DOCSLIB.ORG

A Conversation with Paul Greengard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A conversation with Paul Greengard Ushma S. Neill J Clin Invest. 2013;123(3):937-938. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI68877. Conversations with Giants in Medicine If you, or someone you know, has Parkinson’s disease, mental health issues, or other neurological disorders, medication can often help. The bulk of these medications have been established based on the work of neuroscientist Paul Greengard (Figure 1) from the Rockefeller University, who worked out just how the brain responds to neurotransmitters — the chemicals that help the brain signal. The bulk of what most neuroscientists know today about neurotransmission, and specifically the dynamics of slow synaptic transmission, is predicated on the work of Paul Greengard. The full interview, with many more stories about his seminal research discoveries and his competitive streak in potato sack races, can be seen on the JCI website, http://www.jci.org/kiosk/cgm. JCI: Can you tell us a little bit about your path towards becoming a scientist? Greengard: I grew up in New York City. My mother died giving birth to me, and then my father remarried when I was one year old. He was a businessman; she was a housewife. They were both very anti-intellectual, and so I did not get the bug for doing scientific research at home. It was a very anti-intellectual atmosphere at home and to a certain extent, possibly a rebellion against that, was what made me very committed to science. They did not want me to go to college, but fortunately I […] Find the latest version: https://jci.me/68877/pdf Conversations with giants in medicine A conversation with Paul Greengard If you, or someone you know, has Parkin- to start a new department of biophysics. He ceutical company. I was very young, and son’s disease, mental health issues, or other took a few of us with him, and I ended up they offered me this very senior position. neurological disorders, medication can often doing a PhD degree there at Hopkins. Kef- I thought it might be exciting to take my help. The bulk of these medications have been fer Hartline was the first scientist I worked knowledge of basic science and apply it to established based on the work of neuroscien- with. He was a vision person who went on new drug discovery. And so, I worked for tist Paul Greengard (Figure 1) from the Rock- to win a Nobel Prize. At the time, everybody nine years in a pharmaceutical company efeller University, who worked out just how in the department was studying the electri- which was called Geigy at the time, then the brain responds to neurotransmitters — cal properties of nerve cells. Alan Hodgkin merged with Ciba and became Ciba-Geigy, the chemicals that help the brain signal. The came and gave a beautiful lecture about and then merged with Sandoz to become bulk of what most neuroscientists know understanding the ionic basis of the nerve what’s today known as Novartis. today about neurotransmission, and specifi- impulse, and I thought it might be a long JCI: How did that time at Geigy shape the cally the dynamics of slow synaptic transmis- time between that discovery and the next way that you did your research or how you sion, is predicated on the work of Paul Green- major advance in biophysics of the nervous thought about targets? gard. The full interview, with many more system. So, I decided it would be interesting Greengard: I think it did a couple of things stories about his seminal research discover- to understand more about the underlying for me. It gave me an education of the sort ies and his competitive streak in potato sack molecular properties of nerve cells. one might have gotten in medical school. At races, can be seen on the JCI website, http:// JCI: In the autobiography that accom- the time, when I was ready to do advanced www.jci.org/kiosk/cgm. panied your Nobel lecture, you remarked studies, I decided not to go to medical school JCI: Can you tell us a little bit about your that the lecture by Alan Hodgkin was one because it was very much a hands-on profes- path towards becoming a scientist? of your first Aha moments that helped you sion where the physicians really couldn’t do Greengard: I grew up in New York City. My to shape the direction of your career. very much for their patients. There were bril- mother died giving birth to me, and then my Greengard: Yes, that’s true. He was a mar- liant clinicians, but there was a very limited father remarried when I was one year old. He velous lecturer and a marvelous human repertoire of tools they had. Instead, I decided was a businessman; she