DOCSLIB.ORG

The Legislative B Found Itself Debating at the Indoor Tennis Courts for Three Weeks, the Council of States Met in the Art Nouveau Gazebo of the Waldhaus Parkhotel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Legislative B Found Itself Debating at the Indoor Tennis Courts for Three Weeks, the Council of States Met in the Art Nouveau Gazebo of the Waldhaus Parkhotel Due to construction work on the Federal Palace, the third parliamentary session held outside Bern – after Geneva in 1993 and Lugano in 2001 – took place in Flims in canton Graubünden last autumn. While the National Council The Legislative B found itself debating at the indoor tennis courts for three weeks, the Council of States met in the Art Nouveau gazebo of the Waldhaus Parkhotel. 18 ve Branch: National Council and Council of States 19 The election of parliament Switzerland has a bicameral parliament at federal level: the federal chambers, which together constitute the United Federal Assembly. The National Council represents the overall population and the Council of States, the member states of the Confederation, i.e. the cantons. This system reflects the two principles on which the structure of the State is founded: the democratic principle according to which every vote carries the same weight and the federalist principle by which all cantons are treated equally. The cantons are represented in the Council of The People are represented in the National Council States The small chamber has 46 seats: 20 can- The large chamber has 200 seats. The number of deputies tons elect two representatives each and the six from a canton (each of which is a constituency) depends former half-cantons (Obwalden and Nidwalden, on its population size. Zurich with its large population Appenzell Innerrhoden and Appenzell Ausser- has 34 seats, while Uri and Glarus, Obwalden and Nid- rhoden, Basel-Stadt and Basel-Landschaft) each walden and Appenzell Innerrhoden and Appenzell elect one representative. In all cantons – with Ausserrhoden are each entitled to just one representa- the exception of Jura – the people elect their tive. Proportional representation is used for elections in deputies by a majority voting system. cantons with more than one seat. Seats in the Council of States Canton Seats in the National Council Inhabitants 2 Zurich 34 1 228 600 2 Bern 26 947 100 2 Vaud 18 626 200 2 Aargau 15 550 900 2 St. Gallen 12 452 600 2 Geneva 11 414 300 2 Lucerne 10 350 600 2 Ticino 8 311 900 2 Valais 7 278 200 1 Basel-Landschaft 7 261 400 2 Solothurn 7 245 500 2 Fribourg 7 239 100 2 Thurgau 6 228 200 1 Basel-Stadt 5 186 700 2 Graubünden 5 185 700 The former half-cantons 2 Neuchâtel 5 166 500 Six cantons, which had once formed 2 Schwyz 4 131 400 a single entity and then subsequently divided, used to be considered half- 2 Zug 3 100 900 cantons. These were Obwalden and Nidwalden which divided even before 2 Schaffhausen 2 73 400 1291, the two Appenzells which 2 Jura 2 69 100 divided in 1597 on religious grounds, and Basel which saw one part break 1 Appenzell Ausserrhoden 1 53 200 away from the town in 1833. 