December 2016 Vol. 18, No. 3 January 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

December 2016 Vol. 18, No. 3 January 2017 E D I T E D B Y C A R L B A K E R BRAD GLOSSERMAN S E P T E M B E R – DECEMBER 2016 VOL. 18, NO. 3 JANUARY 2017 CC.CSIS.ORG PACIFIC FORUM CSIS Based in Honolulu, Hawaii, the Pacific Forum CSIS operates as the autonomous Asia-Pacific arm of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1975, the thrust of the Forum’s work is to help develop cooperative policies in the Asia-Pacific region through debate and analyses undertaken with the region’s leaders in the academic, government, and corporate arenas. The Forum’s programs encompass current and emerging political, security, economic/business, and oceans policy issues. It collaborates with a network of more than 30 research institutes around the Pacific Rim, drawing on Asian perspectives and disseminating its projects’ findings and recommendations to opinion leaders, governments, and publics throughout the region. An international Board of Governors guides the Pacific Forum’s work. The Forum is funded by grants from foundations, corporations, individuals, and governments, the latter providing a small percentage of the forum’s annual budget. The Forum’s studies are objective and nonpartisan and it does not engage in classified or proprietary work. EDITED BY CARL BAKER, PACIFIC FORUM CSIS BRAD GLOSSERMAN, PACIFIC FORUM CSIS SEPTEMBER – DECEMBER 2016 VOL. 18, NO. 3 JANUARY 2017 HONOLULU, HAWAII COMPARATIVE CONNECTIONS A TRIANNUAL ELECTRONIC JOURNAL ON EAST ASIAN BILATERAL RELATIONS Bilateral relationships in East Asia have long been important to regional peace and stability, but in the post-Cold War environment, these relationships have taken on a new strategic rationale as countries pursue multiple ties, beyond those with the US, to realize complex political, economic, and security interests. How one set of bilateral interests affects a country’s other key relations is becoming more fluid and complex, and at the same time is becoming more central to the region’s overall strategic compass. Comparative Connections, Pacific Forum’s triannual electronic journal on East Asian bilateral relations edited by Carl Baker and Brad Glosserman, with Ralph A. Cossa serving as senior editor, was created in response to this unique environment. Comparative Connections provides timely and insightful analyses on key bilateral relationships in the region, including those involving the US. We regularly cover key bilateral relationships that are critical for the region. While we recognize the importance of other states in the region, our intention is to keep the core of the e-journal to a manageable and readable length. Because our project cannot give full attention to each of the relationships in Asia, coverage of US-Southeast Asia and China-Southeast Asia countries consists of a summary of individual bilateral relationships, and may shift focus from country to country as events warrant. Other bilateral relationships may be tracked periodically (such as various bilateral relationships with Australia, India, and Russia) as events dictate. Our Occasional Analyses also periodically cover functional areas of interest. Our aim is to inform and interpret the significant issues driving political, economic, and security affairs of the US and East Asian relations by an ongoing analysis of events in each key bilateral relationship. The reports, written by a variety of experts in Asian affairs, focus on political/security developments, but economic issues are also addressed. Each essay is accompanied by a chronology of significant events occurring between the states in question during the four-month period. A regional overview section places bilateral relationships in a broader context of regional relations. By providing value- added interpretative analyses, as well as factual accounts of key events, the e-journal illuminates patterns in Asian bilateral relations that may appear as isolated events and better defines the impact bilateral relationships have upon one another and on regional security. The online version of Comparative Connections is available at https://cc.csis.org. Comparative Connections: A Triannual Electronic Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations (print ISSN 1930-5370, online E-ISSN 1930-5389) is published three times annually (January, May, and September) at 1003 Bishop Street, Suite 1150, Honolulu, HI 96813. TABLE OF CONTENTS REGIONAL OVERVIEW US ASIA POLICY, SYMBOLICALLY SPEAKING ...................................................... 