DOCSLIB.ORG

HS2 Phase Two Initial Preferred Scheme Sustainability Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HS2 Phase Two Initial Preferred Scheme Sustainability Summary HS2 Phase Two Initial Preferred Scheme Sustainability Summary January 2013 HS2 Phase Two Initial Preferred Scheme Sustainability Summary A Report for HS2 Ltd High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2nd Floor, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU [email protected] Principal author Nick Giesler Key contributors Andrew Mayes, Charlene Baker, Tamsin Lowe, Jonathan Say, Lucy Hayward and Amy Cook Technical contributors Landscape & townscape Julie Martin Cultural heritage Julian Munby and Jill Hind Biodiversity Jon Riley Water and flood risk Tony Clothier, Fiona Parry and Nick Moult Noise and vibration John Fisk, Ismail Alli-Balogun and Sasha Villa Socio-economics John Siraut and Amanda Pownall Resources and consumption Steve Glenny Reviewers Mark Southwood and Bruce Davidson This report was commissioned by, and prepared for HS2 Ltd and the Department for Transport (DfT) by Temple Group Ltd and Environmental Resources Management ('The Consultant'). The findings and conclusions set forth in this report represent the best professional judgment of the Consultant based on information made available to it. The Consultant has relied on, and not independently verified, data provided to it by such sources and on secondary sources of information cited in the report. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. We accept no responsibility to third parties to whom this report, or any part, thereof is made available. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 1 1. CONTEXT FOR THE SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY ......................................................... 5 2. HS2 AND THE INITIAL PREFERRED SCHEME ................................................................ 5 3. THE APPRAISAL OF SUSTAINABILITY PROCESS ......................................................... 8 3.1. Strategic approach ................................................................................................... 8 3.2. Support to option sifting ........................................................................................... 9 4. SCHEME DESCRIPTION SUMMARY ............................................................................... 12 4.1. Initial preferred scheme: western leg route, stations and depots ............................ 12 4.2. Initial preferred scheme: eastern leg route, stations and depots ............................ 16 5. DESCRIBING SUSTAINABILITY IMPACTS AND THEIR MITIGATION ........................... 22 5.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 22 5.2. Planning and development ..................................................................................... 23 5.3. Employment and housing ...................................................................................... 24 5.4. Access issues ........................................................................................................ 24 5.5. Property and settlements ....................................................................................... 25 5.6. Noise ..................................................................................................................... 25 5.7. Landscape ............................................................................................................. 26 5.8. Cultural heritage .................................................................................................... 26 5.9. Biodiversity and wildlife .......................................................................................... 27 5.10. Water resources and flood risk .............................................................................. 27 5.11. Land use resource ................................................................................................. 28 5.12. Waste and material use ......................................................................................... 28 6. POTENTIAL SUSTAINABILITY IMPACTS: WESTERN LEG ........................................... 29 6.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 29 6.2. Planning and development ..................................................................................... 29 6.3. Employment and housing ...................................................................................... 30 6.4. Access issues ........................................................................................................ 30 6.5. Property and settlements ....................................................................................... 31 6.6. Noise ..................................................................................................................... 31 6.7. Landscape ............................................................................................................. 32 6.8. Cultural heritage .................................................................................................... 34 6.9. Biodiversity and wildlife .......................................................................................... 35 6.10. Water resources and flood risk .............................................................................. 36 6.11. Land use resources ............................................................................................... 37 6.12. Waste and material use ......................................................................................... 37 7. POTENTIAL SUSTAINABILITY IMPACTS: EASTERN LEG ............................................ 38 7.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 38 7.2. Planning and development ..................................................................................... 38 7.3. Employment and housing ...................................................................................... 39 7.4. Access issues ........................................................................................................ 