DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment for an Interbasin Transfer from the Roanoke River Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment for an Interbasin Transfer from the Roanoke River Basin Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment for an Interbasin Transfer from the Roanoke River Basin Prepared for Kerr Lake Regional Water System January 2015 3120 Highwoods Boulevard Suite 214 – Magnolia Building Raleigh, NC 27604 B-2 This page has been intentionally left blank. B-3 Contents Section Page Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. vii Project Description ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Background ................................................................................................................ 1-2 1.2.1 Kerr Lake ................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Water Treatment Plant Expansion ............................................................................ 1-3 1.2.3 KLRWS Infrastructure ................................................................................................ 1-3 1.2.4 Kerr Lake Allocation .................................................................................................. 1-3 1.3 Projection Description ........................................................................................................... 1-4 1.3.1 Project Area and Study Area Descriptions ................................................................ 1-4 1.3.2 Project Description ................................................................................................... 1-5 1.3.3 Guiding Legislation .................................................................................................... 1-5 Purpose and Need ..................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Purpose and Need Statement ................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Historical Water Demands ..................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Water Demand Projections ................................................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Proposed Interbasin Transfer ................................................................................................ 2-6 Project Alternatives .................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Alternative 1 – No Action ....................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Alternative 2 – Increase IBT to Meet Needs of Customers .................................................... 3-2 3.3 Alternative 3 – Avoid Additional IBT by Finding Alternative Surface Water Sources ............ 3-3 3.4 Alternative 4 – Avoid Additional IBT by Finding Alternative Groundwater Sources ............. 3-7 3.5 Alternative 5 – Minimize IBT by Discharging to Roanoke River Basin ................................... 3-7 3.6 Alternative 6 – Use Coastal Water as a Source ...................................................................... 3-8 3.7 Summary of Alternatives ....................................................................................................... 3-9 Existing Environmental Characteristics of Project Area ............................................................... 4-1 4.1 Water Resources (Surface Water and Groundwater) ............................................................ 4-1 4.1.1 Surface Waters .......................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Groundwater ........................................................................................................... 4-14 4.1.3 Hydropower ............................................................................................................ 4-15 4.2 Topography .......................................................................................................................... 4-18 4.2.1 Topography ............................................................................................................. 4-18 4.2.2 Floodplains .............................................................................................................. 4-19 4.3 Soils ...................................................................................................................................... 4-20 4.4 Land Use and Land Cover ..................................................................................................... 4-23 4.5 Wetlands .............................................................................................................................. 4-25 4.6 Prime or Unique Agricultural Lands ..................................................................................... 4-27 4.7 Public Lands and Scenic, Recreational, and Natural Heritage Program Natural Areas ....... 4-27 4.7.1 Public Lands ............................................................................................................ 4-27 4.7.2 Natural Heritage Program Natural Areas................................................................ 4-30 4.8 Areas of Archaeological or Historic Value ............................................................................ 4-31 4.8.1 Areas of Archaeological Value ................................................................................ 4-31 4.8.2 Areas of Historic Value ............................................................................................ 4-31 B-4 4.9 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................. 