was a housewife. They being, and it was very inspiring, but it to do a PhD. But, I got a kind of education were both very anti-intellectual, and so I did inspired me in sort of a negative way. I said, while I was in the pharmaceutical industry not get the bug for doing scientific research “I don’t want to be in this research area any- similar to that which I would have gotten at home. It was a very anti-intellectual atmo- more.” Hodgkin had solved the biophysical in medical school, as I learned much more sphere at home and to a certain extent, pos- problems that were solvable at that time. about the biology of the body, particularly of sibly a rebellion against that, was what made So, I turned to studying the biochemistry the brain, and what the major issues were, and me very committed to science. They did not of nerve cells and their function. began to think about ways of studying them. want me to go to college, but fortunately JCI: After you finished your PhD at At the end of that nine-year period, I I had served in the Second World War, and Hopkins, you then spent several years abroad did one semester as a Visiting Professor at was able to get through college on the GI Bill. in England and in Holland. How did that Vanderbilt University with a brilliant scien- JCI: What did you study? time shape your path and your discoveries? tist named Earl Sutherland who discovered Greengard: In college I studied mathemat- Greengard: I spent a lot of time thinking cyclic AMP. That was an excellent experience. ics and physics. After that, I was going to go about how the rapidly increasing knowl- At the time I was a graduate student at Johns to graduate school, and I had been planning edge of biochemistry could be applied to Hopkins, Sutherland was publishing some to work in theoretical physics. But this was an understanding of nerve cell function. It amazing papers on how hormones were pro- almost immediately after the dropping of was a difficult period in the sense that bio- ducing their effects and showing that they the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Naga- chemists were only interested in the brain as acted through cyclic AMP. In another line of saki, and I felt that was not an area I wanted a source of enzymes. There are thousands of study, Edwin Krebs and his colleagues had to be really involved in because I thought enzymes that are much more active in the been studying protein phosphorylation and there were better ways of spending my life brain than any place else. The neurophysi- discovered cyclic AMP regulation of protein than trying to destroy mankind. I had heard ologists were not really interested in the phosphorylation. After nine years of devel- about the nascent field of medical physics or underlying molecular mechanisms. oping CNS drugs, I returned to my interest biophysics. And at that time, there were two I went to a pharmacology department in the biochemical basis of nerve cell func- biophysics departments in the country. One for three of the five years that I was doing tion and leaned very heavily on the discover- was at the Lawrence Laboratory in Berkeley, my postdoctoral studies because they had ies of the Sutherland lab and the Krebs lab which was involved in doing radioisotope both biochemical and electrophysiological to try to determine what was going on in the studies in biology and the other one was the equipment that one could use. While I was brain. One key to progress was my consider- Department of Biophysics at Penn which there in the laboratory of a very distin- ing the possibility that what Sutherland had was involved in studying the electrical prop- guished scientist named Wilhelm Feldberg, been studying, namely how hormones work erties of nerve cells. I was able to gain a lot more experience in in the endocrine system, might be applicable I started at Penn but then the chairman both biochemistry and electrophysiology. to nerve cells — that a neurotransmitter of the department, Detlev Bronk, moved to While in the Feldberg laboratory, I was released from a presynaptic terminal and Johns Hopkins to become the president and approached about a position in a pharma- activating post-synaptic receptors might The Journal of Clinical Investigation http://www.jci.org Volume 123 Number 3 March 2013 937 conversations with giants in medicine my daughter saying, “But he’s sound asleep. You really want me to wake him up?” And then the reply, “Well, my name is Hans Jörn- vall and I am the Secretary of the Nobel Prize Committee.” I said, “It’s okay. I’m awake.” So, that was how I first learned about it.
Recommended publications
  • The Creation of Neuroscience