40 7.5. Property and settlements ....................................................................................... 40 7.6. Noise ..................................................................................................................... 41 7.7. Landscape ............................................................................................................. 41 7.8. Cultural heritage .................................................................................................... 45 7.9. Biodiversity and wildlife .......................................................................................... 47 7.10. Water resources and flood risk .............................................................................. 48 7.11. Land use resources ............................................................................................... 49 7.12. Waste and material use ......................................................................................... 49 8. HS2 POTENTIAL COMBINED IMPACTS ......................................................................... 50 MAPS ……………………………………………………………………………………...............54 Executive summary The initial preferred scheme This Sustainability Summary describes the potential impacts on people and the environment, both adverse and beneficial, of the Government's initial preferred scheme for Phase Two of High Speed Two (HS2), the proposed national high speed rail network. Appraisal work is ongoing, but the Summary reflects the findings of the appraisal undertaken to date. Further information on the proposals is set out in the DfT‟s High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain’s Future. Phase Two: The route to Leeds, Manchester and beyond. Phase Two will comprise northward extensions of the HS2 Phase One route along separate western and eastern legs via Manchester and Leeds respectively. The western leg of the initial preferred scheme would ultimately connect with the West Coast Main Line near Golborne; it would include a station in Manchester city centre, as well as a station at Manchester Airport. The eastern leg would connect with the East Coast Main Line south- west of York; as well as a station in Leeds, it would include intermediate stations at Toton near Nottingham (called the East Midlands Hub) and at Meadowhall, Sheffield. The initial preferred scheme has been chosen by Government from a number of alternatives presented to it by HS2 Ltd in March 2012. Following discussions about the scheme with affected local councils and MPs, the Government is expected to announce a preferred scheme for public consultation later this year. Sustainability and design The initial preferred scheme has emerged from several hundred options as the one considered overall to best meet objectives for passenger demand, cost, ease-of-build, journey time and sustainability. Considerations of sustainability have been integral to scheme design since commencing work on Phase Two in autumn 2010. During this time, the sustainability team has worked closely with the engineers to develop route and station proposals that fit as far as possible with the environment and communities they pass. However, we are at an early stage in the development of the scheme: more work will be
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Davenport Green to Ardwick
    High Speed Two Phase 2b ww.hs2.org.uk October 2018 Working Draft Environmental Statement High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report | Volume 2 | MA07 MA07: Davenport Green to Ardwick High Speed Two (HS2) Limited Two Snowhill, Snow Hill Queensway, Birmingham B4 6GA Freephone: 08081 434 434 Minicom: 08081 456 472 Email: [email protected] H10 hs2.org.uk October 2018 High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report MA07: Davenport Green to Ardwick H10 hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Two Snowhill Snow Hill Queensway Birmingham B4 6GA Telephone: 08081 434 434 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.hs2.org.uk A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2018, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with High Speed Two (HS2) Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Tall Buildings
    01/12 февраль/март Туманный важно быТь альбион: услышанным перезагрузка It is Important Foggy Albion: to be Heard Update курс на модернизацию The Tack for the Modernization начало эпохи меганебоскребов ngs i ld i Entering the Era of Megatall я» Tall bu я» Tall и Tall Buildings журнал высотных технологий 1/12 «Высотные здан международный Журнал обзор INTERNATIONAL«Высотные здания» OVERVIEW Tall buildings На обложке: проект башни R432, Мехико, иллюстрации предоставлены Rojkind Arquitectos Учредитель ООО «Скайлайн медиа» при участии ЗАО «Горпроект» и ЗАО «Высотпроект» Редакционная коллегия Сергей Лахман Надежда Буркова Юрий Софронов Петр Крюков Татьяна Печеная Святослав Доценко Елена Зайцева Александр Борисов Генеральный директор Сергей Лахман Содержание Главный редактор Концепция/Concept 84 Башня света Татьяна Никулина contents Исполнительный директор The Tower of Light Сергей Шелешнев Среда обитания/Habitat 86 Сафари по-аргентински Коротко/In brief 6 События и факты Редактор-переводчик Safari in Argentine Style Ирина Амирэджиби Events and Facts Редактор-корректор Алла Шугайкина управление Иллюстрации международный обзор MANAGEMENT Алексей Любимкин INTERNATIONAL OVERVIEW Дизайн Антон Ижбараев Актуально/Up to date 92 Юлия Илюнина: важно быть услышанным Над номером работали: История/History 20 Туманный Альбион: перезагрузка Марианна Маевская Julia Ilyunina: It is Important to be Heard Нина Насонова Foggy Albion: Update Отдел рекламы Cтиль/Style 28 Энергия «Изенгарда» строительство Тел./факс: (495) 545-2497 CONSTRUCTION The Energy of «Isengard» Отдел распространения Светлана Богомолова Опыт/Experience 34 Жемчужина улицы Старой ратуши Владимир Никонов Технологии/Technology 96 Советы специалиста Тел./факс: (495) 545-2497 The Pearl of Old Hall Street Адрес редакции Expert Advice архитектура 105005, Москва, и проектирование Материалы/Materials 98 Углепластиковые небоскребы наб.
