DOCSLIB.ORG

Distinct Humoral and Cellular Immunity Induced by Alternating

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Distinct Humoral and Cellular Immunity Induced by Alternating http://dx.doi.org/10.4110/in.2011.11.5.268 ORIGINAL ARTICLE pISSN 1598-2629 eISSN 2092-6685 Distinct Humoral and Cellular Immunity Induced by Alternating Prime-boost Vaccination Using Plasmid DNA and Live Viral Vector Vaccines Expressing the E Protein of Dengue Virus Type 2 Junu A. George and Seong Kug Eo* College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-Safety Research Institute, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 561-756, Korea Background: Dengue virus, which belongs to the Flavivirus significantly enhanced by booster vaccination with the DNA genus of the Flaviviridae family, causes fatal dengue hemor- vaccine. Therefore, our observation will provide valuable in- rhagic fever (DHF) and dengue shock syndrome (DSS) with formation for the establishment of optimal prime-boost vac- infection risk of 2.5 billion people worldwide. However, ap- cination against DenV. proved vaccines are still not available. Here, we explored the [Immune Network 2011;11(5):268-280] immune responses induced by alternating prime-boost vacci- nation using DNA vaccine, adenovirus, and vaccinia virus ex- INTRODUCTION pressing E protein of dengue virus type 2 (DenV2). Methods: Following immunization with DNA vaccine (pDE), adenovirus Dengue virus (DenV) has four serotypes (DenV1, DenV2, (rAd-E), and/or vaccinia virus (VV-E) expressing E protein, E DenV3, and DenV4), and belongs to the Flavivirus genus of protein-specific IgG and its isotypes were determined by the Flaviviridae family transmitted to humans by the mosquito conventional ELISA. Intracellular CD154 and cytokine stain- Aedes aegypti (1-3). DenV poses a significant public health ing was used for enumerating CD4＋ T cells specific for E threat to 2.5 billion people at the risk of infection (1-3). protein. E protein-specific CD8＋ T cell responses were eval- uated by in vivo CTL killing activity and intracellular IFN-γ Around 100 million cases of DenV infections occur annually, staining. Results: Among three constructs, VV-E induced the producing symptoms ranging from mild fever to severe hem- most potent IgG responses, Th1-type cytokine production by orrhagic, potentially fatal fever (1-3). Dengue hemorrhagic fe- stimulated CD4＋ T cells, and the CD8＋ T cell response. ver (DHF) and dengue shock syndrome (DSS), which re- Furthermore, when the three constructs were used for alter- portedly affect about 500,000 people per year, are potentially nating prime-boost vaccination, the results revealed a differ- fatal diseases (1-3). These diseases are spreading from trop- ent pattern of CD4＋ and CD8＋ T cell responses. i) Priming ical to subtropical areas of the world by global warming, in- with VV-E induced higher E-specific IgG level but it was de- creasing travel activity, and uncontrolled urbanization (1-3). creased rapidly. ii) Strong CD8＋ T cell responses specific Despite global morbidity and mortality, the pathogenesis of for E protein were induced when VV-E was used for the pri- diseases caused by DenV infection is poorly understood. ming step, and such CD8＋ T cell responses were sig- Even though several factors such as viral virulence, age and nificantly boosted with pDE. iii) Priming with rAd-E induced genetic predisposition of the patient are implicated, the most stronger CD4＋ T cell responses which subsequently boost- ed with pDE to a greater extent than VV-E and rAd-E. important factor is considered to be sequential infection by Conclusion: These results indicate that priming with live viral different serotypes in an endemic area (4,5). While approved vector vaccines could induce different patterns of E pro- vaccines remain unavailable, several approaches to develop tein-specific CD4＋ and CD8＋ T cell responses which were a dengue vaccine have been evaluated. These include the tra- Received on September 16, 2011. Revised on September 28, 2011. Accepted on October 4, 2011. CC This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribu- tion, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. *Corresponding Author. Tel: 82-63-270-3882; Fax: 82-63-270-3780; E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Dengue virus type 2, E protein, DNA vaccine, Recombinant adenovirus, Vaccinia virus, Prime-boost vaccination 268 IMMUNE NETWORK http://www.ksimm.or.kr Volume 11 Number 5 October 2011 Immunity Induced by Alternating Prime-boost Vaccination against DenV2 Junu A. George, et al. ditional live attenuated vaccines (6-9), recombinant subunit a variety of cells, making them ideal vaccine carriers (32,33). vaccines produced using several different host systems In contrast, vaccinia virus-vectored recombinants show unre- (10-13), chimeric virus such as yellow fever vaccine vector stricted replication in immune-compromised individuals (34). YF17D-based ChimeriVax (14,15) and RepliVax (16), and Here, we explored the immune responses induced by alter- DNA vaccine (17,18). nating prime-boost vaccination using these different viral vec- All four dengue serotypes have co-circulated in most en- tor vaccines expressing E protein of DenV2, which is a major demic countries at various times, thereby causing concurrent immunogen involved in conferring protective immunity and/or sequential infection by multiple serotypes (19). against dengue infection. We found that vaccinia virus ex- Furthermore, there is the potential for antibody-dependent pressing E protein produced better responses compared to enhancement (ADE) associated with non-neutralizing cross- adenovirus at equivalent antigen doses, and these viral vec- reactive antibodies arising from immunization with mono- tors elicited different patterns of CD4＋ and CD8＋ T cell re- valent