1 BY RALPH COSSA, PACIFIC FORUM CSIS & BRAD GLOSSERMAN, PACIFIC FORUM CSIS Once every four years, our Regional Overview attempts to reassure our readers that, despite a new US administration and/or new secretary of state, US Asia policy will remain generally consistent. This year we are trying to reassure ourselves. It is, of course, premature to be making firm pronouncements about an incoming administration’s policies, but by now signals are usually becoming pretty clear. It seemed safe to assume (as we did at the time), that the incoming Obama administration would pursue the same general policies and national security objectives in the Asia-Pacific as its predecessor: support for existing alliances as the foundation of regional security policy, constructive engagement with China, support for free trade and promotion of human rights, and a strong deterrence posture regarding North Korea, combined with firm support for nonproliferation regimes. This could yet be the case for the incoming Trump administration, but the signals are, at best, mixed, in part because we find ourselves responding to tweets – which transition team spokesmen caution should be taken “symbolically” not literally – rather than clear policy pronouncements. As a result, regional leaders, while hoping for the best (or at least more of the same) seem to be preparing themselves for a variety of outcomes, even as some try to shape the future environment. US-JAPAN RELATIONS US-JAPAN RELATIONS AND THE TRUMP EFFECT .............................................. 9 BY SHEILA SMITH, COUNCIL ON FOREIGN R ELATIONS & CHARLES MCCLEAN, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEG O The US presidential election was the primary influence affecting US-Japan relations in the fall of 2016. Japan was brought into the spotlight during the campaign with Trump repeatedly criticizing Tokyo for unfair trade practices and free riding in the alliance. The outcome of the election left many Japanese worried about the future of the alliance. Prime Minister Abe quickly reached out to President-elect Trump, arranging a meeting with him in New York on Nov. 18. Beyond the attention given to the election, the LDP and Abe also sought to support the Obama administration by ratifying the Trans- Pacific Partnership and promoting maritime capacity building in Southeast Asia. President Obama and Prime Minister Abe met for the last time in Hawaii on Dec. 27. Uncertainty abounds on the economic and strategic fronts in the coming year, but the biggest unknown for the bilateral relationship will be the new US president and his approach to Asia. III US-CHINA RELATIONS CHINA PREPARES FOR ROCKY RELATIONS IN 2017 ....................................... 17 BY BONNIE GLASER, CSIS/PACIFIC FORUM & ALEXANDRA VIERS, CSIS Summits between Barack Obama and Xi Jinping in September and November helped to keep tensions in check in the last four months of 2016. Despite persisting differences over how much pressure to impose on North Korea after Pyongyang conducted its fifth nuclear test, the US and China agreed on a new UN Security Council sanctions resolution. The US Navy conducted another freedom of navigation operation (FONOP) near the Paracel Islands in the South China Sea. A Chinese Navy vessel snatched a US drone, claiming it was threatening the safety of the Chinese ship and its crew, and returned it to the US five days later. Incremental progress was made on trade disputes at the 27th annual US-China Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade (JCCT) in Washington, DC. Meanwhile, the election of Donald Trump as the next US president threatened to inject significant uncertainty into US-China relations as Trump received a phone call from Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen and suggested that he might use Taiwan as a bargaining chip to extract concessions from China on other issues. US-KOREA RELATIONS UNREST AND TESTS ............................................................................................ 27 BY STEPHEN NOERPER, KOREA SOCIETY AND CO LUMBIA UNIVERSITY North Korea opened the final months of 2016 with a bang by conducting its fifth nuclear test on Sept. 9. It followed up with a series of rocket and missile tests, culminating the year with Kim Jong Un’s claim of an imminent long-range ballistic missile capability. Yet, political transition in South Korea and the United States proved the hallmarks of late 2016, suggesting potential shifts in the approaches on the Peninsula, while underscoring the firm commitment of the US and ROK to their alliance. The Park-Choi scandal led to massive protests the final two months of the year and an impeachment vote on Dec. 9 by the National Assembly, confusing political observers about the implications for South Korean political stability. Donald Trump’s surprise victory in the US raised questions among Koreans about US reliability as an alliance partner. US-SOUTHEAST ASIA RELATIONS PHILIPPINE FOLLIES .......................................................................................... 33 BY SHELDON SIMON, ARIZONA STATE UNIVER SITY & CARL BAKER, PACIFIC FORUM CSIS The
Recommended publications
  • MATTHEW EBDEN AUS @Mattebden @Mattebdentennis @Matt Ebden
