DOCSLIB.ORG

Judicial Commission Annual Report 2011-12

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Judicial Commission Annual Report 2011-12 1 P R E L I M Judicial Commission of NSW I N A R I E S Annual Report 2011–12 Judicial Commission of NSW PRELIMINARIES i 1 . PRELIMINARIES Our focus for 2011–12 1.2 Welcome to the annual report Contents Examining complaints Our annual report informs those we serve and our partners 1 Preliminaries . inside front cover was on educational • met our target to examine all complaints within about our yearly performance and programs. Highlights . inside front cover 12 months: see p 25 Welcome to the annual report . 1 This annual report reviews our output and activities during the innovation and using • examined 90 complaints: see p 26 2011–12 financial year. Our legislative charter is the Judicial How to read this annual report . 1 • responded to 426 requests for advice and information Officers Act 1986. This Act specifies three functions which are Reporting framework . 1 new technology to about the complaints process: see p 26 the key operational activities in our Strategic Plan and Results Our profile . 2 and Services Plan. These functions are to: Who we are . 2 1. provide a continuing education and training program for Strategic focus . 2 benefit the judiciary. Partners about 330 judicial officers in NSW (see pp 30–35 ) Our vision . 2 • provided advice and research assistance to Legal Aid 2. assist the courts to achieve consistency in imposing Our mission . 2 NSW: see p 54 sentences by monitoring sentences and publishing Our values . 2 information and reports on sentencing (see pp 36–41) 1.1 Highlights • presented at the World Bank-sponsored International Our partners . 2 Symposium on Judicial Reform in Ankara, Turkey: 3. examine complaints made about a judicial officer’s ability Our people . 2 or behaviour (see pp 42–47). Continuing judicial education program see p 55 Our structure . 2 • assisted Indonesian Supreme Court and Indonesian This is our 25th annual report. Last year’s annual report gained a Our governance . 2 • judicial satisfaction with the education program at a Judicial Commission through the Australia Indonesia Gold Award in the 2012 Australasian Reporting Awards. Letter to Attorney General . 2 Partnership for Justice Program: see p 55 10-year high, increasing from 93% to 95%: see p 14 Our history . 3 • participated in the Fifth International Conference on To reduce the environmental impact, this report and other Judicial • produced 21 publications: see p 17 Performance results for 2011–12 . 4 Training of the Judiciary organised by the International Commission publications can be downloaded from our website at • provided 34 education sessions: see p 17 Organisation for Judicial Training in Bordeaux, France: www.judcom.nsw.gov.au. They are also available on request. Year at a glance . 6 • provided iPad training and support for magistrates: see p 57 President’s foreword . 8 see p 18 Chief Executive’s message . 9 • added a Ngara Yura section to our website: see p 34 How to read this annual report 2 Performance . 10 People This report is divided into sections: an overview of the Providing continuing judicial education Commission and our performance for the year, including and training . 12 Research and sentencing program • staff satisfaction at an all-time high of 96%: see p 66 information about measured outcomes, targets, challenges and Assisting the courts to achieve • retained low employee turnover rate of 3%: see p 66 statistics (pp 2–27); our three key programs — continuing judicial consistency in sentencing . 19 • use of criminal law information on our website at an • increased our training and professional development education and training; research and sentencing; and examining Examining complaints . 24 all-time high, growing by 51%: see p 20 complaints (pp 28–47); engagement with our partners hours: see p 67 3 Programs . 28 • use of the online Judicial Information Research System (pp 48–69); information about our people (pp 58–69) our • exceeded NSW Government equal employment Continuing judicial education (JIRS) at an all-time high, averaging 99,172 hits each practices, principles and processes (pp 70–81); and a detailed opportunity and culturally and linguistically diverse and training . 30 month: see p 22 financial report (pp 82–107). benchmarking targets in staff profile: see pp 68–69 Research and sentencing . 36 • met our target to publish two major research studies: Examining complaints . 42 see p 39 Reporting framework 4 Partners . 48 • reviewed and republished over 40 suggested jury Practices, policies and processes directions: see p 39 We have adopted elements of the Global Reporting Initiative 5 People . 58 6 Practices, policies and processes . 70 • developed an application and voice recognition function • 11 Commission meetings held: see p 73 (GRI) in this report, identified in the GRI’s Sustainability for quick access on iPads to the Judicial Information • 4 Audit and Risk Management Committee meetings Reporting Guidelines (Version 3). 7 Finance . 82 Research System: see p 40 held: see p 74 Appendices . 