Targeting B Cells and Plasma Cells in Glomerular Diseases: Translational Perspectives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Targeting B Cells and Plasma Cells in Glomerular Diseases: Translational Perspectives BRIEF REVIEW www.jasn.org Targeting B Cells and Plasma Cells in Glomerular Diseases: Translational Perspectives Eva Schrezenmeier,1 David Jayne,2 and Thomas Dörner3 1Divisions of Nephrology and Intensive Care, and 3Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany; and 2Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom ABSTRACT The unique contributions of memory B cells and plasma cells in kidney diseases idiopathic membranous nephropathy remain unclear. In this review, we evaluate the clinical experience with treatments (IMN). In contrast, SLE did not show directed at B cells, such as rituximab, and at plasma cells, such as proteasome in- similarly convincing responses to CD20 hibition, to shed light on the role of these two B lineage compartments in glomerular targeting. In chronic antibody-mediated diseases. Specifically, analysis of these targeted interventions in diseases such as rejection (ABMR), the addition of PC ANCA-associated vasculitis, SLE, and antibody-mediated transplant rejection per- targeting agents (e.g., the proteasome in- mits insight into the pathogenetic effect of these cells. Notwithstanding the limita- hibitor bortezomib) appears to be bene- tions of preclinical models and clinical studies (heterogeneous populations, among ficial, with less evidence for rituximab.4 others), the data suggest that memory B and plasma cells represent two engines of Currently available data from more se- autoimmunity, with variable involvement in these diseases. Whereas memory B cells lective immune targeting suggests that and plasma cells appear to be key in ANCA-associated vasculitis and antibody- the pathogenic relevance of memory B mediated transplant rejection, respectively, SLE seems likely to be driven by both cells and PCs may vary between autoim- autoimmune compartments. These conclusions have implications for the future de- mune diseases (reviewed recently5), im- velopment of targeted therapeutics in immune-mediated renal disease. proving our understanding of individual diseases. J Am Soc Nephrol 29: 741–758, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2017040367 Here we will take a reverse translational perspective to learn from the clinical use of Bcell–directed therapies such as anti- CD20 or therapies that target the PC com- In health, memory B cells and plasma recirculate upon antigen re-exposure. partment in renal autoimmunity. cells (PCs) comprise important but Overall, memory B cells and PCs form independently regulated compartments two immune defense lines that allow pres- 1 of our immunologic memory (Figure 1). ervation of previous immune encounters INDUCTION OF MEMORY B CELLS Humoral immunity is key to the patho- by antibodies produced by long-lived PCs AND PCS genesis of many autoimmune renal dis- and a dynamic component to adapt hu- eases. Here B cells, when recognizing moral immunity by memory B cells. The Distinct PC subsets can be induced via (auto)antigens and receiving appropriate two cellular subsets ensure stability and different pathways (Figure 1). First, B fl fi T cell help, can differentiate into short- exibility to maintain a suf cient B cell cells from the B1 cell lineage, which lived PCs, memory B or long-lived PCs lineage defense. The extent to which these have been mainly studied in mice and also termed memory PCs2. However, their “two engines” of B cell lineage memory detailed contributions to different kidney contribute to different renal autoimmune diseases are not known. diseases is not fully understood, but is Published online ahead of print. Publication date Long-lived PCs are considered ulti- likely to differ between disorders. available at www.jasn.org. mately differentiated, bone marrow In this context, clinical experiences Correspondence: Dr. Thomas Dörner, Department (BM) resident cells secreting high-affinity with therapeutics selectively targeting of Medicine/Rheumatology and Clinical Immunol- + 2 ogy, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus antibodies that disseminate through the CD20 memory B cells but not CD20 Mitte, Berlin, Germany. Email: thomas.doerner@ body, whereas memory B cells3 can rap- PCs provided interesting lessons (Figure charite.de idly proliferate in a clonally and antigen 2A), e.g., the response to rituximab in Copyright © 2018 by the American Society of specific manner, and differentiate and ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) and Nephrology J Am Soc Nephrol 29: 741–758, 2018 ISSN : 1046-6673/2903-741 741 BRIEF REVIEW www.jasn.org Figure 1. Distinct developmental and differentiation pathways of normal B cells. B1 and B2 B cell lineages appear to be independently regulated and undergo tightly controlled differentiation into certain memory B and PC subsets (Adapted from Dörner T et al.187 lack a defined phenotype in humans, switch, first producing memory B cells Most but not all memory B cells have can form short-lived PCs, which pro- and subsequently long-lived PCs13 with undergone class-switch recombination, duce polyreactive IgM for