GENERAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL * Brussels, 20 Novembre 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

GENERAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL * Brussels, 20 Novembre 2017 Participants Belgium: Mr Didier REYNDERS Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign and European Affairs, with responsibility for Beliris and Federal Cultural Institutions Bulgaria: Ms Ekaterina ZAHARIEVA Deputy Prime Minister for Judicial Reform and Minister for Foreign Affairs Czech Republic: Mr Aleš CHMELAŘ State Secretary for European Affairs, Representative to the EU (Office of the Government) Denmark: Mr Anders SAMUELSEN Minister for Foreign Affairs Germany: Mr Michael ROTH Minister of State, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Estonia: Mr Matti MAASIKAS Deputy Minister for EU Affairs Ireland: Ms Helen McENTEE Minister of State for European Affairs Greece: Mr Georgios KATROUGKALOS Deputy Minister for European Affairs Spain: Mr Jorge TOLEDO ALBIÑANA State Secretary for the European Union France: Ms Nathalie LOISEAU Minister with responsibility for European Affairs, attached to the Minister for Europe and for Foreign Affairs Croatia: Ms Marija PEJČINOVIĆ BURIĆ Deputy Prime Minister of the Republic of Croatia and Minister for Foreign and European Affairs Italy: Mr Sandro GOZI State Secretary, Prime Minister's Office Cyprus: Mr Ioannis KASOULIDES Minister for Foreign Affairs Latvia: Mr Edgars RINKĒVIČS Minister for Foreign Affairs Lithuania: Mr Albinas ZANANAVIČIUS Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs Luxembourg Mr Nicolas SCHMIT Minister for Labour, Employment and the Social and Solidarity Economy Hungary: Mr Szabolcs TAKÁCS Minister of State for European Union Affairs, Prime Minister's Office Malta: Ms Helena DALLI Minister for European Affairs and Equality Netherlands: Mr Halbe ZIJLSTRA Minister for Foreign Affairs Austria: Mr Johann Georg SCHELLING Federal Minister for Finance Poland: Mr Konrad SZYMAŃSKI State Secretary for European Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Portugal: Ms Ana Paula ZACARIAS State Secretary for European Affairs Romania: Mr Victor NEGRESCU Minister with responsibility for European Affairs Slovenia: Mr Iztok MIROŠIČ State Secretary in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Slovakia: Mr Peter Javorčík Permanent Representative Finland: Mr Sampo TERHO Minister for European Affairs, Culture and Sport Sweden: Ms Ann LINDE Minister for EU Affairs and Trade United Kingdom: Mr Robin WALKER Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Department for Exiting the European Union Commission: Mr Frans TIMMERMANS First Vice-President .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Afscheid Van De Vertrekkende Leden
wetsvoorstellen over ritueel slachten, weigerambtenaren 9 en lesbisch ouderschap. Afscheid van de vertrekkende leden Voor volgers van de staatsrechtelijke ontwikkelingen bood deze parlementaire periode ook voldoende interessante Aan de orde is het afscheid van de vertrekkende leden. casus: het debat over het rapport van de Staatscommissie Grondwet, het correctief en raadgevend referendum, het De voorzitter: kiesrecht van de eilandsraden in Caribisch Nederland en Collegae. Vandaag komen wij voor het laatst in deze het Huis voor klokkenluiders. Ook heeft de Kamer bij een samenstelling bijeen. Vandaag en volgende week is de aantal gelegenheden gereflecteerd op de wijze van haar wisseling van de wacht. Dat gaat met enig ceremonieel verkiezing en haar positie in het staatsbestel ten opzichte gepaard: 35 van u nemen afscheid. Dit betekent dat wij veel van de andere staatsmachten. kennis, visie en ervaring kwijtraken. Wij troosten ons met de gedachte dat deze hopelijk volgende week vernieuwd De vele staatsrechtelijke ontwikkelingen leiden ertoe dat wordt met het aantreden van de nieuwe leden. Een instituut de Kamer meermaals overleg heeft gevoerd met de Raad is immers zo krachtig als zijn mensen. van State. In februari 2012 heeft de Kamer voor het eerst gebruikgemaakt van de mogelijkheid om aan de Afdeling Vandaag staat echter niet alleen in het teken van het advisering van de Raad van State rechtstreeks voorlichting afscheid van een groot aantal collega's. Wij markeren ook te vragen. Het betrof de Wet normering topinkomens en het einde van de Kamerperiode 2011-2015. Voordat ik de de Wet op het accountantsberoep. Sindsdien is nog twee- collega's die afscheid nemen met een enkel woord toe- maal voorlichting gevraagd over respectievelijk artikel 13 spreek, wil ik dan ook graag van de gelegenheid gebruikma- van de Zorgverzekeringswet en de democratische controle ken om kort stil te staan bij de ontwikkelingen die de Kamer in de Europese Unie.
