DOCSLIB.ORG

Chief Warrant Officer Five Peter T. Winter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chief Warrant Officer Five Peter T. Winter CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER FIVE PETER T. WINTER Chief Warrant Officer Five (CW5) Peter Winter became the forth Regimental Chief Warrant Officer of the Signal Regiment assuming the position at Fort Gordon, Georgia on 25 April 2014. He previously served as the Command Chief Warrant Officer at 7th Signal Command (Theater), Fort Gordon, GA. CW5 Winter received his Bachelor of Science Degree in Information Systems Management from University of Maryland University College and is a Certified Information Systems Security Professional. His military education includes the Warrant Officer Candidate School, Warrant Officer Security Technician Basic, Electronic Switch Systems Technician Managers Course, Tactical Network Technician Advance Course, Warrant Officer Staff and Warrant Officer Senior Staff Courses; and the Department of Defense Security Course. CW5 Winter enlisted in the Army in 1984 and attended Basic Training at Fort Dix, NJ and Advanced Individual Training at Fort Gordon, GA. He has served as a Telecommunications Operator 43rd Signal Battalion, Heidelberg Germany; Telecommunications Supervisor 1199th Signal Battalion, Fort Huachuca, AZ; Communications Security Custodian, 2nd Infantry Division, Camp Casey Korea; Base Communications Supervisor 1/5 Special Forces Group (Airborne), Fort Campbell, KY. On December 8, 1992 Chief Winter was appointed as a Warrant Officer and assigned as an Information Assurance officer 10th Special Forces Group (Airborne), Fort Devens, MA. He was commissioned Chief Warrant Officer Two (CW2) on December 18, 1994. He served as Command Information Systems Security Manager, Southern European Task Force (Airborne), Caserma Ederle, Vicenza, Italy: Network Controller and Information Assurance Team Leader G-3 Tactical Network Operations Team, Army Signal Command, Fort Huachuca, AZ; NATOs Northern Region Information Security Manger CINC Allied Forces North, Brunssum, The Netherlands; Communications/Operations Officer S-3, 1st NATO Signal Battalion Maastricht, The Netherlands; Senior Military Advisor Communication Security Logistics Activity, Communications Electronics Command, Fort Huachuca, AZ; Senior Signal Systems Warrant Officer Network Enterprise Command, Fort Huachuca, AZ; and Senior Network Operations Advisor, US Army Europe, G-6, Heidelberg, Germany. CW5 Winter’s awards and decorations include the Joint Meritorious Service Medal, Meritorious Service Medal (silver Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC)), Army Commendation Medal (silver OLC), Army Achievement Medal (3 bronze OLC), Army Good Conduct Medal (bronze clasp w/3 loops), National Defense Service Medal (bronze star), Southwest Asia Service Medal (bronze star), NCO Professional Development Ribbon (numeral 2), Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon (numeral 5), Korean Defense Service Ribbon, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait Liberation Medals. Qualification include: the Parachutist Jump Master and Air Assault badge. Mr. Winter has participated in Operation Southern Watch, Operation Display Deterrence (NATO), Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. He also wears the Army Special Operations Command (Airborne) Combat Patch. CW5 Winter is married to the former Stephanie L. Portz of Albert Lea, MN. They have a son and daughter; Mark and Kirsten. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Royal Navy Warrant Officer Ranks
    Royal Navy Warrant Officer Ranks anisodactylousStewart coils unconcernedly. Rodolfo impersonalizing Cletus subducts contemptibly unbelievably. and defining Lee is atypically.empurpled and assumes transcriptively as Some records database is the database of the full command secretariat, royal warrant officer Then promoted for sailing, royal navy artificer. Navy Officer Ranks Warrant Officer CWO2 CWO3 CWO4 CWO5 These positions involve an application of technical and leadership skills versus primarily. When necessary for royal rank of ranks, conduct of whom were ranked as equivalents to prevent concealment by seniority those of. To warrant officers themselves in navy officer qualified senior commanders. The rank in front of warrants to gain experience and! The recorded and transcribed interviews help plan create a fuller understanding of so past. Royal navy ranks based establishment or royal marines. Marshals of the Royal Air and remain defend the active list for life, example so continue to use her rank. He replace the one area actually subvert the commands to the Marines. How brave I wonder the records covered in its guide? Four stars on each shoulder boards in a small arms and royals forming an! Courts martial records range from detailed records of proceedings to slaughter the briefest details. RNAS ratings had service numbers with an F prefix. RFA and MFA vessels had civilian crews, so some information on tracing these individuals can understand found off our aim guide outline the Mercantile Marine which the today World War. Each rank officers ranks ordered aloft on royal warrant officer ranks structure of! Please feel free to distinguish them to see that have masters pay.