1 Nidwalden 1 38 600 2 Glarus 1 38 300 2 Uri 1 35 000 1 Obwalden 1 32 700 1 Appenzell Innerrhoden 1 15 000 20 Members of the Council of States The rules for elections to the small chamber vary from one canton to another; however, the term of office is always four years as in the National Council. ZH 1 Trix GL 13 This AR 25 Hans VD 37 Michel Heberlein Jenny Altherr Béguelin FDP, 2003 SVP, 1998 FDP, 2004 SP, 1999 [3] [5] [10] [1] [6] [8] [12] [1] [5] [7] [2] [3] [7] ZH 2 Hans GL 14 Fritz AI 26 Carlo VD 38 Christiane Hofmann Schiesser Schmid-Sutter Langenberger SVP, 1998 FDP, 1990 CVP, 1980 FDP, 1999 [2] [6] [8] [4] [9] [11] [3] [6] [10] [4] [5] [7] BE 3 Hans ZG 15 Peter SG 27 Eugen VS 39 Simon Lauri Bieri David Epiney SVP, 2001 CVP, 1995 CVP, 1999 CVP, 1999 [1] [9] [4] [7] [8] [4] [5] [9] [1] [6] [11] BE 4 Simonetta ZG 16 Rolf SG 28 Erika VS 40 Rolf Sommaruga Schweiger Forster-Vannini Escher SP, 2003 FDP, 1999 FDP, 1995 CVP, 1999 [3] [6] [9] [11] [1] [6] [11] [5] [6] [9] [2] [6] [8] [10] LU 5 Helen FR 17 Alain GR 29 Christoffel NE 41 Pierre Leumann-Würsch Berset Brändli Bonhôte FDP, 1995 SP, 2003 SVP, 1995 SP, 2005 [2] [4] [7] [9] [1] [9] [11] [12] [5] [6] [8] [2] [10] [11] LU 6 Franz FR 18 Urs GR 30 Theo NE 42 Gisèle Wicki Schwaller Maissen Ory CVP, 1995 CVP, 2003 CVP, 1995 SP, 2003 [2] [9] [11] [1] [5] [7] [3] [4] [7] [12] [2] [4] [5] UR 7 Hansheiri SO 19 Rolf AG 31 Thomas GE 43 Christiane Inderkum Büttiker Pfisterer Brunner CVP, 1995 FDP, 1991 FDP, 1999 SP, 1995 [6] [10] [11] [6] [8] [10] [1] [6] [8] [3] [5] [10] UR 8 Hansruedi SO 20 Ernst AG 32 Maximilian GE 44 Françoise Stadler Leuenberger Reimann Saudan CVP, 1999 SP, 1999 SVP, 1995 FDP, 1995 [2] [4] [11] [1] [8] [9] [3] [7] [10] [2] [3] [10] SZ 9 Bruno BS 21 Anita TG 33 Hermann JU 45 Madeleine Frick Fetz Bürgi Amgwerd CVP, 1991 SP, 2003 SVP, 1999 CVP, 2003 [3] [5] [9] [1] [4] [5] [4] [7] [11] [2] [4] [7] SZ 10 Alex BL 22 Hans TG 34 Philipp JU 46 Pierre-Alain Kuprecht Fünfschilling Stähelin Gentil SVP, 2003 FDP, 1999 CVP, 1999 SP, 1995 [2] [5] [7] [10] [1] [4] [8] [1] [3] [5] [7] [8] [10] OW 11 Hans SH 23 Peter TI 35 Filippo Hess Briner Lombardi FDP, 1998 FDP, 1999 CVP, 1999 [2] [7] [8] [11] [2] [3] [10] [12] [1] [6] [8] [12] The year of election to the Council is stated NW 12 Marianne SH 24 Hannes TI 36 Dick Slongo Germann Marty after the member’s party affiliation; the figures CVP, 1999 SVP, 2002 FDP, 1995 in brackets refer to the committees to which [8] [9] [10] [3] [4] [9] [11] [3] [9] [11] the member belongs (see page 27). 21 Members of the National Council Elections to the large chamber are held once every four years. The Federal Constitution guarantees at least one seat for each canton. In the cantons entitled to more than one seat because of their population, the people have elected their deputies by a system of proportional representation since 1919; that means that the number of seats held by the parties in the Council is roughly equivalent to the share of votes cast for them. ZH 1 Max ZH 21 Vreni BE 