The Biodiversity Finance Policy and Institutional Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Biodiversity Finance Policy and Institutional Review THE BIODIVERSITY FINANCE POLICY AND INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW The Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) – Georgia THE BIODIVERSITY FINANCE POLICY AND INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW The Biodiversity Finance Initiative2016 (BIOFIN) – Georgia 2016 THE BIODIVERSITY FINANCE POLICY AND INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW The Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) – Georgia 2016 THE BIODIVERSITY FINANCE POLICY AND INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW The Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) – Georgia Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia and United Nations Development Programme, 2016. Tbilisi, Georgia. Biodiversity Finance Initiative – Georgia: The Biodiversity Finance Policy and Institutional Review. Final Report written by Tornike Phulariani, Levan Inashvili, Dimitri Papashvili and Levan Gogoberishvili. (80 Pages). Available from: http://www.ge.undp.org/content/georgia/en/home/projects/biodiversity-finance-initiative--biofinhtml https://www.biodiversityfinance.net/georgia BIOFIN Georgia Project Manager: Tornike Phulariani UNDP Environment & Energy Team Leader: Nino Antadze Senior Technical Advisor: David Meyers Biofin Global Manager: Onno van den Heuvel Disclaimer: The report was prepared and published with the support of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of UNDP. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project relied on inputs from many people working in biodiversity conservation and other sectors. We would like to acknowledge the following valuable contributions: Name Organization Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia – Karlo Amirgulashvili The Department of Biodiversity and Forest Policy Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia – Nona Khelaia The Department of Biodiversity and Forest Policy Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia – Teona Karchava The Department of Biodiversity and Forest Policy Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia – Tamar Sharashidze Environmental Impact Permits Department Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia – Maia Beradze Environmental Impact Permits Department Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia – Alexandre Papunashvili Environmental Impact Permits Department Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia – Nino Chikovani Department of Integrated Management, Land and Mineral Resources Division Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia – Tea Levidze Environmental Policy and International Relations Department, Projects Coordination Division Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia – Natia Iordanishvili National Forestry Agency Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia – Merab Machavariani National Forestry Agency Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia – Tamar Kvantaliani Agency of Protected Areas Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia – Toma Dekanoidze Agency of Protected Areas Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia – Nelly Korkotadze Department of Environmental Supervision Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia – Maia Chkhobadze Department of Environmental Supervision Name Organization Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia – Ia Papiashvili Environmental Information and Education Centre Ekaterine Guntsadze Ministry of Finance – Budget Department Natia Gulua Ministry of Finance – Budget Department Zurab Gurielidze Tbilisi Zoo Kakha Artsivadze NACRES – Centre for Biodiversity Conservation & Research Irakli Shavgulidze NACRES – Centre for Biodiversity Conservation & Research Natia Kobakhidze GIZ – Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit Mariam Urdia GIZ – Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit Paata Shanshiashvili USDoI – U.S. Department of the Interior Tamar Pataridze CNF – Caucasus Nature Fund Tea Barbakadze CNF – Caucasus Nature Fund George (Geof) Giacomini CNF – Caucasus Nature Fund Mariam Jorjadze The Biological Farming Association – Elkana Rezo Getiashvili CENN – Caucasus Environmental NGO Network Nugzar Zazanashvili WWF – World Wide Fund for Nature Kety Tsereteli Rec Caucasus – The Regional Environmental Centre for the Caucasus Sophiko Akhobadze Rec Caucasus – The Regional Environmental Centre for the Caucasus Irakli Macharashvili Green Alternative Servi Nabuurs TJS – Transboundary Joint Secretariat Lali Tevzadze TJS – Transboundary Joint Secretariat Ana Rukhadze Independent Expert Marika Kavtarishvili Independent Expert Nino Sulkhanishvili Ecovision Nino Chkhobadze Greens Movement – Friends of the Earth Natia Natsvlishvili UNDP – Assistant Resident