A Comparative Analysis on Maritime Disaster Management Between Korea and Sweden

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Comparative Analysis on Maritime Disaster Management Between Korea and Sweden Journal of Scientific Research & Reports 25(2): 1-7, 2019; Article no.JSRR.52608 ISSN: 2320-0227 A Comparative Analysis on Maritime Disaster Management between Korea and Sweden Lock Namkung1* 1Department of Security Management, Kyonggi University, Suwon, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea. Author’s contribution The sole author designed, analysed, interpreted and prepared the manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/JSRR/2019/v25i230188 Editor(s): (1) Dr. Rahul Kumar Jaiswal, National Institute of Hydrology, WALMI Campus, Bhopal, India. (2) Prof. Dr. Ani Matei, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration Bucharest, Romania. Reviewers: (1) Danny Faturachman, Universitas Darma Persada, Indonesia. (2) Helder Cesar Tinoco, Federal Institute of Rio de Janeiro (Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro), Brazil. (3) Yung Yau, City University of Hong Kong, China. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sdiarticle4.com/review-history/52608 Received 20 August 2019 Original Research Article Accepted 24 October 2019 Published 25 October 2019 ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to illustrate the importance of crisis management planning and effective governance by comparing and analysing cases related to crisis management in disasters. Firstly, this study analyses the sinking of the MV Sewol of Korea, one of the worst ship accidents in the world, and criticise the crisis management plan. It also applies relevant methodologies to identify how to manage incidents and how to perform them for better management. Secondly, this analyses the sinking accident and crisis management plan of MS Estonia in Sweden which is one of the worst ship accident in the world. As a result, MS Estonia disaster triggered improvements in safety policies in Sweden. This study argues that Korean government can learn important lessons from Sweden to avoid the "vicious cycle" that exists in South Korea's policy decisions related to safety issues. Compared with the case in Sweden, this study suggests that further measures are needed to end the vicious circle of low safety standards and low confidence in Korea. Compared to the case in Sweden, a few policy recommendations are suggested in this study. Keywords: Disaster management; maritime disaster; vicious cycle; MV Sewol; Ms Estonia. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]; Namkung; JSRR, 25(2): 1-7, 2019; Article no.JSRR.52608 1. INTRODUCTION citizens in Korea visited approximately 2,204,224 people in the first 100 days after the sinking, and The purpose of this study is to illustrate the 67 memorials were established [2]. In addition, importance of crisis management planning and citizens expressed sympathy by wearing a yellow effective governance by comparing and ribbon. They demanded that the government analysing cases related to crisis management in enact new safety laws and thoroughly investigate disasters. Firstly, this study analyses the sinking the events and punish those directly contributing of the MV Sewol of Korea, one of the worst ship to the chain of events. In summary, the MV accidents in the world, and criticise the crisis Sewol sinking focuses on Korea's policy management plan. It also applies relevant decisions with defined by Birkland [3]. Relatively methodologies to identify how to manage uncommon; the potential to cause a potentially incidents and how to perform them for better larger future can be identified or defined as management. Secondly, this analyses the harmful. It is harmful to a specific geographic sinking accident and crisis management plan of area or community of interest. "It is known to MS Estonia in Sweden which is one of the worst policy makers and the public at the same time." ship accident in the world. As a result, MS Following a generally focused event is a series of Estonia disaster triggered improvements in new policy developments in the field. Therefore, safety policies in Sweden. the Korean government can adopt or develop new safety-related policies in response to the This study argues that Korean government can Sewol disaster [2,4]. learn important lessons from Sweden to avoid the "vicious cycle" that exists in South Korea's Cheonghae Shipping has continuously pursued policy decisions related to safety issues. Also it economic benefits. First, the company minimized provides two figures. First, it presents relevant security investments, accounting for only 0.001% data on the safety levels of Sweden and Korea of the 2013 safety training session gross revenue. (and some other OECD countries) and analyses Second, the company did not regard the crew as the fundamental structural reasons for the a top priority. Three of the five MV Sewol crew, relative success and failure of the two safety including the captain, were temporary workers. policies. Second, this study analyses the Their overall salary was 20-30% lower than other theoretical framework through the Sendai coastline shipping companies paid. This poor framework of the tragedies of MV Sewol and MS environment and lack of safety education clearly Estonia. affected the way the crew responded in the event of a disaster [5]. 