    [Show full text]
  • The Promise of Public Realm: Urban Spaces in the Skyscraper City
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: The Promise of Public Realm: Urban Spaces in the Skyscraper City Author: Stephan Reinke, Director, Stephan Reinke Architects Limited Subjects: Architectural/Design Social Issues Urban Design Keywords: Mixed-Use Public Space Urban Design Vertical Urbanism Publication Date: 2015 Original Publication: Global Interchanges: Resurgence of the Skyscraper City Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Stephan Reinke The Promise of Public Realm: Urban Spaces in the Skyscraper City Abstract Stephan Reinke Director This paper will reveal the importance of integrating the Ground Plane, Mid-Level and Rooftop Stephan Reinke Architects Limited, Urban Public Spaces in the City. We will explore the NYLON New York/London axis of Urban London, United Kingdom Design, with London now emerging as a 21st C skyscraper city with 200 new towers. We will present the recent history of urban spaces together with a critical analysis of examples of successful Skyscraper City public realm and design of unsuccessful public spaces. Case studies of Working internationally for almost 30 years, Stephan has in-depth professional practice experience in The Promise Fulfilled vs The Promise Lost in NY and London will be featured. Our Objectives are Europe, the Middle East, North America and Asia. to communicate the essential requirement for well-designed public spaces in the Skyscraper City He has extensive mixed-use, residential, urban planning, hospitality and commercial experience to create vibrant and healthy communities; in summary, the key issues are: Urban public space and was Principal in Charge for the Marriott mixed- design as a commercial driver in the Skyscraper City; Promised Public spaces offered, to attain use complex at West India Quay, the Piccadilly Tower Urban Regeneration Scheme in Manchester and the planning/design review approval, which are not delivered.
    [Show full text]
  • Participants in the Conversation
    PARTICIPANTS IN THE CONVERSATION Those who contributed to the Architectural Record article: Lorraine King, AIA / 9th President AIA UK Chapter (2002) – Joined Heery International in London in 1982. Since 1991, worked as ‘trouble shooter’ consultant for multiple clients. Major projects since 1999 include: BBC Digital Headquarters; Blue Fin Building; 66 Chiltern Street; Chelsea Barracks (all in London); Ithra Centre for World Culture (KSA). (Visit AIA Profile HERE.) Lee Polisano, FAIA RIBA / Co-founded KPF’s London office in 1989. Joined PLP in 2009 as Founding Partner and President in 2009. Major projects since 1999 include: Heron Tower; Sky Central; Nova Victoria (London); Corso Como Place (Milan) (Visit Website HERE.) Stephan Reinke, FAIA RIBA / 1st President AIA UK Chapter (1994) – From 1988, worked for local UK architects until he joined HOK as Director in 1993. Was founding Principal/MD for Woods Bagot Europe Middle East Region from 2002. Started Stephan Reinke Architects in 2009. Major projects since 1999 include: West India Quay; Piccadilly Tower; 10 Trinity Square (all in London); HSE Generation {Manchester); Southern Cross (Melbourne); Raffles Swiss Hotel Complex (Moscow). (Visit Website HERE.) David Walker, RIBA / 2nd President AIA UK Chapter (1995) – Came to the UK with Swanke Hayden Connell in 1988 as Principle Designer. Founded David Walker Architects in 2002. Major projects in London since 1999 include: Coleman Street; Milton Court/The Heron; Riverbank House; Tenter House (in planning). (Visit Website HERE.) Those who were working in the UK at the time: Karen Cook, AIA / Came to London in 1990 with KPF. Joined PLP in2009 as Founding Partner. Major projects since 1999 include: Tour First (Paris); Danube House (Prague); 2-4 Cannon Street (London); 22 Bishopsgate (London).