    MATTHEW EBDEN AUS @mattebden @mattebdentennis @matt_ebden BORN: 26 November 1987, Durban, South Africa HEIGHT / WEIGHT: 1.88m (6'2") / 80kg (176lbs) RESIDENCE: Perth, Australia PLAYS: Right-handed · Two-handed backhand CAREER W-L: 68-106 CAREER PRIZE MONEY: $2,932,255 CAREER W-L VS. TOP 10: 3-9 HIGHEST ATP RANKING: 39 (22 October 2018) CAREER 5TH-SET RECORD: 2-3 HIGHEST ATP DOUBLES RANKING: 57 (25 June 2012) 2018 HIGHLIGHTS CAREER FINALIST (1): 2017 (1): Newport > Idols growing up were Stefan PRIZE MONEY: $961,714 (G). Edberg and Andre Agassi. W-L: 19-22 (singles), 10-16 (doubles) CAREER DOUBLES TITLES (4). FINALIST (1). > Hobbies are going to the beach, SINGLES SF (2): ’s-Hertogenbosch, surfing, movies and computer Atlanta PERSONAL games. Enjoys collecting QF (3): Halle, Chengdu, Shanghai > Began playing tennis at age 5 watches and studying with his family in South Africa. horology. CAREER HIGHLIGHTS > Moved to Australia at age 12. > If he wasn't a tennis player, he > Achieved career-high No. 39 on > Went to high school at would probably be a lawyer. 22 October 2018 following prestigious Hale School in > Enrolled at University of personal-best 19th win of Perth. Western Australia to pursue a season. Broke into Top 50 on 16 > Father, Charles, is a chief law/commerce degree, but July 2018 after reaching financial officer and played deferred to play pro tennis. Wimbledon 3R. Rose 600+ spots state cricket and tennis in > Favourite sports team is the from No. 695 to No. 76 in 2017. South Africa; mother, Ann, is a Wallabies (Rugby Union).
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
    China Data Supplement March 2008 J People’s Republic of China J Hong Kong SAR J Macau SAR J Taiwan ISSN 0943-7533 China aktuell Data Supplement – PRC, Hong Kong SAR, Macau SAR, Taiwan 1 Contents The Main National Leadership of the PRC ......................................................................... 2 LIU Jen-Kai The Main Provincial Leadership of the PRC ..................................................................... 31 LIU Jen-Kai Data on Changes in PRC Main Leadership ...................................................................... 38 LIU Jen-Kai PRC Agreements with Foreign Countries ......................................................................... 54 LIU Jen-Kai PRC Laws and Regulations .............................................................................................. 56 LIU Jen-Kai Hong Kong SAR ................................................................................................................ 58 LIU Jen-Kai Macau SAR ....................................................................................................................... 65 LIU Jen-Kai Taiwan .............................................................................................................................. 69 LIU Jen-Kai ISSN 0943-7533 All information given here is derived from generally accessible sources. Publisher/Distributor: GIGA Institute of Asian Studies Rothenbaumchaussee 32 20148 Hamburg Germany Phone: +49 (0 40) 42 88 74-0 Fax: +49 (040) 4107945 2 March 2008 The Main National Leadership of the
    [Show full text]
  • Syncretistic Scientism and Dissonant Plausibility Structure: an Analysis of Worldview Orientation Among Generation Zers in South Korea
    Humanities and Social Sciences 2021; 9(1): 14-26 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/hss doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20210901.13 ISSN: 2330-8176 (Print); ISSN: 2330-8184 (Online) Syncretistic Scientism and Dissonant Plausibility Structure: An Analysis of Worldview Orientation Among Generation Zers in South Korea Steve Sang-Cheol Moon Department of Intercultural Studies, Charis Institute for Intercultural Studies, Seoul, Republic of Korea Email address: To cite this article: Steve Sang-Cheol Moon. Syncretistic Scientism and Dissonant Plausibility Structure: An Analysis of Worldview Orientation Among Generation Zers in South Korea. Humanities and Social Sciences . Vol. 9, No. 1, 2021, pp. 14-26. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20210901.13 Received : January 6, 2021; Accepted : January 13, 2021; Published : January 25, 2021 Abstract: Generation Z (‘Gen Z’) is the generation of people born approximately between 1995 and 2010 as the children of Generation X (‘Gen X’) who were born between 1965 and 1980. Gen Z is the youngest generation with the older members of its group working in society after finishing formal education. This paper addresses the religious aspects of the Gen Z culture, focusing on the issues of worldview, plausibility structure, and worldview education. It is based on an empirical research project conducted in South Korea in 2020. The research methodology used was a constructivist grounded theory approach involving interviews of 30 people who were either Gen Zers or their religious educators. The study suggests three points concerning the ontological reflection of worldview, epistemological identification through contact points, and educational bridge-making in the mission of worldview education that is devoted to teaching the core and fundamental Christian doctrines about the world and life.