108 The specially designed logo above, is used to show where we • updated and settled internal audit plan: see p 74 report in relation to the GRI indicators. The logo symbolises Glossary . 127 • ensured a safe working environment: see p 78 that the Judicial Commission is committed to thinking Index . 128 Cover photo: iPads were issued to Local Court magistrates this • 5% reduction in office energy use: see p 80 progressively about sustainability. GRI Index . 130 year and we provided training in how to use them and developed Five years at a glance . inside back cover an app and voice recognition function. Pictured are our computer Page 130 provides the GRI index of standard disclosures and training officer Joy Blunt (standing) with the Deputy Chief where these are located in this annual report. Magistrate of the Local Court, Jane Mottley. 1 1 Our values P Connecting R We value our partners and work cooperatively with them. E Our mission is to L Professionalism I We are recognised for our integrity, our independence, and M foster public the high quality services we deliver. I Enhancement N confidence in the We continually improve the way we do business. A R Sustainability I We will consider the way our operations, products and judicial system of E services impact on people, the environment and the S NSW . economy. Our partners We provide services to the judicial officers and people of NSW, the courts, the legal profession, other justice sector agencies, law libraries and law students. We share our experience with other Australian and overseas judicial 1.4 Our history For 25 years, the 1.3 Our profile education providers. 1985 Who we are Controversies involving judicial officers in Australia are Judicial Commission reported in the media. The Judicial Commission of New South Wales is an Our people independent statutory corporation established under the We employed the equivalent of 34 full-time staff in 2011–12. 1986 of NSW has promoted Judicial Officers Act 1986. We report to the Parliament of NSW Government announces the establishment of the New South Wales. Judicial Commission in response to a perceived crisis in Our structure public confidence in the judiciary. Judicial Officers Act excellence in judicial Strategic focus The Commission has three divisions — education, research 1986 commences in December 1986. The Commission and sentencing, and complaints. See our organisation combines a complaints function with educational and performance. As the first organisation of its kind in Australia, we have chart on p 72. sentencing research roles. developed a high level of expertise in judicial education, sentencing research, judicial support and case management 1987 systems. We provide continuing judicial education, conduct Our governance Judicial Officers Act amended to establish the 2006 an extensive research program into sentencing law and An independent Commission of 10 members guides Commission as an independent statutory authority. Equality Before the Law Bench Book launched in June and practice, and provide sentencing information to the courts our strategic direction and examines all complaints. The Operations commence in October. Sentencing Bench Book in September. and government agencies. We also examine complaints Chief Executive, supported by three directors, manages 1988 made about a judicial officer’s ability or behaviour. our daily operations. See pp 60–63 for their profiles and Education program commenced. First annual court 2007 achievements. An important part of our work is to share our accumulated conference held in June. Local Court Bench Book and Judicial Officers Act amended to provide for lay knowledge and experience with the national and global Judicial Officers’ Bulletin launched. representation on a Conduct Division. network of judiciaries and other judicial education Civil Trials Bench Book launched in June. Commission providers. This aspect of our social performance and its 1990 Letter to Attorney General celebrates 20 years of successful operations in October. impact is reported in the Partners section at p 48. Chief Justice Gleeson AC launches the Sentencing Information System (SIS) to help judicial officers improve 2010 The Honourable Gregory Smith SC MP consistency in approach to sentencing. Criminal Trial Local Court Bench Book published on the Commission’s Our vision Attorney General and Minister for Justice Courts Bench Book launched. Governor Macquarie Tower, Sydney NSW 2000 website. All Commission bench books are now publicly The people of NSW will have confidence in the exceptional 1996 accessible. ability and performance of judges and magistrates. Dear Attorney SIS becomes part of the Judicial Information Research 2011 System (JIRS). The Judicial Commission of NSW has pleasure in Two magistrates separately address Parliament after Our mission presenting to you the report of its activities for the year 1998 Conduct Division reports are made to the Governor. ended 30 June 2012. • To foster public confidence in the judicial system by A judge addresses Parliament after a Conduct Division Parliament votes not to remove the magistrates from providing continuing education for judicial officers, judicial office.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Place of Lawyers in Politics
