Adenovirus Vectors As Potent Adjuvants in Vaccine Development

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Adenovirus Vectors As Potent Adjuvants in Vaccine Development Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2014 Adenovirus Vectors as Potent Adjuvants in Vaccine Development Kathleen Ann Mcguire Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Virology Commons Recommended Citation Mcguire, Kathleen Ann, "Adenovirus Vectors as Potent Adjuvants in Vaccine Development" (2014). Dissertations. 905. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/905 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2014 Kathleen Ann Mcguire LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO ADENOVIRUS VECTORS AS POTENT ADJUVANTS IN VACCINE DEVELOPMENT A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY BY KATHLEEN A. MCGUIRE CHICAGO, IL MAY 2014 Copyright by Kathleen A. McGuire, 2014 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to thank my mentor, Dr. Chris Wiethoff, for his guidance throughout this process. Chris has taught me how to think critically, work independently, and has pushed me to reach my fullest potential. I would like to thank my committee chair, Dr. Ed Campbell, and the rest of my committee members: Dr. Knight, Dr. Gallagher and Dr. Zeleznik-Le. All of you have been incredibly influential in this process. I appreciate all of your feedback and suggestions. I want to thank the rest of the Microbiology and Immunology Department. I have appreciated the collegial work environment and the supportive group of faculty, staff and students. My friends and fellow lab members have made this experience incredibly fun. Chris sets the tone in the lab. He is invested in each student’s progress and runs a focused, hard-working lab while maintaining a light-hearted atmosphere. Thanks to all my lab mates and a special thanks to Shauna who has been a supportive friend as well as a lab mate. Thanks to my friends for making life in Chicago one of the best experiences of my life. I want to thank my family. To my brothers, Michael and Danny, I am proud to call you guys my brothers. Thanks for always looking out for your big sister. To my Mom and Dad, your unyielding support and love has always been exceptional. Your work ethic and drive have served as a model for my own life goals. Mom, you are the strongest person I know. You face every hardship with such grace and still manage to take care of everyone else so thanks to my family for everything. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii LIST OF TABLES vi LIST OF FIGURES vii ABSTRACT ix CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION 1 Vaccines 3 Adenoviruses 7 Innate Immune Response to Adenovirus 7 ROS as an Innate Immune Signal 12 Cellular Mediators of the Innate Immune Response to Adenovirus 18 Innate Immunity to Adenovirus is crucial to activation of the adaptive response 21 Adaptive Immune Response 22 Adenovirus as a Vaccine Vector 30 Malaria Pathogenesis and Current Vaccine Approaches 34 CHAPTER II: MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTAL METHODS 44 Cell lines and Culture 44 Stable cell lines 44 Virus Generation 45 Virus Preparation 47 Pfs25 expression from Ad5-pfs25 48 Reagents and Antibodies 49 Quantification of IL-1β and TNF-α secretion by ELISA 49 ROS Assay 50 Western Blot Analysis 50 qPCR for gp91phox Levels 51 Measurement of Cytosolic Cathepsin B and Cytochrome C 52 Assessment of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential 53 Mice and Immunizations 54 Determination of Pfs25-specific Antibody Titer and IgG Subclass Production 55 Determining the Relative Affinity of Pfs25-specific Serum Antibodies 55 B cell ELISPOTs 56 Ex Vivo Splenocyte Stimulation and Cytokine Production 57 Parasite Binding Assays 57 Standard Membrane Feeding Assays 58 iv Statistics 59 CHAPTER III: RESULTS 60 Investigating the role of reactive oxygen species in the proinflammatory response to adenovirus infection 60 Characterizing the antibody response to Pfs25 following vaccination with Ad5 expressing pfs25 90 Characterizing the antibody response to Pfs25 following heterologous prime-boost vaccination with Ad5-pfs25 followed by Pfs25-alum or homologous prime-boost with Pfs25-alum 105 Characterizing the antibody response to Pfs25 following boost with Ad5 containing capsid-displayed Pfs25 B cell epitopes 111 Determining the parasite-binding and transmission-blocking functions of Pfs25-specific antibodies generated by heterologous prime-boost vaccination with Ad5-pfs25 followed by boost with Ad5 containing capsid-displayed Pfs25 B cell epitopes 120 Determining the effect of pre-existing immunity on the antibody response to Pfs25 following vaccination with Ad5 containing capsid-displayed