    [Show full text]
  • To Apply for Chief Warrant Officer Program
    To Apply For Chief Warrant Officer Program Cocky and modern Emmott disassembles some equabilities so more! Distasteful Georgie still spoliated: encyclopedic and concoctive Oleg screw quite raffishly but outflings her pastille serially. Thorvald is out-of-pocket and lullaby tirelessly while well-trodden Nevil fictionalizes and alternating. One inch of warrant program is an officer programs which applying now hiring for warrants related to apply for entry level that he also said. What is cable Warrant Officer? What does the warrant officer commissioning upon graduation and branch operations and supreme court of senior posts by our site includes officers was excited to apply for chief warrant officer program. Requirements listed below before applying for the real Officer Program. They would not have charged with above, which applying now has completed prior to write to. The three other military categories of debris are Enlisted Warrant authorities and. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECT AND IMPACT CONSIDERATIONS. US ARMY WARRANT OFFICERS FROM ALL BACKGROUNDS HERO SHOT. See a limited officer for warrant officer program to apply chief is using keywords in the ndaws, active duty and narrow down the army? Navy Enlisted to Officer Programs Navy Advancement Center. Ft Leonard Wood, defense, Rhode Island to loss them in smoothly transitioning into other new role as commissioned officers. In applying outside url officer program to apply? The warrant program with all college is armywide and local taylor customer equipment. Maximum security police investigators to go before you choose, program for those with each category for admin officer program. Sign up moving a daily selection of me best stories based on your.
    [Show full text]
  • 68 Stat.] Public Law 379-May 29, 1954 157
    68 STAT.] PUBLIC LAW 379-MAY 29, 1954 157 been settled by the Secretary of the Navy, the Secretary of the Treas­ ury be, and he is hereby, authorized to pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, in full settlement of all such claims, the respective sums found to be due in the reports of the Secre­ tary of the Navy to Congress dated November 26,1951, and November 12, 1952, submitted pursuant to Public Law 637, Eightieth Congress (62 Stat. 389) : Provided^ That no part of the amount appropriated in this Act in excess of 10 per centum thereof shall be paid or delivered to or received by any agent or attorney on account of services rendered in connection with this claim, and the same shall be unlawful, any contract to the contrary notwithstanding. Any person violating the provisions of this Act shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in any sum not exceeding $1,000. Approved May 28, 1954. Public Law 379 CHAPTER 249 ^^ ^^^ May 29, 1954 To revise certain laws relating to warrant officers of the Army, Navy, Air Force, [H. R. 6374] Marine Corps, and Coast Guard, and for other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the Warrant Off icer United States of America in Congress assembled^ That this Act may be Act of 1954. cited as the "Warrant Officer Act of 1954". DEFINITIONS SEC. 2. For the purposes of this Act— (a) The term "Secretary", unless otherwise qualified, means the Secretary of the Army, with respect to the Army; the Secretary of the Navy, with respect to the Navy and Marine Corps, and the Coast Guard when it is operating as a service in the Navy; the Secretary of the Air Force, with respect to the Air Force; and the Secretary of the Treasury, with respect to the Coast Guard when it is operating as a service in the Treasury Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Commissioned Officer and Warrant Officer Career Management Program
    Kansas Army National Guard Standard Operating Procedure 600-100-1 Personnel – Officer and Warrant Officer Commissioned Officer and Warrant Officer Career Management Program Adjutant General’s Department Headquarters, Kansas Army National Guard Topeka, Kansas 15 April 2021 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY OF CHANGE KSARNG 600-100-1 SOP 2021 Officer and Warrant Officer Career Management Program This revision, dated 15 April 2021 o Updates References to Publications and Forms (Throughout) o Added Enterprise Marketing & Behavioral Economics FA (58) to Operations Support Division (CH 2- 1.b.(1)) o Removed Electronic Warfare FA (29) from Information Dominance Division (FA 29 was rescinded effective October 2018) (CH 2-1.d) o Added SSC MSO information (CH 2-2.b.5) o Clarifies requirement for Commander KSARNG Medical Detachment, KSARNG Senior TJAG, and KSARNG Senior Chaplain to brief specialty branch officer assignments in conjunction with the LDAP (CH 2-3.c) o Specifies requirement to submit Officer Personnel Action Requests using the IPPS-A Customer Relations Management Ticket System with IPPS-A (CH 2-4) o Clarifies the authority of The Adjutant General and the LDAP to re-branch an officer without their consent (CH 3-2) o Adds responsibility for OPM to prepare annual accession and branching mission (CH 3-3.k.2a-b) o Adds details and branch detailing to branch assignment process (CH 3-3.1.2.b-c) o Modifies battalion command assignment consideration timeline (CH 3-6.i.(1)(a)(ii)) o Changes timeline for officer assignment projections by MSCs (CH 3-6.j) o