    THE HON T F BATHURST AC CHIEF JUSTICE OF NEW SOUTH WALES THE PLACE OF LAWYERS IN POLITICS OPENING OF LAW TERM DINNER ∗ 31 JANUARY 2018 1. As a young boy learning his table manners in the 1950s, the old adage “never discuss politics in polite company” was a lesson that was not lost on me. Even for those of you who did not grow up in the era of Emily Post, I am assured the adage still holds true. 2. When I stood here to give this same address last year, I was under the naïve impression that I had given the topic a wide berth. That is, until I woke to the unwelcome image of my face splashed across the front page of the morning paper. So, eager to avoid my naivety being mistaken for political pointedness and at the risk of casting aspersions on the “polite” character of the present company, I’ve decided to throw the old rule book out the window, launch myself into the bear pit and confront the issue head on. Tonight I want to ask: to what extent should lawyers, in their professional capacity, involve themselves in political debate, criticise government policy, or advocate for particular political outcomes. 3. The particular topic was inspired, oddly enough, by an incident which occurred in discussion surrounding the same sex marriage issue. You will recall that Mr Alan Joyce, the Chief Executive Officer of Qantas came out in support of a ‘Yes’ vote at the plebiscite. It was suggested to him that he should stick to his knitting.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook 2000
    THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES S nz Faculty of Law HANDBOOK 2000 THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES & Faculty of Law HANDBOOK 2000 Courses, programs and any arrangements for programs including staff allocated as stated in this Handbook are an expression of intent only. The University reserves the right to discontinue or vary arrangements at any time without notice. Information has been brought up to date as at 17 November 1999, but may be amended without notice by the University Council. © The University of New South Wales The address of the University of New South Wales is: The University of New South Wales SYDNEY 2052 AUSTRALIA Telephone: (02) 93851000 Facsimile: (02) 9385 2000 Email: [email protected] Telegraph: UNITECH, SYDNEY Telex: AA28054 http://www.unsw.edu.au Designed and published by Publishing and Printing Services, The University of New South Wales Printed by Sydney Allen Printers Pty Ltd ISSN 1323-7861 Contents Welcome 1 Changes to Academic Programs In 2000 3 Calendar of Dates 5 Staff 7 Handbook Guide 9 Faculty Information 11 General Faculty Information and Assistance 11 Faculty of Law Enrolment Procedures 11 Guidelines for Maximum Workload 11 Full-time Status 11 Part-time Status 11 Assessment of Student Progress 11 General Education Program 11 Professional Associates 12 Prizes 12 Advanced Standing 12 Cross Institutional Studies and Exchange Programs 12 Financial Assistance to Students 12 Commitment to Equal Opportunity In Education 13 Equal Opportunity in Education Policy Statement 13 Special Government Policies
    [Show full text]
  • Women and Gender in the Royal Commission Into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody
    Missing Subjects: Women and Gender in The Royal Commission Into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody Author Marchetti, Elena Maria Published 2005 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School School of Criminology and Criminal Justice DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/335 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/366882 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au MISSING SUBJECTS: WOMEN AND GENDER IN THE ROYAL COMMISSION INTO ABORIGINAL DEATHS IN CUSTODY Elena Maria Marchetti BCom LLB (Hons) LLM School of Criminology and Criminal Justice Faculty of Arts Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2005 ABSTRACT Although the Australian Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (RCIADIC) tabled its National Report over a decade ago, its 339 recommendations are still used to steer Indigenous justice policy. The inquiry is viewed by many policy makers and scholars as an important source of knowledge regarding the post-colonial lives of Indigenous people. It began as an investigation into Indigenous deaths in custody, but its scope was later broadened to encompass a wide range of matters affecting Indigenous Australians. There have been numerous criticisms made about the way the investigation was conducted and about the effectiveness and appropriateness of the recommendations made. Of particular relevance to this thesis are those criticisms that have highlighted the failure of the RCIADIC to consider the problems confronting Indigenous women. It has been claimed that although problems such as family violence and the sexual abuse of Indigenous women by police were acknowledged by both the RCIADIC and other scholars as having a significant impact upon the lives of Indigenous women, the RCIADIC failed to address these and other gender-specific problems.
