvata. Photos by Dries Engelen. ABSTRACT - Worldwide degradation and conversion of tropical forests affects many species and their provided ecosystem services. Among them are birds, responsible for pollination, seed dispersal, pest control and scavenging. This study, conducted in southwest Ethiopia, compares species composition and bird functional diversity between forest and homegardens close to and far from forest, both in terms of species numbers and bird abundances. Point counts and mist netting were used to obtain data. While the former method detected more species, abundance data from the latter revealed patterns not observed by just comparing species numbers. I found that species diversity was lower in forest compared to gardens and that the species composition of both communities was significantly distinct. Whereas forest had more forest specialists, gardens held more forest visitors and species of open country. Close and far gardens did not differ in any aspect, except that abundances of forest generalist birds were somewhat higher close to forest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Cavitation Resistance in Conifers Maximilian Larter
    The evolution of cavitation resistance in conifers Maximilian Larter To cite this version: Maximilian Larter. The evolution of cavitation resistance in conifers. Bioclimatology. Univer- sit´ede Bordeaux, 2016. English. <NNT : 2016BORD0103>. <tel-01375936> HAL Id: tel-01375936 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01375936 Submitted on 3 Oct 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destin´eeau d´ep^otet `ala diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publi´esou non, lished or not. The documents may come from ´emanant des ´etablissements d'enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche fran¸caisou ´etrangers,des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou priv´es. THESE Pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITE DE BORDEAUX Spécialité : Ecologie évolutive, fonctionnelle et des communautés Ecole doctorale: Sciences et Environnements Evolution de la résistance à la cavitation chez les conifères The evolution of cavitation resistance in conifers Maximilian LARTER Directeur : Sylvain DELZON (DR INRA) Co-Directeur : Jean-Christophe DOMEC (Professeur, BSA) Soutenue le 22/07/2016 Devant le jury composé de : Rapporteurs : Mme Amy ZANNE, Prof., George Washington University Mr Jordi MARTINEZ VILALTA, Prof., Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona Examinateurs : Mme Lisa WINGATE, CR INRA, UMR ISPA, Bordeaux Mr Jérôme CHAVE, DR CNRS, UMR EDB, Toulouse i ii Abstract Title: The evolution of cavitation resistance in conifers Abstract Forests worldwide are at increased risk of widespread mortality due to intense drought under current and future climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Download E-Book (PDF)
    International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation Volume 7 Number 2, February 2015 ISSN 2141-243X ABOUT IJBC The International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation (IJBC) (ISSN 2141-243X) is published Monthly (one volume per year) by Academic Journals. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation (IJBC) provides rapid publication (monthly) of articles in all areas of the subject such as Information Technology and its Applications in Environmental Management and Planning, Environmental Management and Technologies, Green Technology and Environmental Conservation, Health: Environment and Sustainable Development etc. The Journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts that meet the general criteria of significance and scientific excellence. Papers will be published shortly after acceptance. All articles published in IJBC are peer reviewed. Submission of Manuscript Please read the Instructions for Authors before submitting your manuscript. The manuscript files should be given the last name of the first author Click here to Submit manuscripts online If you have any difficulty using the online submission system, kindly submit via this email [email protected]. With questions or concerns, please contact the Editorial Office at [email protected]. Editor-In-Chief Associate Editors Prof. Samir I. Ghabbour Dr. Shannon Barber-Meyer Department of Natural Resources, World Wildlife Fund Institute of African Research & Studies, Cairo 1250 24th St. NW, Washington, DC 20037 University, Egypt USA Dr. Shyam Singh Yadav Editors National Agricultural Research Institute, Papua New Guinea Dr. Edilegnaw Wale, PhD Department of Agricultural Economics School of Agricultural Sciences and Agribusiness Dr. Michael G. Andreu University of Kwazulu-Natal School of Forest Resources and Conservation P bag X 01 Scoffsville 3209 University of Florida - GCREC Pietermaritzburg 1200 N.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Podocarp Roots, Mycorrhizas, and Nodules Ian A