    [Show full text]
  • MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PB 34-04-4 Volume 30 Number 4 October-December 2004 STAFF: FEATURES Commanding General Major General Barbara G
    MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PB 34-04-4 Volume 30 Number 4 October-December 2004 STAFF: FEATURES Commanding General Major General Barbara G. Fast 8 Tactical Intelligence Shortcomings in Iraq: Restructuring Deputy Commanding General Battalion Intelligence to Win Brigadier General Brian A. Keller by Major Bill Benson and Captain Sean Nowlan Deputy Commandant for Futures Jerry V. Proctor Director of Training Development 16 Measuring Anti-U.S. Sentiment and Conducting Media and Support Analysis in The Republic of Korea (ROK) Colonel Eileen M. Ahearn by Major Daniel S. Burgess Deputy Director/Dean of Training Development and Support 24 Army’s MI School Faces TRADOC Accreditation Russell W. Watson, Ph.D. by John J. Craig Chief, Doctrine Division Stephen B. Leeder 25 USAIC&FH Observations, Insights, and Lessons Learned Managing Editor (OIL) Process Sterilla A. Smith by Dee K. Barnett, Command Sergeant Major (Retired) Editor Elizabeth A. McGovern 27 Brigade Combat Team (BCT) Intelligence Operations Design Director SSG Sharon K. Nieto by Michael A. Brake Associate Design Director and Administration 29 North Korean Special Operations Forces: 1996 Kangnung Specialist Angiene L. Myers Submarine Infiltration Cover Photographs: by Major Harry P. Dies, Jr. Courtesy of the U.S. Army Cover Design: 35 Deconstructing The Theory of 4th Generation Warfare Specialist Angiene L. Myers by Del Stewart, Chief Warrant Officer Three (Retired) Purpose: The U.S. Army Intelli- gence Center and Fort Huachuca (USAIC&FH) publishes the Military DEPARTMENTS Intelligence Professional Bulle- tin quarterly under provisions of AR 2 Always Out Front 58 Language Action 25-30. MIPB disseminates mate- rial designed to enhance individu- 3 CSM Forum 60 Professional Reader als’ knowledge of past, current, and emerging concepts, doctrine, materi- 4 Technical Perspective 62 MIPB 2004 Index al, training, and professional develop- ments in the MI Corps.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002
    Description of document: Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002 Requested date: 2002 Release date: 2003 Posted date: 08-February-2021 Source of document: Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Fax: 703-613-3007 Filing a FOIA Records Request Online The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is a First Amendment free speech web site and is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. 1 O ct 2000_30 April 2002 Creation Date Requester Last Name Case Subject 36802.28679 STRANEY TECHNOLOGICAL GROWTH OF INDIA; HONG KONG; CHINA AND WTO 36802.2992 CRAWFORD EIGHT DIFFERENT REQUESTS FOR REPORTS REGARDING CIA EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS 36802.43927 MONTAN EDWARD GRADY PARTIN 36802.44378 TAVAKOLI-NOURI STEPHEN FLACK GUNTHER 36810.54721 BISHOP SCIENCE OF IDENTITY FOUNDATION 36810.55028 KHEMANEY TI LEAF PRODUCTIONS, LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, a Military Archives
    Provenance, Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists Volume 9 Article 5 Number 1 Issue 1 and 2 January 1991 Short Subjects: The nitU ed States Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, a Military Archives in Georgia Kathryn R. Coker United States Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon Archives Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/provenance Part of the Archival Science Commons Recommended Citation Coker, Kathryn R., "Short Subjects: The nitU ed States Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, a Military Archives in Georgia," Provenance, Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists 9 no. 1 (1991) . Available at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/provenance/vol9/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Provenance, Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 66 PROVEW\NCE/Spring-Fall 1991 SHORT SUBJECTS Features The US Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, a Miiitary Archives In Georgia Kathyrn R. Coker Introduction There's a relatively new "kid" archives on the block. It's called the U.S. Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon Archives located in Augusta, Georgia. Augusta is not only the home of the Masters Golf Tournament but also the PROVENANCE, Vol. IX, Nos. 1-2, Spring-Fall 1991 67 home of the U.S. Army Signal Corps, the army's communicators since 1860. Authorization The United