4-32 4.10 Noise Level ........................................................................................................................... 4-33 4.11 Forest Resources .................................................................................................................. 4-33 4.12 Shellfish or Fish and Their Habitats ...................................................................................... 4-34 4.12.1 Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Aquatic Species .............................. 4-34 4.12.2 Aquatic Natural Areas ............................................................................................. 4-37 4.12.3 Common Aquatic Species and Habitats .................................................................. 4-38 4.13 Wildlife and Natural Vegetation ........................................................................................... 4-39 4.13.1 Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species............................................ 4-39 4.13.2 Natural Vegetation & Common Wildlife ................................................................. 4-42 Environmental Consequences/Predicted Environmental Effects of the Project ........................... 5-1 5.1 Water Resources (Surface Water and Groundwater) ............................................................ 5-2 5.1.1 Water Resources: Surface Water .............................................................................. 5-2 5.1.2 Water Resources: Groundwater.............................................................................. 5-19 5.1.3 Water Resources: Hydropower ............................................................................... 5-20 5.2 Topography and Floodplains ................................................................................................ 5-26 5.2.1 Topography and Floodplains: Source Basin – Roanoke River ................................. 5-26 5.2.2 Topography and Floodplains: Receiving Basins – Tar River and Neuse River ......... 5-26 5.2.3 Topography and Floodplains: Receiving Basin – Fishing Creek ............................... 5-27 5.3 Soils ....................................................................................................................................... 5-27 5.3.1 Soils: Source Basin – Roanoke River ........................................................................ 5-27 5.3.2 Soils: Receiving Basins – Tar River and Neuse River ................................................ 5-27 5.3.3 Soils: Receiving Basin – Fishing Creek ..................................................................... 5-28 5.4 Land Use ............................................................................................................................... 5-28 5.4.1 Land Use: Source Basin – Roanoke River ................................................................ 5-28 5.4.2 Land Use: Receiving Basins – Tar River and Neuse River ........................................ 5-28 5.4.3 Land Use: Receiving Basin – Fishing Creek .............................................................. 5-29 5.5 Wetlands .............................................................................................................................. 5-29 5.5.1 Wetlands: Source Basin – Roanoke River ................................................................ 5-29 5.5.2 Wetlands: Receiving Basins – Tar River and Neuse River ....................................... 5-30 5.5.3 Wetlands: Receiving Basin – Fishing Creek ............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BOARD of SUPERVISORS Agenda
    BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Agenda September 8, 2014 WORK SESSION AGENDA BEDFORD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BEDFORD COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION a. Scott Baker, Extension Agent, with a presentation of the Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy in Virginia’s Region 2000. b. Todd Daniel and Brian Casella, VDOT Residency Office, with an update on road projects and issues. 6:45 P.M. Dinner a Strategic Plan for the Agriculture and Forestry Economy in Virginia’s Region 2000 September 8, 2014 1 About THOMAS P. MILLER AND ASSOCIATES, LLC • Fo unded in 1989 • Based in Indianapolis, IN with offices in Lexington, KY and Youngstown, OH • Full-service economic and workforce development consulting firm with extensive research and strategic planning experience 2 Project Background • The Local Government Council received a grant from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS) to develop an economic development strategic plan for agriculture and forestry • Formed a Strategic Plan Coordinating Team including leadership from local economic development organizations and local Virginia Cooperative Extension (VCE) offices • Representing Bedford: • Traci Blido – Director of Economic Development • Scott Baker – Agricultural Extension Agent 3 Approach SWOT Quantitative Final Asset Map Local Input One-on-One Analysis/ Data Strategic Inventory sessions Interviews Planning Analysis Plan Session •Over 95 individuals participate in interviews, input sessions, and/or planning sessions 4 Economic Impact of Agriculture and Forestry in the Region Source: Economic Impacts of the Agriculture and Forest Industries in Virginia June 2013: http://www.coopercenter.org/sites/default/files/publications/Virginia%20A gricultureForest%202012reva.pdf 5 Vision Statement We recognize and promote the agriculture and forestry industries to strengthen regional economic development and future sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Assessment of Sites 44PY7, 44PY43, 44PY152 At
