DOCSLIB.ORG

The Breeding Biology of the Dusky Honeyeater Myzomela Obscura in the Northern Territory, and the Importance of Nectar in the Diet of Nestling Honeyeaters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Breeding Biology of the Dusky Honeyeater Myzomela Obscura in the Northern Territory, and the Importance of Nectar in the Diet of Nestling Honeyeaters 97 AUSTRALIAN FIELD ORNITHOLOGY 2011, 28, 97–113 The Breeding Biology of the Dusky Honeyeater Myzomela obscura in the Northern Territory, and the Importance of Nectar in the Diet of Nestling Honeyeaters RICHARD A. NOSKE1 and ASHLEY J. CARLSON2 1Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory 0909 (Email: [email protected]) 2P.O. Box 4074, Forster, New South Wales 2428 (Email: [email protected]) Summary The breeding biology of the Dusky Honeyeater Myzomela obscura is poorly known, despite the species’ wide distribution and use of a broad range of habitats. In the Northern Territory, breeding was recorded in all months, but just over 50% of estimated laying dates were in April and May, corresponding with the transition from the wet to the dry season. In Darwin, nests were placed 1.0 to 9.0 m above the ground in a variety of trees or tall shrubs, including exotics. The size of clutches or broods never exceeded two (n = 9). At two closely observed nests, the incubation period was 12.4 and 12.75 days, similar to another myzomeline honeyeater. Nest-attentiveness was ~65% over 2 days at one nest, similar to the few temperate-zone Australian honeyeaters for which such data are available. The nestling period at the only successful nest that we observed was 14.3 ± 0.7 days, consistent with slightly smaller species in other honeyeater genera. Unlike most honeyeater species, nestling Dusky Honeyeaters hatched with much down. Diurnal brooding represented 20–28% of the presumed female’s time during the first 4 days after hatching, but had ceased by Day 6, earlier than in temperate-zone honeyeater species. The mean rate of food provisioning was very low (8.9 feeds/h) compared with that of most other honeyeater species studied to date. Evidence suggests that Dusky Honeyeaters may feed their young largely on nectar. Introduction The Dusky Honeyeater Myzomela obscura ranges from North Maluku in eastern Indonesia through southern New Guinea to coastal and subcoastal Northern Territory (NT; the nominate subspecies, M.o. obscura) and Queensland (M.o. harterti) (Higgins et al. 2001) in Australia. It occurs in a variety of habitats, at recorded densities of 0.06–0.64 bird/ha (Higgins et al. 2001). Near Darwin, NT, it was most common in eucalypt forest with a dense understorey and semi-evergreen monsoon vine forest (0.4–0.6 bird/ha: Woinarski et al. 1988). In Kakadu National Park, NT, it was most abundant in monsoon rainforests, particularly in sandstone-spring monsoon rainforests (Brooker et al. 1990; Woinarski 1993). The species appears to be sedentary within large home-ranges. In heterogeneous native vegetation on a 470-ha plot 40 km south-west of Darwin, it was one of five species of honeyeaters that were present throughout a 39-month study (Franklin & Noske 1998). Recapture rates (13%) of banded birds (n = 149) were slightly lower than for the much commoner, slightly smaller, Brown Honeyeater Lichmera indistincta, and just over 50% of recaptured Dusky Honeyeaters were retrapped within 200 m of the banding site, with the maximum recorded movement being 1.2 km, and the maximum time elapsed to recapture 29 months (Franklin & Noske 1998). Despite this wide distribution and the broad habitat requirements, the breeding biology of this species is poorly known, with only six nest records in the Nest AUSTRALIAN 98 NOSKE & CARLSON FIELD ORNITHOLOGY Record Scheme (NRS) of Birds Australia up to 1998 (Higgins et al. 2001). Based on the gonadal condition of eight specimens collected in Darwin and Arnhem Land, NT, Deignan (1964) suggested that the ‘breeding season