BOARD of SUPERVISORS Agenda

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Agenda

September 8, 2014

WORK SESSION

AGENDA BEDFORD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

BEDFORD COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING SEPTEMBER 8, 2014

5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION a. Scott Baker, Extension Agent, with a presentation of the Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy in Virginia’s Region 2000. b. Todd Daniel and Brian Casella, VDOT Residency Office, with an update on road projects and issues. 6:45 P.M. Dinner a

Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy in Virginia’s Region 2000

September 8, 2014

1 About

THOMAS P. MILLER AND ASSOCIATES, LLC • Fo unded in 1989 • Based in Indianapolis, IN with offices in Lexington, KY and Youngstown, OH • F ull-service economic and workforce development consulting firm with extensive research and strategic planning experience

2 Project Background • The Local Government Council received a grant from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS) to develop an economic development strategic plan for agriculture and forestry

• Formed a Strategic Plan Coordinating Team including leadership from local economic development organizations and local Virginia Cooperative Extension (VCE) offices

• Representing Bedford: • Traci Blido – Director of Economic Development • Scott Baker – Agricultural Extension Agent

3 Approach

SWOT Quantitative Final Asset Map Local Input One-on-One Analysis/ Data Strategic Inventory sessions Interviews Planning Analysis Plan Session

•Over 95 individuals participate in interviews, input sessions, and/or planning sessions

4 Economic Impact of Agriculture and Forestry in the Region

Source: Economic Impacts of the Agriculture and Forest Industries in Virginia June 2013: http://www.coopercenter.org/sites/default/files/publications/Virginia%20A gricultureForest%202012reva.pdf

Vision Statement

We recognize and promote the agriculture and forestry industries to strengthen regional economic development and future sustainability.

6 Three Goal Areas

GOAL #1 – COORDINATE REGIONAL OUTREACH AND MARKETING GOAL #2 – STRENGTHEN RESOURCES FOR PRODUCERS GOAL #3 – PROMOTE CAREER AND SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES

7 8 Priority Project #1 – Develop a regional agriculture and forestry website • Promotes the industries to internal and external audiences • Serves as the regional source for news, workshop announcements, technical assistance, available grants, agri-tourism, etc. • Incorporates asset map of regional resources – organizations, agencies, services, etc. • Informs about regional producers – available crops and products

9 Priority Project #1 – Develop a regional agriculture and forestry website

10 Priority Project #1 – Develop a regional agriculture and forestry website

11 Priority Project #2 – Complete a Regional Food Hub Feasibility Study • What is a ‘Food Hub’? • Entity that manages the aggregation, storage, distribution, and marketing of locally grown foods

• Why is it Important? • New marketing opportunities for producers – locally grown is in-demand • Links rural producers to suburban/urban consumers • Lowers entry barriers and improves infrastructure to create and expand regional food markets • Potential to create new jobs

12 Priority Project #2 – Complete a Regional Food Hub Feasibility Study • Regional Food Hub Feasibility Study • Quantify regional consumer interest in the concept and preferences for produce and products (e.g. meats, cheeses, honey, etc.) • Determine interest from regional farmers and their requirements for participation • Understand the best model – central facility, pick-up and drop-off locations, publicly or privately run, etc. • Define action steps for launch of a food hub • Leverage the existing Food Hub Planning Committee

13 Next Steps • Focus on priority projects

• Regional agriculture and forestry website • Food hub feasibility study

• Explore funding opportunities and ways to approach collaboratively • Prepare and submit grant applications to AFID, USDA, and other funding sources

• Strategic Plan Coordinating Team • Maintain momentum and target immediate actions • Annual meeting to review progress against defined actions

14 Questions or Comments Scott Baker Senior Extension Agent, Agriculture and Natural Resources Unit Coordinator 122 East Main Street, Suite 102 Bedford, VA 24523 540-586-7675 [email protected]

Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy in Virginia’s Region 2000

July 2014

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | i

Acknowledgements

The completion of the Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy in Virginia’s Region 2000 would not have been possible without the leadership and guidance of the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team. They actively supplied their honest, thoughtful input and foresight to genuinely shape the development of this plan. Team Members include:

 Scott Baker – Virginia Cooperative Extension (VCE) Bedford County  John Benner – Virginia Cooperative Extension (VCE) Amherst County  Traci Blido – Bedford County, Office of Economic Development  Jeremy Bryant – Amherst County Planning and Zoning Department  Kevin Camm – Virginia Cooperative Extension (VCE) City of Lynchburg  Lee Cobb – Amherst County Economic Development  Mike Davidson – Campbell County Economic Development  Philipp Gabathuler – Virginia’s Region 2000 Local Government Council  Leslie Hoglund – Central Virginia Health District  Bruce Jones – Virginia Cooperative Extension (VCE) Appomattox County  Todd Scott – Virginia Cooperative Extension (VCE) Campbell County  Jeff Taylor – Appomattox County Economic Development  Michael Van Ness – Lynchburg Grows  Bob White – Virginia’s Region 2000 Local Government Council

Additionally, a big thank you to the following individuals who participated in one-on-one interviews and local input sessions. Regional and Statewide Participants  Anne Marie Clarke, Robert E. Lee Soil and Water Conservation District  Greg Farmer, President, Colonial Farm Credit  Dr. Jewel Hairston, Dean, College of Agriculture, Virginia State University  Dr. Alan Grant, Dean, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia Tech University  Jimmy Jones, Georgia Pacific  Dr. Lincoln Montgomery-Rodgers, Agrarian Veterinary Services  Paige Pratt, Virginia Tech Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences  Wren Roberts, Centra Health Systems  Andy Seibel, Virginia FFA Association  Jeff Wilkerson, Westover Dairy (The Kroger Company)

Amherst County  Scott Barnes, Morris Orchard  Robert M. Curd, Clover Hill Farm  Donna Meeks, Sweet Briar College  Henry S. Myers, The Canebrakes Farm  Frank Walton, Buffalo River Ranch  Len Thompson, Vineyards

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | i

 Bill Tucker, Tucker Family Farms

Appomattox County  Ron Coleman, Coleman & Sons Farm Supply  W.A. Coleman, Cattle and Appomattox Farm Bureau Board Member  Matt English, Sheep and Livestock Auctioneer  Kenneth Goin, Tobacco, Cattle and Appomattox Farm Bureau Board of Directors Member  Jack Goin, Cattle producer and Appomattox Farm Bureau Board Member  John O. Harrison, Cattle, Timber, and Robert E. Lee SWCD Vice Chairman  Danny Hix, Hix Brothers Farm – Tobacco, Cattle, and Saw Mill Operator  Fred H. Jones, Fred H. Jones Well Company and Grain  Mary Lund, Lund Angus Farm – Beef  Larry Majerus, Beef  Nelson Mann, Appomattox Farm Bureau Board of Director member  Cynthia Spiggle, Poultry  Dennis Torrence, Hay and Robert E. Lee SWCD Board Member  Cecil Wooldridge, Cattle

Bedford County  Craig Coker, Bedford County Economic Development Authority  Jerry Craig, Bedford County Planning Commission  Rodney Dellis, Farm Credit  Sam Gardner, Farm Bureau Young Farmers  John Hicks, Bedford-Augusta Co-op  Danny Johnson, Johnson’s Orchard  W.P. Johnson, Bedford Agricultural Economic Development Advisory Board, Farm Bureau Young Farmers  Todd Kready, Forestry  Dorothy McIntyre, Forest Farmers Market  Lucy Overstreet, Idlewild Farm  Jeff Powers, Bedford Agricultural Economic Development Advisory Board  Mark Reeter, Bedford County Administrator  Barbara Rezzonico, Bedford School System  Steve Wilkerson, Bedford County Board of Supervisors  Sam Williams, Bedford Southern State

Campbell County  Paul Anctil, Vineyard & Winery  Walter Bass, Jr., Sod  W B Bass. III, Sod  Bryan Bennett, President Campbell County Farm Bureau  James Bennett, Beef  Kevin Dawson, Virginia Dept. of Forestry – Campbell County  Carter Elliott, Dairy  Charles Fariss, Beef  Frank Goff, Goats and Small Ruminants

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | ii

 Mark Gregory, Beef  Mark Guthrie, Aquaculture – Prawns  Charles Hogue, Beef  H. B. Hunter, Goat and Dairy, President of Campbell County Leadership Extension Council  Clint Jones, High School Ag Teacher  George Jones, President Campbell County Cattlemen’s Association  Shelia Jones, Dodds Farm Supply  Roger Keesee, Beef  Shelton Miles, Beef  Betty Mitchell, Bartlett Milling  Lawrence Narehood, Cider Apple Orchard Manager  Matt Neighbors, Landscaping  Roy Neighbors, Bartlett Milling  Brad Phillips, Equipment – John Deere  Chris Phillips, Equipment – John Deere  Brandon Schmidt, Past President Campbell County Cattlemen’s Association  Scott Tweedy, Grain Producer and Campbell County Economic Development Commission  Don Yancey, Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA – Campbell County  Delvin Yoder, Dairy  Lowell Yoder, Dairy

City of Lynchburg  John Abel, Randolph College and Lynchburg Area Food Council  Jason Fowler, Land and Table  Urs Gabathuler, Main Street Eatery  Donald Johns, Conner Produce Co.  Kim Payne, Lynchburg City Manager  Mike Russell, Department of Minority Business Enterprise – Lynchburg Office  Steve Simpson, Lynchburg Health Department, Environmental Health Manager  Meryl Smith, Lynchburg City Schools, Supervisor of School Nutrition

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | iii

Table of Contents

Acknowledgements ...... i How to Use this Plan ...... 1 Guiding Principles ...... 2 Introduction: The Impact ...... 3 Plan on a Page ...... 4 GOAL #1 Coordinate Regional Marketing and Outreach ...... 5 Project 1.1 Develop a regional agriculture and forestry website ...... 5 Project 1.2 Prepare and update regional and local data profiles of the agriculture and forestry industries ...... 8 Project 1.3 Promote locally grown foods working with producers, local governments, community organizations, school districts, and farmers markets ...... 10 Project 1.4 Work with existing convenience stores in the City of Lynchburg to improve access to fresh and healthy produce ...... 13 GOAL #2 Strengthen Resources for Producers ...... 16 Project 2.1 Complete a regional food hub feasibility study ...... 16 Project 2.2 Coordinate with county cattlemen’s associations to discuss direct marketing opportunities within and outside of the region ...... 18 GOAL #3 Promote Career and Small Business Development Opportunities ...... 22 Project 3.1 Convene meetings to connect producers with food service professionals and other larger buyers interested in making local food purchases ...... 22 Project 3.2 Coordinate agriculture and forestry career awareness activities for high school and college students in Region 2000 ...... 25 Project 3.3 Develop a regional young farmers institute to provide ongoing workshops and technical assistance ...... 27 Writing Region 2000’s Agriculture and Forestry Story ...... 29 Appendix A: Immediate Actions ...... 30 Appendix B: Grant Funding Resources Directory ...... 33 Appendix C: Methodology ...... 47 Appendix D: Local Input Sessions ...... 50

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | iv

Appendix E: Summary of Interviews ...... 61 Appendix F: SWOT Analysis ...... 64 Appendix G: Data Snapshots ...... 67 Appendix H: Asset Map Inventory and Digital Asset Map ...... 78

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | v

How to Use this Plan

The intent of the Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy in Virginia’s Region 2000 is to provide the Region 2000 community with a framework for action to promote regional growth in the agriculture and forestry industries. Formed as a collaborative entity linking economic development organizations and Virginia Cooperative Extension (VCE) offices across localities in Virginia’s Region 2000, the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team is charged with driving immediate actions outlined in the plan, tracking metrics to monitor progress, and determining continued actions working with local and regional partners. The plan is structured around a Vision Statement and Guiding Principles that identify the intended overarching results of the plan for Virginia’s Region 2000. Within the plan, three goal areas have been defined:

 Goal #1: Coordinate Regional Marketing and Outreach  Goal #2: Strengthen Resources for Producers  Goal #3: Promote Career and Small Business Development Opportunities

Each goal is broken out into specific projects. The projects include defined actions separated by set time frames: Immediate (

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 1

VISION STATEMENT:

We recognize and promote the

agriculture and forestry industries to strengthen regional economic

development and future sustainability.

Guiding Principles:

 Leaders within economic development and the Virginia Cooperative Extension (VCE) collaborate to leverage resources and engage partners to actively target opportunities for business attraction and expansion.  Elected officials and residents increasingly understand the significance of agriculture and forestry to the regional economy and value the preservation of its heritage.  Locally grown foods are readily accessible and incorporated into local food systems.  Forestry is a viable industry embracing the principles of sustainability and creates jobs in the region.  Value-added agriculture increases profitability on farms, helps retain and attract young producers, and enhances regional identity.

Source: http://www.pubzi.com/paisaje~es~JIwZYwca96D.html

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 2

Introduction: The Impact

Virginia’s Region 2000 Partnership (“Region 2000”) is a network of organizations focused on providing regional leadership in the 2,000 square miles including Amherst County, Appomattox County, Bedford County, Campbell County, and the City of Lynchburg. Areas of focus include economic development, workforce development, technology, and community development. Region 2000’s Local Government Council is specifically tasked with addressing challenges and opportunities on a regional basis that can collectively strengthen localized responses. Region 2000 is fortunate to have a diversified economy with primary industry clusters in wireless technology, manufacturing automation, nuclear energy, plastics, pharmaceuticals, and health care.1 Additionally, the region has a number of colleges and universities which provide employment and attract students from throughout the United States to the region. Through this plan, the Local Government Council has prioritized agriculture and forestry as industries with potential and opportunity to promote economic development. Agriculture has a direct economic impact of over $1.46 billion in Region 2000 with 5,227 jobs. Forestry has an $806.1 million direct economic impact with 2,560 jobs. Direct economic impact consists of the addition of economic activity or expenditure into the region such as sales of agriculture and forestry-related industries in Virginia’s Region 2000. The total impact includes the direct economic impact as well as the indirect and induced impacts. Indirect impacts are dollars re-spent in the region on supplies and services. For example, producers spend a portion of their sales revenue to purchase seeds, fertilizer, utilities and insurance from companies in the region. These companies utilize their sales revenues to purchase supplies and services from other firms which leads to spending through multiple rounds of inter-industry purchases to calculate the indirect impact. The induced impact is based on spending of households. For example, an agriculture business pays wages to it employees. These employees then purchase goods and services from regional firms who then receive a portion of their labor and material inputs. 2 The sum of these purchases is used to calculate the induced impact. AGRICULTURE FORESTRY

DIRECT DIRECT

$1.46 B $806.1 M

5,227 jobs 2,560 jobs

TOTAL TOTAL

$1.81 B $1.05 B 7,997 jobs 4,606 jobs

1 Region 2000 Business Economic Profile: http://www.region2000.org/economic-profile.html 2 Economic Impacts of the Agriculture and Forest Industries in Virginia June 2013: http://www.coopercenter.org/sites/default/files/publications/Virginia%20AgricultureForest%202012reva.pdf

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 3

Plan on a Page

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 4

GOAL #1 Coordinate Regional Marketing and Outreach Project 1.1 Develop a regional agriculture and forestry website

The first priority identified by the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team is to promote awareness of agriculture and forestry industries and associated regional assets available to support continued and future growth. It is a story that has not been effectively told. Currently, the localities in Virginia’s Region 2000 do not have a region-specific website that provides information about the agriculture and forestry industries. The creation of a website will help strengthen awareness about the industries with a centralized source for information. Potential functions of the website include:

 Providing information on educational workshops related to agriculture and forestry offered by the Virginia Cooperative Extension (VCE) and other organizations/agencies.  Listing upcoming United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) grant opportunities and applicable grant opportunities from public and foundation sources.  Incorporating a digital asset map that plots location of producers, technical assistance resources, education and training providers, and other resource suppliers.  Listing of regional producers, types of products available, and seasonal availability.  Promoting agri-tourism and upcoming events.  Offering a message board to post discussion topics and employment opportunities.  Providing links to existing local economic development organizations and VCE Office websites,

Within Virginia’s Region 2000, Bedford County has the Bedford Grown website that can serve as a local model to review and build upon (see link: http://www.bedfordgrown.com/). Bedford Grown is a branding campaign for consumers, retailers, wholesalers, famers markets, and restaurants to promote locally grown produce and goods. The initiative is a collaboration between the Bedford County Office of Economic Development, the Bedford County Agricultural Economic Development Board, and the VCE Bedford County Office.

Note – Defined short-term and long-term actions will be reviewed and revised during an annual planning session of the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team. At this time, lead and partner responsibilities will be assigned. Immediate Actions (< year) 1.1.1 Incorporate the digital asset map into the Responsible: websites of the following organizations: Virginia’s Lead: Virginia’s Region 2000 Region 2000, local economic development Partners: Strategic Plan Coordinating Team organizations, and local VCE websites (see Appendix H for directions).

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 5

Immediate Actions (< year) continued 1.1.2 Review current outreach activities to share Responsible: information on events, workshops, and funding Lead: Local VCE Offices opportunities – share information between local Partners: Strategic Plan Coordinating Team VCE Offices.

Short-Term Actions (1-2 years) 1.1.3 Develop grant application and apply for Virginia Responsible: Department of Agriculture and Consumer Lead: To Be Determined (TBD) Services (VDACS), Virginia Tourism Commission Partners: TBD (VTC), and other applicable grants to fund a regional website focused on agriculture and forestry. 1.1.4 Once funding is received, identify a local partner Responsible: to design website and create regional brand for Lead: TBD agriculture and forestry. Partners: TBD

1.1.5 Gather information from producers, VCE, Responsible: economic development, etc. to populate the Lead: TBD regional website. Partners: TBD

1.1.6 Launch regional website. Responsible: Lead: TBD Partners: TBD

Long-Term Actions (On-going) 1.1.7 Work with local VCE Offices and Economic Responsible: Development Organizations to coordinate Lead: TBD distribution of information and making updates Partners: TBD to the website.

Funding Opportunities

 Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS) Agriculture and Forestry Industries Development (AFID) Fund  Virginia Tourism Corporation (VTC) Marketing Leverage Program  USDA Farmers Market and Local Foods Promotion Program

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 6

Outcome Measures Note – The Strategic Plan Coordinating Team will update and refine the outcome measures each year during the annual planning session based on defined actions and assigned responsibilities.  Number of ag-related events including workshops, training sessions, and presentations  Participation in events (number of attendees – growth/decline)  Number of hits to the regional website

Best Practice | Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission (CSPDC) – Fields of Gold

Fields of Gold is a regional agri-tourism program managed by the CSPDC designed to collectively market and promote the Shenandoah Valley’s agri-tourism sites and activities. The goal is to create a coordinated tourism experience for the traveling public and to brand the region as an agri-tourism destination. Localities in the Fields of Gold region include Augusta County, Bath County, Botetourt County, Highland County, Page County, Rockbridge County, Rockingham County, Shenandoah County, City of Buena Vista, City of Harrisonburg, City of Lexington, City of Staunton, and City of Waynesboro. After completing a regional planning process in 2012-13, funded by the Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD), CSPDC was able to receive significant support and buy-in from member localities for the program. In 2013, they were awarded an AFID grant to develop and market a robust website that will include an interactive map of agri-tourism sites, an events calendar and farm-to-restaurant guide. The marketing and build-out of the website were identified as key deliverables in their strategic marketing plan.

Source:  CSPDC Fields of Gold http://www.cspdc.org/fieldsofgold/fieldsofgold.htm

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 7

Project 1.2 Prepare and update regional and local data profiles of the agriculture and forestry industries

Regional residents see farmlands, grasslands, and forested areas in their communities and on their daily commutes. While agrarian land is part of the landscape, its simple existence does not translate well into demonstrating how it is an integral component of the local and regional economy. Agriculture has a total economic impact of $1.46 billion on Region 2000 with over 5,200 jobs. Forestry has an $806.1 million total economic impact with over 2,560 jobs.3 Region 2000 is home to nearly 3,000 farms, averaging 186 acres in size.4 Economic development leaders and Virginia Cooperative Extension (VCE) agents need clearer profiles of the economic and employment data for the agriculture and forestry industries in order to maximize the effectiveness of outreach efforts and to elevate the importance of these industries in the minds of elected officials and regional residents. The development of local and regional data profiles allows data to be presented in a summary format for use in presentation and incorporation into websites for economic development and agriculture/forestry awareness efforts. To begin these efforts, regional and local data profiles are provided in Appendix G: Data Snapshots. Note – Defined short-term and long-term actions will be reviewed and revised during an annual planning session of the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team. At this time, lead and partner responsibilities will be assigned. Immediate Actions (< year) 1.2.1 Incorporate local data profiles (see Appendix G) Responsible: into existing local economic development Lead: Virginia’s Region 2000 websites, Virginia’s Region 2000 website, and Partners: Strategic Plan Coordinating Team local VCE office websites.

1.2.2 Distribute and present information to local Board Responsible: of Supervisors and Economic Development Lead: Region 2000 Organization Boards. Partners: Strategic Plan Coordinating Team

Long-Term Actions (On-going) 1.2.3 Update data annually to maintain up-to-date Responsible: information. Lead: TBD Partners: TBD

Funding Opportunities

 Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS) Agriculture and Forestry Industries Development (AFID) Fund

3 Economic Impacts of the Agriculture and Forest Industries in Virginia June 2013: http://www.coopercenter.org/sites/default/files/publications/Virginia%20AgricultureForest%202012reva.pdf 4 USDA Census 2012, Table 1: http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_2_County_Level/Virginia/

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 8

 Virginia Tourism Corporation (VTC) Marketing Leverage Program

Outcome Measures Note – The Strategic Plan Coordinating Team will update and refine the outcome measures each year during the annual planning session based on defined actions and assigned responsibilities.  Percentage of local Board of Supervisors that are briefed on agriculture and forestry industry  Website traffic to VCE local websites  Number of requests to economic development organizations for agriculture and forestry data

Best Practice | Jefferson County Agriculture Development Council (NY)

In Upstate New York, the Jefferson County Local Development Corporation worked with the Jefferson County Board of Legislators to form the Jefferson County Agriculture Development Council. The organization focuses on raising awareness about agriculture in the County and has established a website called www.comefarmwithus.com. Through the efforts, the County is accomplishing the following:  Established a Jefferson County agricultural website.  Advertising the quality of our natural and man-made resource and infrastructure base to attract new investment into the County’s agricultural sector.  Identified an agricultural point person to provide leadership and act as a spokesman for agricultural issues in Jefferson County.  Make better use of the news media to inform the public on agricultural issues.  Give agriculture a focus among government, the Jefferson County Local Development Corporation, and other agencies.  Develop new agricultural products and markets for Jefferson County farmers.  Establish a local development corporation for agriculture.  Finding better ways to increase positive media coverage of agriculture in the County.

Source:  Jefferson County Agriculture Development Council www.comefarmwithus.com

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 9

Project 1.3 Promote locally grown foods working with producers, local governments, community organizations, school districts, and farmers markets

Many areas within Region 2000 have begun to embrace the economic opportunities offered by expanding the role of locally grown and marketed food and other agricultural products. There are organized farmers markets in the region’s localities as well as community supported agriculture (CSA) operations. The VCE has estimated that a $1.65 billion annual economic benefit would be realized if each Virginia household would repurpose only $10 of its weekly food expenditure to foods and drinks produced locally. According to the USDA Farm to School Census,5 an estimated 2.6% of all food purchased by public schools in Virginia’s Region 2000 are from local sources, a small percentage that could grow with a better understanding of how to access locally grown foods. Consumers are extremely interested in local food. A 2013 national survey found that 66% of respondents embrace local food options because they believe it helps local economics and 70% were willing to pay more for local food.6 Almost 30% of respondents indicated that they would consider purchasing food elsewhere if their preferred local store did not carry local foods. Better awareness about locally grown products helps consumers understand where they are available and benefits local producers by providing them with access to additional buyers.

Note – Defined short-term and long-term actions will be reviewed and revised during an annual planning session of the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team. At this time, lead and partner responsibilities will be assigned. Immediate Actions (< year) 1.3.1 Hold meetings with producers to raise awareness Responsible: about opportunities to market locally grown Lead: Local VCE Offices products. Partners: Local Economic Development Organizations; Local Ag-Related Organizations

Short-Term Actions (1-2 years) 1.3.2 Reach out directly to school districts to involve in Responsible: the discussion by sharing a listing of available Lead: TBD locally grown foods; coordinate with Project 3.1. Partners: TBD

1.3.3 Explore development of farmers markets, CSAs Responsible: and direct to consumer selling in Virginia’s Lead: TBD Region 2000. Partners: TBD

5 USDA Farm to School Census: http://www.fns.usda.gov/farmtoschool/census#/district/vareports 6 Buying into the Local Food Movement January 2013: http://www.atkearney.com/paper/- /asset_publisher/dVxv4Hz2h8bS/content/buying-into-the-local-food-movement/10192

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 10

Mid-Term Actions (2-4 Years) 1.3.4 Continue seeking grant funding for specific Responsible: initiatives that arise based on continued Lead: TBD monitoring of producer capacity and market Partners: TBD need.

Long-Term Actions (On-going) 1.3.5 Building awareness about local food available to Responsible: consumer and growing opportunities for ag Lead: TBD producers; create collaboration building Partners: TBD events/campaigns.

Funding Opportunities

 USDA Specialty Crop Block Grants  USDA Farm to School Grants  USDA Value-Added Producer Grants  Centra Health Foundation

Outcome Measures Note – The Strategic Plan Coordinating Team will update and refine the outcome measures each year during the annual planning session based on defined actions and assigned responsibilities.  Annual farmers market attendance by locality; year-over-year growth/decrease in farmers markets attendance  Number of new vendors participating in farmers markets by locality  Number of new products offered at farmers markets by locality  Number of calls to Local VCE Offices focused on direct marketing assistance  Attendance at VCE workshops and presentations focused on direct marketing assistance  Annual percentage of local produce, meat, and value-added agriculture purchased through public school systems, colleges and universities in the region

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 11

Best Practice | Sustain Floyd

Created in 2009, SustainFloyd is a 501(c) (3) non-profit organization that assists the community of Floyd County, Virginia in sustainable, local growth. The organization’s vision is a mix of the past and the future. They work to develop new ideas that will support the next generation of their rural community, while preserving local traditions and history. Led by a 13-member board and 3-member staff, they have created a virtual hub (sustainfloyd.org) and coordinated activities related to sustainability in Floyd County (located 40 miles southwest of Roanoke) with a focus on food, the arts, education, and energy. They organize a Farmers Market which starts at the end of May each year. It is equipped to process SNAP benefits (formerly known as food stamps). Certain vendors at the farmers market allow Individuals and families to double the amount of food they purchase with their SNAP benefit. SustainFloyd has formed a Farm to School Working Group in close partnership with Floyd County Schools, county farmers and a series of groups including New River Valley Community Services, Plenty! (a community organization focused on providing access to fresh healthy food in Floyd County), Virginia Cooperative Extension, and the School Health Advisory Board. In Fall 2013, they began delivering potatoes once a month to all five county schools (including the high school), apples twice a month to all five schools and lettuce twice a month to the four elementary schools. In November 2013, the USDA awarded a Farm to School grant to SustainFloyd and the Floyd Farm to School Working Group. The grant will cover the salary of a full-time Farm to School Coordinator to work with local producers, new kitchen equipment for school cafeterias, educational and field trip expenses, and a career & technical program for Floyd County High School’s agriculture class who will use a hydroponic system to grow fresh produce year-round. The goal of the program is to have Floyd County farmers supply a minimum of 20-40% of food served in school cafeterias to generate revenue for farmers and ensure fresh, healthy food for students. Sources:  SustainFloyd http://sustainfloyd.org/  SustainFloyd Farm to School Program http://sustainfloyd.org/agriculture/farm-to-school/

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 12

Project 1.4 Work with existing convenience stores in the City of Lynchburg to improve access to fresh and healthy produce

An estimated 26.4% of City of Lynchburg residents live in food deserts. The USDA defines food deserts as areas where people cannot access affordable and nutritious food. They are usually found in impoverished areas lacking grocery stores, farmers markets, and healthy food providers.7 City residents without reliable personal transportation and those reliant on public transportation do not have easy access to grocery stores. While there are a number of convenience stores located in the City, not all stock fresh produce. One solution is to target existing stores and provide assistance for them to offer local produce in their stores. There are already a number of programs in Lynchburg that are working to address food deserts. Lynchburg Grows is an urban farm with nine greenhouses growing roses and fresh vegetables while providing vocational training for disabled and low-income residents. They operate a Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) program where buying a share allows participants to receive a basket of in-season produce weekly from May through October. The Lynchburg Community Market offers locally produced fruit, vegetables, meat, and cheeses for sale through a Farmers Market held year round every Wednesday and Saturday in Downtown Lynchburg. Select vendors accept benefits from the federally funded Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as the Food Stamp program that provides financial assistance to eligible low-income individuals and families. A targeted initiative offering fresh produce in convenience stores will build upon these activities and provide another avenue to address food deserts and promote healthier eating in Lynchburg.

Note – Defined short-term and long-term actions will be reviewed and revised during an annual planning session of the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team. At this time, lead and partner responsibilities will be assigned. Immediate Actions (< year) 1.4.1 Reengage owners of local convenience stores to Responsible: discuss the concept and interest. Lead: Lynchburg Area Food Council Partners: TBD

1.4.2 Host callout event for the initiative with Responsible: attendance by interested producers, Lead: Lynchburg Area Food Council convenience stores, and supporting Partners: TBD organizations to gather input for designing the program.

Short-Term Actions (1-2 years) 1.4.3 Design program with identified technical Responsible: assistance, application process, and outreach Lead: TBD materials Partners: TBD

7 Food Desert in Virginia. Recommendations from the Food Desert Task Force January 2014: http://agriculture.vsu.edu/special-programs/food-desert-study.php

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 13

1.4.4 Prepare grant application to submit to regional Responsible: foundation(s) and federal agencies for financial Lead: TBD support. Partners: TBD

1.4.5 Submit funding applications to foundations and Responsible: federal agencies for financial support. Lead: TBD Partners: TBD

Mid-Term Actions (2-4 Years) 1.4.6 Launch Healthy Corner Store program with Responsible: convenience stores in Lynchburg. Lead: TBD Partners: TBD

Long-Term Actions (On-going) 1.4.7 Provide ongoing assistance, hold regular Responsible: meetings with convenience store owners. Lead: TBD Partners: TBD

Funding Opportunities

 Centra Health Foundation Community Initiative Fund  Center for Disease Control (CDC) Healthy Communities Program

Outcome Measures Note – The Strategic Plan Coordinating Team will update and refine the outcome measures each year during the annual planning session based on defined actions and assigned responsibilities.  Number of convenience stores participating in the program  Number of local producers providing fresh produce to participating convenience stores  Annual dollar amount of fresh produce purchased at participating convenience stores

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 14

Best Practice | Louisville Healthy in a Hurry Corner Stores (KY)

The YMCA of Greater Louisville, the Louisville Department of Public Health and Wellness, and the Center for Health Equity work collaboratively on Louisville’s Healthy In A Hurry Corner Store initiative. They leveraged CDC grant funding and private donations to provide store owners in two neighborhoods located in “food deserts” with refrigeration, signage, marketing, start-up inventory, and ongoing technical assistance. As a result of this initiative, store owners are able to renovate their facilities to make them more attractive and easier to sell fresh produce. Customers see a Healthy in a Hurry sign displayed on the outside of the convenience store and know fresh fruits and vegetables are available at the store. The initiative has led store owners to hire community members in the neighborhood to assist with produce management. Additionally, relationships have formed between stores and neighborhood schools. Sources:  Healthy Kids Healthy Communities – Healthy Corner Store Case Studies http://www.healthykidshealthycommunities.org/node/675  Healthy in a Hurry Corner Stores – YMCA Louisville http://www.ymcalouisville.org/social- responsibility/social-services/healthy-in-a-hurry-corner-stores.html

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 15

GOAL #2 Strengthen Resources for Producers

Project 2.1 Complete a regional food hub feasibility study

Trends in small farming show regular growth in the number of new farmers. However, most of these new farmers will be operating farms less than 200 acres in size. Further, the trend continues to show that barriers for entry into larger-sized operations are high while more accessible new farming options exist for producers starting small, niched farming ventures. Simultaneously, urban and rural communities are grappling with the issue of food deserts – areas where access to healthy, affordable food is limited by high poverty rates, lack of transportation, and no full-service grocery stores. At the intersection of these two issues comes the concept of a food hub – a facility that manages the aggregation, storage, distribution, and marketing of locally grown foods. An examination of the feasibility of a food hub for Virginia’s Region 2000 will determine if it is a viable enterprise to implement. Note – Defined short-term and long-term actions will be reviewed and revised during an annual planning session of the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team. At this time, lead and partner responsibilities will be assigned. Immediate Actions (< year) 2.1.1 Organize a Food Hub Planning Committee to Responsible: discuss feasibility and design of a food hub Lead: City of Lynchburg VCE Office concept in Virginia’s Region 2000. Partners: Centra Health

Short-Term Actions (1-2 years) 2.1.2 Apply for funding for a food hub feasibility study. Responsible: Lead: TBD Partners: TBD 2.1.3 Receive funding and complete the feasibility Responsible: study of regional food hubs. Lead: TBD Partners: TBD

Mid-Term Actions (2-4 Years) 2.1.4 Begin food hubs, as feasible. This includes Responsible: implementation of models such as online hubs Lead: TBD and pick up/drop off sites. Partners: TBD

2.1.5 Grow awareness and participation in food hubs Responsible: in diverse markets throughout Virginia’s Region Lead: TBD 2000 such as local school systems, within the City Partners: TBD of Lynchburg and rural communities.

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 16

Funding Opportunities

 USDA Value-Added Producer Grants  USDA REAP Grants, B and I Loans  USDA Specialty Crop Block Grants  Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS) Agriculture and Forestry Industries Development (AFID) Fund  The Virginia Tobacco Indemnification and Community Revitalization Commission Competitive Education Grant Program

Outcome Measures Note – The Strategic Plan Coordinating Team will update and refine the outcome measures each year during the annual planning session based on defined actions and assigned responsibilities.  Number of food hubs in Virginia’s Region 2000  Number of pick up/drop off sites for local food distribution to consumers by 2016

Best Practice | Hoosier Harvest Market Feasibility Study

In 2012, a food hub feasibility study was completed for Central Indiana, resulting in the creation of the Hoosier Harvest Market. It was formed as a collaboration between the Purdue Cooperative Extension Service (CES) and a local organization called the Harvest Council in Greenfield, Indiana. The concept of expanding regional marketing opportunities for farmers and offering more choices in locally grown food for consumers was first explored following CES winning a USDA Specialty Crop Block Grant. A business planning process was completed with engagement of an affiliated group of volunteers and members of the existing Harvest Council. From the plan, it was determined that a food hub, the Hoosier Harvest Market, would be organized and be an online marketplace where consumers could order directly from individual producers that participated in the market and then pick up their product weekly at set delivery and pick-up points. In addition to the study and business plan, members of the Hoosier Harvest Market have attended conventions of the National Good Food Network (www.ngfn.org) to continue learning more about formal food hub organization and networking within the industry each year. Sources:  Central Indiana Feasibility Study: http://www.ngfn.org/resources/ngfn-database/knowledge/8- 20-12%20Central%20IN%20Food%20Hub%20Feasibility%20Study.pdf/  Hoosier Harvest Market: www.hoosierharvestmarket.com

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 17

Project 2.2 Coordinate with county cattlemen’s associations to discuss direct marketing opportunities within and outside of the region

Virginia’s Region 2000 encompasses a strong livestock presence with a high concentration of cow/calf and other cattle producers. Across Region 2000, cattle and calf production generated more than $41 million in sales in 2012.8 Cattle production is well suited to the region’s topography and climate providing new opportunities for cattle producers to grow and maintain their operations. The Region currently has access to a small variety of meat processing facilities for various livestock including swine, sheep, cattle, and goats. However, as more producers examine expanding their direct to consumer offerings in meats, the current processing capacity will be strained or potentially inadequate. Further, demand is such that producers need access to processors that better understand their needs and have more available hours to process, age, and package meats than are currently offered. Finally, getting animals to a processor can be a logistical and costly challenge for some livestock producers creating a barrier to expanding operations. The prospect of a mobile slaughterhouse that can provide USDA certified meat is a possible solution to these challenges of cost and accessibility. In 2010, Rural Cooperatives, an official publication of the USDA, released statistical examples of the costs associated with mobile slaughterhouse units. The article noted the following: “Per producer, at a cost of $103 average, 10 head of beef cattle could be processed daily, at $37 each, 40 sheep could be processed and at a cost of $53 each, 24 hogs. This cost is up to 20 to 30 percent less per head than many local 'bricks and mortar' processors.”9

To support the discussion above, actions for this goal include investigating the feasibility of expanding meat processing capability, including mobile processing and the exploration of a meat marketing cooperative. Note – Defined short-term and long-term actions will be reviewed and revised during an annual planning session of the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team. At this time, lead and partner responsibilities will be assigned.

Immediate Actions (< year) 2.2.1 Convene meetings and organizational call-outs to Responsible: involve producers in the process. Lead: Local VCE Offices; County Cattlemen’s Associations Partners: County Farm Bureaus

2.2.2 Create simple survey and poll (by county) Responsible: livestock producers and existing processors to Lead: Local VCE Offices Partners: County Cattlemen’s Associations

8 USDA Census 2012, Table 1: http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_2_County_Level/Virginia/ 9 Thompson, Steven. “Going Mobile.” Rural Cooperatives November/December 2010: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/supportdocuments/CoopMag-nov10.pdf

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 18

gauge interest in increasing capacity/ convenience of species-specific meat processing.

Short-Term Actions (1-2 years) 2.2.3 Apply for grant funding to conduct a feasibility Responsible: study for meat processing expansion and/or Lead: TBD meat cooperative development. Partners: TBD

2.2.4 Business planning and organizing of producer Responsible: groups and individual farmers for branding and Lead: TBD awareness building about locally raised meats. Partners: TBD

Mid-Term Actions (2-4 Years) 2.2.5 To help expand locations where locally raised Responsible: meats are sold, find/curate an ‘on the ground Lead: TBD team’ to devise promotions, raise awareness and Partners: TBD build messaging.

2.2.6 Facilitate formation of a regional-raised meats Responsible: brand and marketing materials. Lead: TBD Partners: TBD

2.2.7 Implement possible construction of new sites Responsible: and/or updates to existing facilities per study Lead: TBD results of the study. Partners: TBD

Long-Term Actions (On-going) 2.2.8 Continually seek additional funding options for Responsible: expansion and building awareness. Lead: TBD Partners: TBD

2.2.9 Work to encourage ongoing adoption of new Responsible: strategies, attend industry-wide events to remain Lead: TBD current in other marketing trends in livestock Partners: TBD production and marketing.

Funding Opportunities

 USDA Value-Added Producers Grants  USDA Rural Energy for America Program (REAP Grants)  USDA Business and Industry (B and I) Loans

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 19

 USDA Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) Grants  USDA Sustainable Ag Research and Education Grants (SARE)  USDA Rural Business Enterprise  Rural Business Opportunity Grants  USDA Rural Utilities service grants such as REDLG (Rural Economic Development Loans and Grants)  USDA Cooperative Market Development Grants  Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS) Agriculture and Forestry Industries Development (AFID) Fund  The Virginia Tobacco Indemnification and Community Revitalization Commission Competitive Education Grant Program

Outcome Measures Note – The Strategic Plan Coordinating Team will update and refine the outcome measures each year during the annual planning session based on defined actions and assigned responsibilities.  Annual number of new producers raising meats for retail sale  At least one or more county-based groups are coordinated specifically around new direct marketing options for meat producers by year end 2015  Funding for a feasibility study or business plan is applied for and obtained by end of 2015  Business plans and structures are explored and a new marketing opportunity emerges by end of 2016  Region 2000 becomes an example of a best practice for expanded meat marketing opportunities for farmers, including new and young producers

Best Practice | Shenandoah Valley Beef Cooperative (VA)

The farming partners of the Shenandoah Valley Beef Cooperative are committed to providing customers with beef that is locally raised, environmentally friendly, and humanely produced, The cooperative consists of twelve farmers located primarily in Virginia’s Rockingham County. Collectively, the group markets about 25 head of cattle per month into local markets. They use a common brand and marketing approach to provide their beef to wholesalers and retailers in the Shenandoah Valley and greater Washington D.C. area. Due to their efforts at building a distribution network, a number of Virginia and Washington, D.C.-area restaurants feature their beef. Source:  Shenandoah Valley Beef Cooperative http://www.shenandoahvalleybeefcoop.com/

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 20

Best Practice | Island Grown Farmers Cooperative (WA)

Island Grown Farmers Cooperative (IGFC) provides a USDA- inspected mobile animal slaughter service to members and non- members in San Juan, Whatcom, Skagit, Island, and Snohomish counties in Washington State. The facility is also WSDA/USDA Certified Organic. Other services include a small retail outlet open on Fridays and Saturdays where many co-op members sell their product. Additionally, at a facility in Bow, Washington, IGFC provides services for cutting and wrapping, fresh and frozen storage, and some retail sales. IGFC specializes in grass fed beef, pork, lamb, and goat. The organization is structured as a member-owned producer cooperative and it is led by an elected board from the membership. Currently the co-op has a closed membership of approximately 42 farms. The co-op employs a general manager and small project team that oversees the operations of the organization. Sources:  Island Grown Farmers Cooperative – A Little History http://www.igfcmeats.com/  Local Harvest Profile – Island Grown Farmers Cooperative http://www.localharvest.org/island- grown-farmers-cooperative-M33263

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 21

GOAL #3 Promote Career and Small Business Development Opportunities

Project 3.1 Convene meetings to connect producers with food service professionals and other larger buyers interested in making local food purchases

Discussions in local input sessions and one-on-one interviews indicated interest from large institutional buyers to have a better mechanism in place to learn about locally grown products, understand what they purchase, the quantity available, and when it can be delivered or picked up. Currently, some local school systems are making local produce purchases. According to the USDA Farm to School Census, Amherst County Public Schools spent 5% of their food budget on local purchases of products including apples, sweet potatoes, romaine lettuce, and spinach that were grown locally.10 Centra Health maintains an on-site vegetable garden and estimates two-thirds of their produce purchases from June through August are made through local producers. A coordinated approach to connect these larger buyers with local producers is not available at a regional scale. Local VCE offices – along with the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team provide an entity that can coordinate initial regional discussions between producers and buyers to determine effective tools and activities to increase purchases of locally grown products. As an example, a regional farm tour for food services professionals and other institutional buyers could be developed to improve knowledge of available products and boost sales for regional producers.

Immediate Actions (< year) 3.1.1 Coordinate meetings with school system food Responsible: services professionals, producers, large buyers Lead: Local VCE Offices and other organizations to discuss ways to increase purchases of locally grown products.

10 USDA Farm to School Census – Amherst County Public Schools (VA) Responses http://www.fns.usda.gov/farmtoschool/census#/district/va/5100210

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 22

Short-Term Actions (1-2 years) 3.1.2 Determine priority activities and prepare Responsible: proposal to apply for grant funding from various Lead: TBD sources (e.g. USDA Farm to School program Partners: TBD planning grant, Centra Health Foundation, Virginia Farm Bureau, etc.).

3.1.3 Investigate the concept of a Regional Farm Tour; Responsible: work with producers to gather their buy-in and Lead: TBD create parameters for each on-site visit. Partners: TBD

Long-Term Actions (On-going) 3.1.4 Offer an annual calendar of events linking buyers Responsible: and producers. Lead: TBD Partners: TBD

3.1.5 Work to increase participation from other large Responsible: purchasers including nursing homes, colleges, Lead: TBD universities, and restaurants. Partners: TBD

Funding Opportunities

 USDA Farm to School Grants  USDA Beginning Farmers and Ranchers Development Program  USDA DLT Grants  Centra Health Foundation  Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS) Agriculture and Forestry Industries Development (AFID) Fund  The Virginia Tobacco Indemnification and Community Revitalization Commission Competitive Education Grant Program

Outcome Measures Note – The Strategic Plan Coordinating Team will update and refine the outcome measures each year during the annual planning session based on defined actions and assigned responsibilities.  Percentage of school district food purchased locally  Number of producers hosting food services professionals/institutional buyers

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 23

Best Practice | VDACS Taking Root Farm Tours (VA)

From May through June 2013, farms and agribusinesses throughout Virginia opened their operations to teachers and food service professionals. Tours provided them an opportunity to learn about Virginia grown products, production practices and the opportunity to source more fresh Virginia Grown Products on school menus. The motivation for setting up the Taking Roots Farm Tours was a 2010 statewide assessment of the Virginia Farm to School program completed by Virginia Tech. It surveyed local school nutrition directors and found that 75% of respondents were interested in connecting with local farmers. Focused directly on school district nutrition directors, the Taking Root Farm Tours allowed participants a chance to tour farms and distribution centers throughout the Commonwealth. A total of 20 school districts registered for the tours. Additionally, representatives from area/regional hospitals, community health and wellness organizations and Virginia Cooperative Extension participated in the tours. Sites visited included Johnson’s Orchard in Bedford, Pickett’s Harbor Farm in Cape Charles, Public House Produce in Luray, Windmill Produce Farm in Powhatan, Cullipher Farm Market in Virginia Beach, Homestead Creamery in Wirtz, Arcadia Center for Sustainable Food and Agriculture in Alexandria, Agriberry in Studley, and the Local Food Hub in Charlottesville. Sources:  VDACS Taking Root Farm Tour http://www.vdacs.virginia.gov/marketing/farm-tours.shtml  Farm Tour Visits Creamery http://www.lancasterfarming.com/Farm-Tour-Visits-Creamery-

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 24

Project 3.2 Coordinate agriculture and forestry career awareness activities for high school and college students in Region 2000

A collaborative approach for career awareness in agriculture and forestry can strengthen knowledge of the industries and encourage high school and college students to pursue education and training programs to prepare themselves for future job opportunities. There is interest between producers and educators (K-12 and postsecondary) to provide students work-based learning experiences in agriculture and forestry. Currently, there is not a dedicated regional resource available to connect students and producers/employers. Through the creation of a regional website about the agriculture and forestry industries in Project 1.1, the functionality exists for employers and producers to post work-based learning opportunities such as internships and student co-op positions as well as interest in hosting student field trips and participating in classroom and on-campus presentations. High school and college students can apply for work-based learning opportunities. Educators can promote the resource to their students and work to incorporate producers and employers into their coursework to promote regional agriculture and forestry career opportunities.

Note – Defined short-term and long-term actions will be reviewed and revised during an annual planning session of the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team. At this time, lead and partner responsibilities will be assigned. Immediate Actions (< year) 3.2.1 Facilitate meetings with regional school systems Responsible: and colleges and universities located in Virginia’s Lead: Local VCE Offices Region 2000 to discuss ways to strengthen Partners: Local Economic Development agriculture and forestry career awareness Organizations activities.

3.2.2 Determine interest from employers and Responsible: producers to provide student internships, host Lead: Local VCE Offices field trips, and participate in classroom Partners: Local Economic Development presentations. Organizations

Short-Term Actions (1-2 years) 3.2.3 Incorporate web-based capability to post work- Responsible: based learning opportunities into the new Lead: TBD regional agriculture and forestry website (see Partners: TBD Project 1.1).

Long-Term Actions (On-going) 3.2.4 Maintain list of work-based learning Responsible: opportunities each year; actively work to expand Lead: TBD producer, employer and student participation in Partners: TBD

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 25

agriculture and forestry career awareness activities.

Funding Opportunities

 USDA Farm to School Grants  USDA Beginning Farmers and Ranchers Development Program  USDA DLT Grants  The Virginia Tobacco Indemnification and Community Revitalization Commission Competitive Education Grant Program  American Farm Bureau Foundation for Agriculture White-Reinhardt Mini-Grants

Outcome Measures Note – The Strategic Plan Coordinating Team will update and refine the outcome measures each year during the annual planning session based on defined actions and assigned responsibilities.  Program launched by Fall 2016  Number of students participating in internship programs  Number of producers/employers offering internship programs  Percentage of interns who become full-time employees  Percentage of interns who pursue/participate in ag/forestry related career opportunities

Best Practice | Virginia Cooperative Extension (VCE) Internship Program

Virginia Cooperative Extension internships give students the opportunity to explore careers in nutrition, agriculture, environmental science, natural resources, family and consumer sciences, or community and youth development. Summer-long internships are available for college credit. Students get a firsthand view of careers in Extension and do community-changing work with agents who are Virginia Tech faculty members. Examples include helping a family and consumer science agent teach parents how to build a safer environment for their children, showing students how to avoid chronic diseases with healthy food with the help of a 4-H agent, or helping community leaders set up and run a farmers market.

Source:  http://www.ext.vt.edu/internship/

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 26

Project 3.3 Develop a regional young farmers institute to provide ongoing workshops and technical assistance

Agriculture is struggling with an aging population. According to the United States Department of Agriculture 2012 Ag Census, only 6% of famers were under the age of 35. The average farmer was 58.3 years old, 1.2% higher than in 2007, continuing a 30-year trend of steady increase. Providing assistance to those younger farmers starting out and/or taking over family operations is important to ensure that agriculture as a career continues with the next generation of regional residents. There are efforts underway to organize and provide support. The Bedford County Farm Bureau has a 27 member Young Farmers Committee that meets monthly to discuss ways to provide leadership and promote agriculture to young people. A coordinated regional approach that brings together young farmers throughout Virginia’s Region 2000 can assist with providing workshops and technical assistance. This approach can connect with activities through 4-H and FFA to promote agriculture to K-12 students.

Note – Defined short-term and long-term actions will be reviewed and revised during an annual planning session of the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team. At this time, lead and partner responsibilities will be assigned. Immediate Actions (< year) 3.3.1 Work with existing ag-related organizations, ag- Responsible: lending organizations, and county farm bureaus Lead: Local VCE Offices to determine interest in a regional young farmers Partners: Local Economic Development institute. Organizations

3.3.2 Coordinate with state and local VA Farm Bureau Responsible: Staff and ag-lending organizations to provide Lead: Local VCE Offices information on local young farmer production Partners: Local Economic Development and financial educational programs for area Organizations producers; create a regional young farmers institute for Virginia’s Region 2000.

Short-Term Actions (1-2 years) 3.3.3 Develop one-day program workshop for region Responsible: to provide to young farmers; determine topics Lead: TBD based on inputs from producers. Partners: TBD

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 27

Mid-Term Actions (2-4 Years) 3.3.4 Evaluate one-day program workshop and Responsible: determine which courses to continue to offer Lead: TBD and applicable new courses to offer in Partners: TBD subsequent years.

Long-Term Actions (On-going) 3.3.5 Market available workshops and programs to Responsible: young farmers including those involved in Lead: TBD traditional agriculture and non-traditional Partners: TBD agriculture practices; work with local 4-H and high school FFA programs to connect with youth interested in agriculture.

