<<

STATE-OF-THE-ART REVIEW Editor: Bernard A. Cohen, M.D. Pediatric Vol. 24 No. 5 465–473, 2007

Hidradenitis Suppurativa ( inversa): Management of a Recalcitrant Disease

Joseph Lam, M.D.,* Andrew C. Krakowski, M.D.,* and Sheila F. Friedlander, M.D.

*Rady Children’s Hospital, University of California, Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine (Dermatology), San Diego School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California

Abstract: suppurativa is a chronic relapsing disorder of follicular occlusion that is often recalcitrant to therapy. Topical and systemic antibiotics, hormonal therapies, oral , immunosuppressant agents, and surgical treatment are some of the therapeutic alternatives used for this often recalcitrant and frequently troublesome disorder. This article reviews the pathophysiology of , an evidence-based analy- sis of standard treatments, and recent advances in the therapy of this disorder.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a disease of the (2,3), with the inflammation of apocrine glands that oc- apocrine gland-bearing areas of the body that commonly curs likely representing a secondary phenomenon affects the intertriginous areas. Although it may initially resulting from follicular plugging (3). It is now believed present in a mild form, recurrent abscesses with the that HS is primarily an inflammatory disorder of the hair development of sinus tracts and scarring generally en- follicle and, therefore, is included in the follicular occlu- sues. Rather than a distinct disease entity, it may repre- sion tetrad along with , dissecting cellu- sent the severe end of a spectrum of disease that includes litis, and pilonidal sinuses (4) (Table 1). As well, the acne. Hidradenitis suppurativa has a prevalence estimate ‘‘suppurativa’’ may be inappropriate, as HS is likely not of 1:300 (1). Not surprisingly, HS may have a severe initiated by infection. A more appropriate term may be deleterious psychosocial impact on the patient, due to ‘‘acne inversa,’’ a label preferred by some experts (4,5). both its chronic nature and lack of response to standard therapeutic options. Side effects of therapy often nega- Histopathology of the Disease tively impact on the patient’s well-being. In a review in 2005 by Sellheyer and Krahl (4), serial histologic specimens show progression from follicular PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND NATURAL and formation to rupture of the HISTORY follicular infundibulum, with resultant inflammation of The term hidradenitis suppurativa derives from the the surrounding dermis. Over time, a granulomatous Greek words hidros for sweat and adne for gland. infiltrate is seen, with further local inflammation causing However, this term may be a misnomer, as it appears that abscess formation and apocrinitis as the inflammation HS may not be a primary disorder of the apocrine glands spreads. Of note, early specimens only show the follicular

Address correspondence to Dr. Sheila Fallon Friedlander, Clinical Professor, 8010 Frost Street, Suite 602, San Diego, CA 92123, or e-mail: [email protected].

DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2007.00544.x

2007 The Authors. Journal compilation 2007 Blackwell Publishing, Inc. 465 466 Pediatric Dermatology Vol. 24 No. 5 September ⁄ October 2007

TABLE 1. Follicular Occlusion Tetrad

Dissecting cellulitis of the scalp Acne conglobata Hidradenitis suppurativa (acne inversa) Pilonidal sinus occlusion with sparing of the apocrine glands. The au- thors present a convincing argument for apocrinitis as a secondary effect caused by extension of the inflammatory process.

Clinical Presentation Clinically, HS usually presents as tender subcutaneous nodules in the intertriginous areas, which include the axillae, inguinal, anogenital, and mammary areas. It has been noted in association with Crohn disease (6,7), Dowling-Degos disease (8–10), and arthropathy (11,12). Although the exact pathophysiologic mechanisms are still unknown, genetics (13–15), hormones (16–18), obesity (18), bacterial infection (19), and smoking (20) Figure 1. A patient with mild hidradenitis suppurativa. may play a role. With time, the follicular occlusion leads to dilatation and rupture of the structure, which sets off a chain of events including inflammation, abscess forma- tion and, in established disease, sinus tract formation, which are classically resistant to treatment. Squamous cell carcinoma is a rare complication of chronic, severe, hidradenitis suppurativa (21–23).