    The Creation of Neuroscience

    The Creation of Neuroscience The Society for Neuroscience and the Quest for Disciplinary Unity 1969-1995 Introduction rom the molecular biology of a single neuron to the breathtakingly complex circuitry of the entire human nervous system, our understanding of the brain and how it works has undergone radical F changes over the past century. These advances have brought us tantalizingly closer to genu- inely mechanistic and scientifically rigorous explanations of how the brain’s roughly 100 billion neurons, interacting through trillions of synaptic connections, function both as single units and as larger ensem- bles. The professional field of neuroscience, in keeping pace with these important scientific develop- ments, has dramatically reshaped the organization of biological sciences across the globe over the last 50 years. Much like physics during its dominant era in the 1950s and 1960s, neuroscience has become the leading scientific discipline with regard to funding, numbers of scientists, and numbers of trainees. Furthermore, neuroscience as fact, explanation, and myth has just as dramatically redrawn our cultural landscape and redefined how Western popular culture understands who we are as individuals. In the 1950s, especially in the United States, Freud and his successors stood at the center of all cultural expla- nations for psychological suffering. In the new millennium, we perceive such suffering as erupting no longer from a repressed unconscious but, instead, from a pathophysiology rooted in and caused by brain abnormalities and dysfunctions. Indeed, the normal as well as the pathological have become thoroughly neurobiological in the last several decades. In the process, entirely new vistas have opened up in fields ranging from neuroeconomics and neurophilosophy to consumer products, as exemplified by an entire line of soft drinks advertised as offering “neuro” benefits.
  • Richard Llewelyn-Davies and the Architect's Dilemma."

    Richard Llewelyn-Davies and the Architect's Dilemma."

    The Richard Llewciy11-Davies Memorial Lectures in ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIETY March 3, 1985-at the Institute for Advanced Study The J/ictoria11 City: Images and Realities Asa Briggs Provost of Worcester College University of Oxford November 17, 1986--at the University of London The Nuffield Planning Inquiry Brian Flo\vers Vice-Chancellor University of London October 27, 1987-at the Institute for Advanced Study Richard Llewcly11-Davics and the Architect's Dilemma N ocl Annan Vice-Chancellor Erncritus University of London PREFACE The Richard Llewelyn-Davies Memorial Lectures in "Environ­ ment and Society" were established to honor the memory of an architect distinguished in the fields of contemporary architectural, urban and environmental planning. Born in Wales in 1912, Richard Llewelyn-Davies was educated at Trinity College, Cambridge, !'Ecole des Beaux Arts in Paris and the Architectural Association in London. In 1960 he began a fif­ teen-year association with University College of the University of London as Professor of Architecture, Professor of Town Planning, Head of the Bartlett School of Architecture and Dean of the School of Environmental Studies. He became, in 1967, the initial chair­ man of Britain's Centre for Environmental Studies, one of the world's leading research organizations on urbanism, and held that post for the rest of his life. He combined his academic career with professional practice in England, the Middle East, Africa, Paki­ stan, North and South America. In the fall of 1980, the year before he died, Richard Llewelyn­ Davies came to the Institute for Advanced Study. He influenced us in many ways, from a reorientation of the seating arrangement in the seminar room improving discussion and exchange, to the per­ manent implantation of an environmental sensibility.
  • Cambridge's 92 Nobel Prize Winners Part 2 - 1951 to 1974: from Crick and Watson to Dorothy Hodgkin

    Cambridge's 92 Nobel Prize Winners Part 2 - 1951 to 1974: from Crick and Watson to Dorothy Hodgkin

    Cambridge's 92 Nobel Prize winners part 2 - 1951 to 1974: from Crick and Watson to Dorothy Hodgkin By Cambridge News | Posted: January 18, 2016 By Adam Care The News has been rounding up all of Cambridge's 92 Nobel Laureates, celebrating over 100 years of scientific and social innovation. ADVERTISING In this installment we move from 1951 to 1974, a period which saw a host of dramatic breakthroughs, in biology, atomic science, the discovery of pulsars and theories of global trade. It's also a period which saw The Eagle pub come to national prominence and the appearance of the first female name in Cambridge University's long Nobel history. The Gender Pay Gap Sale! Shop Online to get 13.9% off From 8 - 11 March, get 13.9% off 1,000s of items, it highlights the pay gap between men & women in the UK. Shop the Gender Pay Gap Sale – now. Promoted by Oxfam 1. 1951 Ernest Walton, Trinity College: Nobel Prize in Physics, for using accelerated particles to study atomic nuclei 2. 1951 John Cockcroft, St John's / Churchill Colleges: Nobel Prize in Physics, for using accelerated particles to study atomic nuclei Walton and Cockcroft shared the 1951 physics prize after they famously 'split the atom' in Cambridge 1932, ushering in the nuclear age with their particle accelerator, the Cockcroft-Walton generator. In later years Walton returned to his native Ireland, as a fellow of Trinity College Dublin, while in 1951 Cockcroft became the first master of Churchill College, where he died 16 years later. 3. 1952 Archer Martin, Peterhouse: Nobel Prize in Chemistry, for developing partition chromatography 4.
  • Lecture Program