Pfs25 B cell epitopes 125 CHAPTER IV: DISCUSSION 130 ROS Play a Key Role in the Innate Immune Response to Adenovirus type 5 Infection 134 Ad5 induces ROS from the Mitochondria 136 Ad5-mediated Membrane Rupture is Required for the Generation of ROS 138 Cathepsin Activity Facilitates Mitochondrial Membrane Destabilization 140 The Natural Adjuvant Properties of Ad5 Vaccine Vectors can be Exploited to Generate Improved Transmission-blocking Vaccines Against Malaria 143 Vaccination with either Ad5 Expressing Pfs25 or Pfs25-alum does not elicit Pfs25-specific IFNγ-producing T cells 147 Vaccination with Ad5 Expressing pfs25 generates antibody-secreting cells in the bone marrow 150 Heterologous Prime-boost Vaccination with Ad5-pfs25 Followed by Pfs25-alum a More Robust Anti-Pfs25 Antibody Response than Homologous Prime-boost With Pfs25-alum 151 Boost Vaccination with Novel Adenovirus-vectored Vaccines Displaying Pfs25 B Cell Epitopes Enhances the Pfs25-specific Antibody Response 153 Ad5-HVR-pfs25 Boost Generates a Robust Pfs25-specific Antibody Response 155 Ad5-vectored Prime-boost Vaccinations Generate Pfs25-specific Antibodies that Bind Mosquito Stage Plasmodium falciparum Gametes and Block Transmission 157 Pre-existing Immunity does not Affect the Immune Response to Capsid- displayed Antigens upon Primary Immunization with Ad5-HVR-pfs25 161 REFERENCES 163 v VITA 185 vi LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Primer Sequences for Recombineering 47 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Adenovirus Capsid 6 Figure 2. Innate Immune Activation following Adenovirus Infection 13 Figure 3. Model of Potential Sources of ROS upon Adenovirus Infection 15 Figure 4. Malaria Pathogenesis 36 Figure 5. Pfs25 Structure 40 Figure 6. Role of NLRP3, Caspase-1 and ROS in Ad5-induced IL-1β release 63 Figure 7. Ad5-induced ROS production and the role of ROS in Ad5-induced TNFα secretion 70 Figure 8. ROS production in response to Ad5 infection in the presence or absence of TLR9 knockdown 72 Figure 9. ROS production in response to Ad5 in the presence or absence of gp91phox (Nox2) knockdown 75 Figure 10. Ad5-induced ROS production and IL-1b Release in the presence or absence of bcl-2 overexpression 78 Figure 11. Proposed Mechanism of Ad5-Induced ROS 80 Figure 12. Cellular Localization of Cathepsin following Ad5 treatment 84 Figure 13. Mitochondrial membrane destabilization upon Ad5 infection in the presence or absence of the cathepsin B inhibitor Ca074me 87 Figure 14. Ad5-induced ROS in the presence of Ca074me 89 Figure 15. Pfs25 expression from a transgene within the Ad5 genome 95 Figure 16. Pfs25-specific serum antibody response upon primary immunization with an Ad vector expressing Pfs25 100 viii Figure 17. Antibody-secreting cells from the spleen and bone marrow following Ad5-pfs25 or Pfs25-alum vaccination 103 Figure 18. T cell activation following Ad5-pfs25 primary vaccination 106 Figure 19. Pfs25-specific serum antibody response upon heterologous prime-boost with Ad5-pfs25 followed by Pfs25-alum or homologous prime-boost with Pfs25-alum 110 Figure 20. Pfs25 epitope expression within Ad5 Hexon 113 Figure 21. Pfs25-specific serum antibody response upon primary immunization with Pfs25-alum and boost with Ad containing capsid-displayed Pfs25 B cell epitopes 116 Figure 22. Pfs25-specific serum antibody response upon heterologous prime-boost Ad5-pfs25 followed by Ad5-HVR-pfs25 boost 122 Figure 23. P. falciparum load in Anopheles mosquitoes in the presence of vaccine serum 124 Figure 24. Ad12 cross-reactivity with Ad5 pre-existing immunity 127 Figure 25. Pfs25-specific serum antibody response upon primary immunization in the presence of pre-existing immunity 129 ix ABSTRACT Due to their ability to activate the immune system, replication-defective Adenoviruses (Ad) are potential vaccine vectors for several pathogens. The rapid proinflammatory response generated by Ad is key to the ability of these vectors to generate a response to a target vaccine antigen. We found that reactive oxygen species (ROS) are an important signal in the proinflammatory response to Ad. We identified that serotype 5 adenovirus (Ad5) elicits ROS by inducing mitochondrial membrane damage, a process that is dependent on endosomal membrane rupture and Cathepsin release. Our studies demonstrated that mitochondrial damage contributes to NLRP3 inflammasome- and NFκB-dependent innate immune activation upon Ad infection. This ROS-dependent inflammatory response likely contributes to the adaptive immune response by supporting DC maturation and activation, lymphocyte recruitment to the site of vaccination, and cytokine production influencing B and T
Recommended publications
  • Immunogenicity of Clinically Relevant SARS-Cov-2 Vaccines