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF SITES 44PY7, 44PY43, AND 44PY152 AT LEESVILLE LAKE PITTSYLVANIA COUN1Y, VIRGINIA ~ OTHER PALEOINDIAN CLUSTERS LEESVILLE LAKE SITES Prepared for Virginia Department of Historic Resources December 1994 ~ The College Of . .• :<( WILLIAM&MARY ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF SITES 44PY7, 44PY43, AND 44PY152 AT LEESVILLE LAKE PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY, VIRGINIA Submitted to: Virginia Department of Historic Resources 221 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Submitted by: William and Mary Center for Archaeological Research Department of Anthropology The College of William and Mary Williamsburg, Virginia 23187 Project Directors Dennis B. Blanton .)onald W. Linebaugh Authors Dennis B. Blanton William Childress Jonathan Danz Leslie Mitchell Joseph Schuldenrein Jesse Zinn December 16, 1994 ABSTRACT Sites 44PY7, 44PY43, and 44PY152 on the southern shore of Leesville Lake in Pittsylvania County were subjected to archaeological evaluation. Sites 44PY7 and 44PY152 were confirmed to contain Early ArchaicIPaleoindian horizons buried beneath 1.5 to 1.8 m of alluvium. Geoarchaeological analyses and a series of radiocarbon dates make the 44PY152 deposits among the best-documented early Holocene contexts in the region. Portions of these components have been lost to erosion, but each retains significant research potential. Site 44PY43 is a remnant of a Late Woodland village. Trenching failed to locate a palisade line, but numerous post features and possible pits were identified. This site also retains potential for recovering significant information on Late Woodland settlement in this section of the Roanoke River valley. Project results are discussed in the context of prevailing settlementlsubsistencemodels fbr the region. REPORT CONTRIBUTORS Authors: Dennis B. Blanton William Childress Jonathan Danz Leslie Mitchell Joseph Schuldenrein Jesse Zinn Graphics and Report Production Editors: Donald W.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoning Ordinance November 30, 1998
    Zoning Ordinance November 30, 1998 Updated 7-10-2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS..............................………….....................................................1 SEC. 30-1 AUTHORITY AND CITATION .................................................................................... 1 SEC. 30-2 JURISDICTION ............................................................................................................. 1 SEC. 30-3 PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................... 1 SEC. 30-4 APPLICATION OF REGULATIONS ............................................................................ 2 SEC. 30-5 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR; POWERS AND DUTIES ............................................. 2 SEC. 30-6 ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICTS ............................................................................. 2 SEC. 30-7 INTERPRETATION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES .................................................... 3 SEC. 30-8 PLANNING COMMISSION; POWERS, DUTIES, AND COMPOSITION .................. 4 SEC. 30-9 ZONING PERMITS ....................................................................................................... 5 Sec. 30-9-1 Building Permits; Relation to Zoning ......................................................................... 5 SEC. 30-10 CERTIFICATES OF ZONING COMPLIANCE ............................................................ 6 Sec. 30-10-1 Temporary or Partial Certificates of Zoning Compliance .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Supervisors
    BOARD OF SUPERVISORS November 27, 2017 Agenda Pictured is the Bedford Area Welcome Center’s “Festival of Trees”; this year’s festival runs 11.21.2017 through 01.04.2018. Agenda Item #1 Call to Order & Welcome Agenda Item #2 Moment of Silence Agenda Item #3 Pledge of Allegiance Agenda Item #4 Approval of Agenda 4 AGENDA BEDFORD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BEDFORD COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING NOVEMBER 27, 2017 7:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING - BOARDROOM (1) Call to Order & Welcome (2) Moment of Silence (3) Pledge of Allegiance (4) Approval of Agenda (5) Citizen Comments (15 Minutes) (6) Consent Agenda a. Consideration of a request from the Sheriff’s Office for a Supplemental Appropriation of the DMV Selective Enforcement – Alcohol Grant. (Resolution #R112717-01) b. Consideration of a request from the Sheriff’s Office for a Supplemental Appropriation of the DMV Selective Enforcement – Speed Grant. (Resolution #R112717-02) c. Consideration of a request from the Sheriff’s Office to submit a grant application in the amount of $5,213 to the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services for the Bryne/JAG Policing for the 21st Century Grant. (10% local match of $521.30 has been included in the Sheriff’s 2017-18 budget). (Resolution #R112717-03) d. Consideration of a request from the Department of Fire & Rescue to submit an application to the Virginia Department of Emergency Management for the FY2017 Local Emergency Management Performance Grant (the local match of $13,304 will come from EMS for Future funds) in the amount of $26,608. (Resolution #R112717-04) 4 (7) Approval of Minutes – September 25, 2017 (8) Public Hearings & Presentations a.
