University of Baltimore Law ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law All Faculty Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 2007 Integrating Practical Training and Professional Legal Education: Three Questions for Three Systems James Maxeiner University of Baltimore School of Law,
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/all_fac Part of the Legal Education Commons, and the Legal Writing and Research Commons Recommended Citation Integrating Practical Training and Professional Legal Education: Three Questions for Three Systems, 13 IUS Gentium 2007 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. DRAFT 11 MAY 2007 – PRE PUBLICATION VERSION Published in THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF LAW AND LEGAL EDUCATION (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspec- tives on Law and Justice) (Springer 2009). Available at http://amzn.com/9048181402 Integrating Practical Training and Professional Legal Education: Three Questions for Three Systems Address to the Annual Meeting of the European American Consortium for Legal Education, May 25, 2007, Helsinki Finland © 2007 James R. Maxeiner Associate Professor of Law University of Baltimore School of Law Center for International and Comparative Law INTRODUCTION Reform of legal education is a hot topic. Talk today focuses on practical training. While I am interested in developments worldwide, I am going to talk principally about the three systems of legal education that I know best: the U.S., the German and the Japanese.