41 Peter LU 61 Franz ZG 81 Marcel Binder Müller-Hemmi Vollmer Brun Scherer SVP, 1991 SP, 1995 SP, 1989 CVP, 2003 SVP, 1999 [2] [8] [3] [4] [1] [8] [8] [12] [5] [12] ZH 2 Toni ZH 22 Anita BE 42 Ursula LU 62 Ida FR 82 Dominique Bortoluzzi Thanei Wyss Glanzmann-Hunkeler de Buman SVP, 1991 SP, 1995 SP, 1999 CVP, 2006 CVP, 2003 [5] [12] [11] [6] [10] [2] [7] [2] [4] [9] ZH 3 Hans ZH 23 Felix BE 43 Adrian LU 63 Ruedi FR 83 Thérèse Fehr Gutzwiller Amstutz Lustenberger Meyer SVP, 1995 FDP, 1999 SVP, 2003 CVP, 1999 CVP, 1999 [10] [5] [10] [6] [10] [5] [10] ZH 4 Hans ZH 24 Rolf BE 44 Ursula LU 64 Josef FR 84 Erwin Kaufmann Hegetschweiler Haller Kunz Jutzet SVP, 1999 FDP, 1991 SVP, 1999 SVP, 1995 SP, 1995 [1] [9] [6] [8] [7] [4] [6] [3] [11] ZH 5 Robert ZH 25 Markus BE 45 Rudolf LU 65 Otto FR 85 Christian Keller Hutter Joder Laubacher Levrat SVP, 1999 FDP, 2003 SVP, 1999 SVP, 1999 SP, 2003 [6] [12] [1] [10] [11] [8] [8] ZH 6 Ueli ZH 26 Filippo BE 46 Fritz Abraham LU 66 Felix FR 86 Hugo Maurer Leutenegger Oehrli Müri Fasel SVP, 1991 FDP, 2003 SVP, 1995 SVP, 2003 CSP, 1991 [1] [8] [10] [2] [7] [3] [2] [5] ZH 7 Christoph ZH 27 Ruedi BE 47 Simon LU 67 Otto FR 87 Jean-Paul Mörgeli Noser Schenk Ineichen Glasson SVP, 1999 FDP, 2003 SVP, 1994 FDP, 2003 FDP, 1999 [3] [4] [8] [4] [2] [11] ZH 8 Hans ZH 28 Ruth BE 48 Walter LU 68 Georges FR 88 Jean-François Rutschmann Genner Schmied Theiler Rime SVP, 2004 GP, 1998 SVP, 1991 FDP, 1995 SVP, 2003 [6] [12] [4] [9] [3] [6] [8] [9] ZH 9 Ernst ZH 29 Daniel BE 49 Hansruedi LU 69 Louis SO 89 Boris Schibli Vischer Wandfluh Schelbert Banga SVP, 2001 GP, 2003 SVP, 1999 GP, 2006 SP, 1995 [3] [10] [11] [9] [10] [3] [7] ZH 10 Ulrich ZH 30 Urs BE 50 Hermann LU 70 Hans SO 90 Bea Schlüer Hany Weyeneth Widmer Heim SVP, 1995 CVP, 2006 SVP, 1994 SP, 1996 SP, 2003 [3] [7] [2] [1] [10] [4] [7] [10] ZH 11 Jürg ZH 31 Kathy BE 51 Christa UR 71 Gabi SO 91 Roland Stahl Riklin Markwalder Bär Huber Borer SVP, 1999 CVP, 1999 FDP, 2003 FDP, 2003 SVP, 1991 [5] [6] [3] [4] [3] [4] [11] [5] [7] ZH 12 Bruno ZH 32 Ruedi BE 52 Johann N. SZ 72 Peter SO 92 Walter Zuppiger Aeschbacher Schneider Föhn Wobmann SVP, 1999 EVP, 1999 FDP, 1999 SVP, 1995 SVP, 2003 [1] [9] [6] [11] [9] [8] [3] ZH 13 Jacqueline ZH 33 Martin BE 53 Marc SZ 73 Pirmin SO 93 Kurt Fehr Bäumle Suter Schwander Fluri SP, 1998 glp, 2003 FDP, 1991–2003, 2007 SVP, 2003 FDP, 2003 [5] [8] [6] [12] [1] [10] [11] ZH 14 Mario ZH 34 Markus BE 54 Pierre SZ 74 Josi SO 94 Rudolf Fehr Wäfler Triponez Gyr-Steiner Steiner SP, 1999 EDU, 2003 FDP, 1999 SP, 2003 FDP, 1993 [3] [1] [5] [2] [12] [1] [6] ZH 15 Chantal BE 35 Evi BE 55 Therese SZ 75 Reto SO 95 Elvira Galladé Allemann Frösch Wehrli Bader SP, 2003 SP, 2003 GB, 2003 CVP, 2003 CVP, 1999 [4] [8] [1] [5] [9] ZH 16 Christine BE 36 André BE 56 Franziska OW 76 Adriano BS 96 Remo Goll Daguet Teuscher Imfeld Gysin SP, 1991 SP, 2003 GP, 1995 CVP, 2001 SP, 1995 [2] [5] [2] [5] [8] [9] [3] [9] ZH 17 Andreas BE 37 Paul BE 57 Walter NW 77 Eduard BS 97 Rudolf Gross Günter Donzé Engelberger Rechsteiner SP, 1991 SP, 1979–91, 1995 EVP, 