is of long duration in the [Northern] Territory’. Indeed, Noske & Franklin (1999) recorded breeding in almost all months of the year in the monsoon tropics of the NT. This is in contrast with the situation for the congeneric Red-headed Honeyeater Myzomela erythrocephala and several other species of honeyeater (Meliphagidae) in the region, which breed during the dry season (May–October), when nectar is most abundant (Noske & Franklin 1999; Franklin & Noske 2000). In this paper we describe the breeding season and clutch-size of the nominate subspecies of Dusky Honeyeater breeding in the NT from opportunistic observations and published sources, as well the incubation and nestling periods, and parental care at two nests in suburban Darwin. Methods We collated breeding records for the NT from two sources: (1) opportunistic records in Darwin (12°28′S, 130°52′E) since 1988 (by RAN), including those reported by Noske & Franklin (1999); and (2) the published literature, importantly including two records of breeding within 50 km of Darwin (Crawford 1972), three from Nhulunbuy (12°15′S, 136°45′E: Boekel 1976; Officer 1976), one from Kakadu National Park (12°33′S, 132°18′E: Brooker & Parker 1985) and one from Pine Creek (13°49′S, 131°50′E: Rix 1970). The NT lies within the Australian monsoonal tropics, which experiences little seasonal fluctuation in temperature and light availability. However, rainfall is highly seasonal, with >90% falling between November and April (the wet season). Mean annual rainfall at Darwin is ~1700 mm [1941–2009; http://www.bom.gov.au/nt (accessed 10 July 2010)], whereas at Nhulunbuy, farther to the east, mean annual rainfall is slightly lower and less seasonal, and the wet season begins and ends ~1 month later than in the west (Langkamp et al. 1979). Consistent with the literature, we define the breeding season as the months in which eggs are laid. As exact dates for laying were rarely determined, however, we have estimated the month of laying by extrapolation from dates on which eggs, nestlings or fledglings (which comprised most of our observations) were recorded. For example, Crawford’s (1972) breeding records comprise a bird sitting on a nest on 1 June 1968, and a dependent juvenile on 6 December 1970; we have estimated that laying for these birds occurred in May and November, respectively. Where only eggs were recorded, we have assumed that they were laid in the same month, unless the date fell within the first week, in which case half of the clutch was attributed to the previous month. Unless otherwise stated, records of building were excluded from the analyses because of the well-known tendency of many Australian birds to abandon nests before laying in them. In accordance with Marchant (1980), the duration of the incubation period at each nest was calculated from the midpoint between the maximum interval (i.e. from the last observation before the clutch was completed to the first observation of all eggs hatched) and minimum interval (i.e. from the first observation of the full clutch to the last observation of unhatched eggs), plus or minus half the range in hours between the difference of these intervals; the nestling period—i.e. from hatching to fledging—was calculated in a similar way. The contents of some nests were observed by using a mirror mounted on a pole. Detailed observations were made at two nests in Darwin, one in the suburb of Wagaman (12°23′08˝S, 130°53′08˝E) and the other in Jingili (12°23′21˝S, 130°52′18˝E). Both nests were in typical suburban yards consisting of a lawn with isolated exotic shrubs and palms (Wagaman) or garden beds of young native shrubs (Jingili). The Wagaman nest was discovered on 9 April 2008 during its construction, and was watched over 2 days during the incubation period (total 7.5 h) and 1 day during the nestling period (4.2 h) from a distance of 7 m, with the aid of 10 × 42 binoculars. The Jingili nest was built in a pot-plant on a concrete