    Lecture Program

    EARL W. SUTHERLAND LECTURE EARL W. SUTHERLAND LECTURE The Earl W. Sutherland Lecture Series was established by the SPONSORED BY: Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics in 1997 DEPARTMENT OF MOLECULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICS to honor Dr. Sutherland, a former member of this department and winner of the 1971 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. This series highlights important advances in cell signaling. ROBERT J. LEFKOWITZ, MD NOBEL PRIZE IN CHEMISTRY, 2012 SPEAKERS IN THIS SERIES HAVE INCLUDED: SEVEN TRANSMEMBRANE RECEPTORS Edmond H. Fischer (1997) Alfred G. Gilman (1999) Ferid Murad (2001) Louis J. Ignarro (2003) MARCH 31, 2016 Paul Greengard (2007) 4:00 P.M. 208 LIGHT HALL Eric Kandel (2009) Roger Tsien (2011) Michael S. Brown (2013) 867-2923-Institution-Discovery Lecture Series-Lefkowitz-BK-CH.indd 1 3/11/16 9:39 AM EARL W. SUTHERLAND, 1915-1974 ROBERT J. LEFKOWITZ, MD JAMES B. DUKE PROFESSOR, Earl W. Sutherland grew up in Burlingame, Kansas, a small farming community DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER that nourished his love for the outdoors and fishing, which he retained throughout INVESTIGATOR, HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE his life. He graduated from Washburn College in 1937 and then received his MEMBER, NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES M.D. from Washington University School of Medicine in 1942. After serving as a MEMBER, INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE medical officer during World War II, he returned to Washington University to train NOBEL PRIZE IN CHEMISTRY, 2012 with Carl and Gerty Cori. During those years he was influenced by his interactions with such eminent scientists as Louis Leloir, Herman Kalckar, Severo Ochoa, Arthur Kornberg, Christian deDuve, Sidney Colowick, Edwin Krebs, Theodore Robert J.
  • The Birth of Information in the Brain: Edgar Adrian and the Vacuum Tube,” Science in Context 28: 31-52

    The Birth of Information in the Brain: Edgar Adrian and the Vacuum Tube,” Science in Context 28: 31-52

    Garson, J. (2015) “The Birth of Information in the Brain: Edgar Adrian and the Vacuum Tube,” Science in Context 28: 31-52. Preprint (not copyedited or formatted) Please use DOI when citing or quoting: https://doi- org.proxy.wexler.hunter.cuny.edu/10.1017/S0269889714000313 The Birth of Information in the Brain: Edgar Adrian and the Vacuum Tube Word Count: 10, 418 Abstract: As historian Henning Schmidgen notes, the scientific study of the nervous system would have been ‘unthinkable’ without the industrialization of communication in the 1830s. Historians have investigated extensively the way nerve physiologists have borrowed concepts and tools from the field of communications, particularly regarding the nineteenth-century work of figures like Helmholtz and in the American Cold War Era. The following focuses specifically on the interwar research of the Cambridge physiologist Edgar Douglas Adrian, and on the technology that led to his Nobel-Prize- winning research, the thermionic vacuum tube. Many countries used the vacuum tube during the war for the purpose of amplifying and intercepting coded messages. These events provided a context for Adrian’s evolving understanding of the nerve fiber in the 1920s. In particular, they provide the background for Adrian’s transition around 1926 to describing the nerve impulse in terms of “information,” “messages,” “signals,” or even “codes,” and for translating the basic principles of the nerve, such as the all-or-none principle and adaptation, into such an “informational” context. The following also places Adrian’s research in the broader context of the changing relationship between science and technology, and between physics and physiology, in the first few decades of the twentieth century.
  • TRINITY COLLEGE Cambridge Trinity College Cambridge College Trinity Annual Record Annual

