DOCSLIB.ORG

A Revision of the Genus <I>Anisostena</I> Weise

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Revision of the Genus <I>Anisostena</I> Weise University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida September 1994 A revision of the genus Anisostena Weise (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Hispinae). Part Ill. The pilatei species group C. L. Staines Edgewater, Maryland Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Staines, C. L., "A revision of the genus Anisostena Weise (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Hispinae). Part Ill. The pilatei species group" (1994). Insecta Mundi. 293. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/293 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Vol. 8. No. 3 - 4, Se~tember- December, 1994 213 A revision of the genus Anisostena Weise (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Hispinae). Part Ill. The pilatei species group C. L. Staines 3302 Decker Place Edgewater, Maryland 21 037 U.S.A. Abstract The pilatei species group of Anisostena s. str. is revised. Lectotoypes are designated for A. nunenmacheri, A. pilatei, and A. trilineata; A. mitchelli is synonymized with A. arizonica; A. confusa and A. vittata are described as new. Key words: Anisostena, lectotype, revision, new species. Introduction 2. Pronotum with basal impression .........................3 Pronotum without basal impression ................... 6 This is the third in a series of articles revising the genus Anisostena. The first article (Staines, 3. Vertex of head punctate ............. trilineata (Baly) 1993) summarized the work on the genus and Vertex of head not punctate ................................. 4 revised the subgenera Neostena andApostena. The second article (Staines, 1994) divided the subgenus 4. Antennal segment I11 distinctly longer than I1 . Anisostena s. str. into three species groups and ........................................ vittata New Species revised the ariadne species group. Antennal segments I1 and I11 subequal in length Types were examined for all species except A. scapularis. Lectotypes are designated for A. 5. Pronoturn wider than long ..............pilatei (Baly) nunenmacheri, A. pilatei, and A. trilineata. In Pronotum longer than wide ..............................:..... recording the label data from type specimens, a ...................................... promta fasciata Maulik slash (1) divides data on different labels. Measurements were taken with an ocular mi- 6. Antenna1 segment I1 longer than I11 ..................... crometer. Pronotal length and width were taken ..................................................suturalis (Weise) along the midlines. Elytral width was measured at Antenna1 segment I11 longer than I1 ...................7 the humeri. Elytral length was measured form the Antennal segments I1 and I11 subequal in length base to apex. Total length was measured from the base of the frontal sulcus to the apex of the elytra. 7. Faint longitudinal suclus on pronotal disc; vertex of head with median sulcus; pronotum longer The pilatei species group than wide .......................nunenmacheri (Weise) Members of the pilatei species group are distin- Pronotum without longitudinal sulcus; vertex of guished by thevittate or maculate elytra. Members head without sulcus; pronotum wider than long of this species group are known from Kansas to ...................................................... gracilis (Horn) Argentina. 8. Head with median sulcus faint; punctures present near eyes; pronotum longer than wide ............. Key to the species of the pilatei group ....................................... promta promta (Weise) Head with median sulcus distinct; no punctures 1. Elytra vittate ..........................................................4 near eyes; pronotum wider than long .............9 Elytra maculate ....................scapularis Uhmann Insecta Mundi 9. Mesofemur serrate; antennal segment I1 wider than 111; frons projecting ..................................... ........................................ confusa New Species Mesofemur not serrate; antennal segments I1 and I11 same width; frons not projecting ................. ..............................................arizonica Schaeffer Anisostena arizonica Schaeffer Map 1 Anisostena arizonica Schaeffer 1933: 103. Holotype: Ari[zona]l arizonica Schaeffer Coll. Holotype, 1935 Barber1 Charles Schaeffer Collection1 HS Barber Bequest 19501 Anisostena arizonica Schaeffer (USNM). Papp 1953:58; Uhmann 1957:73; Wilcox 1975: 140. Anisostena mitchelli White 1939:55; Papp 1953:59; Uhmann 1957:74; Wilcox 1975:140. NEW SYN- ONYMY. Description: Body color brown with dark sutural vitta. Head: median sulcuspresent; sulcus on inner margin of each eye; vertex micropunctate. Anten- nae brown, segments 1-111 lighter than rest; seg- ment I subglobose; segments 11- I11 cylindrical, subequalin width andlength; IV-X transverse, VII- X wider than preceding; XI pointed at apex; frons projecting at base of antennae; frons punctate; Map 1. Distribution of Anisostena species: arizonica apical margin of clypeus darkened; sides of head (triangles), nunenmacheri (squares). alutaceous. Pronotum: apical margin black; aluta- ceous between punctures; covered with large, shal- low punctures; margined laterally; basal margin Distribution: Arizona, California, and Mexico. bisinuate; longer than wide; basal impression ab- sent; lateral margins divergent from base to apex; Specimens examined: MEXICO: Nuevo Leon: 29 no tooth in anterior angles; length 0.7 mm (n=4); km W. Linares, 2400 ft., 3-VI- 1983 (ISAC). UNITED width 0.7-0.9mm (avg. 0.8). Scutellum: black; quad- STATES: Arizona: no further data (USNM). Pima Co.- rate; alutaceous. Elytra: suturalvitta reachespunc- Arivaca, 26- VII-1941 (SEMC). St. Cruz Co.- 3 mi. E ture row 1; scutellar row of 3 punctures; elytral Pena Blanca, 19-20-VII-1978 (AJGC); Ruby, 13- VII- 1940 (SEMC); Sycamore Can., 4000,ll-IV- 1970 (USNM). punctures in adjacent rows overlap or touch; lat- California: Inyo Co.- Lone Pine, 2-V-1937 (CASC). eral and apical margins smooth; apices individually Kansas: Barbour Co.- 1468 ft., 1916 (SEMC). Texas rounded; intervals 2, 4, and 6 costate, interval 6 Jeff Davis Co.- H. 0. Canyon, Davis Mts., 5-VII-1968, most pronounced; intervals 2 and 6 unite on apical 6200 ft. (TAMU). Total: 11. fifth, 4 does not attain union by the diameter of Specimens collected in dry oak forest. threepunctures; length 2.4-2.8mm (avg. 2.6); width 1.0-1.3 mm (avg. 1.1). Legs: brown; tibia with ring of setae at apex; femur darker at apex, mesofemur not Anisostena confusa new species serrate on inner margin; last tarsal segment dark. Venter: prosternum brown; meso-, and metasterna Map 2 black, alutaceous; abdomen brown. Total length: Figure 1 3.6 mm (avg. 3.4). Types: Holotype: Guayana Francesal F. Monros Col- Larval host plant: unknown. lection 19591 Holotype Anisostena confusa Staines, det. C. L. Staines 1990 (red label) (USNM). Paratype (male): Vol. 8, No. 3 - 4, Septcmbcr - Dcccmbcr, 1994 quadrate; alutaceous. Elytra: yellow with black sutural and lateralvittac; sutural vitta reaches to 1sL punclure row; IaLeral vitta from lateral margin to 6th interspace; scutellar row of 2 punctures; intervals 2,4, and 6 costate, 2 and 6 unite on apical Bth, 4 does not attain union by the diameter of a puncture; punctures touching or overlapping those in adjacent rows; lateral margins sparsely serrate; apical margin dentate; surface between punctures alutaceous; length 2.7-2.8mm (avg. 2.75); width 1.1-1.3 mm (avg. 1.2). Venter: prosternum yellow; meso- and metasterna yellow in middle, dark later- ally; abdominal sterna 1-2 yellow in middle, dark laterally; 3-5 brownish. Legs: femur yellow at base, dark for apical two-thirds, punctate; tibia dark, tuft of setaeon inner apical margin; mesofemur serrate on inner margin; tarsi dark. Total length: 3.6 mm. Larval host plant: unknown. Distribution: Ecuador and Venezuela. Specimens examined: ECUADOR. Guayas Prov.. San Antonio. 3 km S Manglerelto, 12-11-1987 (USNM). Figure 1. Habitus of Anisostenu confusa FRENCH GUYANA: no further data (USNM). MEXICO: Colima - 2 mi. SE Tecoman, 20.VII.1966 Ecuador: Guayas Pmv., San Antonio, sea level, 3 km S (TAMU). Morelos- 4.4 mi. E Cuernavaca, 6-8-Vll-1974 Manglaralto, 12 Feb. 1987, K. A. Johnson colr.1 Paratype (TAMU). VENEZUELA: Bolivar, 520 Guri Dam, 16-XI- Anisostena confusa Staines, det. C. L. Staines 1989 (red 1974 (T)FFVJ. Tot.al: 5. label) (CLS). Paratype: Ven[ezuela], Bolfvar, 520 Guri Dam, 16-XI-1974, M. Murlaughl Paratype Anisostena wnfusa Staines, det. C. L. Staines 1989 (red label) Anisostena gracilis (Horn) (DEFW). Paratype: Mexico: Morelos, 4.4 mi. E. Cuernavaca, July 6-8, 1974, Clark, Murrary, Ashe, Map 3 Schaffnerl Paratype Anisostena confusa Staines, det. C. L. Stnines 1990 (red label) (TAMU). Paratype: 2 mi. se. Charinknn gmcilis Horn 1883:298. Holotype: Colum- Tecoman, Col., Mex., VII-20-66, P. M. & P. K. Wagner1 bus, Texas, 21Nl MCZC type no. 8217 (MCZC). Paratype Anisostena wnfusa Steines, det. C. L. Staines Amplitis gracilis (Horn). Weise 1911a:22, 1911b:33; 1990 (red label) (TAW. Leng 1920:303: Uhmann 1957378. Odontota gmcilis (Horn). Butts 1969: 14. Description: Head: black; median sulcus present; Suwitrosis gmcilis (Horn). Wiloox 1975141. vertex alutaceous; sulcus present on inner margin Anisoslena gracilis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Djvu Document