[Show full text]
Secretary of State for Integration and Migration of the Portuguese Government
Secretary of State for Integration and Migration of the Portuguese Government Regional Review of the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration in the UNECE region (12 and 13 November 2020) Roundtable 1 – GCM Objectives 14, 15, 16, 19, 20 and 22 Statement “From the Floor” Portugal has worked in the field of migration for more than 20 years, developing public policies to better integrate migrants in our society, as recognized in the most recent OECD International Migration Outlook 20. Portugal stands out in the development of a whole of society approach, evolving not only the Central administration, but also the local level as well as civil society in the development of integration policies. Integration is a two-way process, where both the hosting society and migrants benefit from each other, in each territory and specific reality. The Portuguese long tradition on welcoming migrants is anchored in a policy of integration of proximity. Since 2003, with the creation of the local centres for the support of the integration of migrants, we developed a proximity service that improves the local participation and integration, allowing migrants to be part of their integration process. Today, we count with 3 national support centres and 109 local support centres spread across the country. These proximity services provide support for migrants in their integration process, namely regarding documentation, access to Portuguese language courses, housing and education. This focus on our main objective: we want to develop structural policies to reduce inequalities between migrants and nationals and to provide equal rights for every citizen that seeks our country to live and contribute, now and for the future.
[Show full text]
Perspectives on New Dynamics in EU Governance
DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS The European Council and the Council: perspectives on new dynamics in EU governance In-Depth Analysis Abstract The European Council and the Council play a central role in policy- making within those new areas of EU activity within which intergovernmental policy coordination prevails over legislative decision- making such economic governance and foreign affairs. The emphasis on decentralised governance implies important changes to institutional design and the practice of inter-institutional relations. PE 510.004 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee Constitutional Affairs. AUTHOR Mr Uwe Puetter Central European University Budapest RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Mr Petr Novak Policy Department Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in January 2015 European Parliament, © European Union, 2015 This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. The European Council and the Council: perspectives on new dynamics in EU governance ___________________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 4 LIST OF FIGURES 5 Executive SUMMARY 6 1.
[Show full text]
Great Expectations: the Experienced Credibility of Cabinet Ministers and Parliamentary Party Leaders
Great expectations: the experienced credibility of cabinet ministers and parliamentary party leaders Sabine van Zuydam [email protected] Concept, please do not cite Paper prepared for the NIG PUPOL international conference 2016, session 4: Session 4: The Political Life and Death of Leaders 1 In the relationship between politics and citizens, political leaders are essential. While parties and issues have not become superfluous, leaders are required to win support of citizens for their views and plans, both in elections and while in office. To be successful in this respect, credibility is a crucial asset. Research has shown that credible leaders are thought to be competent, trustworthy, and caring. What requires more attention is the meaning of competent, caring, and trustworthy leaders in the eyes of citizens. In this paper the question is needed to be credible according to citizens in different leadership positions, e.g. cabinet ministers and parliamentary party leaders. To answer this question, it was studied what is expected of leaders in terms of competence, trustworthiness, and caring by conducting an extensive qualitative analysis of Tweets and newspaper articles between August 2013 and June 2014. In this analysis, four Dutch leadership cases with a contrasting credibility rating were compared: two cabinet ministers (Frans Timmermans and Mark Rutte) and two parliamentary party leaders (Emile Roemer and Diederik Samsom). This analysis demonstrates that competence relates to knowledgeability, decisiveness and bravery, performance, and political strategy. Trustworthiness includes keeping promises, consistency in views and actions, honesty and sincerity, and dependability. Caring means having an eye for citizens’ needs and concern, morality, constructive attitude, and no self-enrichment.