Funding Opportunities

Outcome Measures  Number of young farmers in the region ages 18-35  Percentage growth of young farmers in the region  Number of events held targeting young farmers

Best Practice | Farm Credit – Young Farmers Institute (VA)

Virginia Farm Credit sponsors the annual Young Farmer Institute, a full day class on the economics of farm transitioning. The 2014 Institute was held on February 14, 2014 in Goochland at Virginia Farm Bureau Headquarters. Additionally, Virginia Farm Credit offers a six-month agribusiness course with cost reimbursed if the participant completes all of the assignments. By the end of the course, they have a business plan for running their farm. Source:  Farm Credit - Young, Beginning and Small Farmers http://www.colonialfarmcredit.com/ybs- farmers.html

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 28

Writing Region 2000’s Agriculture and Forestry Story

"The care of the Earth is our most ancient and most worthy, and after all our most pleasing responsibility. To cherish what remains of it and to foster its renewal is our only hope." ~Wendell Berry, poet and farmer In agriculture there abounds a storied past with deep cultural roots that reaches into the very soul of both today's farming public and the notions that consumers have about food and fiber. Yet, too, we live at the very intersection between what's modern and the need for progress and a real interest in doing things in a simpler way. We have pressures in agriculture and forestry from development that threatens to take and remake agricultural land and yet there is a real need to forge growth and new opportunities to keep the industry attractive to the young and the innovative of all ages. This strategic planning process has knowingly begun to tackle this very relevant issue of our age and has asked the questions about:  What is the status of agriculture and forestry today?  Who are the key players in our Region and what do they need and want?  What are the opportunities for leverage and where do we make those simple connections?  What are the big new ideas we have to implement and who should lead that charge?

The goals and accompanying projects identified in the plan can and should shift as the lead agencies identified for each action item implement immediate actions and when the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team determines continued actions in their annual planning sessions. To move the goals outlined in the plan forward, it will be important to evaluate, assign, and measure three key components:  Engagement – the opportunity to invite the right people to the table and keep them involved to leverage time and resources.  Excellence – the harnessing of the desire to grow the agriculture and forestry industries.  Extension – the ability to perpetuate this project and its aims into many facets of other regional plans and goals and for a generation or more. It is recommended that Virginia’s Region 2000 take the lead in hosting an annual planning session of the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team. The purpose of the planning session will be to conduct an annual review of completed actions and to set priority actions and responsibilities for the next year. More than a discussion, the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team will consider the following questions:  What is working? Denote specific actions that occurred and why they had impact.  What best practices were implemented during the previous year that now serve as the ‘new normal’ for the Region?  What challenges are still present and how does the Team prioritize addressing those challenges in the coming year?  Who are the best partners to aid in moving the identified annual goals forward and how does the Team engage them?

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 29

Appendix A: Immediate Actions

Goal #1: Coordinate Regional Marketing and Outreach

Project 1.1 Develop a regional agriculture and forestry website

Immediate Actions (< year) 1.1.1 Incorporate the digital asset map into the Responsible: websites of the following organizations: Virginia’s Lead: Virginia’s Region 2000 Region 2000, local economic development Partners: Strategic Plan Coordinating Team organizations, and local VCE websites (see Appendix H for directions).

1.1.2 Review current outreach activities to share Responsible: information on events, workshops, and funding Lead: Local VCE Offices opportunities – share information between local Partners: Strategic Plan Coordinating Team VCE Offices.

Project 1.2 Prepare and update regional and local data profiles of the agriculture and forestry industries

Immediate Actions (< year) 1.2.1 Incorporate local data profiles (see Appendix G) Responsible: into existing local economic development Lead: Virginia’s Region 2000 websites, Virginia’s Region 2000 website, and Partners: Strategic Plan Coordinating Team local VCE Office websites.

1.2.2 Distribute and present information to local Board Responsible: of Supervisors and Economic Development Lead: Region 2000 Organization Boards. Partners: Strategic Plan Coordinating Team

Project 1.3 Promote locally grown foods working with producers, local governments, community organizations, school districts, and farmers markets

Immediate Actions (< year) 1.3.1 Hold meetings with producers to raise awareness Responsible: about opportunities to market locally grown Lead: Local VCE Offices products. Partners: Local Economic Development Organizations; Local Ag-Related Organizations

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 30

Project 1.4 Work with existing convenience stores in the City of Lynchburg to improve access to fresh and healthy produce

Immediate Actions (< year) 1.4.1 Reengage owners of local convenience stores to Responsible: discuss the concept and interest. Lead: Lynchburg Area Food Council Partners: TBD

Goal #2: Strengthen Resources for Producers

Project 2.1 Complete a regional food hub feasibility study

Immediate Actions (< year) 2.1.1 Organize a Food Hub Planning Committee to Responsible: discuss feasibility and design of a food hub Lead: City of Lynchburg VCE Office concept in Virginia’s Region 2000. Partners: Centra Health

Project 2.2 Coordinate with county cattlemen’s associations to discuss direct marketing opportunities within and outside of the region Immediate Actions (< year) 2.2.1 Convene meetings and organizational call-outs to Responsible: involve producers in process. Lead: Local VCE Offices; County Cattlemen’s Associations Partners: County Farm Bureaus

2.2.2 Create simple survey and poll (by county) Responsible: livestock producers and existing processors to Lead: Local VCE Offices gauge interest in increasing Partners: County capacity/convenience of species-specific meat Cattlemen’s Associations processing.

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 31

Goal #3: Promote Career and Small Business Development Opportunities

Project 3.1 Convene meetings to connect producers with food service professionals and other larger buyers interested in making local food purchases

Project 3.2 Coordinate agriculture and forestry career awareness activities for high school and college students in Region 2000

Immediate Actions (< year) 3.2.1 Facilitate meetings with regional school systems Responsible: and colleges and universities located in Virginia’s Lead: Local VCE Offices Region 2000 to discuss ways to strengthen Partners: Local Economic Development agriculture and forestry career awareness Organizations activities.

Project 3.3 Develop a regional young farmers institute to provide ongoing workshops and technical assistance

Immediate Actions (< year) 3.3.1 Work with existing ag-related organizations, ag- Responsible: lending organizations, and county farm bureaus Lead: Local VCE Offices to determine interest in a regional young farmers Partners: Local Economic Development institute. Organizations

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 32

Appendix B: Grant Funding Resources Directory

Below is a short funding resources directory listing possible opportunities that exist for funding the projects outlined in the balance of the strategic plan. This list is not exhaustive and while several opportunities have immediate spring/summer 2014 open dates and deadlines, this list should not be construed as a complete eligibility evaluation nor as a guarantee of funding. It should, however, be looked at as a solid option for exploring the dollars that exist within the marketplace for funding the projects recommended. FEDERAL FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES

USDA Value Added Producer Grant

Synopsis: The Value-Added Producer Grant Program (VAPG) is a competitive grants program administered by the Rural Business Cooperative Service of USDA to help producers expand markets for, and increase their profitability through value-added agricultural enterprises. The program makes small and mid-size family farmers and ranchers, as well as beginners, a priority for funding by giving those applicants extra points in the ranking process. Eligible applicants for the VAPG, include independent farmers or ranchers, farmer owned cooperatives and producer groups. Comments: This may be a good source of funding to support and expand farmers markets. Due Date: Estimated due date is February 2015. Max Grant Request: $200,000 for Working Capital grants, and $75,000 for Business Planning grants. Match Required: $1 to $1. Eligible Applicants: Independent Producer, Agricultural Producer Group, Farmer or Rancher Cooperative, or Majority-Controlled Producer-Based Business Venture. Your proposed value-added product must also fall within one of the five product categories:

 Commodity Processing  Market Differentiation or non-standard production method  Commodity Segregation  On-Farm Renewable Energy  Local Food

Website: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/BCP_VAPG.html

USDA REAP (Rural Energy for America Program)

Synopsis: The REAP grant provides assistance to entities that will assist agriculture producers and small rural businesses by conducting energy audits and providing information on renewable energy development assistance.

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 33

Comments: This grant would be a good fit for small business owners who are interested in energy efficiency upgrades or renewable energy projects. Due Date: The due date for 2014 is July 7. Max Grant Request: The minimum Renewable Energy System Grant request is $2,500 up to a maximum of 25% of eligible project costs or $500,000, whichever is less. The maximum amount for an energy audit- renewable energy development assistance grant is $100,000. Match Required: REAP grants provide 25% of eligible project costs. Eligible Applicants: State, tribal, local government or their instrumentalities, land grant colleges, universities and other institutions of higher learning, rural electric cooperatives and public power. Website: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/BCP_ReapEaReda.html

USDA Rural Business Opportunities Grant (RBOG)

Synopsis: To provide technical assistance for business development and conduct economic development planning in rural areas (less than 50,000 population). Comments: This grant would be beneficial for overall rural economic development planning projects including brownfield development efforts. Due Date: TBD Max Grant Request: $100,000 Match Required: None Eligible Applicants: Public bodies, nonprofit corporations, Indian tribes, institutions of higher education, and rural cooperatives are eligible to apply. Website: http://www.urdev.usda.gov/BCP_RBOG.html

USDA Rural Business Enterprise Grants (RBEG)

Synopsis: The RBEG program provides grants for rural projects that finance and facilitate development of small and emerging rural businesses help fund distance learning networks, and help fund employment related adult education programs. To assist with business development, RBEGs may fund a broad array of activities. Comments: This grant would be beneficial for small businesses. Due Date: TBD Max Grant Request: There is no maximum level of grant funding. However, smaller projects are given higher priority. Generally grants range $10,000 up to $500,000.

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 34

Eligible Applicants: Rural public entities (towns, communities, State agencies, and authorities), Indian tribes and rural private non-profit corporations are eligible to apply for funding. At least 51 percent of the outstanding interest in any project must have membership or be owned by U.S. citizens or resident aliens. Website: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/BCP_rbeg.html

USDA Distance Learning and Telemedicine Grants (DLT)

Synopsis: The Distance Learning and Telemedicine Loan and Grant Program (DLT) is designed specifically to meet the educational and health care needs of rural America. Through loans, grants and loan/grant combinations, advanced telecommunications technologies provide enhanced learning and health care opportunities for rural residents. Comments: This grant would help with adult education and for medical outreach programs to very rural locations. Due Date: Typically summer or early fall of each year Max Grant Request: $50,000 to $500,000 Match Required: 15% Eligible Applicants: Entities providing education and medical care via telecommunications including corporations or partnerships, Indian tribes or tribal organizations, state or local units of government, consortia, and private for-profit or not-for profit corporations. Website: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/UTP_DLT.html

USDA Business and Industry (B&I) Loans

Synopsis: The purpose of the B&I Guaranteed Loan Program is to improve, develop, or finance business, industry, and employment and improve the economic and environmental climate in rural communities. This purpose is achieved by bolstering the existing private credit structure through the guarantee of quality loans that will provide lasting community benefits. It is not intended that the guarantee authority will be used for marginal or substandard loans or for relief of lenders having such loans. Comments: Loan, not a grant. This loan may be a good option to augment grant funding. Max Grant Request: The total amount of Agency loans to one borrower must not exceed $10 million. The Administrator may, at the Administrator discretion, grant an exception to the $10 million limit for loans of $25 million under certain circumstances. The Secretary may approve guaranteed loans in excess of $25 million, up to $40 million, for rural cooperative organizations that process value-added agricultural commodities. Match Required: Sliding scale

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 35

Eligible Applicants: A borrower may be a cooperative organization, corporation, partnership, or other legal entity organized and operated on a profit or nonprofit basis; an Indian tribe on a Federal or State reservation or other federally recognized tribal group; a public body; or an individual. Website: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/bcp_gar.html

USDA Farmers Market Promotion Program (FMPP)

Synopsis: The goals of FMPP grants are to increase domestic consumption of, and access to, locally and regionally produced agricultural products, and to develop new market opportunities for farm and ranch operations serving local markets by developing, improving, expanding, and providing outreach, training, and technical assistance to, or assisting in the development, improvement, and expansion of, domestic farmers markets, roadside stands, community-supported agriculture programs, agri-tourism activities, and other direct producer-to-consumer market opportunities. Comments: Eligible projects might include, but are not limited to:  Farmer training and education  Farmer organization and networking  Advertising, outreach for the market, agri-tourism  Market startup, operating, infrastructure  Product introduction or improvement, value added, branding  Market analysis and planning, customer and producer surveys  Vendor and customer recruitment, new venue establishment

Due Date: June 20, 2014 Max Grant Request: The maximum amount awarded for any one proposal cannot exceed $100,000; the minimum award is $15,000. Match Required: No match is required. Eligible Applicants: Agricultural Businesses; Agricultural Cooperatives; Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) Networks; CSA Associations; Economic Development Corporations; Local Governments; Nonprofit Corporations; Producer Networks; Producer Associations; Public Benefit Corporations; Regional Famers Market Authorities

Website: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/fmpp

USDA Farm to School Grant Program

Synopsis: The purpose of the USDA Farm to School Grant Program is to assist eligible entities in implementing farm to school programs that improve access to local foods in eligible schools. On an annual basis, USDA awards up to $5 million in competitive grants for training, supporting operations, planning,

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 36 purchasing equipment, developing school gardens, developing partnerships, and implementing farm to school programs.

Comments: In the last funding round, USDA solicited applications for four types of grants:

 Planning grants intended for school districts or schools just starting to incorporate farm to school program elements into their operations.  Implementation grants intended for school districts or schools to help scale or further develop existing farm to school initiatives.  Support Service grants intended for state and local agencies, agricultural producers or groups of agricultural producers, and non-profit entities working with school districts or schools to further develop existing farm to school initiatives and to provide broad reaching support services to farm to school initiatives.  Conference/Event grants are intended to support conferences, events and trainings that strengthen farm to school supply chains, or conferences, events and trainings that provide technical assistance in the area of local procurement, food safety, culinary education and integration of agriculture‐ based curriculum.

Due Date: Last deadline was April 30, 2014 Max Grant Request: $100,000 Match Required: A 25% cash or in-kind match of the total project cost is required. Eligible Applicants: Eligible schools are considered K-12 school food authorities (SFAs) that participate in the National School Lunch or Breakfast Programs; State and local agencies; Agricultural producers or groups of agricultural producers; and non-profit entities. Website: http://www.fns.usda.gov/farmtoschool/fy-2015-farm-school-grant-program-funds-available

USDA Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Grants (AFRI)

Synopsis: The Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) at the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) supports research, education, and extension grants that focus on key national and regional problems of sustaining all components of agriculture, including farm efficiency and profitability, ranching, renewable energy, forestry (both urban and agroforestry), aquaculture, rural communities and entrepreneurship, nutrition, food safety, biotechnology, and conventional breeding. AFRI aims to advance science in support of agriculture and coordinate opportunities to build on these discoveries which will allow people to make informed practical decisions. Comments: The Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) encompasses several different Request for Applications (RFA) that contain many Program Areas. These Program Areas cover a broad array of issues and topics important to U.S. agriculture. Examples include:  Childhood Obesity Prevention Challenge Area  Food Safety Challenge Area

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 37

 Food Security Challenge Area  Water for Agriculture Challenge Area

Due Dates: See link: http://www.nifa.usda.gov/funding/afri/afri_program_deadline_dates.html Max Grant Request: Varies by program area (see link: http://www.nifa.usda.gov/funding/rfas/afri.html) Match Required: Varies by program area (see link: http://www.nifa.usda.gov/funding/rfas/afri.html) Eligible Applicants: Varies by program area (see link: http://www.nifa.usda.gov/funding/rfas/afri.html) Website: http://www.nifa.usda.gov/funding/afri/afri_synopsis.html

USDA Rural Utilities service grants such as REDLG (Rural Economic Development Loans and Grants)

Synopsis: The Rural Economic Development Loan and Grant (REDLG) program provides funding to local businesses in rural areas through local utility organizations. The USDA offers zero interest loans to local utilities as Intermediaries. They, in turn, pass through to local businesses (Ultimate Recipients) for projects that will create and retain employment in rural areas. The ultimate recipients directly pay back the Intermediary, which is responsible for repayment to the USDA. Grants operate through a similar process, except payback from Intermediaries is not required. Comments: REDLG grantees and borrowers pass the funding on to eligible projects. Examples of eligible projects include: Capitalization of revolving loan funds

 Technical assistance in conjunction with projects funded under a zero interest loan  Business Incubators  Community Development Assistance to non-profits and public bodies (particularly job creation or enhancement)  Facilities and equipment for education and training for rural residents to facilitate economic development  Facilities and equipment for medical care to rural residents  Telecommunications/computer networks for distance learning or long distance medical care

Due Dates: See link for further details (http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/BCP_redlg.html) Max Grant Request: During FY 2014, approximately $91 million is available for loans and $10 million for grants. Match Required: See link for further details (http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/BCP_redlg.html)

Eligible Applicants: To receive funding under the REDLG program (which will be forwarded to selected eligible projects) an entity must:

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 38

 Have borrowed and repaid or pre-paid an insured, direct, or guaranteed loan received under the Rural Electrification Act or,  Be a not-for-profit utility that is eligible to receive assistance from the Rural Development Electric or Telecommunication Program  Be a current Rural Development Electric or Telecommunication Programs Borrower

Website: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/BCP_redlg.html

USDA Cooperative Program Grants and Assistance

Synopsis: Cooperative Program Grants aim to promote understanding and use of the cooperative form of business as a feasible organizational option for marketing and distributing agricultural products. A range of grants are available, including Value Added Producer Grants (VAPG), Rural Business Opportunity Grants (RBOG), Small Socially Disadvantaged Producer Grants, and Rural Cooperative Development Grants. Comments:  Value-Added Producer Grants (VAPG) Grants may be used for planning activities and for working capital for marketing value-added agricultural products and for farm-based renewable energy.  Rural Business Opportunity Grants (RBOG) promotes sustainable economic development in rural communities with exceptional needs through provision of training and technical assistance for business development, entrepreneurs, and economic development officials and to assist with economic development planning.  Small Socially-Disadvantaged Producer Grant (SSDPG) The purpose of this section is to assist in the development of new and emerging technologies for the development of advanced biofuels.  Rural Cooperative Development Grant Program (RCDG) are made for establishing and operating centers for cooperative development for the primary purpose of improving the economic condition of rural areas through the development of new cooperatives and improving operations of existing cooperatives.

Due Dates: Varies by program (see link: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/cphome.html) Max Grant Request: Varies by program (see link: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/cphome.html) Match Required: Varies by program (see link: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/cphome.html) Eligible Applicants: Varies by program (see link: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/cphome.html) Website: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/cphome.html

USDA Beginning Farmers and Ranchers Development Program

Synopsis: The Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development Program (BFRDP) was authorized in the 2008 Food, Conservation, and Energy Act (Pub .L. No. 110-234, Section 7410,) amending Section 7405 of the previous Farm Bill, and amended in section 7409 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (Pub. L. No. 113-333).

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 39

Approximately $19.2 million will be available to support training, education, outreach, and technical assistance initiatives for beginning farmers or ranchers in fiscal year 2014. There will be three types of projects: (a) Standard Projects: to new and established local and regional training, education, outreach and technical assistance initiatives that address the needs of beginning farmers and ranchers in selected areas; and (b) Educational Enhancement Projects: To help develop seamless beginning farmer and rancher education programs by conducting evaluation, coordination and enhancement activities for Standard Projects and other non-funded beginning farmer programs; and (c) Curriculum and training clearinghouse, to make educational curricula and training materials available to beginning farmers and ranchers and organizations who serve them. Comments: Topics for programs and services, as listed in the Agricultural Act of 2014, include:

 basic livestock, forest management, and crop farming practices;  innovative farm, ranch, and private, nonindustrial forest land transfer strategies;  entrepreneurship and business training;  financial and risk management training (including the acquisition and management of agricultural credit);  natural resource management and planning;  diversification and marketing strategies;  curriculum development;  mentoring, apprenticeships, and internships;  resources and referral;  farm financial benchmarking;  assisting beginning farmers or ranchers in acquiring land from retiring farmers and ranchers;  agricultural rehabilitation and vocational training for veterans;  farm safety and awareness; and  other similar subject areas of use to beginning farmers or ranchers.

Due Date: June each year Max Grant Request: See link (http://www.nifa.usda.gov/fo/beginningfarmersandranchers.cfm) Match Required: At least 25 percent Eligible Applicants: Collaborative, State, tribal, local, or regionally-based network or partnership of public or private entities, which may include state cooperative extension service, community-based and nongovernmental organizations; college or university, or any other appropriate partner. Website: http://www.nifa.usda.gov/fo/beginningfarmersandranchers.cfm

Sustainable Ag Research and Education (SARE) Grants

Synopsis: SARE works to advance innovations that improve profitability, stewardship, and quality of life in the agricultural sector by funding groundbreaking research and education. The North Central (Midwest)

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 40 region of SARE has grant opportunities for Farmer Rancher, Research and Education, Professional Development, Graduate Students, and Youth Educators. Comments: North Central Region SARE administers several grant programs, each with specific priorities, audiences and timelines. The focus for all of NCR-SARE grant programs is on research and education. Funding considerations are made based on how well the applicant articulates the nature of the research and education components of their sustainable agriculture grant proposals. NCR-SARE's Grant Programs include:

 Farmer Rancher  Research and Education  Professional Development Program  Graduate Student  Youth Educator

Due Dates: Varies by program (see link: http://www.northcentralsare.org/Grants/Our-Grant-Programs) Max Grant Request: Varies by program (see link: http://www.northcentralsare.org/Grants/Our-Grant- Programs) Match Required: Varies by program (see link: http://www.northcentralsare.org/Grants/Our-Grant- Programs) Eligible Applicants: Varies by program (see link: http://www.northcentralsare.org/Grants/Our-Grant- Programs) Website: http://www.northcentralsare.org/Grants/Our-Grant-Programs

State Department of Agriculture Specialty Crop Block Grant

Synopsis: The purpose of the Specialty Crop Block Grant Program (SCBGP) is to solely enhance the competitiveness of specialty crops. Specialty crops are defined as “fruits, vegetables, tree nuts, dried fruits, horticulture, and nursery crops (including floriculture).” Comments: This grant could help support and enhance farmers markets or develop food hubs. It is federal funding administered through the state. Due Date: May each year Max Grant Request: $70,000 Eligible Applicants: The agency, commission, or department responsible for agriculture within any of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands is eligible to apply directly to the U.S. Department of Agriculture for grant funds. Website: http://www.vdacs.virginia.gov/marketing/scrop.shtml

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 41

Center for Disease Control (CDC) Healthy Communities Program

Synopsis: The CDC administers the Healthy Communities Program that works with communities through local, state, and national partnerships to improve community leaders and partners skills and commitments for establishing, advancing, and maintaining effective population-based strategies that reduce the burden of chronic disease and achieve health equity. Communities create momentum that assists people in making healthy choices where they live, learn, work, and play through sustainable changes that address the major risk factors—tobacco, physical inactivity, and unhealthy eating. Currently, 331 communities and 52 state and territorial health departments have been funded. Comments: Funding for healthy communities program was cut in the most recent federal budget. Check back to determine what funding programs are available in 2015. Due Date: Grant application cycles are announced annually. Check website for update (see link below). Max Grant Request: TBD Match Required: TBD Eligible Applicants: Eligible applicants include local and state governments Website: http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dch/programs/healthycommunitiesprogram/

VIRGINIA FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES

Centra Foundation – Community Initiative Fund

Synopsis: A specific purpose fund established and funded by Centra and administered by the Centra Foundation. This fund supports community health-related projects and programs on a pro-active basis. Grant proposals submitted for funding from the Centra Community Health Initiative Fund will be received by the Centra Foundation to be reviewed by its grants committee. To receive consideration, proposals should be submitted by March 1. Comments: The Centra Foundation emphasizes health-related programs so projects would need to link to healthy eating and healthy lifestyles. Due Date: March 1st and September 1st each year Max Grant Request: Average grants range from $5,000 - $25,000 Match Required: No match required Eligible Applicants: 501c3 non-profit organizations serving Central and Southside Virginia Website: http://foundation.centrahealth.com/about-us/community-health-initiative-fund

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 42

Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS) Governor’s Agriculture and Forestry Industries Development Fund (AFID)

Synopsis: AFID grants are now available for political subdivisions of the Commonwealth interested in growing their agriculture and forestry industries by strategically targeting for assistance those businesses that add value to Virginia grown agriculture and forestall products. AFID grants are made at the discretion of the Governor with the expectation that grants awarded to a political subdivision will result in a new or expanded processing/value-added facility for Virginia grown agricultural or forestall products. The amount of an AFID grant and the terms under which it is given, are determined by the Secretary of Agriculture and Forestry and approved by the Governor. An AFID grant is awarded to a political subdivision for the benefit of the company, with the expectation that the grant will be critical to the success of the project. Businesses interested in AFID should first contact their local economic development professional, or other appropriate representative of the political subdivision, to discuss the qualifying project. If the political subdivision is interested in applying for the grant and providing the required local match, they should contact the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services to discuss the application process. Factors used by the Secretary of Agriculture and Forestry in determining grant awards and conditions include: anticipated levels of job creation, capital investment, amount of Virginia-grown agricultural and forestall products used by the project, as well as projected impact on agricultural and forestall producers, a return on investment analysis, and an analysis of the impact on competing businesses located in the area. Comments: Grants are made upon an application by both the local government and the business beneficiary for a project under the following conditions:

 The business beneficiary is a facility that produces "Value-added agricultural or forestall products,"  A minimum of 30% of the agricultural or forestry products to which the facility is adding value are produced within the Commonwealth of Virginia on an annual basis in normal production years  The grant request does not exceed $250,000 or 25% of qualified capital expenditures (whichever is less)  The applicant provides a dollar-for-dollar matching financial commitment (cash or qualified in-kind)  A performance agreement is executed between the applicant and the company to ensure fulfillment of promised job creation, capital investment and purchase of Virginia grown agricultural or forestry products  Public announcement of the project is coordinated with the Governor’s Office

Due Date: Rolling Max Grant Request: $250,000 or 25% of qualified capital expenditures (whichever is less) Match Required: Dollar-for-dollar matching financial commitment (cash or qualified in-kind) Eligible Applicants: Political subdivisions in Virginia and business beneficiary for a project Website: http://www.vdacs.virginia.gov/agribusiness/afid.shtml

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 43

Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS) Planning Grants for the Governor’s Agriculture and Forestry Industries Development Fund (AFID)

Synopsis: AFID Planning Grants give local governments the flexibility to undertake the kind of planning, study, or local initiative they think best to grow and support agriculture and forestry-based businesses in their community and region. The planning grant program also provides a greater voice in local economic development to agriculture and forestry stakeholders by requiring that any grant funded program be implemented by a board, committee or working group representing agriculture and/or forestry interests in the affected local area. The competitive grant program allows political subdivisions to apply for up to $20,000 in matching funds, or up to $35,000 for multi-jurisdictional applications, to undertake efforts that support local agriculture and forestry-based businesses. These efforts might include developing a strategic plan for agriculture and forestry economic development, creating new local policies and zoning ordinances that better support these industries, or funding feasibility studies and predevelopment work for new facilities that bring significant and lasting benefits to the local agriculture and forestry sectors. The amount of an AFID Planning Grant and the terms under which it is given are determined by the Secretary of Agriculture and Forestry and approved by the Governor. Factors used in determining grant awards and conditions include the project’s expected impact on the affected local area’s agriculture and forestry related industries, and the extent to which the effort will improve local capacity to support these industries’ development beyond the life of the grant. Comments: Examples of projects include:

 Develop a strategic plan for agriculture and/or forestry economic development  Develop local policies and ordinances that better support agriculture and/or forestry based business, agri-tourism, and other rural enterprises  Create new plans, policies or programs that will lead to the preservation of working lands  Fund feasibility studies, business plans and other predevelopment work for projects that will have a significant and lasting positive impact on the local agriculture and/or forestry sector  Develop and/or implement local initiatives supporting agriculture and/or forestry based businesses, such as those promoting agri-tourism, local food systems, biomass heat, addressing food deserts, etc.  Other projects that advance the interests of agriculture and/or forestry in the local area

Due Date: Rolling Max Grant Request: $20,000 for single political subdivision, $35,000 for multi=jurisdictional applications Match Required: Dollar-for-dollar matching financial commitment (up to 50% can be qualified in-kind) Eligible Applicants: Political subdivisions in Virginia Website: http://www.vdacs.virginia.gov/agribusiness/afid.shtml

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 44

Virginia Tourism Corporation (VTC) Marketing Leverage Program

Synopsis: The Virginia Tourism Corporation (VTC) Marketing Leverage Program is designed to stimulate new tourism marketing programs through the creation of tourism partnerships and to extend the “Virginia is for Lovers” campaign. The objective of this program is to leverage limited marketing dollars, resulting in increased visitor spending. A minimum of three entities must partner financially to apply for funding consideration. Partners may consist of Virginia towns, cities, counties, convention and visitors bureaus, chambers of commerce, other local or regional destination marketing organizations (DMO), private businesses, museums, attractions, cultural events, and other not-for-profit entities. Comments: Focus is on tourism so would align with activities related to agri-tourism. Due Date: TBD Max Grant Request: There are two levels of funding in the VTC Marketing Leverage Program: Tier One Leverage Program Up to $10,000 Maximum award of $10,000; Tier Two Leverage Program $10,001 to $50,000 Minimum of $10,001 up to a maximum of $50,000 Match Required: Tier One Leverage Program: 1:1 match required Tier Two Leverage Program: 2:1 match required (two dollars from partners matched by one dollar from VTC). Eligible Applicants: A minimum of three entities must partner financially to apply for funding consideration. Partners may consist of Virginia towns, cities, counties, convention and visitors bureaus, chambers of commerce, other local or regional destination marketing organizations (DMO), private businesses, museums, attractions, cultural events, and other not-for-profit entities. Website: https://www.vatc.org/PAM/leverageprog/

Virginia Tobacco Indemnification and Revitalization Commission

Synopsis: The Commission achieves its statutory charge through its indemnification program and seven grant programs that are intended to accomplish the economic revitalization and diversification of Virginia’s tobacco-growing region. Program of funding include:

 Economic Development Program - building regional economic development capacity to diversify the economic base through creation or improvement of sites, buildings and utility infrastructure, workforce training facilities, tourism infrastructure etc. Two economic development committees exist, one for each region (note that Southside Economic Development funds are distributed under a formula that allocates the funds based on tobacco employment, warehousing and quota in each local area).  Special Projects - implement projects that are innovative in nature and regional in their impacts

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 45

 Education - prepare citizens for new-economy employment through GED and workforce development, higher education scholarship programs for the two regions and competitive grants to community colleges and other educational entities.  Agribusiness - encourage regional efforts that reduce dependency on tobacco and provide value- added crops, livestock, products, facilities, etc.  Tobacco Region Opportunity Fund (TROF) - provides performance-based monetary grants to tobacco region localities to assist in the creation of new jobs and investments, whether through new business attraction or existing business expansion.

Comments: Only applicants from Appomattox, Bedford, and Campbell counties are eligible to receive funding. Due Date: Grant application cycles are announced annually. Check website for updates. Max Grant Request: Up to $1,000,000 depending on the project Match Required: Document matching funds in application Eligible Applicants: Eligible applicants include local governments, economic development organizations, and IRS-designated nonprofits (funds that will ultimately benefit a private entity must have a public purpose and flow through a public or nonprofit grantee, based upon terms of a performance-based agreement). Website: http://www.tic.virginia.gov/competivegrantprog.shtml

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 46

Appendix C: Methodology

Thomas P. Miller and Associates (TPMA), an Indianapolis, Indiana consulting firm, in collaboration with Prosperity Ag & Energy Resources, collectively “the Consulting Team,” was selected to facilitate a strategic planning process with the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team. Specific goals of the project include:

 Develop and define an approach to promote and strengthen the region’s agriculture and forestry economy;  Develop a framework for a regional agriculture vision that will garner widespread support from agricultural and forestry stakeholders, property owners, policymakers, and business leaders;  Prioritize rural economic development strategies with focus on agriculture and forestry.

The components of the strategic planning process are displayed below.

SWOT Analysis/ Quantitative Asset Map Local Input One-on-One Final Strategic Planning Data Analysis Inventory sessions Interviews Plan Session

For each component, the Consulting Team completed the following activities. Quantitative Data Analysis – review of quantitative data to understand the agriculture and forestry industries and its economic impact. The Consulting Team reviewed data from the 2012 USDA Ag Census and the June 2013 report titled the Economic Impacts of the Agriculture and Forest Industries in Virginia prepared by the University of Virginia’s Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service. Asset Map Inventory and Digital Asset Map – identification of regional and local resources available to support agriculture and forestry operations. Each summary profile included background on operations and/or services, contact information for key staff, and website links for additional information. It is structured around the following categories:  Agriculture Agencies and Organizations  Youth Education  Higher Education  Economic Development  Farm Bureau  Forestry Agencies and Organizations  Region 2000 Companies o Feed and Supply Dealers o Equipment Dealers o Forestry and Wood Products

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 47

o Livestock Markets/Meat Processing o Animal Health o Food Processing o Fuel o Milling o Wholesale o Utilities

A print version of the Asset Map Inventory is included as Appendix H in the Strategic Plan. A Digital Asset Map was developed using the Google Maps platform and can be accessed here: https://mapsengine.google.com/map/embed?mid=zg0ss2ELI-90.kiFR8LIV_TMw. Local Input Sessions – gathering information from key stakeholders in each local area of Region 2000 (Amherst County, Appomattox County, Bedford County, Campbell County, and the City of Lynchburg). The Consulting Team worked with the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team to promote and schedule the input sessions. A standard agenda was utilized (see below) and summary notes were prepared for all of the input sessions (see Appendix D). 1. Welcome/Introductions 2. Overview of Planning Process o Background on Project and Approach o County and Regional Data Snapshot 3. Discussion Questions o What are Bedford County’s and the Region’s unique agriculture and forestry assets? . How are they being leveraged successfully now? . How should leverage of these assets be improved? o What barriers to growth are agriculture and forestry concerns facing? . Primary: broad-based barriers . Secondary: specific/situational barriers o What support is available today and what are the gaps in assistance? o What should be priority action items in Bedford County? For regional collaboration? 4. Conclude and Adjourn o Summary of Discussion o Next Steps

One-on-One Interviews – scheduled with regional and state leaders to gather input for the strategic plan. The Consulting Team conducted the interviews using guiding questions (see below). A summary of key findings from the interviews is included as Appendix E. 1. Provide background on your company/organization (e.g. size of operations, products, initiatives, etc.) and current activities in Region 2000. 2. How would you describe the agriculture/forestry economy in Region 2000? What are its assets and strengths? 3. What are the key constraints and/or challenges facing the agriculture/forestry economy in Region 2000? 4. What activities/initiatives would help the region to improve and strengthen its agriculture/forestry economy?

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 48

5. What regional activities/initiatives would help your business/organization better achieve its outcomes? 6. How could activities/initiatives be organized to encourage engagement of your company/organization and other partners? 7. Would you have interest in staying engaged with a regional effort focused on agriculture/forestry? 8. Any other comments?

SWOT Analysis/Planning Session – prepare SWOT Analysis based on findings and conduct a strategic planning session with the Grant Management Team. The Consulting Team prepared a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) Analysis utilized findings from the launch meeting with the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team, local input sessions, and one-on-one interviews to prepare a draft of the SWOT Analysis. It was during a planning session held in Lynchburg on February 19, 2014. The Consulting Team incorporated additions and changes into the SWOT Analysis based on feedback provided during the planning session. The SWOT Analysis is included in the plan as Appendix F. Final Strategic Plan – The Consulting Team facilitated three review sessions with the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team to 1) review plan framework captured in a Plan on a Page, 2) review first full draft of the plan, and 3) review final draft of the plan. The final plan is framed by a vision statement and guiding principles. The plan includes three goal areas. Each goal area includes projects with defined actions. Immediate actions have an identified lead entity and partners to support implementation activities. Under each project, information is available on funding sources, outcome measures, and case studies for reference.

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 49

Appendix D: Local Input Sessions

The purpose of these Input Sessions was to gather input from local stakeholders for a Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy in Virginia’s Region 2000. As one component of the strategic planning process, this information was combined with insights gathered from each local area, as well as one-on-one interviews and desktop research to create a final plan with goals and actions to strengthen the local economy. Attendees of the sessions were asked a series of questions aimed at identifying the County and Region’s assets, barriers, opportunities, resources needed, and priorities for action.

Amherst County Input Session

January 23, 2014, 9:00am to 11:00am Attendees  Scott Barnes, Morris Orchard  Robert M. Curd, Clover Hill Farm  Donna Meeks, Sweet Briar College  Henry S. Myers, The Canebrakes Farm  Frank Walton, Buffalo River Ranch  Len Thompson, Vineyards  Bill Tucker, Tucker Family Farms  Facilitators – Sarah Aubrey, Prosperity Ag and Energy Resources, Kristen Barry, Thomas P. Miller and Associates, and Jonathan Faris, Thomas P. Miller and Associates  Philipp Gabathuler, Virginia’s Region 2000 Local Government Council

Assets

 Agri-tourism – good environment for drawing individuals to the area o Direct marketing, sell experiences as well as products right on the farm o Lots of vineyards and wineries in the area o Natural beauty – “viewscapes” o Fruits and orchards (soil here is good for these crops) o Garlic Festival (25,000 people) o Apple festival o Sorghum festival o Need to market these things collectively  Soil and slope/topography good for a variety of crops o And for cattle: northern and eastern portions of county are good for growing grass . No dairies  Board of Supervisors support the ag industry with Land Use Taxation o This has historically been an asset – have had a long string of having an advocate on the board

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 50

 Grassroots farmers markets and other orgs  Smaller farms – could be a barrier and an asset o Provide opportunities for more collaboration so there can be sharing of resources

Leveraging Assets  Agri-tourism – Build on things that are already successful o Model after some of the things going on in Bedford County  2/3 of county is zoned for agriculture, support of board to maintain that is essential o 18% of county is in national forest – contributes to natural beauty/tourism o Southern part of county is more residential, less focus on/understanding of agriculture o Could use more zoning assets – sliding scale zoning  VA Extension works with NRCS/USDA – good collaboration now o Look at programs/education on increasing farm income o How to make farming profitable?  Maintaining natural beauty – real estate value  Need to do more promoting youth involvement o Farm tours o Need more producers involved in these activities o 4H/FFA growth – not as much of a presence in county anymore  Leverage knowledge at local education institutions o Sweet Briar College has specialists and experts o VA Tech experts in vineyards and grape growing  Need to maintain Extension presence – cuts to agents in the county and area were proposed in 2009

Major Barriers to Growth  High entry costs and getting access to this capital o No farm credit in the county  Youth involvement in agriculture has decreased; need to get more kids educated on ag o Less 4H/FFA, youth showing in the county o Education in schools is not geared toward agriculture and agriculture careers o Need to get kids out to the farms o Summer opportunities to work in agriculture – don’t underestimate the power of experience  Need to focus on attitude surrounding agriculture o Producers themselves need to focus on being positive in the way they talk about farming, especially to kids  Urban-oriented legislators that are not pro-ag and might even be anti-ag o Negativity surrounding agriculture (us vs. them for ag and non-ag communities)  Former tourism staff position in the county was eliminated – could be helpful to add it back  County boundaries and region boundaries do not necessarily follow the ‘community’ boundaries – difficult when the community seems disconnected from where their resources are o Farming is in north end of Amherst, but some of the regional resources are on the southern end of the region

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 51

 How can farming be profitable? Hard to see this, so it is a barrier to entry  Producers see that there is enough demand for some resources to locate in Amherst County or in the Amherst/Nelson area o Is there a way to look at their data or combine data from different regions to show that this community has a lot of opportunities? . Ex: crop spraying, has to come from far away – don’t see it as being worth it to make the trip to spray 1 farm when they can stay local and do 6  Don’t have Tobacco Commission money like the surrounding counties o Other sources of funding? How do we find out about them

Priorities

 Education on how to make farming profitable  Support for entrepreneurship activities in agriculture  Agritourism growth and diversity of options  Education to youth about agriculture  Maintain land use incentives for farming  Support and encourage a community that fosters agriculture in many segments, including local government, non-ag industry, service providers (such as feed, other input suppliers, insurance, banking), and the linkages between these types of organizations and business

Appomattox County Input Session

January 21, 2014, 9:30am to 11:30am Attendees

 Ron Coleman, Coleman & Sons  W.A. Coleman, Coleman & Sons  Matt English, Appomattox County High School  Kenneth Goin, Livestock  Jack Goin, Livestock  John O. Harrison, Wildwood Farm  Danny Hix, Hix Brothers Farm  Fred H. Jones, Fred H. Jones Well Company  Mary Lund, Lund Angus Farm  Larry Majerus, Beef  Nelson Mann, Crops  Cynthia Spiggle  Dennis Torrence, TRF Auctions  Cecil Wooldridge, Crops  Facilitators – Sarah Aubrey, Prosperity Ag and Energy Resources, Kristen Barry, Thomas P. Miller and Associates, and Jonathan Faris, Thomas P. Miller and Associates  Philipp Gabathuler, Virginia’s Region 2000 Local Government Council  Bob White, Virginia’s Region 2000 Local Government Council

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 52

Assets

 Cattlemen’s Association o Networks for activities o Monthly/quarterly meetings – have access to feed dealers, mineral dealers, vets, minerals  FFA is a very big program in Appomattox, nationally recognized o Have an alumni owned approximately 25 acre working farm adjacent to the school facility with capacity to raise sheep, goats, hogs, cattle and small scale poultry. This property also has approximately three acres utilized for forestry education.  Livestock market for cattle is especially strong o Secondary market for sheep and goats o Mentioned markets in Emporia and Pamplin o Also mentioned Buckingham Online Auction  Virginia Cooperative Extension  Robert E. Lee Soil & Water Conservation district o Provides education o State support for fertilizer  Regional colleges o Sweet Briar College, Randolph College, Liberty University  Tractor Supply store & Southern States coop  Have a new lime plant located within Appomattox County  VA Quality Assurance program

Leveraging Assets

 There are a lot of opportunities to leverage, other than through Extension there is not much happening  Need to improve distribution of information and knowledge of those assets  Could have regular meetings to share this information for those who don’t have internet access

Major Barriers to Growth

 Broadband – not everyone has internet access or reliable internet access, information still needs to be available in hard copy  Forestry land use taxation – much needed to take pressure off land owners to bear county taxes  No real manufacturing or other industry left in the county besides agriculture  Seen as a bedroom community for Lynchburg or Farmville, not as much for an industrial area  Traffic out of the region for jobs since forestry mills left the area  Major barrier is cash flow for new farming operations  Huge for young people getting into farming  Makes farming a part-time job (or not primary income) for many farmers, widely regarded as a lifestyle choice, not a career  Credit – need good credit to get credit  Awareness – forestry is an asset than many landowners have, but they do not see the value or how to take advantage of it  Not a good way now locally to utilize timber assets  Need education

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 53

 New grain handling facility is coming to the area, but there is a high cost of entry into growing specialty grains (like chickpeas) because of specialty equipment and other materials/systems

Priorities  Group formation in many facets and niches in the ag industry to help direct market the many products to unique/relevant markets, such as hay to universities and sheep/goats to ethnic populations  Possible ag board to meet a couple of times a year and discuss these options and to create networking opportunities  Local branding programs such as Buy Fresh/Buy Local o Already exists, but does not include many Appomattox producers  New attempts at starting local markets (like farmers markets) in the area  Support for niche marketing  Marketing for products  Broadband access  Establish networks for niche products  Evaluation of land use taxation policy  Possible on-site local auction/market

Bedford County Input Session

February 19, 2014, 6:30pm to 8:30pm Attendees

 Craig Coker, Bedford County Economic Development Authority  Jerry Craig, Bedford County Planning Commission  Rodney Dellis, Farm Credit  Sam Gardner, Farm Bureau Young Farmers  John Hicks, Bedford-Augusta Co-op  Danny Johnson, Johnson’s Orchard  W.P. Johnson, Bedford Agricultural Economic Development Advisory Board, Farm Bureau Young Farmers  Todd Kready, Forestry  Dorothy McIntyre, Forest Farmers Market  Lucy Overstreet, Idlewild Farm  Jeff Powers, Bedford Agricultural Economic Development Advisory Board  Mark Reeter, Bedford County Administrator  Barbara Rezzonico, Bedford School System  Steve Wilkerson, Bedford County Board of Supervisors  Sam Williams, Bedford Southern State  Facilitators – Tom Miller, Thomas P. Miller and Associates, and Jonathan Faris, Thomas P. Miller and Associates  Philipp Gabathuler, Virginia’s Region 2000 Local Government Council

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 54

Assets

 Size of Bedford County – 5th largest county by land in the Commonwealth of Virginia  Water resources – lakes, rivers that aren’t polluted  Farming Heritage – historical connections, agriculture in largest industry in the County  Cattle Operations – top five county in Virginia, largest in Region 2000  Farmers Markets – active market in Forest; also markets in Bedford and Moneta  Central location – between Roanoke and Lynchburg  Equine Industry – number of operations located in the County  Abundance of grassland in the County  Strong personnel with agriculture support agencies (i.e. Virginia Cooperative Extension)  100% wood burning biomass plant located in a neighboring county  New London Community Cannery – operated by Bedford County Parks and Recreation Department  Agri-tourism – Orchards, Christmas tree farms, pick-your-own farms, vineyards/wineries (e.g. Bedford Wine Trail)  Claytor Nature Study Center – part of Lynchburg College provides education activities for K-12 students and research opportunities for college students  Peaks of Otter – hiking trails and recreational opportunities  Farm Bureau – active with a young farmers group and women’s group  Bedford County Agricultural Economic Development Advisory Board – 12-member board dedicated to supporting agriculture in the County; directly report to the Board of Supervisors

Leveraging Assets  County Extension Service – offer services, research available to support farmers; well connected with the local agriculture community  Agricultural Economic Development Advisory Board – great resource to represent and present on behalf of the County’s producers to the Board of Supervisors on ag-related issues; provide collective voice to identify recommendations and/or policy changes to strengthen the County economy  Bedford Grown – branding effort for products grown in Bedford County, has online presence  Local buys – have co-ops selling product locally, keeping money in Bedford County  Youth programing – active programs in 4-H and FFA (e.g. Liberty High School) but opportunity to expand and grow local activities  Farm Tour – annual event targeting the non-farm public – tour farm and provide understanding of the value of agriculture  Young Farmers Group – meets regularly, has guest speakers, discuss ways to better support efforts and agriculture operations in Bedford County  Peaks of Otter Soil and Water Conservation District – access to resources for projects, technical assistance available to producers  Tourism Department – actively promotes agri-tourism activities in the County

Major Barriers to Growth  Continued local support for agriculture – challenges with government restrictions (e.g. setbacks, limits impeding poultry operations)

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 55

 Infrastructure to handle processing – industrial facilities to process/package meat (e.g. meat processing co-op) are lacking; with large concentration of cattle operations and other proteins (e.g. goats, sheep, etc.), this is currently a gap in the County  Producers – challenging to purchase land with increased prices due to growth of real estate/development market  Farm operations – looking at the market value and need to promote growth of output by operation  Generational farms with traditional mindset – changing mentality to run like a business and strengthen operations  Involvement of more producers in education and technical assistance programs – have great resources available through the Cooperative Extension but same producers attending/utilizing  Awareness about Forestry programs – have seen a lot of turnover with staff members and start of local group of partners but not much follow through/activities  Better collaboration of amongst agriculture and forestry agencies/organizations – infrastructure is there but need to bring together more regularly

Priorities

 Diversify the Agriculture Economy o Investigate the feasibility of a meat processing facility o Greater capability to provide USDA Inspections in the County and Region o Discuss opportunities and potential financial benefits of poultry operations  Connect traditional and non-traditional/conventional farmers – ways to better understand each other and opportunities for collaboration moving forward  Broadband access – challenging for obtaining information and participating in direct marketing opportunities; explore ways to address working with phone/cable providers  Transitional/Succession Planning – providing information and technical assistance to family members who inherit or will inherit a family farm  Explore potential for an event center for agriculture-related events  Consistent land use planning across localities – helps with determining where operations should go or should not go in the region

Campbell County Input Session

January 22, 2014, 4:00pm to 6:00pm Attendees  Paul Anctil, Vineyard & Winery (Campbell County)  Walter Bass, Jr., Sod  W B Bass. III, Sod  Bryan Bennett, President Campbell County Farm Bureau  James Bennett, Beef  Kevin Dawson, Virginia Dept. of Forestry – Campbell County  Carter Elliott, Dairy  Charles Fariss, Beef

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 56

 Frank Goff, Goats and Small Ruminants  Mark Gregory, Beef  Mark Guthrie, Aquaculture - Prawns  Charles Hogue, Beef  H. B. Hunter, Goat Dairy, President of Campbell County Leadership Extension Council  Clint Jones, High School Ag Teacher  George Jones, President Campbell County Cattlemen’s Association  Shelia Jones, Dodds Farm Supply  Roger Keesee, Beef  Shelton Miles, Beef  Betty Mitchell, Bartlett Milling  Lawrence Narehood, Cider Apple Orchard Manager  Matt Neighbors, Landscaping  Roy Neighbors, Bartlett Milling  Brad Phillips, Equipment – John Deere  Chris Phillips, Equipment – John Deere  Brandon Schmidt, Past President Campbell County Cattlemen’s Association  Scott Tweedy, Grain Producer AND Campbell County Economic Development Commission  Don Yancey, Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA – Campbell County  Delvin Yoder, Dairy  Lowell Yoder, Dairy  Facilitators – Sarah Aubrey, Prosperity Ag and Energy Resources, Kristen Barry, Thomas P. Miller and Associates, and Jonathan Faris, Thomas P. Miller and Associates  Philipp Gabathuler, Virginia’s Region 2000 Local Government Council

Assets

 There are several direct to consumer opportunities in the surrounding markets o Retail in Lynchburg o Farmers markets  High quality auction market  Cattlemen’s Association is a great resource for networking and communication  Farm Bureau  Transportation – major east/west highways run through the county  The County Board of Supervisors is supportive of agriculture o Land Use Taxation

Leveraging Assets

 Need more collaboration to be able to find buyers o Example: It is difficult to get buyers to come to the livestock auction because the volume they need isn’t available . Could be opportunities to advertise combining product with other producers . This is a by-product of having smaller farms – need to collaborate to overcome  Tele-auction – there is a lack of understanding on what to do o Could use education on this to get others interested and to know how it works

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 57

 Need to continue to support FFA and 4H o This is a big part of getting people to want to be in agriculture  Need more direct marketing – get consumers out to the farms

Barriers  For most farmers, farming is a part-time job (or provides less than 50% of income) o Don’t always have the time or resources to put more into the farm when there needs to be another job to make a living  Capital-intensive – there are higher costs to entry, preventing new producers from entering the market  Credit is difficult to obtain for start-ups; too much risk involved  Difficult to get youth involved o Too much money unless they inherit an operation o There has been downturn in agricultural programs, some schools have consolidated programming which has hurt FFA o Career in agriculture isn’t portrayed as a positive career path  People don’t understand agriculture o Need to get more people out to visit the farms o Need to show positive images of agriculture; the responsibility of farmers, as well, to project a positive image o Another barrier is that bringing people to the farms requires insurance that some don’t have  Need education on conservation easements

Priorities

 Promotion of the opportunities that are available  Collaboration to communicate this and create a brand o Would require protocols that participants would have to follow o Include both part-time and full-time farmers  Marketing program o What is available in the region and what is imported o Add PR mind to agriculture – what are the markets, where can they sell, how can producers sell directly to consumers or restaurants  Provide information on how to acquire biosolids  Staffing – sustainability coordinator  Education o Consumers – starting at a young age, get them positive about agriculture even if they aren’t going to become a farmer o Producers – alternative financing options  Conservation easements  Local listings of producers and the products they make to offer direct to consumers  Network or forum or coop that would facilitate marketing and sales

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 58

 Opportunities to provide jobs in marketing to younger people – get people involved in agriculture without being farmers

City of Lynchburg Input Session

January 22, 2014, 10:00am to 12:00pm Attendees

 John Abel, Randolph College and Lynchburg Area Food Council  Jason Fowler, Land and Table  Urs Gabathuler, Main Street Eatery  Donald Johns, Conner Produce Co.  Mike Russell, Department of Minority Business Enterprise – Lynchburg Office  Steve Simpson, Lynchburg Health Department, Environmental Health Manager  Meryl Smith, Lynchburg City Schools, Supervisor of School Nutrition  Facilitators – Sarah Aubrey, Prosperity Ag and Energy Resources, Kristen Barry, Thomas P. Miller and Associates, and Jonathan Faris, Thomas P. Miller and Associates  Philipp Gabathuler, Virginia’s Region 2000 Local Government Council  Bob White, Virginia’s Region 2000 Local Government Council

Assets  Presence of a local food movement and the enthusiasm of young leaders to be involved and support the growth of this movement o Farmers Market operates year-round and is the 3rd oldest in the nation o Many local artisan producers o Emerging movement of a brewery and wine trail o Community gardens o An emphasis on urban agriculture; the first Urban Agriculture Summit will be held in April of 2014  Wealth of knowledge and education represented in the five colleges of the region, four of which are in Lynchburg o These institutions also promote agriculture and/or sustainability programs  High quality environment for agriculture with good soil and water resources  Investment is happening and is available, from both public and private sources o Processing facilities are available in the region and show commitment; for example, one paper mill just got a $45 million upgrade o New funding streams and incentives are becoming available at all levels of government – local, state, and federal

Opportunities to Leverage Assets  Collaboration has proven to be successful in launching several new programs, and can be extended to create more linkages

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 59

o Health Department Double Bucks program has incentivized farmers to accept SNAP payments at markets o New bus route from an identified food desert to a grocery store – free for low income residents o More communication can break down silos that exist across the food movement in Lynchburg  There are many charitable organizations in Lynchburg that are a big part of the movement, examples include churches, Daily Bread, Salvation Army, Society of St. Andrew o They are able to have an impact, but there is room for more organizations like them – they need more partners to be able to take advantage of all the resources that are offered to them  Residents often do have access to food, but it is not always healthy food  Education is needed in many areas to improve programs and utilization of programs o Food drives are happening, but it is not always specified what is needed or what can make a difference o Some classes on food and nutrition exist, but transportation and cost can be issues  Connection points need to be made so buyers can connect directly with producers o Education on procurement rules for public organizations o Lists of what buyers are looking for, and what producers can provide

Barriers to Growth  Access to high quality, healthy food  Personal and consumer apathy about health  Producer apathy or lack of knowledge on how to do outreach and how to network to connect directly to consumer markets  Silos – lack of communication between organizations doing similar or connecting things

Priorities

 Marketing – overall, promoting the different aspects of the food movement so that connections can be made o Sourcing products o Networking o Existing systems and programs o Education o Financial Assistance  Growing the local food economy – take advantage of the opportunities that are available with an urban agriculture setting o Use brownfields and empty lots o Farm to freezer opportunities o Community kitchens and Food ventures  Need buy-in from local governments – work on zoning and ordinances in the City that support possible farming and food production/distribution options in the City  Education on sustainability – it is not understood culturally  USDA inspection of food products

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 60

Appendix E: Summary of Interviews

One-on-one interviews were conducted to gather inputs from regional and state-level organization leaders to inform the Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy in Virginia’s Region 2000. A summary of key findings is provided below.