immediate increasing affinity. It has long been sug- typically from IgM to IgG, and carry so- defense. Second, B cells from the B2 gested, but now experimentally proven, matically hypermutated IgV gene re- cell lineage can form short-lived PCs in that memory B cells can also develop in a arrangements16,17 as one signature of aTcell–independent manner (so-called T cell–dependent, but germinal center– previous T cell encounters. Loss of IgD 2 marginal zone B2 cells), for example by independent pathway.14 Bcelllineage expression (IgD )identifies B cells that stimulation with T cell-independent an- differentiation paths are summarized in have undergone class-switch recombi- tigens such as pneumococcal capsular Figure 1. The bulk of the data reported nation. Switched memory B cells de- polysaccharides, and predominantly se- above has been obtained from preclinical velop during T cell–dependent germinal crete low-affinity IgM antibodies.6,7 models, although it remains to be delin- center responses.13 In addition to Ig sub- Moreover, B2 lineage cells are the main eated which differentiation pathway(s) class B cell receptor (BCR) expression, source of long-lived PCs and memory B and B cell lineages are involved in certain other phenotypic B memory markers cells upon activation by cognate T cells autoimmune conditions. have been identified. Here, expression in germinal centers.8 The generation of of CD27 serves as a universal marker long-lived PCs is the result of a two-step for memory B cells in healthy donors. process. First, an extrafollicular response MEMORY B CELLS The BCR of memory B cells shows a leads to the generation of short-lived ac- high affinity to the immunizing antigen tivated B cells, of which some re-enter the The definition of a memory B cell com- compared with naïve B cells caused by B cell follicle and become plasmablasts prises an antigen-experienced, nonpro- using affinity-matured and somatically in a T cell–dependent pathway. Subse- liferating and, in the absence of antigen, hypermutated BCR genes.18 Memory B quently, plasmablasts migrate through persisting cell15 that responds more rap- cells that emerge from the T cell–dependent the blood stream and reside as long-lived idly and efficiently when re-exposed to but germinal center–independent PCs primarily in BM niches, possibly also antigen. In contrast to sessile PCs, mem- pathway do not show somatic hypermu- in inflamed tissues.9,10 It is currently de- ory B cells recirculate and scan the body tations, and thus are not affinity ma- bated whether a small number of BM continuously. Their phenotype does not tured.19 After a given immune response, memory PCs can be induced indepen- differ between certain lymphoid organs, memory B cells must repress their acti- dently of T cells.11,12 The germinal center and they do not depend on the presence vation program and rest in a quiescent response is a time-regulated developmental of the spleen or tonsil.3 state for a long period to maintain their 742 Journal of the American Society of Nephrology J Am Soc Nephrol 29: 741–758, 2018 www.jasn.org BRIEF REVIEW Figure 2. Interventions and their potential to target distinctly B lineage subsets and plasma cells. (A) Principles of direct (anti-CD20, anti- CD22) and indirect targeting of B cells and PCs (anti-BAFF or anti-APRIL strategies) have preferential effects on naïve versus memory B cells and PCs. (B) Principle of unspecific B cell and PC targeting, i.e., by proteasome inhibition or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with or without antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as well as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or cyclophosphamide. There appears to be a distinct susceptibility of memory B cell and PC dependent on the pharmacologic mechanisms. memory capacity.20 Upon antigen reacti- is not clear if they result from incomplete high-affinity antibodies and reside preferen- vation, memory B cells become activated germinal center responses, increased extra- tially inthe BM. Onlyafew plasmablasts that and can differentiate either into PCs or follicular activity and/or enhanced T cell– arise from the germinal center response mi- further mature by re-entering the germi- independent B cell activation. Usually, these grate through the blood stream to become nal center for additional affinity matura- cells carry characteristics of B cell memory memory PCs.9 Crucialforthesurvivalof tion.21 The involvement of memory B (e.g., mutated IgV genes), expressed costi- a plasmablast to become an ultimately dif- cells during resolution of an immune re- mulatory molecules, or lacked an active ferentiated, long-lived PC is that they find sponse and the mechanisms by which res- ABCB1 transporter as functional character- appropriate soluble and insoluble (niche) ident memory B cells are prevented from istic of memory B cells. It is currently not survival conditions, whereas no postgerminal uncontrolled activation remain unclear clear if these abnormalities of B cell memory center selection processes of PCs are known. for immunity as well as autoimmunity. are a source of autoimmunity or result of Long-lived PCs, also called memory PCs, Notably, disturbances of circulating overly active immune activation.