2. THE SINKING OF MV SEWOL IN SOUTH KOREA Third, Cheonghae shipping did not comply with regulations to increase profits. Before the On April 16, 2014, the South Korean ship MV disaster, MV crew members forged the has sunk nearby the southwest of Jindo. This documents indicating the amount of cargo and tragedy took away 304 people's life and students the number of cargoes when reporting to the who made a school excursion to Jeju Island Korea Maritime Institute, which is responsible for occupied a significant portion of the victims so passenger and cargo safety. The reported numerous Korean people grieved throughout the amount was 657 tons of cargo and 150 country. The public was quick to pay attention to passenger cars. However, the ship actually had the fact that this disaster occurred artificially. If the cargoes of 2,142 tons, and 185 vehicles. The appropriate safeguards and crisis management ship would have to have 1565 tons of ballast procedures had been in place, it could have water, but only had 761 tons in the ballast water easily been prevented [1]. tanks which was not enough to actually stabilize the ship on the day of the disaster. This Media reports have focused on issues such as fabricated reporting risked the lives of the failure of the Korean government to manage passengers, yet the company falsified 56 of the disasters and the unethical business practices of 118 trips from January to April 2014 [6]. people related to Cheonghae Shipping, a MV- age holding company. The families of the victims Fourth, the MV crew members were found to waited months in the Pang-Mok harbor, hoping to have contributed to the tragedy by committing find dead bodies in the sea. The pressure on the bribes three members of the Incheon Coast government's inability that was the main cause of Guard after the vessel was renovated. Thereby the disaster spread widely. After the disaster, the avoiding the Cheonghae Shipping from 2 Namkung; JSRR, 25(2): 1-7, 2019; Article no.JSRR.52608 submitting important documents. Finally, the shipbuilding industry was limited, and foundation Cheonghae Shipping lowered the ship's weight work for the construction of the bow visor was by 100 tons and over-estimated the ship's not well established" [8]. Crucially, the report carrying capacity to be approved by the Korean suggested that the accident was not caused by shipbuilding company. Ultimately, the problems related to corruption, crew failure, or incompetence of the shipbuilding industry and clear regulatory failure. Instead, the "Black the production of the Chunghaejin Shipping were Swan" catastrophe occurred and all existing jointly responsible for the tragedy of the Sewol [7]. safeguards overwhelmed due to weather conditions at night [8]. 3. THE SINKING OF MS ESTONIA IN SWEDEN Since the sinking of MS Estonia, the Swedish government has worked with all interested MS Estonia sank on September 28, 1994, and parties to establish an agency to investigate the killed 852 people, including 501 Swedes and 290 cause of the accident. Table 1 summarises the Estonians. The ship was first introduced in 1980 main activities of the first year after the accident. by the Finnish company Rederiaktiebolaget and Immediately after the accident, on 29 September operated the routes between Turku (Finland), 1994, after the meeting of the Prime Ministers of Mariehamn (Finland) and Stockholm (Sweden). It Finland, Estonia and Sweden, a joint accident was sold to the Estline Maritime Company in investigation committee was formed to Estonia in 1993. All members of the crew were investigate the technical cause of the accident. qualified, and the language of communication on The second group, "analysgruppen", was formed board was Estonian, which everyone understood by the Swedish government to investigate the [8]. actions of all state bodies (including parastatal bodies) involved in dealing with accidents and MS Estonia departed from Stockholm at 7:15 pm their repercussions [8]. on September 27, and 989 people boarded. The weather showed serene breezes and mild The commission initially consists of nine maritime weather, but later weather worsened and some and judicial experts from three countries, passengers reported seasickness immediately Sweden, Estonia and Finland, and has only one after midnight. At 1 am, one of the crews heard a career politician. It was free to work loud sound like a wave of ship bow. He reported independently of the government. The analyst it as a normal occurrence, but there was no group, discussed further in the next section, ordinary incident, MS Estonia's bow visor was consists of five Swedish nationals (three scholars, dismantled at 1:15 am and seawater began to one union leader and the head of the Swedish penetrate. At 1:20 am, the crew alarmed and the Red Cross).