Interviewees  Greg Farmer, President, Colonial Farm Credit  Dr. Jewel Hairston, Dean, College of Agriculture, Virginia State University  Dr. Alan Grant, Dean, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia Tech University  Jimmy Jones, Georgia Pacific  Kim Payne, Lynchburg City Manager  Paige Pratt, Virginia Tech Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences  Wren Roberts, Centra Health Systems  Andy Seibel, Virginia FFA Association  Jeff Wilkerson, Westover Dairy (The Kroger Company)

Assets and Strengths of Agriculture/Forestry in Region 2000  Population center with Lynchburg metropolitan area – access to customers and opportunities for direct and value-added products  Central location accessible to multiple markets in Virginia as well as in the Mid-Atlantic (e.g. proximity to Charlotte, Richmond, Baltimore, Washington, D.C.)  Diversified economy with major employer operations located in the region (e.g. Abbott Nutrition, Areva, B&W, etc.)  Higher education institutions in the region (i.e. Central Virginia Community College, Liberty University, Lynchburg College, Randolph College, Sweet Briar College)

Agriculture  Westover Dairy – dairy processing facility for Kroger located in Lynchburg; 90 employees, majority live in the area; produces 20-25 million gallons of milk per year; receive raw milk at the facility; been in operation over 44 years; 90% of waste is recycled at the facility; have programs in place to donate product to local nonprofit organizations (e.g. Daily Bread)  Colonial Farm Credit - 600 individual customers, $40-$50 million in loans in the region to purchase real estate, build homes, fund general operating, and capital needs;  Centra Health – commitment to sustainability and purchasing locally grown foods; Eco-Express program is available for hospital staff to pay a small membership fee and use reusable plastic containers/cups rather than one-use Styrofoam containers; estimate 1/3rd of food purchases from June-August); have community gardens at hospital facilities – chefs use fresh herbs and produce from the gardens in their preparations; work directly with local producers  Lynchburg Area Food Council – policy-based, assisting with education about healthy eating, buying locally grown  Lynchburg Grows – urban farm in Lynchburg that provides locally grown produce and flowers; collaboration with Virginia State University to assist with specialty crop production  Land rich which enhances the ability to produce – acres available, prices have come down

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 61

 Livestock Market in Lynchburg – well-regarded with good participation  Cattle operations – have seen more profitability with rise in beef prices  Number of unique, small agriculture operations in the region  4-H and FFA – pockets in the region with lots of activity and recognition (e.g. in Appomattox County)

Forestry  Strong forestry land base – acres/volume and network of landowners, loggers, and timber dealers  Paper mills and saw mills located in the region (e.g. International Paper, Georgia Pacific, Grief)  Georgia Pacific – has three facilities in Region 2000 (Big Island (Bedford County) – paper mill with 330 employees; Brookneal (Campbell County) – produces oriented strand board (similar to plywood) at a facility with 130 employees; Brookneal Chip Mill – facility is contracted out with 17 employees); buy wood chips from approximately 70 sawmills in the area; facility been in the area since 1891, owned by Georgia Pacific since 1990; don’t have much trouble finding qualified employees for majority of hourly positions; have to recruit a wider area for some specialized positions  Biomass energy – two power plants in Region 200 that are 100% wood-fired

Constraints/Challenges in Region 2000  Connecting small producers to markets – better ways for producers to get involved in direct marketing, connected to large buyers and also for those interested in locally grown to have understanding of what produce, meat, etc. is available locally at any given time so it can be accessed – one common resources for this would be beneficial  For locally grown produce, ability to have reliable volume and quality to meet orders of larger buyers – need capacity and capability for it to be viable rather than just a few months each year  Agriculture education programs in K-12 could be grown – ways to incorporate 4-H and FFA into urban areas and get students in rural areas interested in agriculture again  Awareness of job opportunities in agriculture – not just farmers but includes marketing, processing facilities, logistics, etc. and making students, particularly those at the region’s colleges and universities aware of these opportunities  Education about Agriculture and Forestry – misconceptions from the public and ways to provide better information about its economic impact in the region and job opportunities available  Food deserts – areas in Lynchburg without easy access to fresh produce and nutritious foods  Need for more processing facilities based in the region (e.g. grain processing facilities, meat processers)  Increased competition particularly with introduction/growth of new products (e.g. almond and soy milk)  Lending to specialty crop producers – not traditional so it can be difficult for lenders to provide loans – need a better understanding of financial opportunity  Oversight of small operation, local meat – some issues with quality control and level of certification (state vs. USDA) and making quality consistent to the consumer (e.g. different requirements for what is sold at a farmers market than what is sold at a grocery store)  Poultry – lack of operations in the region, constrained due to local policies enacted; also no local processing facilities

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 62

 National/State networks for selling product – might want to buy from local producers but tied into networks that determine what goes where (e.g. product from Shenandoah Valley or Pennsylvania goes to Lynchburg; product from region goes to North Carolina)  Growth of area and increased urbanization can impact available farm acreage and timberland  Agri-tourism – some activities but not as well organized as in other regions in Virginia

Opportunities to Improve/Strengthen Agriculture and Forestry in Region 2000  Regularly updated list of available locally grown products – producers can provide updates and this can be distributed to restaurants, employers (e.g. hospitals, colleges/universities, K-12 schools), consumers, etc.  Sustainable Forestry/tree planting initiative – opportunity to work with Virginia Forestry Association and promote better awareness of forestry in the region  Internship programs to help regional employers work with colleges and universities in the area to raise awareness of their job options and build employees internally from interns  Agri-tourism – great opportunity to develop a collaborative approach to link the region’s assets (e.g. orchards, vineyards, pumpkin patches, etc.) and promote to visitors and regional residents  Farmers Market – marketing and continuing to grow and utilizing technical assistance and resources available (e.g. Colonial Farm Credit has monetary assistance available)  Potential for urban ag research center/training center in Lynchburg – preliminary discussions underway between Virginia State University and Lynchburg Grows  Education to producers about specialty crops and how they can be profitable (get more of return on investment on smaller amount of acreage) – technical assistance available from Virginia State University and Virginia Tech  Better inform regional residents about the economic impact of agriculture and forestry in the region  Investigate feasibility for meat processing, grain processing facilities  Hire/identify dedicated, full-time staff focused on agriculture and economic development in the region; focus is on gathering, maintaining information on available products, connecting producers to additional markets, promoting agri-tourism, etc.  Information to regional cattle producers on export markets – Commonwealth is exploring how to better connect and ways to improve process to make profitable  FFA/4-H in urban schools – connecting city students with agriculture  Investigate food hub with realistic objectives and financial considerations in mind – needs model that suits market economy and will garner support/buy-in from larger purchasers  Promote healthy lifestyle and nutrition to regional residents and where to purchase fresh, locally grown produce, meat, etc.  Connect local workforce training specific to agriculture and forestry  Provide new farmer training initiatives and programming to educate about practices and production in marketing  Utilize services and resources available from Cooperative Extension Service, Farm Bureau, Farm Credit, etc.

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 63

Appendix F: SWOT Analysis

The Consulting Team prepared a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) Analysis utilizing findings from the launch meeting with the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team, local input sessions, and one-on-one interviews. A draft of the SWOT Analysis was presented by the Consulting Team to the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team during a planning session held in Lynchburg on February 19, 2014. Additions and changes were incorporated into the SWOT Analysis based on feedback provided during the planning session. The SWOT Analysis informed the development of Guiding Principles, Goals, and Projects defined in the Strategic Plan. STRENGTHS

. Population Center – customers and opportunities for direct and value-added products in Lynchburg metropolitan area . Central Location – accessible to multiple markets in Virginia as well as in the Mid-Atlantic (e.g. proximity to Charlotte, Richmond, Baltimore, Washington, D.C.) . Diversified Economy – major employer operations located in the region (e.g. Abbott Laboratories, AREVA, B&W, Georgia Pacific, Frito Lay, Greif, etc.) . Higher Education – large number of college students (e.g. CVCC, Liberty University, Lynchburg College, Randolph College, Sweet Briar College, Virginia University of Lynchburg) . High quality environment for agriculture with good soil and water resources . Growing direct to consumer activities (e.g. Lynchburg Community Market, farmers markets, Lynchburg Grows) . Presence of a local food movement and enthusiasm of young leaders . Active Organizations (e.g. Cattleman’s Association) with networking opportunities . Pockets of Strong 4-H/FFA activities (e.g. Appomattox County FFA with land lab) . Cattle operations – have seen more profitability with rise in beef prices . Active Virginia Cooperative Extension offices in the localities . Strong forestry land base – acres/volume and network of landowners, loggers, and timber dealers . Paper mills and saw mills located in the region (e.g. International Paper, Georgia Pacific, Greif) . Biomass energy – two power plants in Region 2000 that are 100% wood-fired

WEAKNESSES

. Education about Agriculture and Forestry – misconceptions from the public and ways to provide better information about its economic impact in the region and job opportunities available . Food deserts – areas in Lynchburg without easy access to fresh produce and nutritious foods . Processing facilities based in the region – lack of grain processing facilities, meat processers . Producers lack of knowledge, technical assistance about direct marketing

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 64

. Broadband access – some rural areas with bad connections and not easy to access resources and monitor web-based activities . Youth involvement in agriculture– decreased participation in some FFA, 4-H chapters, how to get more involved and education on careers available in agriculture . Capital-intensive – there are higher costs to entry, preventing new producers from entering the market . Lending to specialty crop producers – not traditional so it can be difficult for lenders to provide loans – need a better understanding of financial opportunity . Silos – lack of communication between organizations doing similar or connecting things . Reliable volume and quality of locally grown produce – ability to meet orders of larger buyers . Local USDA inspection of food products – have state inspections but need USDA inspection to sell to larger buyers . Poultry – lack of operations in the region, constrained due to local policies enacted; also no local processing facilities . Awareness of Sustainable Forestry – forestry is an asset than many landowners have, but they do not see the value or how to take advantage of it . Forestry land use taxation – much needed to take pressure off land owners to bear county taxes (e.g. Appomattox County) . Agri-tourism – some activities but not as well organized as in other regions in Virginia

OPPORTUNITIES

. Awareness about Agriculture and Forestry in the Region – educate internal audiences and tie-in with external economic development efforts . Agri-tourism – great opportunity to develop a collaborative approach to link the region’s assets (e.g. orchards, vineyards, pumpkin patches, etc.) and promote to visitors and regional residents . Growing the local food economy – take advantage of the opportunities that are available with an urban agriculture setting . Local branding programs such as Buy Fresh/Buy Local – technical assistance for direct marketing . Education and experiential learning opportunities in agriculture and forestry for local students – look at field trips, internship, summer work opportunities . Regularly updated list of available locally grown products – producers can provide updates and this can be distributed to restaurants, employers (e.g. hospitals, colleges/universities, K-12 schools), consumers, etc. . Support and encourage a community that fosters agriculture in many segments – local government, non-ag industry, service providers (such as feed, other input suppliers, insurance, banking), and the linkages between these types of organizations and business . Support for entrepreneurship activities in agriculture – understanding specialty crops, niche markets, etc.

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 65

. Hire/identify dedicated, full-time staff focused on agriculture and forestry in the region; focus is on gathering, maintaining information on available products, connecting producers to additional markets, promoting agri-tourism, etc. . Provide new farmer training initiatives – programming to educate about practices and production, direct marketing, etc.

THREATS

. Growth of area and increased urbanization – can impact available farm acreage and timberland . Major barrier is cash flow for new farming operations – challenging to get credit, purchase land, and turn profit . No real manufacturing or other industry left in certain counties – need to have jobs locally so residents do not leave . Personal and consumer apathy – health and value of locally grown, fresh products . Farming not a full-time job (provides less than 50% of income) – don’t always have the time or resources to put more into the farm when there needs to be another job to make a living . Attitude surrounding agriculture – producers themselves need to focus on being positive in the way they talk about farming, especially to kids . Buy-in from local governments – work on zoning and ordinances in localities that support agriculture, forestry, and food production/distribution options . National/State networks for selling product – might want to buy from local producers but tied into networks that determine what goes where (e.g. product from Shenandoah Valley or Pennsylvania goes to Lynchburg; product from region goes to North Carolina)

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 66

Appendix G: Data Snapshots

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 67

Agriculture IMPACT Forestry IMPACT

DIRECT DIRECT $1.46 B $806.1 M 5,227 jobs 2,560 jobs

TOTAL TOTAL $1.81 B $1.05 B 7,997 jobs 4,606 jobs

Source: The Economic Impacts of Agriculture and Forest Industries in Virginia, June 2013, Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service, University of Virginia

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 68 TOP CROP ITEMS BY VALUE OF SALES Crop Amt. ($1,000) Cattle and calves 41,320 Milk from cows 9,261 Other crops and hay 7,213 Grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas 7,012 Nursery, greenhouse, floriculture, and sod 2,442

 Region 2000 is home to nearly 3,000 farms,  The average farm size in Region 2000 is around spanning more than 550,000 acres 186 acres  The value of agricultural products sold from  41% of Region 2000 farms’ primary operators

Region 2000 in 2012 was $74,410,000 consider their primary occupation to be something other than farming  This value is an increase of 16% from 2007  67% of farms are operated by full-owners, 28%

Source: by part-owners, and 4% by tenant 2012 USDA Census

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 69 426 farms Agriculture IMPACT Forestry IMPACT 98,966 acres in farms DIRECT DIRECT $20.6 M $227.7 M Average farm size = 232 acres 361 jobs 452 jobs

$9,269,000 in products sold TOTAL TOTAL Average value of products sold $23.7 M $281.5 M 389 jobs 918 jobs per farm = $21,757

Sources: 2012 USDA Census The Economic Impacts of Agriculture and Forest Industries in Virginia, June 2013, Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service, University of Virginia

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 70 TOP CROP ITEMS BY VALUE OF SALES Crop Amt. ($1,000) Cattle and calves 5,769 Crops, including nursery and greenhouse 3,259 Fruits, tree nuts, and berries 1,474 Other crops and hay 1,026 Horses, ponies, mules, burros, and donkeys 129

TOP CROP ITEMS TOP LIVESTOCK ITEMS Crop Acres State Rank Crop Quantity State Rank Forage - land used for all 15,014 38 Cattle and calves 18,760 31 hay and haylage, grass si- Layers 1,086 60 lage, and greenchop Apples Undisclosed 6 Goats, all 566 34 Corn for silage Undisclosed Undisclosed Horses and ponies 486 54 Corn for grain Undisclosed Undisclosed Guineas 206 6 Grapes 81 11

Source: 2012 USDA Census

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 71 410 farms Agriculture IMPACT Forestry IMPACT 96,299 acres in farms DIRECT DIRECT $14.7 M $33.1 M Average farm size = 235 acres 293 jobs 241 jobs

$12,623,000 in products sold TOTAL TOTAL Average value of products sold $17.2 M $40.7 M 314 jobs 312 jobs per farm = $30,789

Sources: 2012 USDA Census The Economic Impacts of Agriculture and Forest Industries in Virginia, June 2013, Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service, University of Virginia

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 72 TOP CROP ITEMS BY VALUE OF SALES Crop Amt. ($1,000) Cattle and calves 6,962

Other crops and hay 1,314

Soybeans 877

Wheat 738 Vegetables, melons, potatoes, and sweet 423 potatoes

TOP CROP ITEMS TOP LIVESTOCK ITEMS Crop Acres State Rank Crop Quantity State Rank Forage - land used for all 17,791 32 Cattle and calves 20,924 29 hay and haylage, grass si- Layers 19,235 16 lage, and greenchop Soybeans for beans 2,345 50 Roosters Undisclosed 14 Wheat for grain, all 2,148 36 Horses and ponies 292 74 Winter wheat for grain 2,148 36 Bison 177 73 Corn for silage 355 46

Source: 2012 USDA Census

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 73 Agriculture IMPACT Forestry IMPACT 1,369 farms DIRECT DIRECT 206,534 acres in farms $146.5 M $299.4 M Average farm size = 151 acres 1,486 jobs 868 jobs $28,283,000 in products sold TOTAL TOTAL $182.9 M $394.4 M Average value of products sold 1,826 jobs 1,736 jobs per farm = $20,660

Sources: 2012 USDA Census The Economic Impacts of Agriculture and Forest Industries in Virginia, June 2013, Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service, University of Virginia

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 74 TOP CROP ITEMS BY VALUE OF SALES Crop Amt. ($1,000) Cattle and calves 15,814 Milk from cows 4,272 Other crops and hay 1,766 Grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas 1,698 Nursery, greenhouse, floriculture, and sod 1,157

TOP CROP ITEMS TOP LIVESTOCK ITEMS Crop Acres State Rank Crop Quantity State Rank Forage - land used for all 46,147 4 Cattle and calves 49,253 9 hay and haylage, grass si- Layers 6,576 20 lage, and greenchop Corn for silage 2,575 10 Horses and ponies 2,506 7 Wheat for grain, all 1,879 38 Goats, all 1,137 10 Winter wheat for grain 1,879 38 Hogs and pigs 435 29 Corn for grain 734 62

Source: 2012 USDA Census

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 75 Agriculture IMPACT* Forestry IMPACT* 761 farms DIRECT DIRECT 150,689 acres in farms $1.28 B $245.9 M Average farm size = 198 3,078 jobs 999 jobs $24,235,000 in products sold TOTAL TOTAL $1.58 B $329.7 M Average value of products sold 5,468 jobs 1,640 jobs per farm = $31,864

* Impact figures include Campbell County and Lynchburg City Sources: 2012 USDA Census The Economic Impacts of Agriculture and Forest Industries in Virginia, June 2013, Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service, University of Virginia

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 76 TOP CROP ITEMS BY VALUE OF SALES Crop Amt. ($1,000) Cattle and calves 12,755 Milk from cows 4,272 Soybeans 1,766 Other crops and hay 1,698 Nursery, greenhouse, floriculture, and sod 1,157

TOP CROP ITEMS TOP LIVESTOCK ITEMS Crop Acres State Rank Crop Quantity State Rank Forage - land used for all 27,383 17 Cattle and calves 34,314 16 hay and haylage, grass si- Sheep and lambs 2,075 25 lage, and greenchop Soybeans for beans 4,338 40 Layers 1,633 45 Wheat for grain, all 2,470 32 Horses and ponies 972 33 Winter wheat for grain 2,470 32 Sheep and lambs 934 24 Corn for silage 2,082 13

Source: 2012 USDA Census

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 77 Appendix H: Asset Map Inventory and Digital Asset Map

Asset Map Inventory

The Asset Map Inventory provides contacts at agencies, suppliers, resources, and technical assistance available to support agriculture and forestry operations as well as information on major ag-related and forestry-related employers in the region. It first provides regional and local contacts for agriculture resources, forestry resources, and educational resources. It then provides county-specific contacts at local businesses available to support producers, information on major local agriculture and forestry employers, and contacts at economic development organizations. It concludes with contacts at statewide agencies and organizations. Many thanks to the members of the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team for their support in developing the Asset Map Inventory. Digital Asset Map

The Asset Map Inventory is translated into a web-based Digital Asset Map utilizing the Google Maps platform. It can be viewed here: https://mapsengine.google.com/map/embed?mid=zg0ss2ELI- 90.kiFR8LIV_TMw. An Excel Worksheet of information in the asset map is available for each local area. Representatives from the local economic development organization and Virginia Cooperative Extension (VCE) office should review annually to make updates. A member of the Strategic Plan Coordinating Team should be designated to combine and incorporate into the Digital Asset Map following the provided instructions. Embedding the Digital Asset Map into Existing Websites

The capability is there to incorporate the Digital Asset Map into Virginia’s Region 2000 website, existing local economic development organization websites, local VCE office websites, and other regional websites. The instructions on the next page describe how this is accomplished. They were adapted from Google Earth Outreach (see link: https://www.google.com/earth/outreach/tutorials/websitemaps.html). 1. Go to Google Maps. Open the map that you wish to embed in your website. You can embed a map of driving directions, a local search or a map you've created using Custom Maps. If you want to view your saved maps, sign in with your Google Account. If you don't have a Google Account, sign up here. 2. Click Link to this page and copy the code from the Paste HTML to embed in website field. To resize and preview the map, click Customize and preview embedded map. 3. Go to your webpage editing application and locate the best place for the map within your website. 4. Paste the map code you copied into the HTML code where you'd like your map to appear on your website. 5. Save your web page and view the map you just embedded.

A tutorial video is available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Zo- 0AV54jPw.

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 78

Table of Contents

Introduction ...... 80 Agriculture Resources ...... 81 Forestry Resources ...... 84 Educational Resources ...... 85 Economic Development Resources ...... 93 Amherst County ...... 96 Appomattox County ...... 97 Bedford County ...... 99 Campbell County ...... 103 City of Lynchburg ...... 105 Statewide Resources and Organizations in Virginia ...... 107

2014

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 79

Introduction

Virginia’s Region 2000 is a regional leadership organization consisting serving Amherst County, Appomattox County, Bedford County, Campbell County, and the City of Lynchburg. As part of its mission, Region 2000 is focused on regional economic development activities identifying ways to promote economic growth that capitalize on the region’s industries, infrastructure, workforce, and natural resources. Industries such as manufacturing, information technology, energy, and healthcare provide the region with a diverse economy and often where economic development attraction, retention, and expansion efforts are focused.

Region 2000 is fortunate to have a number of agriculture and forestry operations as part of its regional economy. This has not been a traditional focus for economic development strategy but an area that Region 2000 is interested in exploring further and defining a collaborative approach to promote economic growth.

The Asset Map Inventory is the first step in a larger project to define an economic development strategy for agriculture and forestry in Region 2000. It provides contacts at agencies, suppliers, resources, and technical assistance available to support agriculture and forestry operations as well as information on major ag-related and forestry-related employers in the region.

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 80

Agriculture Resources

Virginia Farm Bureau

Farm Bureau is a non-governmental, nonpartisan, voluntary organization committed to protecting Virginia’s farms and ensuring a safe, fresh and locally grown food supply. With nearly 150,000 members in 88 county Farm Bureaus, the Virginia Farm Bureau Federation is Virginia’s largest farmers’ advocacy group. The organization works to support its producer members through legislative lobbying, leadership development programs, commodity associations, rural health programs, insurance products, agricultural supplies and marketing, and other services. Virginia Farm Bureau is a voluntary organization wholly controlled by its members and financed by members’ $40 annual dues.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Amherst County Farm Bureau 113 Falcon Crest Lane Amherst, VA 24521 (434) 946-5336 https://vafarmbureau.org/MemberPrograms/CountyFarmBureaus/AmherstCounty.aspx Contact: Derek Mays, President

Appomattox County Farm Bureau 230 Lees Crossing Lane Appomattox, VA 24522 (434) 352-7851 http://www.vafbarchive.org/Appomattox/ Contact: Joanne Jones, President

Bedford County Farm Bureau 803 Blue Ridge Ave. Bedford, VA 24523 (540) 586-9103 http://www.vafbarchive.org/Bedford/bedford2.asp?colD=220 Contact: Bill Nance, President

Campbell County Farm Bureau 923 Village Highway Rustburg, VA 24588 (434) 332-5411 http://www.vafbarchive.org/Campbell/ Contact: Brian Bennett, President

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 81

Peaks of Otter Soil and Water Conservation District

The Peaks of Otter Soil & Water Conservation District serves Bedford City and Bedford County, and aims to focus or coordinate available technical, financial and educational resources so that they meet the needs of the local citizens for conservation of soil, water and related resources.

CONTACT INFORMATION

1071 A Turnpike Road Bedford, VA 24523 (540)587-7645 www.poswcd.com

Robert E. Lee Soil & Water Conservation District

The Robert E. Lee Soil & Water Conservation District is made up of Amherst, Appomattox, and Campbell Counties, and the City of Lynchburg. The District exists to prevent the loss of valuable soil resources through conservation efforts. The District covers an area of about 1,385 square miles.

KEY PROGRAMS/INITIATIVES/SERVICES

 Virginia Agriculture Cost-Share Program – The cost-share program supports using numerous practices in conservation planning to treat animal waste, cropland, pastureland, and forest land. Some are paid for at a straight per acre rate, while others are cost-shared on a percentage basis up to 75%. In some cases, USDA also pays a percentage. In fact, the program’s practices often can be funded by a combination of state, federal and even private funds, reducing the landowner’s expense to less than 20% of the total cost.  Watershed Protection Program – The Watershed Protection Program exists to protect the water supply in the region. The goal of the program is to try to reduce non-point source pollution (NPS) from entering local waterways.

CONTACT INFORMATION

7631 A Richmond Highway Appomattox, VA 24522 (434) 352-9405 http://www.releeconservation.com/index.htm Contact: Julie Stratton, Office Administrator ([email protected])

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 82

USDA Rural Development – Lynchburg

US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Rural Development provides financing through loans, loan guarantees, and grants, for the construction, remodeling or purchasing of modest housing. The agency also provides financing for essential community facilities in the form of loans, business and industry loan guarantees, and loan and grants for water and waste disposal systems. There are also loan programs for Multi-Family Housing, Farm Labor Housing and Self Help Housing.

CONTACT INFORMATION

20311-A Timberlake Road Lynchburg, VA 24502 (434) 239-3473 Contact: Anne Herring, Area Director ([email protected]) www.rurdev.usda.gov/va

USDA Service Centers (Farm Service Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service)

USDA Service Centers are designed to be a single location where customers can access the services provided by the Farm Service Agency and Natural Resources Conservation Service. See link for additional information: http://www.apfo.usda.gov/FSA/stateoffapp?mystate=va&area=home&subject=landing&topic=landing.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Bedford County Service Center 1031 Turnpike Road Bedford, VA 24523 (540) 586-9646 Contacts: Shelby Trail, County Executive Director ([email protected]) Jessie Howard, District Conservationist ([email protected])

Rustburg Service Center (serves Amherst, Appomattox, and Campbell Counties, and City of Lynchburg) 163 Kabler Ln Rustburg, VA 24588 (434) 332-6640 ext. 2 Contacts: Anthony Landrum, County Executive Director ([email protected]) Ronald Kraszewski, Farm Loan Manager ([email protected]) Don Yancey, District Conservationist ([email protected])

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 83

Forestry Resources

Virginia Department of Forestry

The mission of the VA Department of Forestry is to protect and develop healthy, sustainable forest resources for Virginians by providing service focused on:

 Protecting Virginia's Forests from Wildfire  Managing the Forest Resource  Protecting Virginia's Waters  Conservation of Virginia's Forests  Managing the State Lands and Nurseries  Regulated Incentive Programs for Forest Landowners

See link for additional details: http://www.dof.virginia.gov/index.htm.

KEY PROGRAMS/INITIATIVES/SERVICES

 Landowner Services – VDOF offers a variety of services to landowners, including incentive programs, forest management assistance, timber sales assistance, forestry consultants, and tax credits.  Cooperative Forestry – Cooperative Forestry allows private landowners and rural communities to use VDOF programs and partnerships to help care for their forests, strengthen local economies, and maintain a high quality of life.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Amherst County Office (serves Amherst and Campbell Counties) 177 East Monitor Road Amherst, VA 24521 (434) 946-7955 Contact: Martha Warring, Senior Area Forester ([email protected]; (434) 981-4548)

Appomattox County (served by office based in Buckingham County Office) 1685 Francisco Road Dillwyn, VA 23936 (434) 983-1486 Contact: Patrick Murphy, Senior Forester ([email protected]; (434) 547-3421)

Bedford County Office 1071 Turnpike Road, Suite B Bedford, VA 24523

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 84

(540) 586-3109 Contact: Jeremy Falkenau, Senior Forester ([email protected]; (540) 685-3969)

Educational Resources

Virginia Cooperative Extension

Virginia Cooperative Extension brings the resources of Virginia's land-grant universities, Virginia Tech and Virginia State University, to the people of the commonwealth. Understanding that knowledge is power, it places that power in the hands of Virginians and help them learn how to use it to improve the quality of their lives. Extension agents and specialists form a network of educators whose classrooms are the communities, homes, and businesses of Virginia, where they bring research-based solutions to the problems facing Virginians today.

To better utilize the available resources, the Extension forms collaborations with hundreds of public and private partners and volunteers, who help reach larger and more diverse audiences and also leverage the impact of the institutions’ work.

KEY PROGRAMS/INITIATIVES/SERVICES

 Agriculture and Natural Resources – Agriculture and natural resources (ANR) programs help sustain the profitability of agricultural and forestry production and enhance and protect the quality of our land and water resources. We help the agriculture industry use the most current technology and management practices to develop strong businesses that prosper in today's economy. We deliver programs that help put research-based knowledge to work for Virginia's agriculture industry.  Family and Consumer Sciences – Virginia Cooperative Extension views the family unit as the cornerstone of a healthy community. We strive to improve the well-being of Virginia families through programs that help participants put research-based knowledge to work in their lives.  4-H Youth Development – 4-H is a community of young people across America who are learning leadership, citizenship, and life skills. 4-H, the largest comprehensive youth development program in the nation, educates young people, ages 5 to 18, through a variety of experiential techniques that encourage hands-on, active learning.  Community Viability – Community viability programs are dedicated to strengthening communities and their economic viability by creating innovative programs that allow citizens and local governments to respond to local issues. Our faculty can assess community needs, design a plan of action, and determine the appropriate delivery method suitable for various programs.

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 85

CONTACT INFORMATION

Amherst County Office – Virginia Cooperative Extension 100 Goodwin Street Amherst, VA 24521 (434) 946-9365 Contact: John Benner, Extension Agent ([email protected]) http://offices.ext.vt.edu/amherst/

Appomattox County Office – Virginia Cooperative Extension 177 Morton Lane Appomattox, VA 24522 (434) 352-8244 Contact: Bruce Jones, Unit Coordinator, Extension Agent ([email protected]) http://offices.ext.vt.edu/appomattox/

Bedford County Office – Virginia Cooperative Extension 122 East Main Street, Suite 102 Bedford, VA 24523 (540) 586-7675 Contact: Scott Baker, Unit Coordinator, Extension Agent ([email protected]) http://offices.ext.vt.edu/bedford/

Campbell County Office – Virginia Cooperative Extension 163 Kabler Lane Rustburg, VA 24588 (434) 332-9538 Contact: Todd Scott, Unit Coordinator, Extension Agent ([email protected]) http://offices.ext.vt.edu/campbell/

City of Lynchburg Office – Virginia Cooperative Extension 2348 Lakeside Drive P.O. Box 10364 Lynchburg, VA 24506 (434) 455-3740 Contact: Kevin Camm, Unit Coordinator, Extension Agent ([email protected]) http://offices.ext.vt.edu/lynchburg/

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 86

Virginia 4-H Youth Development Program

4-H is the youth development education program of Virginia Cooperative Extension. Through 4-H, young people are encouraged to participate in a variety of activities that emphasize 4-H's "learning by doing" philosophy of youth development. Young people in 4-H learn leadership, citizenship, and a vast array of life skills that benefit them for the rest of their lives.

4-H participants are youth, ages 5 to 19, taking part in programs provided as the result of actions planned and initiated by Extension personnel in cooperation with volunteers. With a direct connection to research at Virginia's land-grant universities, Virginia Tech and Virginia State University, 4-H is the first experience many young people have with higher education. 4-H is characterized as being community-centered, volunteer-led, Extension-staff supervised, research-based, home- and family-oriented, and responsive to change. See link for additional information: http://www.4-h.ext.vt.edu/.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Amherst County 4-H Youth Development 100 Goodwin Street Amherst, VA 24521 (434) 946-9365 Contact: Kevin Irvin ([email protected])

Appomattox County 4-H Youth Development 177 Morton Lane Appomattox, VA 24522 (434) 352-8244 Contact: Bonnie Tillotson ([email protected])

Bedford County 4-H Youth Development 122 East Main Street Bedford County Administration Building, Suite 102 Bedford, VA 24523 (540) 586-7675 Contact: Beth Hawse ([email protected])

Campbell County 4-H Youth Development 163 Kabler Lane Rustburg, VA 24588 (434) 332-9538 Contact: Robbie Morrison ([email protected])

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 87

City of Lynchburg 4-H Youth Development 2348 Lakeside Drive Lynchburg, VA 24501 (434) 455-3740 Contact: Kevin Camm ([email protected])

Holiday Lake 4-H Educational Center

Located only 14 miles northeast of the town of Appomattox, Holiday Lake 4-H Center is within easy driving of many Virginia cities including Richmond, Lynchburg, Roanoke, Charlottesville, and Farmville.

During the months of October through April (by the day or week) and weekends year-round, Holiday Lake 4-H Center facilities are available for groups of up to 120 to experience the stress-free, back-to-basics atmosphere.

The Holiday Lake 4-H Educational Center programs include leadership development, environmental and aquatic science, performing arts, shooting education, forestry, outdoor adventure, high/low ropes course, climbing, primitive skills, journalism and broadcasting, animal science, wildlife, canoeing, fishing, outdoor sports, and swimming.

KEY PROGRAMS/INITIATIVES/SERVICES

 Youth and Family Programs – includes various camps for youth, teens, and families.  Adult Programs – The Adult Education Workshops & Experiential Programs (AEWEP) grew out of a desire to provide adults 18 years and older the opportunities to continue their educations through a variety of hands-on, cultural, and service-oriented programs. Piloted at Holiday Lake in the fall of 2000 with a Banjo Making Workshop, the AEWEP has blossomed into a multi-offering program annually at both centers. Workshops including Natural Dyes, Mandolin Making, Weaving, Outdoor Skills and Experience, Golf, Shooting Education, and Trail-Building and Maintenance.  Natural Resource Education – During the year over 3,200 youth from public and private schools, as well as home school associations, learn through experiencing the Natural Resource Education Program (NRE). The NRE program focuses on teaching students hands-on earth and live science curriculum that is correlated to Virginia’s Standard of Learn (SOLs) during the school year.

CONTACT INFORMATION

1267 4-H Camp Road Appomattox, VA 24522 (434) 248-5444 Contact: Bryan Branch, Center Director ([email protected]) http://holidaylake4h.com/

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 88

Virginia FFA Association

The mission of the National FFA Organization is to make a positive difference in the lives of students by developing their potential for premier leadership, personal growth and career success through agricultural education.

To accomplish its mission, FFA:

 Develops competent and assertive agricultural leadership.  Increases awareness of the global and technological importance of agriculture and its contribution to our well-being.  Strengthens the confidence of agriculture students in themselves and their work.  Promotes the intelligent choice and establishment of an agricultural career.  Encourages achievement in supervised agricultural experience programs.  Encourages wise management of economic, environmental and human resources of the community.  Develops interpersonal skills in teamwork, communications, human relations and social interaction.  Builds character and promotes citizenship, volunteerism and patriotism.  Promotes cooperation and cooperative attitudes among all people.  Promotes healthy lifestyles.  Encourages excellence in scholarship.

Virginia provides FFA activities overseen by the Virginia FFA Association (see link: http://www.vaffa.org) and has local programming available through regional schools.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Amherst County High School FFA 139 Lancer Lane Amherst, VA 24521 (434) 946-2898 Contact: Derek Mays ([email protected])

Appomattox County High School FFA 198 Evergreen Ave, Appomattox, VA 24522 (434) 352-7146 Contact: Ed McCann ([email protected]) http://acpssharepoint.appomattox.k12.va.us/agriculture/FFA/SitePages/Home.aspx

Staunton River High School FFA (Bedford County) 1095 Golden Eagle Drive Moneta, VA 24121

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 89

(540) 297-7151 Contact: Diane Poole ([email protected])

Liberty High School (Bedford County) 100 Liberty Minuteman Drive Bedford, VA 24523 (540) 586-2541, ext. 725 Contact: Lindsay Tomlinson ([email protected])

William Campbell Combined School (Campbell County) 474 William Campbell Drive Naruna, VA 24576 (434) 376-2015 Contact: Roy Wilson ([email protected]) http://www.campbell.k12.va.us/index.aspx?page=832

Central Virginia Community College

Central Virginia Community College, a two-year institution established as a member of the Virginia Community College System, provides State-supported educational facilities beyond the high school level for the cities of Lynchburg and Bedford and the counties of Amherst, Appomattox, Bedford, and Campbell. The curricula and programs of the College serve more than 228,000 people within this geographical jurisdiction.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Central Virginia Community College 3506 Wards Road Lynchburg, VA 24502 (434) 832-7600 http://cvcc.vccs.edu/index.asp

Altavista Center (Campbell County) 701 5th Street, Suite 100 Altavista, VA 24517 (434) 309-1225

Amherst Center 200 Richmond Highway Suite 103 Amherst, VA 24521 (434) 832-7898

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 90

Appomattox Center 136 Carver Lane Appomattox, VA 24522 (434) 832-7200

Bedford Center 1633 Venture Blvd. P.O. Box 925 Bedford, VA 24523 (434) 832-7284

Liberty University

Liberty University is the largest private, nonprofit university in the nation, the largest university in Virginia, and the largest Christian university in the world. Nestled in the Blue Ridge Mountains on more than 7,000 acres in Lynchburg, VA, Liberty offers over 300 programs from the certificate to the doctoral level, and is home to more than 100,000 residential and online students.

KEY PROGRAMS/INITIATIVES/SERVICES

 Morris Campus Garden – The campus garden became available to students in the summer of 2013. Liberty University developed a 70-acre tract of land where students can enjoy farming and agriculture. The 15 acres of prepared land is home to various fruits, vegetables, and herbs. Students take part in preparing the soil, planting the seed, and harvesting the crops. The vegetables have been used by campus dining halls and local community food organizations.

CONTACT INFORMATION

1971 University Boulevard Lynchburg, VA 24515 (434) 582-2000 Contact: Alicia Cripe, Campus Garden Manager ([email protected])

Lynchburg College

Lynchburg College is a private, independent, residential college located on 250 beautiful acres in central Virginia. The student body numbers 2,700 undergraduate and graduate students. LC offers 39 undergraduate majors, 52 minors, 13 pre-professional programs, and 14 graduate degrees, all supported by a strong liberal arts foundation.

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 91

KEY PROGRAMS/INITIATIVES/SERVICES

 Environmental Science and Environmental Studies – Majors and minors are available in environmental science and environmental studies to study the effects of the human population on the environment and the pressures that face the earth, as well as strategies for environmental protection, conservation, and sustainability.  Claytor Nature Study Center – The Claytor Nature Study Center is a preserved farm and plantation that serves as an education and research center for environmental study.  Center for Economic Education - The Center for Economic Education at Lynchburg College promotes economic literacy with a special emphasis on educating and supporting K-12 teachers. Innovative, SOL-compliant economic education resources and training opportunities are provided for teachers to develop students into competent, productive participants in our local and global economy.

CONTACT INFORMATION

1501 Lakeside Drive Lynchburg, VA 24501 (434) 544-8791 Contact: Rebecca Booth, Director ([email protected]) http://www.lynchburg.edu/center-economic-education

Randolph College

Randolph College in Lynchburg offers liberal arts curriculum in 30 majors and 44 minors. Randolph’s campus—all trees and grass and red brick buildings—is minutes from the Blue Ridge Mountains and the James River, so any time is a good time for mountain biking, hiking, rafting or simply taking a scenic study break.

KEY PROGRAMS/INITIATIVES/SERVICES

 Organic Garden and Orchard – The Organic Garden at Randolph College is a small parcel of land located on a hill northeast of the Maier Museum that has been developed through the efforts of students, staff, faculty, and members of the Lynchburg community dedicated to the principles and practices of organic gardening such as Permaculture and Indigenous Knowledge (IK).

CONTACT INFORMATION

2500 Rivermont Ave. Lynchburg, VA 24503 (434) 947-8387

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 92

Contact: Ludovic Lemaitre, Sustainability Coordinator at Randolph College ([email protected]) http://www.randolphcollege.edu/x16458.xml

Sweet Briar College

Sweet Briar College is a small liberal arts college for women located 12 miles north of Lynchburg with a total enrollment of 760 students. According to its mission statement, Sweet Briar College prepares women (and at the graduate level, men as well) to be productive, responsible members of a world community. It focuses on personal and professional achievement through a customized educational program that combines the liberal arts, preparation for careers, and individual development. The faculty and staff guides students to become active learners, to reason clearly, to speak and write persuasively, and to lead with integrity. They do so by creating an educational environment that is both intense and supportive and where learning occurs in many different venues, including the classroom, the community, and the world (see link: http://sbc.edu/about/our-mission).

KEY PROGRAMS/INITIATIVES/SERVICES

 Sustainability Steering Committee – Work has begun through an identified steering committee focused on a long-range plan focused on a commitment to sustainability. So far, it has identified five areas that will underpin the plan: energy usage, student engagement, community initiatives, land usage and a mechanism to make progress reports available.

CONTACT INFORMATION

134 Chapel Road (434) 381-6276 Sweet Briar, VA 24595 Contact: Donna Meeks, Grounds Superintendent, Physical Plant ([email protected]) http://www.sustainability.sbc.edu/index.html

Economic Development Resources

Amherst County Economic Development

Amherst County Economic Development is committed to the local business community and its success. The department advertises the advantages of doing business in Amherst County to support business retention, expansion, and attraction.

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 93

153 Washington Street Amherst, VA 24521 (434) 946-9400 http://www.countyofamherst.com/department/?fDD=9-0

Amherst County Economic Development Authority

The Economic Development Authority of Amherst County was created by the Amherst County Board of Supervisors with authority to acquire, own, lease, and dispose of properties and make loans for the general purpose of promoting and developing manufacturing, industrial, governmental, non-profit, and commercial enterprises and institutions of higher education to locate or remain in Amherst County.

P.O. Box 390 Amherst, VA 54251 (434) 946-9400 http://www.countyofamherst.com/department/board.php?fDD=9-79 Donald Manley, Chairman

Appomattox County Economic Development Authority

The Appomattox County Economic Development Authority develops and executes a business attraction and retention program in order to stimulate job creation and build the commercial tax base. The Board of Supervisors uses the commercial tax base to fund public services for a growing and diversifying population.

153-A Morton Lane Appomattox, VA 24522 (434) 352-3637 Contact: Jeff Taylor, Director ([email protected]) http://www.appomattoxcountyva.gov/

Bedford County Office of Economic Development

The Bedford County Office of Economic Development understands the drivers that support a healthy economy, and is committed to nurturing and supporting efforts to sustain a community that results in quality jobs for county residents. The office assists with starting, locating or expanding businesses in the County, and provides information and connections with local, state and national resources that offer programs or assistance that meet businesses’ needs. The Office of Economic Development works with the Bedford County Economic Development Authority (EDA) which consists of members appointed by the Board of Supervisors to four-year terms and represent one of the seven election districts.

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 94

The Bedford County Agriculture Economic Development Advisory Board was established by the Bedford County Board of Supervisors in the spring of 2007 to develop and implement a continuing plan to sustain and enhance the rural economy, including support for farms, dairies, cattle operations and other industries. http://www.bedfordeconomicdevelopment.com/agriculture-in-bedford-county-virginia/ag-board/

122 East Main Street, Suite 202 Bedford County, VA 24523 (540) 587-5670 Contact: Traci Bildo, Director of Economic Development ([email protected] ) http://www.bedfordeconomicdevelopment.com/

Campbell County Department of Economic Development

The Campbell County Department of Economic Development supports the growth of the local economy through the promotion of resources for improving quality of life, business development, and tourism.

47 Courthouse Lane Rustburg, VA 24588 (434) 592-9595 Mike Davidson, Director ([email protected]) http://www.campbellvirginia.com/

Lynchburg Economic Development Authority

The Lynchburg Economic Development Authority, or LEDA, is a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia and serves as the incentive arm of the City of Lynchburg. But the LEDA takes a much more active role in economic development efforts than more passive, pass-through-oriented EDAs. LEDA actively pursues investment and development opportunities, and elevates the economic development profile of the City.

900 Church Street Lynchburg, VA 24504 (434) 455-4490 Marjette Upshur, Director ([email protected]) http://opportunitylynchburg.com/

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 95

Amherst County

Amherst Milling Company

140 Union Hill Road Amherst, VA 24521 (434)946-7601

Colleen Feed & Seed

4071 Thomas Nelson Highway Arrington, VA 22922 (434) 263-4919

Green Valley Meat Processors

2494 W. Perch Road Monroe, VA 24574 (434) 299-5529 Contact: Joseph Albert

Greif Brothers

P.O. Box 339 Amherst, VA 24521 (434)933-8681

Outback Motorsports

After opening in 1996 as a used car and ATV dealership, Outback Motorsports has steadily grown to include used farm equipment, implements, new/used lawn and garden equipment, and new/used compact and utility tractors.

1953 South Amherst Highway Amherst, VA 24521 (434) 381-6035 http://www.outbackmotorsports.com/

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 96

Performance Livestock and Feed Company –Amherst Dealers

A.W. Tomlin Madison Heights, VA 24572 (434) 316-3054

Frank Walton 222 Smokey Haven Rd Amherst, VA 24521 (434)922-7485

Tractor Supply Co.

Tractor Supply provides products to support their customers' rural lifestyle, from welders and generators to animal care products and men and women's workwear. Each store team includes welders, farmers and horse owners who collectively provide an exceptional depth of knowledge and resources. Tractor Supply is committed to understanding and fulfilling the needs of those who enjoy the rural lifestyle: folks who frequently describe themselves as hobby farmers and hobby ranchers.

248 Amelon Square Madison Heights, VA 24521 (434) 929-6730 http://www.tractorsupply.com/

Appomattox County

Agrarian Veterinary Services

Agrarian Veterinary Services is a full service large animal veterinary practice.

P.O. Box 225 Buckingham, VA 23921 (757) 277-2637 Dr. Lincoln Montgomery-Rodgers http://www.agrarianvet.com/

Appomattox Animal Hospital

5399 Richmond Hwy Appomattox, VA

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 97

(434) 352-8483 http://www.appomattoxanimalhosp.com/ Dr. Bill Burger

Campbell Lumber Company

4374 Promise Land Rd Appomattox, VA 24522 (434) 352-7829

Chestnut Mountain Feed

557 Vineyard Road Concord, Virginia 24538 (434) 993-2556 http://chestnutmountainfeed.homestead.com/

Coleman Farm Supply

125 Main Street Appomattox, VA 24522 (434) 352-7298 Contact: Ron Coleman

MeadWestvaco Forestry (now Plum Creek Timber)

MeadWestvaco has divested the local timber holdings to Plum Creek Timber.

6969 Richmond Hwy Appomattox, VA 24522 (434) 352-2622

Rockydale Quarries Corporation

The Appomattox location provides agricultural lime for raising soil pH for row crop and forage production.

143 Quarry Road Appomattox, VA 24522 (434) 933-8258 Contact: Bobby Sutphin http://www.rockydalequarries.com/sp/AgriculturalLime.htm

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 98

Tiger Fuel

Tiger Fuel Company is Central Virginia’s largest local distributor of petroleum energy products, including propane, heating oil, and branded gasoline: Exxon, Texaco, Shell, BP, Citgo, and EXCEL.

103 Commerce Street Appomattox, VA 24522 (434) 352-5757 Contact: T.B. Wright, Facility Manager

Tractor Supply Co.

7645 Richmond Highway Appomattox, VA 24522 (434) 352-5206 http://www.tractorsupply.com/

Bedford County

Augusta Co-op

The Augusta co-op supplies the items you need to keep your farm running – feed, fertilizer, agronomic services, fencing, cattle handling equipment, and waterers.

1078 Custer Lane Bedford, VA 24523 (434) 546-0771 www.augustacoop.com

Bedford Animal Hospital

1064 Centerville Road Bedford, VA 24523 (540) 586-0372 Contact: Dr. Scott Noe ([email protected])

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 99

Boone Tractor

Boone Tractor supplies top products to the agricultural, industrial and commercial markets. Services include equipment rental, repair and parts supply.