    11 Podocarp Roots, Mycorrhizas, and Nodules Ian A. Dickie and Robert J. Holdaway ABSTRACT. Podocarps are often found on low- nutrient soils and further exacerbate nutrient limitation through the production of recalcitrant litter. Understanding podo- carp ecology therefore depends on understanding the root adaptations of podocarps to obtain nutrients. The roots of podocarps are heterorhizic (having two root forms) with abundant spherical determinate short roots, a unique form of largely unknown function, as well as indeterminate fine roots. There is no strong evidence for nitrogen fixation in the nodules. Although nodules are frequently and abundantly colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, they are neither required for mycorrhizal infection nor dependent on mycorrhizal infection for their development. The fungal symbiont community associated with podocarps does not appear to be distinctive from that of other plants at a global scale, although it may differ from co-occurring plants within a site. Perhaps the most obvious, yet largely overlooked, hypothesis is that the form of the nodules is the func- tion. The presence of nodules permits a doubling of root cortex volume, while simple geometry indicates that a spherical form involves the lowest possible cost in producing cell wall and membrane material per unit of root volume. Increased root volume permits greater arbuscular mycorrhizal interaction, and hence, nodules may be analogous to the determinate ectomycorrhizal roots of the Pinaceae as a structure to maximize fungal interactions at minimal root construction cost. INTRODUCTION Ian A. Dickie, Landcare Research, Box 40, Lin- Podocarps (gymnosperms in the Podocarpaceae) grow on a range of soils coln 7640, New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Download 2015 Tour Report
    The Ethiopian Highlands and the Great Rift Valley A Greentours Tour Report 14th – 28th November 2015 Led by Phil Benstead & Rondi Salter Daily report by Phil Benstead & Rondi Salter Day 1 14th November flight We all gathered at Heathrow for the flight but most of us actually failed to meet up with each other at the gate and before we knew it we were asleep on the plane crossing Africa. Day 2 15th November Addis Ababa and Geferessa Bleary-eyed we emerged from the plane in the early morning and finally all met up at the baggage carousel. Outside we changed some money and then found Zelé and the Ethiopian driver team in the car park waiting patiently. Soon we were packed into three 4WDs and heading for downtown Addis and our hotel. Checking in so early in the morning was problematic though but we all had rooms eventually and breakfast was most welcome. This left a little free time to get ourselves organised before we headed out to the hills around Addis to get some fresh air. Lunch dispatched we took to the cars and drove out of a bustling, dusty town to get to some wildlife around the reservoir at Geferessa. Access was limited to the road but we managed to assemble the start of our bird list and start photographing some of the butterflies and dragonflies available. Birds here included some fine African snipe and a few more prosaic waders species. Out on the lake our first Egyptian geese jostled with some nice yellow-billed duck and a few Palearctic migrants like shoveler and pintail.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnobotany, Phytochemistry and Pharmacology of Podocarpus Sensu Latissimo (S.L.) ⁎ H.S
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com South African Journal of Botany 76 (2010) 1–24 www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb Review Ethnobotany, phytochemistry and pharmacology of Podocarpus sensu latissimo (s.l.) ⁎ H.S. Abdillahi, G.I. Stafford, J.F. Finnie, J. Van Staden Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa Received 26 August 2009; accepted 2 September 2009 Abstract The genus Podocarpus sensu latissimo (s.l.) was initially subdivided into eight sections. However, based on new information from different morphological and anatomical studies, these sections were recognised as new genera. This change in nomenclature sometimes is problematic when consulting ethnobotanical data especially when selecting plants for pharmacological screening, thus there is a need to clear any ambiguity with the nomenclature. Species of Podocarpus s.l. are important timber trees in