Recommended publications
  • Syncretistic Scientism and Dissonant Plausibility Structure: an Analysis of Worldview Orientation Among Generation Zers in South Korea
    Humanities and Social Sciences 2021; 9(1): 14-26 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/hss doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20210901.13 ISSN: 2330-8176 (Print); ISSN: 2330-8184 (Online) Syncretistic Scientism and Dissonant Plausibility Structure: An Analysis of Worldview Orientation Among Generation Zers in South Korea Steve Sang-Cheol Moon Department of Intercultural Studies, Charis Institute for Intercultural Studies, Seoul, Republic of Korea Email address: To cite this article: Steve Sang-Cheol Moon. Syncretistic Scientism and Dissonant Plausibility Structure: An Analysis of Worldview Orientation Among Generation Zers in South Korea. Humanities and Social Sciences . Vol. 9, No. 1, 2021, pp. 14-26. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20210901.13 Received : January 6, 2021; Accepted : January 13, 2021; Published : January 25, 2021 Abstract: Generation Z (‘Gen Z’) is the generation of people born approximately between 1995 and 2010 as the children of Generation X (‘Gen X’) who were born between 1965 and 1980. Gen Z is the youngest generation with the older members of its group working in society after finishing formal education. This paper addresses the religious aspects of the Gen Z culture, focusing on the issues of worldview, plausibility structure, and worldview education. It is based on an empirical research project conducted in South Korea in 2020. The research methodology used was a constructivist grounded theory approach involving interviews of 30 people who were either Gen Zers or their religious educators. The study suggests three points concerning the ontological reflection of worldview, epistemological identification through contact points, and educational bridge-making in the mission of worldview education that is devoted to teaching the core and fundamental Christian doctrines about the world and life.
    [Show full text]
  • MS Estonia with the Visor and Bow Doors Open the MS Estonia Was A
    MS Estonia with the visor and bow doors open The MS Estonia was a cruise ferry. The ship sank in 1994 during her journey from Tallinn to Stockholm. It is the deadliest shipwreck disaster to have occurred in the Baltic Sea in peacetime, costing 852 lives. On September 28 at about 01:15, the visor at the bow separated which resulted that the large ship's bow door opened. The ship immediately took on a heavy starboard list to initial 30 to 40 degrees. 15 minutes later, the ship had rolled 90 degrees and sunk within 45 minutes. Of the 989 on board, 138 were rescued alive, but one died later in hospital. Those are the official figures given to the public. Conspiracy theories exist about the cause of the sinking. German journalist Jutta Rabe claims that laboratory tests on debris recovered illegally from Estonia's bow yielded trace evidence of a deliberate explosion. Additionally, she insists that Swedish, British, and Russian governments tried to smuggle military hardware via the civilian ferry. In 2004, a former Swedish customs officer claimed that Estonia had been used to transport military equipment. Carl Övberg, a survivor and frequent passenger, reported that on the day of travel the harbor had been sealed off and that a military convoy had escorted two large trucks to the waiting ferry. Although more than 500 Swedes were among the 852 reported dead, the Swedish government has blocked every effort to recover the bodies from the wreck. Even an early offer by a Norwegian diving company to retrieve the bodies at cost was rejected.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum on Measures Taken Following the Sinking of Car Ferry Ms Estonia and Plan for Joint Action in the Nordic Countries