1111 East Main Street Bedford, VA 24523 (540)586-2134 www.boonetractor.com

Boxely Materials Co.

Boxely primarily engages in producing stone and paving materials. They also produce and market agricultural lime as part of Blue Ridge location’s business.

15415 West Lynchburg Salem Turnpike Blue Ridge, VA 24064 Main Office (540) 947-2211 Contact: Ronnie Thompson, (540) 354-5971 http://www.boxley.com/products/aggregate/

EcoFriendly

As a leading proponent of alternative agriculture, EcoFriendly Foods purchases locally grown, specially bred livestock from a regional network of farmers adhering to strict ethical standards, and processes pork, beef, lamb and chicken at its Moneta, Va., facility for sale to leading East Coast restaurateurs and direct-to- consumers at several regional farmers’ markets.

3397 Stony Fork Road Moneta, VA 24121 (540) 297-9582 http://ecofriendly.com/

Georgia Pacific – Big Island

Utilizes wood products to produce containerboard used as corrugating medium for boxes.

9363 Jackson Hwy Big Island, VA 24526 (434) 299-5911

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 100

Little Doc’s Veterinary Care

1484 Wandering Acres Road Huddleston, VA 24104 (540) 297-1051 Contact: Karen Baum ([email protected])

Moneta Home and Farm Center

11739 Moneta Road Moneta, VA 24121 (540) 297-5558 www.monetafhc.com

New London Trailers

13001 East Lynchburg-Salem Turnpike Forest, VA 24551 (434) 525-1211 www.newlondontrailers.com

Oakridge Cattle Equipment

1954 Patterson Mill Road Bedford, VA 24523 (540) 330-9089 [email protected]

Powers Tractor & Equipment

17690 Stewartsville Road Vinton, VA 24179 (540) 890-4055 www.powerstractor.com

Robertson Equipment

1545 Link Road Bedford, VA 24523 (540) 586-9186

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 101

Royal Oak Farm

Royal Oak Farm, LLC owns and operates the largest solid waste composting operation in Virginia, capable of handling over 300 tons per day of clean, non-toxic, non-hazardous biodegradable materials. These materials are professionally recycled into composts, topsoils, and specialty compost-based soil blends.

1220 Royal Oak Farm Road Evington, VA 24550 (540) 297-3299 http://www.royaloakfarmllc.com/

Southern State Co-op

1053 Independence Blvd. Bedford, VA 24523 (540) 586-8201 www.southernstates.com

Springlake Stockyard

1069 Sickle Court P O Box 147 Moneta, VA 24121 (540) 297-1707 Contact: Brandy Ferguson, General Manager www.springlakeauctions.com

Tractor Supply – Bedford

1128 East Lynchburg-Salem Turnpike Bedford, VA 24523 (540) 587-6600 www.tractorsupply.com

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 102

Campbell County

Altavista Power Station

Altavista Power Station uses 100% renewable biomass as its fuel. The fuel is primarily derived from waste wood typically left behind in the forests as part of the logging process for roundwood. Roundwood is harvested to make lumber, pulp and paper, or wood pellets. Waste wood is the smaller tree tops and branches left behind after roundwood harvesting.

104 Wood Lane Altavista, VA 24517 (434) 369-4406 https://www.dom.com/about/stations/fossil/altavista-power-station.jsp

Bartlett Milling Co. Inc.

7126 Wards Road Rustburg, VA 24588 (434) 821-2501

Dodd Farm Supply

1103 Lynchburg Ave Brookneal, VA 24528 (434) 376-5901

Goldys Truck Plaza

7335 Wards Road Rustburg, VA 24588 (434) 821-1513

Farm Bureau Insurance

923 Village Highway Rustburg, VA 24588 (434) 332-5411

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 103

Farm Service Co. Inc.

13693 Wards Road Lynchburg, VA 24501 (434) 239-2421

Foster Fuels

6720 Brookneal Highway Brookneal, VA 24528 (434) 376-2322

Georgia Pacific – Brookneal

Processes hardwood chips into paper products

245 Price Ave Brookneal, VA 24528 (434) 376-6202

Lynchburg Livestock Market

243 Livestock Road Lynchburg, VA 24501 (434) 821-5956 Dwayne Gilliam, Owner

Peaks Slaughter House

4832 Campbell Highway Lynchburg, VA 24501 (434) 846-5593

Phillips Equipment Corp.

10364 Wards Road Rustburg, VA 24588 (434) 821-2649

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 104

Schrocks Slaughter House

4141 Pigeon Run Rd. Glayds, VA 24554 (434)283-5400

VDACS Lab

4832 Tyreeanna Road Lynchburg, VA 24504 (434) 200-9994

City of Lynchburg

Conner Produce Co., Inc.

Wholesale company for fruits and vegetables in Central Virginia.

125 Oakley Avenue Suite B Lynchburg, VA 24501 (434) 845-4583 Contact: Connie Mattox http://connerproduce.com

Flowers Baking Company of Lynchburg

Produces fresh baked breads and cakes with 160 employees at its Lynchburg facility.

1905 Hollins Mill Road Lynchburg, VA 24503 (434) 528-0441 Contact: Jackie Forrest http://www.flowersfoods.com/

Frito Lay

Food manufacturer of snack products including tortilla chips and potato chips with 400 employees at its Lynchburg facility.

230 Jefferson Ridge Pkwy

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 105

Lynchburg, VA 24501 (434) 316-5700

International Paper

Manufacturer of corrugated packaging employing 175 employees at its Lynchburg facility.

3491 Mayflower Drive Lynchburg, VA 24501 (434) 522-2701 Contact: Aimee Gregg

Lynchburg Area Food Council

The Lynchburg Area Food Council (LAFC) is a non-profit organization, comprised of partners from various segments of the health, farm, education, service, and food communities. It is a forum for food system issues, advocate for coordination between sectors, clearinghouse to develop and evaluate policy affecting health and nutrition, and the catalyst to launch and support programs as they address food access, insecurity, quality, and systems.

(434) 947-2629 Contact: Leslie Hoglund, Senior Health Educator ([email protected]) http://lynchburgareafoodcouncil.org/

Lynchburg Community Market

The Lynchburg Community Market offers the best of locally produced fruit, vegetables, cheese, meat, baked goods, and specialty items. Farmers sell their products on Wednesdays and Saturdays year-round.

1219 Main Street Lynchburg, VA 24504 (434) 455-4485 http://www.lynchburgva.gov/community-market

Lynchburg Grows

Lynchburg Grows’ mission is to help all disadvantaged persons enjoy the healthy benefits of gardening and have access to such spaces. Lynchburg Grows is responding to critical community issues by creating nutrition and food systems programming for elementary school children, implementing a vocational training program for disabled and low-income individuals, and organizing workshops for anyone interested

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 106 in increasing their gardening efforts. Lynchburg Grows currently has programs at seven community centers, five targeted elementary schools, six local gardening efforts, and a summer camp.

1339 Englewood Street Lynchburg, VA 24501 (434) 846-5665 Contact: Michael G. Van Ness, Esq., President ([email protected]) http://lynchburggrows.org/

Lynchburg Wholesale Floral Corporation

Wholesale company that provides fresh cut flowers and floral supplies to businesses in Central Virginia.

2004 Memorial Avenue Lynchburg, VA 24501 (434) 845-9095 http://lynchburgwholesale.com/

Westover Dairy

Dairy processing facility for the Kroger Co. in Lynchburg with 90 employees.

2801 Fort Avenue Lynchburg, VA 24501 (434) 528-2580 Contact: Jeff Wilkerson, General Manager ([email protected])

Statewide Resources and Organizations in Virginia

Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services

The Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services is located within the Governor's Secretariat of Agriculture and Forestry and has both economic development and regulatory responsibilities under state law.

VDACS is organized into four units - the Commissioner's Office, Division of Animal and Food Industry Services (AFIS), Division of Consumer Protection, and Division of Marketing.

The agency employs about 498 employees who work in and out of the Department's several field offices; in the agency's five regional diagnostic animal health laboratories located in Warrenton, Lynchburg, Ivor, Harrisonburg, and Wytheville; at an international office in Hong Kong and at the VDACS headquarters in

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 107

Richmond. The Agency utilizes representatives in Asia, Europe, India and Latin America to promote Virginia agricultural products in these important export markets.

KEY PROGRAMS/INITIATIVES/SERVICES

 Virginia Grown – To encourage consumers to buy from local farmers and vendors, VDACS hosts www.VirginiaGrown.com to assist in locating local foods and beverages, plus plants, gifts, wool, and other non-edible items.  Agriculture and Forestry Development Services – Agriculture and Forest Development Services (AFDS) staff assist entrepreneurs and existing companies at every stage of their business, from developing the concept to coordinating the Grand Opening.  Virginia’s Finest – Virginia’s Finest promotes the development of Virginia agriculture and specialty food products. It highlights top quality Virginia-produced and processed products, including snacks, candy, nuts, cider, meats, and produce. Consumers recognize the familiar Virginia's Finest "checkmark" and trust that Virginia's Finest products have been deemed the best of the best.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services 102 Governor Street Richmond, VA 23219 (804) 786-7686 Contact: Sandra J. Adams, Acting Commissioner ([email protected]) http://www.vdacs.virginia.gov

Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation

The Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) works to give individuals, businesses, communities and all levels of government the tools and information needed to make wise decisions in conserving Virginia’s natural and recreational resources through planning, funding, education, and in some cases, regulation.

KEY PROGRAMS/INITIATIVES/SERVICES

 Land Conservation – The Office of Land Conservation helps citizens and organizations protect their land by understanding all of the options available, providing information to the public, and providing services to state and local agencies through technical assistance, workshops and training, and serving as a clearinghouse for information.

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 108

CONTACT INFORMATION

Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation 600 East Main Street, 24th Floor Richmond, VA 23219 (804) 786-6124 Contact: David Johnson, Director ([email protected]) http://www.dcr.virginia.gov

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

DEQ administers state and federal laws and regulations for air quality, water quality, water supply and land protection. In addition, other programs cover a variety of environmental activities, such as improving the ability of businesses and local governments to protect the environment, and offering technical and financial assistance for air and water quality improvements.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Blue Ridge Regional Office 7705 Timberlake Road Lynchburg, VA 24502 Contact: Robert Weld, Regional Director, (540) 562-6870 http://www.deq.virginia.gov/TheVirginiaDepartmentofEnvironmentalQuality.aspx

Virginia Agribusiness Council

The Virginia Agribusiness Council is a non-profit member organization committed to representing the agriculture and forest industries in the Commonwealth with a unified voice through effective government relations efforts. Members include family and commercial farms, agribusiness companies, agricultural leaders, urban agriculture, industry associations, and professional individuals.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Virginia Agribusiness Council P.O. Box 718 Richmond, VA 23218 (804) 643-3555 Contact: Katie Frazier ([email protected])

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 109

Virginia Association of Biological Farming

The Virginia Association for Biological Farming (VABF) is the primary organization in the state of Virginia concerned with organic and biological farming and gardening. The organization is dedicated to bringing best practices and information about living lightly on the land.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Virginia Association for Biological Farming 9501 Deer Range Road Moseley, VA 23120 Contact: Janet Aardema ([email protected]) http://vabf.org/

Virginia Biosolids Council

OVERVIEW DESCRIPTION

The Virginia Biosolids Council supports the recycling of biosolids in Virginia through information and education on the beneficial use and safety of biosolids. Its membership includes municipal wastewater treatment facilities that clean the waters of Virginia communities, companies that recycle biosolids for gardening and home use, and companies that apply biosolids to agricultural fields and forests throughout Virginia.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Virginia Biosolids Council 1011 E. Main Street, Suite 400 Richmond, VA 23219 (804) 525-1145 Contact: [email protected] http://www.virginiabiosolids.com

Virginia Cattlemen’s Association

The Virginia Cattlemen’s Association (VCA) was organized in 1944 and chartered in 1953 to promote the profit potential of Virginia's cattle industry. The early objectives of VCA were to promote more effective marketing from the farm to the consumer and to present cattlemen's views to the legislature on the state and local levels. These primary objectives provide the basis for most of VCA's activities today.

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 110

In addition to marketing, VCA works for Virginia's cattlemen in many areas, including: media relations, producer information, sponsorship of educational seminars for cattlemen, administrative support for Virginia's Beef Checkoff Program, and coordination of activities with cattle related organizations in Virginia.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Virginia Cattlemen’s Association 4466 Roanoke Road P.O. Box 9 (Mailing address) Daleville, VA 24083 (540) 992-1009 Contact: Jason H Carter, Executive Secretary ([email protected], (540) 292-7688) http://www.vacattlemen.org/

Virginia Farmers Direct Marketing Association

OVERVIEW DESCRIPTION

The members of Virginia Farmers Direct Marketing Association are a diverse group of large and small farmers producing an array of farm-fresh products such as fresh fruits and vegetables, organic herbs, honey, meat and dairy products, Christmas trees, farm experiences, tours, fine dining, bed and breakfasts, and many other value-added products. Their products are marketed in a variety of ways: pick-your-own, on-farm markets, roadside stands, farmers markets, and directly to restaurants and specialty stores. Many direct marketing operations also offer educational and entertaining programs for their customers and their local school systems.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Virginia Farmers Direct Marketing Association (757) 357-6126 Contact: Rachel Chieppa, President ([email protected]) http://www.vfdma.org/

Virginia Food System Council

OVERVIEW DESCRIPTION

The Virginia Food System Council is a Board of 24 volunteer Directors, representing all aspects of our food system from local producers and consumers, social justice and environmental non-profit organizations, to dietitians and statewide organizations. We formally began working to strengthen Virginia’s local and

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 111 regional food systems in late 2007. Our mission is to help ensure that all Virginians have access to healthy, affordable food grown right here in Virginia by:

 Educating and communicating to the public, the food system stakeholders, and to key decision makers, a sustainable food system’s impact on health, economic development, natural resources, and social well-being.  Examining how food is produced, distributed, and consumed throughout Virginia’s localities and regions, in order to expedite connections and identify barriers to improvement.  Making policy recommendations and implementing networking strategies to improve the availability and accessibility of safe, nutrient-rich foods to Virginians in all areas.

KEY PROGRAMS/INITIATIVES/SERVICES

 $10-a-week Campaign – A campaign to encourage local residents to incorporate more local food into their diets. The campaign offers tips on finding local food in the community, eating local on a budget, eating local year-round, and nutrition.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Virginia Food System Council 410 East Water Street, Suite 700 Charlottesville, VA 22903 Contact: Spencer Neale, Chair http://virginiafoodsystemcouncil.org/

Virginia Grain Producers Association

OVERVIEW DESCRIPTION

The Virginia Grain Producers Association (VGPA) represents Virginia's corn and small grains producers. VGPA's strategic plan focuses on Market Infrastructure, Media, Influence and Information Technology. The association's resources combined with staff and Board efforts include leadership meetings and travel, five annual events and producer programs implemented to support busy grain producers and Virginia's corn and small grains industries.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Virginia Grain Producers Association 2201 West Main Street Richmond, VA 23220

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 112

Contact: Katie Hellebush, VGPA Executive Director ([email protected] or (804) 726-6022) http://www.virginiagrains.com/

Virginia Independent Consumers & Farmers Association

VICFA was started by a handful of individuals in central Virginia who are deeply concerned about the over- regulation of small farm sales direct to consumers. Consumers were, in fact, being denied their right to have fresh, wholesome foods from farmers whom they knew and trusted. Incorporated in April of 2001 as a non-profit corporation, VICFA's mission statement was and remains: "To promote and preserve unregulated direct farmer-to-consumer trade that fosters availability of locally-grown or home-produced food products."

CONTACT INFORMATION

Virginia Independent Consumers & Farmers Association P.O. Box 6838 Charlottesville, VA 22906 (804) 366-6051 Contact: Lois Smith, President http://www.vicfa.org

Virginia State Dairymen’s Association

The goal of the Virginia State Dairymen’s Association (VSDA) is to provide information about the dairy industry and its producers in Virginia.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Virginia State Dairymen’s Association P.O. Box 29 104 North Main St. Bridgewater, VA 22812 (540) 828-6960 Contact: Cline Brubaker, President http://www.vsdaonline.com

Region 2000 Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy | 113

Draft Resolution # R090814-07 Page 1 of 1

At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Bedford, Virginia held at the Bedford County Administration Building on the 8th day of September, 2014, beginning at 7:30 p.m.:

1 A RESOLUTION 2 3 ENDORSING A REGIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN 4 FOR THE AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY ECONOMY IN VIRGINIA’S REGION 2000 5 6 7 WHEREAS, the localities of Region 2000 are committed to thinking strategically about how 8 they can better support and integrate agriculture and forestry-based industries into their community’s 9 overall economic development efforts, and 10 11 WHEREAS, the Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy in Virginia’s Region 12 2000 (hereinafter the Plan) is the result of a collaboration between Region 2000 localities and represents 13 collective input from their localities' staff and citizenry; and 14 15 WHEREAS, the Plan represents completion of the planning process funded in part by Virginia’s 16 Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services “Agriculture and Forestry Industries Development 17 (AFID) grant program, and 18 19 WHEREAS, the Plan is regional in scope and provides immediate and long-term action items to 20 facilitate support and integration of agriculture and forestry-based industries into the overall economic 21 development efforts in Region 2000 communities; 22 23 24 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Bedford County Board of Supervisors that the 25 Board does hereby endorse the Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy in Virginia’s 26 Region 2000.

BOARD MEETING 1

AGENDA BEDFORD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

BEDFORD COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING SEPTEMBER 8, 2014

7:30 P.M. WELCOME a. Moment of Silence b. Pledge of Allegiance (1) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (2) FIFTEEN MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD • John Templeton (3) APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA a. Consideration of a request from the Sheriff’s Office for approval to accept the Bureau of Justice Assistance Bulletproof Vest Program Grant; approval of a Supplemental Appropriation and subsequent Departmental Transfer in the amount of $6,149.98 (the 50% local match is included in the FY 2014-15 adopted budget). (Resolution #R090814-01) b. Consideration of a request from the Sheriff’s Office for approval to accept the DMV Selective Enforcement Alcohol Grant, and for a Supplemental Appropriation in the amount of $16,393.00. (Resolution #R090814-02) c. Consideration of a request from the Sheriff’s Office for approval to accept the DMV Selective Enforcement Speed Grant , and for a Supplemental Appropriation in the amount of $7,400.00 (Resolution #R09814-3) (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES – August 11, 2014

(5) PUBLIC HEARINGS / PUBLIC APPEARANCES a. Public Appearance – Andy Dooley, Bedford Moose Lodge Administrator, with a request for funding for the July 4th, 2015 fireworks display. b. Public Hearing – Consideration of Rezoning Application #RZ140006 for Constantine Rosko. (Ordinance #O 090814-04) • Staff Presentation: Brad Robinson, Planner

(6) ACTION ITEMS a. Consideration of a request from the Department of Fiscal Management to establish the Personal Property Tax Relief Rate. (R090814-05) • Staff Presentation: Susan Crawford, Fiscal Management Director b. Consideration of Resolution Endorsing Bedford Town Council's Resolution of July 22 Concerning a Passenger Rail Stop within Town of Bedford. (Resolution #R090814-06) • Staff Presentation: Mark K. Reeter, County Administrator (7) BOARD COMMENTS, COMMITTEE REPORTS, REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS a. Bedford County Treasurer’s annual report. b. Planning Commission meeting minutes from June 17, July 8 and August 5, 2014. c. Bedford Regional Water Authority meeting minutes from July 15, 2014. d. Community Development’s Building Report from July 2014. e. Tri-County Lakes Administrative Commission, Environmental Committee, meeting minutes from May 27, 2014. f. Tri-County Lakes Administrative Commission meeting minutes from July 8, 2014. g. Bedford Communications Report from July 2014. (8) APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES a. Reminder – An Appointment is needed for the Recreation Advisory Board for District 5. (9) COUNTY ATTORNEY REPORTS, REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (10) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORTS, REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS a. Request for Board Guidance Concerning Proposed Tourism Strategic Plan. b. Discussion regarding State Revenue Shortfall. c. Bedford County 2015 General Assembly Session Legislative Issues. d. Request by Town of Bedford for Informal Joint Meeting th th (11) PENDING MATTERS – VACo Conference Attendance (November 9 and 10 ) (12) UPCOMING MEETINGS • September 22nd – Regular Meeting at 7:30 p.m. • October 14th (Tuesday) – Joint Meeting with Economic Development Authority at 5:00 p.m. (Ground Floor Meeting Room); Regular Meeting at 7:30 p.m. (Boardroom) • October 27th – Regular Meeting at 7:30 p.m. 2 3 3a

M E M O R A N D U M

TO: Board of Supervisors

THROUGH: Mark Reeter, County Administrator

FROM: Petrina E. Grubbs, Financial Analyst

DATE: August 21, 2014

SUBJECT: Bulletproof Vest Program Grant Acceptance for the Sheriff’s Office

Bedford County has received notification from the Bureau of Justice Assistance that the Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant Act application has been approved for federal funding in the amount of $12,299.96. Localities are still expected to provide 50% of the cost of the vests. The required local funds for these vests are included in the FY 2014-2015 adopted budget for Department 3120, Sheriff. The Sheriff, Mike Brown, is requesting that the Board of Supervisors accept the Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant, approve a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $6,149.98, and authorize a Departmental Transfer of $6,149.98 from the Sheriff’s department to the Sheriff’s grant department for FY 2014-2015.

This supplemental appropriation request is in accordance with the Board’s supplemental appropriation policy.

If the Board concurs, the following motion is in order.

1 Resolution #R090814-01 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Bedford, Virginia held at the Bedford 9 County Administration Building on the 8th day of September , 2014, beginning at 7:30 p.m.: 10 11 A RESOLUTION 12 ACCEPTANCE OF THE BULLETPROOF VEST GRANT 13 14 WHEREAS, the Bedford County Sheriff’s Office has received a Bulletproof Vest Grant 15 award in the amount of $12,299.96 from the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice 16 Assistance; and 17 18 WHEREAS the grant will provide $6,149.98 to purchase bulletproof vests; and 19 20 WHEREAS, the Sheriff’s Office expects to expend all of the grant in FY 2014-2015 and 21 the revenue and expenditure was not included in the adopted budget for FY 2014-2015; and 22 23 WHEREAS, the grant requires all recipients to provide 50% of the cost of the vests and 24 these local funds are included in the adopted budget for the Sheriff for FY 2014-2015: 25 26 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Bedford County Board of Supervisors that the 27 Board does hereby accept the Bulletproof Vest Grant in the amount of $12,299.96 and authorize a 28 Supplemental Appropriation in the amount of $6,149.98 to the FY 2014-2015 Sheriff’s Grants 29 budget, Department 3129. 30 31 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Bedford County Board of Supervisors authorize a 32 departmental transfer of the local match in the amount of $6,149.98 from the FY 2014-2015 33 Sheriff’s budget to the FY 2014-2015 Sheriff’s Grants budget, department 3129 34 35

M E M O R A N D U M

TO: Board of Supervisors

THROUGH: Mark Reeter, County Administrator

FROM: Petrina E. Grubbs, Financial Analyst

DATE: August 13, 2014

SUBJECT: DMV Selective Enforcement - Alcohol Grant for the Sheriff’s Office

The Department of Motor Vehicles has awarded Bedford County a grant in the amount of $23,393.00 to enforce speed and DUI regulations within the County in an effort to reduce crashes and ensure safety. The grant award period is from 10/1/14 to 9/30/15. The grant requires a local match of 50%, which may be satisfied by using the cost of fuel and vehicle maintenance included in the FY 2014-15 adopted budget. The award of $23,393.00 is to continue funding of overtime for DUI checkpoints and to purchase 4 Also-Sensor units, 1 on-dash camera, and 2 radar units. The Sheriff’s office expects to expend $16,393.00 of this grant in FY 2014-15 and the balance of $7,000.00 in FY 2015-16. The Sheriff, Mike Brown, is requesting that the Board of Supervisors accept this award and authorize a Supplemental Appropriation in the amount of $16,393.00 for FY 2014-15.

This supplemental appropriation request is in accordance with the Board’s supplemental appropriation policy.

If the Board concurs, the following motion is in order.

1 Resolution #Reso#R090814-02 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Bedford, Virginia held at the Bedford 9 County Administration Building on the 8th day of September , 2014, beginning at 7:30 p.m.: 10 11 A RESOLUTION 12 SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION OF THE DMV SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT - 13 ALCOHOL GRANT 14 15 WHEREAS, the Bedford County Sheriff’s Office has received a DMV Selective 16 Enforcement – Alcohol Grant award in the amount of $23,393.00 from the Virginia Department 17 of Motor Vehicles; and 18 19 WHEREAS, the grant will provide $23,393.00 for officer overtime for numerous 20 checkpoints from October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015 and the purchase of 4 Alco-Sensor 21 units, 1 on-dash camera, and 2 radar units; and 22 23 WHEREAS, the Sheriff’s Office expects to spend $16,393.00 of the grant in FY 2014-2015 24 and the balance in FY 2015-2016; and 25 26 WHEREAS, the grant requires a 50% local in-kind match which will be met by using the 27 cost of fuel and vehicle maintenance included in the FY 2014-2015 adopted budget; and 28 29 WHEREAS, this amount was not included in the revenue and expenditure for FY 2014- 30 2015 budget for the Sheriff’s office grants 31 32 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Bedford County Board of Supervisors that the 33 Board does hereby accept the DMV Selective Enforcement – Alcohol Grant in the amount of 34 $23,393.00 and authorize a Supplemental Appropriation in the amount of $16,393.00 to the FY 35 2014-2015 Sheriff’s Grants budget, Department 3129. 36 37 38

M E M O R A N D U M

TO: Board of Supervisors

THROUGH: Mark Reeter, County Administrator

FROM: Petrina E. Grubbs, Financial Analyst

DATE: August 12, 2014

SUBJECT: DMV Selective Enforcement – Speed Grant for the Sheriff’s Office

The Department of Motor Vehicles has awarded Bedford County a grant in the amount of $10,400.00 to enforce safety within the County in an effort to reduce crashes and ensure safety. The grant award period is from 10/1/14 to 9/30/15. The grant requires a local match of 50%, which may be satisfied by using the cost of fuel and vehicle maintenance included in the FY 2014-15 adopted budget. The award of $10,400.00 is to continue funding of overtime for DUI checkpoints. The Sheriff’s office expects to expend $7,400.00 of this grant in FY 2014-15 and the balance in FY 2015-16. The Sheriff, Mike Brown, is requesting that the Board of Supervisors accept this award and authorize a Supplemental Appropriation in the amount of $7,400.00 for FY 2014-15.

This supplemental appropriation request is in accordance with the Board’s supplemental appropriation policy.

If the Board concurs, the following motion is in order.

1 Resolution #R090814-03 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Bedford, Virginia held at the Bedford 9 County Administration Building on the 8th day of September , 2014, beginning at 7:30 p.m.: 10 11 A RESOLUTION 12 SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION OF THE DMV SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT - SPEED 13 GRANT 14 15 WHEREAS, the Bedford County Sheriff’s Office has received a DMV Selective 16 Enforcement – Speed Grant award in the amount of $10,400.00 from the Virginia Department of 17 Motor Vehicles; and 18 19 WHEREAS, the grant will provide $10,400.00 for officer overtime for numerous 20 checkpoints from October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015; and 21 22 WHEREAS, the Sheriff’s Office expects to spend $7,400.00 of this grant in FY 2014-2015 23 and the balance in FY 2015-2016; and 24 25 WHEREAS, the grant requires a 50% local in-kind match which will be met by using the 26 cost of fuel and vehicle maintenance included in the FY 2014-2015 adopted budget; and 27 28 WHEREAS, this amount was not included in the revenue and expenditure for FY 2014- 29 2015 budget for the Sheriff’s office grants 30 31 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Bedford County Board of Supervisors that the 32 Board does hereby accept the DMV Selective Enforcement – Speed Grant in the amount of 33 $10,400.00 and authorize a Supplemental Appropriation in the amount of $7,400.00 to the FY 34 2014-2015 Sheriff’s Grants budget, Department 3129. 35 36 37

4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MINUTES

8 BEDFORD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

9 BEDFORD COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 10 AUGUST 11, 2014 11 12 7:30 P.M. WELCOME 13 a. Moment of Silence 14 b. Pledge of Allegiance 15 (1) APPROVAL OF AGENDA 16 (2) FIFTEEN MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD 17 (3) APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA 18 a. Consideration of a request from the Department of Fire and Rescue for 19 acceptance of the Office of Emergency Medical Services Financial Assistance 20 Grant in the amount of $36,905.78; matching funds will come from CIP – 21 Emergency Apparatus. (Resolution #R081114-01) 22 b. Consideration of a request from the Department of Fiscal Management to re- 23 appropriate unexpended grant funds and donations. (Resolution #R081114-02) 24 c. Consideration of a request from the Sheriff’s Office for a Supplemental 25 Appropriation in the amount of $363,000.00, which represents State funds 26 from the Internet Crimes Against Children program; no local match is required. 27 (Resolution #R081114-03) 28 d. Consideration of a request from the Sheriff’s Office for a Supplemental 29 Appropriation in the amount of $391,600.00 from an Internet Crimes Against 30 Children grant; no local match is required. (Resolution #R081114-04) 31 e. Consideration of a request from the Domestic Violence Program for a 32 Supplemental Appropriation in the amount of $33,485.00 from increased 33 funding from the Commonwealth of Virginia’s Department of Social Services. 34 These funds will be used to convert a part-time position to a full-time position 35 with benefits, training, supplies, etc. (Resolution #R081114-05) 36 (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES – June 23, July 14 and July 28, 2014 DRAFT - Board of Supervisor’s Meeting Minutes August 11th, 2014 Page 1 of 11

37 (5) PUBLIC HEARINGS / PUBLIC APPEARANCES 38 a. Public Appearance – Zack Olinger, Virginia Department of Forestry, with a 39 check presentation for the Board of Supervisors. 40 (6) ACTION ITEMS 41 a. Consideration of a request from the Department of Fiscal Management for 42 authorization of the re-appropriation of Fiscal Year 2013-14 funds into Fiscal 43 Year 2014-15. (Resolution #R081114-06) 44 • Staff Presentation: Susan Crawford, Director of Fiscal Management 45 b. Consideration of a request to authorize the execution of an easement agreement 46 with Lumos Networks, Inc. (Resolution #R081114-07) 47 • Staff Presentation: Carl Boggess, County Attorney 48 c. Recommendations Concerning County Human Resources and Information 49 Technology Operations (Resolution #R081114-08) 50 • Staff Presentation: Mark K. Reeter, County Administrator 51 d. Consideration of a request from the County Attorney’s Office to enter into a 52 permanent Pump and Haul Agreement with the State Health Commissioner. 53 (Resolution #R081114-09) 54 • Staff Presentation: Carl Boggess, County Attorney 55 (7) BOARD COMMENTS, COMMITTEE REPORTS, REQUESTS AND 56 RECOMMENDATIONS 57 (8) APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES 58 a. Reminder - Appointment is needed for the Recreation Advisory Board for 59 District 5. 60 b. Replacement Appointment to the TLAC 61 (9) COUNTY ATTORNEY REPORTS, REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 62 (10) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORTS, REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 63 a. Vacancy in position of County Director of Tourism 64 (11) PENDING MATTERS 65 (12) UPCOMING MEETINGS th 66 • CANCELLED – Regular Meeting on August 25 67 • September 8th – Regular Meeting at 7:30 p.m. (work session from 5:00 to 6:45 68 p.m.) 69 • September 22nd – Regular Meeting at 7:30 p.m. 70 71 72 DRAFT - Board of Supervisor’s Meeting Minutes August 11th, 2014 Page 2 of 11

73 7:30 P.M. – REGULAR MEETING 74 Board of Supervisors: John Sharp, Chairman – District 4; Tammy Parker, Vice-Chairman, District 7; 75 Bill Thomasson, District 1; Curry Martin, District 2; and Annie Pollard, District 6 76 Absent: Steve Wilkerson, District 3 and Steve Arrington, District 5 77 78 Staff Present: Mark K. Reeter, Carl Boggess, Frank Rogers, Susan Crawford and Brigitte Luckett 79 80 Chairman Sharp called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance; a moment of 81 silence was held and the Pledge of Allegiance was said. 82 83 (1) APPROVAL OF AGENDA 84 Mr. Mark Reeter, County Administrator, noted the changes to the agenda as follows: 85 • Additional Documentation: Agenda Item #4 – Minutes from July 14 and July 28, 2014 86 • Additional Documentation: Agenda Item #6d – Supporting Documentation which was 87 inadvertently left out of the agenda packet. 88 • Addition: Agenda Item #8b – Application for Replacement Appointment to the Tri-County 89 Lakes Administrative Committee. 90 Chairman Sharp noted that Supervisors Arrington and Wilkerson would not be in attendance this 91 evening. Supervisor Thomasson added that he would have an appointment for the Broadband Committee. 92 Supervisors Pollard and Martin stated they would also have items under ‘Board Comments’. 93 Supervisor Thomasson made a motion to approve the agenda; motion passed by 94 acclamation. 95 96 (2) FIFTEEN MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD 97 • Virginia Lynch, citizen from Thaxton, addressed the Board regarding the recent proposal 98 from Region 2000 for a Regional Library. Ms. Lynch said the proposal was vague regarding 99 the benefits to the County, and voiced her concern that higher paying positions would be 100 created while eliminating regular staff. She is also concerned that Christian and Conservative 101 websites will be blocked on library computers in the same manner that pornography sites are 102 currently blocked. 103 • Jack Phillips, citizen from Moneta, addressed the Board regarding the lack of broadband 104 internet in the County. He said it’s important for attracting industry, entertainment, online 105 classes, etc., but the main provider is not running broadband to many parts of the County. 106 Mr. Phillips said satellite companies do not provide the service needed. Comcast has the 107 regional monopoly, but refuses to provide better service; Shentel is eager to provide a better 108 service, but is not allowed in the region without a franchise agreement. DRAFT - Board of Supervisor’s Meeting Minutes August 11th, 2014 Page 3 of 11

109 Attorney Boggess said he would be happy to talk with the representatives from Shentel on 110 this matter. 111 Supervisor Thomasson said this is definitely a problem, and other localities are having 112 trouble with this company installing needed infrastructure. 113 • Jackie Davis, citizen from Thaxton, addressed the Board with a prayer. 114 115 (3) APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA 116 County Administrator Mark Reeter read the consent agenda as follows: 117 a. Consideration of a request from the Department of Fire and Rescue for acceptance of the 118 Office of Emergency Medical Services Financial Assistance Grant in the amount of 119 $36,905.78; matching funds will come from CIP – Emergency Apparatus. (Resolution 120 #R081114-01) 121 b. Consideration of a request from the Department of Fiscal Management to re-appropriate 122 unexpended grant funds and donations. (Resolution #R081114-02) 123 c. Consideration of a request from the Sheriff’s Office for a Supplemental Appropriation in the 124 amount of $363,000.00, which represents State funds from the Internet Crimes Against 125 Children program; no local match is required. (Resolution #R081114-03) 126 d. Consideration of a request from the Sheriff’s Office for a Supplemental Appropriation in the 127 amount of $391,600.00 from an Internet Crimes Against Children grant; no local match is 128 required. (Resolution #R081114-04) 129 e. Consideration of a request from the Domestic Violence Program for a Supplemental 130 Appropriation in the amount of $33,485.00 from increased funding from the Commonwealth 131 of Virginia’s Department of Social Services. These funds will be used to convert a part-time 132 position to a full-time position with benefits, training, supplies, etc. 133 (Resolution #R081114-05) 134 Supervisor Thomasson made a motion to approve the consent agenda. 135 Voting yes: Mr. Thomasson, Mr. Martin, Mr. Sharp, Mrs. Parker and Mrs. Pollard 136 Voting no: None 137 Absent: Mr. Wilkerson and Mr. Arrington 138 Motion passed. 139 140 (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 141 Supervisor Martin made a motion to approve the minutes of June 23, 2014 as presented; 142 motion passed by acclamation; Supervisor Parker abstained. 143 ------

DRAFT - Board of Supervisor’s Meeting Minutes August 11th, 2014 Page 4 of 11

144 Supervisor Thomasson made a motion to approve the minutes of July 14, 2014 as presented; 145 motion passed by acclamation; Chairman Sharp abstained. 146 ------147 Supervisor Pollard made a motion to approve the minutes of July 28, 2014 as corrected; 148 motion passed by acclamation; Chairman Sharp abstained. 149 150 (5) PUBLIC HEARINGS / PUBLIC APPEARANCES 151 (5a) Zack Olinger from the Virginia Department of Forestry presented the Board of Supervisors with a 152 check in the amount of $3,483.18 representing funds from a State Forest in the Huddleston area. Mr. 153 Olinger explained that the check represented 25% of funds earned in the Parks, which are given to the 154 localities where the Parks are located since the localities cannot collect taxes in those Parks. 155 156 (6) Action Items 157 (6a) Director of Fiscal Management Susan Crawford addressed the Board with a request for 158 authorization of the re-appropriations of Fiscal Year 2013-14 funds into Fiscal Year 2014-15. Ms. 159 Crawford reviewed the re-appropriation policy with the Board, noting it is intended to give departments 160 flexibility while ensuring good fiscal management in facilitating the year-end close. She said that the 161 requests total .45% of the Fiscal Year 2013-14 General Fund adopted budget. Ms. Crawford noted that if 162 the Board approves these requests, it will leave an unassigned cash balance at year end of approximately 163 $18.3 million, which is $9.4 million more than the minimum amount required by the Fund Balance Policy 164 adopted by the Board. She clarified that the Electoral Board funds were for training election officers in 165 accordance with State law. 166 Chairman Sharp asked how the funds were distributed to the volunteer fire agencies. Ms. 167 Crawford replied that it is a set amount to each agency, who must turn in invoices showing they have 168 spent that particular amount of money. 169 Supervisor Parker made a motion to approve Resolution #R081114-06. 170 WHEREAS, the Bedford County Board of Supervisors annually receives and reviews requests for 171 re-appropriation of year end funds; and 172 WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2014 recommendations total $400,781.40 or 0.45% of the total 173 adopted FY 14 General Fund Budget; now 174 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does hereby re-appropriate funds 175 as follows: 176 Department: Recommended: 177 County Administration $ 1,500.00 178 Information Technology $ 72,835.00 179 Electoral Board $ 6,000.00

DRAFT - Board of Supervisor’s Meeting Minutes August 11th, 2014 Page 5 of 11

180 Sheriff’s Office $ 5,556.89 181 Fire and Rescue – Fire Division $134,892.32 182 Fire and Rescue – Rescue Division $ 44,743.91 183 Welfare Administration $ 3,725.28 184 Parks and Recreation $ 67,068.00 185 Erosion and Sediment Control $ 1,200.00 186 Storm Water Maintenance $ 63,260.00 187 Voting yes: Mr. Thomasson, Mr. Martin, Mr. Sharp, Mrs. Parker and Mrs. Pollard 188 Voting no: None 189 Absent: Mr. Wilkerson and Mr. Arrington 190 Motion passed. 191 ------192 (6b) County Attorney Carl Boggess addressed the Board with a request to authorize the execution of 193 an easement agreement with Lumos Networks. Attorney Boggess noted that this is a standard utility 194 easement. In response to a question from Supervisor Thomasson, Attorney Boggess stated this request 195 does not have anything to do with the proposed Regional Library; it is simply intended to give faster 196 internet access to the libraries in Forest, Moneta and Big Island. 197 Supervisor Parker made a resolution to approve Resolution #R081114-07. 198 WHEREAS, at the April 1, 2014 meeting of the Library Board of Trustees, the Board approved a 199 recommendation to replace the existing T-1 Internet lines at the Forest, Moneta and Big Island Libraries 200 with high capacity fiber lines, in order to provide a more reliable Internet connection and provide more 201 bandwidth capacity as Internet usage grows at those facilities; and 202 WHEREAS, in order to implement the recommendations at the Forest Library, Lumos Networks, 203 Inc. needs to run underground fiber lines from Route 221 to the library building, resulting in the need of 204 an easement across County owned property; and 205 WHEREAS, similar easements will be needed for Moneta and Big Island library properties. 206 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Bedford County Board of Supervisors, that the 207 Board does hereby authorize the County Administrator to execute a right of way agreement with Lumos 208 Networks, Inc. for the Forest Library site and further authorizes the County Administrator to execute 209 similar easements for the Moneta and Big Island library properties, all of the easements to be in a form 210 approved by the County Attorney. 211 Voting yes: Mr. Thomasson, Mr. Martin, Mr. Sharp, Mrs. Parker and Mrs. Pollard 212 Voting no: None 213 Absent: Mr. Wilkerson and Mr. Arrington 214 Motion passed. 215 ------

DRAFT - Board of Supervisor’s Meeting Minutes August 11th, 2014 Page 6 of 11

216 (6c) County Administrator Mark Reeter addressed the Board with recommendations concerning 217 positions in the Human Resources and Information Technology Departments. Mr. Reeter reviewed the 218 process that led to this evening’s request, and summarized the request as given in the resolution below. 219 Supervisor Thomasson made a motion to approve Resolution #R081114-08. 220 WHEREAS, the Office of County Administrator has brought forth a number of recommendations 221 with respect to County Human Resources and Information Technology operations pertaining to re- 222 organization, changes to position titles and Pay Grades, and compensation adjustments, and 223 WHEREAS, these recommendations have been reviewed and endorsed by the County Personnel 224 Committee and submitted for approval by the Board of Supervisors;

225 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Bedford County Board of Supervisors that the 226 Board does hereby approve the following: 227 1. Re-assignment of the current Human Resources Manager and supporting positions currently 228 assigned to the County Department of Management Services to the County Department of 229 Administration as a Division of Human Resources; adjustment of the current Pay Grade of the 230 Human Resources Manager position from 22 to 25, and approval of an initial new starting salary 231 for the position between $55,000 and $75,000. 232 2. Designation of current County information technology (IT) operations and personnel as a 233 County Department of Information Technology, with re-titling of the current IT Manager position 234 as a Director of Information Technology and adjusting the Pay Grade of that position from 23 to 235 26. 236 3. Authorize creation of a new Desktop/Web Support Specialist position with the Department of 237 IT at Pay Grade 14 with an initial starting salary range between $38,000 and $42,000. 238 4. Re-titling (as determined by the County Administrator) and adjusting of the current LAN 239 Administrator position's Pay Grade from 18 to 23; re-titling the current IT Specialist position as 240 Public Safety LAN Administrator with a Pay Grade adjustment from 13 to 18, and adjusting the 241 Pay Grade of the IT Technician position from 10 to 14. 242 5. Adjusting the current compensation of the Director of IT, current LAN Administrator and 243 Public Safety LAN Administrator positions by $5,000 each effective August 1, 2014. 244 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Board directs that the positions of Human Resources Manager, 245 Desktop/Web Support Specialist and IT Technician be filled as soon as practical. 246 Voting yes: Mr. Thomasson, Mr. Martin, Mr. Sharp, Mrs. Parker and Mrs. Pollard 247 Voting no: None 248 Absent: Mr. Wilkerson and Mr. Arrington 249 Motion passed. 250 ------

DRAFT - Board of Supervisor’s Meeting Minutes August 11th, 2014 Page 7 of 11

251 (6d) County Attorney Carl Boggess addressed the Board with a request to enter into a permanent 252 Pump and Haul Agreement with the State Health Commissioner. Attorney Boggess reviewed the process 253 that led to this request, noting that he has been informed by the State that at least one project needed to be 254 on this application when submitted. He said that by approving this resolution the Board is agreeing to (1) 255 submit to the State Health Commissioner a revised pump and haul agreement that does in fact reference a 256 project; and (2) allow the County Administrator to enter into an agreement with the local health 257 department for pump and haul for the property owned by the Blankenships (which will be the project 258 referenced on the state application). He stated that the agreement with the Blankenships will include an 259 escrow amount which will be decided on by the Board. Lastly, the local agreement should clarify that the 260 property owners will notify the County if there are any issues. He also suggested that when revisions to 261 the water and sewer ordinance are made in the near future that an article be added dealing with pump and 262 haul. 263 There followed a discussion between Attorney Boggess and members of the Board clarifying how 264 the process would work for pump and haul agreements in the future. Attorney Boggess explained how a 265 pump and haul system worked, noting that it would likely need to be pumped every 14 days by the owner 266 and would cost approximately $300-$500 each time it is pumped out. The consequences of not pumping 267 it out as needed could be significant, which is why he is recommending an escrow of $2,500.00. 268 Supervisor Thomasson asked if the owners were aware of these issues before purchasing the 269 property. Attorney Boggess said they were told that the only option would be a permanent pump and haul 270 because of the lack of a permitted system. He said the closing attorney did give them full and complete 271 disclosure of the implications if they closed on the property without a septic system. 272 In response to a question from Supervisor Martin, Attorney Boggess stated that the County is not 273 responsible for the installation, etc., of the system for the Blankenships. 274 The discussion continued, with the Board agreeing to an escrow amount of $2,500.00. 275 Supervisor Pollard made a motion to approve Resolution #R081114-09, amended with an 276 added escrow of $2,500.00. 277 Supervisor Martin asked if this agreement would only be binding with the current property 278 owner; Attorney Boggess responded in the affirmative. 279 Chairman Sharp asked why the agreement would not be conveyed from the current owner if they 280 sold the property. Attorney Boggess said that a pump and haul system is not like a regular system that is 281 in the ground or connected to a line, so it is not considered ‘infrastructure’. The agreement is only with 282 the current owner. 283 Supervisor Thomasson asked who was going to police this if the property is sold. Attorney 284 Boggess said the County would require a new agreement with the new owner when the new sale is 285 recorded. 286 Supervisor Pollard said there was a motion on the floor and called for the question.

DRAFT - Board of Supervisor’s Meeting Minutes August 11th, 2014 Page 8 of 11

287 WHEREAS, from time to time it is possible for septic systems to fail for County residents and 288 businesses; and 289 WHEREAS, the State Health Commissioner will only grant a permanent pump and haul 290 agreements to a locality; and 291 WHEREAS, the County cannot enter into agreements with its citizens for pump and haul services 292 until a pump and haul agreement is in place with the Commonwealth of Virginia, through the State Health 293 Commissioner; and 294 WHEREAS, County citizens, Jason and Wendy Blankenship are requesting pump and haul 295 services. 296 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Bedford County Board of Supervisors, that the 297 Board does hereby authorize the County Administrator, with the assistance of the County Attorney, to 298 enter into a Permanent Pump and Haul Agreement and General Permit with the State Health 299 Commissioner pursuant to Part IV, Article 4 §12 VAC 5-610-598 et. seq. of the State Board of Health 300 Sewage Handling and Disposal Regulations; the County Administrator is authorized to execute the 301 aforesaid Agreement. Further, County Administrator, with the assistance of the County Attorney, is 302 authorized to enter into a pump and haul agreement with Jason and Wendy Blankenship upon the 303 placement in escrow of a sufficient sum of money to protect and hold the County harmless. A zoning 304 permit for the property in question shall not be issued until the agreements are signed, the monies are 305 placed in escrow, the system is designed by a licensed engineer and the facilities are constructed by an 306 approved and licensed contractor. 307 Voting yes: Mr. Martin, Mrs. Parker and Mrs. Pollard 308 Voting no: Mr. Thomasson and Mr. Sharp 309 Absent: Mr. Wilkerson and Mr. Arrington 310 Motion passed. 311 312 (7) BOARD COMMENTS, COMMITTEE REPORTS, REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 313 Supervisor Pollard stated that when the Board Retreat was held back in January, the Board agreed 314 to give themselves a raise. She said the Board has not had a raise in forty years, and are not compensated 315 for the work they do; it’s a 24/7 job. She requested consensus from the Board to hold the requisite public 316 hearing regarding raises for the Board. 317 Supervisor Thomasson said he means no disrespect to any of the Board members, and he agrees 318 that they work very hard. However, he could not support even so much as a consensus for a public 319 hearing on Board raises at this time. He said taxes were just raised in the County, and aside from the 3% 320 raise last August, employees have not had a raise in many years. Supervisor Thomasson asked how the 321 Board could vote for a pay increase for themselves when they just implemented for a tax increase and

DRAFT - Board of Supervisor’s Meeting Minutes August 11th, 2014 Page 9 of 11

322 didn’t give employees raises. He said he did not think it was a good use of funds to give the Board 323 members raises. 324 Supervisor Pollard said the Board has paid for the increases in retirement and benefits in past 325 years, and while this may not be the same as take-home pay it is an increase in pay. She said she 326 understands that some employees may be getting paid below their pay scale, but there are others being 327 paid above their pay scale and this is something administration needs to take a look at. She said a raise 328 would not benefit her a great deal, but she is thinking about the next people coming on the Board. She 329 said not everyone will be able to just buy their way onto the Board; it takes a lot to run for the office 330 itself. Supervisor Pollard said the Supervisors take a lot of flak, and it’s a big risk. She said that 331 surrounding counties make more; that a county in South Carolina has a lot fewer people and make a 332 salary in the teens; and that Roanoke County Supervisors were making $14,000 three years ago. 333 Supervisor Martin said he was always in favor of public hearings on Board decisions, and stated 334 that it was always a good idea to get public input before making decisions that affect the County. He said 335 the people of Bedford County should have their say. 336 Supervisor Parker gave her consensus for moving forward with a public hearing at the first 337 meeting in September. 338 ------339 Supervisor Martin said he had intended to speak about broadband needs this evening, but changed 340 his mind in light of the fact that this was already discussed during the Citizen Comment Period earlier this 341 evening. 342 There followed a brief discussion between members of the Board regarding the importance of 343 broadband expansion in the County. Supervisor Pollard said it was her understanding that the Broadband 344 Advisory Committee had some kind of recommendation or report, but she has never seen it. Mr. Reeter 345 noted that since the recent passing of one of its members, the Committee has not met; Supervisor 346 Thomasson has an appointment this evening to fill that vacancy on the Committee. Supervisor Pollard 347 said that the report that she hadn’t seen was done before Mr. Schikling passed away. Mr. Rogers 348 reviewed the work of the Committee to date, clarifying that there was not in fact a report for the Board. 349 There have been lots of discussion on the options available to the County, but nothing has been distilled 350 into a report yet for the Board. This will be brought forward once the Committee is back in motion 351 following the appointment of a new member. 352 353 (8) APPOINTMENTS TO BOARD, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES 354 (8a) Supervisor Thomasson made a motion to appoint Teresa Lorraine Morris to serve on the 355 Tri-County Lake Commission; motion passed by acclamation. 356 ------

DRAFT - Board of Supervisor’s Meeting Minutes August 11th, 2014 Page 10 of 11

357 Supervisor Thomasson made a motion to appoint Lee Walker to serve on the Broadband 358 advisory Board; motion passed by acclamation. 359 360 (9) COUNTY ATTORNEY’S REPORTS, REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS – nothing to report 361 362 (10) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORTS, REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 363 (10a) County Administrator Mark Reeter addressed the Board with a request for direction on the vacant 364 County Director of Tourism position. He reminded the Board of the recent presentation they were given 365 by Prototype: Tourism, and asked if they wanted to move ahead with filling this position, or if they would 366 rather hire a consulting firm to map out a tourism strategy first. After a brief discussion, it was the 367 consensus of the Board to move forward with filling the position of the Tourism Director first, and work 368 on a strategic plan at a later date. Chairman Sharp noted that he would have rather waited to make a 369 decision on this until Supervisors Arrington and Wilkerson were present. 370 371 (11) PENDING MATTERS 372 373 (12) UPCOMING MEETINGS 374 Chairman Sharp noted the Board’s upcoming meetings: CANCELLED – Regular Meeting on August 375 25th; September 8th – Regular Meeting at 7:30 p.m. (work session from 5:00 to 6:45 p.m.); September 22nd – 376 Regular Meeting at 7:30 p.m. 377 378 Supervisor Thomasson made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:45 p.m.; motion passed by 379 acclamation.

