Pulcheria (Greek: Πουλχερια , Pro - Upatriarchal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pulcheria (Greek: Πουλχερια , Pro - Upatriarchal Detail of the base of the obelisk erected in Constantinople by Theodosius I. (Wikimedia Commons) NTIL modern times societies were women who have been influential behind Pulcheria (Greek: Πουλχερια , pro - Upatriarchal. The word means “father the scenes. While a man might have nounced Pool-keria) was the daughter ruler”. The father was the head of the thought he was in charge, there was a of the emperor Arcadius (383-408) family and the boss of everybody. Men woman who was pulling the strings and and the granddaughter of the emperor were in charge and women were confined controlling everything. Such a woman Theodo sius I (379-395). Theodosius I to household duties and raising children. was Pulcheria, the sister of the Roman (Figure 1) had been born in Spain and But throughout history there have been emperor Theodosius II (402-450 AD). was a suc cessful general in the Roman army before Gratian, the emperor of the western hal f of the empire, asked him to become the emperor of the east - ern half. Constantinople was the capital in the east and Rome in the west. ( Fig - ure 2 – map ) Following the conversion to Christian - ity of Constantine the Great (307-337) the number of Christians in the Roman Empire gradually increased, and Theo - dosius I was a Christian who was intol - erant of other religions. He outlawed the old Greek and Roman religion even if the ceremonies were conducted in private. Sacrificing in temples was banned and the temples were closed. Although these Figure 1 – Bronze coin of Theodosius I minted at Antioch in 393. Diameter 22 mms. Sear, Vol. 5, 20492. were harsh measures he felt that they were necessary to unify the empire, but he was never a persecutor of people as some of the earlier Roman emperors had been. Before he died Theodosius I decreed that his sons should succeed him. So Arcadius ( Figure 3 ) became the empero r of the east and Honorius ( Figure 4 ) the emperor of the west. Arcadius was eighteen when he became emperor and Honorius only ten, but even as adults they were incompetent. Julius Norwich in his book Byzantium, the Early Centuries described Arcadius: “Small, dark and swarthy, slow in speech and movement, with heavy-lidded eyes that always seemed about to close in sleep, he was in fact even stupider than he looked; and his character was as weak as his in tellect.” Sadly his wife, the beautiful Figure 2 – Map of Europe in the 5 th century. The eastern half of the Roman Empire is the shaded area. Eudoxia ( Figure 5 ), made fun of him in public, but somehow the empire managed brother’s reign she was the effective ruler Eudoxia, who subsequently married the to trundle along. of the empire. Actually this was not a western emperor Valentinian III ( Fig - Arcadius had one son, Theodosius II bad thing because she was an intelligent, ure 13 ). He was the son of Galla Placidia (Figures 6 and 7 ), and three daughters. capable woman, and Theodosius II was (Figure 14 ) whose adventurous life is Theodosius II was only seven years old quite happy to leave the affairs of state related in the February 2018 issue of when his father died, but fortunately to her. He was certainly not stupid. In CAB. his guardian, Anthemius, was a capable fact he was a cultured intellectual. He Coin collectors need to realize that the administrator. He ordered that great loved the art of copying and illustrating die-engravers responsible for producing walls be built to protect Constantinople, manuscripts ( Figures 10 and 11 ) and the images of these 5 th century emperors and these walls, known as the Theodosian people called him the calligrapher. Accor- and empresses were not interested in Walls ( Figure 8 ), kept the citizens safe ding to David Vagi, the author of Coin- their actual appearance. On the coins for a thousand years until the city was age and History of the Roman Empire , they all look the same. This is a different taken by Muslim invaders in 1453. “Theodosius was kind, generous, schol - The eldest child of Arcadius was Pul - arly and peaceful – indeed he possessed cheria ( Figure 9 ). She was two years all the wrong qualities to lead an empire older than her brother, and at age fifteen constantly under siege. He was a skilled she succeeded Anthemius as the power calligrapher, and applied this talent to behind the throne. For the rest of her his all-consuming passion of religion by patiently copying old manuscripts into the late hours of the night.” In keeping with his scholarly interests he founded the University of Constantinople in 425 and supervised the formation of the Theo- dosian Code, which was a compilation of all the