Recommended publications
  • BAFF-Neutralizing Interaction of Belimumab Related to Its Therapeutic Efficacy for Treating Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03620-2 OPEN BAFF-neutralizing interaction of belimumab related to its therapeutic efficacy for treating systemic lupus erythematosus Woori Shin1, Hyun Tae Lee1, Heejin Lim1, Sang Hyung Lee1, Ji Young Son1, Jee Un Lee1, Ki-Young Yoo1, Seong Eon Ryu2, Jaejun Rhie1, Ju Yeon Lee1 & Yong-Seok Heo1 1234567890():,; BAFF, a member of the TNF superfamily, has been recognized as a good target for auto- immune diseases. Belimumab, an anti-BAFF monoclonal antibody, was approved by the FDA for use in treating systemic lupus erythematosus. However, the molecular basis of BAFF neutralization by belimumab remains unclear. Here our crystal structure of the BAFF–belimumab Fab complex shows the precise epitope and the BAFF-neutralizing mechanism of belimumab, and demonstrates that the therapeutic activity of belimumab involves not only antagonizing the BAFF–receptor interaction, but also disrupting the for- mation of the more active BAFF 60-mer to favor the induction of the less active BAFF trimer through interaction with the flap region of BAFF. In addition, the belimumab HCDR3 loop mimics the DxL(V/L) motif of BAFF receptors, thereby binding to BAFF in a similar manner as endogenous BAFF receptors. Our data thus provides insights for the design of new drugs targeting BAFF for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. 1 Department of Chemistry, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea. 2 Department of Bio Engineering, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea. These authors contributed equally: Woori Shin, Hyun Tae Lee, Heejin Lim, Sang Hyung Lee.
    [Show full text]
  • SAHLGRENSKA AKADEMIN Thymic Studies
    Göteborg, 2019 Thymic studies Investigations into the effects of childhood thymectomy, and characterization of thymic B cells and Hassall's corpuscles Akademisk avhandling Som för avläggande av medicine doktorsexamen vid Sahlgrenska akademin, Göteborgs universitet kommer att offentligen försvaras i föreläsningssalen våning 3, Guldhedsgatan 10A, Göteborg Tisdagen den 14e maj, klockan 13.00 av Christina Lundqvist Fakultetsopponent: Professor Ludger Klein Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Tyskland Avhandlingen baseras på följande delarbeten I. Gudmundsdottir J*, Lundqvist C*, Ijspeert H, van der Slik E, Óskarsdóttir S, Lindgren S, Lundberg V, Berglund M, Lingman-Framme J, Telemo E, van der Burg M, Ekwall O. T-cell receptor sequencing reveals decreased diversity 18 years after early thymectomy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Dec;140(6):1743- 1746.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Sep 1. * These authors contributed equally to this work. II. Lundqvist C*, Camponeschi A*, Visentini M, Telemo E, Ekwall O‡, Mårtensson IL‡. Switched CD21-/low B cells with an antigen-presenting phenotype in the infant thymus. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Nov 30. pii: S0091-6749(18)31721- 4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.11.019. * These authors contributed equally to this work. ‡ These authors contributed equally to this work. III. Lundqvist C, Lindgren S, Cheuk S, Lundberg V, Berglund M, Thörn K, Telemo E, Ekwall O. Characterization of Hassall's corpuscles in the human thymus. Manuscript SAHLGRENSKA AKADEMIN INSTITUTIONEN FÖR MEDICIN Göteborg, 2019 Thymic studies Investigations into the effects of childhood thymectomy, and characterization of thymic B cells and Hassall's corpuscles Christina Lundqvist Avdelningen för reumatologi och inflammationsforskning, Institutionen för medicin, Sahlgrenska akademin, Göteborgs universitet Abstract This thesis focuses on the human thymus, a primary lymphoid organ responsible for the maturation of T cells.