    [Show full text]
  • STOLEN GENERATIONS’ REPORT by RON BRUNTON
    BETRAYING Backgrounder THE VICTIMS THE ‘STOLEN GENERATIONS’ REPORT by RON BRUNTON The seriousness of the ‘stolen generations’ issue should not be underestimated, and Aborigines are fully entitled to demand an acknowledgement of the wrongs that many of them suffered at the hands of various authorities. But both those who were wronged and the nation as a whole are also entitled to an honest and rigorous assessment of the past. This should have been the task of the ‘stolen generations’ inquiry. Unfortunately, however, the Inquiry’s report, Bringing Them Home, is one of the most intellectually and morally irresponsible official documents produced in recent years. In this Backgrounder, Ron Brunton carefully examines a number of matters covered by the report, such as the representativeness of the cases it discussed, its comparison of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal child removals, and its claim that the removal of Aboriginal children constituted ‘genocide’. He shows how the report is fatally compromised by serious failings. Amongst many others, these failings include omitting crucial evidence, misrepresenting important sources, making assertions that are factually wrong or highly questionable, applying contradictory principles at different times so as to make the worst possible case against Australia, and confusing different circumstances under which removals occurred in order to give the impression that nearly all separations were ‘forced’. February 1998, Vol. 10/1, rrp $10.00 BETRAYING THE VICTIMS: THE ‘STOLEN GENERATIONS’ REPORT bitterness that other Australians need to comprehend INTRODUCTION and overcome. A proper recognition of the injustices that Aborigi- nes suffered is not just a matter of creating opportuni- ties for reparations, despite the emphasis that the Bring- The Inquiry and its background ing Them Home report places on monetary compensa- Bringing Them Home, the report of the National Inquiry tion (for example, pages 302–313; Recommendations into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Is- 14–20).
    [Show full text]
  • Dialogue and Indigenous Policy in Australia
    Dialogue and Indigenous Policy in Australia Darryl Cronin A thesis in fulfilment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Social Policy Research Centre Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences September 2015 ABSTRACT My thesis examines whether dialogue is useful for negotiating Indigenous rights and solving intercultural conflict over Indigenous claims for recognition within Australia. As a social and political practice, dialogue has been put forward as a method for identifying and solving difficult problems and for promoting processes of understanding and accommodation. Dialogue in a genuine form has never been attempted with Indigenous people in Australia. Australian constitutionalism is unable to resolve Indigenous claims for recognition because there is no practice of dialogue in Indigenous policy. A key barrier in that regard is the underlying colonial assumptions about Indigenous people and their cultures which have accumulated in various ways over the course of history. I examine where these assumptions about Indigenous people originate and demonstrate how they have become barriers to dialogue between Indigenous people and governments. I investigate historical and contemporary episodes where Indigenous people have challenged those assumptions through their claims for recognition. Indigenous people have attempted to engage in dialogue with governments over their claims for recognition but these attempts have largely been rejected on the basis of those assumptions. There is potential for dialogue in Australia however genuine dialogue between Indigenous people and the Australian state is impossible under a colonial relationship. A genuine dialogue must first repudiate colonial and contemporary assumptions and attitudes about Indigenous people. It must also deconstruct the existing colonial relationship between Indigenous people and government.
    [Show full text]
  • University of New South Wales Law School 40 Anniversary
    University of New South Wales Law School 40 th Anniversary Chief Justice Robert French AC 17 September 2011, Sydney Chancellor, Dean, Attorney-General, Sir Gerard Brennan, Ladies and Gentlemen, there seems to be a fascination with '40' that requires human beings to celebrate or mourn anniversaries bearing that number. This may have something to do with its biblical significance and the seepage of that significance into popular culture. According to the usual unreliable sources, '40' represents a period of waiting, preparation, testing or punishment. So the Old Testament recounts 40 days of life 1 2 extinguishing global inundation, 40 years of wandering in the desert and the 3 40 days it took to embalm Jacob. On a more positive note the Gospel of Barnabas predicted that the end of the world would be followed by 40 years of darkness after which God would give life to his Messenger, his angels and the elect. Looking up the meaning of '40' on the web, I came across a numerological calculator called the Gematria which will add up the values of the letters of a name yielding a number based on those letters which may or may not have symbolic significance. Having found no symbolic significance attaching to any variant of my own name, I keyed in 'Hal', the name of the Foundation Dean of the Law School. This yielded a positive result. According to the Gematria, 'Hal' equates to the number 39, which is said to be symbolic of 'the organisation and the solidarity of the ______________________ 1 Genesis 7, 4. 2 Nb 32, 13.