laws issued after 312. It was published in 438. Pulcheria was quite different: she cer - tainly possessed all the right qualities to lead the empire. She had inherited her grandfather’s talents, but according to Norwich she was “excessively, extrav - agantly pious.” He wrote that the imper - ial palace “thronged from morning till night with priests and monks while the princesses, all three of whom had vowed themselves to perpetual virginity, stitched away at their altar-cloths and chasubles to the sound of hymns, psalmodies and muttered prayers.” Pulcheria’s influence was pervasive. When a beautiful and intelligent young woman called Athenais came to the Figure 5 – Bronze coin of Eudoxia, the wife of palace in connection with a legal matter Arcadius. Diameter 12 mms. The hand of God holds a wreath above her head. On the reverse Pulcheria decided that she would make Victory inscribes the Chi-Rho monogram of a suitable wife for her brother and she Christ on a shield. Sear Vol. 5, 20892. introduced her to him immediately. (Figure 12 ) Her name was changed to Eudocia, she was given a crash course in Figure 3 – Bronze coin of Arcadius minted at Antioch in 383. The hand of God holds a Christianity, and the couple were duly wreath above his head. Diameter 22 mms. married. At first the marriage was a Sear, Vol. 5, 20788. success and they had a daughter, Licinia Figure 4 – Gold solidus minted for Honorius at Constantinople between 408 and 420. Diameter Figure 6 – 5 th century marble head of Theodo - 21 mms. On the reverse Constantinopolis sits on a throne with her right foot on a ship’s sius II in the Louvre. (Wikimedia Commons: prow. Sear, Vol. 5, 20902. photo by Marie-Lan Nguyen) situation from that in the first two cen - of Jerusalem gave her two sacred relics, sadly she fell out with her husband and turies of the Roman Empire when the the bones of St Stephen, the first Chris - sister-in-law. What actually happened is emperors and their wives were shown tian martyr, and the chain that held St unknown. Perhaps Pulcheria became as they really were, warts and all. The Peter by the wrists when he was impris - jealous of Eudocia whom Theodosius sus- chubby face of Nero is easily recognized oned by King Agrippa I. Peter’s miracu - pected of having an affair with a courtier. on his coins as is the big nose of Nerva, lous escape from the prison is recorded but by Pulcheria’s time it was simply the in Acts, chapter 12. Eudocia took them person’s status that mattered, not their back with her to Constantinople, but she individual appearance. It seems that the gave some of the chain to her daughter idea of the individual was subsumed Eudoxia, who immediately built a church into the spiritual ethos of the age. In in Rome to receive the precious gift. a world of officially sanctioned piety Another chain said to have tethered Peter hu mility not egotism was the norm. before his martyrdom in Rome was In 438 Eudocia went on pilgrimage to added, and today they can all be seen Jerusalem. It was a great success and in the church known as San Pietro in the people of Jerusalem called her the Vincoli (St Peter in Chains). ( Figure 15 ) new Helena, after Constantine’s mother When Eudocia returned to Constan - who had also visited the city. The bishop tinople her popularity was sky-high. Then Figure 9 – Gold tremissis of Pulcheria minted at Figure 7 – Gold solidus of Theodosius II minted at Constantinople between 441 and 450. Diameter Constantinople between 414 and 453. Diam. 15 20 mms. Theodosius holds a spear and a shield on which a horseman spears a fallen enemy. mms.Sear, Vol. 5, 21256. There is also a solidus, Constantinopolis is on the reverse. Sear, Vol. 5, 21140. (Collection of St John’s Cathedral, Brisbane) semissis, siliqua and bronze centenionalis . Figure 8 – The walls of Constantinople (modern Is tanbul) built during the reign of Theodosius II. (Wikimedia Commons: photo by Laima Gütmane) The situation became intolerable for During his reign a general council of the Eudocia and she moved to Jerusalem, church was called to determine a matter never to return to Constantinople. Her of great importance for Christianity. In MAKE YOUR FIRST story is related in the September 2013 451 AD bishops came from all over the issue of CAB. empire to the church of St Euphemia, a When Theodosius II died unexpectedly woman who had been terribly tortured CALL TO THESE in 450 it was a critical time for the em - and martyred during the Diocletian pire because there was no male heir, but persecutions at the beginning of the 4 th Pulcheria took charge of the situation. century. The church was in the city of SUPPORTING She chose an elderly soldier, Marcian Chalcedon, which was just across the (Figure 16 ), to be the emperor.