    [Show full text]
  • New Insights Into Epididymal Function in Relation to Sperm Maturation
    REPRODUCTIONREVIEW New insights into epididymal function in relation to sperm maturation Jean-Louis Dacheux and Franc¸oise Dacheux UMR INRA-CNRS 7247, 37380 Nouzilly, France Correspondence should be addressed to J-L Dacheux; Email: [email protected] Abstract Testicular spermatozoa acquire fertility only after 1 or 2 weeks of transit through the epididymis. At the end of this several meters long epididymal tubule, the male gamete is able to move, capacitate, migrate through the female tract, bind to the egg membrane and fuse to the oocyte to result in a viable embryo. All these sperm properties are acquired after sequential modifications occurring either at the level of the spermatozoon or in the epididymal surroundings. Over the last few decades, significant increases in the understanding of the composition of the male gamete and its surroundings have resulted from the use of new techniques such as genome sequencing, proteomics combined with high-sensitivity mass spectrometry, and gene-knockout approaches. This review reports and discusses the most relevant new results obtained in different species regarding the various cellular processes occurring at the sperm level, in particular, those related to the development of motility and egg binding during epididymal transit. Reproduction (2014) 147 R27–R42 Introduction sequentially throughout the epididymis. In view of these two parallel events, most investigations have The formation of fertile spermatozoa is the result of involved assessing the relationships between these two spectacular stages of cell differentiation that begin in events and identifying the epididymal signals able to the male gonad and finish in the female tract. The control spermatozoon fertility.
    [Show full text]
  • "Epitope Mapping: B-Cell Epitopes". In: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences
    Epitope Mapping: B-cell Advanced article Epitopes Article Contents . Introduction GE Morris, Wolfson Centre for Inherited Neuromuscular Disease RJAH Orthopaedic Hospital, . What Is a B-cell Epitope? . Epitope Mapping Methods Oswestry, UK and Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK . Applications Immunoglobulin molecules are folded to present a surface structure complementary to doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0002624.pub2 a surface feature on the antigen – the epitope is this feature of the antigen. Epitope mapping is the process of locating the antibody-binding site on the antigen, although the term is also applied more broadly to receptor–ligand interactions unrelated to the immune system. Introduction formed of highly convoluted peptide chains, so that resi- dues that lie close together on the protein surface are often Immunoglobulin molecules are folded in a way that as- far apart in the amino acid sequence (Barlow et al., 1986). sembles sequences from the variable regions of both the Consequently, most epitopes on native, globular proteins heavy and light chains into a surface feature (comprised of are conformation-dependent and they disappear if the up to six complementarity-determining regions (CDRs)) protein is denatured or fragmented. Sometimes, by acci- that is complementary in shape to a surface structure on the dent or design, antibodies are produced against linear antigen. These two surface features, the ‘paratope’ on the (sequential) epitopes that survive denaturation, though antibody and the ‘epitope’ on the antigen, may have a cer- such antibodies usually fail to recognize the native protein. tain amount of flexibility to allow an ‘induced fit’ between The simplest way to find out whether an epitope is confor- them.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Immune System (Children's Book)
    OurOur ImmuneImmune SystemSystem A story for children with primary immunodeficiency diseases Written by IMMUNE DEFICIENCY Sara LeBien FOUNDATION A note from the author The purpose of this book is to help young children who are immune deficient to better understand their immune system. What is a “B-cell,” a “T-cell,” an “immunoglobulin” or “IgG”? They hear doctors use these words, but what do they mean? With cheerful illustrations, Our Immune System explains how a normal immune system works and what treatments may be necessary when the system is deficient. In this second edition, a description of a new treatment has been included. I hope this book will enable these children and their families to explore together the immune system, and that it will help alleviate any confusion or fears they may have. Sara LeBien This book contains general medical information which cannot be applied safely to any individual case. Medical knowledge and practice can change rapidly. Therefore, this book should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice. SECOND EDITION COPYRIGHT 1990, 2007 IMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION Copyright 2007 by Immune Deficiency Foundation, USA. Readers may redistribute this article to other individuals for non-commercial use, provided that the text, html codes, and this notice remain intact and unaltered in any way. Our Immune System may not be resold, reprinted or redistributed for compensation of any kind without prior written permission from Immune Deficiency Foundation. If you have any questions about permission, please contact: Immune Deficiency Foundation, 40 West Chesapeake Avenue, Suite 308, Towson, MD 21204, USA; or by telephone at 1-800-296-4433.