DRAFT - Board of Supervisor’s Meeting Minutes August 11th, 2014 Page 11 of 11

5 5a Mark Reeter

From: Andy Dooley [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 3:05 PM To: Mark Reeter Subject: FIREWORKS UPDATE

Mr. Reeter As you know the Bedford Moose Lodge along with other community partners and businesses are in the process of planning the 4th of July fireworks display. I am requesting to be placed on the September 8 agenda to speak to the Board and update them on the status and request the County support Respectfully submitted Andy Dooley Fireworks Committee Chairman

1 5b

CCCOOOUUUNNNTTTYYY OOOFFF BBBEEEDDDFFFOOORRRDDD,,, VVVIIIRRRGGGIIINNNIIIAAA TIMOTHY L. WILSON COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING DIRECTOR 122 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE G-03

BEDFORD, VIRGINIA 24523 ______

D EPARTMENT OF C OMMUNITY D EVELOPMENT D IVISION OF P LANNING

M E M O R A N D U M

TO: Board of Supervisors

THROUGH: Mark K. Reeter, County Administrator

FROM: Brad Robinson, CZA, Planner

DATE: August 26, 2014

SUBJECT: Rezoning Application #RZ140006: Constantine Rosko – Proffer Amendment

Attached for your consideration is a request from Constantine Rosko to amend proffered conditions of Tax Map 114-A-82. The parcel is located along Forest Road (Route 221) approximately 0.1 miles north/east of the intersection with Bellevue Road (Route 643) and is a total of 72.67 acres according to county real estate information. The parcel was formerly split-zoned AV (Agricultural Village Center District) and AR (Agricultural/Residential District) but rezoned to be entirely AV with proffers (termed “conditional zoning”) on February 14, 2005 through rezoning application #RZ050002. Mr. Rosko was also the property owner/applicant at that time and offered the existing proffers as part of the 2005 rezoning approval.

The current request (which per the applicant has been submitted due to a change in market conditions) would result in only two of the existing eight proffers being applied towards a proposed second phase which has yet to commence. The first phase named “Bellevue Terrace” has been platted and consists of 12 lots located along Bellevue Road (Route 643). Existing proffers include:

1. The property will be developed in substantial conformance with the submitted rezoning plan, revision dated November 15, 2004, as prepared by Perkins & Orrison, Inc.

2. Uses for the proposed lots shall be limited to single family residential dwellings and residential accessory uses/structures.

3. No home shall be permitted to be constructed on any lot that contains less than 3,000 square feet of finished living space for a two story house, or 2,500 square feet for a one story house.

______

540-586-7616 -TELEPHONE 540-586-2059 -TELEFACSIMILE [email protected] - E-MAIL www.bedfordcountyva.gov CCCOOOUUUNNNTTTYYY OOOFFF BBBEEEDDDFFFOOORRRDDD,,, VVVIIIRRRGGGIIINNNIIIAAA ______

D EPARTMENT OF C OMMUNITY D EVELOPMENT D IVISION OF P LANNING Page 2

shall be no exposed concrete CMU foundations. Homes shall be of a generally traditional appearance, in keeping with other finer homes in the area.

5. Along the Bellevue Road lots, the developer agrees to dedicate public right-of-way extending 25 feet from the centerline.

6. The project will be developed in two phases: The first being the 12 lots along Bellevue Road, and the second being lots accessed off of Route 221 (not including the Trivium house).

7. A right turn lane and taper will be constructed on Route 221 at the proposed entrance.

8. Along the southern and eastern boundaries of the rezoned lots, a 50-foot buffer will remain undisturbed. If disturbance is required, then a double row of evergreen trees, 12-foot on center, 6 feet fall at planting, shall be installed along or near the property line for the entire length of the disturbed area.

Proffers 2 and 8 above regarding use of the property only for single-family dwellings and a buffer requirement are proposed to remain in place for the second phase. The zoning of the property would no longer stipulate the size of dwellings or type of construction materials (Proffers 3 and 4). All existing eight proffers will remain in place for the first phase which has been developed.

The Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 5, 2014 and recommended approval by a vote of 6-1. One citizen spoke during the public hearing with questions about the number of homes that could potentially be built on the property.

An adjoining property owner, Brook Hill Farms, mailed material dated July 28, 2014 to all members of the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors prior to the Planning Commission’s August 5 public hearing. The correspondence noted the subject property’s location within the “Bellevue Rural Historic District”. Staff confirmed this district’s existence and listing on state and national historic registers – however the property is not locally designated as historic by the County through the Historic Overlay (HO) District.

Attachments: Draft Ordinance Planning Commission Staff Report

1 Ordinance #O 090814-04 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Bedford, Virginia held at the Bedford 9 County Administration Building on the 8th day of September, 2014, beginning at 7:30 p.m.: 10 11 AN ORDINANCE 12 TO AMEND AND READOPT THE BEDFORD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE 13 BY AMENDING PROFFERED CONDITIONS OF PROPERTY IDENTIFIED 14 AS TM#114-A-82 15 16 WHEREAS, Constantine Rosko has submitted rezoning application #RZ140006 to amend 17 proffered conditions of Tax Map Number 114-A-82; and

18 WHEREAS, the existing proffered conditions were approved with rezoning application 19 #RZ050002 on February 14, 2005 which rezoned the subject property to Conditional AV 20 (Agricultural Village Center District); and

21 WHEREAS, the application requests to remove all existing proffers except Numbers 2 and 8 22 from a proposed second phase of development to be known as Trivium Oaks; and

23 WHEREAS, all existing proffered conditions will remain in effect for the first phase known as 24 Bellevue Terrace which has already been platted and recorded; and

25 WHEREAS, the application has been submitted pursuant to Section 30-15 of the Zoning 26 Ordinance; and

27 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has carefully considered the public record, the public 28 testimony, and the recommendation of the Planning Commission; and

29 WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the requested amendment meets the goals and 30 objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance; and

31 WHEREAS, the Board finds that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good 32 zoning practice requires adoption of an ordinance to amend the conditions of the subject 33 property; and

34 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Bedford County Board of Supervisors on this 35 the 8th day of September, 2014, that the Bedford County Zoning Ordinance be and it hereby 36 is amended and readopted by amending the proffered conditions for property identified as 37 TM #114-A-82 to contain the following:

38 1. Uses for the property shall be limited to single family residential dwellings and 39 residential accessory uses/structures. 40 2. Along the southern and eastern boundaries of the rezoned property, a 50’ buffer 41 will remain undisturbed. If disturbance is required, then a double row of 42 evergreen trees, 12’ on center, 6’ tall at planting, shall be installed along or near 43 the property line for the entire length of the disturbed area.

44 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that should any portion or provision of this 45 ordinance be held by any court to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision shall not affect 46 the validity of the ordinance as a whole, or any part of the ordinance other than the part held 47 to be unconstitutional or invalid.

MEMORANDUM

TO: Planning Commission

FROM: Brad Robinson, CZA, Planner

DATE: July 18, 2014

SUBJECT: Rezoning Application #RZ140006: Constantine Rosko

SYNOPSIS

Constantine Rosko is requesting to amend proffers associated with phased development of Tax Map 114-A-82. The request would result in the removal of three proffers as applied to the second phase.

BACKGROUND

APPLICANT/OWNER The applicant and property owner is Constantine Rosko, 48 Old Trail Road, Watermill, NY 11976.

AGENT/ENGINEER The agent and engineer for the applicant is Russell H. Orrison of Perkins & Orrison, 17 West Nelson Street, Lexington, VA 24450.

LOCATION The subject parcel is identified as Tax Map 114-A-82 and located along the south side of Forest Road (Route 221) approximately 0.1 miles north/east of the intersection with Bellevue Road (Route 643). The parcel is a total of 72.67 acres according to county real estate information.

PROPOSED CHANGE Tax Map 114-A-82 is currently zoned entirely AV as a result of rezoning application #RZ050002 in 2005. Prior to 2005 the property was split-zoned AV and AR (Agricultural/Residential District). Proffers were approved with the previous rezoning request, which included the following:

1. The property will be developed in substantial conformance with the submitted rezoning plan, revision dated November 15, 2004, as prepared by Perkins & Orrison, Inc.

2. Uses for the proposed lots shall be limited to single family residential dwellings and residential accessory uses/structures.

RZ140006 Staff Report Page 1 of 8

3. No home shall be permitted to be constructed on any lot that contains less than 3,000 square feet of finished living space for a two story house, or 2,500 square feet for a one story house.

4. Architectural standards for all homes and accessory structures are to be primarily brick or stone, with Hardi Plank or similar cement fiber siding product covering less than half of the building exterior. Architectural grade shingle or better roof material must be used. There shall be no exposed concrete CMU foundations. Homes shall be of a generally traditional appearance, in keeping with other finer homes in the area.

5. Along the Bellevue Road lots, the developer agrees to dedicate public right-of-way extending 25 feet from the centerline.

6. The project will be developed in two phases: The first being the 12 lots along Bellevue Road, and the second being lots accessed off of Route 221 (not including the Trivium house).

7. A right turn lane and taper will be constructed on Route 221 at the proposed entrance.

8. Along the southern and eastern boundaries of the rezoned lots, a 50-foot buffer will remain undisturbed. If disturbance is required, then a double row of evergreen trees, 12- foot on center, 6 feet fall at planting, shall be installed along or near the property line for the entire length of the disturbed area.

RZ050002 approved a total of 42 lots among two phases as stated in Proffer #6 above. The first phase named “Bellevue Terrace” has been platted and consists of 12 lots located along Bellevue Road (Route 643). The second phase, which has not commenced, is to be known as “Trivium Oaks” and is currently approved for 30 lots based on the rezoning plan.

Due to a change in market conditions, the applicant is requesting to remove Proffers 1, 3 and 4 as listed above from the second phase. If approved, the zoning of the property would no longer stipulate the size of dwellings or type construction materials (Proffers 3 & 4). Proffers 2 and 8 would remain in effect which would continue to limit the use of the property to single-family dwellings and require a buffer along the eastern and southern property lines. Proffer 5 was unique to the first phase and has been completed. A revised proffer statement (attached) was provided by the applicant on June 24.

Staff notes what is considered the first phase, “Bellevue Terrace”, was already platted and recorded prior to the 2005 rezoning. These lots were originally a part of the subject parcel (Tax Map 114-A-82) but were subdivided off in 2003. Furthermore, this phase originally consisted of 17 lots but was reconfigured in 2004 and 2008 into the current 12 lots.

A preliminary plan for the second phase, “Trivium Oaks”, was also approved in 2003 for the remainder of Tax Map 114-A-82. A total of 36 lots were approved based on the AV and AR split-zoning at the time. Rezoning RZ050002 allowed a reconfiguration of the 36 lots into 30 lots as a result of the entire tract becoming zoned AV.

RZ140006 Staff Report Page 2 of 8

ANALYSIS

Zoning/Land Use Compatibility Tax Map 114-A-82 is zoned Conditional AV and is currently wooded and undeveloped. AR (Agricultural/Residential District) zoning adjoins the parcel to the north and east while AV zoning is located to the west. The AV zoning in the area is part of a larger AV hub centered around the intersection of Forest Road (Route 221) with Goode Road and Goode Station Road (both Route 668). The subject property also contains the Corridor Overlay (CO) District along Forest Road (Route 221). The CO zoning would remain mapped and unaffected by this request.

Surrounding uses are primarily residential and agricultural. Some commercial and civic activity is located nearby.

Zoning Ordinance In accordance with Section 30-15-4 (Article I) of the Zoning Ordinance, any request to amend conditions that were voluntarily proffered and accepted by the Board of Supervisors is considered an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and must therefore follow a process similar to that of a rezoning request as outlined in Section 30-14. A public hearing by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors pursuant to Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (as amended) is required prior to any action.

The AV district regulations in Article III (Section 30-36) provide the standards for all property zoned AV in Bedford County. This section is attached for your reference. Areas zoned AV are intended to “establish areas which will serve as the focal point for cultural and commercial activity of the rural service areas of the county.”

Comprehensive Plan The Bedford County 2025 Comprehensive Plan contains several goals and objectives relative to this rezoning, which include:

Housing:

A variety of safe, sanitary and affordable housing for all County residents

4.1 A variety of dwelling units in all price ranges that are compatible with and sensitive to the environment

4.5 Well-planned and designed residential neighborhoods in areas equipped to provide essential public services

Land Use:

An orderly, efficient, and compatible growth and land use pattern that is sensitive to the natural environment

RZ140006 Staff Report Page 3 of 8

9.1 Future development directed to areas already or proposed to be served with adequate public facilities that is compatible with and sensitive to the natural environment

The Future Land Use map identifies the subject parcel and land to the west as Mixed Use. The Comprehensive Plan defines this designation as follows:

Mixed Use Areas with a mixture of residential, commercial, light industrial and civic uses located along major transportation corridors. Intention of these areas is to provide convenient services for neighborhoods and prevent strip development and multiple access points along major and secondary transportation corridors.

Land to the east of the parcel is designated Rural Residential:

Rural Residential Small clusters of residential units with some low intensity agricultural uses. These areas are intended to preserve open spaces and the agricultural landscape while allowing clustered residential development that minimizes impervious surfaces across properties.

Project Impacts Environmental The rezoning request itself will not create environmental impacts. As the property is currently wooded, additional clearing and construction will be required for any development. State and local laws will regulate grading activity.

Transportation The subject parcel has an existing construction entrance from Route 221. According to VDOT’s 2012 traffic data, the AADT (average annual daily traffic) on the segment of Route 221 from Centerville Road (Route 671) to Perrowville Road (Route 663) is 7,200 vehicles.

The County adopted Traffic Impact Study (TIS) guidelines in 2004 which requires a study for a development generating 500 trips or more (with the trip generation rate for a single-family dwelling unit as 10 trips per unit). A development of 42 lots (both phases combined) results in 420 trips.

Utilities The parcel will be served by private well and septic systems. Public water and/or sewer from the Bedford Regional Water Authority (BRWA) were not available in the area at the time of the rezoning in 2005. Public water has since been extended to the Casaloma Subdivision just north of the subject property. Public water is also located at the intersection of Route 221 and Goode Station Road (Route 668).

Public Facilities As a result of additional residents in the development, some impact to fire/rescue services, parks, schools or libraries is expected.

RZ140006 Staff Report Page 4 of 8

Aesthetic/Visual Impacts The parcel will have visibility from Route 221 after clearing and grading has occurred. There are no zoning regulations that require screening or buffering. Proffer #8 approved with the original rezoning request required a buffer along the southern and eastern property lines to help minimize impact to adjoining properties.

CONCLUSION The proposed proffer amendment according to the applicant is based on economic impact to residential development since the rezoning in 2005. The zoning of the property will remain Conditional AV and the use will continue to be restricted to single-family residential.

ATTACHMENTS 1. Zoning Map 2. Future Land Use Map 3. Aerial Map 4. Application 5. Article III, Section 30-36, AV (Agricultural Village Center District) 6. Article III, Section 30-79, Permitted Use Table 7. Rezoning Application RZ050002 8. RZ050002 Neighborhood Informational Meeting Minutes 9. RZ050002 Planning Commission Staff Report 10. RZ050002 Planning Commission Minutes from October 18, 2004, November 1, 2004 and November 15, 2004 11. RZ050002 Board of Supervisors Staff Report 12. RZ050002 Board of Supervisors Minutes from December 13, 2004, January 24, 2005 and February 14, 2005

RZ140006 Staff Report Page 5 of 8

Zoning Map

RZ140006 Staff Report Page 6 of 8

Future Land Use Map

RZ140006 Staff Report Page 7 of 8

Aerial Photograph (2011)

RZ140006 Staff Report Page 8 of 8

SITE

LOCATION MAP

TRIVIUM OAKS JEFFERSON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, BEDFORD COUNTY, VIRGINIA

17 W. Nelson Street Office: 540-464-9001 P.O. Box 1567 Fax: 540-464-5009 Lexington, VA 24450 E-Mail: [email protected] 100 0 100

GRAPHIC SCALE Rev: Rev: Job #: 14086 Date: 6/4/2014 JMD

SEC. 30-36 AV AGRICULTURAL VILLAGE CENTER DISTRICT

Sec. 30-36-1 Purpose

The purpose of the AV, Village Center district is to establish areas which will serve as the focal point for cultural and commercial activity of the rural service areas of the county. The density recommended for these areas is intended to average between one and three units per acre. Small country stores, family restaurants, and similar small service and personal service businesses, in addition to public and institutional buildings such as schools, post offices, and places of religious assembly, are commonly found at these crossroads locations. The AV district brings a sense of community to the surrounding rural areas, with an emphasis on providing the essential goods and services to rural residents, but are not intended as employment destinations for urban residents. New development should therefore be carefully considered for its compatibility with the surrounding development and the purpose and intent of the AV district. Any expansion of these areas should be contiguous to existing Village Center areas to avoid leap-frog commercial development. Similarly additional development may warrant additional public services, such as community sewer and water systems.

Sec. 30-36-2 Permitted Uses

Permitted uses shall be as listed in Section 30-79.

Sec. 30-36-3 Site Development Regulations

General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV - Use and Design Standards.

(A) Minimum lot requirements

1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system;

a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet).

b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.

2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both:

a. Area: 20,000 square feet.

b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.

(B) Minimum setback requirements

1. Front yard:

a. Principal structures: 35 feet.

b. Accessory structures: 35 feet or behind the front building line, whichever distance is less.

2. Side yard:

a. Principal structures: 10 feet.

b. Accessory structures: 10 feet when between front and rear building lines and 3 feet when behind the rear building line and 10 feet when in front of the front building line.

3. Rear yard:

a. Principal structures: 25 feet.

b. Accessory structures: 3 feet.

4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets.

All structures: 35 feet.

(D) Maximum coverage

1. Building coverage: 30 percent of the total lot area.

2. Lot coverage: 75 percent of the total lot area.

Article III Permitted Use Table

SEC. 30-79 PERMITTED USES BY DISTRICT

Sec. 30-79-1 Purpose The purpose of this table is to show the uses permitted in each of the zoning districts. Specific requirements for districts and uses are found in Article III and Article IV herein.

Sec. 30-79-2 Permitted Use Table

Permitted uses by district shall be as shown in the following table where: "R" indicates a use by right "S" indicates a special use, and an "*" indicates more stringent standards as specified in Article IV

USES

Agricultural and Forestry Uses AP AR AV R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 PRD RMH C-1 C-2 NC PCD I-1 I-2 PID EP Agriculture R R R R Agricultural Subdivision R R R S S Commercial Feedlots R* R* S* Farm Employee Housing R* R* Farmers Market R R R R* R* R* R* R* R R* R* R* R* Forestry Operations R* R* Livestock Market S* S* S* S* Sawmill SS Sewage Sludge Storage S Stable, Commercial R* R* S* S* S* S* S* R* Stable, Private R* R* R* S* S* S* S* S* Wayside Stand R* R* R* R* R* R* R*

Residential Uses AP AR AV R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 PRD RMH C-1 C-2 NC PCD I-1 I-2 PID EP Accessory Apartment R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* S* S* Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* Domestic Chickens R* R* R* R* R* Home Beauty/Barber Salon R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Home Occupation, Type I R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Home Occupation, Type II R* R* R* Kennel, Private R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Manufactured Home R* R* R* R* R* R* Manufactured Home, Class A R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Manufactured Home, Accessory R* R* R* Manufactured Home, Emergency R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Manufactured Home Park S* R* S* S* Multi-family Dwelling S* S* R* R* R* R* S* S* Residential Human Care Facility R R R R R R R R Single Family Dwelling, Attached R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Single Family Dwelling, Detached RRRRRRRR R R Single Family Dwelling, Detached (Zero Lot Line Option) R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Temporary Family Health Care Structure R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Townhouse S* S* R* R* R* S* S* Two Family Dwelling R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R*

Civic Uses AP AR AV R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 PRD RMH C-1 C-2 NC PCD I-1 I-2 PID EP Administrative Services RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Animal Shelter S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* Camps S* S* S* R* Cemetery S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* Civic Clubs R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Community Dock S* S* S* S* S* S* Community Recreation R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Correctional Facilities S Crisis Center RRRRRRRR RRRR R Cultural Services SSR SSSS S RRR R RR R R Day Care Center S* S* R* S* S* S* S* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R*

III-1 Article III Permitted Use Table

USES

Civic Uses (continued) AP AR AV R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 PRD RMH C-1 C-2 NC PCD I-1 I-2 PID EP Educational Facilities, College/University R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary S* S* R* S* S* S* S* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Family Day Care Home R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Guidance Services R RRRR R Halfway House S S S S Home for Adults SS S SSSS S Life Care Facility S S SS S S Nursing Home S S S SS S S Park and Ride Facility R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Post Office RRRRRRRR RRRRRRRR Public Assembly S S S SRSS SR Public Maintenance and Service Facility R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R* Public Parks and Recreational Areas R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Religious Assembly R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* S* S* S* R* Safety Services, Private S* S* R* S* S* S* S* R* R* R* R* S* R* R* S* R* Safety Services, Public R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Utility Services, Major S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* R* R* S* Utility Services, Minor RRRRRRRR RRRRRRRR

Office Uses AP AR AV R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 PRD RMH C-1 C-2 NC PCD I-1 I-2 PID EP Clinic S* S* S* R* R* R* R* R* R* Financial Institutions R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* General Office R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Laboratories S S S R S S R R R Medical Office S* S* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R*

Commercial Uses AP AR AV R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 PRD RMH C-1 C-2 NC PCD I-1 I-2 PID EP Adult Entertainment S* Agricultural Services R* R* R* S* R* S* R* R* R* Antique Shops S* R* R* R* R* R* R* Auction House RRR R R Automobile Dealership R* R* R* R* R* Automobile Graveyard S Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail S* R* S* R* R* Automobile Repair Services, Major S* S* S* R* R* S* Automobile Repair Services, Minor S* R* R* R* R* R* R* Automobile Rental/Leasing S R R RS Bed and Breakfast R* R* R* S* S* S* S* S* S* R* S* S* S* Boarding House S SRRS R S S Business or Trade Schools R R RR RRRR Business Support Services R R RR R R R R R* Campgrounds S* S* S* S* S* S* S* R* Carwash S* S* S* S* S* S* Commercial Indoor Amusement S S R S S S S S S R Commercial Indoor Entertainment S S RRSRRRRR Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation S S S R S S S S S R Commercial Outdoor Entertainment S S R S S S S R Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation S S SS SSSSR Communications Services S RR RRRRR Conference Center S* S* R* R* R* Construction Sales and Services S* R* S* R* R* R* R* Consumer Repair Services R R RRRRRR Convenience Store S* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Dance Hall S S S S S Equipment Sales and Rental S* S* S* R* R* S*

III-2 Article III Permitted Use Table

USES

Commercial Uses (continued) AP AR AV R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 PRD RMH C-1 C-2 NC PCD I-1 I-2 PID EP Flea Market S S S S Funeral Services R R R R R R Garden Center R* R* R* R* S* R* R* R* R* Gasoline Station S* R* R* S* S* R* R* S* R* General Store R* R* General Store, with fuel sales SS Golf Course S* S* S* S* S* R* R* R* R* Hospital R R R R R Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge R R R R R R R R Kennel, Commercial R* S* S* S* R* S* R* R* R* R* Landscaping and Lawn Care Services S* R* S* R* R* R* R* Laundry RRRRR Manufactured Home Sales S* R* S* R* R* R* Marina S S SS R R Meeting Hall S* S* R* S* S* S* R* R* R* Microbrewery RRRRR Mini-warehouse R* R* R* R* R* Pawn Shop RRRRR Personal Improvement Services R R RR RRRR Personal Services R R RRRRRRR Recreational Vehicle Sales and Services S* R* R* R* R* R* Restaurant, Drive-in and Fast Food S* R* S* R* S* R* R* R* R* R* Restaurant, Family R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Restaurant, General R* R* R* R* R* R Retail Sales R R S R R R R R R R* Studio, Fine Arts R R RRRRRRRR Surplus Sales RSRRS Truck Stop S* S* S* S* S* S* Veterinary Hospital/Clinic RRR R RRRRRRR

Industrial Uses AP AR AV R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 PRD RMH C-1 C-2 NC PCD I-1 I-2 PID EP Asphalt Plant S* S* Composting R* R* R* R* R* Construction Yards S* S* R* R* R* R* R* R* Custom Manufacturing R* S* R* S* R* R* S* R* R* R* R* Industry, Type I R S S SRRR Industry, Type II SR S Industry, Type III SS Landfill, Sanitary S SS S Meat Packing and Related Industries SS Railroad Facilities RR Recycling Centers and Stations S* S* S* S* S* S* S* R* S* Resource Extraction S* S* S* S* S* Scrap and Salvage Yards S* S* Transfer Stations S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* Transportation Terminal S S S R R S R* Truck Terminal RR R Warehouse and Distribution RRRR Winery S* S* S* R* R* R* R*

Miscellaneous Uses AP AR AV R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 PRD RMH C-1 C-2 NC PCD I-1 I-2 PID EP Amateur Radio Tower R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Aviation Facilities, Private S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* Broadcasting Tower, Radio S* S* S* S* S* Outdoor Gatherings S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* Parking Facility S* S* R* R* R* R* R* R* Shooting Range, Outdoor S* S* S* Wind Energy System, Small R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 R* R* R* S* S* S* S* S* S* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* R* Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* Wireless Communication Facility, Class 4 S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S* S*

(Ord. of 07.09.01; Ord. of 02.11.02; Ord. of 10.12.04; Ord. of 03.07.05; Ord. of 07.23.07; Ord. of 05.27.08; Ord. of 11.12.08; Ord. of 11.12.09; Ord. of 02.28.11; Ord. of 09.26.11; Ord. of 11.28.11; Ord. of 03.26.12; Ord. of 02.25.13; Ord. of 04.22.13; Ord. of 06.10.13; Ord. of 07.22.13)

III-3

Russ Orrison attended the NIM along with 18 citizens. Attached are handouts, passed out by Russ Orrison of Perkins and Orrison.

Concerns expressed by citizens:

 What is the maximum amount of lots allowed presently and what is the maximum amount of lots allowed if he gets the rezoning.

 If they are allowed to rezone, could they subdivide more than what they are showing?

 What are the building restrictions currently on that site?

 What were the issues with the rezoning the first time around?

 What is the status of public water in the area? Is PSA going to extend that line here?

 When might we be able to expect to have public water? 90+ lots are going into the general area and are going to be drawing from the water table; this is obviously going to have an impact on the ground water supply in the area. Does PSA have a plan for this area that you know of?

 Do the lots have to front in the AR to adhere to the AR requirements?

 What about traffic? What is this development going to do to the traffic?

 We don’t like the traffic patterns already and this development is going to make it worse.

 What are the water and sewer restrictions for the 42 single-family homes? Do the lots have to be perked or have they already been perked?

 How many of the lots will perk now?

 What is a development like this going to do to the existing water table? Can the existing water table handle a development like this?

 This is and Agricultural community where farming is abundant – this increased residential homes in the area might increase the number of people that are against farming. What is going to be done to say that these people can’t just move in and vote to move me out?

 High-end homes and High-end covenants might attract people that don’t like my farming. What is going to be done to ensure that they don’t drive me out?

 With the increased residences, comes families and children, will there be any common space in the development to give them a place to be entertained, like a ball field or play ground? I would want something to divert their attention from playing on my property, from playing with my cows?

 Will fencing be provided or boarders?

 Why does the owner want to have bigger lots, and therefore less lots? What is his gain from this? Why wouldn’t he just do the maximum amount of lots possible?

 Please explain the by-right use process, what they would have to do to get what is allowed by right passed, as well as the process that they would go through if they get this rezoning passed.

 If they get the whole parcel zoned AV, can they make the entire lots 1 acre in size?

 Are there any outlined parcels yet? Can we have a say in suggesting proffers?

 What is to prevent them from going in and putting 42 singlewides on all of the lots?

 How much pull does the Planning Department and the Planning Commission really have, when trying to regulate this development?

 Is the Planning Commissions’ Bite only their recommendation that they make to the Board?

 Do you have any idea if VDOT thinks Bellevue Road can handle the traffic or if their standards might prohibit this big of a development?

 How many lots were proposed the last time this property was up for a rezoning?

 If I buy a lot right in the middle, is there anything that would prohibit me, a neighbor, from buying it and is there anything is the zoning ordinance that would prohibit me from raising hogs on that lot? Can the developer refuse to sell me a lot based on my intentions?

 Is this piece of land in a Historic District? Is there any way for us to get it in a Historic District?

 If this land was in a Historic District, what would that do to this project?

 What happens to the runoff from this property, who’s land is it going to end up on?

 Is there any way for us to get the developer to cut down less trees, provide a common space for the community or make much needed road improvements?

MEMORANDUM

TO: Planning Commission

FROM: Philip G. Thompson, Director of Planning

DATE: October 18, 2004

SUBJECT: Rezoning Application #RZ050002; Constantine Rosko

SYNOPSIS

Constantine Rosko is requesting to rezone property (identified as Tax Map Number 114- A-82) from AR, Agricultural/Residential District, to AV, Agricultural Village Center District, on Forest Road (Route 221) in Goode. The property also falls within the Corridor Overlay District. The application proposes to change the underlying zoning district (AR), but does not propose to change the overlay-zoning district (CO).

BACKGROUND

APPLICANT/OWNER The applicant/owner/developer is Constantine Rosko, 48 Old Trail Road, Watermill, NY 11976.

LOCATION The property (Tax Map Number 114-A-82) is located on the south side of Forest Road (Route 221) approximately 0.27 mile east of the intersection of Forest Road and Bellevue Road (Route 643). The property proposed for rezoning contains approximately 72.3 acres, 24 acres is currently zoned AV, Agricultural Village Center District and 48.3 acres is currently zoned AR, Agricultural/Residential District.

PROPOSED CHANGE The request proposes to change the existing zoning from AR, Agricultural/Residential District to AV, Agricultural Village Center District. The developer has requested to rezone the property to provide a more consistently scaled development than the current zoning designation allows. The developer’s proposal includes 42 lots varying from 2.01 acres to 3.11 acres with the majority of the lots proposed being 2.01 acres in size. The proposal also includes the construction of three new local secondary roads. The developer states that the proposal will not only allow for a more consistently scaled development, but will also allow the developer to provide larger, and therefore fewer overall lots, than what is allowed by the current zoning. The developer further states that the larger lots will likely result in up-scale homes being constructed, which would keep this development in character with the surrounding area. The requested zoning change

1 prohibits some of the permitted uses on the property as a result of proffered zoning conditions (see attachment).

Sue Stephenson submitted a rezoning application on December 16, 2002, for this same property (RZ030001). The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on February 3, 2003, where the Planning Commission recommended denial of the application by a vote of 6-0. On February 6, 2003, a formal withdraw letter was received from Ken McBride, Sue Stephenson’s agent.

NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATIONAL MEETING

A neighborhood informational meeting was held regarding the project on September 28, 2004 at the Otter River Elementary School with approximately 18 citizens in attendance. Staff explained the process, subdivision regulations, and the various uses that are allowed in the AR and AV Districts. The applicant’s agent, Mr. Russ Orrison, explained the plans for the property and asked the citizens for their input. The citizens present voiced many concerns. Concerns included: too much development being allowed in an area with an already overburdened water supply, increase on volunteer fire and rescue departments, trespassing onto adjacent farms and increased liability as a result, increased impact on schools, loss of privacy, noise, increase in traffic onto Route 221, potential build-out of the remaining property and an overall concern with allowing the placement of development in areas without adequate public infrastructure to support it.

ANALYSIS

Zoning/Land Use Compatibility The property proposed for rezoning is currently wooded and the remaining property includes a residential home built in the 1840’s known as Trivium. All surrounding properties are primarily used for agriculture with residential as the secondary use. Surrounding properties are zoned AR, Agricultural/Residential to the north, and east and AV, Agricultural Village Center District is to the west and south.

Zoning Ordinance Currently, the portion of the property being requested for rezoning is zoned AR, Agricultural/Residential District and is within the CO, Corridor Overlay District. Article III of the Bedford County Zoning Ordinance, Site Development Regulations (Section 30- 34-3) limits the number of divisions in this zoning district to ten divisions of the minimum lot size (1.5 acres). The AR zoning district also allows for unlimited agricultural divisions (20 acres or greater). The AV, Agricultural Village Center District allows for unlimited divisions of the minimum lot size (1.0 acre). The AV, like the AR, also allows for unlimited agricultural divisions of 20 acres or greater. Section 30-36-3, site development regulations for the AV District allows for a greater density than the AR District of 1 unit per acre and could allow for even greater densities if public water or sewer are available. Unlike the AR District, the AV district allows for mixed uses.

2 Agricultural, residential, civic, commercial, and light industrial uses are allowed in this district.

Comprehensive Plan The County’s Comprehensive Plan (1988) contains several goals and objectives which are relative to this rezoning. They include:

Land Use: Maintain the essential natural beauty and pastoral character of the county;

- Develop orderly and harmonious growth and land use; and - Protect the individuals’ right to use their property as they please as long as the use does not pose an environmental hazard and does not cause an undue burden on other property owners.

• Protect agricultural land from the premature encroachment of development.

• Direct growth to the rural service nodes and established communities in the County.

• Direct public services and facilities to areas of desired growth and land use.

Transportation: Provide for the effective and efficient movement of people and goods.

• Develop primary roads, secondary roads and highways which meet minimum standards for traffic volume and safety.

Housing: Achieve adequate housing and a decent living environment for all county residents.

• Develop residential areas convenient to places of employment, commercial enterprises and community facilities.

• Develop well planned, designed and located residential neighborhoods coordinated with the provision of necessary water, sewer, parks, schools, and highways.

3 Community Facilities: Develop adequate community facilities and services to meet existing and anticipated needs.

• Provide or expand water and sewer facilities to areas of high population density or to areas where well and septic tank use poses a health or environmental hazard to assure adequate and unpolluted surface and groundwater supplies for present and future generations.

• Plan ahead to install public water and sewer facilities in anticipation of and to direct development.

Environmental There is a creek on the property that feeds into a pond. The pond is outside the limits of the proposed subdivision. No significant impact is expected to the creek or stream. The State and Local Erosion and Sediment Control laws will regulate all storm water run-off from this project.

Transportation The property is located on a state maintained road (Forest Road; Route 221). The project will utilize one entrance off of Route 221. The AADT in this area is 6,500 according to VDOT’s 2001 traffic data. A preliminary review concerning the sight distance was performed by VDOT and found to be adequate for the proposed street connection. However, before VDOT can determine additional traffic requirements or measures, a master plan including traffic generation figures must be submitted. It is anticipated that more will be required at this location than the standard street connection such as a left or right turn lane.

Utilities The property will be served by private wells and septic systems. According to the Virginia Department of Health, there have been reports of failed wells and septic systems in the area. However, the rate of failure is not outside of the normal anticipated rate of failure. Dry natural watercourses have been noted in this area, as well as countywide.

According to the Public Service Authority, public water crosses Bellevue Road approximately 4 miles from this property. The extension of the public water system would not be feasible for the amount of service connections that would be gained. According to PSA, running a water line this distance would jeopardize water quality because not enough connections would be secured to the line to allow for adequate turnover.

Public Facilities The proposal does not include any recreational amenities. There is an anticipated impact on the school system and minimal impacts are expected on fire and rescue.

4 Aesthetic/Visual Impacts A portion of the property is visible from Route 221. The property is currently wooded and there will be visual impacts from this project from surrounding properties. The Zoning Ordinance does not address buffer yards in this specific instance. However, the CO, Corridor Overlay District regulates the removal of healthy hardwood trees. Exterior lighting is addressed in the ordinance as well.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Location/Zoning Map 2. Aerial Image 3. Application 4. Justification 5. Concept Plan 6. Neighborhood Information Meeting Minutes 7. Most recent “Rezoning Layout” concept plan submitted (42 Lots) 8. “By Right” Layout (53 Lots) 9. Article III District Regulations Section 30-34-3 10. Article III District Regulations Section 30-36-3 11. Article III District Regulations Section 30-77 12. Planning Commission Minutes, February 3, 2003 13. Soil Feasibility Study Dated November 11, 2002 14. VDOT Letter Dated September 27, 2004 15. VDOT Letter Dated December 4, 2002

5 MINUTES for Bedford County Planning Commission October 18,2004 County Administration Building

A regular meeting of the Bedford County Planning Commission was held on October 18,2004, in the Boardroom. The Planning Commission was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mr. Lindy Batten, Chairman, and it was determined that there was a quorum present for the purpose of conducting business.

The following Planning Commission members were present:

Mr. Lindy Batten, Chairman Mr. Rick Crockett Mr. Gurnie Feazell Mr. Fred Fralick Mr. Steve Wilkerson

Mr. Harry Stevens and Mr. Tony Sprouse were absent.

The following staff members were present: Mr. Philip G. Thompson, Director of Planning, Mr. Carl Boggess, County Attorney, Mr. Johnnie Roarkand Ms. April Masseth, Planners, and Ms. Janet Daniels, Administrative Assistant.

Mr. Batten asked if there were changes to the agenda. Mr. Thompson stated there were no minutes soitem D should be deleted. The agenda was approved as amended by acclamation.

Mr. Batten opened the public hearing onSRP0S0003. Mr. Roark presented the staff report. Mr. Dan Early, Engineer, gave the applicant's presentation. Commissioner' questions/concerns were:

■ What is the proposed time frame for the transition/upgrade? ■ What is thedifference between a Class 6 operator and a Class 3 operator? ■ How/when is the green sand disposed of? ■ Is a back-up generator purposed? ■ Will the existing water plant building remain or be removed?

Mr. Early answers to the questions/concerns were:

■ The proposed time frame is 60 to 90 days from the time of approval by therequired agencies. ■ A larger system means more flow and requires a more knowledgeable operator to operate the facility. ■ The green sandcanbe disposed of in a landfill. ■ There is no back-up generator proposed. ■ The existing building will be demolished and removed.

Mr. Demarco, citizen, asked what protective measure is being taken in case of chlorine leakage. Mr. Early stated that there is no chlorine gas used. There is a chlorine solution/liquid that can be washed into the drain system if spilled. Mr. Demarco stated that his concern was answered and he is in favor of the upgrade. Planning Commission Minute* October 18, 2004

Mr. Batten closed the public hearing for SRP050003 at 7:58 p.m. Mr. Feazell made a motion to approve SRPO5O0O3. Mr. Fralick seconded the motion. Commissioners voted 5-0 to recommend approval of SRP050003.

Mr. Batten opened the public hearing for RZ050002. Ms. Masseth presented the staff report. Mr. Russ Orrison, Engineer, gave the applicant's presentation. There were 3 citizens present to speak. Their concerns were:

Limited water table. Overcrowding of schools. Number of and sites of proposed driveways/new roadways. Additional traffic on a narrow Route 643. Historic properties not being preserved. Cost of amenities, i.e. recreational facilities, emergency services, etc. Liability on adjacent property owners. Extending the AV boundary that the Commission already set.

Mr. Batten closed the public hearing for RZOS0002. Commissioners discussed the difference between the proposed concept plan and the by right plan. Commissioners' questions/concerns were:

■ Creating AV zoning that dosen't meet AV standards is not in compliance with zoning ordinance/comprehensive plan. ■ Same concerns as in 2002 when voted to deny rezoning request. ■ Water tables may be an issue and no public water is proposed in the near future. ■ Will land support proposed drainfields?

Commissioners asked Mr. Orrison his view on the proffers proposed by staff. Mr. Orrison stated that he has been instructed by the owner/developer to present a by-right plan or come up with something better. Mr. Orrison believes the proposed larger lots are the better plan. The proffers being offered in the rezoning request will prohibit business uses and maintain a residential area. The larger lots will allow for more green space. Mr. Orrison noted that construction materials and size of dwellings could be addressed through by-laws of the subdivision. If VDOT requires the developer put in a turn lane, that will be done, however Mr. Orrison believes that should be a VDOT call and not required by staff. Mr. Orrison stated that the developer will work with staff as to an acceptable phase development of the properties.

After some discussion, Mr. Fralick stated that Commissioners would need to see the proffers in writing before making a recommendation of RZ050002. Mr. Fralick made a motion to postpone making a recommendation on RZ0S0002 until the meeting on November 1,2004. Mr. Wilkerson seconded the motion adding that he would request the owner/developer consider implementing turning lanes into the proffers. Commissioners voted 5-0 to postpone further action on RZ050002 until November 1,2004.

Mr. Batten opened the public hearing for Short-term rentals at 8:55 p.m. Mr. Thompson reviewed proposed Sec. 30-100-18, short-term rentals. Twenty-three citizens spoke. Eleven citizens were in favor of short-term rentals. These citizens included realtors, homeowners of rental properties, and people who have rented homes in the past. Seven citizens were against short-term rentals in residential areas, and other citizens spoke on the pros and cons of short-term rentals. Citizens' concerns were: Planning Commission Minute October 18, 2004

■ Discrimination against owners of short-term rentals if imposed with restrictions that are not required by all homeowners. ■ Loss of revenue to County and homeowners if short-term rentals are prohibited. ■ Concern that short-term rental properties are being penalized for public nuisance issues instead of rental issues. ■ Disagree with septic requirements of proposed regulations for short-term rentals. ■ Feel that rental sign should be allowed on site for advertising property and to provide emergency numbers of realtor/owner. ■ Against all short-term rentals in residential neighborhoods. ■ Will regulations be enforced and by whom? ■ Where will fire extinguishers be kept? ■ Short-term rental is a business use, not a residential use. ■ How will rental properties on larger tracts of land and not around Smith Mountain Lake be affected if these regulations are imposed? " Disagree with 2 year olds being counted as adults. ■ In favor of eliminating all short-term rentals of residential properties in Bedford County. ■ Rental property/business decreases value of surrounding residential properties. ■ Regulations discriminate against families renting the properties. ■ Unlicensed realtors renting property.

There being no other citizens to speak, Mr. Batten closed the public hearing for Sec. 30-100-18 short-term rentals at 10:08 p.m. After some discussion, Mr. Wilkerson made a motion to recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt Sec. 30-100-18 with the following amendments:

1) Sec. 30-100-18 (A) to read; "The following regulations shall apply to all short-term rentals for any period less than 30 days of residential dwelling units in the R-l, R-2 and PRD zoning districts:" 2) Number 3 be changed to read,". ..any person over the age of 12." 3) Number 6 be amended to read,"...fire extinguisher located in a visible and readily assessable area, i.e. kitchen or hallway, within each dwelling unit."

After more discussion, Mr. Feazell seconded the motion. Planning Commissioners voted 5-0 to recommend Sec. 30-100-18, as amended, to the Board of Supervisors of adoption.

Mr. Batten asked if there was anyone who wished to speak for Citizen's Comment Period. Mr. Demarco said that he has reviewed the ordinance and has found the words substantial and substantially to be used innumerably. He suggested staff review and adjust the wording to be more concise.

Mr. Thompson informed Commissioners that they will have a full agenda for the meetings on November 1,2004, and November 15,2004. Mr. Thompson reminded Commissioners of the Regional Planning Summit on November 17,2004, and the joint meeting with the Board of Supervisors on November 29,2004.

Mr. Thompson gave Commissioners some of the maps they had requested at an earlier meeting. The rest should be forthcoming at the next meeting. Planning Commission Minute October 18, 2004

There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 10:38 p.m.

Respectfully submitted:

Philip G. Jphompson, AICP.CZA Director of Planning Planning Commission Secretary

Approved by:

Lindy Batten, Chairman MINUTES for Bedford County Planning Commission November 1,2004 County Administration Building

A regular meeting of the Bedford County Planning Commission was held on November 1,2004, in the Boardroom. The Planning Commission was called to order at 6:06 p.m. by Mr. Lindy Batten, Chairman, and it was determined that there was a quorum present for the purpose of conducting business.

The following Planning Commission members were present:

Mr. Lindy Batten, Chairman Mr. Rick Crockett Mr. Gurnie Feazell Mr. Fred Fralick Mr. Harry Stevens Mr. Steve Wilkerson

Mr. Tony Sprouse was absent.

The following staff members were present: Mr. Philip Thompson, Director of Planning, Mr. Johnnie Roark, Planner, Mr. Carl Boggess, County Attorney, and Ms. Janet Daniels, Administrative Assistant.

The agenda was amended to delete item F (Discussion/Action Manufactured Home in an R-2 zoning district) and to add Citizen's comment period before item E (Discussion/Action RZ0S0002). The agenda was approved as amended by acclamation. Mr. Batten asked if there were any corrections to the minutes of October 4,2004, or October 18,2004. Mr. Crockett stated that he had read the minutes and made a motion to approve the minutes. Commissioners voted 6-0 to approve the minutes of October 4, 2004, and October 18,2004, as written.

Mr. Batten asked if there were any citizens present who wished to speak at Citizens Comment Period. Ms. Joanne Miller and Ms. Nan Carmack spoke against the proposed rezoning (RZ0S0002) on Bellevue Road and Forest Road. They repeated their concerns from the public hearing on October 18,2004, emphasizing the narrow width of Bellevue Road. Mrs. Helen Davis and Ms. Erin Davis spoke requesting reconsideration of their application to put a singlewide manufactured home on property zoned R-l. Mr. Crockett agreed to visit the site as it is in his district.

Mr. Batten asked for discussion or a motion on RZ0S0002. Planning Commissioners felt their concerns were not aptly addressed in the proffers provided by Trivium Oaks. Commissioners concerns/questions were:

■ There are no buffers proposed. ■ There is no defined construction material for proposed dwellings. What type building materials will be used? • What are the proposed setbacks for dwellings? ■ Will clients looking to purchase lots be told the wells in that area went dry during the drought approximately 2 years ago? ■ What is the proposed phasing of this development? Planning Commission Minult., November I, 2004

■ The danger of more traffic from growth/development on a road as narrow as Bellevue Road. ■ Is the proposed zoning/plat better than the by-right plat/zoning? ■ The proposed volume of development is not the intent of the Comprehensive Plan.

After intense discussion, Mr. Fralick made a motion to postpone a decision on RZ050002 pending written proffers addressing right of way dedication, housing materials, setbacks, buffers, and including suggested proffers from staff until the November 15,2004, meeting. Mr. Stevens seconded the motion. Commissioners agreed with a vote of 5-1. Mr. Wilkerson voted no.

Mr. Batten moved to zoning ordinance worksession. Mr. Roark asked Commissioners for input on Sec. 30-100-16. Staff recommends adding sections (B) and (C). Commissioners expressed their views of the appropriate size for a waste/debris container and suggested the amendment include "construction debris be contained within the waste container at the end of each work day". Mr. Crockett made a motion to recommend Sec. 30-100-16 be adopted to read:

(B) The waste/debris containerfor construction material shall be a minimum of6'(L)x5' (W) x 2 '(H) and all construction debris shall be contained within the waste container at the end of each work day.

(C) All waste/debris containers for both human waste and construction debris shall be removed from the job site within 30 days of the issuance of the certificate ofoccupancy.

Mr. Wilkerson seconded the motion. Commissioners agreed with a vote of 5-1. Mr. Fralick disagreed.

Mr. Roark showed Commissioners a Powerpoint presentation of existing freestanding light fixtures in commercial/business areas of the County and told them the various heights of the fixtures. Mr. Feazell made a motion to recommend adding number 4 "Parking lot light poles, canopy structures, and other similar structures in commercial and industrial areas shall not exceed25' in height", to Sec. 90-94 (A). Mr. Wilkerson seconded the motion. Commissioners agreed with a vote of 6-0.

Mr. Roark presented language for Sec. 30-30-3 (E) as requested by the Commission at the last meeting. The proposed amendment will read; "Comments offered by the director ofplanning or his/her agent on a proposed site development plan shall remain effective for a period ofsix (6) months from the date of issuance. After this period, the comments and the site development plan shall become void unless substantial progress has been made by the developer to address the comments ". Mr. Wilkerson made a motion to recommend adoption of Sec. 30-90-3 (E) as presented. Mr. Crockett seconded the motion. Commissioners agreed with a vote of 6-0.

Mr. Roark told Commissioners staff recommends Sec. 30-100-9 (B) be amended to include the word front for clarification purposes in defining the building line. Commissioners discussed fences and fence height in great detail. Mr. Boggess asked that action/recommendation on Sec. 30-100-9 be postponed for more review. Mr. Crocket made a motion to postpone Sec. 30-100-9 pending staff and Mr. Boggess review. Mr. Wilkerson seconded the motion. Commissioners agreed with a vote of 6-0.

Mr. Roark provided information and a Powerpoint presentation showing displays of merchandise along the corridor overlay district. Commissioners agreed all setback requirements should apply to every business along the corridor in order to protect the viewshed and enhance visibility along the corridor overlay district. Staff will review Commissioners comments and prepare regulations for outdoor display in the corridor overlay district viewshed for review at a future meeting. 2 Planning Commission Minute* November 1, 2004

Mr. Thompson informed Commissioners that they will have 3 public hearings at the next meeting on November 15, 2004, and will review proffers for the proposed rezoning RZ050002. The following meeting will be December 6, 2004.

Mr. Thompson reminded Commissioners of the joint meeting with the Board of Supervisors on November 29, 2004.

There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 8:28 p.m.

Respectfully submitted:

Philip Q. Thompson, ^fTCP, CZA Director of Planning Planning Commission Secretary

Approved by:

Chairman MINUTES for Bedford County Planning Commission November 15,2004 County Administration Building

A regular meeting of the Bedford County Planning Commission was held on November 15,2004, in the Boardroom. The Planning Commission was called to order at 7:34 p.m. by Mr. Steve Wilkerson, Vice-Chairman, and it was determined that there was a quorum present for the purpose of conducting business.

The following Planning Commission members were present:

Mr. Lindy Batten, Chairman Mr. Rick Crockett Mr. Gurnie Feazell Mr. Fred Fralick Mr. Tony Sprouse Mr. Harry Stevens Mr. Steve Wilkerson

The following staff members were present: Mr. Philip G. Thompson, Director of Planning, Mr. Carl Boggess, County Attorney, Mr. Johnnie Roark, Ms. April Masseth, and Mr. Matt Braun, Planners, and Ms. Janet Daniels, Administrative Assistant.

Mr. Batten, owner of Two K Properties, LC, abstained from participating in the meeting until the completion of the public hearing and Commission action on SU050004, Two K Properties, LC.

Mr. Wilkerson asked that the agenda be amended to move item G to E, item E to F, item F to G, and add Ms. Davis manufactured home, under Other Business. The agenda was approved as amended by acclamation.