Recommended publications
  • Historic Girls; Stories of Girls Who Have Influenced the History of Their Times
    Title: Historic Girls; Stories of Girls Who Have Influenced the History of Their Times Author: Elbridge Streeter Brooks Language: English Subject: Fiction, Literature, Children's literature Publisher: World Public Library Association Copyright © 2008, All Rights Reserved Worldwide by World Public Library, www.WorldLibrary.net World Public Library The World Public Library, www.WorldLibrary.net is an effort to preserve and disseminate classic works of literature, serials, bibliographies, dictionaries, encyclopedias, and other reference works in a number of languages and countries around the world. Our mission is to serve the public, aid students and educators by providing public access to the world's most complete collection of electronic books on-line as well as offer a variety of services and resources that support and strengthen the instructional programs of education, elementary through post baccalaureate studies. This file was produced as part of the "eBook Campaign" to promote literacy, accessibility, and enhanced reading. Authors, publishers, libraries and technologists unite to expand reading with eBooks. Support online literacy by becoming a member of the World Public Library, http://www.WorldLibrary.net/Join.htm. Copyright © 2008, All Rights Reserved Worldwide by World Public Library, www.WorldLibrary.net www.worldlibrary.net *This eBook has certain copyright implications you should read.* This book is copyrighted by the World Public Library. With permission copies may be distributed so long as such copies (1) are for your or others personal use only, and (2) are not distributed or used commercially. Prohibited distribution includes any service that offers this file for download or commercial distribution in any form, (See complete disclaimer http://WorldLibrary.net/Copyrights.html).
    [Show full text]
  • Numismatic and Metrological Parallels for the Iconography of Early Byzantine Marriage Jewelry
    Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College History of Art Faculty Research and Scholarship History of Art 2010 Numismatic and Metrological Parallels for the Iconography of Early Byzantine Marriage Jewelry. The Question of the Crowned Bride Alicia Walker Bryn Mawr College, [email protected] Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.brynmawr.edu/hart_pubs Custom Citation Alicia Walker, "Numismatic and Metrological Parallels for the Iconography of Early Byzantine Marriage Jewelry. The Question of the Crowned Bride," Travaux et Mémoires 16 (2010): 1-14. This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/hart_pubs/58 For more information, please contact [email protected]. COLLEGE DE FRANCE - CNRS CENTRE DE RECHERCHE D'HISTOIRE ET CIVILISATION DE BYZANCE ORIENT ET MEDITERRANEE (UMR 8167) - BYZANCE COLLEGE DE FRANCE - INSTITUT D'ETUDES BYZANTINES TRAVAUXET MEMOlRES TRAVAUX ET MEMOlRES Fondes par Paul LEMERLE Continues par Gilbert DAGRON 16 Comite de redaction : Jean-Claude CHEYNET, Vincent DEROCHE, Denis FEISSEL, Bernard FLUSIN, Constantin ZUCKERMAN MELANGES Secretariat de redaction, relecture et composition: Emmanuelle CAPET Avec Ie concours de Delphine LAURITZEN CECILE MORRISSON Ouvrage pub/ie avec fe concours de fa fondation Ebersoft du College de France et de l'universite Paris-Sorbonne ©Association des Amis du Centre d'Histoire et Civilisation de Byzance - 2010 Association des Amis du Centre d'Histoire et Civilisation de Byzance ISBN 978-2-916716-28-2 52, rue du Cardinal-Lemoine - 75005 Paris ISSN 0577-1471 2010 NUMISMATIC AND METROLOGICAL PARALLELS FOR THE ICONOGRAPHY OF EARLY BnANTINE MARRIAGE JEWELRY THE QUESTION OF THE CROWNED BRIDE' by Alicia WALKER Within the material culture ofearly Byzantium, a corpus ofjewelry-including rings, pendants, and belts-depicts marriage iconography, which usually consists ofa man and woman flanking a cross or figure ofChrist.