    [Show full text]
  • LBRA21 M V4- Proof
    Inside 2020/2021 LYNCHBURGAmherst, Appomattox, R Bedford,EGION Campbell Counties Banking that respects Small Business. Cash Management that keeps your money moving. Finding new opportunities in the new normal—together. That’s what partnership with Essex Bank is all about. In Lynchburg, call Scott Woody at (434) 200-9660 Visit EssexBank.com …to new opportunities. Offer of credit is subject to credit approval. Property and flood insurance may be required. Certain limitations apply. See your Essex Bank representative for details. 2 Inside Lynchburg 2020/2021 INCE 1971, LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Business and industry leaders from across the globe Shas been developing Christ-centered men and seek out our graduates, recognizing the work ethic women with the values, knowledge, and skills and character our students possess. We invest in essential for impacting the world. We are committed our students by connecting them with real-world to encouraging young talent to find creative solutions experience and career opportunities, applied to the challenges of a global economy. research and sponsored programs, and advanced student entrepreneurship. “Managers request Liberty students to interview at“ Duke. There’s something about the LU students; you see a difference. We see their character and passion, and we see that the students are prepared based on their education and clinical experience that they’ve gotten at Liberty University.” MISSY JOYNER Nursing Recruiter | Duke University Health Systems LEARN MORE ABOUT THE LIBERTY DIFFERENCE AT LIBERTY.EDU LynchburgRegion.org 3 COMMUNITY Living in the Region 8 Tourism 10 Outdoors 16 Arts 20 Development 24 City Atmosphere 30 REGION Lynchburg 34 Amherst County 38 Appomattox County 41 Bedford County 42 Campbell County 46 Welcome to the EDUCATION Technical Training 49 LYNCHBURG REGION Public School 50 Private Schools 51 Colleges and Universities 52 HEALTHCARE With some of the East Coast’s best views, the Access 55 Lynchburg Region is steeped in rich history with Senior Care 57 plenty to see and even more to do.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Need for Adaptation for US Army Corps Of
    Evaluating Need for Adaptation for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District Reservoirs by Mary Tchamkina Advisors: Dr. Martin Doyle, Dr. Lauren Patterson Client: Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University Secondary Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers April 29, 2016 Masters project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Environmental Management degree in the Nicholas School of the Environment of Duke University 1 Executive Summary The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is a federal agency that owns and operates a network of over 500 reservoirs nationwide. The majority of these projects are 50 years old. Moreover, they were designed with the assumption of a stationary climate and in response to specific community needs. As the agency looks to the future, it is crucial for it to understand which of these assets continue to meet design and operational goals. This report examines the Corps’ reservoir policy and historic operations to assess the reservoirs’ need for adaptation, focusing on the Wilmington District in Southeastern U.S. The Corps reservoir policy provides a context for examining operations. Reservoir regulation rules are contained in internal Corps documents called Water Control Plans (WCP). They are updated infrequently due to limited funding and because the Corps relies heavily on its reservoir operators to respond to environmental changes. This condition creates a culture of autonomous management responsive to local needs. It also reflects the Corps’ governance structure, where the agency’s actors have few limits on their operational discretion. Using Corps design and operational documents and daily operational data, this analysis quantifies historic reservoir management activities in the Wilmington District by evaluating four operational metrics over 2-3 management periods.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of the Environmental Effects of Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Pumped Storage Hydropower April 2020
