Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Expert Group on environmental risks of hazardous SUBMERGED 4-2016 submerged objects Tallinn, Estonia 12-14 April 2016 Document title Assessing the Impact of Underwater Clearance of Unexploded Ordnance on Harbour Porpoises in the Southern North Sea Code 3-2 Category INF Agenda Item 3 – Warfare materials Submission date 29.3.2016 Submitted by Germany Reference Action requested The Meeting is invited to take note of the attached information. Page 1 of 1 Aquatic Mammals 2015, 41(4), 503-523, DOI 10.1578/AM.41.4.2015.503 Assessing the Impact of Underwater Clearance of Unexploded Ordnance on Harbour Porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in the Southern North Sea Alexander M. von Benda-Beckmann,1 Geert Aarts,2, 3 H. Özkan Sertlek,4, 5 Klaus Lucke,2, 6 Wim C. Verboom,7 Ronald A. Kastelein,8 Darlene R. Ketten,9 Rob van Bemmelen,2 Frans-Peter A. Lam,1 Roger J. Kirkwood,2 and Michael A. Ainslie1, 10 1 TNO Acoustics and Sonar, Oude Waalsdorperweg 63, 2597 AK, The Hague, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] 2IMARES, Wageningen UR, Zuiderhaaks 5, 1797 SH ’t, Horntje, The Netherlands 3Department of Aquatic Ecology & Water Quality Management (AEW), Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Building 100, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands 4Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Sylviusweg 72, 2333 BE, Leiden, The Netherlands 5Electronics Engineering Department, Gebze Institute of Technology, PO Box 141, 41400, Gebze, Turkey 6Centre for Marine Science & Technology, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia 7JunoBioacoustics, Dorpsstraat 1-a, 1731 RA, Winkel, The Netherlands 8SEAMARCO, Julianalaan 46, 3843 CC, Harderwijk, The Netherlands 9Hanse Wissenschaftskollegg Institute for Advanced Studies, Neurosciences and Marine Sciences, Delmenhorst, 27753 Germany 10Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK Abstract harbour porpoise predicted to have received suffi- cient sound exposure to cause permanent hearing Large amounts of legacy unexploded ordnance loss). This study is the first to address the impacts (UXO) are still present in the North Sea. UXO are of underwater explosions on the population scale frequently accidentally encountered by fishermen of a marine mammal species. The methodology is and dredging vessels. Out of concern for human applicable to other studies on the effects of under- safety and to avoid damage to equipment and water explosions on the marine environment. infrastructure from uncontrolled explosions, most reported UXO found in the Dutch Continental Key Words: underwater explosions, harbour Shelf (DCS) are detonated in a controlled way. porpoise, Phocoena phocoena, hearing loss, These underwater detonations produce high marine acoustics, anthropogenic noise, Dutch amplitude shock waves that may adversely affect Continental Shelf marine mammals. The most abundant marine mammal in the DCS is the harbour porpoise Introduction (Phocoena phocoena), a species demonstrated to be highly sensitive to sound. Therefore, an Large numbers of unexploded ordnance (UXO), assessment of potential impacts of underwater such as aerial bombs, ammunition, mines, and explosions on harbour porpoises was undertaken. torpedoes, mostly legacies of World War II, Information regarding UXO cleared in the DCS remain in the North Sea. UXO are frequently provided by the Netherlands Ministry of Defence accidentally encountered by fishermen and dredg- was used in a propagation model to produce sound ing vessels (OSPAR Commission, 2010). There is exposure maps. These were combined with esti- a societal need for clearance of UXO as they pose mates of exposure levels predicted to cause hear- a risk to offshore activities such as fishing, dredg- ing loss in harbour porpoises and survey-based ing, and pipe-laying. For example, in 2005, three models of harbour porpoise seasonal distribution Dutch fishermen were killed by a bomb that was on the DCS. It was estimated that in a 1-y period, caught in their net and exploded on deck (OSPAR the 88 explosions that occurred in the DCS very Commission, 2010). The Royal Netherlands Navy likely caused 1,280, and possibly up to 5,450, (RNLN) is tasked with clearing UXO from the permanent hearing loss events (i.e., instances of a Dutch Continental Shelf (DCS) and executes on 504 von Benda-Beckmann et al. average approximately 120 underwater detona- could produce significant population-level conse- tions per year. quences (National Research Council, 2005). Underwater detonations of explosives pro- The objective of this study was to assess the duce some of the highest peak sound pressures potential impact of underwater explosions due to of all underwater anthropogenic sound