    [Show full text]
  • CONICYT Ranking Por Disciplina > Sub-Área OECD (Académicas) Comisión Nacional De Investigación 1
    CONICYT Ranking por Disciplina > Sub-área OECD (Académicas) Comisión Nacional de Investigación 1. Ciencias Naturales > 1.2 Computación y Ciencias de la Científica y Tecnológica Informática PAÍS INSTITUCIÓN RANKING PUNTAJE USA Carnegie Mellon University 1 5,000 CHINA Tsinghua University 2 5,000 USA University of California Berkeley 3 5,000 USA Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 4 5,000 Nanyang Technological University & National Institute of Education SINGAPORE 5 5,000 (NIE) Singapore USA Stanford University 6 5,000 SWITZERLAND ETH Zurich 7 5,000 HONG KONG Chinese University of Hong Kong 8 5,000 FRANCE Universite Paris Saclay (ComUE) 9 5,000 INDIA Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT System) 10 5,000 SINGAPORE National University of Singapore 11 5,000 USA University of Michigan 12 5,000 USA University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign 13 5,000 GERMANY Technical University of Munich 14 5,000 CHINA Harbin Institute of Technology 15 5,000 CHINA Shanghai Jiao Tong University 16 5,000 USA Georgia Institute of Technology 17 5,000 UNITED KINGDOM University of Oxford 18 5,000 UNITED KINGDOM Imperial College London 19 5,000 CHINA Peking University 20 5,000 USA University of Southern California 21 5,000 USA University of Maryland College Park 22 5,000 CHINA Zhejiang University 23 5,000 USA University of Texas Austin 24 5,000 USA University of Washington Seattle 25 5,000 CHINA Huazhong University of Science & Technology 26 5,000 USA University of California San Diego 27 5,000 USA University of North Carolina Chapel Hill 28 5,000 HONG KONG
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
    China Data Supplement May 2007 J People’s Republic of China J Hong Kong SAR J Macau SAR J Taiwan ISSN 0943-7533 China aktuell Data Supplement – PRC, Hong Kong SAR, Macau SAR, Taiwan 1 Contents The Main National Leadership of the PRC .......................................................................... 2 LIU Jen-Kai The Main Provincial Leadership of the PRC ..................................................................... 30 LIU Jen-Kai Data on Changes in PRC Main Leadership ...................................................................... 37 LIU Jen-Kai PRC Agreements with Foreign Countries ......................................................................... 42 LIU Jen-Kai PRC Laws and Regulations .............................................................................................. 44 LIU Jen-Kai Hong Kong SAR ................................................................................................................ 45 LIU Jen-Kai Macau SAR ....................................................................................................................... 52 LIU Jen-Kai Taiwan .............................................................................................................................. 56 LIU Jen-Kai ISSN 0943-7533 All information given here is derived from generally accessible sources. Publisher/Distributor: GIGA Institute of Asian Studies Rothenbaumchaussee 32 20148 Hamburg Germany Phone: +49 (0 40) 42 88 74-0 Fax: +49 (040) 4107945 2 May 2007 The Main National Leadership of the PRC
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
    China Data Supplement October 2006 J People’s Republic of China J Hong Kong SAR J Macau SAR J Taiwan ISSN 0943-7533 China aktuell Data Supplement – PRC, Hong Kong SAR, Macau SAR, Taiwan 1 Contents The Main National Leadership of the PRC 2 LIU Jen-Kai The Main Provincial Leadership of the PRC 30 LIU Jen-Kai Data on Changes in PRC Main Leadership 37 LIU Jen-Kai PRC Agreements with Foreign Countries 44 LIU Jen-Kai PRC Laws and Regulations 48 LIU Jen-Kai Hong Kong SAR 49 Political, Social and Economic Data LIU Jen-Kai Macau SAR 56 Political, Social and Economic Data LIU Jen-Kai Taiwan 60 Political, Social and Economic Data LIU Jen-Kai ISSN 0943-7533 All information given here is derived from generally accessible sources. Publisher/Distributor: GIGA Institute of Asian Affairs Rothenbaumchaussee 32 20148 Hamburg Germany Phone: +49 (0 40) 42 88 74-0 Fax: +49 (040) 4107945 2 October 2006 The Main National Leadership of the PRC LIU Jen-Kai Abbreviations and Explanatory Notes CCP CC Chinese Communist Party Central Committee CCa Central Committee, alternate member CCm Central Committee, member CCSm Central Committee Secretariat, member PBa Politburo, alternate member PBm Politburo, member Cdr. Commander Chp. Chairperson CPPCC Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference CYL Communist Youth League Dep. P.C. Deputy Political Commissar Dir. Director exec. executive f female Gen.Man. General Manager Gen.Sec. General Secretary Hon.Chp. Honorary Chairperson H.V.-Chp. Honorary Vice-Chairperson MPC Municipal People’s Congress NPC National People’s Congress PCC Political Consultative Conference PLA People’s Liberation Army Pol.Com.