    MEMORANDUM ON MEASURES TAKEN FOLLOWING THE SINKING OF CAR FERRY MS ESTONIA AND PLAN FOR JOINT ACTION IN THE NORDIC COUNTRIES Working group on bow doors Maritime Department Helsinki 1994 MEMORANDUM ON MEASURES TAKEN FOLLOWING THE SINKING OF CAR FERRY MS ESTONIA AND PLAN FOR JOINT ACTION IN THE NORDIC COUNTRIES On 28 September 1994 an ad-hoc meeting led by minister of transportation Ole convened to discuss immediate measures to be taken following the sinking Norrback of car ferry Estonia. It was pointed out at the meeting that all passenger vessels regularly calling at Finnish ports are subjected to safety inspections. These inspections also include foreign vessels. The inspections are based on both international conventions and national legislation. As a response to the Estonia disaster, the parties decided on the following additional measures to be taken: 1. Inspection of bow doors in Finnish car and rail ferries The National Board of Navigation was to inspect urgently the bow and stern doors of all car and rail ferries that fly the Finnish flag and call at Finnish ports. The inspection was to include both condition and functioning of the doors as well as their alarm and monitoring systems and was to be completed within a week. The National Board of Navigation was also to verify that the passenger vessels, car and rail ferries maintain such routines that the closing of all cargo doors is secured before departure. These inspections were completed by October 8th, as follows: Vessel Year of Build Type of bow door Date Cinderella -89 butterfly type 29.09.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinking of MV Sewol - Excerpted from Wikipedia
    Sinking of MV Sewol - Excerpted from Wikipedia, The sinking of MV Sewol (Hangul: 세월호 침몰 사고; Hanja: 世越 號沈沒事故), also referred to as the Sewol Ferry Disaster, occurred on the morning of 16 April 2014, when the passenger/ro-ro ferry was en route (on the way) from Incheon towards Jeju in South Korea. The Japanese-built South Korean ferry sank while carrying 476 people, mostly secondary school students from Danwon High School (Ansan City). The 6,825-ton vessel sent a distress signal from about 2.7 kilometres (1.7 mi) north of Byeongpungdo at 08:58 Korea Standard Time (23:58 UTC, 15 April 2014). In total, 304 passengers and crew members died in the disaster. Of the approximately 172 survivors, more than half were rescued by fishing boats and other commercial vessels that arrived at the scene approximately 40 minutes after the South Korean coast guard. The sinking of Sewol resulted in widespread social and political reaction within South Korea. Many criticized the actions of the captain and most of the crew. Also criticized were the ferry operator and the regulators who oversaw its operations, along with the South Korean government for its disaster response (including the poor showing of the then Korean coastguard) and attempts to downplay government culpability. (to weaken the governmental responsibility) THE SINKING OF MV SEWOL 1 On 15 May 2014, the captain and three crew members were charged with murder, while the other 11 members of the crew were indicted for (be accused of) abandoning the ship. An arrest warrant was also issued for Yoo Byung-eun, the owner of Chonghaejin Marine, which operated Sewol, but he could not be found despite a nationwide manhunt (a nationwide seeking for a guilty man).
    [Show full text]
  • The MS Estonia Sinking Was Planned
    return to updates The MS Estonia Sinking was Planned by Miles Mathis First published March 12, 2021 As usual, this is just my opinion, based on personal research. This paper is by request. Just a cursory glance at the facts is enough to peg this sinking as another purposeful scuttling by the ship's owners, to get rid of an old, damaged ship and collect insurance money. Which of course means the deaths were faked. For the MO here, consult my papers on the Titanic, the Lusitania , and the Hindenburg, where we saw their demises were also faked or planned. Unlike in the other stories, Wikipedia doesn't give us much to work with here, but the biggest clues there are the signs of a coverup. As with the Lusitania, the wreckage of the Estonia was immediately