Georgia on My Mind …
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Guide of Georgia Facts About Georgia
GUIDE OF GEORGIA Cycles of Higher Education Higher Education system of Georgia consists of three cycles: First Cycle-Bachelor’s Degree (240 credits); Second Cycle-Master’s Degree (120 credits); Third Cycle-Doctor’s Degree (180 credits) Higher Education Institutions Georgia is a popular destination for students from around the world, wishing to gain a top-quality education. Each year more and more students take courses in Georgia and fill the contingent of international students to already significant contingent in the whole country. The following are the higher education institutions in Georgia: College – higher education institution implementing professional higher educational programs or/and only the first cycle programs –Bachelor programs; Educational University-higher education institution implementing higher educational program/programs (except for doctoral programs). It is required to provide the second Cycle-Master educational program/programs; University –higher education institution implementing educational programs of all the three cycles of the highest academic education. Quality Assurance External quality assurance in Georgia lies through accreditation process. Accreditation is conducted by National Education Accreditation Centre www.nea.ge The state recognizes the qualification documents issued only by an accredited educational institution or equalized to it. FACTS ABOUT GEORGIA Local name: "Sakartvelo" / Georgia Capital city: Tbilisi Area: 69,700 sq. km Location: It lies between the Black and Caspian Seas, on the south of the Caucasus, bordered by Russia in the north; Armenia, Turkey in the south, Azerbaijan – in the south-east. Population: 4,7 million Native language: Georgian Currency: Lari (Gel) Calling code: +995; the area code of Tbilisi is 322 Area: 69,700 sq. -
Georgia RISK & COMPLIANCE REPORT DATE: March 2018
Georgia RISK & COMPLIANCE REPORT DATE: March 2018 KNOWYOURCOUNTRY.COM Executive Summary - Georgia Sanctions: None FAFT list of AML No Deficient Countries US Dept of State Money Laundering Assessment Higher Risk Areas: Not on EU White list equivalent jurisdictions Failed States Index (Political Issues)(Average Score) Non - Compliance with FATF 40 + 9 Recommendations Medium Risk Areas: Corruption Index (Transparency International & W.G.I.) World Governance Indicators (Average Score) Major Investment Areas: Agriculture - products: citrus, grapes, tea, hazelnuts, vegetables; livestock Industries: steel, machine tools, electrical appliances, mining (manganese, copper, and gold), chemicals, wood products, wine Exports - commodities: vehicles, ferro-alloys, fertilizers, nuts, scrap metal, gold, copper ores Exports - partners: Azerbaijan 13.8%, US 8.5%, Germany 8.3%, Bulgaria 7.4%, Kazakhstan 7%, Turkey 6.4%, Ukraine 6.3%, Lebanon 5.7%, Canada 4.2% (2012) Imports - commodities: fuels, vehicles, machinery and parts, grain and other foods, pharmaceuticals Imports - partners: Turkey 13.9%, China 8.2%, Ukraine 8.2%, Russia 7.4%, Azerbaijan 7.1%, US 6%, Germany 5.6%, Bulgaria 4% (2012) 1 Investment Restrictions: Georgia is open to foreign investment, and the Georgia National Investment Agency is implementing an aggressive marketing campaign to encourage more foreign investors to come to Georgia. Exceptions to national treatment may be made by Georgia for investments in maritime fisheries; air and maritime transport and related activities; ownership of broadcast, common carrier, or aeronautical radio stations; communications satellites Foreign individuals and companies are restricted from holding agricultural land in Georgia. However, according to the US Department of State 2012, there is a loophole in which agricultural land can be purchased by non-nationals and then transferred under the name of a Georgian entity; thus, land can be up to 100% foreign-owned. -
Bagrati Cathedral and Gelati Monastery