    Vol. 8, No.3· 4, September· December, 1994 213 A revision of the genus An;sostena weise (Coleoptera. Chrysomelidae, Hispinae). Part III. The pilatei species group C. L. Staines 3302 Decker Place Edgewater, Maryland 21037 U.S.A. Abstract The pilatei species group ofAnisostena s. str. is revised. Lectotoypes are designated for A. nunenmacheri, A. pilatei, and A. trilineata, A. mitchelli is synonymized with A. al izonica, A. cOlt/usa and A. vittata are described as new. Key words: Anisostena, lectotype, revision, new species. Introduction 2. Pronotum with basal impression 3 Pronotum without basal impression 6 This is the third in a series of articles revising the genus Anisostena The first article (Staines, 3. Vertex of head punctate tl ilineata (Daly) 1993) summarized the work on the genus and Vertex of head not punctate 4 revIsed the subgeneraNeostena andApostena. The second article (Staines, 1994) divided the subgenus 4. Antennal segment III distinctly longer than II . Anisostena s. str. into three species groups and .. vittata New Species revised the ariadne species group Antennal segments II and III suhequal in length Types were examined for all species except A. ............................................................................... 5 scapularis. Lectotypes are designated fOr 4. 5. Pronotum wider than long pilatei (Baly) nunenmacheri, A. pilatei, and A. trilineata. In Pronotum longer than wide recording the label data from type specimens, a ...................................... promta fasciata Maulik slash (f) mv ides data on different labels. Measurements were taken with an ocular mi­ 6. Antennal segment II longer than 111.. crometer Pranotal length and width were taken .................................. suturalis (Weise) along the midlines. Elytral width was measured at Antennal segment III longer than II 7 the humeri.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Annotated Checklist and Evaluation of the Diversity of the Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 19, No. 1-2, March-June, 2005 89 A preliminary annotated checklist and evaluation of the diversity of the Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) of the Baja California peninsula, Mexico Fred G. Andrews California Department of Food and Agriculture Plant Health & Pest Prevention, Analysis & Identification 3294 Meadowview Road Sacramento, California 95832 Arthur J. Gilbert California Department of Food and Agriculture Plant Health & Pest Prevention, Pest Detection/Emergency Projects 2889 N. Larkin #106 Fresno, California 93727 Abstract. A preliminary annotated checklist of the Chrysomelidae of the Baja California peninsula, Mexico is presented based on literature records and the examination of approximately 16,000 chrysomelid specimens. Seven subfamilies and 218 described species have been identified. Ninty-one species are recognized from the Baja California peninsula for the first time. Twenty-nine species are listed as endemic. An additional 128 morphospecies have been identified as undescribed or not yet associated with described species of mainland Mexico or the United States. Adult host plant associations have been identified for approximately 120 species or 35% of the leaf beetle fauna of the region. Each of the 218 described species is associated with the eight plant communities as outlined by Wiggins (1980). Two dominant subfamilies comprise 76% of the leaf beetle fauna: Galerucinae, 87 species (40%) and Cryptocephalinae, 78 species (36%). The following new combinations are proposed: Neolema californica (Heinze, 1927), transferred from Lema Fabricius, 1798; Pseudoluperus histrio (Horn, 1895), transferred from Keitheatus Wilcox, 1965, and Diachus peninsularis (Schaeffer, 1906), transferred from Triachus J. L. LeConte, 1880. Lema peninsulae Crotch, 1873, is removed from synonymy with L.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of North America
    Insects of Western North America 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 2 Insects of Western North America. 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa by Boris C. Kondratieff, Luke Myers, and Whitney S. Cranshaw C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 22, 2011 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity. Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 3 Cover Photo Credits: Whitney S. Cranshaw. Females of the blow fly Cochliomyia macellaria (Fab.) laying eggs on an animal carcass on Fort Sill, Oklahoma. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1177. Copyrighted 2011 4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................7 SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of the Idaho National Laboratory: a Compilation and Review