    [Show full text]
  • National Rail Timetable Sunday 15 May 2016 to Saturday 10 December 2016
    National Rail Timetable Sunday 15 May 2016 to Saturday 10 December 2016 Britain's national railway network and stations are owned by Network Rail. Passenger services are operated by the Train Companies included in this Timetable, who work together closely to provide a co-ordinated National Rail network offering a range of travel opportunities. Details and identification codes are shown on the Train Operator pages. This Timetable contains rail services operated over the National Rail network, together with rail and shipping connections with Ireland, the Isle of Man, and the Isle of Wight. Network Rail operates managed stations; however the remainder are operated on their behalf by the Train Operating Companies. Details are shown in the Station Index. Contents Page Introduction 1 How to use this Timetable 2 General Information 3 Train Information, Telephone Enquiries 4 Rail Travel for Disabled Passengers 5 Seat reservations, Luggage, Cycles and Animals 6 Directory of Train Operators 8 Network Rail and Other addresses 11 How to Cross London 13 YOUR FEEDBACK IS VALUABLE TO US If you have any comments on the content of this book or feedback on how you feel it could be improved then please contact the Planning Publications Team by writing to: Planning Publications, Network Rail, The Quadrant: MK Elder Gate, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, MK9 1EN Or Email: [email protected] A BIG THANK YOU AGAIN TO ALL VOLUNTEERS We would again like to thank our numerous volunteers for your continued help and support throughout the timetable process. Thank you for giving your own valuable time to better the timetable.
    [Show full text]
  • Penalty Fares Penalty Fares Are Charged by Train Companies at Some Stations and on Some Trains
    National Rail Timetable Sunday 22 May 2011 to Saturday 10 December 2011 Britain's national railway network and stations are owned by Network Rail. Passenger services are operated by the Train Companies included in this Timetable, who work together closely to provide a co-ordinated National Rail network offering a range of travel opportunities. Details and identifi cation codes are shown on the Train Operator pages. This Timetable contains rail services operated over the National Rail network, together with rail and shipping connections with Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Isle of Wight and the Channel Islands. Network Rail operates managed stations however the remainder are operated on their behalf by the Train Operating Companies. Details are shown in the Station Index. The Timetable Network Map shows the number of the individual table for each route. Contents Page Introduction 1 What's New? 2–3 How to use this Timetable 4–5 General Information 6 Connections 7 Train Information, Telephone Enquiries 8–9 Rail Travel for Disabled Passengers 10 Seat Reservations, Luggage, Cycles and Animals 11 Directory of Train Operators 12–40 Network Rail and Other addresses 41–42 How to Cross London 43–44 Airport Links 45–48 Services on Public Holidays An amended service will operate on many parts of the rail network during Public Holidays and you are strongly advised to confi rm your journey details if travelling around a holiday period. For more information, visit nationalrail.co.uk/holidays Engineering Work It is sometimes necessary to carry out essential Engineering Work which means that services may be changed, particularly late at night or at weekends to allow this work to be carried out.