Date received by the World Heritage Centre 29 January 2014 Bagrati Cathedral and Gelati Monastery Background The currently serial property of Bagrati Cathedral and (Republic of Georgia) Gelati Monastery was inscribed on the World Heritage No 710bis List in 1994 on the basis of criterion (iv). It was inscribed on the World Heritage List in Danger in 2010. At its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), the World Official name as proposed by the State Party Heritage Committee, in decision 37 COM 7A.32: Gelati Monastery 4. Expresses its deep regret that despite previous Location decisions the re-building of Bagrati Cathedral has been Tkibuli district completed and considers that the Bagrati Cathedral has Republic of Georgia been altered to such an extent that its authenticity has been irreversibly compromised and that it no longer contributes to the justification for the criterion for which the property was Brief description inscribed; Gelati Monastery is currently one part of the serial property of Bagrati Cathedral and Gelati Monastery. This 5. Requests the State Party to submit, by 1 February 2014, major boundary modification is for the reduction of the a request for a major boundary modification for the property property to enclose only Gelati monastery and its to allow Gelati Monastery to justify the criterion on its own; monastic precinct. The State Party submitted a major boundary nomination On the lower southern slopes of the mountains of the on 31st January 2014 and this was assessed by Northern Caucasus, Gelati monastery belongs to the ICOMOS. At its 39th session (Bonn, 2015), the World 'golden age' of medieval Georgia, a period of political Heritage Committee, in decision 39 COM 8B.35, referred strength and economic growth between the reigns of the major boundary modification of Bagrati Cathedral King David IV 'the Builder' (1089-1125) and Queen and Gelati Monastery”, Georgia, back to the State Party Tamar (1184-1213). -
Interpretations of the Socio-Economic Structure of the Urartian Kingdom
UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL SCHOOL OF HISTORIES, LANGUAGES AND CULTURES (ARCHAEOLOGY, CLASSICS AND EGYPTOLOGY) INTERPRETATIONS OF THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF THE URARTIAN KINGDOM By ALİ ÇİFÇİ Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2014 Liverpool i To my parents Cennet ÇİFÇİ and Ali ÇİFÇİ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people have helped me to complete this research and in particular I would like to thank to my supervisors, Alan M. Greaves and Christopher Tuplin, both of whom have provided me with ideas and advice on numerous occasions. Also I would like to thank to my examiners Bruce Routledge and Claudia Glatz for their comments and suggestions. I would also like to thank Paul Zimansky for reading the first drafts of my thesis and for his subsequent suggestions and advice as to how it could be improved. I must also express my gratitude to Kemalettin Köroğlu, who has been generous with his help and advice and Altan Çilingiroğlu for allowing me to participate in the Ayanis excavation and for scholarly conversations. Further thanks are due to Erkan Konyar, who generously provided unpublished information and to the Van Kalesi Höyüğü excavation team for their support. Mirjo Salvini, Mehmet Karaosmanoğlu and Stephan Kroll have also offered help and advice on various aspects of Urartian archaeology and I am also grateful to Magnus Widell for his help with cuneiform inscriptions. In addition, I would like to thank Emel Oybak Dönmez, Atilla Batmaz, Yervand Greakyan and Mehmet Ali Yılmaz for sending me literature that was helpful to my research. -
Gender and Society: Georgia
Gender and Society: Georgia Tbilisi 2008 The Report was prepared and published within the framework of the UNDP project - “Gender and Politics” The Report was prepared by the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) The author: Nana Sumbadze For additional information refer to the office of the UNDP project “Gender and Politics” at the following address: Administrative building of the Parliament of Georgia, 8 Rustaveli avenue, room 034, Tbilisi; tel./fax (99532) 923662; www.genderandpolitics.ge and the office of the IPS, Chavchavadze avenue, 10; Tbilisi 0179; tel./fax (99532) 220060; e-mail: [email protected] The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the United Nations or UNDP Editing: Sandeep Chakraborty Book design: Gio Sumbadze Copyright © UNDP 2008 All rights reserved Contents Acknowledgements 4 List of abbreviations 5 Preface 6 