[Show full text]
Page 1 Halsbury's Laws of England (3) RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE
Page 1 Halsbury's Laws of England (3) RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CROWN AND THE JUDICIARY 133. The monarch as the source of justice. The constitutional status of the judiciary is underpinned by its origins in the royal prerogative and its legal relationship with the Crown, dating from the medieval period when the prerogatives were exercised by the monarch personally. By virtue of the prerogative the monarch is the source and fountain of justice, and all jurisdiction is derived from her1. Hence, in legal contemplation, the Sovereign's Majesty is deemed always to be present in court2 and, by the terms of the coronation oath and by the maxims of the common law, as also by the ancient charters and statutes confirming the liberties of the subject, the monarch is bound to cause law and justice in mercy to be administered in all judgments3. This is, however, now a purely impersonal conception, for the monarch cannot personally execute any office relating to the administration of justice4 nor effect an arrest5. 1 Bac Abr, Prerogative, D1: see COURTS AND TRIBUNALS VOL 24 (2010) PARA 609. 2 1 Bl Com (14th Edn) 269. 3 As to the duty to cause law and justice to be executed see PARA 36 head (2). 4 2 Co Inst 187; 4 Co Inst 71; Prohibitions del Roy (1607) 12 Co Rep 63. James I is said to have endeavoured to revive the ancient practice of sitting in court, but was informed by the judges that he could not deliver an opinion: Prohibitions del Roy (1607) 12 Co Rep 63; see 3 Stephen's Commentaries (4th Edn) 357n.
[Show full text]
The New Eu Foreign Policy Architecture
THE NEW EU FOREIGN POLICY ARCHITECTURE REVIEWING THE FIRST TWO YEARS OF THE EEAS NIKLAS HELWIG PAUL IVAN HRANT KOSTANYAN CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES (CEPS) BRUSSELS The Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) is an independent policy research institute in Brussels. Its mission is to produce sound policy research leading to constructive solutions to the challenges facing Europe. The views expressed in this book are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed to CEPS or any other institution with which they are associated or to the European Union. Niklas Helwig is a Marie Curie Researcher of the EXACT network at the University of Edinburgh and Cologne and focuses on the institutional development of EU foreign policy. He worked for the Centre for European Policy Studies and the Finnish Institute of International Affairs. Paul Ivan is a Romanian diplomat. Previously, he worked as a researcher for the Centre for European Policy Studies, where he focused on EU political and institutional issues and the European External Action Service. Hrant Kostanyan is an associate research fellow at CEPS and a PhD candidate at the Centre for EU Studies at Ghent University. He worked as an external expert for International Alert, based in London, in the Eastern Europe and South Caucasus research project. He also worked as an expert on a European Commission-funded project on the EU’s relations with Russia and the Eastern Partnership at the EU Neighbourhood Info Centre. The authors thank Piotr Maciej Kaczyński for his comments on an earlier draft. ISBN 978-94-6138-262-7 © Copyright 2013, Centre for European Policy Studies and the authors.
[Show full text]
Reforms in the Arab Region
REFORMS IN THE ARAB REGION The Advisory Council on International Affairs is an advisory body for the Dutch P R OSPECTS FOR DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW ? government and parliament. In particular its reports address the policy of the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Minister of Defence and the Minister for European Affairs and No. 75, M a y 2011 International Cooperation. The Council will function as un umbrella body with committees responsible for human rights, peace and security, development cooperation and European integration. While retaining expert knowledge in these areas, the aim of the Council is to integrate the p r ovision of advice. Its staff are: Ms D.E. van Norr e n , T. D.J. Oostenbrink, A . D. Uilenreef, M . W.M. Wa a n d e rs and Ms A.M.C. We s t e r. A D V I S O R Y COUNCIL ON INTERNATIONAL AFFA I R S A D V I S O R Y COUNCIL ON INTERNATIONAL AFFA I R S P.O.BOX 20061, 2500 EB THE HAGUE, THE NETHERLANDS ADVIESRAAD INTERNATIONALE VRAAGSTUKKEN TELEPHONE +31(0)70 348 5108/60 60 FAX +31(0)70 348 6256 A I V E-MAIL [email protected] INTERNET WWW.AIV-ADVICE.NL Members of the Advisory Council on International Affairs Chair F. Korthals Altes Vice-chair Professor W.J.M. van Genugten Members Ms L.Y. Gonçalves-Ho Kang You Dr P.C. Plooij-van Gorsel Professor A. de Ruijter Ms M. Sie Dhian Ho Professor A. van Staden Lt.