STAGING OF HIDRADENITIS SUPPURATIVA Mild HS is usually noted early in the course of the dis- ease, and consists of solitary nodules with minimal pain and no abscess formation (Fig. 1). Moderate HS can be classified as multiple recurrent nodules affecting the pa- tient’s daily activities due to pain, discharge or drainage. Abscess formation occurs at this stage (Fig. 2). Severe HS develops late in the course of the disease and involves Figure 2. A patient with moderate hidradenitis suppurativa. diffuse abscess formation with chronic draining sinus tracts. Chronic inflammation is evident in multiple areas depilation, and deodorants. Warm compresses and top- of scarring (Fig. 3). Fortunately, not all patients progress ical antiseptic or antibacterial soaps can be used for in- to severe disease. flamed . Although no controlled trials of these general measures have occurred, the consensus among MEDICAL TREATMENT practitioners is that general preventative measures can help with the symptoms of mild HS. General First line therapy consists of conservative management, Antibiotics which is subsequently often used in conjunction with other treatment modalities. Initial measures include Conservative measures may not be enough to control the cessation of smoking, weight loss, and avoidance of disease and systemic and ⁄or topical antibiotics can be irritation in the affected area. Patients should wear loose- added to the treatment regime. Topical clindamycin (24) fitting cotton clothing and avoid heat, humidity, shaving, is a good choice for initial therapy. A double-blind Lam et al: Hidradenitis Suppurativa Management 467

two agents best studied are cyproterone acetate and fin- asteride. In a study, using 50 lgofethinyloestra- diol ⁄50 mg of cyproterone acetate daily, 50% of the women showed improvement, with approximately 30% having complete remission for 18 months (27). Another report demonstrated clinical control using 100 mg⁄day of cyproterone acetate in four women with long-standing HS (28); unfortunately this drug is not available in the US due to its potential hepatotoxicity (29–31) and theo- retical concerns regarding feminization of male fetuses (33,34). Data are lacking on the use of other oral contra- ceptives in HS, and the rationale for their use is largely based on anecdotal reports and clinical data confirming that oral contraceptives are useful in the treatment of acne. Recently, a few case series demonstrated clinical improvement in both male and female HS patients fol- lowing the use of finasteride, a selective inhibitor of type-II 5-a-reducatase (34,35). However, finasteride is associated with a number of side-effects, including teratogenicity, decreased libido, erectile dysfunction, decreased ejaculatory volume, gynecomastia, and breast enlargement in women (36). Nonetheless, because of its rapid and almost complete elimination, some have sug- Figure 3. A patient with severe hidradenitis suppurativa. gested that it may be safer than retinoids for women of childbearing age (34). placebo controlled study showed that topical clindamy- cin for 3 months resulted in significant improvement, Oral Retinoids and a recent double-blind trial showed that topical clin- damycin was just as efficacious as systemic tetracycline. is a useful medication in the treatment of (25). However, concern regarding the emergence of acne and has been used in HS as well. However, despite resistant bacteria following prolonged therapy is a rea- earlier reports of success with isotretinoin (37,38), a re- sonable factor impacting on treatment plans. cent retrospective study of 68 patients showed that less Of the systemic antibiotics, tetracycline, mino- than a quarter (23.5%) had clearing with a 4–6 month cycline, and erythromycin are among those commonly course of low-dose isotretinoin and only 16.2% showed used for chronic treatment of HS. Most information maintenance of improvement on follow-up (39). In this comes from anecdotal evidence and case reports. study, the mean daily dose was 0.56 mg ⁄kg ⁄day. No However, a recent small retrospective study showed large studies with standard doses of isotretinoin have remission of HS using a 10-week course of combina- been performed. However, success with acitretin and tion 300 mg of clindamycin twice daily and 300 mg of etretinate, including in patients who have failed courses rifampicin twice daily (26). In this study, the major of isotretinoin, has been reported (40–42). side-effect was , which necessitated discontin- uation of the medication in four patients. The Dapsone remaining 10 patients were maintained in remission up until the time of the report, for a symptom-free Dapsone has been found to be helpful in a small number duration of 1 to 4 years. of HS patients and is a reasonable therapeutic alternative for recalcitrant disease (43). In a recent series of five pa- tients, clinical improvement was noted in all five within 4 Hormonal to 12 weeks, utilizing doses between 25 and 150 mg daily Although most patients with HS have normal androgen (44). No significant adverse effects were noted. As with all profiles, improvement of HS with the use of anti- patients on dapsone, it is important to monitor the androgens has been reported. The mechanism may be hemoglobin levels and to screen for glucose-6-phospha- due to altered end-organ sensitivity to androgens. The tase deficiency. 468 Pediatric Dermatology Vol. 24 No. 5 September ⁄ October 2007