Representative Nestan Khuntsaria UNDP – Environment & Energy Portfolio Programme Associate Lia Tergiashvili UNDP – BIOFIN Project Administrative/Financial Assistant EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Policy and Institutional Review forms a reference point understanding regarding the linkages between priorities for the whole BIOFIN process. The document establishes identified by National Biodiversity Strategy and Action a baseline of the national policy and institutional context Plan (NBSAP) and other policy documents in environment in which the BIOFIN project is expected to expand sector as well as other economic sectors, having different biodiversity finance in Georgia. levels of impact and/or dependency on biodiversity. With regard to biodiversity framework, all the principal NBSAP highlights importance of mainstreaming of development strategies, national laws, and other national biodiversity issues into the different sectors. Moreover, policy documents have been considered. the number of NBSAP actions should be implemented in cooperation with different sectoral ministries and other The need for changes in the policy and regulatory governmental bodies. Although majority of this actions framework dealing with the environment and are not reflected in relevant sectoral strategies. biodiversity protection is clearly outlined in the principal national strategies. “The environmental legal framework In 2012, a second National Environmental Action will be revised and upgraded in such areas as: waste Programme (NEAP-2) for the period 2012–2016 was management, water resource management, atmospheric adopted. Timeframes for achieving a large range of air protection, forest management, reduction of natural specific measures are identified as well as the broad cost and anthropogenic hazards, nuclear and radiation safety, categories (low, medium and high), potential financing protection of biodiversity, sustainable management sources (central and local self-government budgets, IFIs, of natural resources, issuance of permits and licenses, foreign donors) and achievement indicators. environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment” is outlined in the 2015 state Basic Dimensions and Directions (BDD) document is program “For Strong, Democratic, United Georgia”. the key document outlining the financing perspectives. The 2014–2017 BDD sets protection of the environment The National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (2014− and rational use of natural resources among established 2020) (adopted in May 2014), a document mandated by priorities and commits to serve the goal of gradually the CBD, formulates a wide-ranging policy and outlines attaining environmental standards adhered to in the EU the respective national priorities to transform Georgia space or established by international treaties. into the country, where by the year 2030 “it will be a country with population living in harmony with nature, The document containing Basic Dimensions and biodiversity will be commonly valued, biological resources Directions of the country’s development is the master – conserved and wisely used. This will provide natural plan of the country’s development, which includes the continuity of ecosystem processes, healthy environment information on medium-term macroeconomic and fiscal and benefits essential for all people“. forecast, as well as information on main issue-areas of the development of the central, autonomous and local In order to identify the entry-points for future interventions self-government authorities of Georgia. under BIOFIN process, it is important to have a clear The Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources in Georgia. The development of the sector should be Protection of Georgia (MENRP) is the principal body of understood from the perspective of ecosystem services, the executive authority in the biodiversity protection on which the sector depends and which are impacted sphere. Different entities of public law (LEPLs) and sub- by it. According to Ministry of Energy and Natural units under the MENRP play vital roles in the context of Resources of Georgia, about 100 new HPP’s are either biodiversity management. The Agency of Protected Areas under construction or going through feasibility study (APA) is responsible for establishment/management by different investors and respective Memorandums of PAs nationwide, monitoring and scientific research, of Understanding have been signed. The total installed processing, storing and distributing data about protected capacity of the new HPP projects is about 3.8 thousand areas. The forest protection function is fulfilled by MW. Although no active public debates take place
Recommended publications
  • USAID Zrda to Launch Small Grants Program in the Akhmeta Municipality