    [Show full text]
  • Immune Regulation by CD52-Expressing CD4 T Cells
    Cellular & Molecular Immunology (2013) 10, 379–382 ß 2013 CSI and USTC. All rights reserved 1672-7681/13 $32.00 www.nature.com/cmi RESEARCH HIGHLIGHT Immune regulation by CD52-expressing CD4 T cells Ban-Hock Toh1, Tin Kyaw1,2, Peter Tipping1 and Alex Bobik2 T-cell regulation by CD52-expressing CD4 T cells appears to operate by two different and possibly synergistic mechanisms. The first is by its release from the cell surface of CD4 T cells that express high levels of CD52 that then binds to the inhibitory sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectins-10 (Siglec-10) receptor to attenuate effector T-cell activation by impairing phosphorylation of T-cell receptor associated lck and zap-70. The second mechanism appears to be by crosslinkage of the CD52 molecules by an as yet unidentified endogenous ligand that is mimicked by a bivalent anti-CD52 antibody that results in their expansion. Cellular & Molecular Immunology (2013) 10, 379–382; doi:10.1038/cmi.2013.35; published online 12 August 2013 he immune system is designed to appears in the affirmative, and includes suppression was lost by cleavage of N- T protect its host from invading players such as IL-10-secreting Tr1 and glycans from CD52-Fc by peptide N- pathogens and yet remain non-reactive TGF-b-secreting Th3. cells. Absence of glycosidase or by removal of sialic acid to self. Immunological homeostasis is surface markers limited the usefulness residues by neuraminidase. Suppression maintained by purging self-reactive lym- of these other regulators. However, the was also blocked by antibody to the phocytes by clonal deletion coupled with recent report that CD49b and lympho- extracellular domain of Siglec-10 and a regulatory population of lymphocytes cyte activation gene-3 are highly and sta- by soluble Siglec-10-Fc.
    [Show full text]
  • Epstein-Barr Virus Epitope-Major Histocompatibility Complex
    University of Massachusetts Medical School eScholarship@UMMS Open Access Articles Open Access Publications by UMMS Authors 2020-03-17 Epstein-Barr Virus Epitope-Major Histocompatibility Complex Interaction Combined with Convergent Recombination Drives Selection of Diverse T Cell Receptor alpha and beta Repertoires Anna Gil University of Massachusetts Medical School Et al. Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Follow this and additional works at: https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs Part of the Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases Commons, Immune System Diseases Commons, Immunology and Infectious Disease Commons, Infectious Disease Commons, Microbiology Commons, Virus Diseases Commons, and the Viruses Commons Repository Citation Gil A, Kamga L, Chirravuri-Venkata R, Aslan N, Clark FG, Ghersi D, Luzuriaga K, Selin LK. (2020). Epstein- Barr Virus Epitope-Major Histocompatibility Complex Interaction Combined with Convergent Recombination Drives Selection of Diverse T Cell Receptor alpha and beta Repertoires. Open Access Articles. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00250-20. Retrieved from https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/ oapubs/4191 Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This material is brought to you by eScholarship@UMMS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Articles by an authorized administrator of eScholarship@UMMS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RESEARCH ARTICLE Host-Microbe Biology crossm Epstein-Barr Virus Epitope–Major Histocompatibility Complex Interaction Combined with Convergent Recombination Drives Downloaded from Selection of Diverse T Cell Receptor ␣ and ␤ Repertoires Anna Gil,a Larisa Kamga,b Ramakanth Chirravuri-Venkata,c Nuray Aslan,a Fransenio Clark,a Dario Ghersi,c Katherine Luzuriaga,b Liisa K.