Immunosuppressive Therapy SURGICAL TREATMENT Systemic and intralesional corticosteroids may be used Although medical treatments are often used in early for their nonspecific anti-inflammatory effects. Sys- stages of HS, once scarring develops, surgical interven- temic steroids carry with them a higher risk of side tions become the preferred mode of treatment. The goal effects including , cushingoid features, in surgery is to remove the scarred tracts and draining and adrenal axis suppression. Although initial control abscesses. Although the best mode of surgical therapy may occur, many patients will flare as steroid therapy has yet to be determined, consensus has been reached is tapered or discontinued. Intralesional steroids are of regarding several general principles. First, incision and benefit to patients in the short term, although evidence drainage of an inflammatory is of limited value is lacking to support this as a long-term form of dis- and should be avoided (19,67). However, marsupiali- ease control. A total of four patients have been zation of recurrent lesions may aid with local control reported, documenting improvement with cyclosporin (68). Second, the surgical literature suggests that surgical (45–47).Onemustkeepinmindtherisk–benefitratio removal of the involved tissue is the treatment of choice when using this drug, and long-term use is probably (69–71). However, depending on the extent of disease not warranted in most instances, given the risks of involvement, this may not be feasible. Unfortunately hypertension and renal impairmentthatincreasewith recurrences happen even following wide surgical exci- prolonged treatment. sion. A recent study showed 100% recurrence after drainage, 42.8% after limited, and 27% after radical excision (67). As well, a series of 82 patients with 118 Biologics radical excisions showed high recurrence rates for Considerable interest exists in the possible benefits of biologic agents for HS. The most experience has accrued with infliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody with TABLE 2. Stepwise Approach to Management of HS high affinity for tumor necrosis factor-alpha. The initial Consider related or associated diseases report involved a patient with Crohn disease and axillary Crohn (especially if perineal disease), acne conglobata, dissecting HSwhoreceivedinfliximabfor her Crohn disease (48). , pilonidal sinus, arthropathy, Dowling-Degos The HS showed significant improvement after one dose disease, hyperandrogenism General measures and cleared completely after the second dose. Subse- Education and counseling quently, nine patients with HS who responded to inflix- Avoid irritation (Deodorant, razor shaving, depilation, loose imab have been reported (49–53). Success with clothing, cotton underwear, losing weight, avoid heat and humidity) etanercept and adalimumab has also been described Cessation of smoking (54,55). However, treatment with any of these agents Warm compresses carries significant risks. Side effects include infusion Topical antiseptic Antibacterial soap ⁄ wash reactions, serum-sickness reaction, reactivation of latent First-line agents (mild–moderate disease) tuberculosis (TB), immunosuppression, exacerbation of Topical clindamycin; if ineffective, consider demyelinating diseases, -like reactions, and the Oral clindamycin and rifampin Oral tetracycline, minocycline, doxyxycline or erythromycin potential development of late lymphomas (56–58). Intralesional corticosteroids A fatal occurrence of epidermoid carcinoma has been Oral contraceptives reported following treatment with infliximab (59). Second-line agents (recalcitrant or severe disease) Systemic retinoids (isotretinoin, acitretin) Although the use of biologics is promising, the decision Dapsone must be made with serious consideration for the potential Finasteride severe side effects. Biologic therapy (primarily infliximab) Cyproterone acetate (if available) Surgical excision Unproven therapies Other Medical Treatments Cryotherapy Methotrexate Other modalities that have been used for HS include Botulinum toxin A radiotherapy (60), ALA-PDT (61,62), botulinum toxin Radiotherapy A (63), granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating ALA-PDT Cyclosporin factor (GM-CSF) (64), cryotherapy (65), and metho- GM-CSF trexate (66). Unfortunately the data supporting the use of CO2 laser these agents consist of isolated case reports with atten- HS, hidradenitis suppurativa; GM-CSF, granulocyte–macrophage dant selection bias. colony-stimulating factor. Lam et al: Hidradenitis Suppurativa Management 469 inguinoperineal and submammary disease (72). A large designed (Table 2). Unfortunately, no level-1 high- study of 106 patients and 143 excisions showed a recur- quality data from appropriately designed trials of sig- rence rate of almost 70% following primary closure in nificant size are available, and recommendations are patients with mild to severe HS (73). However, all vari- therefore limited by this shortcoming. eties of flaps and grafts have been used for more extensive For the purposes of examining the levels of evidence, diseasewithnomajorrecurrences(70). three methods for evaluating and grading were consid- Various modalities of surgery have been used, from ered. The first method was that of the Oxford Centre for the traditional scalpel to the use of CO2 laser (74–78). Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence (http:// While surgical excision is definitely a treatment option www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp). We found this for chronic and intractable disease, it carries the risk of method quite extensive and comprehensive. The advan- additional scarring. Although curative surgery is possi- tages were the strict definitions of each category and the ble, the chance of recurrence is a real and potential out- inclusion of grades of recommendation. However, this come. Other complications include contractures and method has drawbacks. The level of complexity makes functional loss or limitation of mobility, secondary to the system difficult to access for the practitioner (i.e., fibrosis and scarring (79). level-1 evidence is split into a, b, or c depending on fur- ther qualifications to the evidence). As well, there is no weight placed on clinically relevant outcome versus STEPWISE APPROACH TO purely numerical outcomes (i.e., reduction in deaths MANAGEMENT OF HS versus lowering of numbers). For this reason, In light of our current understanding of this disease, and an attempt was made to identify another method of the quality of evidence in support of the various therapies evaluation. A second method considered was that of the available, a stepwise approach to management has been US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF).