slab under the eaves of a house, beside a carport. It was found on 18 July 2009 during its construction, but observed only sporadically until the eggs hatched, after which nest activity was recorded for up to 6.6 h on each of 9 days during the nestling period (total 29.7 h), using a video camera set up near an open louvred window with a flyscreen inside VOL. 28 (3) SEPTEMBER 2011 Breeding Biology of Dusky Honeyeater, NT 99 a room of the adjacent house. Although the camera was only 1 m from the nest, the birds appeared not to be affected by it, or indeed by the frequent motion of, or sounds made by, human occupants of the room. Consistent with the literature (e.g. Conway & Martin 2000), we refer to bouts of incubating or brooding on the nest and absence from the nest as on- and off-bouts, respectively. Nest-attentiveness (the percentage of time spent by the sitting bird on the nest) was calculated from all video-recorded samples combined. Because video-recording sessions usually started when the incubating or brooding bird was already sitting or absent (incomplete bouts), only complete periods of absence from the nest were considered in calculating the total video-recording sample time, and hence feeding rates and brooding effort. The first or last incubation or brooding bout was discounted from the analysis so that the number of on- and off-bouts was equal. All means are given ± Standard Deviation. The species is sexually monomorphic in plumage and bare parts and, consequently, the sex of the birds attending the nest could not be determined. No more than two adults were observed at each nest, but no attempt was made to trap and colour-band adults. Given the frequency of co-operative breeding in honeyeaters (Higgins et al. 2008), the possibility of helpers cannot be ruled out completely, although we have no evidence for it in this species.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indonesia's Exquisite Birds of Paradise
    INDONESIA'S EXQUISITE BIRDS OF PARADISE Whether you are a mere nestling who is new to bird watching, a Halmehera: Standard-wing (Wallace’s) Bird-of fully-fledged birder, or a seasoned twitcher, this 10-day (9-night) ornithological adventure through the remote, rainforest-clad islands of northern Raja Ampat and North Maluku, which includes a two-night stay at the famed Weda Resort on Halmahera, is a fantastic opportunity to add some significant numbers to your life lists. No other feathered family is as beautiful, or displays such diversity of plumage, extravagant decoration, and courtship behaviour as the ostentatious Bird of Paradise. In the company of our guest expert, Dr. Kees Groeneboer, we will be in hot pursuit of as many as six or seven species of these fabled shapeshifters, which strut, dazzle and dance in costumes worthy of the stage. -Paradise, Paradise Crow. Special birds in the Weda-Forest of Raja Ampat is one of the most noteworthy ecological niches on Halmahera Moluccan Goshawk, Moluccan Scrubfowl, Bare-eyed the planet, where you can snorkel within a below-surface world Rail, Drummer Rail, Scarletbreasted Fruit-Dove, Blue-capped reminiscent of a living kaleidoscope, while marveling at Fruit-Dove, Cinnamon-bellied Imperial Pigeon, Chattering Lory, above-surface views – and birds, which are among the most White (Alba) Cockatoo, Moluccan Cuckoo, Goliath Coucal, Blue stunning that you are likely to behold in a lifetime. Meanwhile, and-white Kingfisher, Sombre Kingfisher, Azure (Purple) Halmahera, in the North Maluku province, is where some of the Dollarbird, Ivory-breasted Pitta, Halmahera Cuckooshrike, world’s rarest and least-known birds occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Birds in Tilligerry Habitat