    [Show full text]
  • And Type in Recipient's Full Name
    ATP MEDIA INFORMATION ATP CHALLENGER TOUR BY THE NUMBERS FINAL 2019 VERSION 2019 Win-Loss Pct. Leaders W-L Pct. Titles 1) Ricardas Berankis LTU 24-3 .889 4 2) Tommy Paul USA 30-5 .857 3 3) Ugo Humbert FRA 21-5 .808 3 4) Jannik Sinner ITA 28-7 .800 3 5) Mikael Ymer SWE 39-10 .796 4 6) Alejandro Davidovich ESP 34-11 .756 1 7) Emil Ruusuvuori FIN 36-12 .750 4 8) Jozef Kovalik SVK 28-10 .737 2 9) James Duckworth AUS 49-18 .731 4 10) Gregoire Barrere FRA 26-10 .722 2 11) Soon-woo Kwon KOR 35-14 .714 2 Hugo Dellien BOL 25-10 .714 2 Alexander Bublik KAZ 20-8 .714 3 14) Andrej Martin SVK 47-19 .712 3 15) Chris O’Connell AUS 32-13 .711 2 *Minimum 25 matches played* Match Wins Leader: James Duckworth AUS – 49 wins 2019 Singles Title Leaders: ----- By Surface ----- Player Total Clay Grass Hard Carpet Ricardas Berankis LTU 4 4 James Duckworth AUS 4 1 3 Emil Ruusuvuori FIN 4 4 Mikael Ymer SWE 4 1 3 Pablo Andujar ESP 3 3 Alexander Bublik KAZ 3 3 Ugo Humbert FRA 3 3 Gianluca Mager ITA 3 2 1 Andrej Martin SVK 3 3 Thiago Monteiro BRA 3 3 Tommy Paul USA 3 1 2 Jannik Sinner ITA 3 3 Biggest Movers To Top 100 Ranking Jump Year-End 2018 – 2019 ’19 Titles 1) Jannik Sinner ITA +685 763 – 78 3 2) Jo-Wilfried Tsonga FRA +230 259 – 29 1 3) Mikael Ymer SWE +207 281 – 74 4 4) Soonwoo Kwon KOR +165 253 – 88 2 5) Daniel Evans GBR +157 199 – 42 2 6) James Duckworth AUS +145 245 – 100 4 7) Alejandro Davidovich Fokina ESP +144 231 – 87 2 Youngest Finals: Nicola Kuhn (19) d.