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 5, 2018 For additional information: Keti Rekhviashvili, Communications Manager Phone: 032 222 74 95 Email: [email protected] USAID Zrda to Launch Small Grants Program in the Akhmeta Municipality Akhmeta, Kakheti region - On February 5, 2018, USAID/Georgia Economic Growth Office Director Veronica Lee joined Akhmeta Municipality Head Ioseb Karumashvili, to meet with local communities and launch a Small Grants Program, initiated by USAID’s Zrda Activity. The Small Grants program is designed for nine target communities of the Akhmeta municipality (city Akhmeta, Kvemo Alvani, Zemo Alvani, Matani, Sakobiano, Duisi, Jokolo, Khalatsani and Omalo) to support business development through small grants assistance to micro and small enterprises. Within the Program, Zrda plans to award up to 60 grants for agriculture and tourism development activities in target communities. At least 35% of total project value is requested as a leverage from an entrepreneur. The Small Grants Program will build upon and diversify Zrda’s ongoing activities in the communities of the Akhmeta municipality. Through its agriculture interventions, Zrda established five 100-sq. m. greenhouse demonstration plots for seedling- and vegetable production, and today local farmers have an access to agriculture development programs offered by the government and international organizations. In tourism sector, Zrda supported guesthouse owners to boost their incomes through improving their marketing skills and helping them join well-known, international
    [Show full text]
  • RBMP SEA Report ENG FINAL
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) OF THE DRAFTALAZANI-IORI RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN SEA Report November 2020 2 This SEA report was prepared by the national SEA team established for the pilot project “The Application of a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) for the Draft Alazani-Iori River Basin Management Plan” (hereinafter also the SEA pilot project): Ms. Elina Bakradze (water and soil quality aspects), Ms. Anna Rukhadze (biodiversity, habitats and protected areas), Ms. Lela Serebryakova (health related aspects), Mr. Giorgi Guliashvili (hydrology and natural hazards), Mr. Davit Darsavelidze (socio-economic aspects), Mr. Irakli Kobulia (cultural heritage aspects and GIS) and the UNECE national consultant Ms. Irma Melikishvili (the team leader also covering climate change aspects), under the guidance and supervision of the UNECE international consultant Mr. Martin Smutny. Maps: The thematic maps presented in the SEA Report are produced by Mr. Irakli Kobulia on the basis of the GIS database provided by the EUWI + programme. The SEA Report also includes maps developed in the framework of the EUWI + programme (under result 2) by the REC Caucasus, subcontractor of the EUWI+ programme. The SEA pilot project was carried out under the supervision of Mr. Alisher Mamadzhanov, the EUWI+ programme leader from UNECE with the support provided by Ms. Christine Kitzler and Mr. Alexander Belokurov, UNECE and Ms. Eliso Barnovi, the EUWI+ Country Representative
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGIAN TOURISM in FIGURES STRUCTURE & INDUSTRY DATA Summary
    2016 GEORGIAN TOURISM IN FIGURES STRUCTURE & INDUSTRY DATA Summary This yearbook provides statistical information on the number of rooms showed that accommodation the Georgian tourism sector and the activities of the with five or fewer rooms was the largest category Georgian National Tourism Administration (GNTA) in with 680 such units (representing 39% of the total). 2016. It covers statistical data, trends, the activities undertaken by the GNTA to promote tourism and the standing of Georgia on international tourism indices. Georgia has been successful in international relations as well. In 2016, agreements of cooperation in In 2010, the GNTA was established as a Legal En- the field of tourism were signed with China, Belarus tity of Public Law under the ministry of Economy and and Qatar. Sustainable Development. The administration plays an essential role in the economic development of the tourism industry of Georgia. Its goals are to ensure The outlook for the tourism industry is highly the development of sustainable tourism through optimistic. It is forecast that the sector will create positioning Georgia as a unique travel destination more jobs and generate more income in the years to on the international tourist map, to improve visitors’ come. The number of arrivals to Georgia is expected experiences, maximize their expenditures to to keep increasing thanks to various steps taken by significantly contribute to the national econo- both the government, in general, and the GNTA, in my, and to effectively cooperate with strategic particular. The recently created Georgian Tourism partners . Strategy 2025 presents a ten-year plan which should play a key role in accomplishing this aim successfully.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection 2018
    STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2018 NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection 2018 Statistical Publication TBILISI 2019 1 STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2018 Editors: Gogita Todradze Lia Dzebisauri Person responsible for the publication: Irakli Tsikhelashvili Persons worked on the publication: Tamar Tarashvili Nino Zurabishvili Notation keys: ... Data are not available - Magnitude nil Negligible 0.0 magnitude The discrepancy between the totals and the sum in some cases can be explained by using rounded data The data in this publication do not cover uccupied territories of Georgia (Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali region) © National Statistic Office of Georgia 30, Tsotne Dadiani Str., 0180, Tbilisi, Georgia Phone/Fax: (+995 32) 2 36 72 10 (500) E-mail: [email protected] Web-page: www.geostat.ge 2 STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2018 Foreword Statistical publication "Natural Resources and Environmental Protection of Georgia" presents information on the use of land, forest and water resources, ambient air protection, protected areas, natural disasters and environ- mental violations. It also includes methodological explanations and information from different reference and scien- tific sources. The preparation of this publication is based on the growing interest of a wide range of users, however, the in- formation collected in it, presents the best way of policy planning at local or global levels. In addition, the need to produce environmental indicators is related to the most important issues of global policy, such as climate change and environmental security. The data in the publication reflects the natural resources of Georgia and developed trends of environmental activities in 2000-2018. Substantive comments and suggestions on the format and content of the publication will be highly appreciated by the group of authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot Integrated Regional Development Programme for Guria, Imereti, Kakheti and Racha Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti 2020-2022 2019
    Pilot Integrated Regional Development Programme for Guria, Imereti, Kakheti and Racha Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti 2020-2022 2019 1 Table of Contents List of maps and figures......................................................................................................................3 List of tables ......................................................................................................................................3 List of Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................4 Chapter I. Introduction – background and justification. Geographical Coverage of the Programme .....6 1.1. General background ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. Selection of the regions ..................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter II. Socio-economic situation and development trends in the targeted regions .........................9 Chapter ...........................................................................................................................................24 III. Summary of territorial development needs and potentials to be addressed in targeted regions .... 24 Chapter IV. Objectives and priorities of the Programme ................................................................... 27 4.1. Programming context for setting up PIRDP’s objectives and priorities ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment
    REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA National Urban Assessment ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA NATIONAL URBAN ASSESSMENT ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2016 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2016. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9257-352-2 (Print), 978-92-9257-353-9 (e-ISBN) Publication Stock No. RPT168254 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Realizing the urban potential in Georgia—National urban assessment. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2016. 1. Urban development.2. Georgia.3. National urban assessment, strategy, and road maps. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. This publication was finalized in November 2015 and statistical data used was from the National Statistics Office of Georgia as available at the time on http://www.geostat.ge The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • International Protected Areas 2020