Chapter 1: Study design 9 Chapter 2: Equality 14 Gender in public realm Chapter 3: Participation in public life 30 Chapter 4: Employment 62 Gender in private realm Chapter 5: Gender in family life 78 Chapter 6: Human and social capital 98 Chapter 7: Steps forward 122 Bibliography 130 Annex I. Photo Voice 136 Annex II. Attitudes of ethnic minorities towards equality 152 Annex III. List of entries on Georgian women in Soviet encyclopaedia 153 Annex IV. List of organizations working on gender issues 162 Annex V. List of interviewed persons 173 Annex VI. List of focus groups 175 Acknowledgements from the Author The author would like to express her sincere gratitude to the staff of UNDP project “Gender and Politics” for their continuous support, and to Gender Equality Advisory Council for their valuable recommendations. -
THE PAPER | India-Georgia Relationship: a Window of Opportunity
www.ssoar.info India-Georgia Relationship: A Window of Opportunity Sarma, Hriday; Khutsishvili, Levan Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Sarma, H., & Khutsishvili, L. (2017). India-Georgia Relationship: A Window of Opportunity. IndraStra Global, 11, 1-5. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-54875-7 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de THE PAPER | India-Georgia Relationship: A Window of Opportunity indrastra.com/2017/11/PAPER-India-Georgia-Relationship-Window-Opportunity-003-11-2017-0025.html By Hriday Ch. Sarma and Levan Khutsishvili Image Attribute: Georgian and Indian Flags / Source: PIA.ge Abstract: India and Georgia, representing two ancient surviving civilizations in the world, are not located far away from within Asia. The two nations had deep linkages in the past; however, they mostly remained disconnected over the past few centuries for various reasons. In recent years, they are experiencing a steady rise in people-to-people engagement, especially in trade. Considering the changing global geopolitical realities and increasing avenues of Europe-Asia trade, India urgently needs to revive and rebuild its historic ties with Georgia to meet its national interests in the 21st century. Georgia could be a ‘Gateway to Europe’ for India. -
Exploration of Georgia 6Days €
EXPLORATION OF GEORGIA 6 DAYS Small group tour to Georgia BOOK 6 MONTHS IN ADVANCE SAVE 10% € 621 Starts from Tbilisi every second sunday The exploration route is open for all seasons. Choose the date and join the group in Tbilisi. The tour is designed to run four seasons a year. Explore the cultural heritage of Georgia, follow the Great Silk Road and discover the country’s culture and fascinating folklore. MAIN HIGHLIGHTS & SITES: Tbilisi CITY IMERETI REgion • Holy Trinity Cathedral • Kutaisi City • Georgian National Museum • Bagrati Cathedral 11th c • Rustaveli Avenue • Gelati Academy 12th c • Metekhi Church 13th c • Motsameta Monastery 10th c • Narikala Fortress 4th c • Prometheus Karst Caves • Tbilisi Mosque 19th c Mtskheta TOWN • Legvtakhevi waterfall • Svetitskhoveli Cathedral 11th c • Sulfur Bathhouse District • Jvari Monastery 6th c • Meidan Square • Sharden & King Erekle II streets KAKHETI region • Sioni Cathedral 13th c • Bodbe Monastery 9th c • Anchiskhati Basilica 7h c • Signagi Town Kartli province • Shumi Winery • Gori Town • Tsinandali • Museum and House of J. Stalin • Telavi Town • Uplistsikhe Caves 1st millennium B.C DAY TO DAY ITINERARY 1 DAY Tbilisi City Tour Georgian Holidays will organize a pick up from Tbilisi church you can spot the monument of King Vakhtang hotel in the morning. ‘Exploration of Georgia’ takes off I Gorgasali (trans. as “Wolf Head”) who ruled eastern with Tbilisi City tour on day 1. First, we are going to visit Georgia in 5th c. AD. He is credited with establishing Tbilisi the Holy Trinity Cathedral of Tbilisi (Sameba). Sameba is – the capital of Georgia. From Metekhi our tour moves one of the tallest Orthodox churches in the world and on to Narikala fortress. -
The Biodiversity Finance Policy and Institutional Review