Mr. Wilkerson asked if there were additions or corrections to the minutes of November 1,2004. Mr. Stevens noted he had read the minutes and found no errors. Mr. Stevens made a motion to approve the minutes of November 1,2004, as written. Mr. Feazell seconded the motion. Commissioners agreed with a vote of 6-0.

There were 2 citizens to speak at Citizen's Comment Period. Dr. Lovelace encouraged Commissioners to approve RZ050002 with the proffers offered by the developer rather than allow the current by right subdivision of the property. Ms. Erin Davis requested Commissioners/Bedford County find a way to allow a singlewide manufactured home for her on property currently belonging to her grandmother. There being no other citizens to speak, Mr. Wilkerson closed Citizen's Comment Period.

Mr. Wilkerson opened the public hearing on SU050004. Mr. Roark presented the staff report. Mr. Lin Batten gave the applicant's presentation. There were no citizens present to speak on SU050004. Mr. Wilkerson closed the public hearing. After some discussion, Mr. Fralick made a motion to recommend approval of SU050004 with staff conditions. Mr. Sprouse seconded the motion. Commissioners agreed with a vote of 6-0. Planning Commission Minutes November /5' 2004

Mr. Batten joined the Planning Commission at 7:55 pm.

Mr Wilkerson opened the public hearing for SUO5OOO5. Ms. Masseth presented the staff report. Mr Bob Halstead gave the applicant's presentation. There were no citizens present to speak. Mr. Wilkerson closed the public hearing for SUO5OOO5. After some discussion concerning traffic impact on Route 122 Mr. Feazell made a motion to recommend approval of SUO5OOO5 with staff conditions Mr Stevens seconded the motion. Mr. Fralick asked staff at what point in the process VDOT becomes involved with entrance plans. Mr. Roark stated that the Site Plan will show the proposed entrance into the property and VDOT entrance approval is required before the Site Plan will be approved. Commissioners voted 7-0 to recommend approval of SU050005.

Mr Wilkerson opened the public hearing for SRP050004. Mr. Braun presented the staff report. Mr. Jay Lewis and Mr. Gary Hostetter, gave the applicant's presentation. There were no citizens present to speak. Mr. Wilkerson closed the public hearing for SRP050004. Commissioners'

questions/concerns were:

• Will there be lights on the proposed recreation fields and if so will the lights be defected from the surrounding residential properties? ■ Will there be a buffer area between the ball fields and the public road to prevent spectators from parking on the roads to watch sports activities? - Commissioners would like to see buffer area to cushion noise, traffic, etc., from residential homes along Route 811.

Mr. Hostetter stated that due to the expense, there would be no lights on the fields at this time, nor in the near future. He also noted that they would entertain the idea of a buffer/landscaped area.

Mr. Fralick made a motion to recommend approval of SRP050004. Mr. Sprouse seconded the motion. Commissioners agreed with a vote of 7-0.

Mr Wilkerson asked Commissioners for discussion or a motion on RZ050002. Mr. Sprouse stated that he was absent from the public hearing and would abstain from voting on RZ050002. Commissioners' reviewed/discussed the proffers offered by the developer dated November 15,2004. Mr Batten made a motion to recommend approval of RZ050002 with written proffers as presented by the developer and dated November 15,2004. Mr. Feazell seconded the motion. Commissioners voted 5-1-1 to recommend approval of RZ050002. Mr. Wilkerson voted no and Mr. Sprouse abstained.

Mr. Thompson informed Commissioners that they will have meetings on December 6,2004, and December 20,2004. Mr. Thompson reminded Commissioners of the joint meeting with the Board of Supervisors on November 29,2004.

Mr Crockett asked that staff review Ms. Davis' request for placing a manufactured home on property zoned R-l in District 1. Mr. Crockett noted that he had visited the proposed site and talked with Ms. Davis. Mr. Thompson suggested that the Commission may need to discuss making changes to the Ordinance at a future meeting.

There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 8:53 p.m. Planning Commission Mimucs November 15, 2004

Respectfully submitted:

Philip G.JPhompson, AICP/CZA Directors Planning Planning Commission Secretary

Steven Wilkerson, Vice-Chairman MEMORANDUM

TO: Board of Supervisors

THROUGH: William C. Rolfe, County Administrator

FROM: Philip G. Thompson, Director of Planning

DATE: December 3, 2004

SUBJECT: Rezoning Application #RZ050002; Constantine Rosko

SYNOPSIS

Constantine Rosko is requesting to rezone a portion of property (identified as Tax Map Number 114-A-82) from AR, Agricultural/Residential District, to AV, Agricultural Village Center District, on Forest Road (Route 221) in Goode. The property also falls within the Corridor Overlay District.

BACKGROUND

APPLICANT/OWNER The applicant/owner/developer is Constantine Rosko, 48 Old Trail Road, Watermill, NY 11976.

1 prohibits many of the permitted uses on the property as a result of proffered zoning conditions (see attachment).

Sue Stephenson submitted a rezoning application on December 16, 2002, for this same property (RZ030001). The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on February 3, 2003, where the Planning Commission recommended denial of the application by a vote of 6-0. On February 6, 2003, a formal letter withdrawing the application was received from Ken McBride, Sue Stephenson’s agent.

NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATIONAL MEETING

A neighborhood informational meeting was held regarding the project on September 28, 2004, at the Otter River Elementary School with approximately 18 citizens in attendance. Staff explained the process, subdivision regulations, and the various uses that are allowed in the AR and AV Districts. The applicant’s agent, Mr. Russ Orrison, explained the plans for the property and asked the citizens for their input. The citizens present voiced many concerns. Concerns included: too much development being allowed in an area with an already overburdened water supply, increase on volunteer fire and rescue departments, trespassing onto adjacent farms and increased liability as a result, increased impact on schools, loss of privacy, noise, increase in traffic onto Route 221, potential build-out of the remaining property and an overall concern with allowing the placement of development in areas without adequate public infrastructure to support it.

ANALYSIS

Zoning/Land Use Compatibility The property proposed for rezoning is currently wooded and the remaining property includes a residential home built in the 1840’s known as Trivium. All surrounding properties are primarily used for agriculture with residential as the secondary use. Surrounding properties are zoned AR, Agricultural/Residential, to the north, and east and AV, Agricultural Village Center, to the west and south.

Comprehensive Plan The County’s Comprehensive Plan (1988) contains several goals and objectives which are relative to this rezoning. They include:

Land Use: Maintain the essential natural beauty and pastoral character of the county;

Develop orderly and harmonious growth and land use; and

Protect the individuals’ right to use their property as they please as long as the use does not pose an environmental hazard and does not cause an undue burden on other property owners.

• Direct growth to the rural service nodes and established communities in the County.

• Direct public services and facilities to areas of desired growth and land use.

Housing: Achieve adequate housing and a decent living environment for all county residents.

• Develop residential areas convenient to places of employment, commercial enterprises and community facilities.

• Develop well planned, designed and located residential neighborhoods coordinated with the provision of necessary water, sewer, parks, schools, and highways.

3 Utilities The property will be served by private wells and septic systems. According to the Virginia Department of Health, there have been reports of failed wells and septic systems in the area. However, the rate of failure is not outside of the normal anticipated rate of failure. Dry natural watercourses have been noted in this area, as well as countywide.

Public Facilities The proposal does not include any recreational amenities. There is an anticipated impact on the school system and minimal impacts are expected on fire and rescue.

Aesthetic/Visual Impacts A portion of the property is visible from Route 221. The property is currently wooded and there will be visual impacts from this project from surrounding properties. The Zoning Ordinance does not address buffer yards in this specific instance. However, the CO, Corridor Overlay, District regulates the removal of healthy hardwood trees. Exterior lighting is addressed in the ordinance as well.

Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 18, 2004. The Planning Commission discussed the application on November 1, 2004, and November 15, 2004. On November 15th, the Planning Commission recommended approval (5-1-1, Wilkerson voting no, Sprouse abstained) of the proposed rezoning with proffers.

Board of Supervisors Action The following motions are available for the Board to make at its December 13th meeting.

Voting YES: ______

Voting NO: ______

After reviewing the public testimony, the public record, the Planning Commission’s recommendation, the goals and objectives of the County’s Comprehensive Plan, and Section 30-3 of the County’s Zoning Ordinance, Supervisor______made a motion to deny RZ050002, Constantine Rosko.

Voting YES: ______

Voting NO: ______

ATTACHMENTS

1. Location/Zoning Map 2. Aerial Image 3. Application 4. Neighborhood Information Meeting Minutes 5. Article III District Regulations Section 30-34-3 6. Article III District Regulations Section 30-36-3 7. Article III District Regulations Section 30-77 8. Planning Commission Minutes, February 3, 2003 9. Soil Feasibility Study Dated November 11, 2002 10. VDOT Letter Dated September 27, 2004 11. VDOT Letter Dated December 4, 2002 12. Proffers dated November 15, 2004 13. Ordinance

5 12/13/04 - 296

j. Consideration of a Request to Authorize the Sheriff’s office to Submit an Internet Crimes Against Children grant to the U.S. Department of Justice k. Consideration of Special Review Project #050004 – Forest Youth Athletic Association Field Expansion l. Consideration of Official Acceptance of the Virginia Outdoors Fund/L&WCF Grant m. Consideration to Request a Public Hearing for the Junior Firefighter Ordinance n. Resolutions of Appreciation for Marie Batten, E. Anthony Ware, II, and Glen Ayers ACTION: Approve resolutions/motions as presented. (2) Vice Chairman Cheek made a motion to approve the consent agenda as amended. Voting yes: Mr. Wheeler, Mr. Cheek, Dr. Bashore, Mr. Pollard, Mr. Lowry, Mr. Neudorfer and Mr. Arrington Voting no: None Adopted Unanimously. ______(3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Vice-Chairman Cheek made a motion to approve the minutes of November 22, 2004, as presented. Voting yes: Mr. Wheeler, Mr. Cheek, Dr. Bashore, Mr. Pollard, Mr. Lowry, Mr. Neudorfer and Mr. Arrington Voting no: None Adopted Unanimously. ______(4) FIFTEEN MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD: Mr. Bill Ross, Citizen, appeared before the Board to address his concerns regarding the request to display the Confederate Flag, which is on the agenda for the Board’s consideration. He asked the Board to give careful, thoughtful consideration about this, because once this is approved, anyone from any group can come in and do the same thing. ______(5) PUBLIC HEARINGS/PUBLIC APPEARANCES: (5a) A public hearing was held on Rezoning Application #RZ050002; Constantine Rosko. Philip Thompson, Director of Planning, appeared before the Board and reported that Constantine Rosko is requesting to rezone a portion of property (identified as Tax Map Number 114-A-82) from AR, Agricultural/Residential District, to AV, Agricultural Village Center District, on Forest Road (Route 221) in Goode. The property also falls within the Corridor Overlay District. The property is located on the south side of Forest Road (Route 221) approximately 0.27 mile east of the intersection of Forest Road and Bellevue Road (Route 643). The property proposed for rezoning contains approximately 72.3 acres, 24 acres is currently zoned AV, Agricultural Village Center District and 48.3 acres is currently zoned AR, Agricultural/Residential District. The request proposes to change the existing zoning from AR, Agricultural/Residential District to AV, Agricultural Village Center District. The developer has requested to rezone the property to provide a more consistently scaled development than the current zoning designation allows. The developer’s proposal includes 42 lots varying from 2.01 acres to 3.11 acres with the majority of the lots proposed being 2.01 acres in size. The proposal also includes the construction of three new local secondary roads. The developer states that the proposal will not 12/13/04 - 297 only allow for a more consistently scaled development, but will also allow the developer to provide larger, and therefore fewer overall lots, than what is allowed by the current zoning. The developer further states that the larger lots will likely result in up-scale homes being constructed, which would keep this development in character with the surrounding area. The requested zoning change prohibits many of the permitted uses on the property as a result of proffered zoning conditions. Sue Stephenson submitted a rezoning application on December 16, 2002, for this same property (RZ030001). The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on February 3, 2003, where the Planning Commission recommended denial of the application by a vote of 6-0. On February 6, 2003, a formal letter withdrawing the application was received from Ken McBride, Sue Stephenson’s agent. Mr. Thompson reported that a neighborhood informational meeting was held regarding the project on September 28, 2004, at the Otter River Elementary School with approximately 18 citizens in attendance. Staff explained the process, subdivision regulations, and the various uses that are allowed in the AR and AV Districts. The applicant’s agent, Mr. Russ Orrison, explained the plans for the property and asked the citizens for their input. The citizens present voiced many concerns. Concerns included: too much development being allowed in an area with an already overburdened water supply, increase on volunteer fire and rescue departments, trespassing onto adjacent farms and increased liability as a result, increased impact on schools, loss of privacy, noise, increase in traffic onto Route 221, potential build-out of the remaining property and an overall concern with allowing the placement of development in areas without adequate public infrastructure to support it. Mr. Thompson briefly discussed environmental conditions, transportation, utilities, public facilities, and visual impacts. Mr. Thompson reported that the Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 18, 2004. The Planning Commission discussed the application on November 1, 2004, and November 15, 2004. On November 15th, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed rezoning with proffers. There followed a brief question and answer session among the Board members and Mr. Thompson. Russell Orson appeared on behalf of Constantine Rosko, who is the landowner of this property. Mr. Orson stated all the details were in the packet the Board was given in their agenda packet. To address traffic concerns raised earlier, he stated the fifty-three lots had been reduced to forty-two; Mr. Orson feels this will also relieve some of the water table concerns. Mr. Wheeler then asked if the developer would agree to recommend to all buyers to drill a well prior to construction. Mr. Orson replied that he understood Mr. Wheeler’s concerns and that the developer would recommend drilling the well to be certain of a water supply prior to building. The County Attorney stated this is not legally binding upon the developer, as the question was not presented in the proper format at the proper time. Mr. Wheeler withdrew his question regarding drilling wells prior to construction, but Mr. Orson stated the developer would still recommend drilling prior to construction. Chairman Pollard then opened the public hearing to anyone wishing to speak. Nan Carmack, a former resident of Bellevue Road, addressed the Board regarding this rezoning application. She stated this request was denied over a year ago. This time around there are only five fewer lots that will be affected by the rezoning. With 500 lots in Bedford County for sale at this time, she asks that the Board not only deny the rezoning, but also to issue a moratorium on building in the area of Belleview Road, basing her concerns on a number of points. The first is a response of Bedford County Citizens to the citizen survey conducted by the County. That response demonstrated clearly a desire to maintain living space and the overall quality of this County. The area is surrounded by viable farming operations. She feels the development will 12/13/04 - 298 further endanger the safety of farm vehicles, hay trucks and others that currently traverse this narrow lane. She said that while it is described as a two-lane road, it is not possible for two cars to pass without traveling to the shoulders. She no longer walks her dog or rides her horse on this road for these reasons. Her children are not allowed to ride their bikes on this road for these reasons. Additionally, there is concern for an increased liability risk for farmers conducting agrarian affairs among suburban dwellers who may not understand the gravity of closing gates, of interacting with animals and the difficulty of maneuvering farm vehicles. Ms. Carmack stated the cows, horses and hay crops will cost the county far less than houses developed there. She stated the majority of the Planning Commission agreed there was no need for more types of this housing in this area. The Planning Commission agreed that AV zoning in Goode has created problems instead of answers. The Planning brought this developer back three times trying to find a way to lessen the impact on neighboring farms, and the majority of the Planning Commission expressed a desire to find a way out of this subdivision. But afraid to miss the opportunity to enforce proffers that went along with the request, it was granted. These proffers included setbacks, building materials, square footage, etc., which are all well and good, but offer no protection to the agri-business being conducted there. Another concern is the proffer of the easement for the widening of Bellevue Road – again, all well and good, but it will be up to VDOT and the taxpayers to actually accomplish this. Ms. Carmack said the second set of concerns regarding this property included water tabled, school crowding, uncontrolled growth and the inevitable raising of taxes. Other farmers have already been approached by developers with possibilities for their farms, and indeed, why should they not if this development is allowed to continue. The agricultural environment will already be ruined, the road will already be dangerous – why not turn over their beautiful acreage to the scavengers that exist. It is clear that allowing one development will pave the way for other, exacerbating the situation. The County has already expressed reluctance to gallop to the rescue when these farms run dry, as happened two years ago. The recent drought brought stress to all the wells in the area, and surely there will be droughts in the future. Perhaps the most compelling reason to deny this request and place a moratorium on building on this very small stretch of road in Bedford County relates to it’s historical aspect. Many historical homes are sighted on this one-mile stretch of road, two of which are already on the Historic Register. With this development, these homes will loose their historical context and be relegated to the backgrounds of our County’s historical resources. The Tribune stands empty because potential buyers don’t relish the idea of this development behind it. The Virginia Historical Commission has written to the Board on behalf of the preservation of this neighborhood (here Ms. Carmack read the letter from this commission to the Board, which the Board already has a copy of). Ms. Carmack ended by stating the Board has a chance here to preserve a piece of Bedford History, or have the responsibility for the destruction of these sites. This New York developer is not concerned with our historical resources, our natural resources or our argi- business. We have an opportunity to retain control over development in Bedford County tonight, or the opportunity to hand it over to out of state developers. Again she asked to deny this developer and issue a moratorium on building in this area. Rae Garland of Goode appeared representing the Board of the Bedford Historical Society, which has adopted a position opposing this rezoning for the reasons already stated by Ms. Carmack. He recognizes Bedford is between a rock and a hard place, the hard place being Lynchburg and the rock being Roanoke. Bedford will continue to be squeezed and the character of the County will be changed in the future. He pointed out the “lack of windfall” for Bedford County from suburban development. The tax revenue would only be several thousand dollars per year, with the average house bringing two school students. These expenses, along with the others services the County provides, could be substantial. He recommends, to the extent that we 12/13/04 - 299 can, to say no to suburban development, within reason. While Mr. Garland is representing the Bedford Historical Society, he wished to reiterate he is not condemning any property owner or developer who seeks the benefit of his property or benefit of his investment or entrepreneurship – we all want to succeed. But for Bedford County to succeed, it must go as slowly as possible in this direction. There being no one else desiring to speak, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Lowry stated he has spoken to many people in the area in question regarding this situation, and their opinion has been different from the opinion of those speaking tonight. Mr. Lowry further stated that, although he came tonight wanting to make a decision, he would like to have more time to consider what has been presented tonight. Mr. Wheeler requested clarification regarding the number of lots, asking if it would revert to fifty-three lots if the Board turned down the forty-two lots that were presented this evening. Chairman Pollard stated the use-by-right would be the fifty-three lots. Dr. Bashore requested clarification regarding the Boards ability to place a moratorium on building in the area in question. The County Attorney replied that the Board does not have this power. Supervisor Lowry made a motion that Rezoning Application #RZ050002 be tabled until the second Board Meeting in January 2005. Voting yes: Mr. Wheeler, Mr. Cheek, Dr. Bashore, Mr. Pollard, Mr. Lowry, Mr. Neudorfer and Mr. Arrington Voting no: None Adopted Unanimously. ______(5b) A public hearing was held on Special Use Permit #050004; Two K Properties, LC. Mr. Philip Thompson, Director of Planning, appeared before the Board and reported that Two K Properties, LC/Lindy Batten is requesting a Special Use Permit to allow construction sales and service in an Agricultural Village Center (AV) zoning district on Lynchburg Salem Turnpike (Route 460). The property owner/applicant is Two K Properties, LC/Lindy Batten, 1508 High Acre Road, Bedford, Virginia. The project planner/surveyor is Donnie Slusher, Slusher Surveying and Associates, P.C., P. O. Box 646, Bedford, Virginia 24523. The property (Tax Map Number 152-A-2A) is located on the north side of Lynchburg- Salem Turnpike (Route 460) approximately 0.06 mile northwest of the intersection of Blackwater Road (Route 668). The property address is 9628 East Lynchburg-Salem Turnpike. The property is approximately 6 acres. The request does not propose to change the existing zoning, but does request approval of a Special Use Permit to allow construction sales and service. The existing land use is Agricultural Services. The original use for this property was approved as a LUGS project in April 1998 (LUGS 97-15). Two buildings are located on the property. The main building is a total of 15,000 square feet (3,000 office/retail, 12,000 warehouse/storage). The accessory building of 9,000 square feet is used for covered storage. There are currently no plans to expand either building. The new tenant will sell aluminum siding, windows, doors, and assorted aluminum products. There will be no outdoor storage associated with this use. Mr. Thompson reported that the subject property is presently zoned AV (Agricultural Village Center) and R-1 (Low Density Residential) with the CO (Corridor Overlay). The R-1 zoning is on the back one-third of the property and the CO covers only 200’ back from Route 460. The Special Use Permit only applies to the portion of the property zoned AV (Agricultural Village Center). The current land use is agricultural services. The surrounding zoning is AV (Agricultural Village Center) and R-1 (Low Density Residential). The surrounding land uses are agricultural, residential, and commercial. The nearest residential use is approximately 500 feet to the east 1.24.2005 - 328

Voting yes: Mr. Wheeler, Mr. Cheek, Dr. Bashore, Mr. Pollard, Mr. Lowry, Mr. Neudorfer and Mr. Arrington Voting no: None Adopted Unanimously. ______CONSENT AGENDA BEDFORD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JANUARY 24, 2005

ITEM 1 RESOLUTIONS/MOTIONS a. Consideration Of A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION In The Amount of $200 For Volunteer Fire And Rescue Training b. Consideration Of A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION In The Amount Of $1,000 To Department 5512, V-Stop Grant, For FY 2004-2005, And Authorization To Accept The Domestic Violence V-Stop Program Grant In The Amount Of $12,155 c. Consideration Of A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION In The Amount Of $17,900 To Department 5514, Rural Domestic Violence And Child Victimization For FY 2004-2005, And Authorization to Accept The Rural Domestic Violence And Child Victimization Enforcement grant In The Amount Of $45,014 d. Consideration Of A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION In The Amount Of $3,149 To The Domestic Violence Program, Department 5511 For FY 2004-2005 e. Authorization To Accept The DMV Strike Force Mini-Grant, And Consideration Of A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION In The Amount Of $1,500 For This Grant To Department 3120, Sheriff – Law Enforcement, For FY 2004-2005 f. Authorization To Accept The DMV Office Safety On Strike Force Details Mini-Grant For SML, And Consideration Of A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION In The Amount Of $1,500 For this Grant To Department 3120, Sheriff – Law Enforcement, For FY 2004-05 g. Authorization To Accept The DMV Office Safety On Strike Force Details Mini-Grant, And Consideration Of A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION In The Amount Of $1,500 For This Grant To Department 3120, Sheriff – Law Enforcement, For FY 2004-2005. ACTION: Approve resolutions/motions as presented. (2) Supervisor Pollard made a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented. Voting yes: Mr. Wheeler, Mr. Cheek, Dr. Bashore, Mr. Pollard, Mr. Lowry, Mr. Neudorfer and Mr. Arrington Voting no: None Adopted Unanimously. ______(3) FIFTEEN MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD: Mary Conley, Citizen, appeared before the Board and discussed her concerns regarding Rezoning Application #050002 for Constantine Rosko. Ms. Conley feels there are loopholes in the application that would allow future property owners to build more than one house on their lots. She did not see the need for rezoning the lots, and believes the developer must have an unstated motive. Philip Thompson, Director of Planning, assured Ms. Conley and the Board no one would be allowed to build more than one house on each lot. Mr. Thompson further explained that, for the number of lots the developer is proposing, the current zoning is not adequate, which is why the zoning must be changed for the development to proceed. Ms. Conley then commented that three of the lots were currently impassable land and she did not understand how any homes could be built there. Chairman Cheek responded that this would be an issue for the developer to contend with, not the Board. 1.24.2005 - 329

Ms. Conley stated she was concerned that the proposed left turn lane for this development was not mentioned in the proffers. Mr. Thompson replied that if the resulting traffic from the development warrants it, a left turning lane would be considered at that time. Ronald Lovelace, Citizen, appeared before the Board to voice his support for this development. He lives on the same road where this development is planned, has attended the public hearing, and feels there has not been any alternatives that are better than what the developer is already proposing (including reasonable proffers and the reduction of lots from 53 to 42). He would rather the land remain just as it is, but feels that if there must be development, this is a good plan to go with. ______(4) PUBLIC HEARINGS/PUBLIC APPEARANCES: a. Mark Martin, Chairman of the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA), appeared before the Board to report on the BZA’s activities over the past year. Mr. Martin reported that the BZA held six meetings, five public hearings and four appeals to the zoning administrator. Mr. Martin reported they had one variance, which is evidence the zoning ordinance is working very well; this variance was approved. Sheila Persinger has been appointed to replace Mr. Huckabee. ______b. Bob Sutton, VDOT Resident Engineer, appeared before the Board to introduce Richard Caywood, Salem District Administrator. Mr. Caywood then addressed the Board, commenting on his desire to strengthen VDOT’s relationship with Bedford County. He stated that Bedford is where many of his high-priority projects for the region are located, and he is looking forward to working with Bedford in the future. Mr. Caywood is hoping that with the reduction of the ‘transportation debt’, they will be able to focus on the Route 221 corridor projects in the near future. The followed a brief question and answer period between Mr. Caywood and the Board. ______c. Chairman Cheek opened the discussion on road improvements (specifically Route 909, off of Route 460 in front of Walmart), reporting the County paid half of the money for this project, with the other half coming from VDOT. The concept of this project has previously been endorsed by the Board of Supervisors, as it opens up the area for commercial and economic development. It also reduces the numbers of entrances on Route 460 and eliminates lane changing and improves safety on the highway. Chairman Cheek then opened the public hearing on Route 909. Mike Dorsey, Director of Public Works, appeared before the Board to discuss the proposed road improvements, assisted by Brian Brander of Dewberry and Davis. Mr. Dorsey reviewed the details of the proposed design, and then Mr. Brander explained how first they would extend the right-turn lane on Route 460 that would feed into the new Route 909, and pointed out where access points to stores would be. Sue Montgomery, Director of Economic Development, expressed her concerns regarding the proposed design. Mrs. Montgomery stated that the Applebee’s project, once thought to be a dead issue, is now back on. This restaurant is expected to generate $123,000 to $125,000 in revenue, plus 75 jobs. Mrs. Montgomery asked the Board to be certain the proposed configuration for Route 909 will not create a negative impact on the Applebee’s project. In addition, there is another national chain expected to develop the site next to Applebee’s that may also suffer from the current design. Mr. Brander, who was involved in the Applebee’s design, stated that the County would be working with the developer to make a connection to Route 909 in order to make access both the Applebee’s property and the adjoining property easier to access. There followed a brief discussion between Mr. Brander, Mrs. Guzi, Attorney Boggess and the Board. J.A. Timmons, of Ted Counts Realty, stated they are working with the owner of the land across from Walmart. Mr. Timmons stated the Applebee’s deal is definite, and other development is being looked into. Mr. Timmons is strongly in favor of this project. There being no one else desiring to speak, the public hearing was closed. ______1.24.2005 - 331

Over the course of this year the EMS Community has requested and been provided a variety of courses required for certification as well as specialty classes to further their educational experience. The current budget of $20,000 has been expended through our efforts to offer more classes and increase enrollment in those traditionally sponsored; to continue into 2005 with scheduled courses will require additional funding. Vice-Chairman Lowry made a motion to transfer $10,000 from the Contingency Fund to the Department of Fire & Rescue Assistance Training Fund (00-3230-5-4133-002) in order to continue EMS Educational Programs. Voting yes: Mr. Wheeler, Mr. Cheek, Dr. Bashore, Mr. Pollard, Mr. Lowry, Mr. Neudorfer and Mr. Arrington Voting no: None Adopted Unanimously. ------b. Philip Thompson, Director of Planning, appeared before the Board regarding the Rezoning Application #RZ050002 for Constantine Rosko, which had been tabled from the December 13th, 2004 Board meeting for further consideration. Mr. Thompson clarified once these houses are built, the proffers would prevent anyone from building more than one house on each lot. There followed a discussion between Mr. Thompson, the Developer’s Agent, Attorney Boggess and the Board, as well as a citizen who stated she was against the development because this area is a historic district. Mr. Lowry made a motion to table this action until the first Board meeting in February. Voting yes: Mr. Wheeler, Mr. Cheek, Mr. Pollard, Mr. Lowry, Mr. Neudorfer and Mr. Arrington Voting no: Dr. Bashore Adopted. ______c. Supervisor Bashore made a motion that the Board of Supervisors convene into Closed Session pursuant to Virginia Code Section 2.2-3711 (A)(7) and Section 2.2-3711 (A)(1) for consultation with legal counsel and briefings by staff members pertaining to actual or probable litigation, where such consultation or briefing in open meeting would adversely affect the negotiating or litigating posture of the public body; specifically, claims presented by William and Anne Prince, and Maurice and Brenda Lockhart, and personnel, specifically the Building Official and the hiring of a new County Administrator. Voting yes: Mr. Wheeler, Mr. Cheek, Dr. Bashore, Mr. Pollard, Mr. Lowry, Mr. Neudorfer and Mr. Arrington Voting no: None Adopted Unanimously. ------Supervisor Bashore made a motion to go back into regular session. Voting yes: Mr. Wheeler, Mr. Cheek, Dr. Bashore, Mr. Pollard, Mr. Lowry, Mr. Neudorfer and Mr. Arrington Voting no: None Adopted Unanimously. ------Supervisor Bashore made a motion that in accordance with Section 2.2-3712.D the Board certifies that to the best of each member’s knowledge, only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements under this chapter and only such public business matters as were identified in the motion by which the closed session was convened, were heard, discussed or considered in the closed session by the Board. Voting yes: Mr. Wheeler, Mr. Cheek, Dr. Bashore, Mr. Pollard, Mr. Lowry, 2.14.2005 - 342

Supervisor Bashore made a motion to adopt the resolution requesting funds from the Commonwealth Transportation Board for a recreational access road into Falling Creek Park and funding a local match up to $75,000 in the Fiscal Year 2005-06 Capital Improvement Plan. Voting yes: Mr. Cheek, Dr. Bashore, Mr. Pollard, Mr. Neudorfer and Mr. Arrington Voting no: None Absent: Mr. Lowry, Mr. Wheeler Adopted Unanimously. ______(6b) Philip Thompson, Director of Planning, appeared before the Board and stated that on December 13, 2004, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on a rezoning application proposed by Constantine Rosko. The rezoning application requests to change the zoning designation of approximately 48.3 acres from AR, Agricultural/ Residential, to AV, Agricultural Village Center, to allow the construction of a 42-lot subdivision. The applicant already has approval of a preliminary subdivision plan for 53 lots for this property. The public hearing consisted of: a staff presentation outlining the staff report; a presentation by the applicant; public comments and testimony; and an opportunity for the applicant to address any comments made during the public hearing. After the public hearing, the Board of Supervisors postponed action on the application until its January 24, 2005 meeting. On January 24, 2005, the Board discussed the proposed rezoning application and postponed action until its February 14, 2005 meeting.

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND READOPT THE BEDFORD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT DESIGNATION OF A PORTION OF PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS TM#114-A-82 FROM AR, AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL, TO AV, AGRICULTURAL VILLAGE CENTER

BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED, that the Bedford County Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended and readopted by changing the zoning district designation of a portion of property identified as TM#114-A-82 from AR, Agricultural/Residential, to AV, Agricultural Village Center, with the following proffered conditions:

1. The property will be developed in substantial conformance with the submitted rezoning plan, revision dated 11-15-04, as prepared by Perkins & Orrison, Inc.

2. Uses for the proposed lots shall be limited to single family residential dwellings and residential accessory uses/structures.

3. No home shall be permitted to be constructed on any lot that contains less than 3,000 square feet of finished living space for a two story house, or 2,500 feet for a one story house.

4. Architectural standards for all homes and accessory structures are to be primarily brick or stone, with Hardi Plank or similar cement fiber siding product covering less than half of the building exterior. Architectural grade shingles or better roof material must be used. There shall be no exposed concrete CMU foundations. Homes shall be of a generally traditional appearance, in keeping with other finer homes in the area.

5. Along the Bellevue Road lots, the developer agrees to dedicate public right-of-way extending 25’ from the centerline.

6. The project will be developed in two phases: the first being the 12 lots along Bellevue Road, and the second being lots accessed off of Route 221 (not including the Trivium house).

7. A right turn lane and taper will be constructed on Route 221 at the proposed entrance.

8. Along the southern and eastern boundaries of the rezoned lots, a 50-foot buffer will remain undisturbed. If disturbance is required, then a double row of evergreen trees, 12’ on center, 6’ tall at planting, shall be installed along or near the property line for the entire length of the disturbed area.

Severability Should any portion or provision of this ordinance be held by any court to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole, or any part of the ordinance other than the part held to be unconstitutional or invalid.

Effective Date This ordinance is effective upon adoption. 2.14.2005 - 343

After reviewing the public testimony, the public record, the Planning Commission’s recommendation, the goals and objectives of the County’s Comprehensive Plan and Section 30-3 of the Zoning Ordinance, Supervisor Bashore made a motion to amend and readopt the Bedford County Zoning Ordinance by changing the zoning district designation of a portion of property identified as TM# 114-A-82 from AR, Agricultural/Residential, to AV, Agricultural Village Center, with proffers, as indicated on the attached ordinance. Voting yes: Mr. Cheek, Dr. Bashore, Mr. Pollard, Mr. Neudorfer and Mr. Arrington Voting no: None Absent: Mr. Lowry, Mr. Wheeler Adopted Unanimously. ______(6c) Kathleen Guzi, Interim County Administrator, appeared before the Board with a request for VDOT to transfer revenue sharing road funds as follows: Bedford County has several revenue sharing road projects underway and/or completed as summarized below:

Total Current Eng Project Project Route Name Allocation ($) Estimate Constructio Surplus Comments or n or Final Cost Cost ($) Deficit ($) 908 Mead Rd 255,301.48 Final Cost 248,845.55 + 6,455.93 Project complete 1310 Starling Ct 16,000.00 Final Cost 16,046.55 - 46.55 Project Complete 909 Hull St (W-M) 770,886 Eng 428,875 + 342,011 Est by Dewberry Estimate 911 Phillips Park Dr 250,000 Eng In pre-design Estimate phase 714 Falling Ck Pk/N 250,000 Eng 543,982 - 293,982 Est by WW Assoc Home Estimate

Based on the above project balances, it’s recommended that the Board consider requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to complete the following transfers:

(1) Transfer $6,455.93 from Route 908 (Mead Road) as follows – - $46.55 to Route 1310 (Starling Court) - $6,409.38 to Route 714 (Falling Creek Park/Nursing Home) (2) Transfer $300,000 from Route 909 (Hull Street/WalMart) to Route 714 (Falling Creek Park/Nursing Home)

The above transfers will close out the Mead Road and Starling Court projects, and provide $470,886 for the Hull Street project, and $556,409.38 for the Falling Creek Park/Nursing Home entrance project. The Phillips Park Drive project has $250,000 in funds but is in pre-design stage so an engineering estimate has not yet been completed. Mrs. Guzi pointed out that this money has already been transferred to VDOT – this motion now just officially moves this money for the final allocation. Supervisor Arrington made a motion to request VDOT to transfer revenue sharing road funds as shown. Voting yes: Mr. Cheek, Dr. Bashore, Mr. Pollard, Mr. Neudorfer and Mr. Arrington Voting no: None Absent: Mr. Lowry, Mr. Wheeler Adopted Unanimously. Following the vote there was a brief discussion between Mrs. Guzi and the Board. ______(6d) (This item was accidentally presented and voted on prior to item 6c) Michael Stokes, Director of Parks and Recreation, appeared before the Board with a request from the Moneta Area Recreation Association. Mr. Stokes stated the Moneta Recreation Association Board met and decided to use some of their funds to improve access to the fields at the back of the school. They spent $1,160.14 for materials to have steps built, leaving a balance of $8,093.26 in their CIP funding. Their Board was 6 6a

MMEMORANDUM

TO: Board of Supervisors

THROUGH: Mark K. Reeter, County Administrator

FROM: Susan Crawford, Director of Fiscal Management

DATE: August 26, 2014

SUBJECT: Personal Property Tax Relief

As part of the Budget process the Board will need to establish the Personal Property Tax Relief rate. This rate has not yet been set for the 2014 Personal Property Tax.

County Staff and the Commissioner of Revenue’s Office are working together to determine a revenue neutral Personal Property Tax Relief Percentage. We are in the process of running and analyzing several different relief percentages. The recommended revenue neutral relief percentage and relating resolution will be faxed to you prior to the September 8th meeting.

6b CCOOUUNNTTYY OOFF BBEEDDFFOORRD, VIRGINIA COUNTY OF BEDFORDD,, VVIIRRGGIINNIIAA COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MARK K. REETER

COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 122 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 202 FRANK J. ROGERS BEDFORD, VIRGINIA 24523 DEPUTY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ______

O FFICE OF C OUNTY A DMINISTRATOR

M E M O R A N D U M

To: Bedford County Board of Supervisors

From: Mark K. Reeter County Administrator

Date: September 8, 2014

Subject: Draft Resolution in Support of Proposed Passenger Rail Stop within Town of Bedford

The County is being requested by parties actively engaged in pursuing a passenger rail service stop within the Town of Bedford to adopt an additional Resolution expressing the Board of Supervisors' clear support for this proposal as being consistent with the County's Comprehensive Development Plan and in meeting the County’s needs and plans for growth and economic development. The Board's previous Resolution on this matter dated December 9, 2013 did not directly address these issues, but rather was more of a request at that time to the Virginia Department of Rails and Public Transportation to give consideration to such a stop as part of the implementation of passenger rail service planned between Lynchburg and Roanoke. A draft Resolution to this effect has been prepared and included herewith following this Memorandum. Also included are copies of the Board's 2013 Resolution and the Bedford Town Council's Resolution of July 22 of this year.

______

540-586-7601-TELEPHONE 540-586-0406-TELEFACSIMILIE [email protected] www.bedfordcountyva.gov Draft Resolution # R 090814-06 Page 1 of 1

At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Bedford, Virginia held at the Bedford County Administration Building on the 8th day of September, 2014, beginning at 7:30 p.m.:

1 A RESOLUTION 2 ENDORSING A RAIL PASSENGER STATION STOP IN THE TOWN OF BEDFORD 3 4 5 WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (hereinafter DRPT) has 6 announced that on or before the year 2017 rail passenger service will be extended to the City of 7 Roanoke, Virginia, passing through but not stopping in the Town of Bedford, Virginia, and 8 9 WHEREAS, passenger rail service to Bedford County, Virginia is included in the 2025 Bedford 10 County Comprehensive Plan, noting “...this service will not only spur commercial development in and 11 around the station locations but it will provide an invaluable transportation alternative to the citizens of 12 Bedford County.”, and 13 14 WHEREAS, citizens and citizen organizations of the Town of Bedford and Counties of Bedford 15 and Franklin, Virginia have expressed strong support for a rail passenger station stop in the Town of 16 Bedford, and 17 18 WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Bedford by Resolution dated July 22, 2014 has 19 endorsed the placement of a Bedford Town rail passenger rail station within the Town’s limits, and 20 21 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Bedford County views the placement of a Bedford 22 passenger rail station stop the Town of Bedford as a vital element in meeting the County’s current needs 23 and plans for growth and economic development, while serving the regional passenger rail transportation 24 needs and plans of Bedford and Franklin Counties; 25 26 27 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Bedford County Board of Supervisors that the Board does 28 hereby endorse the creation of a regional passenger rail station stop in the Town of Bedford and 29 the Bedford Town Council's Resolution of July 22, 2014, and authorizes County staff as may be 30 requested and appropriate to participate and assist in negotiations between the Town of Bedford, 31 Franklin County and citizen organizations thereof, the DRPT and officials of the Commonwealth 32 of Virginia and federal government to realize the aforementioned rail passenger station stop in 33 the Town of Bedford.

Resolution #R120913-09

At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Bedford, Virginia held at the Bedford County Administration Building on the 9th day of December 2013, beginning at 7:30 p.m. MEMBERS: VOTE: Steve Arrington, Chairman Yes John Sharp, Vice-Chairman Yes Bill Thomasson Yes Curry Martin Yes Roger W. Cheek Yes Annie S. Pollard Yes Tammy Parker Yes

On motion of Supervisor Pollard, which carried by a vote of 7-0, the following was adopted:

A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF CONSIDERATION BY THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF RAILS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION OF A PASSENGER RAIL STOP WITHIN THE TOWN OF BEDFORD IN BEDFORD COUNTY

WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Rails and Public Transportation (DRPT) is currently working with Norfolk Southern Railroad (NS) to evaluate the feasibility of extending passenger rail service between the Cities of Lynchburg and Roanoke, and

WHEREAS, such rail service route would traverse Bedford County and pass through the Town of Bedford, approximately equidistant between Lynchburg and Roanoke, and

WHEREAS, the Town of Bedford has expressed interest in being considered as a possible stop along this service route through recent communications with DPRT; and

WHEREAS, many citizens of Bedford County have expressed support for the possibility of a stop within this community as an additional mode of public transportation and to facilitate opportunities for economic development in both the Town and County; and

WHEREAS, by correspondence dated November 26, 2013, DPRT stated that "there are currently no plans for additional stations between Roanoke and Lynchburg or beyond", citing that "considerations for stations" include distances between existing stations, projected ridership, frequency of stops which affect scheduling, and cost of necessary track and station improvements as factors, and

WHEREAS, this correspondence did not provide any analysis of such considerations being fully evaluated with respect to a possible stop within the Town of Bedford;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Bedford County Board of Supervisors that the Board respectfully requests full and fair consideration by DPRT and NS as to the feasibility of a passenger rail stop within the Town of Bedford.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board also requests DRPT document and disclose its findings and conclusions with respect to the feasibility of a Bedford stop as soon as practical.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board directs a copy of this Resolution be forwarded to the Director of DRPT, the Town of Bedford, and Bedford County's representatives to the Virginia General Assembly and United States Congress.

A Copy-Teste:

Mark K. Reeter County Administrator

7 7a

DATE: AUGUST 20, 2014

TO: MR. MARK REETER, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, AND MEMBERS OF THE BEDFORD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

FROM: THE HONORABLE REBECCA C. JONES, MGT BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER

SUBJECT: TAX COLLECTIONS FOR PERIOD ENDING 6-30-14

In compliance with Section 58.1-3921 and 58.1-3924 of the Code of Virginia, I have prepared the following lists as of June 30, 2014.

1. Improper Assessments—None to report this year

2. Delinquent Real Estate taxes, including Roll Backs and Public Service Corporations

3. Delinquent Personal Property taxes, including tangible personal property, machinery and tools, merchants capital, and mobile homes

4. A list of uncollected balances of previously billed taxes amounting to less than five dollars each

5. As we bill all taxes assessed, a list of uncollected taxes amounting to less than five dollars each for which no bills were sent under Section 58.1-3912 is basically not needed although called for in the Code of Virginia.

The records of this office show the tax levy and collections, percent of collections at June 30, 2014, including supplemental assessments of real estate and personal property, roll- back taxes, and part-year taxes for real estate and mobile homes as per the attached schedules.

Real Estate Tax records are available for review or informational purposes upon your request. Personal Property Tax records may not be viewed by the public.

If you have any questions or would like an explanation on any of the schedules, please feel free to phone me or stop by my office.

Thank you for your service to Bedford County.

PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE June 30, 2007

TAX YEAR 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY 9,244,760.68 9,445,524.40 9,881,756.71 9,953,975.92 10,901,295.78 11,690,864.34

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (365,400.77) (274,716.30) (273,682.67) (274,627.62) (253,756.97) -261743.13

8,879,359.91 9,170,808.10 9,608,074.04 9,679,348.30 10,647,538.81 11,429,121.21

COLLECTIONS @6-30-07 (8,767,219.02) (9,054,495.80) (9,479,067.24) (9,547,257.31) (10,420,176.91) (11,027,125.20)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-07 112,140.89 116,312.30 129,006.80 132,090.99 227,361.90 401,996.01

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-07 98.74% 98.73% 98.66% 98.64% 97.86% 96.48%

NOTE: 2001 PERCENTAGE IS LESS THAN LAST YEAR DUE TO THE C.O.R. SUPPLE- MENTING $36,848.48 IN PPTRA BUSINESS- USE REVERSALS

2002--$39,070.74 AS ABOVE 2003--$50,466.65 AS ABOVE; PLUS ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENTS 2004--$56,160.79 AS ABOVE; PLUS ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENTS 2005--$147,795.11AS ABOVE; PLUS ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENTS PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE 12/31/2007 FOR COMP BRD BUDGET

TAX YEAR 2005

PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY 10,747,821.35

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (89,020.67)

10,658,800.68

COLLECTIONS @12-31-06 (10,332,218.65)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @12-31-06 326,582.03

% OF COLLECTIONS @12-31-06 96.94% PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE 12/31/2007 FOR COMP BRD BUDGET

2006 TAX YEAR

PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY 11,862,445.76

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (293,413.04)

11,569,032.72

COLLECTIONS @12-31-07 (11,274,577.29)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @12-31-07 294,455.43

% OF COLLECTIONS @12-31-07 97.45% BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES

June 30, 2008

TAX YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY 9,445,524.40 9,881,756.71 9,969,121.61 10,942,184.46 11,869,987.04 11,981,264.08

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (277,790.26) (277,934.53) (282,664.00) (275,439.51) (302,817.74) (254,840.54)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 9,167,734.14 9,603,822.18 9,686,457.61 10,666,744.95 11,567,169.30 11,726,423.54

COLLECTIONS @6-30-08 (9,063,407.29) (9,487,696.92) (9,573,806.67) (10,487,955.81) (11,361,658.44) (11,215,794.94)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-08 104,326.85 116,125.26 112,650.94 178,789.14 205,510.86 510,628.60

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-08 98.86% 98.79% 98.84% 98.32% 98.22% 95.65%

NOTES: TAX LEVY ADJUSTED FOR PPTRA BUSINESS USE REVERSALS & SUPPLEMENTAL BILLINGS 2006 $44,734.25 2007 14,926.10

RELIEF FOR THE ELDERLY--MOBILE HOMES 2006 $1,875.79 2007 3,099.25 BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS REAL ESTATE TAXES June 30, 2008

TAX YEAR 2003-1 2004-1 2005-1 2006-1 2007-1 2008-1

REAL ESTATE TAX LEVY 15,126,837.00 15,938,693.62 15,784,854.73 16,303,125.71 19,923,250.11 18,890,942.76

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (56,658.61) (677,086.10) (86,440.48) (61,524.64) (206,187.96) (122,230.98)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 15,070,178.39 15,261,607.52 15,698,414.25 16,241,601.07 19,717,062.15 18,768,711.78

COLLECTIONS @6-30-08 (15,058,242.58) (15,242,241.38) (15,655,749.37) (16,151,898.33) (19,476,950.64) (17,941,377.15)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-08 11,935.81 19,366.14 42,664.88 89,702.74 240,111.51 827,334.63

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-08 99.92% 99.87% 99.73% 99.45% 98.78% 95.59%

TAX YEAR 2003-2 2004-2 2005-2 2006-2 2007-2

REAL ESTATE TAX LEVY 12,188,466.27 13,865,292.69 14,384,363.80 15,063,283.43 16,591,860.44

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (5,150.71) (34,617.75) (74,691.34) (65,458.93) (12,598.04)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 12,183,315.56 13,830,674.94 14,309,672.46 14,997,824.50 16,579,262.40

COLLECTIONS @6-30-08 (12,169,872.82) (13,799,598.30) (14,255,350.90) (14,883,408.34) (16,233,929.16)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-08 13,442.74 31,076.64 54,321.56 114,416.16 345,333.24

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-08 99.89% 99.78% 99.62% 99.24% 97.92%

RELIEF FOR THE ELDERLY 2007-1 $107,624.05 2007-2 $107,894.31 2008-1 $100,570.04 BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES

June 30, 2009

TAX YEAR 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY 9,881,756.71 9,969,121.61 10,948,545.17 11,910,238.50 12,066,828.72 14,608,622.08

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (280,566.57) (285,775.36) (280,951.10) (320,184.59) (285,299.31) (491,453.16)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 9,601,190.14 9,683,346.25 10,667,594.07 11,590,053.91 11,781,529.41 14,117,168.92

COLLECTIONS @6-30-09 (9,492,464.06) (9,581,070.94) (10,506,945.73) (11,421,143.10) (11,524,645.30) (13,444,088.97)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-09 108,726.08 102,275.31 160,648.34 168,910.81 256,884.11 673,079.95

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-09 98.87% 98.94% 98.49% 98.54% 97.82% 95.23%

NOTES: TAX LEVY ADJUSTED FOR PPTRA BUSINESS USE REVERSALS & SUPPLEMENTAL BILLINGS 2006 $44,734.25 2007 14,926.10 2008 4,380.49

RELIEF FOR THE ELDERLY--MOBILE HOMES 2006 $1,875.79 2007 3,099.25 2008 2,955.53 BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS REAL ESTATE TAXES June 30, 2009

TAX YEAR 2004-1 2005-1 2006-1 2007-1 2008-1 2009-1

REAL ESTATE TAX LEVY 15,938,693.62 15,784,854.73 16,303,125.71 19,923,250.11 19,042,801.25 19,252,330.76

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (677,086.10) (86,440.48) (61,524.64) (206,257.59) (127,091.46) (152,915.05)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 15,261,607.52 15,698,414.25 16,241,601.07 19,716,992.52 18,915,709.79 19,099,415.71

COLLECTIONS @6-30-09 (15,247,208.49) (15,666,460.28) (16,176,039.86) (19,573,763.06) (18,629,097.73) (18,043,741.99)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-098 14,399.03 31,953.97 65,561.21 143,229.46 286,612.06 1,055,673.72

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-09 99.91% 99.80% 99.60% 99.27% 98.48% 94.47%

TAX YEAR 2004-2 2005-2 2006-2 2007-2 2008-2

REAL ESTATE TAX LEVY 13,865,292.69 14,384,363.80 15,063,283.43 16,592,386.68 16,921,071.93

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (34,617.75) (74,691.34) (65,458.93) (12,598.04) (6,413.24)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 13,830,674.94 14,309,672.46 14,997,824.50 16,579,788.64 16,914,658.69

COLLECTIONS @6-30-09 (13,806,570.94) (14,269,417.56) (14,918,359.49) (16,395,438.22) (16,476,100.54)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-098 24,104.00 40,254.90 79,465.01 184,350.42 438,558.15

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-09 99.83% 99.72% 99.47% 98.89% 97.41%

RELIEF FOR THE ELDERLY 2007-1 107,624.05 2007-2 107,894.31 2008-1 100,570.04 2008-2 100,570.04 2009-1 120,334.84 BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES

June 30, 2010

TAX YEAR 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY 9,969,121.61 10,948,545.17 11,914,910.04 12,079,498.16 14,650,749.36 12,336,089.11

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (287,608.32) (285,027.77) (323,458.54) (301,281.08) (496,033.65) (270,433.79)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 9,681,513.29 10,663,517.40 11,591,451.50 11,778,217.08 14,154,715.71 12,065,655.32

COLLECTIONS @6-30-10 (9,585,247.80) (10,520,090.29) (11,440,952.93) (11,575,255.06) (13,843,542.17) (11,462,015.46)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-10 96,265.49 143,427.11 150,498.57 202,962.02 311,173.54 603,639.86