    Common Birds in Tilligerry Habitat Dedicated bird enthusiasts have kindly contributed to this sequence of 106 bird species spotted in the habitat over the last few years Kookaburra Red-browed Finch Black-faced Cuckoo- shrike Magpie-lark Tawny Frogmouth Noisy Miner Spotted Dove [1] Crested Pigeon Australian Raven Olive-backed Oriole Whistling Kite Grey Butcherbird Pied Butcherbird Australian Magpie Noisy Friarbird Galah Long-billed Corella Eastern Rosella Yellow-tailed black Rainbow Lorikeet Scaly-breasted Lorikeet Cockatoo Tawny Frogmouth c Noeline Karlson [1] ( ) Common Birds in Tilligerry Habitat Variegated Fairy- Yellow Faced Superb Fairy-wren White Cheeked Scarlet Honeyeater Blue-faced Honeyeater wren Honeyeater Honeyeater White-throated Brown Gerygone Brown Thornbill Yellow Thornbill Eastern Yellow Robin Silvereye Gerygone White-browed Eastern Spinebill [2] Spotted Pardalote Grey Fantail Little Wattlebird Red Wattlebird Scrubwren Willie Wagtail Eastern Whipbird Welcome Swallow Leaden Flycatcher Golden Whistler Rufous Whistler Eastern Spinebill c Noeline Karlson [2] ( ) Common Sea and shore birds Silver Gull White-necked Heron Little Black Australian White Ibis Masked Lapwing Crested Tern Cormorant Little Pied Cormorant White-bellied Sea-Eagle [3] Pelican White-faced Heron Uncommon Sea and shore birds Caspian Tern Pied Cormorant White-necked Heron Great Egret Little Egret Great Cormorant Striated Heron Intermediate Egret [3] White-bellied Sea-Eagle (c) Noeline Karlson Uncommon Birds in Tilligerry Habitat Grey Goshawk Australian Hobby
    [Show full text]
  • Management and Breeding of Birds of Paradise (Family Paradisaeidae) at the Al Wabra Wildlife Preservation
    Management and breeding of Birds of Paradise (family Paradisaeidae) at the Al Wabra Wildlife Preservation. By Richard Switzer Bird Curator, Al Wabra Wildlife Preservation. Presentation for Aviary Congress Singapore, November 2008 Introduction to Birds of Paradise in the Wild Taxonomy The family Paradisaeidae is in the order Passeriformes. In the past decade since the publication of Frith and Beehler (1998), the taxonomy of the family Paradisaeidae has been re-evaluated considerably. Frith and Beehler (1998) listed 42 species in 17 genera. However, the monotypic genus Macgregoria (MacGregor’s Bird of Paradise) has been re-classified in the family Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters). Similarly, 3 species in 2 genera (Cnemophilus and Loboparadisea) – formerly described as the “Wide-gaped Birds of Paradise” – have been re-classified as members of the family Melanocharitidae (Berrypeckers and Longbills) (Cracraft and Feinstein 2000). Additionally the two genera of Sicklebills (Epimachus and Drepanornis) are now considered to be combined as the one genus Epimachus. These changes reduce the total number of genera in the family Paradisaeidae to 13. However, despite the elimination of the 4 species mentioned above, 3 species have been newly described – Berlepsch's Parotia (P. berlepschi), Eastern or Helen’s Parotia (P. helenae) and the Eastern or Growling Riflebird (P. intercedens). The Berlepsch’s Parotia was once considered to be a subspecies of the Carola's Parotia. It was previously known only from four female specimens, discovered in 1985. It was rediscovered during a Conservation International expedition in 2005 and was photographed for the first time. The Eastern Parotia, also known as Helena's Parotia, is sometimes considered to be a subspecies of Lawes's Parotia, but differs in the male’s frontal crest and the female's dorsal plumage colours.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HONEYEATERS of KANGAROO ISLAND HUGH FOB,D Accepted August