their native areas. They have been used by many communities in traditional medicine and as a source of income. Podocarpus s.l. is used in the treatment of fevers, asthma, coughs, cholera, distemper, chest complaints and venereal diseases. Other uses include timber, food, wax, tannin and as ornamental trees. Although extensive research has been carried out on species of Podocarpus s.l over the last decade, relatively little is known about the African species compared to those of New Zealand, Australia, China and Japan. Phytochemical studies have led to the isolation and elucidation of various terpenoids and nor- and bis- norditerpenoid dilactones. Biflavonoids of the amentoflavone and hinokiflavone types have also been isolated.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices 3.5 Parkway Landscaping Guidelines
    CHAPTER 3 - APPENDICES 3.5 PARKWAY LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES 3.1 CITY TREE INVENTORY 3.6 HOW TO HELP URBAN TREES SURVIVE A DROUGHT (WATERING) 3.2 TREE SPECIES, NURSERY STOCK SELECTION AND PLANTING 3.7 TREE RISK MANAGEMENT 3.3 TREE PRUNING 3.8 STREET TREE DESIGNATIONS LIST 3.4 PLANNING AND THE PROTECTION OF PUBLIC TREES DURING 3.9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 3.1 CITY TREE INVENTORY The City tree inventory includes, but is not limited to, all publicly owned trees on street right-of-way (ROW), parks, City facilities and open spaces such as medians, beaches and the City part of the bluff below Palisades Park. A Global Positioning System (GPS) tree inventory will be maintained with a continuously updated database using the City’s standardized addressing system for all streets, parks and open space areas. The inventory data shall be formatted into an ESRI ArcView/ArcGIS compatible shapefile for interaction with the City’s Information System. The tree inventory will be capable of showing the location of all existing tree sites and vacancies on the City’s existing Geographic Information Systems (GIS) base maps for streets, parcels, addresses, ROW and hardscapes, etc. The tree inventory will be maintained by regular updating during urban forest operations. The data shall be compatible with the latest version of ArcGIS. Minimum accuracy shall not be more than three feet (3’).The data will be in a format suitable for use in i-Tree. Tree information to be collected includes, but may not be limited to: • Species • Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) • Height • Crown spread • Tree Condition • Work history City of Santa Monica Urban Forest Master Plan 2020 3.2 TREE SPECIES, NURSERY STOCK SELECTION AND PLANTING SELECTING SPECIES Santa Monica’s street tree species are identified by street segment within the Urban Forest Master Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • The City of Melbourne's Future Urban Forest
    TheThe CitCityy ofof Melbourne’sMelbourne’s 5dcdaTDaQP]5^aTbc5dcdaTDaQP]5^aTbc Identifying vulnerability to future temperatures Authors: Dave Kendal, Jess Baumann Burnley Campus School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences The University of Melbourne 500 Yarra Boulevard VIC 3010 AUSTRALIA T: +61 3 8344 0267 Contact: [email protected] Epert advice from Stephen Frank, Steve Livesley, Peter Symes, Anna Foley, David Reid, Peter May, Ian Shears and David Callow. First printed June 2016. Published online November 2016 by the Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub: http:// www.nespurban.edu.au/publications-resources/research-reports/ CAULRR02_CoMFutureUrbanForest_Nov2016.pdf The Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub is funded under the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme with a mission to take a comprehensive view of the sustainability and liveability of urban environments. © The City of Melbourne 2016. Executive Summary Climate change is likely to have a significant effect on many trees in the City of Melbourne. Some species will perform better, while some will perform worse. The report describes the results of a project exploring the vulnerability of tree species currently planted in the City of Melbourne, and identifies some potential new species that may be more suitable for the City’s climate futures. A list of species combining those currently in the City of Melbourne’s urban forest with those being newly planted in the City of Melbourne was created. The global locations where species occur naturally and are in cultivation (and abundance where available) were compiled from existing datasets, such as ‘open data’ tree inventories and extracted from other published data, from approximately 200 cities around the world.
    [Show full text]