    [Show full text]
  • MBS Bids to Raise £50M
    CRAIN’S LIST Business associations ranked by Greater Manchester members Page 16 FOCUS Page 13 Meet the man bringing indoor alpine skiing to Trafford CRAI N’S CRAI N’S® MANCHESTER BUSINESS PROTOTYPE ISSUE, October 2007 CrainsManchesterBusiness.co.uk £2 What’s News MBS bids to raise £50m I Pink snooker tables are coming to Manchester’s Northern Quarter as part of a forthcoming explosion MBS, wants to see a £35m makeover He said the University of Man - Sue Marsden, managing director of new bars and live music venues. Business school could of the school’s buildings straddling chester authorities were comfortable of Lancaster-based Professional Crain’s understands that the be renamed if donor the junction of Booth Street and with naming MBS after a donor “if Fundraising Consultancy, says MBS respective owners of Common and Oxford Road. This will include a new the price is right”. has chosen a good time to seek a The King are to open a new venue stumps up enough upmarket hotel and conference facil - He would not be drawn on how major donor. each, offering live music. The own - ity plus new retail space. much it might cost – such arrange - “Manchester is thriving at the ers of M20 are also set to open a CRAIN’S STAFF REPORTER “I need to raise about £50m,” said ments can raise up to $100m in the moment and there has probably second Northern Quarter venue, with a 350 capacity, and city centre Luger. “We need to do a private-pub - US – but hopes to beat the £8m Sir never been a better time to be raising club One Central, owned by Ross Manchester Business School could lic partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCOMOMO Ibérico 2018
    Old Modernism, New Urbanism Michael Hebbert University College London We of the postwar baby boom are said to be surprised –even indignant– to find old age creeping up on us. We may stay out of the clutches of envejecimiento for longer than previous generations, but there’s no escaping it in the end. The buildings that grew up with us are also growing old and showing signs of wear and decay –but their life-cycle, unlike ours, allows for renewal and conserva- tion from one human generation to the next–. So yesterday’s avant-garde becomes today’s heritage. Once la ville du futur stood in radical contradiction to the existing urban fabric, embodying revolu- tionary principles of light, space, circulation, rational layout, standardised construction. Today its legacy has been absorbed into collective memory alongside all the older traces in the urban palimpsest –ancient, Roman, Mediaeval, Renaissance, Baroque, Nineteenth Century–. Of course much of the twentieth century legacy will be replaced over time but significant buildings and landscapes deserve recognition as heritage, with all the challenges implicit in retaining instrinsic character while adapting to new uses and contexts. All building uses change over time so –as Stewart Brand famously puts it (1994)– architecture must «learn» if it is to endure. Daniel Abramson’s recent study of Obsolescence (2016) highlights its peculiar history within modern architecture. He shows how pre-modern architectural theory lacked any concept of obsolescence, judging buildings by the eternal Vitrivian criteria of frmitatis, utilitatis and venustatis –firmness, commodity and delight–. Obsolescence entered architecture from nineteenth century accounting practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Employer Guide 2008 / the Top 75 Key and Methodology Page 22
    GEGp1 8builddr 8/10/08 13:15 Page 24 24 / good employer guide 2008 / the top 75 Key and methodology page 22 8build What makes us different Top projects We are built on ethics, trust and I EDF Trading London head Construction company integrity. We offer unique office, London Three-year-old 8build had a turnover of £44m last year and works solutions to an industry that The Royal British Legion primarily in London. Besides delivering fit-out, refurbishment and needs fresh ideas, and we make offices, London new-build projects, 8build offers strategic and financial advice. the building process easier for British Land offices, www.8build.co.uk clients and employees. London Top benefits Bonuses, regular social events, childcare vouchers Staff rating Key company facts Discretionary benefits 49 All staff 22 2% DCSP (NC) CSR Smarter Feel good Inspiration Leadership Ability to 2% working factor contribute AA Projects What makes us different Top projects We are a dynamic organisation I University Place, University Property consultant and focus on attracting and of Manchester Founded in 1999, AA Projects has a turnover of more than £7m. Its retaining high quality I Middlesbrough College, sectors include education, transport, health, residential, retail, local professionals. Our low attrition Middlehaven authority, arts and leisure. rate and high staff morale are I Liverpool Women’s Hospital, www.aaprojects.co.uk at the heart of our success. Liverpool Top benefits Profit share, residential conference, life assurance Staff rating Key company facts Discretionary benefits 76 All staff 28 Some staff 8% GPP (C) CSR Smarter Feel good Inspiration Leadership Ability to 5% working factor contribute Alumet Systems (UK) What makes us different Top projects Alumet is a family-run I Carnival House, Full facade solutions business.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Socio Economic Appraisal