TABLE 3. Levels of Evidence for Select Medications in the Treatment of HS

Quality of Grade of Agent Dose evidence recommendation

Topical antibiotics Clindamycin 1% solution 2 B Systemic antibiotics Clindamycin ⁄ Rifampin Clindamycin 300 bid 2B Rifampin 300 bid for 12 wks Other antibiotics Variable 3 C Hormonal therapy Cyproterone 100 mg ⁄ d2B Other oral contraceptives Variable 3 C Finasteride 5 mg ⁄ day 3 C Oral retinoids Isotretinoin Variable (low dose, 0.7–1.2 mg ⁄ kg ⁄ day) 3 C Acitretin Variable 3 C Immunosuppressants Corticosteroids (intralesional) Variable 3 C Cyclosporin 2–4.5 mg ⁄ kg ⁄ day 3 C Biologics Infliximab 5 mg ⁄ kg repeated at 2 wks and 6 wks 3 C Etanercept 25 mg s.c. twice weekly 3 C Adalimumab 40 mg s.c. every other week 3 C Other (medical) Dapsone 25–150 mg ⁄ day 3 C ALA-PDT N ⁄ A3C MTX 12.5–15 mg weekly 3 C Radiotherapy N ⁄ A3C Botox 250 U Dysport as for 3 C GM-CSF 450 lg in 10 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution 3 C Cryotherapy N ⁄ A3C Surgical therapy Local excision N ⁄ A3C Radical excision N ⁄ A3C CO laser N ⁄ A3C HS, hidradenitis suppurativa; GM-CSF, granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor. 470 Pediatric Dermatology Vol. 24 No. 5 September ⁄ October 2007

TABLE 4. Side-Effect Profile of Select Medications in the Treatment of HS

Medication Side-effect profile

Clindamycin and rifampin Discoloration of body fluids (rifampin), pseudomembranous colitis (clindamycin), selection of resistant organisms, vulvovaginal candidiasis Finasteride Teratogenicity, decreased libido, erectile dysfunction and gynecomastia (males), breast enlargement (females) Isotretinoin Mood lability, pseudotumor cerebri, hypertriglyceridemia, pancreatitis, hepatic transaminitis, myalgias, xerosis Infliximab Serum sickness reaction, reactivation of latent tuberculosis, immunosuppression, exacerbation of demyelinating diseases, lupus-like reactions, latent lymphoma (potential) Dapsone Hemolytic anemia, methemoglobinemia, blood dyscrasias, hepatitis, peripheral neuropathy, lupus-like reaction, mood lability, erythema multiforme Cryotherapy Local pain, scarring, prolonged healing time, posttreatment infection Methotrexate Myelosuppression, hepatotixicity, nausea, nephropathy, interstitial pneumonitis Botulinum toxin A Pain at infection site Cyclosporine Hypertension, pancreatitis, blood dyscrasias, immunosuppression, hepatotoxicity, hypomagnesemia, , gingival hyperplasia, , nephrotoxicity ALA-PDT Local pain and irritation GM-CSF Transaminitie, fluid retention, venous , ‘first dose’ reaction (fever, , tachycardia, rigors, flushing, nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia) Radiotherapy Carcinogenic risk, myelosuppression HS, hidradenitis suppurativa; GM-CSF, granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