    134 SOUTH AUsTRALIAN ORNITHOLOGIST, 21 THE HONEYEATERS OF KANGAROO ISLAND HUGH FOB,D Accepted August. 1976 Kangaroo Island is the third largest of Aus­ In the present paper I discuss morphological tralia's islands (4,500 sq. km) and has been and ecological differences between populations separated from the neighbouring Fleurieu of several species of honeyeaters from Kangaroo Peninsula for 10,000 years (Abbott 1973). A Island and the Fleurieu Peninsula respectively, mere 14 km separates island from mainland; and speculate on how these differences origin­ but the island has a distinct avifauna and lacks ated. many of the mainland species. This paucity of DIFFERENCES IN PLUMAGE species has been attributed to extinction after The Kangaroo Island population of Purple­ isolation and failure to recolonise (Abbott gaped Honeyeater was described as larger and 1974, 1976), and to lack of suitable habitat brighter than the mainland population by (Ford and Paton 1975). Mathews (1923-4). Brightness of plumage is a Nine species of honeyeaters are resident on very subjective characteristic, and in my opinion Kangaroo Island. The Purple-gaped Honey­ Purple-gaped Honeyeaters on Kangaroo Island eater Lichenostomus cratitius (formerly Meli­ are, if anything, duller than mainland ones. phaga cratitia) was described as a distinct sub­ Condon (1951) says that the gape of this species by Mathews (1923-24); and Keast species is invariably yellow on Kangaroo Island (1961) mentions that six other species differ in instead of lilac, although he later comments a minor way from mainland populations and that lilac-gaped individuals do occur on the may merit subspecific status.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Oxley Creek Common Brisbane, Australia
    Birding Oxley Creek Common Brisbane, Australia Hugh Possingham and Mat Gilfedder – January 2011 [email protected] www.ecology.uq.edu.au 3379 9388 (h) Other photos, records and comments contributed by: Cathy Gilfedder, Mike Bennett, David Niland, Mark Roberts, Pete Kyne, Conrad Hoskin, Chris Sanderson, Angela Wardell-Johnson, Denis Mollison. This guide provides information about the birds, and how to bird on, Oxley Creek Common. This is a public park (access restricted to the yellow parts of the map, page 6). Over 185 species have been recorded on Oxley Creek Common in the last 83 years, making it one of the best birding spots in Brisbane. This guide is complimented by a full annotated list of the species seen in, or from, the Common. How to get there Oxley Creek Common is in the suburb of Rocklea and is well signposted from Sherwood Road. If approaching from the east (Ipswich Road side), pass the Rocklea Markets and turn left before the bridge crossing Oxley Creek. If approaching from the west (Sherwood side) turn right about 100 m after the bridge over Oxley Creek. The gate is always open. Amenities The main development at Oxley Creek Common is the Red Shed, which is beside the car park (plenty of space). The Red Shed has toilets (composting), water, covered seating, and BBQ facilities. The toilets close about 8pm and open very early. The paths are flat, wide and easy to walk or cycle. When to arrive The diversity of waterbirds is a feature of the Common and these can be good at any time of the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Brown Honeyeater Lichmera Indistincta Species No.: 597 Band Size: 02 (01) AY
    Australian Bird Study Association Inc. – Bird in the Hand (Second Edition), published on www.absa.asn.au - Revised August 2019 Brown Honeyeater Lichmera indistincta Species No.: 597 Band Size: 02 (01) AY Morphometrics: Adult Male Adult Female THL: 30.7 – 36 mm 30.3 – 34.1 mm Wing Length: 54 – 76 mm 53 – 68 mm Wing Span: > 220 mm < 215 mm Tail: 48 – 64 mm 47 – 58 mm Tarsus: 15.8 – 19.5 mm 15.3 – 17.3 mm Weight: 7.9 – 13.6 g 7.0 – 12.1 g Ageing and sexing: Adult Male Adult Female Juvenile Forehead, crown dark brown with thick dark, brown with olive like female, but loose & & nape: brownish-grey fringes or wash or greenish; downy texture; silvery grey; Bill: fully black; black, but often with mostly black with yellow pinkish-white base; -ish tinge near base; Gape black when breeding, but yellow, yellowish white, puffy yellow; yellow or yellowish white pinkish white or buff- when not breeding; yellow; Chin & throat: brownish grey; brownish grey with straw similar to female, but -yellow fringes; looser and downy; Juvenile does not have yellow triangle feather tuft behind eye until about three months after fledging; Immature plumage is very similar to adult female, but may retain juvenile remiges, rectrices and upper wing coverts; Adult plumage is acquired at approximately 15 months - so age adults (2+) and Immatures either (2) or (1) if very young and downy. Apart from plumage differences, males appear considerably larger than females, but there Is a large overlap in most measurements, except in wingspan; Female alone incubates.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Birding Tour Report