    TRINITY COLLEGE Cambridge Trinity College Cambridge College Trinity Annual Record Annual

    2016 TRINITY COLLEGE cambridge trinity college cambridge annual record annual record 2016 Trinity College Cambridge Annual Record 2015–2016 Trinity College Cambridge CB2 1TQ Telephone: 01223 338400 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.trin.cam.ac.uk Contents 5 Editorial 11 Commemoration 12 Chapel Address 15 The Health of the College 18 The Master’s Response on Behalf of the College 25 Alumni Relations & Development 26 Alumni Relations and Associations 37 Dining Privileges 38 Annual Gatherings 39 Alumni Achievements CONTENTS 44 Donations to the College Library 47 College Activities 48 First & Third Trinity Boat Club 53 Field Clubs 71 Students’ Union and Societies 80 College Choir 83 Features 84 Hermes 86 Inside a Pirate’s Cookbook 93 “… Through a Glass Darkly…” 102 Robert Smith, John Harrison, and a College Clock 109 ‘We need to talk about Erskine’ 117 My time as advisor to the BBC’s War and Peace TRINITY ANNUAL RECORD 2016 | 3 123 Fellows, Staff, and Students 124 The Master and Fellows 139 Appointments and Distinctions 141 In Memoriam 155 A Ninetieth Birthday Speech 158 An Eightieth Birthday Speech 167 College Notes 181 The Register 182 In Memoriam 186 Addresses wanted CONTENTS TRINITY ANNUAL RECORD 2016 | 4 Editorial It is with some trepidation that I step into Boyd Hilton’s shoes and take on the editorship of this journal. He managed the transition to ‘glossy’ with flair and panache. As historian of the College and sometime holder of many of its working offices, he also brought a knowledge of its past and an understanding of its mysteries that I am unable to match.
  • Earl W. Sutherland Lecture Earl W

    Earl W. Sutherland Lecture Earl W

    EARL W. SUTHERLAND LECTURE EARL W. SUTHERLAND LECTURE The Earl W. Sutherland Lecture Series was established by the SPONSORED BY: Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics in 1997 DEPARTMENT OF MOLECULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICS to honor Dr. Sutherland, a former member of this department and winner of the 1971 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. This series highlights important advances in cell signaling. MICHAEL S. BROWN, M.D NOBEL LAUREATE IN PHYSIOLOGY OR MEDICINE 1985 SPEAKERS IN THIS SERIES HAVE INCLUDED: SCAP: ANATOMY OF A MEMBRANE STEROL SENSOR Edmond H. Fischer (1997) Alfred G. Gilman (1999) Ferid Murad (2001) Louis J. Ignarro (2003) APRIL 25, 2013 Paul Greengard (2007) 4:00 P.M. 208 LIGHT HALL Eric Kandel (2009) Roger Tsien (2011) FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT: Department of Molecular Physiology & Biophysics 738 Ann and Roscoe Robinson Medical Research Building Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville, TN 37232-0615 Tel 615.322.7001 [email protected] EARL W. SUTHERLAND, 1915-1974 MICHAEL S. BROWN, M.D. REGENTAL PROFESSOR Earl W. Sutherland grew up in Burlingame, Kansas, a small farming community that nourished his love for the outdoors and fishing, which he retained throughout DIRECTOR OF THE JONSSON CENTER FOR MOLECULAR GENETICS UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS his life. He graduated from Washburn College in 1937 and then received his M.D. SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER AT DALLAS from Washington University School of Medicine in 1942. After serving as a medi- NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSIOLOGY OR MEDICINE, 1985 cal officer during World War II, he returned to Washington University to train with MEMBER, NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Carl and Gerty Cori.
  • The Fessard's School of Neurophysiology After