    [Show full text]
  • China to Keep Watch on TPP
    Table for strangers Hainan helps visitors Memory protection Special police target tourism An app connects amateur chefs industry irregularities in Sanya with willing dining companions Database to be created on > CHINA, PAGE 4 > LIFE, PAGE 9 the Nanjing Massacre > p3 MONDAY, October 12, 2015 chinadailyusa.com $1 COMMERCE China to keep watch on TPP Such trade deals can disrupt non-signatories: offi cial By ZHONG NAN highly unlikely that the TPP would in Beijing lead to the creation of a trade bloc [email protected] that excludes China. “The economic development China will conduct comprehensive mode in China has already changed and systematic assessments of the from low-end product trade to ‘going fallout from the Trans-Pacifi c Part- global’ strategies like setting up or nership, a broad agreement between moving manufacturing facilities and 12 Pacifi c Rim countries, including to more direct investment in over- Japan and the United States, since it seas markets,” said Fan. believes that such deals have disrup- Besides the US, other signatories tive eff ects on non-signatory nations, to the TPP are Australia, Brunei, a top government offi cial said. Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mex- Commerce Minister Gao Hucheng ico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore said China is of the view that changes and Vietnam. in the global trade pattern should be China has to date signed bilateral decided by adjustments in the indus- and multilateral free trade agree- trial structure and through product ments with seven TPP members. competitiveness in global
    [Show full text]
  • Sinking of MV Sewol - Excerpted from Wikipedia
    Sinking of MV Sewol - Excerpted from Wikipedia, The sinking of MV Sewol (Hangul: 세월호 침몰 사고; Hanja: 世越 號沈沒事故), also referred to as the Sewol Ferry Disaster, occurred on the morning of 16 April 2014, when the passenger/ro-ro ferry was en route (on the way) from Incheon towards Jeju in South Korea. The Japanese-built South Korean ferry sank while carrying 476 people, mostly secondary school students from Danwon High School (Ansan City). The 6,825-ton vessel sent a distress signal from about 2.7 kilometres (1.7 mi) north of Byeongpungdo at 08:58 Korea Standard Time (23:58 UTC, 15 April 2014). In total, 304 passengers and crew members died in the disaster. Of the approximately 172 survivors, more than half were rescued by fishing boats and other commercial vessels that arrived at the scene approximately 40 minutes after the South Korean coast guard. The sinking of Sewol resulted in widespread social and political reaction within South Korea. Many criticized the actions of the captain and most of the crew. Also criticized were the ferry operator and the regulators who oversaw its operations, along with the South Korean government for its disaster response (including the poor showing of the then Korean coastguard) and attempts to downplay government culpability. (to weaken the governmental responsibility) THE SINKING OF MV SEWOL 1 On 15 May 2014, the captain and three crew members were charged with murder, while the other 11 members of the crew were indicted for (be accused of) abandoning the ship. An arrest warrant was also issued for Yoo Byung-eun, the owner of Chonghaejin Marine, which operated Sewol, but he could not be found despite a nationwide manhunt (a nationwide seeking for a guilty man).
    [Show full text]
  • MATCH NOTES CINCINNATI - USA, OH | Aug 13 - Aug 19, 2018 | $2,874,299 | PREMIER 5