Although this is also an excellent system to stratify currently exist regarding the optimal treatment for this quality of evidence and contains categories of recom- debilitating and frequently frustrating disease. mendations, it did not distinguish between numerical and clinically relevant outcomes. In addition, the system is REFERENCES designed for populations and for public health profes- sionals, and not for individual studies. 1. Jemec GB, Heidenheim M, Nielsen NH. The prevalence of For these reasons, we elected to use the system pro- hidradenitis suppuritiva and its potential precursor lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;35:191–194. posed by Ebell et al (80) (Appendix 1) which includes the 2. Jemec GB, Hansen U. of hidradenitis suppura- benefits of an easy-to-use system with clinical and pa- tiva. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;34:994–999. tient-oriented recommendations. The findings of our 3. Yu CC, Cook MG. Hidradenitis suppurativa: a disease of analysis of the data on treatments for HS are summarized follicular epithelium, rather than apocrine glands. Br J in Table 3. Dermatol 1990;122:763–769. 4. Sellheyer K, Krahl D. ‘‘Hidradenitis suppurativa’’ is acne inversa! An appeal to (finally) abandon a misnomer. Int J CONCLUSION Dermatol 2005;44:535–540. 5. Jansen I, Altmeyer P, Piewig G. Acne inversa (alias Hidradenitis suppurativa is a complex and recurrent hidradenitis suppurativa). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol disease that can be socially and medically debilitating. 2001;15:532–540. 6. Goischke HK, Ochsendorf FR. Acne inversa in Crohn’s Although initially thought to be a disease of the apocrine disease. Z Gastroenterol 2001;39:965–969. glands, it is now clear that the primary pathogenic event 7. Ostlere LS, Langtry JA, Mortimer PS et al. Hidradenitis is follicular occlusion, with subsequent inflammation. suppurativa in Crohn’s disease. Br J Dermatol A number of treatment options are available for HS, 1991;125:384–386. including general measures, topical and systemic antibi- 8. Bedlow AJ, Mortimer PS. Dowling-Degos disease associ- ated with hidradenitis suppurativa. Clin Exp Dermatol otics, hormonal treatments, systemic retinoids, local and 1996;21:305–306. systemic immunosuppressants, as well as biologic agents. 9. Loo WJ, Rytina E, Todd PM. Hidradenitis suppurativa, The benefits of these therapies must be weighed against Dowling-Degos and multiple epidermal : a new their side effects (Table 4). It must also be kept in mind follicular occlusion triad. Clin Exp Dermatol that the disease is characterized by recurrences regardless 2004;29:622–624. 10. Dixit R, George R, Jacob M et al. Dowling-Degos disease, of medical treatment modality used. Surgical treatment is hidradenitis suppurativa and arthritis in mother and another therapeutic option, particularly in later-stage daughter. Clin Exp Dermatol 2006;31:454–456. disease characterized by sinus tract and fistula formation. 11. Leybishkis B, Fasseas P, Ryan KF et al. Hidradenitis Large, randomized, controlled studies would be helpful suppurativa and acne conglobata associated with spond- in identifying best treatment options, as no level-1 data yloarthropathy. Am J Med Sci 2001;321:195–197. Lam et al: Hidradenitis Suppurativa Management 471