    [Show full text]
  • Epitope Spreading: Lessons from Autoimmune Skin Diseases
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector REVIEW Epitope Spreading: Lessons From Autoimmune Skin Diseases Lawrence S. Chan,*† Carol J. Vanderlugt,‡ Takashi Hashimoto,§ Takeji Nishikawa,¶ John J. Zone,** Martin M. Black,†† Fenella Wojnarowska,‡‡ Seth R. Stevens,§§ Mei Chen,† Janet A. Fairley,¶¶ David T. Woodley,*† Stephen D. Miller,‡ and Kenneth B. Gordon†‡ *Medicine Service, Section of Dermatology, Lakeside Division, VA Chicago Health Care System, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.; Departments of †Dermatology and ‡Microbiology and Immunology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.; ¶¶Department of Dermatology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan; ¶Department of Dermatology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; **Medicine Service, Section of Dermatology, Salt Lake City VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A.; ††Department of Dermatopathology, Guy’s and St. Thomas Medical and Dental School, London, U.K.; ‡‡Department of Dermatology, The Oxford Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, U.K.; §§Department of Dermatology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A.; ¶¶Department of Dermatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S.A. Autoimmune diseases are initiated when patients develop In experimental autoimmune animal diseases, ‘‘epitope aberrant T and/or B cell responses against self proteins. spreading’’ seems to have significant physiologic impor- These responses
    [Show full text]
  • BCMA-Targeted Immunotherapy for Multiple Myeloma Bo Yu1, Tianbo Jiang2 and Delong Liu2*
    Yu et al. Journal of Hematology & Oncology (2020) 13:125 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-020-00962-7 REVIEW Open Access BCMA-targeted immunotherapy for multiple myeloma Bo Yu1, Tianbo Jiang2 and Delong Liu2* Abstract B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is a novel treatment target for multiple myeloma (MM) due to its highly selective expression in malignant plasma cells (PCs). Multiple BCMA-targeted therapeutics, including antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, and bispecific T cell engagers (BiTE), have achieved remarkable clinical response in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. Belantamab mafodotin-blmf (GSK2857916), a BCMA-targeted ADC, has just been approved for highly refractory MM. In this article, we summarized the molecular and physiological properties of BCMA as well as BCMA-targeted immunotherapeutic agents in different stages of clinical development. Keywords: B cell maturation antigen, BCMA, Belantamab mafodotin, CAR-T, Antibody-drug conjugate, Bispecific T cell engager Introduction B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) Recent advances in novel therapeutics such as prote- BCMA is encoded by a 2.92-kb TNFRSF17 gene located asome inhibitors (PI) and immunomodulatory drugs on the short arm of chromosome 16 (16p13.13) and (IMiD) have significantly improved the treatment out- composed of 3 exons separated by 2 introns (Fig. 1). comes in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) [1–8]. BCMA is a 184 amino acid and 20.2-kDa type III trans- However, most MM patients eventually relapse due to membrane glycoprotein, with the extracellular N the development of drug resistance [9]. In addition, terminus containing a conserved motif of 6 cysteines many of the current popular target antigens, such as [18–21].
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Natural Antibodies
    PERSPECTIVE published: 26 July 2017 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00872 Defining Natural Antibodies Nichol E. Holodick1*, Nely Rodríguez-Zhurbenko2 and Ana María Hernández2* 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Center for Immunobiology, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI, United States, 2 Natural Antibodies Group, Tumor Immunology Division, Center of Molecular Immunology, Havana, Cuba The traditional definition of natural antibodies (NAbs) states that these antibodies are present prior to the body encountering cognate antigen, providing a first line of defense against infection thereby, allowing time for a specific antibody response to be mounted. The literature has a seemingly common definition of NAbs; however, as our knowledge of antibodies and B cells is refined, re-evaluation of the common definition of NAbs may be required. Defining NAbs becomes important as the function of NAb production is used to define B cell subsets (1) and as these important molecules are shown to play numerous roles in the immune system (Figure 1). Herein, we aim to briefly summarize our current knowledge of NAbs in the context of initiating a discussion within the field of how such an important and multifaceted group of molecules should be defined. Edited by: Keywords: natural antibody, antibodies, natural antibody repertoire, B-1 cells, B cell subsets, B cells Harry W. Schroeder, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States NATURAL ANTIBODY (NAb) PRODUCING CELLS Reviewed by: Andre M. Vale, Both murine and human NAbs have been discussed in detail since the late 1960s (2, 3); however, Federal University of Rio cells producing NAbs were not identified until 1983 in the murine system (4, 5).