    MATCH NOTES CINCINNATI - USA, OH | Aug 13 - Aug 19, 2018 | $2,874,299 | PREMIER 5 [1] SIMONA HALEP (ROU #1) vs. LESIA TSURENKO (UKR #44) Head to Head: SIMONA HALEP leads 4-0 2014 WIMBLEDON GRASS O R2 SIMONA HALEP 6-3 4-6 6-4 109 mins 2013 'S-HERTOGENBOSCH GRASS O QF SIMONA HALEP 6-3 6-1 69 mins 2012 LINZ HARD I R1 SIMONA HALEP 3-0 19 mins 2009 ITF/OPOLE CARPET I R16 SIMONA HALEP 6-4 7-5 SIMONA HALEP LESIA TSURENKO 1 WTA RANKING 44 1 PORSCHE RACE TO SINGAPORE LEADERBOARD 35 27-09-1991 (26) DATE OF BIRTH (AGE) 30-05-1989 (29) $6,005,336 YTD PRIZE MONEY $633,870 $26,741,351 CAREER PRIZE MONEY $3,249,281 3 / 18 SINGLES TITLES (YTD / CAREER) 1 / 4 1 / 1 DOUBLES TITLES (YTD / CAREER) 0 / 0 18-6 CINCINNATI W-L (MD) * 5-2 44-7 / 325-147 YTD / CAREER W-L (MD) * 21-13 / 112-128 16-3 / 95-48 YTD / CAREER 3-SET W-L (MD) * 7-3 / 36-34 4-3 / 39-49 YTD / CAREER TIE-BREAK W-L (MD) * 4-1 / 28-28 26-3 / 189-91 YTD / CAREER HARD W-L (MD) * 15-8 / 77-75 8-0 / 33-11 YTD / CAREER Left Hander W-L (MD) * 1-3 / 7-19 2-2 / 10-27 YTD / CAREER TOP 5 W-L (MD & Q) * 0-1 / 0-8 6-3 / 33-44 YTD / CAREER TOP 10 W-L (MD & Q) * 1-2 / 6-18 15-4 / 90-66 YTD / CAREER TOP 20 W-L (MD & Q) * 6-2 / 17-28 * Updated entering 2018 Cincinnati QF ROAD TO THE QUARTERFINALS [1] SIMONA HALEP (ROU #1) vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Monfils Seeks Elusive Title, History on Line for Rublev
    QATAR EXXONMOBIL OPEN: DAY 6 MEDIA NOTES Saturday, 6 January 2018 Khalifa International Tennis and Squash Complex | Doha, Qatar | 1-6 January 2018 Draw: S-32, D-16 | Prize Money: $1,286,675 | Surface: Outdoor Hard ATP World Tour Info Tournament Info ATP PR & Marketing ATPWorldTour.com QatarTennis.org Martin Dagahs: [email protected] Twitter: @ATPWorldTour @QatarTennis Press Room: +974 44409621 Facebook: @ATPWorldTour @QatarTennis TV & Radio: TennisTV.com MONFILS SEEKS ELUSIVE TITLE, HISTORY ON LINE FOR RUBLEV Gael Monfils is 6-20 in ATP World Tour finals and 0-3 with the Qatar ExxonMobil Open title on the line. On Saturday against Andrey Rublev, he can start anew with a championship to begin 2018. The Frenchman arrived as a wild card following a four-month hiatus due to a right knee injury. Monfils has found success in familiar territory, falling to then-No. 1 Roger Federer (2006), then-No. 6 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga (2012) and then-No. 1 Rafael Nadal (2014) in his previous Doha finals. Monfils is one of three wild cards to reach the final in Doha’s 26-year tournament history, joining Younes El Aynaoui in 1996 and Nicolas Escude in 2004. Escude, also from France, is the only wild card to win the Doha title. Monfils’ first final in Doha came as a 19-year-old, but his 20-year-old opponent on Saturday is bidding to become the youngest Qatar ExxonMobil Open champion ever. Rublev is through to the final despite hitting a total of 33 double faults in his four victories this week. INFOSYS ATP SCORES & STATS Qatar ExxonMobil Open [WC] Gael
    [Show full text]
  • CONICYT Ranking Por Disciplina > Sub-Área OECD (Académicas) Comisión Nacional De Investigación 2
    CONICYT Ranking por Disciplina > Sub-área OECD (Académicas) Comisión Nacional de Investigación 2. Ingeniería y Tecnología > 2.11 Otras Ingenierías y Tecnologías Científica y Tecnológica PAÍS INSTITUCIÓN RANKING PUNTAJE INDIA Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT System) 1 5,000 CHINA Harbin Institute of Technology 2 5,000 FRANCE Universite Paris Saclay (ComUE) 3 5,000 CHINA Tsinghua University 4 5,000 GERMANY Technical University of Munich 5 5,000 CHINA Zhejiang University 6 5,000 CHINA Shanghai Jiao Tong University 7 5,000 CHINA Beihang University 8 5,000 SINGAPORE Nanyang Technological University & National Institute of Education 9 5,000 CHINA Huazhong University of Science & Technology 10 5,000 SWITZERLAND ETH Zurich 11 5,000 USA University of California Berkeley 12 5,000 USA Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 13 5,000 ITALY Polytechnic University of Milan 14 5,000 ITALY University of Naples Federico II 15 5,000 USA University of Maryland College Park 16 5,000 IRAN Islamic Azad University 17 5,000 CHINA South China University of Technology 18 5,000 USA Stanford University 19 5,000 ITALY University of Bologna 20 5,000 SINGAPORE National University of Singapore 21 5,000 USA University of Wisconsin Madison 22 5,000 CHINA Jiangnan University 23 5,000 USA California Institute of Technology 24 5,000 USA Purdue University 25 5,000 BELGIUM Ghent University 26 5,000 USA University of Michigan 27 5,000 NETHERLANDS Wageningen University & Research 28 5,000 GERMANY RWTH Aachen University 29 5,000 BELGIUM KU Leuven 30 5,000 CHINA Wuhan
    [Show full text]