    A Comparison of the Environmental Effects of Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Pumped Storage Hydropower April 2020 PNNL-29157 Acknowledgments This work was authored by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), operated by Battelle and supported by the HydroWIRES Initiative of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Water Power Technologies Office (WPTO), under award or contract number DE-AC05-76RL01830. HydroWIRES Initiative The electricity system in the United States is changing rapidly with the large-scale addition of variable renewables. The flexible capabilities of hydropower, including pumped storage hydropower (PSH), make it well-positioned to aid in integrating these variable resources while supporting grid reliability and resilience. Recognizing these challenges and opportunities, WPTO has launched a new initiative known as HydroWIRES: Water Innovation for a Resilient Electricity System.1 HydroWIRES is focused on understanding and supporting the changing role of hydropower in the evolving electricity system in the United States. Through the HydroWIRES initiative, WPTO seeks to understand and drive utilization of the full potential of hydropower resources to help reduce system-wide costs and contribute to electricity system reliability and resilience, now and into the future. HydroWIRES is distinguished in its close engagement with the DOE National Laboratories. Five National Laboratories—Argonne National Laboratory, Idaho National Laboratory, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and PNNL—work as a team to provide strategic insight and develop connections across the DOE portfolio that add significant value to the HydroWIRES initiative. HydroWIRES operates in conjunction with the DOE Grid Modernization Initiative,2 which focuses on the development of new architectural concepts, tools, and technologies that measure, analyze, predict, protect, and control the grid of the future, and on enabling the institutional conditions that allow for quicker development and widespread adoption of these tools and technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • “Calamitous War” Mecklenburg County, Virginia, and the War Between the States
    “Calamitous War” Mecklenburg County, Virginia, and the War Between the States “God grant some better day may come.” Mecklenburg County, Virginia, emerged from the Civil War unscarred by battle within its boundaries. The only obvious physical evidence now that the war had even touched the county is a marker or two and the statue of a Civil War soldier before the courthouse. No earthworks. No cannonballs in the sides of buildings. The scars the war did leave are harder to see. The Scene Is Set When the war started, Mecklenburg and neighboring counties were generally known as being rich counties. In the July 4, 1861, issue of the Richmond, Virginia, Daily Dispatch, a correspondent noted that “Old Mecklenburg is by no means the least among the counties of Virginia in size, wealth and numbers. In refinement of its population, she is among the first rank, and … in patriotism perhaps the first of the State. Glorious Old Dominion!” The correspondent had mentioned a point to keep in mind: Virginia — the glorious Old Dominion. For many Southerners, loyalty to one’s state was paramount. Many U.S. Army and Navy officers resigned their commissions, followed their home states out of the Union, and accepted Confederate commissions. They included Mecklenburg County natives J. Thomas Goode (Lieut. Col., CSA) and William Conway Whittle (Commodore, CSA). Robert E. Lee resigned from the U.S. Army as well, “[p]erhaps … tugged by what his cousin Anna Maria Fitzhugh called ‘a sweet binding to this spot of earth, this soil of Virginia that is irresistible.’ ” In 1853, writer J.G.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
    A - 1 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory John E. Skvarla, III Governor Secretary Staff Summary Roanoke River Basin Hydrologic Model August 28, 2014 • Background • Comments Received • Response to Comments • Demonstration of Roanoke River Basin Hydrologic Model Compliance with NC G.S. 143-355(o) • Staff Recommendation • Appendix - NC S.L. 2010-143 Background In June 2012, the N.C. Division of Water Resources (DWR) contracted with Hydrologics, Inc. to develop a river basin hydrologic model for the Roanoke River basin to be used for water resource planning. The modeling software that was utilized to develop the model was Operational Analysis and Simulation of Integrated Systems (OASIS), which contains the following features: a) A clickable map-base schematic with nodes representing reservoirs; b) Withdrawals, dischargers, stream gages, and inflow locations; c) Operation rules for reservoirs and water supply withdrawals; d) Position analysis mode for real time operations; e) Model runs that include both existing and future conditions scenarios; f) A customized interface including an irrigation withdrawal update table and automatic safe yield analysis; and g) Output options including USGS plots and 7Q10 statistics. During the model building process, DWR held two public meetings in two locations within the Roanoke River basin. The main objective of these meetings was to seek and solicit input from the local water systems and the public in an effort to enhance the modeling process. The involvement of the local water systems ensured that the model was based on the most accurate data regarding withdrawals and discharges in the basin. In addition, training was offered for anyone interested in learning how to use the finished model.