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-10 99.01% 98.65% 98.70% 98.28% 97.80% 95.00%

NOTES: TAX LEVY ADJUSTED FOR PPTRA BUSINESS USE REVERSALS & SUPPLEMENTAL BILLINGS 2006 $44,734.25 2007 14,926.10 2008 27,626.28 2009 0.00

RELIEF FOR THE ELDERLY--MOBILE HOMES 2006 $1,875.79 2007 3,099.25 2008 2,955.53 2009 3,343.96 BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS REAL ESTATE TAXES June 30, 2010

TAX YEAR 2005-1 2006-1 2007-1 2008-1 2009-1 2010-1

REAL ESTATE TAX LEVY 15,784,854.73 16,303,125.71 19,928,392.33 19,050,595.06 19,324,772.33 19,387,963.83

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (86,440.48) (61,537.64) (207,250.21) (127,962.71) (162,079.55) (134,370.48)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 15,698,414.25 16,241,588.07 19,721,142.12 18,922,632.35 19,162,692.78 19,253,593.35

COLLECTIONS @6-30-10 (15,681,923.12) (16,207,371.81) (19,641,264.45) (18,765,924.50) (18,780,691.21) (18,139,307.61)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-10 16,491.13 34,216.26 79,877.67 156,707.85 382,001.57 1,114,285.74

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-10 99.89% 99.79% 99.59% 99.17% 98.01% 94.21%

TAX YEAR 2005-2 2006-2 2007-2 2008-2 2009-2

REAL ESTATE TAX LEVY 14,384,363.80 15,063,283.43 16,592,386.68 16,922,137.93 19,290,155.39

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (74,691.34) (65,471.93) (13,446.54) (7,284.49) (163,171.43)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 14,309,672.46 14,997,811.50 16,578,940.14 16,914,853.44 19,126,983.96

COLLECTIONS @6-30-10 (14,289,339.22) (14,949,731.48) (16,468,170.00) (16,705,138.44) (18,630,183.07)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-10 20,333.24 48,080.02 110,770.14 209,715.00 496,800.89

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-10 99.86% 99.68% 99.33% 98.76% 97.40%

RELIEF FOR THE ELDERLY 2007-1 107,624.05 2007-2 107,894.31 2008-1 100,570.04 2008-2 100,521.04 2009-1 120,334.84 2009-2 120,180.66 2010-1 124,777.27 BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES

June 30, 2011

TAX YEAR 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY 10,948,545.17 11,914,910.04 12,083,634.96 14,668,796.02 12,399,368.05 12118631.84

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (290,389.35) (329,128.09) (308,662.21) (510,373.12) (278,458.86) (275,897.58)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 10,658,155.82 11,585,781.95 11,774,972.75 14,158,422.90 12,120,909.19 11,842,734.26

COLLECTIONS @6-30-11 (10,525,602.68) (11,449,081.18) (11,589,627.45) (13,912,147.60) (11,825,501.75) (11,297,712.54)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-11 132,553.14 136,700.77 185,345.30 246,275.30 295,407.44 545,021.72

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-11 98.76% 98.82% 98.43% 98.26% 97.56% 95.40%

NOTES: TAX LEVY ADJUSTED FOR PPTRA BUSINESS USE REVERSALS & SUPPLEMENTAL BILLINGS 2006 $44,734.25 2009 68,372.07 2007 15,266.54 2010 699.64 2008 30,234.86

RELIEF FOR THE ELDERLY--MOBILE HOMES 2006 $1,875.79 2009 3,343.96 2007 3,099.25 2010 4,058.37 2008 2,955.53 BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS REAL ESTATE TAXES June 30, 2011

TAX YEAR 2006-1 2007-1 2008-1 2009-1

REAL ESTATE TAX LEVY 16,303,125.71 19,928,392.33 19,050,595.06 19,328,400.86

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (61,547.39) (207,262.71) (127,975.21) (163,960.34)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 16,241,578.32 19,721,129.62 18,922,619.85 19,164,440.52

COLLECTIONS @6-30-11 (16,222,324.23) (19,666,754.39) (18,831,120.78) (18,965,919.19)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-11 19,254.09 54,375.23 91,499.07 198,521.33

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-11 99.88% 99.72% 99.52% 98.96%

TAX YEAR 2006-2 2007-2 2008-2 2009-2

REAL ESTATE TAX LEVY 15,063,283.43 16,594,569.68 16,925,565.36 19,292,082.86

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (65,481.68) (15,359.04) (9,386.39) (166,700.80)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 14,997,801.75 16,579,210.64 16,916,178.97 19,125,382.06

COLLECTIONS @6-30-11 (14,971,352.80) (16,508,487.64) (16,789,985.53) (18,872,122.82)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-11 26,448.95 70,723.00 126,193.44 253,259.24

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-11 99.82% 99.57% 99.25% 98.68%

RELIEF FOR THE ELDERLY 2007-1 107,624.05 2007-2 2008-1 100,570.04 2008-2 2009-1 120,334.84 2009-2 2010-1 124,777.27 2010-2 2011-1 132,682.02 2010-1 2011-1

19,477,384.22 18,695,985.50

(140,058.16) (149,327.80)

19,337,326.06 18,546,657.70

(18,930,129.75) (17,645,166.29)

407,196.31 901,491.41

97.89% 95.14%

2010-2

19,431,687.27

(154,844.84)

19,276,842.43

(18,772,212.06)

504,630.37

97.38%

107,894.31 100,521.04 120,180.66 124,777.27 BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES

June 30, 2012

TAX YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY 12,083,634.96 14,671,395.36 12,409,269.17 12,142,486.99 13,158,271.34

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (309,706.74) (516,473.61) (300,099.21) (282,167.71) (285,516.62)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 11,773,928.22 14,154,921.75 12,109,169.96 11,860,319.28 12,872,754.72

COLLECTIONS @6-30-12 (11,601,203.15) (13,944,021.29) (11,879,168.14) (11,587,723.90) (12,232,834.11)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-12 172,725.07 210,900.46 230,001.82 272,595.38 639,920.61

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-12 98.53% 98.51% 98.10% 97.70% 95.03%

NOTES: TAX LEVY ADJUSTED FOR PPTRA BUSINESS USE REVERSALS & SUPPLEMENTAL BILLINGS 2006 $44,734.25 2009 68,907.71 2007 15,266.54 2010 27,550.58 2008 30,251.04 2011 9,406.41

RELIEF FOR THE ELDERLY--MOBILE HOMES 2006 $1,875.79 2009 3,343.96 2007 3,099.25 2010 4,058.37 2008 2,955.53 2011 3,187.00 BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS REAL ESTATE TAXES June 30, 2012

TAX YEAR 2007-1 2008-1 2009-1 2010-1 2011-1 2012-1

REAL ESTATE TAX LEVY 19,928,392.33 19,050,595.06 19,328,400.86 19,477,448.72 18,799,964.72 18,958,539.50

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (207,262.71) (127,975.21) (163,960.34) (140,074.41) (166,710.51) (231,072.77)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 19,721,129.62 18,922,619.85 19,164,440.52 19,337,374.31 18,633,254.21 18,727,466.73

COLLECTIONS @6-30-12 (19,685,357.52) (18,861,892.56) (19,060,535.06) (19,131,990.63) (18,298,018.88) (17,830,498.20)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-12 35,772.10 60,727.29 103,905.46 205,383.68 335,235.33 896,968.53

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-12 99.82% 99.68% 99.46% 98.94% 98.20% 95.21%

TAX YEAR 2007-2 2008-2 2009-2 2010-2 2011-2 2012-2

REAL ESTATE TAX LEVY 16,594,569.68 16,925,565.36 19,292,172.86 19,431,777.27 18,726,879.06 18,966,729.45

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (15,359.04) (9,386.39) (166,700.80) (155,363.63) (175,205.66) (230,512.77)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 16,579,210.64 16,916,178.97 19,125,472.06 19,276,413.64 18,551,673.40 18,736,216.68

COLLECTIONS @6-30-12 (16,529,762.28) (16,836,118.95) (18,973,725.74) (19,019,470.38) (18,096,802.24) (2,422,175.41)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-12 49,448.36 80,060.02 151,746.32 256,943.26 454,871.16 16,314,041.27

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-12 99.70% 99.53% 99.21% 98.67% 97.55% 12.93%

RELIEF FOR THE ELDERLY: 2007-1 107,624.05 2007-2 107,894.31 RELIEF DOES NOT INCLUDE 2008-1 100,570.04 2008-2 100,521.04 BOARD REFUNDS APPROVED 2009-1 120,334.84 2009-2 120,180.66 AFTER INITIAL ASSESSMENTS 2010-1 124,777.27 2010-2 124,777.27 2011-1 132,682.02 2011-2 132,682.02 2012-1 32,389.75 2012-2 32,389.75 VETERANS' RELIEF: 2011 MOST BY BOARD REFUND AS THE LAW WAS PASSED LATE WITH INITIAL BILLING 2012-1 32,389.75 2012-2 32,389.75 PLUS BOARD REFUNDS RETRO TO 1-1-11 FOR THOSE VETERANS STILL COMPLETING PAPERWORK PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS REAL ESTATE TAXES BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE 12/31/2012 FOR COMP BOARD 2013 BUDGET

2011-2 TAX YEAR

REAL ESTATE TAX LEVY 18,728,378.06

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (175,631.66)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 18,552,746.40

COLLECTIONS @12-31-12 (18,219,434.97)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @12-31-12 333,311.43

% OF COLLECTIONS @12-31-12 98.20% PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE 12/31/2012 FOR COMP BOARD 2013 BUDGET

2011 TAX YEAR

PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY 13,207,522.26

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (297,905.93)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 12,909,616.33

COLLECTIONS @12-31-12 (12,473,927.21)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @12-31-12 435,689.12

% OF COLLECTIONS @12-31-12 96.63% BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES June 30, 2013

TAX YEAR 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY 14,671,395.36 12,415,853.77 12,152,614.08 13,192,650.80 13,702,851.42

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (518,904.35) (305,022.49) (291,441.82) (291,180.99) (278,939.81)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 14,152,491.01 12,110,831.28 11,861,172.26 12,901,469.81 13,423,911.61

COLLECTIONS @6-30-13 (13,964,752.38) (11,910,219.25) (11,644,069.29) (12,609,071.02) (12,874,981.36)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-13 187,738.63 200,612.03 217,102.97 292,398.79 548,930.25

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-13 98.67% 98.34% 98.17% 97.73% 95.91%

NOTES: TAX LEVY ADJUSTED FOR PPTRA BUSINESS USE REVERSALS & SUPPLEMENTAL BILLINGS 2006 $44,734.25 2,009.00 68,907.71 2012 1,193.69 2007 15,266.54 2,010.00 27,550.58 2008 30,251.04 2,011.00 21,986.28

RELIEF FOR THE ELDERLY--MOBILE HOMES 2006 $1,875.79 3,343.96 2012 3,601.48 2007 3,099.25 4,058.37 2008 2,955.53 3,187.00 BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS REAL ESTATE TAXES June 30, 2013

TAX YEAR 2008-1 2009-1 2010-1 2011-1 2012-1 2013-1

REAL ESTATE TAX LEVY 19,050,595.06 19,328,400.86 19,477,600.22 18,800,621.47 19,027,789.00 19,019,929.79

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (127,975.21) (163,960.59) (140,254.41) (167,800.70) (240,831.26) (166,387.65)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 18,922,619.85 19,164,440.27 19,337,345.81 18,632,820.77 18,786,957.74 18,853,542.14

COLLECTIONS @6-30-13 (18,880,717.44) (19,100,873.36) (19,218,525.38) (18,444,646.77) (18,473,501.95) (17,836,859.48)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-13 41,902.41 63,566.91 118,820.43 188,174.00 313,455.79 1,016,682.66

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-13 99.78% 99.67% 99.39% 98.99% 98.33% 94.61%

TAX YEAR 2008-2 2009-2 2010-2 2011-2 2012-2 2013-2

REAL ESTATE TAX LEVY 16,925,565.36 19,292,172.86 19,431,777.27 18,725,107.63 18,984,925.15 19,019,929.79

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (9,386.39) (166,701.05) (155,543.63) (176,192.82) (239,208.52) (166,387.65)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 16,916,178.97 19,125,471.81 19,276,233.64 18,548,914.81 18,745,716.63 18,853,542.14

COLLECTIONS @6-30-13 (16,862,414.66) (19,033,785.53) (19,123,904.98) (18,319,083.73) (18,344,630.77) (2,638,398.69)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-13 53,764.31 91,686.28 152,328.66 229,831.08 401,085.86 16,215,143.45

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-13 99.68% 99.52% 99.21% 98.76% 97.86% 13.99%

RELIEF FOR THE ELDERLY: 2007-1 107,624.05 2007-2 107,894.31 RELIEF DOES NOT INCLUDE 2008-1 100,570.04 2008-2 100,521.04 BOARD REFUNDS APPROVED 2009-1 120,334.84 2009-2 120,180.66 AFTER INITIAL ASSESSMENTS 2010-1 124,777.27 2010-2 124,777.27 2011-1 132,682.02 2011-2 132,682.02 2012-1 113,929.31 2012-2 113,929.31 2013-1 111,658.75 2013-2 111,658.75 VETERANS' RELIEF: 2011 MOST BY BOARD REFUND AS THE LAW WAS PASSED LATE WITH INITIAL BILLING 2012-1 32,389.75 2012-2 32,389.75 PLUS BOARD REFUNDS RETRO TO 1-1-11 FOR THOSE VETERANS STILL COMPLETING PAPERWORK 2013-1 38,018.22 2013-2 38,018.22 PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS REAL ESTATE TAXES BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE 12/31/2013 FOR COMP BOARD 2013 BUDGET

2012-2 TAX YEAR

REAL ESTATE TAX LEVY 18,984,925.15

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (239,208.52)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 18,745,716.63

COLLECTIONS @12-31-13 (18,446,509.38)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @12-31-13 299,207.25

% OF COLLECTIONS @12-31-13 98.40% PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE 12/31/2013 FOR COMP BOARD 2013 BUDGET

2012 TAX YEAR

PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY 13,782,661.10

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (295,805.70)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 13,486,855.40

COLLECTIONS @12-31-13 (13,128,059.43)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @12-31-13 358,795.97

% OF COLLECTIONS @12-31-13 97.34% BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES June 30, 2014

TAX YEAR 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY 12,415,853.77 12,157,285.77 13,203,317.68 13,747,314.63 13,752,289.42

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (308,591.98) (295,686.11) (300,596.50) (261,768.49) (269,951.94)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 12,107,261.79 11,861,599.66 12,902,721.18 13,485,546.14 13,482,337.48

COLLECTIONS @6-30-14 (11,927,595.13) (11,671,949.36) (12,671,396.81) (13,223,304.68) (12,980,836.61)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-14 179,666.66 189,650.30 231,324.37 262,241.46 501,500.87

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-14 98.52% 98.40% 98.21% 98.06% 96.28%

NOTES: TAX LEVY ADJUSTED FOR PPTRA BUSINESS USE REVERSALS & SUPPLEMENTAL BILLINGS 2006 $44,734.25 2,009.00 68,907.71 2012 45,240.29 2007 15,266.54 2,010.00 27,658.84 2013 * NONE to date 2008 30,251.04 2,011.00 22,273.15

RELIEF FOR THE ELDERLY--MOBILE HOMES 2006 $1,875.79 3,343.96 2012 3,601.48 2007 3,099.25 4,058.37 2013 3,847.86 2008 2,955.53 3,187.00

*COMMISSIONER HAS DONE NO PPTRA REVERSALS AS OF 6-30-14 FOR 2013 BEDFORD COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE REAL ESTATE TAXES PERCENT OF COLLECTIONS June 30, 2014

TAX YEAR 2009-1 2010-1 2011-1 2012-1 2013-1 2014-1

REAL ESTATE TAX LEVY 19,328,400.86 19,477,600.22 18,800,751.47 19,029,028.72 19,106,695.54 21,086,569.10

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (163,960.59) (140,254.41) (167,800.70) (240,837.51) (173,634.97) ( 198,629.06)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 19,164,440.27 19,337,345.81 18,632,950.77 18,788,191.21 18,933,060.57 20,887,940.04

COLLECTIONS @6-30-14 (19,119,578.63) (19,251,731.15) (18,501,233.37) (18,593,487.93) (18,606,132.16) (19,981,775.63)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-14 44,861.64 85,614.66 131,717.40 194,703.28 326,928.41 906,164.41

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-14 99.77% 99.56% 99.29% 98.96% 98.27% 95.66%

TAX YEAR 2009-2 2010-2 2011-2 2012-2 2013-2 2014-2 DUE 12-5-14

REAL ESTATE TAX LEVY 19,292,172.86 19,431,777.27 18,725,107.63 18,984,925.15 19,051,951.33 21,086,569.10

ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENTS (166,701.05) (155,543.63) (176,192.82) (239,214.77) (175,280.68) (198,629.66)

ADJUSTED TAX LEVY 19,125,471.81 19,276,233.64 18,548,914.81 18,745,710.38 18,876,670.65 20,887,939.44

COLLECTIONS @6-30-14 (19,059,809.45) (19,170,327.79) (18,399,681.04) (18,520,331.37) (18,574,002.44) (2,854,144.66)

UNCOLLECTED BALANCE @6-30-14 65,662.36 105,905.85 149,233.77 225,379.01 302,668.21 18,033,794.78

% OF COLLECTIONS @6-30-14 99.66% 99.45% 99.20% 98.80% 98.40% 13.66%

RELIEF FOR THE ELDERLY: 2007-1 107,624.05 2007-2 107,894.31 RELIEF DOES NOT INCLUDE 2008-1 100,570.04 2008-2 100,521.04 BOARD REFUNDS APPROVED 2009-1 120,334.84 2009-2 120,180.66 AFTER INITIAL ASSESSMENTS 2010-1 124,777.27 2010-2 124,777.27 2011-1 132,682.02 2011-2 132,682.02 2012-1 113,929.31 2012-2 113,929.31 2013-1 111,658.75 2013-2 111,658.75 2014-1 137,047.48 2014-2 137,047.48 VETERANS' RELIEF: 2011 MOST BY BOARD REFUND AS THE LAW WAS PASSED LATE WITH INITIAL BILLING 2012-1 32,389.75 2012-2 32,389.75 PLUS BOARD REFUNDS RETRO TO 1-1-11 FOR THOSE VETERANS STILL COMPLETING PAPERWORK 2013-1 38,018.22 2013-2 38,018.22 2014-1 48,683.14 2014-2 48,683.14 7b MINUTES For Bedford County Planning Commission June 17,2014

The Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, June 17, 2014 in the Bedford County Administration Building Boardroom. Commissioners Brown, Huff, Noell, Scott and Tillett were present. Commissioners Burdett and Craig were absent. Staff present was County Attorney Mr. Carl Boggess, Mr. Jordan Mitchell, Planner and Mrs. Patricia Robinson, Planning/Zoning Technician.

Mr. Scott called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm and determined there was a quorum for conducting business. Mr. Scott asked if there were any changes to the agenda. There being none the agenda was approved by acclamation.

Mr. Scott asked if there were any changes to the minutes of May 5, 2014 and May 20, 2014.

Mr. Tillett made a motion to approve the minutes of May 5 and May 20, 2014 as presented. Mr. Noell seconded the motion.

Voting yes: Mr. Brown, Mr. Huff, Mr. Noell, Mr. Tillett and Mr. Scott

Voting no: None

Motion passed 5-0

Mr. Scott asked if there were any citizens to speak during the Citizen's Comment Period. There being no speakers, the Citizen's Comment Period was closed.

Mr. Scott moved to Item 4a under Old Business. Item 4a was a discussion of the process through which the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Maps (FLUM) will be reviewed. Mr. Mitchell noted he included in the meeting packet three Future Land Use Maps. One was for the entire county, one of the Smith Mountain Lake area and one of the Goode area. Mr. Mitchell handed out to the Commissioners an overall county map which depicted road points to aid in the review of the map. He noted at the Commission's meeting next meeting staff would like to concentrate on the maps of the Smith Mountain Lake and Goode areas. Staff is of the opinion these are two areas on the maps that may need some adjustments. Staff will have larger maps of the current zoning, Bedford Regional Water Authority proposed water and sewer lines and the Future Land Use Maps available at the next meeting for the Commissioners use. Mr. Mitchell noted suggestions of adjustments to the maps could come from Commissioners or staff. Mr. Boggess asked that during the Commission's review of the maps that they keep future rezoning applications in mind. Anytime a rezoning comes before the Commission it not only should fit with the Comprehensive Plan but it should also dovetail with the Future Land Use Map. Mr. Boggess noted each of the Commissioners will have a better idea of the growth trends for their districts. Mr. Boggess stated the review of the maps is not to be parcel specific but to reflect projected trends in the county. Mr. Mitchell stated upon

Planning Commission Minutes 1 06/17/14 completion of the Future Land Use map review, the Planning Commission will forward their recommendation on the Comprehensive Plan to the Board of Supervisors for their consideration. The recommendation will include the amended text and the proposed Future Land Use Map.

Mr. Scott moved to Item 5a under New Business. Item 5a was a variance application presented to the Planning Commission as required by both the Code of Virginia and the Bedford County Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Commission is not required to take any action on the application, but at its discretion may send a recommendation to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). Mr. Boggess provided a brief background regarding the variance requests from the Bedford Regional Water Authority (BRWA). Mr. Boggess suggested the Commission may want to make a recommendation to the BZA on this application. Mr. Mitchell noted the BRWA is requesting variances to the side and front yard setbacks and lot coverage. The original facility was approved under the Land Use Guidance System (LUGS). At the time of the approval side and rear yard setbacks were not regulated. Additionally lot and building coverage were not regulated. The site did comply with the front setback. In 1998 the use became nonconforming with the adoption of traditional zoning. The request is to enlarge the intake site as part of the Bedford City to town reversion agreement. This is the only site they have approval on from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to use for the intake facility. BRWA is working with the High Point Homeowners Association for a lease area on the property. If the BZA grants the requested variances, the BRWA will still be required to apply for the applicable Special Use Permits which will come before the Commission for consideration. Mr. Mitchell stated the BRWA does have support of the High Point Homeowners Association and that he has not received any calls or correspondence in opposition to the requested variances.

Mr. Brown made a motion recommending the Board of Zoning Appeals grant the requested variances for application VP140002. Mr. Tillett seconded the motion.

Voting yes: Mr. Brown, Mr. Huff, Mr. Noell, Mr. Tillett and Mr. Scott

Voting no: None

Motion passed 5-0

Mr. Scott moved to Item 5b under New Business. Item 5b regarded the election of a Secretary to the Planning Commission. Mr. Boggess stated by law the Subdivision Agent as well as the Zoning Administrator is the County Administrator. Previously these duties were delegated to Mr. Wilson, Director of Community Development. Due to Mr. Wilson's resignation Mr. Boggess suggested appointing Mr. Mark K. Reeter, County Administrator as the Secretary to the Planning Commission until such time as there is a new Director of Community Development.

Mr. Noell made a motion to appoint Mr. Mark K. Reeter, County Administrator as the Secretary to the Planning Commission. Mr. Tillett seconded the motion.

Voting yes: Mr. Brown, Mr. Huff, Mr. Noell, Mr. Tillett and Mr. Scott

Planning Commission Minutes 2 06/17/14 Voting no: None

Motion passed 5-0

Mr. Scott moved to Item 5c under New Business. Item 5c was to consider changing the July 1, 2014 meeting to July 8,2014 and to determine a starting time. Mr. Boggess noted this would be a work session to review the Future Land Use Map. Mr. Boggess stated Mr. Mitchell and Mr. Huff cannot be present at the meeting if held on July 1,2014.

Mr. Huff made a motion the Planning Commission cancels their meeting of July 1, 2014 and to schedule a work session for July 8, 2014 with the work session beginning at 5:30 pm. Mr. Tillett seconded the motion.

Voting yes: Mr. Brown, Mr. Huff, Mr. Noell, Mr. Tillett and Mr. Scott

Voting no: None

Motion passed 5-0

Mr. Boggess noted the Planning Commission will meet on July 8 and are then scheduled to meet the following Tuesday, July 15, 2014. The Commission is scheduled to conduct a public hearing for an amendment to a previously approved rezoning application. The applicant is requesting to remove proffers he voluntarily offered at the time the rezoning application was approved.

There being no additional business, the meeting was adjourned by consensus at 7:27 pm.

Respectfully submitted,

'Mark. K. Reet^5 Secretary

Approved by:

Tomrr^SpottTVice Chairman

Planning Commission Minutes 3 06/17/14 MINUTES For Bedford County Planning Commission July 8,2014

The Planning Commission held a work session on Tuesday, July 8, 2014 in the Bedford County Administration Building Ground Floor Training Room for the purpose of reviewing the Future Land Use Map for the Comprehensive Plan Update at 5:35 pm. Commissioners Brown, Burdett, Craig, Huff, Noell, Scott, and Tillett were present. County staff present was Mr. Jordan Mitchell, Planner and Mr. Carl Boggess, County Attorney.

Mr. Craig declared a quorum to conduct business with all seven Planning Commissioners present. The agenda was approved by the Planning Commission by acclamation.

Mr. Craig moved discussion to Old Business. Discussion of Item 2a - Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (FLUM) review began with Mr. Mitchell introducing the maps that were on display for the Commission and the handouts of specific areas of staff concern in Bedford County. The Commission reviewed the FLUM and urban development areas and made several adjustments that will be presented to the Planning Commission at their August 5,2014 meeting to finalize.

Mr. Boggess informed the Commission that they would have public hearings at both of their meetings in the month on August, noting that this would be different than just having public hearings at their second meeting. Mr. Boggess suggested that the Commission cancel their next meeting (July 15, 2014). Mr. Burdett stated that he thought they were going to have a public hearing at their July 15, 2014 meeting. Mr. Boggess responded that there was a change to the application that postponed the public hearing date to their first meeting in August. Mr. Boggess stated at their second meeting in August they will have two public hearings for the Bedford Regional Water Authority (BRWA) water treatment plant and water intake sites. The Commission cancelled their July 15,2014 meeting.

There being no additional business, the meeting was adjourned by consensus at 7:33 pm.

Respectfully submitted,

Secretary

Approved by:

Jerr£lCraig,(&hairman7\^

Planning Commission Minutes 1 07/08/14 MINUTES For Bedford County Planning Commission August 5,2014

The Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, August 5, 2014 in the Bedford County Administration Building Boardroom. Commissioners Brown, Burdett, Huff, Noell, Scott, Tillett and Craig were present. Staff present was County Attorney Mr! Carl Boggess, Mr. Jordan Mitchell, Mr. Brad Robinson, Planners and Mrs. Patricia Robinson, Planning/Zoning Technician.

Mr. Craig called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm and determined there was a quorum for conducting business. Mr. Craig asked if there were any changes to the agenda. Mr. Huff made a motion to approve the agenda as presented. Mr. Tillett seconded the motion. The motion passed with a vote of 7-0.

Mr. Craig asked if there were any changes to the minutes of June 17, 2014. Mr. Burdett requested the following changes: (1) page 1 line 33 change the word "not" to "noted", (2) page 2 line 67 delete the word "to" prior to the word "approval" and (3) page 3 line 119 change the word "hear" to "hearing".

Mr. Burdett made a motion to approve the minutes of June 17, 2014 as amended. Mr. Huff seconded the motion.

Voting yes: Mr. Brown, Mr. Burdett, Mr. Huff, Mr. Noell, Mr. Tillett and Mr. Scott

Voting no: None

Abstaining: Mr. Craig (not present at the meeting)

Motion passed 6-0-1

Mr. Craig asked if there were any changes to the minutes of July 8, 2014. Mr. Burdett requested the following changes: (1) page 1 line 20 delete the word "in" and (2) page 1 line 21 add the word "meeting" after "2014".

Mr. Scott made a motion to approve the minutes of July 8, 2014 as amended. Mr. Brown seconded the motion.

Voting yes: Mr. Brown, Mr. Burdett, Mr. Huff, Mr. Noell, Mr. Scott, Mr. Tillett and Mr. Craig

Voting no: None

Motion passed 7-0

Planning Commission Minutes \ 08/05/14 Mr. Craig asked if there were any citizens to speak during the Citizen's Comment Period. There being no speakers, the Citizen's Comment Period was closed.

Mr. Craig moved to Item 4a under Public Hearing. Item 4a was Rezoning application RZ140006. Mr. Brad Robinson stated the applicant and property owner is Constantine Rosko, 48 Old Trail Road, Watermill, NY 11976. The subject parcel is identified as Tax Map 114-A-82 and located along the south side of Forest Road (Route 221) approximately 0.1 miles north/east of the intersection with Bellevue Road (Route 643). The parcel is a total of'72.67 acres according to county real estate information. The agent and engineer for the applicant is Russell H. Orrison of Perkins & Orrison, 17 West Nelson Street, Lexington, VA 24450. Constantine Rosko is requesting to amend proffers associated with phased development of Tax Map 114-A-82. The request would result in the removal of three proffers as applied to the second phase. Tax Map 114-A-82 is currently zoned entirely AV as a result of rezoning application #RZ050002 in 2005. Prior to 2005 the property was split-zoned AV and AR (Agricultural/Residential District). Proffers were approved with the previous rezoning request, which included the following: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformance with the submitted rezoning plan, revision dated November 15, 2004, as prepared by Perkins & Orrison, Inc. 2. Uses for the proposed lots shall be limited to single family residential dwellings and residential accessory uses/structures. 3. No home shall be permitted to be constructed on any lot that contains less than 3,000 square feet of finished living space for a two story house, or 2,500 square feet for a one story house. 4. Architectural standards for all homes and accessory structures are to be primarily brick or stone, with Hardi Plank or similar cement fiber siding product covering less than half of the building exterior. Architectural grade shingle or better roof material must be used. There shall be no exposed concrete CMU foundations. Homes shall be of a generally traditional appearance, in keeping with other finer homes in the area. 5. Along the Bellevue Road lots, the developer agrees to dedicate public right-of- way extending 25 feet from the centerline. 6. The project will be developed in two phases: The first being the 12 lots along Bellevue Road, and the second being lots accessed off of Route 221 (not including the Trivium house). 7. A right turn lane and taper will be constructed on Route 221 at the proposed entrance. 8. Along the southern and eastern boundaries of the rezoned lots, a 50-foot buffer will remain undisturbed. If disturbance is required, then a double row of evergreen trees, 12-foot on center, 6 feet fall at planting, shall be installed along or near the property line for the entire length of the disturbed area.

RZ050002 approved a total of 42 lots among two phases as stated in Proffer #6 above. The first phase named "Bellevue Terrace" has been platted and consists of 12 lots located along Bellevue Road (Route 643). The second phase, which has not commenced, is to be known as "Trivium Oaks" and is currently approved for 30 lots based on the rezoning plan.

Planning Commission Minutes 2 08/05/14 Due to a change in market conditions, the applicant is requesting to remove Proffers 1, 3 and 4 as listed above from the second phase. If approved, the zoning of the property would no longer stipulate the size of dwellings or type construction materials (Proffers 3 & 4). Proffers 2 and 8 would remain in effect which would continue to limit the use of the property to single-family dwellings and require a buffer along the eastern and southern property lines. Proffer 5 was unique to the first phase and has been completed. A revised proffer statement was provided by the applicant on June 24.

Staff notes what is considered the first phase, "Bellevue Terrace", was already platted and recorded prior to the 2005 rezoning. These lots were originally a part of the subject parcel (Tax Map 114-A-82) but were subdivided off in 2003. Furthermore, this phase originally consisted of 17 lots but was reconfigured in 2004 and 2008 into the current 12 lots.

A preliminary plan for the second phase, "Trivium Oaks", was also approved in 2003 for the remainder of Tax Map 114-A-82. A total of 36 lots were approved based on the AV and AR split-zoning at the time. Rezoning RZ050002 allowed a reconfiguration of the 36 lots into 30 lots as a result of the entire tract becoming zoned AV.

Mr. Robinson noted a letter dated 07/28/14 had been received from four citizens associated with Brookhill Farms. Mr. Robinson stated the Commissioners had received this package prior to the meeting. Additionally a letter dated 08/04/14 received from Don W. Baker of the Trivium Estate and Conference Center, LLC was provided to the Commissioners at the meeting. Mr. Robinson stated he had contacted the originators of these letters to discuss and clarify items of concern which were not accurately stated in their letters. Mr. Robinson noted the letter from Brookhill Farms stated the property is located in the Bellevue Rural Historic District and included on the Virginia Landmarks and National Register of Historic Places. Staff has confirmed the property is located in this historic district; however the county has not placed an historic overlay zoning district on this property.

Questions/comments from the Commissioners to Mr. Robinson covered the following: (a) is the conference center adjacent to the property considered a civic use, (b) Rural Historic District - the recognition of an historic district by the state and/or federal registers does not impose any regulatory affects on the property rather it opens the property up for the availability of possible state or federal funds for preservation activities, (c) which proffers are to remain - the staff report and the slide presentation differed slightly, (d) is proffer # 7 regarding the right turn lane a VDOT concern and not for the Planning Commission and (e) proffer # 4 - architectural standards - these normally come under homeowner associations and not zoning.

Mr. Robinson noted the conference center is considered a commercial use. Mr. Robinson noted the proffers to remain are # 2 and # 8. Proffer # 7 is a VDOT concern - this is why the applicant is requesting this proffer be removed. County Attorney Boggess noted architectural standards can come up under zoning. He also noted it would be a policy decision by the Board of Supervisors as to the role architectural standards would play in a rezoning request.

Planning Commission Minutes 3 08/05/14 Mr. Russ Orrison of Perkins & Orrison, agent and engineer spoke on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Orrison noted this project began 9 years ago and times were different. At that time proffers were offered to address concerns of neighbors. Mr. Rosko's vision was to have large homes similar to those in Bellevue Terrace. The number of lots was reduced from 17 to 12 and we voluntarily agreed to dedicate the public right-of-way for Bellevue Road at the time of the original rezoning request in 2005. If the property is to be sold the close proximity of public water could be a consideration for the purchaser.

Questions/comments from the Commissioners to Mr. Orrisson covered the following: (a) would you still recommend drilling wells prior to construction as you previously recommended during the public hearing with the Board of Supervisors on 12/13/14 if no connection to public water is available and (b) is there a right-of-way in the existing 12 lots into the 72 acre parcel?

Mr. Orrison stated the owner is essentially selling 72 acres of empty land and not constructing anything. He noted his statement was a suggestion as part of the discussion during the original rezoning request and not a formal proffer. Mr. Orrison stated he would agree to make the recommendation of drilling a well before someone begins construction as a part of the sales contract. Mr. Orrison stated there is no right-of-way in the existing 12 lots into the 72 acre parcel.

Mr. Craig asked if there were any citizens to speak regarding the application. Susan Arthur 7033 Bellevue Road asked how many lots or homes could be put on this parcel. Mr. Orrison stated the number of lots would be dependent on whether public water was available or the lots would be served by private wells. Mr. Orrison estimated if served by private wells approximately 40-50 one acre lots. If the lots were served by public water approximately 60 - 70 20,000 sf lots. Mr. John Briscoe 1390 Thaxton School Road noted the housing market has changed. This request is about doing what a landowner wants to do with their land. He noted the request is a good idea and recommending rolling back the proffers. There being no additional speakers Mr. Craig closed the public hearing and asked for discussion among the Commissioners.

Comments from the Commissioners covered the following: (a) historical district designation is honorary only, (b) request is due to the hardship of today's economy, (c) in favor of this request and (d) stand alone property and see nothing unreasonable with this request.

Mr. Scott made a motion to recommend to the Board of Supervisors approval of rezoning application RZ140006. Mr. Tillett seconded the motion.

Mr. Burdett noted the applicant is asking to do what anyone else in the AV zoning district can do with their land. The property had been split zoned since 1998 and the rezoning in 2005 eliminated that issue.

Voting yes: Mr. Brown, Mr. Burdett, Mr. Huff, Mr. Scott, Mr. Tillett and Mr. Craig

Voting no: Mr. Noell

Planning Commission Minutes 4 08/05/14 Motion passed 6-1

Mr. Craig moved to Item 5 - Old Business, hem 5 was a continued discussion of the Future Land Use Map. Mr. Jordan Mitchell noted the Commissioner had requested changes at their July 8, 2014 work session. Mr. Mitchell reviewed the changes requested and provided the revised maps reflecting such. Mr. Mitchell made notes of any additional changes requested by the Commission. Mr. Mitchell asked if the Commission chooses to see the maps again once the changes requested tonight are reflected or can staff make the changes and move forward. The Commissioners agreed staff should move forward once the changes requested have been made to the maps. Mr. Boggcss noted there is still some work to be done on the text for the Solid Waste chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. Secondly to alleviate so many public review projects under section 22.32 we need to have all the plans incorporated by reference in Chapter 1. This would include the Rt. 221 Corridor Study (currently the Board of Supervisors has not taken action on this plan). Mr. Boggess estimates bringing the final package back to the Commission in a month to six weeks. The consensus of the Commission was for staff to move forward and lo bring back to the Commission a final of the Comprehensive Plan text and Future Land Use Map.

Mr. Boggess reviewed with the Commission their upcoming cases. At the meeting on 08-19-14 there will be two Special Use Permits requests from the Bedford Regional Water Authority. One is for a more than 50% expansion at the High Point facility and the second is for the project on the old Camp 24 property on Radford Church Road. Mr. Boggess noted there arc no items to come before the Commission at the 09-02-14 meeting and suggested canceling that meeting. The Planning Commission agreed to cancel their meeting scheduled for Tuesday, September 2, 2014. In October staff will bring forward suggested changes to the Permitted Use Table. At the meeting on 09-16- 14 there will two public hearings. One public hearing will be a Special Use Permit for a substation by Southside Electric and the second will be a Special Use Permit for a potential wedding chapel.

Mr. Boggess noted during the month of August interviews will be conducted for the Director of Community Development position. There being no additional business, the meeting was adjourned by consensus at 8:09 pm.

Respectfully submitted,

Mark. rt. Rcetcr, Secretary

Approved by:

Jerry jCraig/C^hairman

Planning Commission Minnies 5 08'05/N 7c

Bedford Regional Water Authority – Board of Directors Regular Board Meeting – Minutes July 15, 2014

A regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors of the Bedford Regional Water Authority (“Bedford Water”) was held on Tuesday, July 15, 2014 in the Board Meeting Room in Bedford Water’s Annex building located at 1723 Falling Creek Road in Bedford County. Members Present: ...... Elmer Hodge, Chair Carl Wells, Vice Chair Cindy Gunnoe Michael Moldenhauer Thomas Segroves Members Absent: ...... Bob Flynn Walter Siehien Staff Present: ...... Brian Key – Executive Director Dennis Wood – Assistant Director Jill Underwood – Financial Manager Sam Darby – Legal Counsel, GFD&G 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by the Chair at approximately 7:00pm. The Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence were conducted. The Chair also asked the audience members to introduce themselves. 2. Review of Agenda The following agenda was reviewed as shown below.

1. Call to Order a. Pledge of Allegiance b. Moment of Silence 2. Review of Agenda 3. Public Comments 4. Approval of Minutes: June 17, 2014 – Regular Board Meeting 5. Financial Report: Presented by Jill Underwood a. Financial Statements through month end June 2014 6. Director’s Report: Presented by Brian Key a. Resolution 2014-07.01 – Prepayment for Moneta Elementary Sewer Line Extension b. Resolution 2014-07.02 – Facility Fee Waiver for Moneta Elementary School c. Resolution 2014-07.03 – Policy Revisions d. Routine Activity Reports i. Projects

ii. Customer Service Statistical Summary iii. Public Relations Information 7. Other business not covered on the above agenda 8. Motion to Adjourn

3. Public Comments Mr. George Aznavorian explained that he worked with the Authority for the Moneta Wastewater Treatment Plant using the PPEA process. Mr. Aznavorian stated that he would be able to take out a $100,000 loan for the Authority if he were able to receive prepayment credits from the Authority. His request, as stated in an email to the board included in Section 6.a, was to receive $100,000 in prepayment credits if he were to give $100,000 towards the Moneta Elementary Sewer Line Extension. 4. Approval of Minutes: June 17, 2014 The regular Board Meeting Minutes from June 17, 2014 were reviewed. Mr. Wells made a motion to approve the amended minutes. Mr. Segroves seconded the motion. • Board member votes: 5 Aye; 0 Nay. The motion passed. 5. Financial Report: Presented by Jill Underwood a. Financial Statements through month end June 2014 Ms. Underwood reviewed some of the details pertaining to the financial reports for the period ending June 2014. The targeted budget goal for June was 100%; operating revenues were 99%, and operating expenditures were 91%. Facility fees collected during June were $28,000; the Authority finished the year $278,900 over the budgeted facility fee revenue.

The Authority is still receiving invoices dated prior to June 30, 2014 and has adjusting entries that will be recorded as part of the audit. A final June 30, 2014 Statement of Revenues and Expenses will not be ready until September.

Ms. Underwood also summarized a report about the allocation of time the Authority spends on the different service areas versus the percentage of customers in the areas. It shows that the oldest system, Bedford Central, uses the majority of the staff time for the Authority but that the same service area does not hold the highest percentage of customers.

6. Director’s Report: Presented by Brian Key a. Resolution 2014-07.01 – Prepayment for Moneta Elementary Sewer Line Extension

A memorandum that summarizes the request was included in the packet, along with a map of the area surrounding the proposed Moneta Sewer line Extension. The

financial analysis shows that there are limited connections that are anticipated in the first few years after the construction of the sewer line is completed; with this in mind, it is estimated to take over 25 years to pay back the $100,000 contribution requested by George Aznavorian.

Mr. Aznavorian’s $100,000 contribution would not be a gift or grant but is a zero interest loan to the Authority. If the prepayments were granted as requested, the principal of the loan would be paid back to Mr. Aznavorian through the Authority giving him prepayment credits in equal value to the loan amount.

The board discussed further the costs of this project and how the Authority has not set aside capital funds for the project and agreed that the Authority would not be interested in contributing financially to the construction of the project.. They then reviewed the following resolution.

At a regular meeting of the Bedford Regional Water Authority (“Authority”) Board of Directors, held in the Board Meeting Room at the Authority’s Administrative Annex Building on the 15th Day of July, 2014, beginning at 7:00pm WHEREAS, the Moneta Elementary School has a failing septic system, and the Bedford County Public Schools has determined that a sewerline extension is desired to connect the Moneta Elementary School to the existing sewer system located on the south side of the railroad tracks on Route 903 South Old Moneta Road; and, WHEREAS, George Aznavorian has offered to finance $100,000 towards the construction of this sewerline extension, in exchange for being granted facility fee credits for the same amount in accordance with the Authority’s Prepayment Policy 4.40; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors does hereby authorize the Executive Director to execute an agreement with George Aznavorian for the Authority to receive one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) in exchange for prepayment credits in the same amount according to Policy 4.40; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the credits granted in the agreement may be redeemed for future water and/or sewer connections that are made anywhere in Bedford County.

Member Mr. Wells made a motion to deny this resolution.

Member Ms. Gunnoe seconded the motion to deny.

• Board Member Votes: 5 Aye, 0 Nay, 0 Abstain. The motion passed to deny granting the credits.

b. Resolution 2014-07.02 – Facility Fee Waiver for Moneta Elementary School

The Bedford County Public Schools have committed to the construction of a sewerline extension for the Moneta Elementary School to connect to the Authority’s existing sewer system in Moneta. Representatives from the school system have stated that they would like for the school to be exempted from having to pay the facility fees in exchange for their financial contribution towards the sewerline construction.

The Virginia Resources Authority would need to approve waiving of the fees before official approval can be given to the schools. The board also added that the waivers will be valid for 1 year for the sewer facility fee and 4 years for the water facility fee.

At a regular meeting of the Bedford Regional Water Authority (“Authority”) Board of Directors, held in the Board Meeting Room at the Authority’s Administrative Annex th Building on the 15 Day of July, 2014, beginning at 7:00pm WHEREAS, the Moneta Elementary School has a failing septic system, and the Bedford County Public Schools has determined that a sewerline extension is desired to connect the Moneta Elementary School to the existing sewer system located on the south side of the railroad tracks on Route 903 South Old Moneta Road; and, WHEREAS, the Bedford County Public Schools have committed to providing the majority of the funding for the design and construction of the project, with their contribution being in excess of $100,000; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors, contingent on receiving concurring approval from the Virginia Resource Authority (“VRA”), does hereby authorize the Executive Director to waive the water and sewer facility fee charges, in an aggregate amount of up to $60,000 total, to the Bedford County Public Schools related to connecting the Moneta Elementary School to the Authority’s systems; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the waivers, once approved by the VRA, will be valid for a period of 1 year for the sewer facility fee and 4 years for the water facility fee.

Member Ms. Gunnoe made a motion to approve this resolution.

Member Mr. Segroves seconded the motion.

• Board Member Votes: 5 Aye, 0 Nay, 0 Abstain. The motion passed. c. Resolution 2014-07.03 – Policy Revisions

A number of policies were included in the board packet for review and approval.

At a regular meeting of the Bedford Regional Water Authority (“Authority”) Board of Directors, held in the Board Meeting Room at the Authority’s Administrative Annex th Building on the 15 Day of July, 2014, beginning at 7:00pm WHEREAS, the Authority desires to have a comprehensive set policies governing the manner in which the Authority conducts its regular business, and the Board of Directors has directed that these policies be grouped together into an operating policy manual; and, WHEREAS, in order to keep the operating policy manual current and effective, the policies need to be periodically created, reviewed, revised, and updated; and, WHEREAS, the following policies have been created or modified, with the changes tracked to show the board the modifications that were made; now, • 2.21: Incidents and Liability • 4.05 Developer Project • 4.04 Developer Project Checklist – Not Authority Checklist Owned • 4.06 Fire Flow Meter Vault Checklist

• 4.08 Developer Checklist – • 22.00 Drought Response Individual Connection and Water Conservation • 6.13 Small Grinder Pump Plan Installation Checklist • 22.10 Water Emergency – • 10.10 Purchasing Regulatory Notification • 20.46 Workplace • 22.20 Sewer Emergency – Monitoring Regulatory Notification • 30.20 Easement Drawing Review Procedures THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Authority does hereby approve policies 2.21, 10.10 and 22.00 as modified; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Authority does hereby authorize the Executive Director to approve of modifications to the other policies as listed above.

Member Mr. Moldenhauer made a motion to approve this resolution.

Member Mr. Wells seconded the motion.

• Board Member Votes: 5 Aye, 0 Nay, 0 Abstain. The motion passed.

d. Routine Activity Reports i. Projects A summary sheet was provided to the board about recent projects. The Black & Veatch/CHA design-build team for the Smith Mountain Water Treatment Plant Project gave a presentation about the status of the project.

ii. Customer Service Statistical Summary Mr. Key explained that the statistical summary for customer service was in the board packet, and offered to address any questions that the board may have. There were no questions from the board. iii. Public Relations Information Various news articles were provided to the board in regards to the SMLWTP, the new rate structure, and the Moneta Elementary project. There were no questions asked by the board. 7. Other Business There was no other business discussed. 8. Motion to Adjourn: There being no further business to discuss, Mr. Moldenhauer made a motion to adjourn and Mr. Wells seconded the motion. • Board member votes: 5 Aye; 0 Nay; 0 Abstain. The motion passed.

The meeting adjourned at approximately 8:37 pm.

Prepared By Megan Rapp – Communications Coordinator Approved: August 19, 2014 7d

building report A Summary of the Division of Building Activities During the Month of July 2014

Valuation of Construction Fees Collected

July 2014 July 2014

$9,814,543 Total Receipts $32,500.75 Less State Surcharge 570.40 Net Receipts $31,930.35

July 2013

$13,549,006 July 2013

Total Receipts $41,987.41 Total Inspections: Less State Surcharge 742.67 Net Receipts $41,244.74

2,011 (July 2014)

1,716 (July 2013)

Waived Fees:

Permits Issued: Bedford Co. Dept. of Recreation - $25.00

(YTD FY 2015) = 130

(YTD FY 2014) = 153

Plans Reviewed:

62 (July 2014)

41 (July 2013)

Permits Issued by Election District

Election District 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Total

New Dwellings 7/14 7/13 SFD 1 5 6 3 4 0 2 21 26 MFD 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 5

ALT/ADD 2 8 5 4 10 3 0 32 24

M/H 0 3 1 0 2 1 3 10 13

ACCESSORY BLDG 3 2 1 1 1 3 3 14 17

DOCKS 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 7

POOLS 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 6 4

R/C 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 5 4

MISC. STRUCTURES 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 4

OTHER 1 7 4 3 7 6 7 35 49 10 30 18 14 27 15 16 130 153

**MISC. STRUCTURES - Agricultural Buildings Greenhouse Pavilion Tent Tower

**OTHER - Miscellaneous (Electrical, Plumbing, Mechanical, Demolition, etc.)

7e Tri-County Lake Administrative Commission Environmental Committee Meeting May 27, 2014

1. Call to Order: Bob Camicia called the meeting to order at 1:03 p.m.

Members Present: Bob Camicia Jim Harvey Larry Iceman Doug Pafford Ken Ralph Brent Reus

Members Absent: Van Flora

Staff Present: Pam Collins

2. Approval of Agenda: Larry Iceman requested adding Item 4d, Zebra Mussel – Education Initiative to the agenda. It was the consensus of the Committee to approve the agenda as amended.

3. Approval of Minutes: Larry Iceman made a motion to approve the March 24, 2014 minutes. Jim Harvey seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.

4. Action Items: a. Consideration of Recommendation from Aquatic Vegetation Subcommittee for Awarding Aquatic Vegetation Treatment Contract: Bob Camicia reported that the Aquatic Vegetation Subcommittee met to review the bids received in response to the recently released Aquatic Vegetation Treatment Request for Proposal. SOLitude Lake Management, Professional Lake Management and Skip’s Aquatic Solutions, three contractors that TLAC has previously worked with, sent in bids. The Subcommittee chose SOLitude Lake Management as they had the lowest treatment price and we have been pleased with their work in the past including providing information for our Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan. Doug Pafford made a motion to approve the Subcommittee’s recommendation to award the vegetation treatment contract to SOLitude Lake Management and to present that recommendation to the TLAC Board at their June meeting. Brent Reus seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.

b. Consideration of Proposed Treatment Guideline Plan: Committee members reviewed and discussed the draft document, prepared by Brent Reus and Doug Pafford, outlining vegetation treatment guidelines for Smith Mountain Lake for this summer. Although the goal is to rely on the sterile grass carp to continue to control vegetation growth, guidelines need to be in place. Treatment recommendations included: • Treating only Hydrilla, and only if an infestation is so dense that it would impede navigation or recreation • Treating newly infected areas, particularly in the Roanoke River arm of the lake

Brent noted that Sarah Cahill, a SMLA weed monitor, reported recently that there is no Curlyleaf pondweed growing in Little Bull Run, indicating that the carp are doing their job. Members also discussed that should adding additional carp become necessary VDGIF will now allow TLAC to apply for the permit plus APCo will submit a letter to VDGIF stating that they (APCo) and TLAC are working cooperatively to control Hydrilla at SML. Ken Ralph made a motion to adopt the guidelines as presented. Jim Harvey seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.

c. Discussion of Virginia Water Permit for Smith Mountain Lake: Members discussed whether this committee should participate with Russ Johnson and the SMLA Water Management Committee to be involved with the water release permit for SML. Bob Camicia noted that several residents believe there are problems with the current protocol. After much discussion, the committee agreed to wait for additional information, keep apprised of the status but not collaborate with anyone until proposals are reviewed. The SMLA Committee will be invited to share a presentation on the topic and updated with this Committee.

d. Zebra Mussels: Larry Iceman reported that two SMLA Lake Committee members have done extensive research regarding zebra mussels. They would like to discuss organizing a campaign to make the public aware of the potential danger of finding zebra mussels in SML. Although there have not been any reports of this invasive species in our area, there is concern that that could change if the public is not made aware. Larry noted that the men would like to meet with Pam sometime in the future to discuss TLAC’s involvement in their endeavor. Pam noted that TLAC has numerous informational items warning residents about many aquatic invasive species, including zebra mussels, since 2004.