    [Show full text]
  • Jews in Constantinople
    IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Panayotov Alexander (22/12/2008) Για παραπομπή : Panayotov Alexander , "Jews in Constantinople (Byzantine period)", 2008, Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Κωνσταντινούπολη URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=11982> Jews in Constantinople (Byzantine period) Περίληψη : 1. The sources A synagogue in the Copper Market of Constantinople is first mentioned by Theophanes the Confessor (ca760-12th March 817) in relation to the construction of the church of the Mother of God in AD 449-450. According to his description the church was built by Pulcheria the sister of Theodosius II (408-450) and supplanted the existing synagogue. The text of Theophanes’Chronography runs as follows: Then she built the church of the Copper Market for the holy Mother of God, which had previously been a Jewish synagogue.|| However, later in his work Theophanes returns again to the construction of the church stating this time that it was built in AD 576- 577 by Justin II (565-578) : In this year the emperor Justin took away the synagogue of the Hebrews, the one in the Chalkoprateia, and built the church of our Lady, the holy Mother of God, which is near the Great Church. The contradiction between the passages raises questions about the historical reliability of the evidence provided by Theophanes. As Mango has rightly noted, in the latter passage Theophanes re-edits his earlier source on the basis of a later one. A possible explanation for the attribution of the church to Justin II can be found in the description of Constantinople preserved in P£tria K wnstantinoupÒlewj III, 32: The [church of the] holy Mother of God [in] the Copper Market was previously, under Constantine the Great, occupied by Jews who had been there for 132 years and were selling copper handiwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Pu1cheria's Crusade A.D. 421-22 and the Ideology of Imperial Victory Kenneth G
    Pulcheria's Crusade A.D. 421-22 and the Ideology of Imperial Victory Holum, Kenneth G Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1977; 18, 2; Periodicals Archive Online pg. 153 Pu1cheria's Crusade A.D. 421-22 and the Ideology of Imperial Victory Kenneth G. Holum .. 'EST qu'en effet l'empereur byzantin, comme son ancetre Cl'imperator des derniers siecles de Rome, est essentiellement, aux yeux de son peuple, un maitre victorieux." This pointed definition (from the pen of Jean Gagel) underscores a theme of imperial ideology which receives such insistent emphasis in the offi­ cial art, ceremonial and panegyric of late antiquity that it must correspond to a chilling reality. The defeat of an emperor threatened not only the integrity of the frontiers but internal stability as well and the ascendancy of the emperor and his friends. Conversely, if a weak emperor could claim a dramatic victory, he might establish a more effective hold on the imperial power. In A.D. 420-22 this inner logic of Roman absolutism led to innovations in imperial ideology and to a crusade against Persia, with implications which have escaped the attention of scholars. The unwarlike Theodosius II made war not to defend the Empire but to become "master of victory," and, as will be seen, to strengthen the dynastic pretensions of his sister Pulcheria Augusta. I The numismatic evidence is crucial. Between 420 and early 422 the mint of Constantinople initiated a strikingly new victory type, the much-discussed 'Long-Cross Solidi' (PLATE 2):2 Obverse AELPVLCH-ERIAAVG Bust right, diademed, crowned by a hand Reverse VOTXX MVLTXXX~ Victory standing left, holding a long jeweled cross, CONOB in the exergue 1 "l:Taupoc VLK01TOLbC: la victoire imperiale dans l'empire chretien," Revue d'histoire et de philosophie religieuses 13 (1933) 372.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Pulcheria