2000 FDP, 1995 SP, 1995 [10] [7] [12] [7] [10] [7] [10] [5] [6] ZH 18 Barbara BE 38 Margret BE 58 Bernhard GL 78 Werner BS 98 Silvia Haering Kiener Nellen Hess Marti Schenker SP, 1990 SP, 2003 SD, 1999 SP, 1991 SP, 2003 [7] [1] [1] [8] [5] ZH 19 Vreni BE 39 Hans BE 59 Norbert ZG 79 Josef BS 99 Jean Henri Hubmann Stöckli Hochreutener Lang Dunant SP, 1995 SP, 2004 CVP, 1995–99, 2003 AL, 2003 SVP, 1999 [10] [11] [10] [12] [8] [11] [7] [5] ZH 20 Barbara BE 40 Ruth-Gaby BE 60 Christian ZG 80 Gerhard BS 100 Urs Marty Kälin Vermot-Mangold Waber Pfister Schweizer SP, 2000 SP, 1995 EDU, 1997 CVP, 2003 FDP, 2006 [6] [10] [2] [3] [10] [2] [6] 22 The year of election into the Council is stated after the member’s party affiliation; the figures in brackets refer to the committees to which the member belongs (see page 27).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Transparency of Political Party Funding), Adopted by GRECO At
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL I - HUMAN RIGHTS AND RULE OF LAW INFORMATION SOCIETY AND ACTION AGAINST CRIME DIRECTORATE Strasbourg, 21 October 2011 Greco Eval III Rep (2011) 4E Theme II Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Switzerland Transparency of Political Party Funding (Theme II) Adopted by GRECO at its 52nd Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 17-21 October 2011) Secrétariat du GRECO GRECO Secretariat www.coe.int/greco Conseil de l’Europe Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex ( +33 3 88 41 20 00 Fax +33 3 88 41 39 55 I. INTRODUCTION 1. Switzerland joined GRECO on 1 July 2006. GRECO adopted the report on the joint first and second evaluation rounds (Greco Eval I-II Rep (2007) 1E) at its 37th meeting (31 March- 4 April 2008). The aforementioned evaluation report, and the corresponding compliance report, are available on the GRECO web site (http://www.coe.int/greco). 2. The current Third Evaluation Round, which started on 1 January 2007, covers the following themes: - Theme I – Incriminations: articles 1a and 1b, 2-12, 15-17 and 19 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (ETS 173), articles 1-6 of its Additional Protocol (ETS 191) and Guiding Principle 2 (GPC 2) (incrimination of corruption). - Theme II - Transparency of Political Party Funding: articles 8, 11, 12, 13b, 14 and 16 of Recommendation Rec(2003)4 on common rules against corruption in the funding of political parties and election campaigns and – more generally – Guiding Principle 15 on financing of political parties and election campaigns. 3. The GRECO Evaluation Team (hereafter referred to as the “GET”), which carried out an on-site visit to Switzerland from 11 to 13 May 2011, comprised Mr Edmond DUNGA, Head of the Anti- Corruption Secretariat, Regional Anti-Corruption Initiative (Albania) and Professor Richard GHEVONTIAN, Vice-President of the Paul Cézanne University of Aix-Marseille III responsible for legal and statutory affairs, Director of research at the Louis Favoreu Institute, Study and Research group on constitutional justice (France).