    High Speed Rail: Consultation on the route from the West Midlands to Manchester, Leeds and beyond Sustainability Statement Appendix C: Socio Economic Appraisal A report by Temple-ERM for HS2 Ltd July 2013 Appendix C: Appraisal of Sustainability: HS2 Phase Two Socio-Economic Appraisal CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Background ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2. The proposed scheme ............................................................................................. 1 1.3. The opportunities of HS2 ......................................................................................... 1 1.4. Purpose of the Socio-Economic Assessment ........................................................... 2 1.5. Assessment methodology ........................................................................................ 3 1.6. Structure of the report .............................................................................................. 5 2. HS2 OBJECTIVES AND PROPOSED SCHEME DESCRIPTION ....................................... 6 2.1. The HS2 Phase Two proposed scheme ................................................................... 6 2.2. Direct employment as a result of HS2 Phase Two ................................................... 8 3. MANCHESTER AIRPORT HIGH SPEED STATION ........................................................... 9
    [Show full text]
  • Tyler Women Walking Manchester
    tyler Women Walking Manchester: Desire Lines Through The “Original Modern” City By Morag Lillian Rose A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Sheffield Faculty of Social Sciences Department of Urban Studies and Planning 2017 P a g e | 2 Acknowledgements The Flâneur is an illusion and so is the notion of a thesis completed in isolation. My heartfelt thanks to all the colleagues, friends and fellow travellers who have inspired, supported and enabled me to produce this work. In particular, I would like to gratefully acknowledge: Everyone in the Department of Urban Studies and Planning at the University of Sheffield who co-create a stimulating, collegial and productive environment. Particular thanks to my Supervisor Professor Rowland Atkinson for critical questions, support and changing my perspective; in short being an excellent supervisor. Thanks also to Dr Tom Moore, Dr Lee Crookes, Dr Steve Connelly, Professor John Flint, Dr Suzi Hall, Clea Carroll, Keely Armitage, all my fellow PGRs for comments, debate and friendship and my thesis mentor Dr Emily Goodall. I will be forever grateful to the wonderful Dr Victoria Henshaw for her belief in me and her suggestion I should do a PhD at Sheffield. Special thanks to all my research participants who shared their time and their stories so generously and who taught me so much. The LRM (Loiterers Resistance Movement) dérive every month in Manchester and I am touched by all who wander and wonder with me on First Sundays and beyond, on the streets and in cyberspace.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 15/12/2010, 18.00
    Notice of meeting of Taxi Licensing Policy Task Group To: Councillors Watt (Chair), Merrett and Vassie Date: Wednesday, 15 December 2010 Time: 6.00 pm Venue: The Guildhall, York A G E N D A 1. Declarations of Interest At this point Members are asked to declare any personal or prejudicial interests they may have in the business on the agenda. 2. Minutes (Pages 3 - 6) To approve and sign the minutes of the meeting held on 15 November 2010. 3. Public Participation At this point in the meeting, members of the public who have registered their wish to speak regarding an item on the agenda or an issue within the committee’s remit can do so. The deadline for registering is 5.00 pm on Tuesday 14 December 2010. 4. Taxi Licensing Policy Review - Interim (Pages 7 - 36) Report This report presents information gathered in support of this review and asks Members to agree details for carrying out consultation on the issues identified within the report and identify any further information required in support of this review. 5. Any Other Business which the Chair considers urgent under the Local Government Act 1972 Democracy Officer: Name: Jayne Carr Contact Details: Telephone – (01904) 552030 Email – [email protected] For more information about any of the following please contact the Democracy Officer responsible for servicing this meeting • Registering to speak • Written Representations • Business of the meeting • Any special arrangements • Copies of reports Page 1 Agenda Annex About City of York Council Meetings Would you like to speak at this meeting? If you would, you will need to: • register by contacting the Democracy Officer (whose name and contact details can be found on the agenda for the meeting) no later than 5.00 pm on the last working day before the meeting; • ensure that what you want to say speak relates to an item of business on the agenda or an issue which the committee has power to consider (speak to the Democracy Officer for advice on this); • find out about the rules for public speaking from the Democracy Officer.
    [Show full text]