    AUSTRALIA’S TOP END Victoria River to Kakadu 9 – 17 October 2009 Tour Leader: Iain Campbell Having run the Northern Territory trip every year since 2005, and multiple times in some years, I figured it really is about time that I wrote a trip report for this tour. The tour program changed this year as it was just so dry in central Australia, we decided to limit the tour to the Top End where the birding is always spectacular, and skip the Central Australia section where birding is beginning to feel like pulling teeth; so you end up with a shorter but jam-packed tour laden with parrots, pigeons, finches, and honeyeaters. Throw in some amazing scenery, rock art, big crocs, and thriving aboriginal culture you have a fantastic tour. As for the list, we pretty much got everything, as this is the kind of tour where by the nature of the birding, you can leave with very few gaps in the list. 9 October: Around Darwin The Top End trip started around three in the afternoon, and the very first thing we did was shoot out to Fogg Dam. This is a wetlands to behold, as you drive along a causeway with hundreds of Intermediate Egrets, Magpie-Geese, Pied Herons, Green Pygmy-geese, Royal Spoonbills, Rajah Shelducks, and Comb-crested Jacanas all close and very easy to see. While we were watching the waterbirds, we had tens of Whistling Kites and Black Kites circling overhead. When I was a child birder and thought of the Top End, Fogg Dam and it's birds was the image in my mind, so it is always great to see the reaction of others when they see it for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Band Size List Page 1
    Jun 00 Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme - Recommended Band Size List Page 1 Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme Recommended Band Size List - Birds of Australia and its Territories Number 24 - May 2000 This list contains all extant bird species which have been recorded for Australia and its Territories, including Antarctica, Norfolk Island, Christmas Island and Cocos and Keeling Islands, with their respective RAOU numbers and band sizes as recommended by the Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme. The list is in two parts: Part 1 is in taxonomic order, based on information in "The Taxonomy and Species of Birds of Australia and its Territories" (1994) by Leslie Christidis and Walter E. Boles, RAOU Monograph 2, RAOU, Melbourne, for non-passerines; and “The Directory of Australian Birds: Passerines” (1999) by R. Schodde and I.J. Mason, CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, for passerines. Part 2 is in alphabetic order of common names. The lists include sub-species where these are listed on the Census of Australian Vertebrate Species (CAVS version 8.1, 1994). CHOOSING THE CORRECT BAND Selecting the appropriate band to use combines several factors, including the species to be banded, variability within the species, growth characteristics of the species, and band design. The following list recommends band sizes and metals based on reports from banders, compiled over the life of the ABBBS. For most species, the recommended sizes have been used on substantial numbers of birds. For some species, relatively few individuals have been banded and the size is listed with a question mark. In still other species, too few birds have been banded to justify a size recommendation and none is made.