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Guide Euroscepticism
    Information Guide Euroscepticism A guide to information sources on Euroscepticism, with hyperlinks to further sources of information within European Sources Online and on external websites Contents Introduction .................................................................................................. 2 Brief Historical Overview................................................................................. 2 Euro Crisis 2008 ............................................................................................ 3 European Elections 2014 ................................................................................ 5 Euroscepticism in Europe ................................................................................ 8 Eurosceptic organisations ......................................................................... 10 Eurosceptic thinktanks ............................................................................. 10 Transnational Eurosceptic parties and political groups .................................. 11 Eurocritical media ................................................................................... 12 EU Reaction ................................................................................................. 13 Information sources in the ESO database ........................................................ 14 Further information sources on the internet ..................................................... 14 Copyright © 2016 Cardiff EDC. All rights reserved. 1 Cardiff EDC is part of the University Library
    [Show full text]
  • Challenger Party List
    Appendix List of Challenger Parties Operationalization of Challenger Parties A party is considered a challenger party if in any given year it has not been a member of a central government after 1930. A party is considered a dominant party if in any given year it has been part of a central government after 1930. Only parties with ministers in cabinet are considered to be members of a central government. A party ceases to be a challenger party once it enters central government (in the election immediately preceding entry into office, it is classified as a challenger party). Participation in a national war/crisis cabinets and national unity governments (e.g., Communists in France’s provisional government) does not in itself qualify a party as a dominant party. A dominant party will continue to be considered a dominant party after merging with a challenger party, but a party will be considered a challenger party if it splits from a dominant party. Using this definition, the following parties were challenger parties in Western Europe in the period under investigation (1950–2017). The parties that became dominant parties during the period are indicated with an asterisk. Last election in dataset Country Party Party name (as abbreviation challenger party) Austria ALÖ Alternative List Austria 1983 DU The Independents—Lugner’s List 1999 FPÖ Freedom Party of Austria 1983 * Fritz The Citizens’ Forum Austria 2008 Grüne The Greens—The Green Alternative 2017 LiF Liberal Forum 2008 Martin Hans-Peter Martin’s List 2006 Nein No—Citizens’ Initiative against
    [Show full text]
  • Putting Brexit Into Perspective: the Effect of the Eurozone and Migration Crises and Brexit on Euroscepticism in European States
    Putting Brexit into perspective: the effect of the Eurozone and migration crises and Brexit on Euroscepticism in European states Article (Published Version) Taggart, Paul and Szczerbiak, Aleks (2018) Putting Brexit into perspective: the effect of the Eurozone and migration crises and Brexit on Euroscepticism in European states. Journal of European Public Policy, 25 (8). pp. 1194-1214. ISSN 1350-1763 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/74437/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page
    [Show full text]
  • Switzerland's Cancer President
    Masterpiece Switzerland’s cancer president ➜ Peter McIntyre When it comes to fighting cancer, coordination is key. And in the fiercely autonomous cantons of Switzerland, that coordination is provided by a network of institutes, leagues and foundations that covers everything from prevention and fundraising to clinical research. They all have one man in common – Giorgio Noseda. he outside world sees Switzerland as a variations in funding by cantons. There is excel- well-ordered country at the heart of lence in every aspect of cancer surveillance and T Europe, famous for its neutrality, preci- treatment somewhere in Switzerland and the sion watches and the excellence of its chocolate, Swiss pharmaceutical industry is a leading pro- industry, medicine and trains. ducer of anticancer drugs. However, the Swiss But Switzerland is complicated. Physically it system of cancer prevention, surveillance and is indeed at the heart of Europe. But Switzerland care is patchy and lacks coordination and equity. has never joined the European Union. It is home In terms of treatment, Switzerland is amongst to the World Health Organization and other UN the leaders in Europe. According to the EURO- bodies. But it only became a full member of the CARE 3 study (2003), Switzerland stands fifth UN in 2002. overall in terms of cancer survival, and tops the It is a neutral country with more soldiers European league for treatment of rectal cancer in under arms proportionately than any other men. However, since Swiss cancer registries European country. It is a democratic country that cover only 55% of the population, the EURO- did not give all women the vote until 1971.
    [Show full text]
  • KAS Auslandsinformationen 03/2012
    3|2012 KAS INTERNATIONAL REPORTS 53 creaky concordance system Parliamentary and Governmental elections in switzerland: divided conservatives defeated by consensus-oriented centre-riGht Parties Burkard Steppacher Elections in Switzerland have become quite exciting in recent years. The cooperation between the traditional ruling parties, which have been in power in a grand coali- tion since the end of the 1950s, has clearly been thrown into crisis,1 new parties have entered parliament and the political concordance that has existed for decades has started to creak and shift. However, it appears that these changes have not yet found a permanent footing.2 Prof. Dr. Burkard Steppacher is a staff member of the Every four years there are federal elections to select a new Konrad-Adenauer- parliament in Switzerland, a country with one of the most Stiftung Scholarship constitutionally stable political systems, both in Europe Programme and Honorary Professor 3 and the world. The larger chamber (National Council) has of Political Science 200 members and the smaller chamber (Council of States) at the University of has 46 members, with two members per canton, although Cologne. six so-called “half cantons” only have one member each. Once the members of both parliamentary chambers have been chosen, the chambers, which together make up the Federal Assembly, then elect the country’s seven-member federal government (Federal Council). The elections were watched with great interest in 2011, as there was the real possibility of a change to the federal government. 1 | Cf. Burkard Steppacher, “Die Krise der Konkordanz‟, Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik, 2/2008, 19-22; Michael Hartmann, Konkordanz in der Krise.