    [Show full text]
  • THE JOURNAL of the NSW BAR ASSOCIATION | SUMMER 2016 Contents
    barTHE JOURNAL OFnews THE NSW BAR ASSOCIATION | SUMMER 2016 news THE JOURNAL OF NSW BAR ASSOCIATION | SUMMER 2016 bar Bar News Summer 2016 22Nov16 OL.indd 1 22/11/16 12:26 pm barnewsTHE JOURNAL OF THE NSW BAR ASSOCIATION | SUMMER 2016 Contents 2 Editor’s note Bar News Editorial Committee Jeremy Stoljar SC (chair) 3 Out of the archives Greg Burton SC 4 President’s column Kristina Stern SC Anthony Cheshire SC 5 Letters to the editor Dominic Villa Daniel Tynan 6 News Nicolas Kirby Daniel Klineberg Lionel Robberds AM QC: 50 years at the NSW Bar Catherine Gleeson Bar Practice Course 02/2016 Victoria Brigden Caroline Dobraszczyk Tedeschi QC snaps Bar Council in session Talitha Fishburn Juliet Curtin 9 Recent developments Radhika Withana Kevin Tang 21 Practice Charles Gregory Uche Okereke-Fisher SILQ v BarBooks Chris Winslow (Bar Association) Gender equitable briefng at the New South Wales Bar Four readers share their experiences starting out at the bar ISSN 0817-0002 Views expressed by contributors to Bar News are 33 Address not necessarily those of the New South Wales Bar Association. Contributions are welcome and should Lawyers and politics: the 2016 Hal Wootten Lecture be addressed to the editor, Jeremy Stoljar SC. 40 Features 8th Floor Selborne Chambers 8/174 Phillip Street Te short, sad life of Derek Bentley Sydney 2000 DX 395 Sydney Innocence and life without parole in Louisiana Contributions may be subject to editing prior to 51 Appointments publication, at the discretion of the editor. Her Honour Judge Nicole Noman SC Cover: Death row, Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola, Louisiana.
    [Show full text]
  • The Goals and Objectives of Law Schools in Their Primary Role of Educating Students
    International Association of Law Schools Conference The Role of Law Schools and Law School Leadership in a Changing World Australian National University Canberra, Australia May 26 – 27, 2009 ANU College of Law Funded Conference On-Site Expenses Association of American Law Schools Funded Developing Country Participation and Staff Support to IALS Zeit-Stiftung Ebelin und Gerd Bucerius and The Wang Family Foundation Funded Developing Country Participation The Role of Law Schools and Law School Leadership in a Changing World Welcome It is an honour and a pleasure to welcome you, in my capacity as Chair of the Planning Committee, to this challenging IALS conference on 'The Role of Law Schools and Law School Leadership in a Changing World' — a conference that will ask the big questions about why we are here: do we have broader purposes than merely producing technically competent lawyers, what are those purposes, and how can we best achieve them? The three previous IALS conferences (Suzhou 2007, Hamburg 2008 and Montreal 2008) have been immensely valuable in sensitising us to difference, opening our minds, and enabling us to learn from each other. That process will undoubtedly continue. But I wonder if in this conference — Canberra 2009 — we might push a little further and explore not only the differences that illuminate but also the commonalities that unite. Are there any universals that define our collective mission as law schools around the world in the 21st century? The program has been put together by a wonderfully diverse planning committee,
    [Show full text]
  • 2641 Macquarie University Law School 40
    2641 MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL 40TH ANNIVERSARY SYDNEY, 19 OCTOBER 2012 A.R. BLACKSHIELD AND REALISM IN AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW The Hon. Michael Kirby AC, CMG MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL 40TH ANNIVERSARY SYDNEY, 19 OCTOBER 2012 A.R. BLACKSHIELD AND REALISM IN AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW* THE HON MICHAEL KIRBY AC CMG** IN THE BEGINNING As befits a pupil, I honour a teacher who helped to ready me for a life in the law. He helped me to see law, especially public and constitutional law, in its governmental and political context. He was one of the early professors of law at the Macquarie University Law School. But before that, in his first years of undergraduate teaching at the University of Sydney Law School, he taught a class that included Murray Gleeson, David Hodgson, Graham Hill, Jane Matthews, Brian Tamberlin, me and others. In Professor Blackshield’s hands were placed two future Justices of the High Court of Australia, judges of the New South Wales Court of Appeal and of the Federal Court and other Federal and State courts, two future professors of law, leading businessmen, politicians and legal practitioners.1 Great is the responsibility of the teachers who introduce untutored law students to the concepts of law that will dominate their lives, so important for their society. Great is the debt that we, the students owe to our teachers, including Tony Blackshield. * Inaugural Tony Blackshield Lecture, 2012. ** Justice of the High Court of Australia (1996-2009); President of the New South Wales Court of Appeal (1984-1996); Judge of the Federal Court of Australia (1983-84); Chairman of the Australian Law Reform Commission (1975-84).