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 September 2020 1 Immunogenicity of clinically relevant SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in non-human primates and humans P. J. Klasse (1,*), Douglas F. Nixon (2,*) and John P. Moore (1,+) 1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology; 2 Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065 *These authors contributed equally +Correspondence: [email protected] Short title: SARS-CoV-2 vaccine immunogenicity Key words: SARS-CoV-2, S-protein, RBD, COVID-19, neutralizing antibodies, serology, T- cells, vaccines, animal models, Operation Warp Speed © 2020 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 September 2020 2 Abstract Multiple preventive vaccines are being developed to counter the COVID-19 pandemic. The leading candidates have now been evaluated in non-human primates (NHPs) and human Phase 1 and/or Phase 2 clinical trials. Several vaccines have already advanced into Phase 3 efficacy trials, while others will do so before the end of 2020. Here, we summarize what is known of the antibody and T-cell immunogenicity of these vaccines in NHPs and humans. To the extent possible, we compare how the vaccines have performed, taking into account the use of different assays to assess immunogenicity and inconsistencies in how the resulting data are presented. We also summarize the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 challenge experiments in immunized macaques, while noting variations in the protocols used, including but not limited to the virus challenge doses. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 September 2020 3 Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic rages unabated and may continue to do so until there is a safe, effective and widely used protective vaccine.
    [Show full text]
  • Immunogenicity of a New Gorilla Adenovirus Vaccine Candidate for COVID-19
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.22.349951; this version posted October 22, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Immunogenicity of a new gorilla adenovirus vaccine candidate for COVID-19 Stefania Capone1,6, Angelo Raggioli1,6, Michela Gentile1, Simone Battella1, Armin Lahm1, Andrea Sommella1, Alessandra Maria Contino1, Richard A. Urbanowicz2,3,4, Romina Scala1, Federica Barra1, Adriano Leuzzi1, Eleonora Lilli1, Giuseppina Miselli1, Alessia Noto1, Maria Ferraiuolo1, Francesco Talotta1, Theocharis Tsoleridis2,3,4, Concetta Castilletti5, Giulia Matusali5, Francesca Colavita5, Daniele Lapa5, Silvia Meschi5, Maria Capobianchi5, Marco Soriani1, Antonella Folgori1, Jonathan K. Ball2,3,4, Stefano Colloca1 and Alessandra Vitelli1* 1 ReiThera Srl, Rome, Italy 2 School of Life Sciences, The University of Nottingham, UK 3 NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, The University of Nottingham, UK 4 Wolfson Centre for Emerging Virus Research, The University of Nottingham, UK 5 National Institute for Infectious Diseases "Lazzaro Spallanzani" IRCCS 6 These authors contributed equally * [email protected] ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the emergent SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus threatens global public health and there is an urgent need to develop safe and effective vaccines. Here we report the generation and the preclinical evaluation of a novel replication-defective gorilla adenovirus-vectored vaccine encoding the pre-fusion stabilized Spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV2. We show that our vaccine candidate, GRAd- COV2, is highly immunogenic both in mice and macaques, eliciting both functional antibodies which neutralize SARS-CoV-2 infection and block Spike protein binding to the ACE2 receptor, and a robust, Th1- dominated cellular response in the periphery and in the lung.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates in Development, Special Focus on Mrna and Viral Vector Platforms Dr
    To view an archived recording of this presentation please click the following link: http://pho.adobeconnect.com/pbwjspa1fh9a/ Please scroll down this file to view a copy of the slides from the session. Helpful tips when viewing the recording: • The default presentation format includes showing the “event index”. To close the events index, please click on the following icon and hit “close” • If you prefer to view the presentation in full screen mode, please click on the following icon in the top right hand corner of the share screen PublicHealthOntario.ca 2 COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates in Development, special focus on mRNA and viral vector platforms Dr. Marina Salvadori and Dr. April Killikelly Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, PHAC October 1, 2020 Disclosures • None of the presenters at this session have received financial support or in-kind support from a commercial sponsor. • None of the presenters have potential conflicts of interest to declare. 