    Insects of the Idaho National Laboratory: A Compilation and Review Nancy Hampton Abstract—Large tracts of important sagebrush (Artemisia L.) Major portions of the INL have been burned by wildfires habitat in southeastern Idaho, including thousands of acres at the over the past several years, and restoration and recovery of Idaho National Laboratory (INL), continue to be lost and degraded sagebrush habitat are current topics of investigation (Ander- through wildland fire and other disturbances. The roles of most son and Patrick 2000; Blew 2000). Most restoration projects, insects in sagebrush ecosystems are not well understood, and the including those at the INL, are focused on the reestablish- effects of habitat loss and alteration on their populations and ment of vegetation communities (Anderson and Shumar communities have not been well studied. Although a comprehen- 1989; Williams 1997). Insects also have important roles in sive survey of insects at the INL has not been performed, smaller restored communities (Williams 1997) and show promise as scale studies have been concentrated in sagebrush and associated indicators of restoration success in shrub-steppe (Karr and communities at the site. Here, I compile a taxonomic inventory of Kimberling 2003; Kimberling and others 2001) and other insects identified in these studies. The baseline inventory of more habitats (Jansen 1997; Williams 1997). than 1,240 species, representing 747 genera in 212 families, can be The purpose of this paper is to present a taxonomic list of used to build models of insect diversity in natural and restored insects identified by researchers studying cold desert com- sagebrush habitats. munities at the INL.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Report on the Leaf Beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of Cove Point LNG Property and Vicinity, Calvert County, Maryland
    Survey Report on the Leaf Beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of Cove Point LNG Property and Vicinity, Calvert County, Maryland Prepared by Joseph F. Cavey June 2004 Survey Report on the Leaf Beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of Cove Point LNG Property and Vicinity, Calvert County, Maryland Joseph F. Cavey 6207 Guthrie Court Eldersburg, Maryland 21784 Submitted June 2004 Abstract A survey was funded by the Cove Point Natural Heritage Trust to document the leaf beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of the Cove Point Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Limited Partnership Site in Calvert County, Maryland. The survey was conducted during periods of seasonal beetle activity from March 2002 to October 2003. The survey detected 92 leaf beetle species, including two species not formerly recorded for the State of Maryland and 55 additional species new to Calvert County. The detection of the rare flea beetle, Glyptina maritima Fall, represents only the third recorded collection of this species and the only recorded collection in the past 32 years. Dichanthelium (Panicum) dichromatum (L.) Gould is reported as the larval host plant of the leaf-mining hispine beetle Glyphuroplata pluto (Newman), representing the first such association for this beetle. Introduction This manuscript summarizes work completed in a two year survey effort begun in March 2002 to document the leaf beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of the Cove Point Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Limited Partnership Site in Calvert County, Maryland, USA. Fieldwork for this study was conducted under contract with the Cove Point Natural Heritage Trust, dated February 28, 2002. One of the largest insect families, the Chrysomelidae, or leaf beetles, contains more than 37,000 species worldwide, including some 1,700 North American species (Jolivet 1988, Riley et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouriensis
    ISSN 2576-2338 (online) Missouriensis Journal of the Missouri Native Plant Society Volume 35 2018 effectively published online 29 January 2018 Missouriensis, Volume 35 (2018) Journal of the Missouri Native Plant Society EDITOR Douglas Ladd Missouri Botanical Garden P.O. Box 299 St. Louis, MO 63110 email: [email protected] MISSOURI NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY https://monativeplants.org PRESIDENT VICE-PRESIDENT John Oliver Dana Thomas 4861 Gatesbury Dr. 1530 E. Farm Road 96 St. Louis, MO 63128 Springfield, MO 65803 314.487.5924 317.430.6566 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] SECRETARY TREASURER Malissa Briggler Bob Siemer 102975 County Rd. 371 74 Conway Cove Drive New Bloomfield, MO 65043 Chesterfield, MO 63017 573.301.0082 636.537.2466 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT WEBMASTER Paul McKenzie Brian Edmond 2311 Grandview Circle 8878 N Farm Road 75 Columbia, MO 65203 Walnut Grove, MO 65770 573.445.3019 417.742.9438 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] BOARD