    [Show full text]
  • Bush Birds Making Your Place Their Place Too
    BUSH BIRDS MAKING YOUR PLACE THEIR PLACE TOO This fact sheet explains which bush birds may be present or absent from your place and what you can do to encourage a greater diversity to live with you. The drier, settled areas of southern Tasmania, and whistlers. Some, like Pink Robin and Scrubtit, compared to other places, still have much of their prefer wet forest and others, such as Forty- original bush. In many instances the clearing for spotted Pardalote are rarely seen outside their agriculture and urban development has produced preferred specialist habitat. a mosaic of habitats including highly modified The Yellow-throated Honeyeater needs bush with Some species live in the same bush all year, treeless paddocks through to fully vegetated hills, good structure, as it forages high in trees but nests whilst others migrate in the late autumn to in which many species of birds still thrive. But bird in shrubs close to the ground. increase their foraging range, descend in species begin to decline or will be absent where altitude or cross Bass Strait to spend their intact patches of bush are lost or if this mosaic winter on mainland Australia. Bush habitat also BUSH BIRDS’ HOMES becomes too highly modified. supports birds of prey, water birds in creeks and Just like us, birds have three basic needs: About 60 species of birds live within the bush of wetlands, and a small number of other species 1. Their preferred food. southern Tasmania. Common groups of species using heaths or grasslands on the forest fringe. include honeyeaters, parrots, robins, pardalotes 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Recovery Plan for the Sihek Or Guam Micronesian Kingfisher (Halcyon Cinnamomina Cinnamomina)
    DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate actions which the best available science indicates are required to recover and protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Recovery teams serve as independent advisors to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans are reviewed by the public and submitted to additional peer review before they are approved and adopted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Nothing in this plan should be construed as a commitment or requirement that any Federal agency obligate or pay funds in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 USC 1341, or any other law or regulation. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed as approved by the Regional Director or Director. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. Please check for updates or revisions at the website addresses provided below before using this plan. Literature citation of this document should read as follows: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Printable PDF Format
    Field Guides Tour Report Australia Part 2 2019 Oct 22, 2019 to Nov 11, 2019 John Coons & Doug Gochfeld For our tour description, itinerary, past triplists, dates, fees, and more, please VISIT OUR TOUR PAGE. Water is a precious resource in the Australian deserts, so watering holes like this one near Georgetown are incredible places for concentrating wildlife. Two of our most bird diverse excursions were on our mornings in this region. Photo by guide Doug Gochfeld. Australia. A voyage to the land of Oz is guaranteed to be filled with novelty and wonder, regardless of whether we’ve been to the country previously. This was true for our group this year, with everyone coming away awed and excited by any number of a litany of great experiences, whether they had already been in the country for three weeks or were beginning their Aussie journey in Darwin. Given the far-flung locales we visit, this itinerary often provides the full spectrum of weather, and this year that was true to the extreme. The drought which had gripped much of Australia for months on end was still in full effect upon our arrival at Darwin in the steamy Top End, and Georgetown was equally hot, though about as dry as Darwin was humid. The warmth persisted along the Queensland coast in Cairns, while weather on the Atherton Tablelands and at Lamington National Park was mild and quite pleasant, a prelude to the pendulum swinging the other way. During our final hours below O’Reilly’s, a system came through bringing with it strong winds (and a brush fire warning that unfortunately turned out all too prescient).
    [Show full text]
  • Darwin and Northern Territory (06/22/2019 – 07/06/2019) – Birding Report
    Darwin and Northern Territory (06/22/2019 – 07/06/2019) – Birding Report Participants: Corey Callaghan and Diane Callaghan Email: [email protected] Overview: At an Australasian Ornithological Conference in Geelong, November 2017, they announced that the next conference would be in Darwin in 2019. I immediately booked it in the calendar that that is when I would do the typical Darwin birding trip. Diane was on board, and so we decided to do a solid birding trip before the conference in early July. There are some tricky ‘must-get’ birds here, and overall we did pretty well. We ended with 198 species for the trip, and got pretty much all the critical top end birds. Didn’t get any of the mangrove specialties (e.g., whistlers, and fantail), but I was still pleased with how we did. Highlights included all the finches that we saw, and the great spread of waterbirds. Chestnut Rail was also a highlight. When I went to the conference, I dropped Diane off to go hiking at Litchfield National Park, but before that we did a 10 day trip, driving out to Timber Creek and then back. Read below for day- by-day highlights, some photos, and various birding locations. Any hyperlinks should take you to the associated location and/or eBird checklists, which would provide precise coordinates and sometimes more detailed location notes. *Note: I follow the eBird/clements taxonomy, which differs in bird names from IOC. Blue-faced Honeyeater Day 1 (June 22nd, 2019): Flight from Sydney to Darwin We had an early flight from Sydney and got into Darwin at about 2:00 PM.
    [Show full text]