hidden by the governments of Sweden, Finland, and Estonia, proving they were in on the fake. The Estonia Agreement 1995, a treaty among Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Poland, Denmark, Russia and the United Kingdom, declared sanctity over the site, prohibiting their citizens from even approaching the wreck. That is enough by itself to peg this as a conjob. If there was nothing to hide, that fake “sanctity” would not be necessary. We always see the same phony appeals to the sanctity of the dead in these cons, possibly the worst of them in the aftermath of 911, where we were told asking any questions or expecting any investigations was an insult to the dead. Just the opposite of the truth, of course, since if these people were really dead, both their ghosts and their families would want a full investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Finnish Studies
    JOURNAL OF FINNISH STUDIES Volume 16 Number 1 August 2012 Journal of Finnish Studies JOURNAL OF FINNISH STUDIES EDITORIAL AND BUSINESS OFFICE Journal of Finnish Studies, Department of English, 1901 University Avenue, Evans 458 (P.O. Box 2146), Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TEXAS 77341-2146, USA Tel. 1.936.294.1402; Fax 1.936.294.1408 SUBSCRIPTIONS, ADVERTISING, AND INQUIRIES Contact Business Office (see above & below). EDITORIAL STAFF Helena Halmari, Editor-in-Chief, Sam Houston State University; [email protected] Hanna Snellman, Co-Editor, University of Helsinki; [email protected] Scott Kaukonen, Associate Editor, Sam Houston State University; [email protected] Hilary Joy Virtanen, Assistant Editor, University of Wisconsin; [email protected] Sheila Embleton, Book Review Editor, York University; [email protected] EDITORIAL BOARD Varpu Lindström, University Professor, York University, Toronto, Chair Börje Vähämäki, Founding Editor, JoFS, Professor Emeritus, University of Toronto Raimo Anttila, Professor Emeritus, University of California, Los Angeles Michael Branch, Professor Emeritus, University of London Thomas DuBois, Professor, University of Wisconsin Sheila Embleton, Distinguished Research Professor, York University, Toronto Aili Flint, Emerita Senior Lecturer, Associate Research Scholar, Columbia University, New York Anselm Hollo, Professor, Naropa Institute, Boulder, Colorado Richard Impola, Professor Emeritus, New Paltz, New York Daniel Karvonen, Senior Lecturer, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Andrew Nestingen,
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical-Institutionalist Analysis of the MV Sewol and MS Estonia Tragedies: Policy Lessons from Sweden for South Korea*
    A Historical-Institutionalist Analysis of the MV Sewol and MS Estonia Tragedies: Policy Lessons from Sweden for South Korea* Jörg Michael Dostal**, Hyun-jin Kim***, and Albin Ringstad**** Abstract: On April 16, 2014, the South Korean ship MV Sewol sank, claiming the lives of 304 passengers. The accident appeared to observers to be a man- made disaster, since all the passengers could have been rescued if adequate safety measures and disaster management procedures had been in place. The Sewol sinking has subsequently turned into a focusing event in terms of safety policy debates in South Korea. On September 28, 1994, the Swedish ship MS Estonia sank, claiming the lives of 852 people. This earlier tragedy was also a focusing event in the context of Swedish debates about safety policies. In this article, South Korean and Swedish safety policies are analyzed from a historical-institutionalist perspective. While Swedish disaster prevention systems have generally performed well in a virtuous cycle, those of South Korea have performed poorly in a vicious cycle. The article highlights how South Korean policy makers might use Swedish policies, developed in response to the 1994 MS Estonia accident, to improve their safety policies. In addition, we suggest that long-term policies focusing on comprehensive social welfare and the pooling of risks are required to restore citizens’ trust in government and to transform South Korea from a low safety into a high safety society. Keywords: historical institutionalism, Korea, MS Estonia, MV Sewol, safety policy, Sweden **** Earlier versions of this article were presented at the Korean Association for Policy Studies and Korean Association for Public Administration conferences in Seoul on December 5 and December 12, 2014, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sinking of MS Estonia: Still Doubts Over Official Story 24 Years After the Biggest Maritime Disaster in Europe Since World War II