    [Show full text]
  • CONNECTIONS in NATIVE TITLE: Genealogies, Kinship and Groups
    CONNECTIONS IN NATIVE TITLE: Genealogies, Kinship and Groups Edited by J.D. Finlayson, B. Rigsby and H.J. Bek Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research The Australian National University, Canberra Research Monograph No. 13 1999 First published in Australia 1999. © Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian National University. This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealings for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Inquiries should be directed to the publisher, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia. National Library of Australia. Cataloguing-in-publication entry. Connections in Native Title: genealogies, kinship and groups. Bibliography. ISSN 1036-6962 ISBN 07315 5100 1 1. Aborigines, Australian - Land tenure. 2. Native title. 3. Aborigines, Australian - Genealogy. 4. Aborigines, Australian - Kinship. I. Finlayson, Julie. II. Rigsby, B. (Bruce). III. Bek, H.J. (Hilary Jane). IV. Australian National University. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research. (Series : Research monograph (Australian National University. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research) ; no. 13). 306.320899915 Printed by Instant Colour Press, Belconnen, ACT. Contents Acknowledgments v Introduction 1 1. The system as it was straining to become: fluidity, stability, and Aboriginal country groups 13 Peter Sutton 2. Generation and gender differences in genealogical knowledge: the central role of women in mapping connection to country 59 Fiona Powell 3. Lumpers, splitters and the middle range: groups, local and otherwise, in the mid-Murray region 73 Rod Hagen 4. Sustaining memories: the status of oral and written evidence in native title claims 85 Julie Finlayson 5.
    [Show full text]
  • CALENDAR Summary Volume
    THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES • SYDNEY • AUSTRALIA CALENDAR Summary Volume 2005 IMPORTANT The programs, plans, courses and the arrangements for delivery of programs, plans and courses (including specified academic staff) as set out in this publication are indicative only. The University may discontinue or vary arrangements, programs, plans and courses at any time without notice and at its discretion. While the University will try to avoid or minimise any inconvenience, changes may also be made to programs, plans, courses, staff and procedures after enrolment. The University may set limits on the number of students in a course. Students or prospective students may obtain the most recent information from the School or Faculty if required. © The University of New South Wales This document is available in large print, on audiotape, on disk or in Braille for people with print handicap. Please contact Equity & Diversity Unit on (02) 9385 4734 or [email protected] The address of the University of New South Wales is: The University of New South Wales UNSW SYDNEY 2052 AUSTRALIA Telephone: (02) 9385 1000 Facsimile: (02) 9385 2000 Email: [email protected] http://www.unsw.edu.au Edited by UNSW Student Services. Designed, published and printed by Publishing & Printing Services, The University of New South Wales. CRICOS Provider Code No. 00098G ISSN 1325-667X Arms of THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Granted by the College of Heralds, London, 3 March 1952 In 1994 the University title was added to the Arms to create the new University Symbol shown. Heraldic Description of the Arms Argent on a Cross Gules a Lion passant guardant between four Mullets of eight points Or a Chief Sable charged with an open Book proper thereon the word SCIENTIA in letters also Sable.
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 Social Justice Report
    Social Justice Report 1998 © 1999 Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior permission from the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner, Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. Inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be directed to the Manager, Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 1042. ISSN 1321-11 Contents Foreword 1 Introduction: A Handful of Soil 2 Chapter 1: The Aftermarth for Indigenous People 13 Chapter 2: Non-Indigenous Community Response 27 Chapter 3: Church Responses 48 Chapter 4: Government Responses to the Recommendations of Bringing Them Home 53 Appendix 1: Letters to the Editor 83 Appendix 2: Selected Inventory of Apologies and National Sorry Day Events 89 Appendix 3: Text of Sorry Day Statement 92 Appendix 4: Summary of Governments’ Responses to Recommendations 94 Foreword This report presents various responses to Bringing Them Home, the Report of the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from their Families. This is not done to re-open the substance of the Inquiry, its findings or the basis of its recommendations. The objective is to record the diverse range of responses and the perspectives they illustrate. The publication of Bringing Them Home had a marked impact on the Australian community. The ensuing public debate was sustained and intense. It stimulated the expression of views reflecting contemporary attitudes and values which directly and indirectly affect the circumstances of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.
    [Show full text]