MEMBERS Steve Buback, St. Joseph (2018-2021); email: [email protected] Ron Colatskie, Festus (2016-2019); email: [email protected] Rick Gray, St. Louis (2018-2021); email: [email protected] Bruce Schuette, Troy (2016-2019); email: [email protected] Mike Skinner, Republic (2017-2020); email: [email protected] Justin Thomas, Springfield (2017-2020); email: [email protected] i FROM THE EDITOR Welcome to the second online edition of Missouriensis, the official technical publication of the Missouri Native Plant Society (MONPS). After some unexpected delays, the journal has now been assigned official International Standard Serial Numbers (ISSN) for both the electronic editions such as this issue (ISSN 2576-2338) and retroactively for previous print issues (ISSN 2576-2311).
    [Show full text]
  • In the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution
    Type Specimens of Hispinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution CHARLES L. STAINES and SUSAN L. STAINES I W9\ I SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 585 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Folklife Studies Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world of science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Chrysomela from 1979 to 2003 Newsletters 1 Through 42
    Literature on the Chrysomelidae From CHRYSOMELA Newsletter, numbers 1-42 October 1979 through June 2003 (2,852 citations) Terry N. Seeno, Past Editor The following citations appeared in the CHRYSOMELA process and rechecked for accuracy, the list undoubtedly newsletter beginning with the first issue published in 1979. contains errors. Revisions will be numbered sequentially. Because the literature on leaf beetles is so expansive, Adobe InDesign 2.0 was used to prepare and distill these citations focus mainly on biosystematic references. the list into a PDF file, which is searchable using standard They were taken directly from the publication, reprint, or search procedures. If you want to add to the literature in author’s notes and not copied from other bibliographies. this bibliography, please contact the newsletter editor. All Even though great care was taken during the data entering contributors will be acknowledged. Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1968. Phyllobrotica decorata DuPortei, Cassidinae) em condições de laboratório. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 30(1): a new sub-species of the Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) with 105-113, 7 figs., 2 tabs. a review of the species of Phyllobrotica in the Lyman Museum Collec- tion. Entomol. Mon. Mag. 104(1244-1246):4-9, 32 figs. Alegre, C. and E. Petitpierre. 1982. Chromosomal findings on eight species of European Cryptocephalus. Experientia 38:774-775, 11 figs. Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1969. Abnormal elytra, wings and other structures in a female Trirhabda virgata (Chrysomelidae) with a Alegre, C. and E. Petitpierre. 1984. Karyotypic Analyses in Four summary of similar teratological observations in the Coleoptera. Dtsch. Species of Hispinae (Col.: Chrysomelidae).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the RESTRUCTURING of ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS in RESPONSE to PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell a Dissertation Submitt
    THE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS IN RESPONSE TO PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell 1 A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Winter 2019 © Adam B. Mitchell All Rights Reserved THE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS IN RESPONSE TO PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell Approved: ______________________________________________________ Jacob L. Bowman, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Approved: ______________________________________________________ Mark W. Rieger, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Approved: ______________________________________________________ Douglas J. Doren, Ph.D. Interim Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Douglas W. Tallamy, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Charles R. Bartlett, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Jeffery J. Buler, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated List of Insects and Other Arthropods