    The Sinking of MS Estonia: Still Doubts Over Official Story 24 Years After the Biggest Maritime Disaster in Europe Since World War II By Terje Maloy Region: Europe Global Research, September 18, 2018 Theme: History, Law and Justice, Media Disinformation Just after midnight, in the first hour of September 28th, 1994, the passenger ferry MS Estonia sank in the Baltic Sea. It was sailing its regular route, from Tallinn in Estonia to the Swedish capital Stockholm. The vessel capsized and sank in less than an hour, in the end settling sideways on the ocean floor at 80 meters deep. The weather was rough, but nothing extraordinary for the time of year, with winds of 25 meters/second and waves of 4 to 6 meters. Of the 989 passengers and crew, 852 died, making it the biggest European maritime disaster since WW2. 501 of the dead were Swedes. Just hours after the sinking, Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bildt was quick to try to control the narrative of what had happened. In a statement to the public, he announced that the sinking happened because the bow visor (the front part protecting the bow of the ship, which can be lifted up to allow the car ramp to be extended), had fallen off due to being pounded by the waves. The same afternoon Bildt called the Swedish minister responsible for maritime affairs, saying the same thing, ‘There are no other explanations’. And he called Hans Laidwa from the Estline shipping agency, the owner of MS Estonia, telling him ‘The accident must have been caused by a construction error’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ctu Code – the Incident of Grounding Why We Need It of M.V
    ISSUE 20 MARCH 95 21 THE REPORT The Magazine of the International Institute of Marine Surveying The CTU Code - why we need it VAT on Yachts post Brexit Costly claims for crane failures caused by human errors The Estonia disaster continues to be a bottomless source of learning President’s column: The new order after Brexit - what we know THE REPORT The Magazine of the International Institute of Marine Surveying MARCH 2021 • ISSUE 95 60 • THE ESTONIA DISASTER 84 • SURVEYING RIVETS Contents CONTINUES TO BE A AND RIVETING - PART 1 BOTTOMLESS SOURCE 92 • A MULTI-SLAT HYDROFOIL OF LEARNING SOLUTION FOR LOW-SPEED 04 • EDITOR’S LETTER 64 • COSTLY CLAIMS FOR SAILING IN HEAVY SEAS 05 • THE PRESIDENT’S CRANE FAILURES CAUSED 94 • NEW PRODUCTS COLUMN BY HUMAN ERRORS 100 • THOUGHT FOR THE DAY - 10 • IIMS ORGANISATION 66 • FROM COMPOSITE EVOLUTION PROTECTING YOURSELF - AND STRUCTURE TO VESSEL CONSTRUCTION COMMUNICABLE DISEASE 11 • MARINE NEWS REVOLUTION EXCLUSIONS 21 • SAFETY BRIEFINGS 70 • CORROSION-RESISTANT STEELS 103 • A DAY IN THE LIFE OF... FOR CARGO OIL TANKS 30 • MEMBER NEWS CAPT PURNENDU SHOREY 72 • FAULT TREE ANALYSIS OF 38 • THE CTU CODE – THE INCIDENT OF GROUNDING WHY WE NEED IT OF M.V. “C.S CIGNE” 46 • NEW INSIGHTS INTO MSC 78 • AKZONOBEL UNLOCKS ZOE IN SHALLOW WATER MORE SUSTAINABLE FUTURE THAT REQUIRE FURTHER FOR COATINGS AFTER ACTION TO PREVENT FUTURE BIOMASS BREAKTHROUGH CONTAINER LOSS 80 • NEW GUIDANCE DOCUMENT 48 • TACKLING THE SCOURGE OF FOR CARGO AND CARGO HOLD CONTAINER SHIP FIRES VENTILATION PUBLISHED 50 • CONTAINER STACK 60 COLLAPSES - CAUSES AND SOLUTIONS 54 • THE SERIOUS HEALTH RISKS OF A POLLUTED OCEAN 57 • VAT ON YACHTS - WHAT HAS CHANGED SINCE 31 DECEMBER 2020? 57 64 5 38 The Report • March 2021 • Issue 95 | 3 Editor’s Letter Dear Colleague shipping and cargo in this edition.