12. Thein M, Hogarth MB, Acland K. Seronegative arthritis during the pre- and postimplantation period of mouse associated with the follicular occlusion triad. Clin Exp embryos. I.. Teratology 1982;25:27–36. Dermatol 2004;29:550–552. 33. Eibs HG, Spielmann H, Jacob-Muller U et al. Terato- 13. Gao M, Wang PG, Cui Y et al. Inversa acne (hidradenitis genic effects of cyproterone acetate and medroxypro- suppurativa): a case report and identification of the locus at gesterone treatment during the pre- and postimplantation chromosome 1p21.1-1q25.3. J Invest Dermatol period of mouse embryos. II. Cyproterone acetate 2006;126:1302–1306. and medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment before 14. Von Der Werth JM, Williams HC, Raeburn JA. The implantation in vivo and in vitro. Teratology clinical genetics of hidradenitis suppurativa revisited. Br J 1982;25:291–299. Dermatol 2000;142:947–953. 34. Joseph MA, Jayaseelan E, Ganapathi B et al. Hidradenitis 15. Fitzsimmons JS, Guilbert PR, Fitzsimmons EM. Evidence suppurativa treated with finasteride. J Dermatolog Treat of genetic factors in hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J 2005;16:75–78. Dermatol 1985;113:1–8. 35. Farrell AM, Randall VA, Vafaee T et al. Finasteride as a 16. Ebling FJ. Hidradenitis suppurativa: an androgen-depen- therapy for hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol dent disorder. Br J Dermatol 1986;115:259–262. 1999;141:1138–1139. 17. Palmer RA, Keefe M. Early-onset hidradenitis suppurati- 36. Roberts JL, Fiedler V, Imperato-McGinley J et al. Clinical va. Clin Exp Dermatol 2001;26:501–503. dose ranging studies with finasteride, a type 2 5alpha- 18. Harrison BJ, Read GF, Hughes LE. Endocrine basis for reductase inhibitor, in men with male pattern . the clinical presentation of hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;41:555–563. Surg 1988;75:972–975. 37. Dicken CH, Powell ST, Spear KL. Evaluation of isotre- 19. Wiseman MC. Hidradenitis suppurativa: a review. Der- tinoin treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. J Am Acad matol Ther 2004;17:50–54. Dermatol 1984;11:500–502. 20. Konig A, Lehmann C, Rompel R et al. Cigarette smoking 38. Brown CF, Gallup DG, Brown VM. Hidradenitis suppu- as a triggering factor of hidradenitis suppurativa. Derma- rativa of the anogenital region: response to isotretinoin. tology 1999;198:261–264. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:12–15. 21. Short KA, Kalu G, Mortimer PS et al. Vulval squamous 39. Boer J, van Gemert MJ. Long-term results of isotretinoin cell carcinoma arising in chronic hidradenitis suppurativa. in the treatment of 68 patients with hidradenitis suppura- Clin Exp Dermatol 2005;30:481–483. tiva. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;40:73–76. 22. Rosenzweig LB, Brett AS, Lefaivre JF et al. Hidradenitis 40. Scheman AJ. Nodulocystic acne and hidradenitis suppu- suppurativa complicated by squamous cell carcinoma rativa treated with acitretin: a case report. Cutis and paraneoplastic neuropathy. Am J Med Sci 2005;329: 2002;69:287–288. 150–152. 41. Hogan DJ, Light MJ. Successful treatment of hidradenitis 23. Altunay IK, Gokdemir G, Kurt A et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa with acitretin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988;19 suppurativa and squamous cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg (2 Pt 1):355–356. 2002;28:88–90. 42. Chow ET, Mortimer PS. Successful treatment of hidrade- 24. Clemmensen OJ. Topical treatment of hidradenitis nitis suppurativa and retroauricular acne with etretinate. suppurativa with clindamycin. Int J Dermatol 1983;22: Br J Dermatol 1992;126:415. 325–328. 43. Hofer T, Itin PH. Acne inversa: a dapsone-sensitive 25. Jemec GB, Wendelboe P. Topical clindamycin versus dermatosis. Hautarzt 2001;52(10 Pt 2):989–992. systemic tetracycline in the treatment of hidradenitis 44. Kaur MR, Lewis HM. Hidradenitis suppurativa treated suppurativa. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;39:971–974. with dapsone: A case series of five patients. J Dermatolog 26. Mendonca CO, Griffiths CE. Clindamycin and rifampicin Treat 2006;17:211–213. combination therapy for hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J 45. Rose RF, Goodfield MJ, Clark SM. Treatment of Dermatol 2006;154:977–978. recalcitrant hidradenitis suppurativa with oral ciclosporin. 27. Mortimer PS, Dawber RP, Gales MA et al. A double- Clin Exp Dermatol 2006;31:154–155. blind controlled cross-over trial of cyproterone acetate in 46. Buckley DA, Rogers S. Cyclosporin-responsive hidrade- females with hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol nitis suppurativa. J R Soc Med 1995;88:289P–290P. 1986;115:263–268. 47. Gupta AK, Ellis CN, Nickoloff BJ et al. Oral cyclosporine 28. Sawers RS, Randall VA, Ebling FJ. Control of hidradenitis in the treatment of inflammatory and noninflammatory suppurativa in women using combined antiandrogen dermatoses. A clinical and immunopathologic analysis. (cyproterone acetate) and oestrogen therapy. Br J Derma- Arch Dermatol 1990;126:339–350. tol 1986;115:269–274. 48. Martinez F, Nos P, Benlloch S et al. Hidradenitis suppu- 29. Levesque H, Trivalle C, Manchon ND et al. Fulminant rativa and Crohn’s disease: response to treatment with hepatitis due to cyproterone acetate. Lancet 1989;1: infliximab. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2001;7:323–326. 215–221. 49. Rosi YL, Lowe L, Kang S. Treatment of hidradenitis 30. Murphy BJ, Collins BJ. Severe hepatitis and liver failure suppurativa with infliximab in a patient with Crohn’s induced by cyproterone acetate. Aust N Z J Med disease. J Dermatolog Treat 2005;16:58–61. 1996;26:724. 50. Adams DR, Gordon KB, Devenyi AG et al. Severe 31. Kacar S, Akdogan M, Kosar Y et al. Estrogen and hidradenitis suppurativa treated with infliximab infusion. cyproterone acetate combination-induced autoimmune Arch Dermatol 2003;139:1540–1542. hepatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2002;35:98–100. 51. Sullivan TP, Welsh E, Kerdel FA et al. Infliximab for 32. Eibs HG, Spielmann H, Hagele M. Teratogenic effects of hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol 2003;149: cyproterone acetate and medroxyprogesterone treatment 1046–1049. 472 Pediatric Dermatology Vol. 24 No. 5 September ⁄ October 2007