THE BIODIVERSITY FINANCE POLICY AND INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW The Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) – Georgia THE BIODIVERSITY FINANCE POLICY AND INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW The Biodiversity Finance Initiative2016 (BIOFIN) – Georgia 2016 THE BIODIVERSITY FINANCE POLICY AND INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW The Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) – Georgia 2016 THE BIODIVERSITY FINANCE POLICY AND INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW The Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) – Georgia Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia and United Nations Development Programme, 2016. Tbilisi, Georgia. Biodiversity Finance Initiative – Georgia: The Biodiversity Finance Policy and Institutional Review. Final Report written by Tornike Phulariani, Levan Inashvili, Dimitri Papashvili and Levan Gogoberishvili. (80 Pages). Available from: http://www.ge.undp.org/content/georgia/en/home/projects/biodiversity-finance-initiative--biofinhtml https://www.biodiversityfinance.net/georgia BIOFIN Georgia Project Manager: Tornike Phulariani UNDP Environment & Energy Team Leader: Nino Antadze Senior Technical Advisor: David Meyers Biofin Global Manager: Onno van den Heuvel Disclaimer: The report was prepared and published with the support of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of UNDP. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project relied on inputs from many people working in biodiversity conservation and other sectors. We would like to acknowledge the following -
Svaneti – Ancient Historical and Geographical Province
Tourism Education Studies and Practice, 2016, Vol.(8), Is. 2 Copyright © 2016 by Academic Publishing House Researcher Published in the Russian Federation Tourism Education Studies and Practice Has been issued since 2014. ISSN: 2312-0037 E-ISSN: 2409-2436 Vol. 8, Is. 2, pp. 39-43, 2016 DOI: 10.13187/tesp.2016.8.39 www.ejournal10.com Articles and Statements UDC 33 Svaneti – Ancient Historical and Geographical Province Nana M. Berdzenishvili a , *, Besarion Beridzishvili a a Iakob Gogebashvili Telavi State University, Georgia Abstract Svaneti – is a mountainous region, falling to the west. Ushguli village is approximately 2100 meters above the sea level, the district center Mestia is at a height of 1400 meters from the sea, the Enguri, on the border of Eastern and Western Svaneti – 1200 meters, the merger Was and Inguri – 900 meters, the village Khaishi – a total of 600. Historically, the Upper Svaneti is divided into East and West, in other words on the Free and Princely. At the time, the princes of Dadeshkeliani could subdue the Western Svan communities to the river of Darla, but has not progressed further, and Darla became the border between the two Svaneti. In turn, the Dadiani princes conquered Lower Svaneti, but was not able to pass the pass the Sun, which became the boundary between the Lower and Upper Svaneti. As a result, the Eastern (Freestyle) Svaneti reached our time in a more archaic state, with a more traditional way of life and with a large number of stone buildings, which include temples and Svan towers. Here there are the most interesting objects and tourists concentrate their attention on this Svaneti. -
Diversifying Unity. How Eastern Partnership Countries Develop Their Economy, Governance and Identity in a Geopolitical Context
STUDY Diversifying unity How Eastern Partnership countries develop their economy, governance and identity in a geopolitical context Policy Department for External Relations Author: Mario DAMEN Directorate General for External Policies of the Union EN PE 639.307- November 2019 Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies ABSTRACT This study analyses the Eastern Partnership (EaP) in the year of its 10th anniversary. The Eastern Partnership was set up in 2009 as a joint policy initiative aiming at deepening and strengthening relations between the European Union, its Member States and the six EaP countries of Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan. While each of these countries shares a past in the former Soviet Union, they have developed over time in different directions. Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia have concluded Association Agreements with the EU, which include Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas. They will have to fulfil conditions laid down in the Association Agreements to make progress on reforms of governance, the judiciary and fighting corruption. Moreover, Georgia and Ukraine are seeking to integrate more deeply into the Western world order, aspiring to membership of NATO and the EU. Armenia and Azerbaijan have different ways of cooperating with the EU. Belarus is furthest from the EU because of its poor record on democracy and human rights. All six countries are to a certain extent within Russia’s sphere of influence and have to deal with several geopolitical constraints, but they have increasingly developed economic relations and national identities of their own. It will be a challenge to maintain a common perspective for the next 10 years of the Eastern Partnership and a further divergence between the countries is likely. -
Georgia Georg Ia
COUNTRY REPORT Georgia Georg ia November 2013 pull back from most occupied Georgian territory, but in late August 2008 Russia unilaterally recognized the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, and Russian military forces remain in those regions. Billionaire philanthropist Bidzina IVANISHVILI's unexpected entry into politics in October 2011 brought the divided opposition together under his Georgian Dream coalition, which won a majority of seats in the parliamentary election in October 2012 and removed UNM from power. The new constitution, shifting many powers from the president to the prime minister and parliament, including the power to name the prime minister and government ministers, did not go into effect until a new president was elected in the fall of 2013. Conceding defeat, SAAKASHVILI named IVANISHVILI as prime minister and allowed Georgian Dream to create a new government. Tensions remain high as IVANISHVILI, SAAKASHVILI, and their supporters struggle to co-exist until the end of the president's term. 2. Basic Data Official Name: Georgia Size: 69. 700 km2 . Limits: Located southwest of Asia, on the eastern coast of the Black Sea and south of Caucasus mountains. Georgia has borders with Armenia (164 km), Azerbaijan (322 1. General km), Russia (723 km) and Turkey (252 kilometres). The coastline of Georgia (Black Sea) has an area of 310 km. Population: 4,570,934 inhabitants (main ethnic groups: Georgian 83%, Azeri 6.5%, Armenian 5.7%, Russian 1.5%, other 2%). The region of present day Georgia contained the ancient kingdoms of Colchis and Kartli-Iberia. The area came under Roman influence in the first centuries A.D., and Capital: Tbilisi (1.115.000 inhabitants) Christianity became the state religion in the 330s. -
Cookbooks and Social Transformations in Georgia
Cooking Up National Identity: Cookbooks and Social Transformations in Georgia by Ana Makharadze Submitted to Central European University Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisors: Daniel Monterescu Alexandra Kowalski Budapest, Hungary CEU eTD Collection 2020 Abstract: The main objective of this thesis is to show how cookbooks both reflect and influence the transformation of national identity in post-socialist Georgia. To address this issue, I trace versions of the cookbook, Georgian Cuisine and Tried Housekeeping Notes by Barbare Jorjadze, in three periods of Georgian history (Pre-Soviet, Soviet and post-Soviet). I conduct discourse analysis of three editions of Jorjadze’s cookbook in reference to other cookbooks or similar projects from respective periods: Book for the Kitchen, The Book of Tasty and Healthy Food, The Family Book and restaurant ‘Barbarestan’ – commercial project that revolves around Jorjadze’s cookbook and identity. This work depicts how and why this cookbook has become a cultural artefact that bears profound emotional legitimacy and nurtures national sentiments in the community. Through tracing the narratives that are woven around these cookbooks, I demonstrate how the process of forming post-socialist identity in today’s Georgia is built on all the stages the cookbooks have gone through in the past century before they became material objects they are today. This research found that the cookbooks are used as a means of social influence in post-socialist Georgia by simply offering this narrative to the society as a choice of action in wide repertoire. The authors of these projects exercise some level of social influence, the degree of which is later “decided” by the public.