    International protected areas 2020 Managing local impacts to the environment March 2021 a Major operating sites within 20km of an international protected area in 2020 Type of protected area Inside the boundary Adjacent (within 1km) Near (1km – 5km) Close (5km – 20km) World Heritage Site 0 1 2 2 Ramsar site 0 2 1 3 IUCN Category I-II 1 2 4 6 Natura 2000 sites 3 2 5 7 Number of major operationsb 4 4 9 11 a Details on major operations inside or adjacent (within 1km) to international protected areas or near (within 5km) of a world heritage site are provided in the table below. Details on other facilities near (within 5km) and close (within 20km) are available upon request. In 2020, 14 major operating sites were within 20km of an international protected area. b A major operating site may exist within or near more than one type of protected area. This row gives the total number of major operating sites at each level of proximity against all four protected area types in the table. 2 International protected areas Major operational sites which have activities inside or adjacent (within 1km) to international protected areas and near (within 5km) of World Heritage sites Major operating Protected area Location Name Countries site BTC, SCP and World Heritage site Adjacent & In Azerbaijan (AZ), the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) oil and South Caucasus (SCP) Azerbaijan & WREP pipelines Near gas pipelines cross the edge of the buffer zone (approximately 900 metres) of Georgia the Gobustan State Reserve of History and Art - a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
    [Show full text]
  • Arrangement of Lighting and Touristic Infrastructure in Villages Birkiani and Dzibakhevi, on Akhmeta-Batsara Central Road
    SFG3426 V17 Public Disclosure Authorized Arrangement of lighting and touristic infrastructure in villages Birkiani and Dzibakhevi, on Akhmeta-Batsara central road Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental and Social Screening Report Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized June 2017 Sub-Project Description Villages Birkani and Dzibakhevi are located in the Pankisi gorge and are the last villages of the gorge, from where the Batsara Nature Reserve begins. Its central street is the Akhmeta-Batsara road section, which is used by local residents as well as visitors of Batsara-Babaneuri protected areas. The above mentioned road is the only access motorway to the entrance of Batsari reserve and its infrastructure arrangement such as street lighting, tourist information boards, proper waste management is an important step to increase the tourists flow. Outdoor lighting poles are depreciated and require replacement. As a result of tourist infrastructure development, the Pankisi gorge has the potential to become a more attractive touristic place, since in addition to protected areas, the Pankisi gorge borders the Tusheti national park, Ilto managed reserve, Khevsureti, Pshavi. The Sub-Project (SP) envisages the arrangement of central street lighting in the villages Birkani and Dzibakhevi (Pankisi gorge) of the Akhmeta municipality, installation of tourist indicator boards and waste bins on the same street. Within the SP, 2,4 km outdoor lighting will be arranged with new metal poles and 60 pieces of lights will be installed. At the same time, 1,1 m³ sized 14 modern receptacles will be installed on the main road together with two indicator boards with directions of tourist routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1 - List of Schools
    Annex 1 - list of schools School Verified information by # building School name Region District ESIDA code 1 2090 City Rustavi №21 public school Kvemo Kartli Rustavi Total rehabilitation 2 1819 City Rustavi №2 public school named after Shota Rustaveli Kvemo Kartli Rustavi Total rehabilitation 3 810 City Rustavi №3 public school Kvemo Kartli Rustavi Total rehabilitation 4 3008 Village Sadakhlo №1 public school in Marneuli Municipality Kvemo Kartli Marneuli Total rehabilitation 5 317 City Telavi №2 public school Kakhetui Telavi Total rehabilitation 6 282 Village Duisi public school in Akhmeta Municipality Kakhetui Akhmeta Total rehabilitation Expected MDF- Number Number Ratio to number MCC reinforce MDF- of of Saturatio Highmou WB Long Building address Sector (GEO, Rus, Aze, Arm) common for next FCI area Controle ment / construct NEFCO CEB teachers students n% EMIS ntain List area 5 years d Schools complete ion EMIS EMIS EMIS rehabilita №3, Meskhishvili II turn, Rustavi Georgian 76 1437 3,808921 0,38 5473,42 No Yes №6, Nikoladze str., Rustavi Georgian 56 919 2,611121 0,35 2399,62 No Yes Yes №17, Constritution str., Rustavi Georgian, Russian 38 534 4,290094 0,35 2290,91 No Yes Village Sadakhlo Azerbaijani 65 613 5,104894 0,37 3129,3 No Yes Georgian 33 386 6,059326 0,37 2338,9 No Yes Village Duisi Georgian, Russian 40 548 3,220529 0,33 1764,85 Yes Yes ESIDA students Total Including students ESIDA MCC-full Internall socially students including including Including including including socially Students full KFW EE with Ethnical number older
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and Society: Georgia