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Text errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Invertebrates of the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Western Cascade Range, Oregon. V: An Annotated List of Insects and Other Arthropods Gary L Parsons Gerasimos Cassis Andrew R. Moldenke John D. Lattin Norman H. Anderson Jeffrey C. Miller Paul Hammond Timothy D. Schowalter U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, Oregon November 1991 Parson, Gary L.; Cassis, Gerasimos; Moldenke, Andrew R.; Lattin, John D.; Anderson, Norman H.; Miller, Jeffrey C; Hammond, Paul; Schowalter, Timothy D. 1991. Invertebrates of the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, western Cascade Range, Oregon. V: An annotated list of insects and other arthropods. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-290. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 168 p. An annotated list of species of insects and other arthropods that have been col- lected and studies on the H.J. Andrews Experimental forest, western Cascade Range, Oregon. The list includes 459 families, 2,096 genera, and 3,402 species. All species have been authoritatively identified by more than 100 specialists. In- formation is included on habitat type, functional group, plant or animal host, relative abundances, collection information, and literature references where available. There is a brief discussion of the Andrews Forest as habitat for arthropods with photo- graphs of representative habitats within the Forest. Illustrations of selected ar- thropods are included as is a bibliography. Keywords: Invertebrates, insects, H.J. Andrews Experimental forest, arthropods, annotated list, forest ecosystem, old-growth forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaf-Mining Chrysomelids 1 Leaf-Mining Chrysomelids
    Leaf-mining chrysomelids 1 Leaf-mining chrysomelids Jorge A. Santiago-Blay Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.” (Act I, Scene 5, Lines 66-167) “To be or not to be; that is the question” (Act III, Section 1, Line 58) both quotes from “The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark” by William Shakespeare (1564-1616) Abstract into two morphological categories: the eruciform, less modi- fied type (Galerucinae and some Alticinae); and the flattened, Leaf-mining is the relatively prolonged consumption of foliar sometimes onisciform type characteristic of the Zeugophorinae, material contained within the epidermal layers, without elicit- many Alticinae, the Cassidinae, and the Hispinae. There are ing a major histological response from the plant. This type of no published data on the larval structure of leaf-mining herbivory is relatively uncommon in the Chrysomelidae and criocerines. Larval leaf-mining chrysomelids are reported to has been reported in 103 genera, representing 4% of the ap- have rather broad host-plant feeding preferences. For adults, proximately 2600 described genera and amounting to over the ranges are broader. The Index of Feeding Range (IFR) is 500 reported species, or 1-2% of the 40-50,000 described introduced herein as a scalar to quantify the feeding range of species. Larvae in the following subfamilies are known leaf- the larvae (IFRi) and adults (IFRa). For the Zeugophorinae, miners, with numbers and percentages of taxa also being in- IFRi is 2.0 and IFRa 2.9.
    [Show full text]
  • References Van Aarde, R
    Hispine References Van Aarde, R. J., S. M. Ferreira, J. J. Kritzinger, P. J. van Dyk, M. Vogt, & T. D. Wassenaar. 1996. An evaluation of habitat rehabilitation on coastal dune forests in northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Restoration Ecology 4(4):334-345. Abbott, W. S. 1925. Locust leaf miner (Chalepus doraslis Thunb.). United States Department of Agriculture Bureau of Entomology Insect Pest Survey Bulletin 5:365. Abo, M. E., M. N. Ukwungwu, & A. Onasanya. 2002. The distribution. Incidence, natural reservoir host and insect vectors of rice yellow mottle virus (RYMV), genus Sobemovirus in northern Nigeria. Tropicultura 20(4):198-202. Abo, M. E. & A. A. Sy. 1997. Rice virus diseases: Epidemiology and management strategies. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 11(2/3):113-134. Abdullah, M. & S. S. Qureshi. 1969. A key to the Pakistani genera and species of Hispinae and Cassidinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), with description of new species from West Pakistan including economic importance. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 12:95-104. Achard, J. 1915. Descriptions de deux Coléoptères Phytophages nouveaux de Madagascar. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 1915:309-310. Achard, J. 1917. Liste des Hispidae recyeillis par M. Favarel dans la region du Haut Chari. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 86:63-72. Achard, J. 1921. Synonymie de quelques Chrysomelidae (Col.). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 1921:61-62. Acloque, A. 1896. Faune de France, contenant la description de toutes les espèces indigenes disposes en tableaux analytiques. Coléoptères. J-B. Baillière et fils; Paris. 466 pp. Adams, R. H.
    [Show full text]