[Show full text]
GENERAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL Brussels, 22 September 2020 Participants
GENERAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL Brussels, 22 September 2020 Participants Belgium: Mr Koen GEENS Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Justice, with responsibility for the Buildings Agency, and Minister for European Affairs Bulgaria: Mr Petko DOYKOV Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs Czechia: Mr Tomáš PETŘÍČEK Minister for Foreign Affairs Denmark: Mr Jeppe KOFOD Minister for Foreign Affairs Germany: Mr Michael ROTH Minister of State for Europe, Federal Foreign Office Estonia: Mr Märt VOLMER Deputy Minister for EU Affairs Ireland Mr Thomas BYRNE Minister of State for European Affairs Greece: Mr Miltiadis VARVITSIOTIS Deputy Minister, with responsibility for European Affairs Spain: Mr Juan GONZÁLEZ-BARBA PERA State Secretary for the European Union France: Mr Clément BEAUNE Minister of State with responsibility for European Affairs, attached to the Minister for Europe and for Foreign Affairs Croatia: Ms Irena ANDRASSY Permanent Representative Italy: Mr Vincenzo AMENDOLA Minister for European Affairs Cyprus: Mr Nicholas EMILIOU Permanent Representative Latvia: Ms Sanita PAVĻUTA-DESLANDES Permanent Representative Lithuania: Mr Albinas ZANANAVIČIUS Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs Luxembourg: Mr Jean ASSELBORN Minister for Foreign and European Affairs, Minister for Immigration and Asylum Hungary: Ms Judit VARGA Minister for Justice Malta: Mr Stefan ZRINZO AZZOPARDI Parliamentary Secretary for European Funds within the Ministry for Foreign and European Affairs Netherlands: Mr Stef BLOK Minister for Foreign Affairs Austria: Mr Nikolaus MARSCHIK Permanent
[Show full text]
025524/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt Am 01/07/20
025524/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt am 01/07/20 Council of the European Union Brussels, 30 June 2020 (OR. en) 9250/20 POLGEN 91 NOTE From: General Secretariat of the Council To: Delegations Subject: Draft agendas for Council meetings, during the second semester of 2020 (the German Presidency) In accordance with Article 2(7) of the Council's Rules of Procedure, delegations will find attached the indicative agendas1 for Council meetings for the period from 1 July 2020 up to 31 December 2020. These have been drawn up by the German Presidency and the External Action Service as regards the Foreign Affairs Council (FAC) In accordance with Article 3(6) of the Council's Rules of Procedure, items for which approval by the Council is possible without discussion are entered as "A" items. As a general rule, "A" items do not appear on the attached provisional Council agendas. In accordance with Annex V, para 6 of the Council's Rules of Procedure, no item is placed on the Council agenda simply for presentation by the Commission or by a Council member, except where a debate on new major initiatives is planned. 1 In accordance with the Treaty of Lisbon, on all agendas for the various Council configurations a distinction has to be made between legislative and non-legislative acts, in the case of both "A" items and "B" items. 9250/20 1 GIP.1 EN www.parlament.gv.at ANNEX The German Presidency - 2nd semester 2020 Draft Work Programme for Council meetings Prepared by COREPER (Part 2) COUNCIL DATE July August September October November December GENERAL AFFAIRS 10 15 22 13 12 (Cohesion) 8 Poss.