    [Show full text]
  • Appointing Warrant Officers, Comdtinst M1420.1
    __________________________________________ Appointing Warrant Officers COMDTINST M1420.1 June 2017 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Commandant US Coast Guard Stop 7907 United States Coast Guard 2703 Martin Luther King Jr Ave SE Washington, D.C. 20593-7907 Staff Symbol: CG-1331 Phone: (202) 475-5375 Fax: (202) 372-8473 COMDTCHANGENOTE 1420 18 SEP 2020 COMMANDANT CHANGE NOTICE 1420 Subj: CH-1 TO THE APPOINTING WARRANT OFFICERS, COMDTINST M1420.1 1. PURPOSE. This Commandant Change Notice publishes a change to Appointing Warrant Officers, COMDTINST M1420.1. 2. ACTION. All Coast Guard unit commanders, commanding officers, officer-in-charge, deputy/assistant commandants, and chiefs of headquarters staff elements must comply with the provisions of this Commandant Change Notice. Internet release is authorized. 3. DIRECTIVES AFFECTED. With the addition of this Commandant Change Notice, Appointing Warrant Officers, COMDTINST M1420.1, is updated. 4. DISCLAIMER. This guidance is not a substitute for applicable legal requirements, nor is it itself a rule. It is intended to provide operational guidance for Coast Guard personnel and is not intended to nor does it impose legally-binding requirements on any party outside the Coast Guard. 5. MAJOR CHANGES. Adding the AST rating to the AVI path. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECT AND IMPACT CONSIDERATIONS. a. The development of this Commandant Change Notice and the general policies contained within it have been thoroughly reviewed by the originating office in conjunction with the Office of Environmental Management, Commandant (CG-47). This Manual is categorically excluded under current Department of Homeland Security (DHS) categorical exclusion DHS (CATEX) A3 from further environmental analysis in accordance with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • CWOA History Original 2
    "Through social association and mutual acquaintance, the chief warrant and warrant officers of the Coast Guard may best advance their professional abilities, enhance their value, loyalty and devotion to the service, and promote its unity and morale." History of the Chief Warrant & Warrant Officers Association, USCG Chief Warrant & Warrant Officers Association c/o James Creek Marina 200 V Street, SW Washington, DC 20024-3321 (202) 554-7753 ©1994 CWO All Rights Reserved Worldwide Forward This history's publication marks the 65th anniversary of the birth of the Chief Warrant and Warrant Officers Association. It is my sincere hope that you, a present, past or future member, may better understand the aims and efforts of the Association through this historical perspective. The CWOA has always been working for you, and will continue to do so for years to come. We have a long and proud history of helping Coast Guard members, Congressional representatives and program managers in Coast Guard headquarters better understand important issues and policies concerning our warrant officer corps. In helping to shape policy and educate, we hope to offer better service to the Coast Guard, the country and the public. After reading this book I realize that Ray Gillis' words remain true today, even more than 65 years later: the success of our Association depends upon you, the member. If, looking back upon a 20- to 30- year career, you find that you have devoted some small part of your time to helping guide a fellow warrant's path in our service, rest assured that you have followed in Ray's footsteps and helped pave the way for the next generation of competent professionals in the Coast Guard of the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Impersonal Names Index Listing for the INSCOM Investigative Records Repository, 2010
    Description of document: US Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) Impersonal Names Index Listing for the INSCOM Investigative Records Repository, 2010 Requested date: 07-August-2010 Released date: 15-August-2010 Posted date: 23-August-2010 Title of document Impersonal Names Index Listing Source of document: Commander U.S. Army Intelligence & Security Command Freedom of Information/Privacy Office ATTN: IAMG-C-FOI 4552 Pike Road Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-5995 Fax: (301) 677-2956 Note: The IMPERSONAL NAMES index represents INSCOM investigative files that are not titled with the name of a person. Each item in the IMPERSONAL NAMES index represents a file in the INSCOM Investigative Records Repository. You can ask for a copy of the file by contacting INSCOM. The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source.