    Saint Pulcheria Virgin, Empress of the Eastern Roman Empire In 399 AD, in the city of Constantinople, Aelia to have bishops reinstated who had been unjustly Pulcheria was born to the Easter Roman Emperor Flavius dismissed. Arcadius, and his wife Aelia Eudoxia. Arcadius was a In 421 AD, when Bishop Atticus reported the week and easily controlled emperor, reigning during a persecution of Christians by the Sasanian King Bahram V time when the empire was being invaded by various after the destruction of a Zoroastrian temple, Pulcheria Gothic armies comprised primarily of Arian-Christians influenced her brother to send troops to defend the who believed Jesus Christ, the Son, was a creation of the Christians in the Sassanid Empire. After a successful Father, rather than of one substance with the Father. campaign which Theodosius attributed to his sisters piety Pulcheria had an older sister who had passed away young. and virginity, Christians were allowed to return to In 400 AD, her sister Arcadia would be born, followed by Sassanid. During this time, Theodosius married a pagan Theodosius II and Mariana in 401 AD. In 402 AD, who took the name Aelia Eudocia, and converted to Arcadius went on to declare his one year old son Christianity. Theodosius II to be his co-Emperor. In 431 AD, the Ecumenical Council of Ephesus Despite the fact that Pulcheria’s family were was called to address an issue with the Nestorius of Nicene-Christians and accepted the reality of the Trinity, Constantinople, who denied Mary as the Theotokos, the her mother Eudoxia was in constant conflict with the “God-bearer.” Pulcheria supported Cyril of Alexandria, Patriarch of Constantinople, Saint John Chrysostom.
    [Show full text]
  • Birkbeck Institutional Research Online
    Birkbeck ePrints BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online Enabling open access to Birkbeck’s published research output Cracking the codex: late Roman law in practice Journal Article http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/4977 Version: Accepted (Refereed) Citation: Humfress, C. (2006) Cracking the codex: late Roman law in practice Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 49(1), pp.241-254 © 2006 Wiley Blackwell Publisher Version ______________________________________________________________ All articles available through Birkbeck ePrints are protected by intellectual property law, including copyright law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. ______________________________________________________________ Deposit Guide Contact: [email protected] Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 49 (publ. 2007), 251-64. Cracking the Codex: Late Roman Legal Practice in context. Caroline Humfress, Birkbeck College Introduction. Sometime between the second and fourth decades of the fourth century AD (probably shortly after the year 324, but just possibly as late as 348) the advocate Ammon wrote a letter home to his Mother in Panopolis, a major city of the Thebaid.1 Despite his own stated preference for a ‘…quiet life free from intrigue (as) befits those educated in philosophy and rhetoric…’2, 1 P.Ammon I 3 = The Archive of Ammon Scholasticus of Panopolis I: The Legacy of Harpocration (Pap. Colon. XXVI/1), edd. W.H. Willis and K. Maresch (Opladen, 1997), 19-46, dating P. Ammon I 3 to AD 348. For full discussion of the letter and its literary context see P. Van Minnen, ‘The Letter (and Other Papers) of Ammon: Panopolis in the Fourth Century AD’ in Perspectives on Panopolis.