5. Updates: a. Restocking Sterile Grass Carp Review: Jim Harvey shared the following information from his review on restocking sterile grass carp: • Recommendations vary state by state from as often as every 18 months to as seldom as every 10 years • Many states do not specify a time, but note restock as needed • 10” – 12” fish are an adequate size to stock

b. Lake Management and Project Coordinator Report - Aquatic Vegetation Meeting with VDGIF & APCo: Pam Collins reported that TLAC, VDGIF and APCo will meet again in August and November to continue discussions regarding invasive aquatic vegetation treatment and restocking grass carp. They will be looking at data and trends to be used to make decisions for the upcoming year. She noted that VDGIF will approve additional carp this year in the summer if there is a problem.

6. Adjourn: The meeting adjourned at 2:35 p.m.

Respectfully submitted, Karen Henson 7f Tri-County Lakes Administrative Commission Monthly Board Meeting Minutes July 8, 2014

Members Present: Bob Camicia Stan Goldsmith Jerry Hagerman Rick Huff Larry Iceman John Lindsey Clarence Monday Kristina Mize Mark Reeter Sherwood Zimmerman (via conference phone)

Members Absent: David Laurrell Ron Miller Frank Simms Bill Thomasson

Staff Present: Pam Collins Karen Henson

Others Present: Bill Marshall, LVLA; Patricia Dade, APCo; Megan Carpenter, Laker Weekly

Chairman Jerry Hagerman called the meeting to order at 4:06 p.m.

Prior to continuing the meeting, it was necessary for members to approve the use of a conference phone during the meeting. Larry Iceman made a motion to approve Sherwood Zimmerman’s participation in this meeting via conference phone. John Lindsey seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.

1. Election of Officers: Bob Camicia made a motion for the current officers to continue their roles until terms end in January 2015. Rick Huff seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.

2. Approval of Agenda: Bob Camicia made a motion to approve the agenda as presented. Stan Goldsmith seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.

3. Approval of Minutes: Mark Reeter made a motion to approve the June 10, 2014 minutes as presented. Bob Camicia seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.

4. Approval of Financial Report: Larry Iceman made a motion to approve the June 2014 Financial Report. Kristina Mize seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.

5. Action Items: a. Request Approval of TLAC Line Item Budget for Smith Mountain Lake for FY14/15: Pam Collins reviewed the proposed budget for TLAC-SML noting that County contributions are based on shoreline percentage. Bob Camicia made a motion to approve the TLAC–SML Line Item budget as presented. Larry Iceman seconded the motion. The motion carried with Stan Goldsmith and John Lindsey abstaining.

b. Request Approval of TLAC Line Item Budget for Leesville Lake for FY14/15: Pam Collins reviewed the proposed budget for TLAC-LVL noting contributions are from Bedford, Campbell and Pittsylvania Counties. Sherwood Zimmerman expressed his concerns that no one from Leesville Lake was consulted during the preparation of this budget or the new hire application. Sherwood Zimmerman made a motion to table this discussion until County Administrators can meet to discuss and resolve his concerns. Stan Goldsmith seconded the motion. Larry Iceman questioned whether this would affect the SML budget as the Executive Director’s salary is included as a line item in each budget. Sherwood Zimmerman amended his motion to exclude the specific line items for the Executive Director’s salary items. Stan Goldsmith seconded the motion. The motion carried as amended with Bob Camicia, Rick Huff and Kristina Mize abstaining.

c. Request Approval of TLAC Work Plan for Smith Mountain Lake for FY14/15: Pam Collins reported that there were a few additional tasks added to this new Work Plan, including staff and Committee members becoming more knowledgeable of the current APCo License and responsibilities. Bob Camicia made a motion to accept the TLAC Work Plan for SML as presented. Kristina Mize seconded the motion. The motion carried with Stan Goldsmith and John Lindsey abstaining.

d. Request Approval of TLAC Work Plan for Leesville Lake for FY14/15: Stan Goldsmith made a motion to table this until further review. Clarence Monday seconded the motion. The motion carried with Bob Camicia, Rick Huff and Kristina Mize abstaining.

e. Consideration of Approval to Renew Office Suite Lease: Pam Collins reported that our landlord has indicated that there will be no increase in the $1,579.50 per month rent paid for our office. Kristina Mize made a motion to approve the office suite lease for another year. Sherwood Zimmerman seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.

f. Consideration to Support H.R. 4976: Bob Camicia briefly explained H.R 4976 to Board members noting that the intent of this bill is to require FERC to consider individual property owner’s rights when discussing licensing issues. Rick Huff clarified that this Board cannot take a political stance on a bill, but can make recommendations to the Counties. Larry Iceman made a motion that TLAC recommend to the four County Boards of Supervisors that they support this bill. Sherwood Zimmerman seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mark Reeter advised staff to make the requests very clear and to include Rick Huff’s information in the requests. The Leesville Lake Association and the Smith Mountain Lake Association also requested copies of this recommendation of support.

6. Updates: a. Tri-County Relicensing Committee: Bob Camicia reported that he will soon meet with legal counsel to discuss the requirements for dissolving the committee.

b. Executive Director: To date, on behalf of residents, we have forwarded 12 navigation aid related reports, 26 SML debris reports and 2 LVL debris reports to APCo in 2014.

7. Reports from the Board and Committees: a. Environmental Committee: Bob Camicia reported that the number of reports of aquatic vegetation received this season will determine how many additional sterile grass carp will be introduced next season.

b. Navigation Committee: No report was given.

c. APCo Report: In Frank Simms absence, Patricia Dade reported the following: • The skimmer will move to Leesville Lake sometime this week and should be there until November • Oak Grove Ramp construction has begun • New channel marker signs have been installed • Adjusted lake level: 795.05 Sherwood Zimmerman asked/recommended that APCo purchase a second skimmer that can remain on Leesville Lake and that they hire a contractor to remove the debris that the skimmer cannot get.

d. Leesville Lake Association: Sherwood Zimmerman reported that the water level at Leesville Lake was dangerously low throughout the entire July 4th weekend. He requested that APCo consider holding additional water at Leesville Lake for holiday weekends.

e. SMLA Report: Larry Iceman stated that reports from Ferrum College indicate that water clarity has improved (best reading in ten years) with secchi level depths registering at 4 ½ meters in Gills Creek. Phosphorus and algae levels have dropped and there was only one report of e coli, which was the result of a sunken boat at Smith Mountain Dock.

8. Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at 5:37 p.m.

Respectfully submitted, Karen Henson

7g BEDFORD COMMUNICATION Number Of Calls Report by Day of Week - Hour of Day

First Date: 07/01/2014

Jurisdiction: BEDFORD Last Date: 07/31/2014 08/05/2014 10:32:5

Day / Hour

1-Sun 2-Mon 3-Tue 4-Wed 5-Thu 6-Fri 7-Sat Total 0 28 13 26 28 20 47 42 204 1 16 13 8 14 14 17 20 102 2 18 10 15 29 25 13 27 137 3 14 2 10 14 8 8 13 69 4 6 13 9 8 8 4 12 60 5 6 9 10 8 12 7 8 60 6 5 12 9 17 16 5 13 77 7 22 25 32 27 29 25 9 169 8 18 38 41 47 43 36 25 248 9 27 52 82 62 52 47 27 349 10 27 64 108 100 92 58 36 485 11 21 60 94 90 72 65 32 434 12 27 64 80 75 83 60 35 424 13 38 63 77 80 93 55 34 440 14 28 75 90 94 79 59 38 463 15 29 47 72 99 72 66 37 422 16 32 47 63 69 61 45 48 365 17 25 55 56 56 59 40 44 335 18 33 42 49 46 52 46 31 299 19 26 42 62 48 51 40 36 305 20 37 46 45 43 86 46 46 349 21 24 42 56 64 76 56 57 375 22 29 21 30 34 34 53 44 245 23 20 19 18 31 26 48 33 195 Total 556 874 1,142 1,183 1,163 946 747 6611

Calls By Day Of Week Calls By Hour Of Day

485 1200 1183 1163 500 463 1142 434 440 450 424 422 1100 400 365 375 349 349 1000 350 335 946 299305 300 900 874 248 245 250 204 195 800 747 200 169 150 137 700 102 100 69 77 60 60 600 556 50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 500 1-Sun 2-Mon 3-Tue 4-Wed 5-Thu 6-Fri 7-Sat

Bedford E-911 Communications July 2014 Total Calls For Service 4000 3507 3500

3000

2500

2000

1500 1089 1000 700 647 500 374 303 233 179 0 EMS FIRE SHERIFF UTILITIES TOWN PD OTHER LAW COUNTY OTHER ANIMAL CONTROL

Bedford E-911 Communications July 2014 Total Telephone Calls 18000 16364 16000 13821 14000

12000

10000

8000

6000

4000 1933 2000 610 0 WIRELESS 911 WIRELINE 911 ADMIN TOTAL

Bedford E-911 Communications July 2014

600 Total EMS Calls Dispatched

499 500

400

300 234

200 117 88 100 78 77 67 81 50 59 35 23 36 0

Bedford E-911 Communications July 2014 Total Fire Calls Dispatched

80 68 70

50 46 41 40 29 30 20 20 20 12 13 10 8 10 10 7

8 8a 9 10 10a CCOOUUNNTTYY OOFF BBEEDDFFOORRD, VIRGINIA COUNTY OF BEDFORDD,, VVIIRRGGIINNIIAA COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MARK K. REETER

COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 122 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 202 FRANK J. ROGERS BEDFORD, VIRGINIA 24523 DEPUTY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ______

O FFICE OF C OUNTY A DMINISTRATOR

M E M O R A N D U M

To: Bedford County Board of Supervisors

From: Mark K. Reeter County Administrator

Date: September 8, 2014

Subject: Request for Board Guidance Concerning Proposed Tourism Strategic Plan

The process to recruit and select and new County Director of Tourism is underway, with the position having been posted (advertised) as of August 17 and applications being received (interviews have not yet been scheduled). I am seeking guidance from the Board as to the matter of the development of a strategic plan for the future development of the tourism industry in Bedford County; specifically whether the Board wishes to proceed in the current fiscal year to procure and select a consultant to begin this work, or whether this matter should be a budget item from the Department of Tourism for Fiscal Year (FY) 2015-16, to be considered by the Board as part of next year's budget process? Funds for development of such a plan were not part of the Tourism Department's FY2014-15 budget request. Direction from the Board in this regard will be helpful in outlining the initial job expectations and requirements to prospective candidates for the Director's position during the pending interview process.

I roughly estimate the cost of a tourism strategic plan to range between $20K and $50K depending on its scope and data collection requirements. If initiated in the current fiscal year, work could begin (and costs incurred) potentially as early as December this year or as late as April of next year (depending on the starting date of the new Director and how quickly a consultant could be procured, selected and under contract). With some part-year 'vacancy savings' now being realized in the Director's position, it may not be necessary to provide supplemental funding to the Tourism Department's current budget to begin work on the strategic plan within the current fiscal year; however this cannot be assured. It is almost certain that Tourism's budget would not have sufficient funds available in the current fiscal year to cover the entire cost of a plan development contract; additional funding would most likely be needed in FY2015-16. It may be possible to structure a contract so as to obligate only what is available in the current fiscal year, then obligate the balance of the contract after July 1 of next year assuming additional funding is appropriated by the Board.

______

540-586-7601-TELEPHONE 540-586-0406-TELEFACSIMILIE [email protected] www.bedfordcountyva.gov 10b Governor Major Workforce McAuliffe Development attends VACo’s Initiative County Officials announced... County Summit... Page 2 Page 4 Connections James City Visit Botetourt The Newsletter of the BOS appoints County and Virginia Association of Counties new County the Historical Administrator... Museum... Page 3 Page 5 August 19, 2014 State revenue shortfall increases to $2.4 billion, $882 million in cuts are pending By Dean Lynch and Erik Johnston [email protected] and [email protected]

On August 15, Governor Terry McAuliffe announced that the interim forecast for the state budget estimates the state revenue shortfall to increase to $2.4 billion, which is $882 million more than expected in the enacted Biennium Budget. The Governor outlined the major budgetary challenges facing the Commonwealth and his vision for overcoming these challenges in a speech to the joint Money Committees of the General Assembly and later in an address and conversation with county, city and town officials at VACo’s County Officials Summit in Henrico County.

According to the Governor, the additional projected shortfall is largely attributable to sequestration, which reduced military contracts in Virginia by about 20 percent or $9 billion between 2011 and 2013 and is slated to continue. While the national economy continues to recover with employment growth at 1.7 percent the last fiscal year, Virginia employment finished last Governor Terry McAuliffe speaks to local government representatives about the state budget fiscal year at 0.4 percent. All major sources of at the VACo Country Officials Summit. revenue except for the insurance premiums tax and individual income tax refunds contributed to the deficit, however, collections of individual non-withholding accounted for most of the shortfall.

The General Assembly created a revenue reserve of $846 million in the current Appropriations Act and an additional $705 million can be withdrawn from the Revenue Stabilization Fund (Rainy Day Fund) during the Biennium, for a total of $1.55 billion. The additional shortfall of $882 million in this new re-forecast includes $346 million that must be found in fiscal year 2015 and $536 million that will be needed in fiscal year 2016.

The Governor stated that the immediate problem is the projected $346 million shortfall in fiscal year 2015, which is already underway. The General Provisions of the Appropriations Act call for the Governor to construct a detailed plan for dealing with the shortfall and allow him to withhold general fund allotments up to an aggregate of 15 percent (with some limitations). Within this limit, the Governor can call for across-the-board budget cuts, targeted budget reductions, or a combination of both.

The Governor pledged that he and his finance team would work in collaboration with the General Assembly’s money committees to determine the best course of action, but did not outline any specific areas that will be targeted for reductions. In his discussion with local officials, the Governor pledged to work in collaboration with localities to meet the budget challenge.

The Governor said the plan to address the budget shortfall in 2015 would be put together immediately and that the General Assembly can enact changes to fiscal year 2016 when it returns to its 2015 legislative session since that fiscal year will not begin until July 1. The Governor will release his recommendations for 2016 at the Money Committees joint meeting on December 17. Governor McAuliffe’s Address to the Joint Money Committees of the General Assembly 15 Aug 2014

Chairman Stosch, Chairman Colgan, Chairman Jones, Chairman Ware, Members of the General Assembly, ladies and gentlemen: Good morning. And to my wife, First Lady Dorothy McAuliffe, Attorney General Mark Herring and members of my cabinet, thank you for being here today. This is the time of the year when a Governor appears before you to report on the finances of the Commonwealth for the recently completed fiscal year and to discuss other issues of importance. There is much to talk about. I want to first thank members of the General Assembly from both sides of the aisle for working closely with my administration to find common ground on so many issues important to our constituents. We have worked hard over the past seven months to move Virginia forward, but there is much more work to be done. Just months ago in my first joint address to the General Assembly, I spoke about the essence of the Virginia way. Virginians have a way of coming together to work problems out – putting people and good public policy above politics. My administration has strived over the past months to work with the General Assembly to put this into practice, and we have had many successes. Together we worked to take politics out of the decision making process for our transportation priorities, created the Hampton Roads Transportation Accountability Commission, and eliminated the EZ pass maintenance fee. Together we reformed the Standards of Learning, and made significant progress towards transforming our workforce development system. Together we took a major step forward in fixing an inadequate mental health system and implementing reforms to cut costs in our Medicaid program. Together we improved the lives of veterans and their families by providing unemployment insurance and training opportunities to spouses, and worked with the business community on the importance of hiring our veterans. And most importantly, together we brought jobs to Virginia and kept our esteemed title as the Best State for Business. These past 7 months have been busy and full of successes. Together we have proven that Richmond is still a place where things get done, and where leaders come together around what is best for the people we serve. There is no question that we face major challenges, and that we have our policy disagreements, but I am confident that we can work together to protect our core priorities and lay a foundation for a new, stronger Virginia economy. I think everyone here is aware by now that Virginia suffered an unanticipated and significant revenue shortfall in the last fiscal year. No one in this room should be shocked by what I am going to say. This past fiscal year marks the first time that general fund revenues have declined in the Commonwealth other than in a national recession. While traditionally Virginia’s economy parallels or outpaces the national economy, we are now seeing that as the national economy begins to grow, our economy is suffering disproportionately due to federal government spending cuts. As you know, Virginia is the number one recipient of Department of Defense dollars. That is a boon to our economy when they are spending, but when they are cutting Virginia takes the brunt of the hit. In 2011 through 2013, sequestration reduced military contracts in Virginia by about 20 percent, or $9 billion. A 2013 analysis by Dr. Stephen Fuller of George Mason University projected a loss of 154,000 jobs in Virginia, about four percent of the Commonwealth’s labor force, due to sequestration. Most of these job losses have occurred in the private sector. The new jobs we are creating cannot compensate for the high-paying federal government-related jobs that we have lost over the past three years, especially in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads. During the last fiscal year, US payroll employment grew 1.7 percent as the national economy continued to recover. However, employment in Virginia, which had been growing at a slow rate of around one percent since early 2011, weakened even further, and we finished our last fiscal year with just 0.4 percent growth. As you would expect, that disturbing trend in employment growth has impacted Virginia’s revenue picture dramatically. As a direct result of the deep cuts in federal spending, Virginia’s general fund revenue collections have been abnormally sluggish, particularly considering that nationally we are well into the expansionary phase of this economic cycle. Federal spending is a substantial generator of state tax revenues. According to the recent study completed by JLARC, between 18 and 30 percent, or between 2.7 and 4.6 billion dollars of Virginia general fund revenue comes directly from federal spending. The loss of jobs and revenue in Virginia as a result of federal fiscal policy presents a profound challenge for our Commonwealth. Here are the detailed statistics: Total general fund revenues and transfers declined $437.8 million, or 0.9 percent in last fiscal year, falling short of the official forecast which was for 1.6 percent growth. All major sources of revenue except for the insurance premiums tax and individual income tax refunds contributed to the deficit; however, collections of individual non-withholding accounted for most of the shortfall. Collections in this source were $401.1 million below the estimate. Final payments fell by 23.5 percent compared with the expectations for a flat amount of revenue. These payments are historically tied to non-wage income sources – mainly the financial markets. Despite record breaking increases in the stock market, it appears that the uncertainty of the federal fiscal cliff in December 2012 and January 2013 shifted more realized capital gains from 2013 into 2012 – compared to the budget projections. Although most of the revenue shortfall is attributable to the drop in non-withholding, the slowing collections in payroll withholding and sales taxes illustrate our state economy’s disconnect with the US economy. The federal government cutbacks impact jobs, income, and business and household spending. The government shutdown and the debt- ceiling discussions in the Fall of 2013 worsened this fiscal drag. As stipulated by the Virginia Code, if the total of individual income, corporate income, and sales taxes collected for the fiscal year is 1.0 percent or more below the total amount in the official budget estimate for those taxes, the Governor shall prepare a re-estimate of general fund revenues for the current biennium and the next. Initial fiscal year 2014 revenue collections exceeded this threshold. The Code states that the Governor’s re-estimate of general fund revenues shall be based upon a “review by an advisory council of revenue estimates with respect to economic assumptions and the general economic climate of the Commonwealth.” As part of the revenue re-estimation process, the Joint Advisory Board of Economists (JABE) met on July 9th to discuss two economic scenarios: the IHS Economics’ May standard and alternative pessimistic outlooks. The nearly unanimous recommendation of the Board was that the economic forecast for the U.S. should be the May standard and Virginia should be somewhere between the standard and pessimistic outlooks. JABE’s recommendations have been incorporated into a low growth economic forecast labeled as the JABE pessimistic forecast. The Governor’s Advisory Council on Revenue Estimates (GACRE) met on August 1st to review the revenue forecast based on the JABE economic input. After much discussion, the members advised further caution for the next two years, especially due to the sluggish job reports for Virginia and the large uncertainty relating to capital gains income. The GACRE’s recommendation resulted in a further lowering of the 2015-2016 biennial revenue forecast toward a more pessimistic outlook. Because of slower than expected growth in the Commonwealth, variables in the economic models for employment and income have been lowered in the interim forecast. Originally, the official forecast for employment growth for fiscal year 2015 was placed at 1.5 percent, far above the last fiscal year’s actual growth of 0.4 percent. The new forecast announced today has employment growth for fiscal year 2015 conservatively at 0.7 percent. As for fiscal year 2016, the new forecast for employment growth is 1.4 percent, compared with the 1.7 percent in the original official forecast. Wages and salaries are projected to grow 3.2 percent and 3.6 percent in fiscal years 2015 and 2016 respectively, compared with 4.0 percent and 4.2 percent in the official forecast. The interim forecast reduces revenue from what was included in the Appropriation Act by $859.5 million in fiscal year 2015, as growth falls from 5.2 percent in the official forecast to now 2.7 percent. The interim forecast also conservatively projects total revenue growth of 2.7 percent in fiscal year 2016 compared with 4.1 percent in the official forecast. This is a reduction of $1.1 billion. When the changes in the interim revenue forecast are combined with the revenue shortfall carried over from fiscal year 2014 of $438 million, the total revenue shortfall for the three year period is nearly $2.4 billion. The total shortfall breaks down to about $1.3 billion in the first year and $1.1 billion in the second year. In anticipation of this pending shortfall, the General Assembly wisely created budgetary reserves totaling $846 million in the current Appropriation Act. And I thank them for that effort. When these reserves are combined with an additional $705 million that could be withdrawn from the Revenue Stabilization Fund during the two year period, the total amount available to address the shortfall is about $1.55 billion. Since the total shortfall in the new interim forecast is now projected to be $2.4 billion, there is a difference of $882 million between this new re-forecast and the other previously enacted reserves of $1.55 billion. Of this amount, $346 million will have to be found in fiscal year 2015 and $536 million will be needed in fiscal year 2016. This additional amount will have to be made up by re-prioritizing our goals, and taking supplemental budgetary actions. The General Provisions of the Appropriations Act defines how I am to proceed in order to address a projected revenue shortfall from an enacted budget. After an official reforecast of revenue and certification of the revenue shortfall to the General Assembly money committees, an action which I am taking today, I am to construct a detailed plan for how the Commonwealth will proceed to deal with the shortfall. In doing so, I can withhold general fund allotments up to an aggregate of 15 percent (with some limitations). Within this limit, I can call for across-the-board budget cuts, targeted budget reductions, or a combination of both. The immediate problem we face is the projected shortfall in fiscal year 2015 since the fiscal year is already underway. The General Assembly can enact changes to fiscal year 2016 when it returns to its 2015 legislative session since that fiscal year will not begin until July 1. Thus, the urgent problem is really the additional shortfall of $346 million for fiscal year 2015. My finance team and I will immediately begin to put together a plan to address this shortfall in a responsible way that protects our core priorities and economic assets. I can assure you that my finance team will work closely with members and staff of the money committees as we move forward with our analysis. I am optimistic that our effort will produce a plan of action coordinated between the Executive and Legislative branches that can be prepared as quickly as possible so that the citizens of Virginia will know what to expect from their state government in the current year’s budget. After we have completed and reported a plan for the first year, we will continue to work on the remainder of the plan to balance the second year of the biennium. These adjustments will be included in my amendments for your consideration to the 2015 General Assembly. These actions will be released and presented to you when we meet again on December 17 to discuss my budgetary recommendations for the next legislative session. Based on everything that has happened, it is obvious that the economy of the past – where we could simply take the economic benefits of the Department of Defense for granted – is over. We need to move past this reliance --and build a new entrepreneurial, innovative and dynamic economy. If Virginia is going to remain a leader in the global marketplace, we must renew our efforts to diversify our economy and refocus our attention to addressing the changes that are already taking place. In short, we need to work together to Build a New Virginia Economy. The challenges we face are real – but with every challenge comes opportunity. If we agree, starting today, to work together and lay a foundation for a New Virginia Economy, we can make the difficult budget decisions while protecting the assets that make us competitive like public education, transportation and health care. We can continue to use our natural strengths and targeted incentives to make Virginia the most attractive place in the world to locate and grow a business. Together we stand at an economic crossroads, and the decisions we make over the coming months and years will determine whether we build a stronger and more resilient economy, or continue to allow external forces to determine the future of our Commonwealth. We are off to a very good start. As of today, 65,559 more Virginians are working in the Commonwealth than were on the day I took the Oath of Office. This is the 5th largest total increase in the nation. Virginia’s 5.3% unemployment rate is tied for the 3rd lowest rate east of the Mississippi River. Also, since the beginning of my administration, we have closed 152 economic development deals in Virginia. These projects will generate about $4.1 billion in capital investment. We have closed game-changing economic development deals in every region of the Commonwealth that will help diversify our state and local economies by recruiting new jobs and investment for Virginia workers, with many more in the pipeline. We brought Tranlin Paper Company to Chesterfield, which will invest $2 billion and create 2,000 new jobs at a new advanced manufacturing facility -- the largest Chinese investment and job creation project in Virginia history. That deal will also generate at least $50 million per year for agricultural producers from the sale of byproducts that can be used to make paper. We closed a deal with the Corporate Executive Board to invest $150 million to consolidate its global headquarters in Arlington saving 1,200 existing jobs and creating 800 new jobs with an average salary of $120,000. The U.S. Foreign Affairs Security Training Center at Fort Pickett will create hundreds of jobs in Nottoway County and hundreds of millions of dollars in investments. And since I took office we have also brought projects to Augusta, Grayson, Isle of Wight and Carroll Counties, the cities of Danville, Martinsville and Hopewell and dozens of other localities across the Commonwealth. And today I am pleased to announce that the Mayville Engineering Company will invest $10 million to expand its Virginia operations at a new manufacturing facility in Smyth County, creating 160 new Virginia jobs in the process. My team and I are working constantly to open new markets for Virginia businesses and agriculture products, creating new jobs and expanding our Commonwealth’s economic strength across the globe. We got the Chinese ban on Virginia poultry lifted after 7 years, which will result in about $25 to $30 million for Perdue alone, and could have similar results for our other five major poultry producers as well. This is a huge boost in increased business for our Port. And I am proud to report that Virginia is on pace to set yet another record for agriculture exports this year, bringing us one step closer to making the Commonwealth the East Coast Capital for Agricultural Exports. I have embarked on trade missions to China and the United Kingdom, and economic development trips to Chicago and California. And I have hosted productive discussions with leaders from Canada, Egypt, Ethiopia, France, Korea, Kuwait, Japan, Qatar, Singapore, Vietnam and others about how we can expand Virginia’s economic partnerships with countries around the globe. I am proud of the work that we have done, and there is no question that my efforts have been strengthened by the work of so many in this room and those who came before us who helped make Virginia the global economic leader that it is today. We are in a position of strength – but we have a responsibility to take the next steps forward in the face of the damaging defense cuts and economic headwinds in order to build this New Virginia Economy. One of those important steps is shoring up our strong relationship with the United States military. And so my goal is simple and straight-forward – we must be the most military-friendly state in the union. Today, it’s no accident that Virginia is host to many commands and organizations that play an important role in the defense of our great nation. The nature of Virginia’s strategic mid-Atlantic location is enhanced by our continuing focus on improving our infrastructure, our unmatched intellectual and technological capital, and a state-wide public educational system without peer. Developing these advantages proved to be of great value to the Commonwealth in the past and sustaining them will be of even greater value and importance to us in the future. It should be clear to all of us that the pressures on the Defense Department to reduce its overall infrastructure will only continue to grow. Therefore, we must act decisively to ensure that we do all we can to protect Virginia’s bases and installations and withstand the increased scrutiny that is sure to come. But at the same time, we must also broaden the base of our economy to attract new jobs and growth that are not as tied to congressional decision-making. Right now, military spending is responsible for an enormous chunk of our Commonwealth’s economic activity. But we have already seen the damage sequestration has done to our economy so far. And the Secretary of Defense has indicated, if no changes are made by 2016, an additional $50 billion in defense cuts will have to be made. We all know of Northern Virginia’s economic reliance on the Department of Defense, and in Hampton Roads, military spending accounts for 42% of the area’s Gross Regional Product. If I have learned anything after more than 40 years in business, it’s that you don’t sit idly by when your largest customer cuts spending. You get out there and hustle to find new sources of revenue so that you can keep your business healthy. That is why we must work together to build and maintain the best public infrastructure system anywhere in the world, so that we can attract the next generation of jobs in cybersecurity, biosciences, data analytics, aerospace and other industries that are building the economy of tomorrow. Whether it’s the Pentagon, a Fortune 500 company or a small business, when decision makers start looking for a new location, they look at which state offers the best public schools, the strongest transportation networks, the highest quality health care, the safest communities, and the cleanest environment. These are all enormous strengths for Virginia that contribute to the quality of life that our families enjoy. But if we are going to out compete 49 other states and Build a New Virginia Economy, we cannot afford to be complacent. In transportation, we are moving forward with planned improvements to Interstates 64 and 66, the continued extension of the Silver Line to Dulles, and the soon-to-be-opened I-95 Express Lanes. We have helped bring new passenger rail service to Lynchburg and Roanoke, and I am hopeful that we can work together to bring higher speed rail to the 95 corridor and expand multi-modal transportation options in urban areas like Arlington, Richmond, and Tidewater. Shortly after I took office my team and I made a series of tough decisions about the Port of Virginia. I am happy to report that the situation at the Port is improving, but we still have much work to do to make it the healthy and profitable economic asset it can be. I remain committed to working with each of you to make Virginia a leader in the global energy economy. This Commonwealth has phenomenal energy assets and great opportunities to lead the way in offshore wind, natural gas and cleaner coal. With our low energy costs and abundant resources, I know we can work together to make Virginia the manufacturing hub of the East Coast, creating jobs and making our economy more independent in the process. And as important as improving our transportation and energy infrastructure are to strengthening our economy, we must also work together to enhance our human capital as well. As I have discussed with many of you here today, strengthening our workforce development system is one of our best opportunities to make Virginia more economically competitive. This week, at the Virginia Community College System Chancellor’s Retreat, I signed Executive Order 23 establishing a new goal of awarding 50,000 workforce training credentials by the end of my term and doubling the number of Virginia veterans who are hired through the Virginia Values Veterans Initiative. I am also setting a goal of getting 10,000 businesses to sign a Patriot Pledge in support of our active military personnel, our veterans, and their families! I hope that this order will be a first step to strengthening our workforce development system, and that we will work together in the coming session and beyond to further ensure that every Virginian has the skills and training to compete in the economy of the future. Another key element of strengthening our human capital is ensuring that every child has access to quality public education beginning before kindergarten. This week I signed two Executive Orders creating a children’s cabinet and the Commonwealth Council on Childhood Success. These two groups will develop a systemic approach to ensure that every Virginia child, from birth to adulthood, can maximize his or her potential in every corner of the Commonwealth. And increasing our economic competitiveness also includes finding a way forward on an issue on which consensus has eluded us so far – expanding health care access to hundreds of thousands of Virginians. We have had a long and difficult debate on closing the coverage gap. However, in light of the dire revenue situation that I have just described, the desperate needs that exist all over the Commonwealth, and the real jobs and health care advantages that our competitor states are realizing from taking this funding, I remain hopeful that we can set politics aside and reach an agreement on this critical issue. We have already paid this money in, and we should bring it home to cover people who need it. And I agree with those in this room who are concerned about insulating Virginia from the risk that the federal government will change the terms of the deal. That is why I am committed to tailoring a compromise that ends the program if the financial burden on Virginia becomes greater than what we were promised. Recently I visited the Remote Area Medical Clinic in Wise County, where thousands of Virginians waited in the rain overnight for their only shot at seeing a doctor or dentist all year. Many of them were turned away. If we channel the wisdom and expertise of the people in this room today, I know we can find a way to get our friends and neighbors the coverage they need, and bring the economic and fiscal benefits of doing so back to the Commonwealth. As you know, by September 1st, I will receive a plan from the Secretary of Health and Human Resources on ways we can to our people. I will then shortly announce the actions I will take to use the authority of my office to expand health care to Virginians. And of course I look forward to your thoughtful work during your planned September special session, and I hope to work in partnership with each of you to find ways to provide additional health care to needy Virginians. As all of you know, I am always ready to meet and find a productive way forward. My door is always open. And so, as I conclude, I hope that my message here today is clear. We face real short-term and long-term challenges as a Commonwealth. The budget shortfall we face will require a series of hard decisions that will test our ability to protect our core priorities and balance our budget. The strengths that have buoyed our economy in the past are shrinking, creating a new imperative to diversify our economy. I believe that this moment can be one for history, where those of us in this room decide to work together to Build a New Virginia economy and create the next generation of jobs for the families we serve. We can weather the impact of federal cuts and the changing national economy and emerge stronger and more independent. But that requires all of us to come together and build a path to that New Virginia Economy, starting today. If we will work together to that end, the decisions we make will not be Democratic decisions or Republican decisions. The jobs we create will not be Democratic jobs or Republican jobs. They will be Virginia jobs. If we work together to protect and strengthen our assets, there is not a state or country on the globe that can compete with Virginia. In good times and bad, the Governor is the state’s top salesman, and I relish that role! Give me the tools to attract businesses to the Commonwealth, and I will make sure that they come to each of your communities! Mr. Chairmen and members of the General Assembly, on behalf of all the citizens of Virginia, I want to thank you in advance for your cooperation and efforts to lead Virginia toward a more independent and prosperous future. And I know that we are all grateful to the hard working Virginia state employees, who will implement the decisions we make together and continue to make ours the best-run state in the nation. I stand ready, without hesitation, to work together with you as we address the challenges ahead. Thank you and God bless this great Commonwealth!

10c From: Erik Johnston [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 2:14 PM To: Erik Johnston Subject: Request for County Legislative Proposals: VACo 2015 Legislative Process

VACo Memorandum

TO: County Administrators and County Liaisons FROM: Dean Lynch, VACo Deputy Executive Director & Erik Johnston, VACo Director of Government Affairs SUBJECT: Request for County Legislative Proposals: VACo 2015 Legislative Process DATE: August 29, 2014

VACo’s Steering Committees met on August 14-15 to begin development of a first draft of the association’s 2015 Legislative Program. The next key component of the VACo Legislative Process is to hear directly from member counties regarding their policy priorities for the 2015 session of the General Assembly. In order to assist VACo’s steering committees in receiving this critical input, please send VACo’s Erik Johnston ([email protected]) your county’s legislative program or issues the county has identified for the 2015 General Assembly session as soon as the information becomes available and no later than November 1.

We do understand that your county’s legislative program may not be finalized by that date, but if possible please send the issues you have identified at that time so that we can forward the issues to the appropriate VACo Steering Committees for consideration at VACo’s Annual Conference on November 9-11 at the Omni Homestead in Bath County, Virginia. VACo’s Resolutions Committee will review a first draft of the VACo’s 2015 Legislative Program this fall and then VACo staff will send this draft to the membership in advance of November’s Annual Conference. All of VACo’s Steering Committee’s will meet on Sunday, November 9 to finalize their portion of the legislative program. At that time, the steering committees will also review any legislative proposals forwarded by counties for consideration as additional issues to add to the document. The Resolutions Committee will then review and adopt the legislative program before the full membership considers and then adopts the final legislative program at the Annual Business meeting on November 11.

VACo’s staff and steering committees appreciate your help in this important process. If you have any questions, my contact details are available below.

Erik Johnston Director of Government Affairs Virginia Association of Counties 1207 E. Main Street, Suite 300 Richmond, VA 23219 Office: 804.343.2506 Mobile: 540.207.6235 [email protected]

Resolution # R102813-08 Page 1 of 3

At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Bedford, Virginia held at the Bedford County Administration Building on the 28th day of October, 2013, beginning at 7:30 p.m.

SUPERVISORS: VOTE: H. Steven Arrington, Chairman - District 5 Aye John R. Sharp, Vice-Chairman - District 4 Aye William 'Bill' Thomasson - District 1 Aye Curry W. Martin - District 2 Aye Roger W. Cheek- District 3 Aye Annie S. Pollard - District 6 Nay Tammy F. Parker - District 7 Aye

On motion of Vice-Chairman Sharp, which carried by a vote of 6-1, the following was adopted:

A RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE BEDFORD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES FOR THE 2014 SESSION OF THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY

WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Bedford County, Virginia has identified a number of legislative issues of import to the Board and the citizens of Bedford County that it wishes to bring to the attention of the Governor of the Commonwealth, the Virginia General Assembly and others prior to the start of the 2014 Session of the Virginia General Assembly; and

WHEREAS, it is the intent of this Resolution to set forth and convey the Board's position on such matters and to call upon its recipients to consider same during the 2014 Session;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Bedford County Board of Supervisors that the Board sets forth the following Legislative Priorities (General Priorities and Specific Legislative Requests) for the 2014 Session of the Virginia General Assembly:

General Priorities

Intergovernmental Revenue and State Mandates The Bedford County Board of Supervisors is keenly aware of the fiscal realities facing the Commonwealth over recent years due to the national economic slowdown. However, the Board wishes to remind the legislature that these conditions have also dramatically reduced the ability of the Commonwealth's local governments to absorb reductions in state funding across the board and continuing state mandates. The Board calls upon the General Assembly to stem the flow of drastic reductions in state aid to localities coupled with increasing state mandates that has been the hallmark of recent legislative sessions.

Machinery and Tools Taxation In a period of diminishing revenues and increasing mandates and rising demand for services, the local machinery and tools tax represents a significant and reliable source of revenue for Bedford County and for all localities which are home to major manufacturers. Because several manufacturers have chosen Bedford County as a location for their facilities, eliminating or reducing the source would be crippling to Bedford County's revenue structure. Machinery and tools taxation generates more than $2 million in Resolution # R102813-08 Page 2 of 3 ______

reliable revenue, which would have to be raised elsewhere or result in reduced services. The Board calls upon the General Assembly to preserve and protect this source of vital local revenue.

Transportation The 2013 General Assembly Session made great progress in enhancing funding for transportation, but many transportation issues remain unaddressed and uncertain. State funding for the Secondary Six-Year Plan Program, vital to rural localities in particular, remains inadequate. The Board respectfully asks that the legislature scrutinize the distribution of resources to ensure as much funding as is absolutely possible is directed to secondary and unpaved road maintenance and construction. While recognizing that significant progress was made in the 2013 Session, the Board strongly encourages continued assessment and development of new and innovative funding strategies for transportation. The Board asks that the members of the Commonwealth Transportation Board, legislators and representatives from jurisdictions throughout Virginia continue to work toward thoughtful, measured and responsible approaches to providing adequate transportation funding that will meet the needs of both rural and urban localities now and into the future. In particular, the Board continues to be seriously opposed to the concept of "devolution", the gradual transfer of responsibility for secondary roads from the Commonwealth to its localities. Predominately rural Virginia localities are simply not financially or structurally able to fully assume all responsibility for their extensive secondary road systems, even if assisted financially by the state.

Rural Broadband Broadband Internet connectivity has become as important to business success as any other utility. It is especially important to many home-based businesses and for telecommuters. Unfortunately, reliable high- speed broadband service is rarely available outside very urbanized areas, leaving suburbanizing and rural areas at a distinct disadvantage in the information marketplace. The Board has placed a high priority on this issue and has formed a Broadband Authority to independently research methods and means to foster the development of universal broadband coverage in Bedford County. These local efforts, while potentially productive, must compete for limited County resources resulting in slow implementation. The Board requests that the Commonwealth fast-track its efforts to develop ways to efficiently and economically provide "last mile" broadband coverage to suburban and rural areas of Virginia and support efforts to offer incentives for expansion of this service.

Specific Legislative Requests

Water Quality Certification Prior to Building Permit Issuance The Board calls for amending Section 32.1-176.5 (B) to include the local governing body of Bedford County, thus enabling the County to enact local ordinances to establish reasonable testing requirements to determine compliance with existing federal or state drinking water quality standards and require that such testing be done prior to the issuance of building permits. Currently there are 16 counties and 4 cities authorized by the General Assembly to require that a certification of groundwater quality be obtained before a building permit is issued.

Training/Certification Requirements for EMS Volunteers The Board specifically endorses the statement within the Virginia Association of Counties (VACo) 2014 Legislative Program "supporting practical and reasonable initial certification and ongoing continuing medical education (CME) requirements for County emergency medical service (EMS) and rescue squad volunteers". The Board feels that a major deterrent to volunteer service presently exists within the current, onerous training and certification/re-certification requirements imposed on EMS personnel by the state. The Board strongly supports a comprehensive re-evaluation of such requirements in an effort to both provide adequately-trained response personnel while at the same time reducing the hardship the current training/certification program imposes on career and especially volunteer personnel rural localities must rely upon for EMS response.

Resolution # R102813-08 Page 3 of 3 ______

Dam Safety Regulations The Board specifically endorses the statement within the Virginia Association of Counties (VACo) 2014 Legislative Program calling "for a review of Dam Safety Standards administered by the Department of Conservation and Recreation to evaluate ways of reducing their financial impacts upon local government and property owners while also protecting public safety".

Funding for District Court Clerk's Offices The Board joins with Henrico County in support of additional funding to District Court Clerk's offices, specifically the addition of $5.85 million in additional salary support requested by the Virginia Supreme Court to improve the compensation of District Court Deputy Clerks.

Conceal-Carry by Local School Personnel The Board urges consideration by the General Assembly to allow, as an option of the local School Board, the carrying of concealed firearms on school property by specially-trained school personnel as a means of enhancing the safety and security of children and employees.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board further endorses and supports the legislative requests of the Tri-County Lake Administrative Commission (TLAC) as set forth by Memorandum dated October 24, 2013, attached herewith this Resolution.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board directs this Resolution be distributed to Bedford County's representatives within the House of Delegates and Senate of the Virginia General Assembly and the Virginia Association of Counties.

A Copy-Teste:

Mark K. Reeter County Administrator

10d Mark Reeter

From: Kolakowski, Charles [[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2014 11:05 AM To: Mark Reeter Subject: Joint Meeting/Get Together

Mark,

We have discussed having a informal joint meeting to discuss common issues but perhaps revolving around a particular subject. The issue of the Centra buyout of the Hospital could be a good issue. Centra has plans to expand services not only at the Hospital but throughout much of the County. A significant number of Bedford County residents work at Centra and many more utilize their services. The economic development opportunities afforded by health care are huge. And the employment possibilities for Bedford students upon graduation are plentiful.

E.W. Tibbs from Centra would be willing to address the group to discuss their plans and answer questions on any number of topics. He has said he is available on October 13 or 14 or the 20th. It could be a good chance for the boards to hear a positive development. It might be a good event to include economic development people, business people, etc. (MKR - Recommend October 20 date).

Let me know what your thoughts are.

Charlie Kolakowski

1 11

VACo’s 2014 Annual Conference November 9-11, 2014

Please join us.

We will convene Nov. 9-11 for VACo’s 80th Annual Conference. Local officials, legislators, exhibitors and guests are expected to attend. The agenda will be packed with educational sessions and opportunities to network and discuss county concerns. A preliminary schedule is printed in this packet and additional details will continually be provided in VACo’s newsletter County Connections and on the website at www.vaco.org. One of the most important items on the agenda is our legislative action plan for 2015. VACo’s steering committees will wrap up the details on Sunday, then the full membership will vote on the legislative program during Tuesday's business meeting. Another vital part of the conference is the exhibit hall that will feature companies and organizations offering prod ucts and services of particular interest to Virginia counties. Please support our business partners, sponsors and exhibitors. This is your m eeting – your presence and input are important. We encourage you to register today! How to Register To register, fill out the enclosed conference registration form and mail it with your check made payable to VACo (or credit card information) to the address provided or fax to 804.788.0083. On-line registration, including group registration, is available by going to the VACo website www.vaco.org and clicking on the conference logo. Click on the 2014 Annual Conference Registration link and sign in with your e-mail address. If you have not used the on-line system previously, use Guest1 as your initial password. The system will prompt you to create your own password. Deadline for registration is Nov. 1. Registrations made after Nov. 1 will be charged a $50 late fee. Payment must be made at the time of registration - VACo will not bill for registration fees. Refund policy Cancellations may be made by sending request in writing to [email protected] no later than Nov. 1. All conference cancellations are subject to a $50 processing fee which will be deducted from the refund amount. Refunds will not be issued for cancellations received after Nov. 1. Lodging Hotel reservations are to be made directly with The Omni Homestead. Use the official 2014 VACo Conference room reservation form to receive the special conference rate. The Modified American Plan includes breakfast and dinner. Alternative lodging is available at nearby bed and breakfast inns and motels. VACo has prepared a list for your convenience of Alternative Lodging Information. The list is general information only; VACo does not have agreements or special arrangements with any of the listed establishments.

Banquet Tickets All conference attendees who are staying at The Omni Homestead may attend the Sunday banquet at no additional cost. So that we may provide an accurate headcount for the dinner, please indicate on your registration whether you will be attending the banquet or not. Banquet tickets are available for purchase by those who are staying off-site for $75 per person. Tickets are available in advance on the registration form or at the VACo registration desk. Those persons who are on the Wait List for a room at the hotel and have purchased banquet tickets can receive a refund if a room becomes available. Notify VACo to request your refund.

Golf Tournament VACo is sponsoring a golf tournament in connection with the Annual Conference on Sat., Nov. 8, 11:00 a.m. The fee is $75 per person; rental golf clubs are available for $75. Golf handicap or average score is used by the golf pro to form teams. The tournament fee is refundable if cancellation is received by Nov. 1. Notify VACo in writing by contacting [email protected] to cancel. Substitute players will be accepted. No-shows will not receive a refund.

Guest/Spouse Activities The Omni Homestead has undergone major renovations and is now offering many new activities. Information is available on their website at www.thehomestead.com/activities or at the Concierge Desk.

New This Year -- Electronic Device Charging Station For your convenience, a charging station will be available at no cost in the exhibit hall at Booth 705. The charger works with all brands of electronics. 2014 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION ATTENDEE INFORMATION Please print or type. FIRST & LAST NAME PREFERRED NAME TAG NAME TITLE COMPANY OR ORGANIZATION MAILING ADDRESS (street or P.O. Box) CITY/STATE/ZIP E‐MAIL (for confirmation/receipt) 2nd E‐MAIL (Optional ) CONTACT PHONE Area Code ______‐ ______

GUEST INFORMATION There is no additional fee charged for a spouse/guest. MY SPOUSE or GUEST’S NAME NO GUEST (Check here if you are not bringing a guest to the conference.)

BANQUET INFORMATION The Banquet is Sunday, Nov. 9, at 6:30 p.m. Those who are staying at The Omni Homestead Resort may attend the banquet at no additional cost. Please mark your choice below. Attendees staying elsewhere may purchase banquet tickets @ $75 per person. YES, I PLAN TO ATTEND THE BANQUET NO, I am not going to the banquet YES, GUEST PLANS TO ATTEND BANQUET Guest is not going to the banquet Check here for VEGETARIAN

Per How PAYMENT INFORMATION Person Many TOTALS Member Conference fee (County Members / Associate Members) $225 Non‐member Conference fee $250 $50 Late fee after Nov. 1 [date received by VACo] ‐ MEMBER $275 $50 Late fee after Nov. 1 [date received by VACo] – NON‐MEMBER $300 Banquet Ticket (for those not staying at the Omni Homestead) $75 VACo’s Annual Golf Tournament, Sat. Nov. 8 [Golf handicap/Avg. Score is: ______] $75 Rental Golf Clubs for the tournament $75 VLGMA Networking Luncheon, Mon., Nov. 10 $40 GRAND TOTAL

CREDIT CARD PAYMENT OPTIONS

Check one: American Express VISA MasterCard Discover Card Number: Exp. Date ______/ ______Name as it appears on card: Authorized Signature: E‐mail for credit card receipt:

CHECK IS ENCLOSED

Fax registration form with payment information to: 804.788.0083 Make checks payable to VACo. Mail check with completed registration form(s) to: Virginia Association of Counties, 1207 E. Main St., Ste. 300, Richmond, VA 23219 Questions? Call VACo at 804.788.6652 Conference Schedule (preliminary)

Details are subject to change.

Saturday, November 8 Monday, November 10 (continued)

9:15 a.m...... Supervisor Certification 10 a.m...... History tour of the Homestead, register 11 a.m...... Golf Tournament at the Concierge Desk 3 p.m...... Budget Committee 10-11:15 a.m...... Concurrent sessions/topics to be 5 p.m...... VACORP Board of Directors announced 11:30 a.m.-12:45 p.m....Concurrent sessions/topics to Sunday, November 9 be announced 7:30 a.m...... Non-Denominational Worship Service 12:45-1:45 p.m.....Deli lunch 9 a.m.-1 p.m...... VACo Board of Directors meeting 12:45- 2 p.m...... VLGMA Luncheon 9 a.m.-2 p.m...... Exhibitor setup 10 a.m...... History tour of the Homestead, register 1 p.m...... Credentials Committee at the Concierge Desk 1:20-1:45 p.m...... Group Walk and Talk (everyone is 10 a.m.-5:30 p.m...Registration invited) 1-4:15 p.m...... Coffee break for committee members 1:45-3 p.m...... Concurrent sessions/topics to be announced 1-2:30 p.m...... Steering committee meetings 3 p.m...... Mini-raffle in exhibit hall 1:30-5:00 p.m...... Exhibits open with refreshments Soda break in exhibit hall 2:45-4:15 p.m...... Steering committee meetings 3:30-4:45 p.m...... Concurrent sessions/topics to be announced 4:30-5:00 p.m...... Supervisor Certification Reunion 5 p.m...... High Growth Coalition Meeting 4:15-5:15 p.m...... Regional caucuses to nominate Rural Caucus Meeting representatives to Board of Directors Nominations Committee Meeting ...... President’s Reception 4:30-5:30 p.m...... Regional Meetings 5:45-7 p.m. 5:30-6:30 p.m...... Opening Reception (everyone is 9 p.m.-midnight....DJ in the Sports Bar cordially invited to attend) (no registration required) 6:30-9 p.m...... Banquet

9 p.m.-midnight.....DJ in the Sports Bar (no registration required) Tuesday, November 11

Monday, November 10 7:45-8:15 a.m...... VACORP Business Meeting 7:15-8:15 a.m...... Resolutions Committee 9-11 a.m...... General Session 8 a.m.-2 p.m...... Registration 10:15 a.m...... Refreshment break 8:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m....Exhibits Open 11 a.m.-12 noon....Business meeting, raffle and 8:30-9:45 a.m...... Opening Session adjournment

9:45 a.m...... Coffee Break 12