    [Show full text]
  • (2018) Carroll Round Proceedings.Pdf
    The Carroll Round at Georgetown University Box 571016 Washington, DC 20057 Tel: (202) 687-5696 Fax: (202) 687-1431 [email protected] http://carrollround.georgetown.edu The Seventeenth Annual Carroll Round Steering Committee Olivia Bisel, chair Shine Aung Grady Killeen Arjun Krishnan Joshua Levy Duy Mai Parker Malarkey Meggie Underwood Elinor Walker Jacob Witt Crystal Zhu Carroll Round Proceedings Copyright © 2018 The Carroll Round Georgetown University, Washington, DC http://carrollround.georgetown.edu All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photography, recording, or an information storage and retrieval system, without the written permission of the contributing authors. The Carroll Round reserves the copyright to the Carroll Round Proceedings volumes. Original works included in this volume are printed by consent of the respective authors as established in the “Non-Exclusive Copyright Agreement.” The Carroll Round has received permission to copy, display, and distribute copies of the contributors’ works through the Carroll Round website (carrollround.georgetown.edu) and through the annual proceedings publication. The contributing authors, however, retain the copyright and all other rights including, without limitation, the right to copy, distribute, publish, display, or modify the copyright work, and to transfer, assign, or grant license of any such rights. The views expressed in the enclosed papers are those of the authors
    [Show full text]
  • ESTONIA: Capabilities, Organisations, Policies, and Legislation in Crisis Management and Disaster Response
    ESTONIA: Capabilities, Organisations, Policies, and Legislation in crisis management and disaster response Philip Spassov ÅÑÒÎÍÈß: Ñïîñîáíîñòè, îðãàíèçàöèÿ, ïîëèòèêè è çàêîíîäàòåëñòâî çà óïðàâëåíèå íà êðèçè è ðåàãèðàíå ïðè áåäñòâèÿ IT4Sec Reports 124 http://dx.doi.org/10.11610/it4sec.0124 ESTONIA: Capabilities, Organisations, Policies, and Legislation in crisis management and disaster response Philip Spassov Institute of Information and Communication Technologies CSDM | Centre for Security and Defence Management www.IT4Sec.org Sofia, March 2015 Philip Spassov, ESTONIA: Capabilities, Organisations, Policies, and Legislation in crisis management and disaster response, IT4Sec Reports 124 (March 2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.11610/it4sec.0124 IT4SecReports 124 „ESTONIA: Capabilities, Organisations, Policies, and Legislation in crisis management and disaster response“ This report looks into the Estonian crisis management system, built around the Ministry of Interior, which is responsible for policy formulation and its execution in the area of civil security. The author further presents the various levels of the system – regional, county and local. The report draws particular attention to the Estonian Rescue Board that is directly subordinated to the Ministry of Interior and has a key role in representing Estonia in various international forums such as the UN, EU and NATO and other relevant civil security organisations, and to the Emergency Response Centre. Philip Spassov offers a thorough examination of the legislative base of the Estonian crisis
    [Show full text]
  • Paw Print Jr. June 2019
    Maple Hill Jr. PawPrint Issue 4 June 2019 Summer Poetry If you have ever been on a road trip or you are looking forward to one this summer, you will be able to relate to this poem! Maybe you will write a road trip poem this summer! Road Trip By Oriana Letzelter, grade 7 In New York, you pack up and leave fast, In New Jersey, you*beep**beep**beep*and* honk honk honk*! ​ ​ ​ In Delaware, you leave with lots and lots of speed, In Maryland, you wait wait wait for traffic to go, In Washington D.C. you go around it so you aren't stressed, In Virginia, you have lots of fun and finally, get some rest. In a week, you have to repeat in reverse! My NBA Mock Draft By: Brady Cole, grade 7 There is an NBA draft every year that introduces teenagers and some young adults get drafted to their dream job, playing basketball for millions of dollars a year. There is a draft lottery, so these teams know exactly which pick they get. Then, a week after, the players that declared to be drafted, there is an NBA combine. The NBA combine is where players measure height, weight, body fat, that stuff. Then they do drills and they go through those and then they have a 5 on 5 scrimmage. The teams get the players’ info, and can decide to schedule workouts with them. In the upcoming weeks, these guys can decide whether to go back to college, or go into the draft. There is a 3 week span where NBA teams can trade their picks, and then the draft begins.
    [Show full text]