    [Show full text]
  • The People and the Nation; Populism and Ethno-Territorial Politics In
    THE PEOPLE AND THE NATION ‘‘This book theoretically and empirically fills a void in populist studies. It explores sys- tematically the relationships between territory, ethnicity, identity, and uneven develop- ment in European populist politics.’’ – Carlos de la Torre, Professor of Sociology, University of Kentucky, USA. Editor of The Routledge Handbook of Global Populism ‘‘This volume is both welcome and distinctive. It is welcome in that it contributes to our knowledge on fundamental questions structuring political debates: questions of populism, nationalism, territory, and identity. It is distinctive in that its empirical basis is rich and wide, covering twelve Western and Central European cases.’’ – Michaël Tatham, University of Bergen, Norway. ‘‘Based on a coherent and comprehensive analysis of relevant European political parties, the book is a timely analysis of the interactions between populist and ethno-territorial ideologies. It is a must-read for any student of contemporary political dynamics in Europe.’’ – Régis Dandoy, Ghent University, Belgium The edited book brings together country experts on populism, ethno-territorial politics and party competition. It consists of eleven empirical chapters, covering eight Western European states (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland and the UK) as well as four Central European states (Croatia, Hungary, Serbia and Poland). It is a collaboration by scholars from across Europe which contributes to the growing litera- ture on populism by focusing on a relatively unexplored research agenda: the intersection of territoriality, ethno-politics and populism. Presenting an original perspective, contributing experts use case studies to highlight the territorial dimension of populism in different ways and identify that a deeper understanding of the interactions between populist actors and ethno- territorial ideologies is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Right Populism and the Role of Positional Deprivation and Inequality
    LIS Working Paper Series No. 733 RADICAL RIGHT POPULISM AND THE ROLE OF POSITIONAL DEPRIVATION AND INEQUALITY Brian Burgoon, Sam van Noort, Matthijs Rooduijn and Geoffrey Underhill March 2018 Luxembourg Income Study (LIS), asbl RADICAL RIGHT POPULISM AND THE ROLE OF POSITIONAL DEPRIVATION AND INEQUALITY Brian Burgoona, Sam van Noortb, Matthijs Rooduijna and Geoffrey Underhilla a University of Amsterdam (Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research) b University of Cambridge (Centre of Development Studies) ABSTRACT This paper explores how support for radical right populist parties may be shaped by new measures of deprivation and inequality based on growth-incidence-curves, gauging growth in real household income across a country’s income deciles and calculating a given decile’s gains relative to the gains of other deciles. The paper argues that such positional measures capture drivers of economic resentment relevant to radical-right populism. First, radical right populism is more likely among individuals facing more ‘positional deprivation’, those in deciles with gains that are smaller than the gains of the average, richest or poorest deciles in their own country. Second, subjective low income more strongly spurs support for radical right populist parties in polities with higher ‘positional inequality’, where the wealthiest deciles experience greater gains than (or suffer less than) the median or poorest earners. The paper tests these expectations using individual-level survey data from sixteen European countries. It finds support for the arguments, not only in patterns of support and voting for parties in the radical right party family but also in patterns of support and voting for parties expressing more anti-globalization nationalism and authoritarianism in their party manifestos.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism Supplementary
    The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism Supplementary Online Appendix Yann Algan Sergei Guriev Sciences Po and CEPR EBRD, Sciences Po and CEPR Elias Papaioannou Evgenia Passari London Business School and CEPR Université Paris-Dauphine Abstract This supplementary online appendix consists of three parts. First, we provide summary statistics, additional sensitivity checks and further evidence. Second, we provide details and sources on the data covering regional output and unemployment, trust, beliefs, attitudes and voting statistics. Third, we provide the classification of non-mainstream political parties’ political orientation (far-right, radical-left, populist, Eurosceptic and separatist) for all countries. 1 1. Summary Statistics, Additional Sensitivity Checks, and Further Evidence 1.1 Summary Statistics Appendix Table 1 reports the summary statistics at the individual level for all variables that we use from the ESS distinguishing between the pre-crisis period (2000-08) and the post-crisis period (2009-14). Panel A looks at all questions on general trust, trust in national and supranational institutions, party identification, ideological position on the left-right scale and beliefs on the European unification issue whereas in panel B we focus on attitudes to immigration. 1.2 Additional Sensitivity Checks Appendix Table 2 looks at the relationship between employment rates and voting for anti- establishment parties. Panel A reports panel OLS estimates with region fixed effects. Panel B reports difference-in-differences estimates. In contrast to Table 4, the specifications now include a dummy that takes on the value of one for core countries (Austria, France, Norway, Sweden) and zero for the periphery countries (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Greece, Spain, Hungary, Ireland, Slovakia).