    [Show full text]
  • A Homily of Consolation Concerning Pulcheria.Pdf
    A HOMILY OF CONSOLATION CONCERNING PULCHERIA INTRODUCTION1 To be sure, the profuse outpouring of grief in this oratio consolatoria strikes the modern reader as not simply excessive but contrived. However, familiarity with addresses of a similar vein not only composed by Gregory of Nyssa but by other ancient Christian authors reveals that this style is fairly typical of the period in its lavish expression of sorrow2. As I had remarked in the first note just above, Pulcheria3, the daughter of the Emperor Theodosius (+395) and Empress Flacilla, died quite young. Therefore little is know of this child of illustrious Christian rulers who had championed the cause of Christian orthodoxy against Arianism which denied the divinity of Jesus Christ. Gregory, bishop of Nyssa and brother of Basil the Great, was indeed on familiar terms with the imperial household, and his intimate glimpse into its affairs as detailed in this oratio reveals a lively popular attachment for the emperor's private affairs. In accord with this popular sentiment, Gregory mentions that "we experienced a real tremor (seismos) which did not mitigate these harsh circumstances" (J.462.29-463.1). Here he most likely was comparing the child's death to a recent earthquake to which the area of Asia Minor and the seat of the Eastern Roman Empire, Constantinople, was prone. His homily was given on the occasion of "that time of year...when we recall [Pulcheria]" (J.461.6-7). Not only does the image of an earthquake dominate Gregory's opening words-- for they are perhaps the most graphic image at his immediate disposal--but the same image reverberates to the faithful's memory (mneme) which "shudders with sorrow" (J.461.7-8).
    [Show full text]
  • Basiliscus the Boy-Emperor , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 24:1 (1983:Spring) P.81
    CROKE, BRIAN, Basiliscus the Boy-Emperor , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 24:1 (1983:Spring) p.81 Basiliscus the Boy-Emperor Brian Croke OR THE FIFTH AND SIXTH centuries the Chronicle of Victor of F Tunnuna is a valuable source that deserves close inspection. What may not always be sufficiently appreciated, because Victor is most frequently referred to as an African bishop and because he wrote in Latin, is that he spent a good deal of his later life in Con­ stantinople. His Chronicle, which covers the years 444-567, was in fact written in Constantinople and is a generally well-informed source for events in the East during this period.1 Like so many other African bishops, Victor fell foul of his sover­ eign Justinian by defending the works condemned by the emperor in 543 in the so-called Three Chapters edict. This resulted in a trying period of internment for Victor in the Mandracion monastery near Carthage, then on the Balearic Islands, then Algimuritana, and finally with his episcopal colleague Theodore of Cebaruscitana in the prison of the Diocletianic fortress behind the governor's palace in Alexan­ dria (Chron. s.a. 555.2, p.204). In 556 after a twelve-day trial in the praetorium Victor and Theodore were transferred to the Tabennesiote monastery near Canopus, twelve miles east of Alexandria (556.2, p.204). Nine years later, at the request of Justinian himself, Victor and Theodore were summoned from Egypt. At the imperial court they stood their ground in the argument over the 'Three Chapters' with both Justinian and the patriarch Eutychius.
    [Show full text]
  • 25011016 Justinian
    "Our Most Pious Consort Given Us by God": Dissident Reactions to the Partnership of Justinian and Theodora, A.D. 525-548 Author(s): Charles Pazdernik Source: Classical Antiquity, Vol. 13, No. 2 (Oct., 1994), pp. 256-281 Published by: University of California Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25011016 Accessed: 12-01-2017 22:58 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25011016?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Classical Antiquity This content downloaded from 128.228.173.41 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:58:39 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms CHARLES PAZDERNIK "Our Most Pious Consort Given Us by God": Dissident Reactions to the Partnership of Justinian and Theodora, A.D. 525-548 T E VIVIDNESS with which the reign of Justinian I and his empress Theodora holds our imagination emerges no less from the coloring given the period in the writings of contemporary figures than from the events themselves, however momentous they were.