2 OBJECTIVE • Describe the mechanism of action of mRNA, viral vector and protein- based vaccines • Discuss the evidence available for vaccines in development that may be available in Canada if proved safe and effective 3 Global COVID-19 Vaccine Development Landscape: • As of September 24, 2020, 63 clinical trials have been registered for developmental vaccine candidates against COVID-19. • Two anti-SARS-COV-2 vaccine candidates have obtained regulatory authorization to initiate clinical trials in Canada and one vaccine candidate has begun clinical testing in Canada (Medicago). 4 Lead Candidate COVID-19 Vaccine Development Landscape: Protein-based (top box), viral vector based (middle box) and mRNA (bottom box) and technology constitute the majority of the front running COVID-19 vaccine technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Adenoviral Vector COVID-19 Vaccines: Process and Cost Analysis
    processes Article Adenoviral Vector COVID-19 Vaccines: Process and Cost Analysis Rafael G. Ferreira 1,* , Neal F. Gordon 2, Rick Stock 2 and Demetri Petrides 3 1 Intelligen Brasil, Sao Paulo 01227-200, Brazil 2 BDO USA, LLP, Boston, MA 02110, USA; [email protected] (N.F.G.); [email protected] (R.S.) 3 Intelligen, Inc., Scotch Plains, NJ 07076, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has motivated the rapid development of numerous vaccines that have proven effective against SARS-CoV-2. Several of these successful vaccines are based on the adenoviral vector platform. The mass manufacturing of these vaccines poses great challenges, especially in the context of a pandemic where extremely large quantities must be produced quickly at an affordable cost. In this work, two baseline processes for the production of a COVID-19 adenoviral vector vaccine, B1 and P1, were designed, simulated and economically evaluated with the aid of the software SuperPro Designer. B1 used a batch cell culture viral production step, with a viral titer of 5 × 1010 viral particles (VP)/mL in both stainless-steel and disposable equipment. P1 used a perfusion cell culture viral production step, with a viral titer of 1 × 1012 VP/mL in exclusively disposable equipment. Both processes were sized to produce 400 M/yr vaccine doses. P1 led to a smaller cost per dose than B1 ($0.15 vs. $0.23) and required a much smaller capital investment ($126 M vs. $299 M). The media and facility-dependent expenses were found to be the main contributors to the operating cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Protective Zika Vaccines Engineered to Eliminate Enhancement of Dengue Infection Via Immunodominance Switch
    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-021-00966-6 Protective Zika vaccines engineered to eliminate enhancement of dengue infection via immunodominance switch Lianpan Dai 1,2,3,8 ✉ , Kun Xu3,8, Jinhe Li2,4,8, Qingrui Huang5, Jian Song 1, Yuxuan Han2, Tianyi Zheng2,4, Ping Gao2,4, Xuancheng Lu6, Huabing Yang 5, Kefang Liu7, Qianfeng Xia3, Qihui Wang 1, Yan Chai1, Jianxun Qi 1, Jinghua Yan 5 ✉ and George F. Gao 1,2,4 ✉ Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is an important safety concern for vaccine development against dengue virus (DENV) and its antigenically related Zika virus (ZIKV) because vaccine may prime deleterious antibodies to enhance natural infections. Cross-reactive antibodies targeting the conserved fusion loop epitope (FLE) are known as the main sources of ADE. We design ZIKV immunogens engineered to change the FLE conformation but preserve neutralizing epitopes. Single vaccination conferred sterilizing immunity against ZIKV without ADE of DENV-serotype 1–4 infections and abrogated maternal–neonatal transmis- sion in mice. Unlike the wild-type-based vaccine inducing predominately cross-reactive ADE-prone antibodies, B cell profiling revealed that the engineered vaccines switched immunodominance to dispersed patterns without DENV enhancement. The crystal structure of the engineered immunogen showed the dimeric conformation of the envelope protein with FLE disruption. We provide vaccine candidates that will prevent both ZIKV infection and infection-/vaccination-induced DENV ADE. IKV is a mosquito-borne pathogen belonging to the genus models12,13,19,20. More importantly, a recent study of pediatric cohorts Flavivirus in the family Flaviviridae1. The 2015–2016 ZIKV in Nicaragua clearly shows that previous ZIKV infection enhanced epidemic spread to 84 countries worldwide, including future risk of DENV2 disease and severity, as well as DENV3 sever- Z2,3 21,22 China .