[Show full text]
I1nnrrekeniing 20I5 SP
,I1nnrrekeniing 20I5 SP ten behoeve van het Partijraad d.d. 25 juni 2016 JAARREKENING SP 2015 Inhoudsopgave hoofdstuk pagina hoofdstuk pagina 0 Toelichting bij Jaarrekening SP 2015 Voorwoord 3 Activiteiten 6 Balans en resultatenrekening 2015 1.1 Balans 19 1.2 Resultatenrekening 20 1.3 Uitgangspunten bij de jaarrekening 21 2 Controleverklaring 24 Jaarrekening SP 2015 tbv Partijraad dd. 25 juni 2015 Jaarverslag 2015 Voorwoord Deze jaarrekening is een geconsolideerde jaarrekening van de vereniging SP en een aantal aan de SP verbonden stichtingen: stichting Beheer SP, stichting Personeel SP, stichting Wetenschappelijk Bureau SP, stichting Studiecentrum SP en de vereniging ROOD. De statutaire vestigingsplaats van de vereniging SP en de aan de SP verbonden stichtingen is Rotterdam. De vereniging stelt zich ten doel het verwezenlijken van een socialistische maatschappij in Nederland, een maatschappij waarin de menselijke waardigheid, de gelijkwaardigheid van mensen en de solidariteit tussen mensen daadwerkelijk gestalte krijgen. Het partijbestuur bestond in 2015 uit: —de voorzitter en de algemeen secretaris, die rechtstreeks door het congres gekozen zijn; -- negen algemeen bestuursleden, rechtstreeks gekozen door het congres; —twintig regiovertegenwoordigers/leden partijbestuur, door de regioconferenties gekozen; — de SP-fractievoorzitters in de Tweede en Eerste Kamer en het Europees Parlement. Hierbij moet aangetekend worden dat er op 28 november op het XXI congres in Maarssen een nieuw partijbestuur gekozen is. De belangrijkste veranderingen zijn de verkiezing van een nieuwe partijvoorzitter -te weten Ron Meyer- en een uitbreiding van het aantal algemeen bestuursleden van negen naar elf. Het dagelijks bestuur werd tot eind november 2015 gevormd door Jan Marijnissen (voorzitter), Hans van Heijningen (algemeen secretaris), Emile Roemer, Rosita van Gijlswijk (penningmeester), Vincent Mulder en Renske Leijten (die halverwege het jaar terugtrad).
[Show full text]
Internal Circulation Only
COMPLETE TOB UPTO AMENDMENT SERIES NO. 63, (Amendment dated 02.01.2013) 2 RASHTRAPATI BHAVAN NEW DELHI January 14, 1961. __________________ Pausa 24, 1882(S) ORDER THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA (TRANSACTION OF BUSINESS) RULES In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (3) of article 77 of the Constitution and in supersession of all previous rules and orders on the subject, the President hereby makes the following rules for the more convenient transaction of the business of the Government of India: - 1. Short Title.- These rules may be called the Government of India (Transaction of Business) Rules, 1961. 2. Definition.- In these rules, "department" means any of the Ministries, Departments, Secretariats and Offices specified in the First Schedule to the Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1961. 3. Disposal of Business by Ministries.- Subject to the provisions of these Rules in regard to consultation with other departments and submission of cases to the Prime Minister, the Cabinet and its Committees and the President, all business allotted to a department under the Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1961, shall be disposed of by, or under the general or special directions of, the Minister-in-charge. 4. Inter-Departmental Consultations.- (1) When the subject of a case concerns more than one department, no decision be taken or order issued until all such departments have concurred, or, failing such concurrence, a decision thereon has been taken by or under the authority of the Cabinet. Explanation- Every case in which a decision, if taken in one Department, is likely to affect the transaction of business allotted to another department, shall be deemed to be a case the subject of which concerns more than one department.
[Show full text]
Gubernatorial Appointment Process
GUBERNATORIAL APPOINTMENT PROCESS The selection of qualified individuals to serve in state governmental positions excepted or exempted from state civil service is a responsibility shared by the executive and the legislative branches of government. This joint participation in the appointment process is mandated by the Constitution of the State of Michigan of 1963, which accords the governor certain powers to appoint officials subject to the advice and consent of the Michigan Senate. Historical Developments To gain a broader perspective of the governor’s appointment powers and the use of advice and consent, it is useful to trace the historical development of the executive/legislative relationship regarding appointments. Due to the deep-seated distrust of, and contempt for, British-imposed colonial governors, many early state constitutions greatly limited the power of the office of the governor. Michigan’s first constitution (1835), however, did not follow that pattern — it gave the governor substantial power. The governor had the power to appoint the secretary of state, judges of the supreme court, the auditor general, the attorney general, and prosecuting attorneys for each county. These appointments were subject to Senate confirmation. The only state officers popularly elected were the governor, lieutenant governor, and state legislators. In contrast, the 1850 constitution reflected the influence of “Jacksonian democracy,” ultimately producing the so-called “long ballot.” Among the principles of Jacksonian democracy was the belief that public officials should be chosen by election rather than by appointment. The 1850 con- sti tution provided for the election of all principal state officials, including the secretary of state, state treasurer, attorney general, auditor general, superintendent of public instruction, regents of the University of Michigan, state board of education, and supreme court justices.
[Show full text]