52. Lebwohl B, Sapadin AN. Infliximab for the treatment of 72. Harrison BJ, Mudge M, Hughes LE. Recurrence after hidradenitis suppurativa. J Am Acad Dermatol surgical treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. Br Med J 2003;49(Suppl. 5):S275–S276. (Clin Res Ed) 1987;21:294. 53. Katsanos KH, Christodoulou DK, Tsianos EV. Axillary 73. Rompel R, Petres J. Long-term results of wide surgical hidradenitis suppurativa successfully treated with inflix- excision in 106 patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. imab in a Crohn’s disease patient. Am J Gastroenterol Dermatol Surg 2000;26:638–643. 2002;97:2155–2156. 74. Lapins J, Sartorius K, Emtestam L. Scanner-assisted 54. Scheinfeld N. Treatment of coincident seronegative arthri- carbon dioxide laser surgery: a retrospective follow-up tis and hidradentis supprativa with adalimumab. J Am study of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. J Am Acad Acad Dermatol 2006;55:163–164. Dermatol 2002;47:280–285. 55. Cusack C, Buckley C. Etanercept: effective in the manage- 75. Finley EM, Ratz JL. Treatment of hidradenitis suppu- ment of hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol rativa with carbon dioxide laser excision and 2006;154:726–729. second-intention healing. J Am Acad Dermatol 56. Weinberg JM. An overview of infliximab, etanercept, 1996;34:465–469. efalizumab, and alefacept as biologic therapy for psoriasis. 76. Lapins J, Marcusson JA, Emtestam L. Surgical treatment Clin Ther 2003;25:2487–2505. of chronic hidradenitis suppurativa: CO2 laser stripping- 57. Williams JD, Griffiths CE. Cytokine blocking agents in secondary intention technique. Br J Dermatol dermatology. Clin Exp Dermatol 2002;27:585–590. 1994;131:551–556. 58. Sauder DN, Mamelak AJ. Understanding the new clinical 77. Bratschi HU, Altermatt HJ, Dreher E. Therapy of landscape for psoriasis: a comparative review of biologics. suppurative hidradenitis using the CO2-laser. Case report J Cutan Med Surg 2004;8:205–212. and literature review. Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax 59. Maalouf E, Faye O, Poli F et al. Fatal epidermoid 1993;82:941–945. carcinoma in hidradenitis suppurativa following treatment 78. Dalrymple JC, Monaghan JM. Treatment of hidradenitis with infliximab. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2006;133(5 Pt suppurativa with the carbon dioxide laser. Br J Surg 1):473–474. 1987;74:420. 60. Frohlich D, Baaske D, Glatzel M. Radiotherapy of 79. Slade DE, Powell BW, Mortimer PS. Hidradenitis suppu- hidradenitis suppurativa—still valid today? Strahlenther rativa: pathogenesis and management. Br J Plast Surg Onkol 2000;176:286–289. 2003;56:451–461. 61. Strauss RM, Pollock B, Stables GI et al. Photodynamic 80. Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD et al. Strength of recom- therapy using aminolaevulinic acid does not lead to clinical mendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered improvement in hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. 2005;152:803–804. Am Fam Physician 2004;69:548–556. 62. Gold M, Bridges TM, Bradshaw VL et al. ALA-PDT and blue light therapy for hidradenitis suppurativa. J Drugs Dermatol 2004;3(Suppl. 1):S32–S35. APPENDIX 1: REFERENCES FOR QUALITY OF 63. O’Reilly DJ, Pleat JM, Richards AM. Treatment of EVIDENCE AND GRADING OF RECOMMEN- hidradenitis suppurativa with botulinum toxin A. Plast DATIONS Reconstr Surg 2005;116:1575–1576. 