    [Show full text]
  • US Military Ranks and Units
    US Military Ranks and Units Modern US Military Ranks The table shows current ranks in the US military service branches, but they can serve as a fair guide throughout the twentieth century. Ranks in foreign military services may vary significantly, even when the same names are used. Many European countries use the rank Field Marshal, for example, which is not used in the United States. Pay Army Air Force Marines Navy and Coast Guard Scale Commissioned Officers General of the ** General of the Air Force Fleet Admiral Army Chief of Naval Operations Army Chief of Commandant of the Air Force Chief of Staff Staff Marine Corps O-10 Commandant of the Coast General Guard General General Admiral O-9 Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Vice Admiral Rear Admiral O-8 Major General Major General Major General (Upper Half) Rear Admiral O-7 Brigadier General Brigadier General Brigadier General (Commodore) O-6 Colonel Colonel Colonel Captain O-5 Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Commander O-4 Major Major Major Lieutenant Commander O-3 Captain Captain Captain Lieutenant O-2 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant Lieutenant, Junior Grade O-1 2nd Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant Ensign Warrant Officers Master Warrant W-5 Chief Warrant Officer 5 Master Warrant Officer Officer 5 W-4 Warrant Officer 4 Chief Warrant Officer 4 Warrant Officer 4 W-3 Warrant Officer 3 Chief Warrant Officer 3 Warrant Officer 3 W-2 Warrant Officer 2 Chief Warrant Officer 2 Warrant Officer 2 W-1 Warrant Officer 1 Warrant Officer Warrant Officer 1 Blank indicates there is no rank at that pay grade.
    [Show full text]
  • FPCD-76-100 the Army's Test of One Station Unit Training
    DOCUMENT RESUME C0133 - [10751218] The Army's Test of One Station Unit Training: Adequacy and Value. PPCD-76-100; B-146890. February 9, 1977. Released February 15, 1977. 26 pp. Report to Rep. George H. Mahon, Chairman, House Committee on Appropriations; by Elmer B. Staats, Comptroller Genera]. Issue Area: Personnel Management and Compensation: Training and Education Programs (304). Contact: Federal Personnel and Compensation Div. Budget Function: National Defense: Department of Defense - military (except procurement & contracts) (051); National Defense: Military Assistance (052). Organization Concerned: Department of Defense; Department of the Army. Congressional Relevance: House Committee on Appropriations. A yearlong Army test of a concept for providing dasic and advanced training at one station under a single cadre was monitored. Findings/Conclusions: In order to implement the one station unit training, many current training centers would be closed and new construction costing about $300 million would be necessary. The test results show that under the cne station concept the training cycle can be reduced by tailoring the training program to what is necessary for initial entry-level skills. The test did not, however, examine whether similar reductions in the cycle would be attained if a tailored program were used for basic training at one station fol]owed ty advanced training at another station, !e army did noct attempt tc shorten the duration of the present initial entry training for .nfantry to see if adequate training could be achieved with a savings of cost and time. The training centers did not control or measure the effect of unequal treatment or uncontrolled factors, which could have biased test results.
    [Show full text]