    [Show full text]
  • Prediction of the Supportive Vaccine Type of the Covid-19 for Public Health
    Available online at http://scik.org J. Math. Comput. Sci. 11 (2021), No. 5, 5703-5719 https://doi.org/10.28919/jmcs/5738 ISSN: 1927-5307 PREDICTION OF THE SUPPORTIVE VACCINE TYPE OF THE COVID-19 FOR PUBLIC HEALTH NISHANT NAMDEV, ARVIND KUMAR SINHA* Department of Mathematics, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, India Copyright © 2021 the author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract: The novel corona virus SARS-Cov-2 caused the COVID-19 pandemic and mostly deteriorated the respiratory system. This paper aims to predict the supportive vaccine type (RNA, Non-replicating viral vector, DNA, Inactivated, Protein subunit) of COVID-19 for the human being by the rough set's novel process. The Rough set is an approach to identify patterns in uncertainty. The vaccine dataset, vaccine name, number of tested cases, age, randomize, and vaccine types of COVID-19 have been taken to overcome this disaster. By the rough set method, the supportive vaccine pattern is predicted, and it is observed that the vaccine based on RNA is highly supported to the human beings compared to the others. Extensive tests explained the Pfizer vaccine (RNA) is 95% effective, Moderna (mRNA) is 94.1%, while the Oxford/AstraZeneca (Non-replicating) one is 62%. It shows that the efficiency obtained by the rough set is accurate. A data-intensive computer-based analysis is given for the medical system. Furthermore, we present an extended record of sources that will support the scientific bioinformatics society to attain various sorts of a database linked to SARS-CoV-2 and advances to associate with COVID-19 treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of India PIB Press Briefing 8Th December 2020 India: Covid-19 Snapshot (As on 8Th December)
    Government of India PIB Press Briefing 8th December 2020 India: Covid-19 Snapshot (As on 8th December) Total cases Active cases Deaths Tests 97.03 lakhs 3.83 lakhs 1.40 lakhs 14.8 crores Case Per Million Contribution Death Per Million Tests Per Million 7,031 3.96% 102 107,836 Case Positivity Case Fatality Rate 6.5% 3.2% 1.45% 1.3% (Overall) (Last 1 week) (Overall) (Last 1 week) Cases per million population – Amongst the lowest in the world 45,000 43,495 40,000 34,514 35,000 30,942 30,000 28,594 25,384 25,000 20,000 17,055 15,000 10,000 7,031 5,000 0 India Russia UK Italy Brazil France USA Source: WHO COVID-19 Dashboard updated 7th December 2020 Deaths per million population – Amongst the lowest in the world 993 1,000 902 900 830 839 842 800 700 600 500 400 298 300 200 102 100 0 India Russia Brazil France USA UK Italy Source: WHO COVID-19 Dashboard updated 7th December 2020 Deteriorating Situation in the World 44k USA 217k SPAIN TURKEY in Early - Dec in End - Nov 77k 32k in Mid - Aug 55k in Mid - April in Early - Nov 10k 5k in Early - April in Mid - April Mar May Jul Sep Nov Mar May Jul Sep Nov Mar May Jul Sep Nov 98k INDIA RUSSIA 28k UNITED KINGDOM 34k in Early - Sep in Early - Dec in Mid - Nov 11k in Early - May 6k in Early - April Mar May Jul Sep Nov Mar May Jul Sep Nov Mar May Jul Sep Nov FRANCE BRAZIL 55k 49k in Early - August 125k in Early - Dec in Mid - Nov 26k in End - April Country Trajectory as on 8th December 2020; Mar May Jul Sep Nov Mar May Jul Sep Nov Source: coronavirus.jhu.edu; India: Active cases continue to decline, now below 4 lakhs 10,03,299 10,00,000 8,12,390 8,00,000 6,97,330 5,61,908 6,00,000 3,73,379 3,83,866 4,00,000 2,00,000 0 Top States/UTs contributing to total active cases Active Cases Maharashtra 76,852 Kerala 59,607 Karnataka 24,786 West Bengal 23,829 Delhi 22,486 These 5 states contribute 54% of total active cases in the country COVID-19 Vaccination “I would like to tell my countrymen that our scientists are dutifully engaged in the laboratories.