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting BAFF and APRIL in Systemic Lupus Erythemathosis a Comparison of Trials of Three BAFF/APRIL Inhibitors
    Targeting BAFF and APRIL in Systemic Lupus Erythemathosis A comparison of trials of three BAFF/APRIL inhibitors Figure 1: B-cell targeting therapies to treat systemic lupus erythemathosis (1) Abstract: Systemic Lupus Erythemathosis (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease. Diagnosis and prognosis are difficult and have a lot of confounders. Progress of the disease is thus followed by a number of measures, such as damage indices like SELENA/SLEDAI and BILAG, B-cell numbers, immunoglobulin levels, in particular autoantibodies such as anti-dsDNA antibodies, and complement C3 and C4 levels. B-cell proliferation and activation are overstimulated in SLE, particularly through the BAFF/APRIL stimulated pathways. A number of BAFF/APRIL targeting biologicals have been approved for use in treatment of SLE or are currently in clinical trials. Three of these are highlighted here: Belimumab, Blisibimod and Atacicept. Belimumab, a fully humanized anti-BAFF antibody, is already approved by the USFDA. In clinical studies it has been show to lower the damage index, B-cell numbers and immunoglobulin levels, it increases complement levels and may reduce the need for steroids. Blisibimod, a synthetic peptibody, is in stage II trials. Like Belimumab, Blisbimod lowers the damage index and B-cell numbers, increases complement levels and may reduce the need for steroids. Ataticept, a fusion protein, is in stage III trials. Atacicept also lowers the damage index, B-cell numbers and immunoglobulin levels, increases complement and may reduce the need for steroids. The differences are relatively small and to determine the most promising of these treatments close attention has to be paid to the data from trials.
    [Show full text]
  • Med-Pathway Zoom Workshop
    MCAT Immunology Dr. Phillip Carpenter medpathwaymcat Med-pathway AAMC MCAT Content Outline: Immunology Category 1A: Structure/Function of Proteins/AA Immune System Category 3B: Organ Systems Innate vs. Adaptive Immunity T and B Lymphocytes Macrophages & Phagocytes Tissue-Bone marrow, Spleen, Thymus, Lymph nodes Antigen and Antibody Antigen Presentation Clonal Selection Antigen-Antibody recognition Structure of antibody molecule Self vs. Non-self, Autoimmune Diseases Major Histocompatibility Complex Lab Techniques: ELISA & Western Blotting Hematopoiesis Creates Immune Cells Self vs. Non-self Innate vs Adaptive Innate Immunity Physical Barriers: Skin, mucous membranes, pH Inflammatory mediators: Complement, Cytokines, Prostaglandins Cellular Components: Phagocytes-Neutrophils, Eosinophils, Basophils, Mast Cells Antigen Presenting Cells-Monocytes, Macrophages, Dendritic Cells Adaptive (Acquired) Immunity Composed of B and T lymphocytes: Activated by Innate Immunity B cells: Express B cell receptor and secrete antibodies as plasma cells T cells: Mature in thymus, express TCR surface receptor; Activated by Antigen Presenting Cells (APCs) Direct Immune response (The Ringleaders of immune system) Major Lymphoid Organs TYPE SITE FUNCTION Fetal production of Liver 1° lymphoid cells Hematopoietic production of 1° Bone marrow myeloid and lymphoid cells Receives bone marrow T 1° Thymus cells; site where self is selected from non-self Lymph nodes 2° Sites of antigen activation Spleen of lymphocytes; clearance Macrophages (Sentinel Cells) Pattern Recognition
    [Show full text]