sources. clearance activities of UXO on North Sea harbour The number of underwater detonations in the porpoises. Sound levels were estimated for explo- North Sea, as well as their high intensity shock sions in shallow water, which were then compared waves and sound levels, has raised concerns about to risk thresholds and distributions of harbour por- their impact on marine life (Nützel, 2008; Ainslie poises. It was decided to focus on explosion levels et al., 2009; Camphuysen & Siemensma, 2011; high enough to cause hearing loss in harbour por- Koschinski, 2012). The high amplitude shock poises, which are likely to occur at lower levels waves and the attendant sound wave produced by than possible direct traumatic injuries. Potential underwater detonations of UXO have the potential behavioural responses of harbour porpoises to to cause injury or death to marine vertebrates and single explosion events were not considered in invertebrates (e.g., Ketten et al., 1993; Richardson this study. A paucity of observations of wild har- et al., 1995; Lewis, 1996; Ketten, 2004, 2012; bour porpoise responses to explosions (single Danil & St. Leger, 2011). sound transients) made it impossible to address the The harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) severity of responses to single explosion events. is the most abundant marine mammal species Since there is a lack of acoustic measurements in the DCS and adjacent waters. In recent years, for large explosions (charge mass much larger than the harbour porpoise population has undergone a 1 kg TNT equivalent) in shallow waters (bottom redistribution across its North Sea range result- depths less than 50 m) (Weston, 1960; Chapman, ing in an increase in abundance in Dutch waters 1985; Soloway & Dahl, 2014), measurements (Camphuysen, 2011), with some 10,000s of ani- of sound produced by several large underwater mals now present (Geelhoed et al., 2012). explosives in shallow water environments were Harbour porpoises have sensitive hearing, carried out. These measurements were used to making them potentially exceptionally vulner- correct deep water source models for explo- able to noise-induced effects from anthropogenic sions and were used in combination with a shal- sound-producing activities at sea (Culik et al., low water propagation model to generate maps 2001; Kastelein et al., 2002, 2010, 2012a, 2012b, of received sound exposure level (SEL) for the 2013, 2014a, 2014b, 2015a, 2015b; Ketten, 2004; reported explosions in 2010 and 2011. Reported Lucke et al., 2009; Tougaard et al., 2009). The levels of impulsive sound that cause blast injury to main potential effects of concern of underwater harbour porpoises were reviewed (Ketten, 2004) explosions on an individual animal are (1) trauma to determine a range of onset thresholds at which (from direct or indirect blast wave effect injury) explosions are expected to cause permanent hear- such as crushing, fracturing, hemorrhages, and ing loss. Herein, permanent hearing loss refers to rupture of body tissues caused by the blast wave, a permanent reduction (at least partial) in hearing resulting in immediate or eventual mortality; capability resulting from the blast wave or acous- (2) auditory impairment (from exposure to the tic components of the explosion. acoustic wave), resulting in a temporary or per- The sound propagation maps, available risk manent hearing loss such as temporary threshold thresholds, and aerial survey derived harbour por- shift (TTS) and permanent threshold shift (PTS); poise density estimates (Geelhoed et al., 2012; or (3) behavioural change, such as disturbance to Aarts et al., in prep.) were combined to obtain an feeding, mating, breeding, and resting. Studies estimate of the annual number of possible impact of blast effects on cetaceans indicate that smaller events (i.e., instances of a harbour porpoise re- species are at greatest risk for shock wave or blast ceiving sufficient sound exposure to cause hearing injuries (Ketten, 2004). loss). The estimated number of impact events were Underwater sound plays an important role in used to discuss the implications of UXO clearance the lives of harbour porpoises. They use sound for the North Sea harbour porpoise population. actively and passively for social interaction, com- munication, navigation, predator avoidance, and foraging (Tyack, 2008; Clausen et al., 2010). Inter- Methods ference or impairment of their hearing ability as Overview of Clearance Activities by the RNLN in a result of underwater explosions, therefore, may the Southern North Sea directly or indirectly affect their reproduction and Since 2005, the RNLN has recorded the approxi- longevity. For instance, loss of important social mate location, type of ordnance, and date of deto- bonds due to impaired communication