    Gender and Society: Georgia Tbilisi 2008 The Report was prepared and published within the framework of the UNDP project - “Gender and Politics” The Report was prepared by the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) The author: Nana Sumbadze For additional information refer to the office of the UNDP project “Gender and Politics” at the following address: Administrative building of the Parliament of Georgia, 8 Rustaveli avenue, room 034, Tbilisi; tel./fax (99532) 923662; www.genderandpolitics.ge and the office of the IPS, Chavchavadze avenue, 10; Tbilisi 0179; tel./fax (99532) 220060; e-mail: [email protected] The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the United Nations or UNDP Editing: Sandeep Chakraborty Book design: Gio Sumbadze Copyright © UNDP 2008 All rights reserved Contents Acknowledgements 4 List of abbreviations 5 Preface 6 Chapter 1: Study design 9 Chapter 2: Equality 14 Gender in public realm Chapter 3: Participation in public life 30 Chapter 4: Employment 62 Gender in private realm Chapter 5: Gender in family life 78 Chapter 6: Human and social capital 98 Chapter 7: Steps forward 122 Bibliography 130 Annex I. Photo Voice 136 Annex II. Attitudes of ethnic minorities towards equality 152 Annex III. List of entries on Georgian women in Soviet encyclopaedia 153 Annex IV. List of organizations working on gender issues 162 Annex V. List of interviewed persons 173 Annex VI. List of focus groups 175 Acknowledgements from the Author The author would like to express her sincere gratitude to the staff of UNDP project “Gender and Politics” for their continuous support, and to Gender Equality Advisory Council for their valuable recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • E26160v20box37000eia0mtskh
    E2616 v2 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Mtskheta Sewerage System Rehabilitation Sub-Project ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Public Disclosure Authorized Regional Municipal Infrastructure Development Project- Additional Financing (RMIDP -AF) Co-financed by World Bank and Sweden International Development Agency (SIDA) Public Disclosure Authorized Tbilisi. Georgia June, 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................7 2. Georgian Legislation on the Environmental Protection, World Bank Environmental Protective Procedures and Project screening ....................................................................................7 2.1. Georgian Legislation and Policy on the Environmental Protection ..................................... 7 2.2 World Bank Policy .............................................................................................................. 10 2.3 Result of the project screening ............................................................................................ 11 3. Project Description ........................................................................................................................11 3.1 Technological Scheme for the Operation of Purifying Structure ....................................... 13
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences Diagnostic Analysis Of
    Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 8(8) July 2014, Pages: 31-41 AENSI Journals Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences ISSN:1995-0772 EISSN: 1998-1090 Journal home page: www.aensiweb.com/ANAS Diagnostic Analysis of National Parks in Georgia in context of Ecotourism 1Tamari Poladashvili, Dr., 2António Cardoso, Ph.D., 3Álvaro Cairrão, Ph.D. 1Master Student in Business Sciences University Fernando Pessoa Porto-Portugal 2Professor at University Fernando Pessoa Coordinator of Bacharelor and Master Degree’s in Business Sciences Porto-Portugal 3Professor atUniversity de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro School of Human and Social Sciences Vila Real-Portugal ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Today it is already acknowledged that tourism can be successfully used to increase Received 2 April 2014 economic development in local and national level. According to the World Wildlife Received in revised form Fund (1995), ecotourism takes 15 % from all tourism worldwide, so is not a small part 13 May 2014 of nature tourism. Thus, world is facing several problems, for instance: a global crisis Accepted 28 May 2014 due to global warming and other environmental issues, that makes the questions that Available online 27 June 2014 society has to answer. As far environmental issues are directly linked to green marketingthe given paper argues the importance of ecotourism in the context of green Keywords: marketing. After a proper introduction of theoretical framework, the paperpresents the Ecotourism, National Parks, Green current situation of protected areas, tourism activities, target groups, facilities and Marketing, Georgia. capacities. The research paper provides statistical information of tourism demand in protected areas, its use and abuse.
    [Show full text]