    [Show full text]
  • Current and Future HPV Vaccines: Promise and Challenges
    Current and Future HPV Vaccines: Promise and Challenges 2006 1455 NW Leary Way Seattle, WA 98107-5136 USA Tel: 206.285.3500 Fax: 206.285.6619 www.path.org Copyright © 2006, Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH). All rights reserved. The material in this document may be freely used for educational or noncommercial purposes, provided that the material is accompanied by an acknowledgement line. Contents Abbreviations and acronyms....................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgments....................................................................................................................... 3 Executive summary..................................................................................................................... 4 Therapeutic vaccines ...............................................................................................................4 Introducing prophylactic HPV vaccines..................................................................................5 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 7 A. HPV-related disease............................................................................................................7 B. Prophylactic and therapeutic vaccine strategies..................................................................9 II. Prophylactic vaccine research ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy for COVID-19 Vaccination in India: the Country with the Second Highest Population and Number of Cases ✉ Velayudhan Mohan Kumar 1, Seithikurippu R
    www.nature.com/npjvaccines PERSPECTIVE OPEN Strategy for COVID-19 vaccination in India: the country with the second highest population and number of cases ✉ Velayudhan Mohan Kumar 1, Seithikurippu R. Pandi-Perumal 2 , Ilya Trakht3 and Sadras Panchatcharam Thyagarajan 4 Free vaccination against COVID-19 commenced in India on January 16, 2021, and the government is urging all of its citizens to be immunized, in what is expected to be the largest vaccination program in the world. Out of the eight COVID-19 vaccines that are currently under various stages of clinical trials in India, four were developed in the country. India’s drug regulator has approved restricted emergency use of Covishield (the name employed in India for the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine) and Covaxin, the home- grown vaccine produced by Bharat Biotech. Indian manufacturers have stated that they have the capacity to meet the country’s future needs for COVID-19 vaccines. The manpower and cold-chain infrastructure established before the pandemic are sufficient for the initial vaccination of 30 million healthcare workers. The Indian government has taken urgent measures to expand the country’s vaccine manufacturing capacity and has also developed an efficient digital system to address and monitor all the aspects of vaccine administration. npj Vaccines (2021) 6:60 ; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-021-00327-2 1234567890():,; INTRODUCTION eight vaccine candidates, currently undergoing clinical trials in A year has passed since the first case of novel coronavirus India, is shown in Table 1 and their technical details are given in 13 infections was detected in China’s Wuhan province.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Chimpanzee Adenovirus-Vectored Respiratory Mucosal Tuberculosis Vaccine: Overcoming Local Anti-Human Adenovirus Immunity for Potent TB Protection
    nature publishing group ARTICLES Novel chimpanzee adenovirus-vectored respiratory mucosal tuberculosis vaccine: overcoming local anti-human adenovirus immunity for potent TB protection M Jeyanathan1,3, N Thanthrige-Don1,3, S Afkhami1,3, R Lai1, D Damjanovic1, A Zganiacz1, X Feng1, X-D Yao1, KL Rosenthal1, M Fe Medina1, J Gauldie1, HC Ertl2 and Z Xing1 Pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) remains to be a major global health problem despite many decades of parenteral use of Bacillus Calmette–Gue´ rin (BCG) vaccine. Developing safe and effective respiratory mucosal TB vaccines represents a unique challenge. Over the past decade or so, the human serotype 5 adenovirus (AdHu5)-based TB vaccine has emerged as one of the most promising candidates based on a plethora of preclinical and early clinical studies. However, anti-AdHu5 immunity widely present in the lung of humans poses a serious gap and limitation to its real-world applications. In this study we have developed a novel chimpanzee adenovirus 68 (AdCh68)-vectored TB vaccine amenable to the respiratory route of vaccination. We have evaluated AdCh68-based TB vaccine for its safety, T-cell immunogenicity, and protective efficacy in relevant animal models of human pulmonary TB with or without parenteral BCG priming. We have also compared AdCh68-based TB vaccine with its AdHu5 counterpart in both naive animals and those with preexisting anti-AdHu5 immunity in the lung. We provide compelling evidence that AdCh68-based TB vaccine is not only safe when delivered to the respiratory tract but, importantly, is also superior to its AdHu5 counterpart in induction of T-cellresponses and immune protection, and limiting lung immunopathology in the presence of preexisting anti-AdHu5 immunity in the lung.