    The Fessard's School of Neurophysiology After

    The fessard’s School of neurophysiology after the Second World War in france: globalisation and diversity in neurophysiological research (1938-1955) Jean-Gaël Barbara To cite this version: Jean-Gaël Barbara. The fessard’s School of neurophysiology after the Second World War in france: globalisation and diversity in neurophysiological research (1938-1955). Archives Italiennes de Biologie, Universita degli Studi di Pisa, 2011. halshs-03090650 HAL Id: halshs-03090650 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03090650 Submitted on 11 Jan 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Fessard’s School of neurophysiology after the Second World War in France: globalization and diversity in neurophysiological research (1938-1955) Jean- Gaël Barbara Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CNRS UMR 7102 Université Denis Diderot, Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CNRS UMR 7219 [email protected] Postal Address : JG Barbara, UPMC, case 14, 7 quai Saint Bernard, 75005,
  • A. Personal Statement I Have Been Studying the Regulation of Mast Cell Activation and Its Role in Neuroinflammatory Diseases for Over 30 Years

    A. Personal Statement I Have Been Studying the Regulation of Mast Cell Activation and Its Role in Neuroinflammatory Diseases for Over 30 Years

    OMB No. 0925-0001 and 0925-0002 (Rev. 10/15 Approved Through 10/31/2018) BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Provide the following information for the Senior/key personnel and other significant contributors. Follow this format for each person. DO NOT EXCEED FIVE PAGES. NAME POSITION TITLE THEOHARIDES, THEOHARIS C. Professor of Pharmacology and Internal Medicine (Allergy & Clinical Immunology) eRA COMMONS USR NAME (credential, e.g. agency login) THEOHAR EDUCATION/TRAINING (Begin with baccalaureate or other initial professional education, such as nursing, and include postdoctoral training.) INSTITUTION AND LOCATION DEGREE YEAR(s) FIELD OF STUDY (if applicable) Yale University, New Haven, CT B.A. 1972 Biology & Hist. Medicine Yale University, New Haven, CT M.S. 1975 Neuroimmunology Yale University, New Haven, CT M.Phil. 1975 Immunopharmacology Yale University, New Haven, CT Ph.D.* 1978 Pharmacology Yale University, New Haven, CT M.D. 1983 Medicine Tufts University, Fletcher School Law & Diplomacy Certificate 1999 Leadership& Management Harvard Univ, J.F. Kennedy School of Government M.P.A. Deferred Biomedical Res Policy *Doctoral Thesis advisors: W.W. Douglas, M.D.-Royal Acad. Sciences; Paul Greengard, Ph.D.-2000 Nobel Laureate in Physiol & Med; Doctoral Thesis examiner, George E. Palade, M.D.- 1974 Nobel Laureate in Physiology& Medicine A. Personal Statement I have been studying the regulation of mast cell activation and its role in neuroinflammatory diseases for over 30 years. I was the first to report that mast cells can: (a) secrete specific mediators
  • Nobel Laureates

    Nobel Laureates

    The Rockefeller University » Nobel Laureates Sunday, December 15, 2013 Calendar Directory Employment DONATE AWARDS & HONORS University Overview & Nobel Laureates Quick Facts History Since the institution's founding in 1901, 24 Nobel Prize winners have been associated with the university. Of these, two Faculty Awards are Rockefeller graduates (Edelman and Baltimore) and six laureates are current members of the Rockefeller faculty (Günter Blobel, Christian de Duve, Paul Greengard, Roderick MacKinnon, Paul Nurse and Torsten Wiesel). Nobel Prize Albert Lasker Awards Ralph M. Roderick Paul Nurse National Medal of Science Steinman MacKinnon 2001 Institute of Medicine 2011 2003 Physiology or National Academy of Physiology or Chemistry Medicine Sciences Medicine Gairdner Foundation International Award Campus Map & Views Travel Directions Paul Günter R. Bruce NYC Resources Greengard Blobel Merrifield Office of the President 2000 1999 1984 Physiology or Physiology or Chemistry Chief of Staff Medicine Medicine Board of Trustees and Corporate Officers Sustainability Torsten N. David Albert Contact Wiesel Baltimore Claude 1981 1975 1974 Physiology or Physiology or Physiology or Medicine Medicine Medicine Christian George E. Stanford de Duve Palade Moore 1974 1974 1972 Physiology or Physiology or Chemistry Medicine Medicine William H. Gerald M. H. Keffer Stein Edelman Hartline 1972 1972 1967 Chemistry Physiology or Physiology or Medicine Medicine Peyton Joshua Edward L. Rous Lederberg Tatum 1966 1958 1958 http://www.rockefeller.edu/about/awards/nobel/[2013/12/16 7:42:49] The Rockefeller University » Nobel Laureates Physiology or Physiology or Physiology or Medicine Medicine Medicine Fritz A. John H. Wendell Lipmann Northrop M. Stanley 1953 1946 1946 Physiology or Chemistry Chemistry Medicine Herbert S.
  • Physiological Society Template