    [Show full text]
  • Switzerland's Political System
    Switzerland’s Political System 2nd updated and enlarged edition Miroslav Vurma 1. Introduction 2. Brief history of Switzerland 3. Swiss federal system 3.1 Federal Council 3.2 Swiss Parliament 3.3 Supreme judicial authorities 4. Division of powers between the federation, cantons and communes 5. Swiss Armed Forces 6. Political parties 7. Initiative and the referendum 8. Participation in direct democracy 8.1 Political exclusion of foreigners 8.2 Brief comparison with Europe 9. Conclusion 10. References 1. Introduction Switzerland is a small alpine state in the west of Europe and it seems today to be one of the most privileged countries in the world. In its history, Switzerland has survived successfully and remained independent when its neighbors were engaged in destructive confl icts. Nowadays, the country, with more than 8.4 million permanent residents1, enjoys one of the highest living standards among industrialized countries and the political stability of Switzerland is impressive. This article describes how it is possible that a country with four languages, two religions and diff erent ethnic groups could achieve such a high level of political culture. However, it would be completely inaccurate to think of Switzerland as a country without historical, political or social unrest and armed confrontations. In Switzerland, direct democracy, as 1 Federal Statistical Offi ce: Population (2017) ― 120 ― Switzerland’s Political System 2nd updated and enlarged edition（Miroslav Vurma） a component to indirect democracy, was established in early 19th century and has been developed further since then. The right of citizens to be directly involved in political decision-making is the central part of the Swiss modern direct democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 5: Macro Report Version: September 14, 2016
    Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1 Module 5: Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 5: Macro Report Version: September 14, 2016 Country: Switzerland Date of Election: 20 October 2019 Prepared by: Lukas Lauener, Laurent Bernhard, Anke Tresch Date of Preparation: 16 July 2020 NOTES TO COLLABORATORS There are eight sections (numbered A-H inclusive) in this report. Please ensure that you complete all the sections. The information provided in this report contributes to the macro data portion of the CSES, an important component of the CSES project. The information may be filled out by yourself, or by an expert or experts of your choice. Your efforts in providing these data are greatly appreciated. Any supplementary documents that you can provide (e.g.: electoral legislation, party manifestos, electoral commission reports, media reports, district data) are also appreciated, and may be made available on the CSES website. Answers should be as of the date of the election being studied. Where brackets [ ] appear, collaborators should answer by placing an “X” within the appropriate bracket or brackets. For example: [X] If more space is needed to answer any question, please lengthen the document as necessary. Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 2 Module 5: Macro Report A) DATA PERTINENT TO ELECTION AT WHICH MODULE WAS ADMINISTERED 1a. Type of Election: [X] Parliamentary/Legislative [ ] Parliamentary/Legislative and Presidential [ ] Presidential [ ] Other; please specify: __________ 1b. If the type of election in Question 1a included Parliamentary/Legislative, was the election for the Upper House, Lower House, or both? [ ] Upper House [ ] Lower House [X] Both [ ] Other; please specify: __________ 2a.
    [Show full text]