    [Show full text]
  • The BCG Vaccine for COVID-19: First Verdict and Future Directions
    MINI REVIEW published: 08 March 2021 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.632478 The BCG Vaccine for COVID-19: First Verdict and Future Directions Maria Gonzalez-Perez 1, Rodrigo Sanchez-Tarjuelo 2, Boris Shor 3, Estanislao Nistal-Villan 4,5 and Jordi Ochando 1,2* 1 Transplant Immunology Unit, Department of Immunology, National Center of Microbiology, Instituto De Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain, 2 Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States, 3 Manhattan BioSolutions, New York, NY, United States, 4 Microbiology Section, Departamento de Ciencias Farmacéuticas y de la Salud, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad San Pablo-Centro de Estudios Universitarios (CEU), Madrid, Spain, 5 Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Medicina Molecular Aplicada (IMMA), Universidad San Pablo-CEU, Madrid, Spain Despite of the rapid development of the vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), it will take several months to have enough doses and the proper infrastructure to vaccinate a good proportion of the world population. In this interim, the accessibility to the Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) may mitigate the pandemic impact in some countries and the BCG vaccine offers significant advantages and flexibility in the way clinical vaccines are administered. BCG vaccination is a highly cost-effective intervention against tuberculosis (TB) and many low-and lower-middle-income countries would likely have the infrastructure, Edited by: and health care personnel sufficiently familiar with the conventional TB vaccine to Jose Luis Subiza, mount full-scale efforts to administer novel BCG-based vaccine for COVID-19. This Inmunotek SL, Spain suggests the potential for BCG to overcome future barriers to vaccine roll-out in Reviewed by: the countries where health systems are fragile and where the effects of this new Christine Wong, Charité—Universitätsmedizin coronavirus could be catastrophic.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Risk Assessment of Recombinant Viral Vector Vaccines Against SARS-Cov-2
    Review Environmental Risk Assessment of Recombinant Viral Vector Vaccines against SARS-Cov-2 Aline Baldo * , Amaya Leunda, Nicolas Willemarck and Katia Pauwels Sciensano, Service Biosafety and Biotechnology, Rue Juliette Wytsmanstraat 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium; [email protected] (A.L.); [email protected] (N.W.); [email protected] (K.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +32-2642-52-69 Abstract: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative agent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Over the past months, considerable efforts have been put into developing effective and safe drugs and vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Various platforms are being used for the development of COVID-19 vaccine candidates: recombinant viral vectors, protein-based vaccines, nucleic acid-based vaccines, and inactivated/attenuated virus. Recombinant viral vector vaccine candidates represent a significant part of those vaccine candidates in clinical development, with two already authorised for use in the European Union and one currently under rolling review by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Since recombinant viral vector vaccine candidates are considered as genetically modified organisms (GMOs), their regulatory oversight includes besides an assessment of their quality, safety and efficacy, also an environmental risk assessment (ERA). The present article highlights the main characteristics of recombinant viral vector vaccine (candidates) against SARS-CoV-2 in the pipeline and discusses their features from an Citation: Baldo, A.; Leunda, A.; environmental risk point of view. Willemarck, N.; Pauwels, K. Environmental Risk Assessment of Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; recombinant viral vector vaccines; environmental risk assess- Recombinant Viral Vector Vaccines ment; vaccination; biosafety against SARS-Cov-2.
    [Show full text]