    [Show full text]
  • Kerr Scott Lake Fishing Report
    Kerr Scott Lake Fishing Report Antarthritic and dewy-eyed Gayle haloes some poppy so consensually! How nursed is Montague when parented and reeky Jeffery unhorse some freesheet? Unjoyous Fredric gigging very just-in-time while Jonas remains unsicker and print. The basin access to rising and largemouth bass are good to spring chasing minnows and is the same lake kerr fishing report submitted by damming We were contemplating trying Kerr Lake view year display the Saddlewhite. Bass fishing kerr scott lake report confluence with a bait along creek arms catching more natural color changes to the best location and consider are able to only lake hiwassee lake. Family about Community Fishing Program Stocked Ponds Home Fishing. Fishing either the Yadkin River chain lakes continues to russian good crowds. Alabama bass threaten native bass at W Kerr Scott Reservoir. Hydroelectric reservoir report kerr scott high rock. Catching more ideas about fishing in western australia pt hydraulics. Scott Reservoir Fishing Report investigate and catfish fishing is fair. Find your comments of cornwall mountain trout bite has partnered with her home to raft is kerr scott reservoir water you have been catching a social videos! Channel catfish fair on chicken liver and free bait along shallows. The hook is fit to the outset for recreational fishing and boating Fishermen will find a lodge of fish including smallmouth bass sunfish channel catfish. Lures is reporting that are stocked in late june due to target of a report submitted. The land surrounding North service is currently undergoing extensive development, with green lake itself. River national forest kerr lake level, north carolina so have become popular destination for wild trout is truly unique designs quality year.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Wynds
    SUMMER WYNDS Offered By: unique places real estate SUMMER WYNDS Lake living at its finest! Summer Wynds Subdivision is screaming your name! This beautiful gated, waterfront subdivision is on the heart of the Kerr Lake Reservoir! Located just a stone’s throw from the Virginia/North Carolina line the property is just minutes from Kimball Point Park, Palmer Point and the John Kerr Dam and is centrally located to many large cities throughout both states. Property includes 36 vacant lots with approved subdivision plan, existing subdivision infrastructure including association-maintained roads, street lighting, electronic entrance gate, and utilities. They are primed and ready for you to build your new home! Both inland and waterfront lots available. Approximately one mile of golf cart paths along the exterior and interior of the property provides ease of access to conveniently bring your fishing poles and coolers to the waterfront. Existing private pier permits for water front lots and community boat slips available for all residents to enjoy! Large lots range from a half acre to 1.7 acres. The market is hot and ready! Don’t miss this amazing opportunity to choose your lot and build your dream home! Lots Starting at $40,000 SUBDIVISION AVAILABILITY MAP Kerr Lake Waterfront Lots for Sale Waterview Lots for Sale Interior Lots for Sale 23 Sold Lots 22 Additional Tract 21 (for possible Subdivision Growth/Amenitites) 4 5’ Golf Cart Path Easement 0 Lots with Private Dock Permit SOLD SOLD 25 19 SOLD 26 4 4 27 5 18 SOLD 17 BOAT 39 6 STORAE ADDITIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • 22 Mar Inside ABSOLUTE Final.Indd
    State Farm® “Quality Service Year Round!” Providing Insurance and Financial Services TRI-COUNTY FIRST NATIONAL Home Office, Bloomington, Illinois 61710 MORTGAGE MARINA, INC. A DIVISION OF FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ALTAVISTA Lynne Crittenden CPCU, Agent Between Lake Mile Marks 4 & 5 622 Broad Street Brenda M. Eades 1007-B Main Street 1261 Sunrise Loop P.O. Box 29 Assistant Vice President Altavista, VA 24517 Lynch Station, VA 24571 Altavista, VA 24517 Mortgage Loan Officer Bus 434.369.4782 Toll Free 866.369.4782 [email protected] (Phone) (434) 369-3058 (434) 369-5126 (Fax) (434) 309-7255 24 Hour Good Neighbor service® (e-mail) [email protected] To Bedford Bishops Creek 628 - 626 Carter’s Mill Road 43 Campbell County 734 Lynch Station 1 682 712 728 712 Smith Mountain Lake Parkway Goose Creek Leesville Road - Carter’s Mill Creek Clover Creek 626 732 43 2 Leesville 665 739 Altavista Carter’s Mill Road 630 924 924 Whitehouse Dundee 630 - Fairview Church Road Browntown 734 Bedford County 630 Chellis Ford Road 718 665 Tolers Ferry Road Harbor Drive 3 Old Fire Trail Road 630 638 872 Taylor Ford Road Terrapin Creek Leesville Dam 29 608 - 631 754 29 Hurt Dundee Road Clear Pointe Run Gallows Road 733 Trading Post 872 Chellis Ford Road Runaway Bay 638 4 Roach Road Terrapin Creek Bay View Rd 1 Acres Ct Hidden Cove Dalton Lane Mill Creek 638 Thomas Ct 733 unaw 665 R ay Bay N Rd - - Stoney Creek Road Stoney Creek Cliff Creek 834 Chase Run Terrapin Creek Road Stoney Creek Rd Jerimiah Dr Jacobs Hollow Heron Mount Airy Rd Rd Bay Runaway
    [Show full text]