64. Sharon-Guidetti A, Ziv Y, Kummer E et al. Granulocyte- macrophage colony-stimulating factor for perianal hid- radenitis suppurativa: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT) 2006;49:682–684. Study quality Definition (for treatment) Level 1 SR ⁄ meta-analysis of RCT with 65. Bong JL, Shalders K, Saihan E. Treatment of persistent consistent findings painful nodules of hidradenitis suppurativa with cryother- High-quality individual RCT* apy. Clin Exp Dermatol 2003;28:241–244. All-or-none study 66. Jemec GB. Methotrexate is of limited value in the Level 2 SR ⁄ meta-analysis of lower quality treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. Clin Exp Dermatol clinical trials or of studies with 2002;27:528–529. inconsistent findings 67. Ritz JP, Runkel N, Haier J et al. Extent of surgery and Lower quality individual RCT* recurrence rate of hidradenitis suppurativa. Int J Colo- Cohort study rectal Dis 1998;13:164–168. Case-control study Level 3 Consensus guidelines, 68. Brown SC, Kazzazi N, Lord PH. Surgical treatment of extrapolations from bench perineal hidradenitis suppurativa with special reference to research, usual practice, opinion, recognition of the perianal form. Br J Surg 1986;73: disease-oriented evidence 978–980. (intermediate or physiologic 69. Weyandt G. Surgical management of acne inversa. outcomes only), or case series for Hautarzt 2005;56:1033–1039. studies of diagnosis, treatment, 70. Mandal A, Watson J. Experience with different treatment prevention, or screening modules in hidradenitis suppuritiva: a study of 106 cases. Strength of recommendation taxonomy Surgeon 2005;3:23–26. Strength of recommendation Definition A Recommendation based on 71. Tanaka A, Hatoko M, Tada H et al. Experience with consistent and good quality surgical treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. Ann Plast patient-oriented evidenceà Surg 2001;47:636–642. Lam et al: Hidradenitis Suppurativa Management 473

B Recommendation based on inconsistent or limited quality patient-oriented evidenceà C Recommendation based on consensus, usual practice, disease- oriented evidenceà or case series for studies of diagnosis, treatment, prevention or screening Adapted from Ebell et al (80) *High-quality RCT: allocation concealed, blinding if possible, intention-to-treat analysis, adequate statistical power, adequate follow-up (>80%). In an all-or-none study, the treatment causes a dramatic change in outcomes, such as antibiotics for meningitis or surgery for appen- dicitis, which precludes study in a controlled trial. àPatient-oriented evidence measures outcomes that matter to pa- tients: morbidity, mortality, symptom improvement, cost reduc- tion, and quality of life. Disease-oriented evidence measures intermediate, physiologic, or surrogate end points that may or may not reflect improvements in patient outcomes (e.g., , blood chemistry, physiologic function, pathologic findings). Consistent: Most studies found similar or at least coherent con- clusions (coherence means that differences are explainable) or if high-quality and up-to-date systematic reviews or meta-analyses exist, they support the recommendation. Inconsistent: Considerable variation among study findings and lack of coherence or if high-quality and up-to-date systematic reviews or meta-analyses exist, they do not find consistent evidence in favor of the recommendation.