    Physiological Society Template

    An interview with Ron Whittam Conducted by David Miller and Richard Naftalin on 12 August 2014 Published December 2019 This is the transcript of an interview of the Oral Histories Project for The Society's History & Archives Committee. The original digital sound recording is lodged with The Society and will be placed in its archive at The Wellcome Library. An interview with Ron Whittam Ron Whittam photographed by David Miller This interview with Ron Whittam (RW) was conducted by David Miller (DM) and Richard Naftalin (RN) on 12 August 2014 DM: Let’s make sure we’re starting. Fine. So okay this is David Miller, it’s the 12th August 2014 and we’re are in Leicester at the home of Professor Ron Whittam and we’re here to record for the oral history project of the Physiological Society. So, also here is Richard Naftalin whose voice you’ll hear and Ron Whittam himself, of course. So we’re going to run through elements of Ron’s life and background as he wishes to cover in the usual way. So that’s enough from me. Perhaps Richard if you could just say a few words so that it’s recognised whose voice is whose. RN: Okay, well I’m Richard Naftalin. I’m currently Emeritus Professor at King’s College London but I was, had the privilege of being, in Leicester University and I was appointed lecturer to Ron Whittam’s department of General Physiology in 1968. I came to Leicester as newlywed and as a virgin physiologist to Ron’s department so that was very exciting –at least for me.
  • Curt Von Euler 528

    Curt Von Euler 528

    EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Albert J. Aguayo Bernice Grafstein Theodore Melnechuk Dale Purves Gordon M. Shepherd Larry W. Swanson (Chairperson) The History of Neuroscience in Autobiography VOLUME 1 Edited by Larry R. Squire SOCIETY FOR NEUROSCIENCE 1996 Washington, D.C. Society for Neuroscience 1121 14th Street, NW., Suite 1010 Washington, D.C. 20005 © 1996 by the Society for Neuroscience. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 96-70950 ISBN 0-916110-51-6 Contents Denise Albe-Fessard 2 Julius Axelrod 50 Peter O. Bishop 80 Theodore H. Bullock 110 Irving T. Diamond 158 Robert Galambos 178 Viktor Hamburger 222 Sir Alan L. Hodgkin 252 David H. Hubel 294 Herbert H. Jasper 318 Sir Bernard Katz 348 Seymour S. Kety 382 Benjamin Libet 414 Louis Sokoloff 454 James M. Sprague 498 Curt von Euler 528 John Z. Young 554 Curt von Euler BORN: Stockholm County, Sweden October 22, 1918 EDUCATION: Karolinska Institute, B.M., 1940 Karolinska Institute, M.D., 1945 Karolinska Institute, Ph.D., 1947 APPOINTMENTS: Karolinska Institute (1948) Professor Emeritus, Karolinska Institute (1985) HONORS AND AWARDS (SELECTED): Norwegian Academy of Sciences (foreign member) Curt von Euler conducted pioneering work on the central control of motor systems, brain mechanisms of thermoregulation, and on neural systems that control respiration. Curt von Euler Background ow did I come to devote my life to neurophysiology rather than to a clinical discipline? Why, in the first place, did I choose to study H medicine rather than another branch of biology or other subjects within the natural sciences? And what guided me to make the turns on the road and follow what appeared to be bypaths? There are no simple answers to such questions, but certainly a number of accidental circum- stances have intervened in important ways.