    [Show full text]
  • Virgin Mary Coin
    This set highlights a pivotal moment in the history of Christianity: when the Virgin Mary is acknowledged not just as the mother of Jesus, but as the Mother of God. Christianity did not wipe out pagan beliefs as much as it assimilated them into the new religion. Worship of various local gods and goddesses continued in modified form as veneration of the saints. And no saint was venerated more than Mary, the Virgin Mother of Jesus Christ. She represented the Female in an otherwise male-dominated trinity. Her cult was relatively small until the reign of the Emperor Arcadius (A.D. 395-408). His eldest daughter Pulcheria dedicated herself to Mary at a young age, inspiring her father to build a number of churches dedicated to the Virgin Mary. Their enthusiastic involvement with Marian veneration transformed what was a fledgling cult into arguably the most popular in Christendom. Pulcheria spearheaded the movement to proclaim Mary as the Mother of God (as opposed to just the mother of the human Jesus), which was formally achieved at the Council of Ephesos. Arcadius, for his part, conceded to his daughter’s every request, and was thus the earliest and most influential Marian benefactors. Without Arcadius, Mary may never have become the Madonna, and would not have the prominence she now enjoys. This is a genuine ancient bronze coin from the reign of the Eastern Roman Emperor Arcadius (A.D. 395-408), son of Theodosius the Great, the last man to rule both the Eastern and Western halves of the empire. As such, Arcadius is considered by some to be the first Byzantine emperor.
    [Show full text]
  • Church – State Relations During the Theodosian
    “LUCIAN BLAGA” UNIVERSITY OF SIBIU FACULTY OF ORTHODOX THEOLOGY “ANDREI ŞAGUNA” SUMMARY OF DOCTORAL DISSERTATION CHURCH – STATE RELATIONS DURING THE THEODOSIAN DYNASTY (378 – 438) Scientific Coordinator: Revd. Prof. PhD Nicolae Chifăr Candidate: PhD Student Dragoş Boicu 2013 Content Argument ............................................................................................................................. 1 General introduction ............................................................................................................ 3 A. Preliminary elements ................................................................................................. 3 A.1. Theme ................................................................................................................. 3 A.2. Purpose ............................................................................................................... 4 A.3. Structure ............................................................................................................. 5 A.4. Method ............................................................................................................... 6 A.5. Stage of research ................................................................................................ 7 B. Brief outline of church – state relations in the Roman Empire until Theodosius the Great (27 B.C. – 378 A.D.) ............................................................... 15 B.1. From man to god: the imperial cult until Constantine the Great – the
    [Show full text]
  • The Gender of Money: Byzantine Empresses on Coins (324–802)’ Gender & History, Vol.12 No
    Gender & History ISSN 0953–5233 Leslie Brubaker and Helen Tobler, ‘The Gender of Money: Byzantine Empresses on Coins (324–802)’ Gender & History, Vol.12 No. 3 November 2000, pp. 572–594. The Gender of Money: Byzantine Empresses on Coins (324–802) Leslie Brubaker and Helen Tobler Coins played different roles in the ancient and medieval worlds from those that they play in the economy today. In the late antique and early Byzantine world – that is, roughly between 300 and 800 – there were in a sense two currencies: gold coins and base metal (copper) coins. Both were minted and distributed by the state, but the gold solidi (in Latin) or nomismata (in Greek), introduced in 309, were by the end of the fifth century in practice used above all for the payment of tax and for major transactions such as land sales, while the copper coins (nummi, replaced in 498 by folles) were broadly the currency of market transactions.1 Another striking difference is that late antique and Byzantine coin types changed with great frequency: as an extreme example, Maria Alföldi catalogued over seven hundred different types for a single emperor, Constantine I the Great (306–37, sole ruler from 324).2 There are many reasons for this, but one of the most import- ant has to do with communication: centuries before the advent of the press, images on coins were a means to circulate information about the state. This is particularly true of the first three and a half centuries covered by this article. While the extent to which coins were used in daily exchange transactions is still uncertain, and was very variable, the frequency with which they appear in archaeological excavations of urban sites throughout the former eastern Roman empire until 658 indicates their wide diffusion.
    [Show full text]