dengue virus vaccines (19). Therefore, a dengue virus sponses against E protein when used for alternating prime- vaccine should elicit protective immunity simultaneously to all boost vaccination. Therefore, humoral and cellular immune four serotypes. The current approach to making a tetravalent responses induced by alternating prime-boost vaccination us- dengue vaccine is to create monovalent vaccine candidates, ing live viral vector vaccine, vaccinia and adenovirus, and and then mix these to obtain a tetravalent formulation DNA vaccine are discussed. (20-22). The application of this approach to live, replicating virus vaccine has revealed the potential for viral interference MATERIALS AND METHODS in some instances (22,23). Considering viral interference in vaccination with live viral vector vaccine, multiple prime- Animals and ethics statement boost vaccinations with alternating vaccine vehicles using Female BALB/c (H-2d) mice, 5 to 6 weeks of age, were pur- DNA vaccine expressing the same antigen may become an chased from Samtako (Osan, Korea). The mice were main- effective strategy for eliciting robust immune responses to the tained in the animal facility at Chonbuk National University target antigen (24). Notably, the prime-boost protocol, in under standard conditions. All experimental procedures and which antigen-encoding DNA vaccine is administered first, animal management procedures were undertaken in accord- followed by a boost with live viral vector expressing the same ance with the requirement of the Animal Care and Ethics antigen, has elicited effective protective immunity in both Committees of Chonbuk National University. The animal fa- mouse and primate models of several infectious diseases cility at Chonbuk National University is fully accredited by the (25,26). However, some experiments claimed that priming National Association of Laboratory Animal Care. with live viral vector vaccine and boosting with DNA vaccine induces superior immune responses against encoded antigens Plasmid DNA preparation (27,28), which suggest that optimal prime-boost protocol to Plasmid DNA encoding E protein of dengue virus type 2 induce effective immunity may be dependent on several fac- (DenV2) under the control of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) pro- tors such as encoded antigens, animal species, and properties moter (pDE) was constructed by inserting cDNA of the E pro- of vaccine vectors. tein gene into pCI-neo vector (Promega, Madison, WI). For Various viral vectors expressing foreign antigen, such as immunization, plasmid DNA was purified by polyethylene vaccinia virus, adenovirus or Fowlpox have been used for glycol (PEG) precipitation as described previously (35). prime-boost vaccination. DNA- and vaccinia-based vaccines Briefly, cellular proteins were precipitated with one volume for a pre-erythrocytic malaria antigen that were delivered in of 7.5 M ammonium acetate followed by isopropanol precip- a prime-boost protocol induced 5- to 10-fold greater T-cell itation of the supernatant. After PEG precipitation, the plas- responses than each vaccine alone (29). In addition, gene- mid was extracted three times with phenol-chloroform and based vectors, such as replication-incompetent adenovirus, precipitated with pure ethanol. The DNA quality was checked have proven particularly effective in eliciting enhanced cellular by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel. The plasmid DNA and humoral immunities compared to either agent alone concentration was measured using a NanoDrop 2000 spec- (30,31). Replication-incompetent adenovirus has the ability to trophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientitific, Pittsburgh, PA). efficiently deliver antigens and express them at high levels in The amount of endotoxin was determined by the Limulus IMMUNE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Immunogenicity of Clinically Relevant SARS-Cov-2 Vaccines
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 September 2020 1 Immunogenicity of clinically relevant SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in non-human primates and humans P. J. Klasse (1,*), Douglas F. Nixon (2,*) and John P. Moore (1,+) 1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology; 2 Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065 *These authors contributed equally +Correspondence: [email protected] Short title: SARS-CoV-2 vaccine immunogenicity Key words: SARS-CoV-2, S-protein, RBD, COVID-19, neutralizing antibodies, serology, T- cells, vaccines, animal models, Operation Warp Speed © 2020 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 September 2020 2 Abstract Multiple preventive vaccines are being developed to counter the COVID-19 pandemic. The leading candidates have now been evaluated in non-human primates (NHPs) and human Phase 1 and/or Phase 2 clinical trials. Several vaccines have already advanced into Phase 3 efficacy trials, while others will do so before the end of 2020. Here, we summarize what is known of the antibody and T-cell immunogenicity of these vaccines in NHPs and humans. To the extent possible, we compare how the vaccines have performed, taking into account the use of different assays to assess immunogenicity and inconsistencies in how the resulting data are presented. We also summarize the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 challenge experiments in immunized macaques, while noting variations in the protocols used, including but not limited to the virus challenge doses. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 September 2020 3 Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic rages unabated and may continue to do so until there is a safe, effective and widely used protective vaccine.
    [Show full text]
  • Immunogenicity of a New Gorilla Adenovirus Vaccine Candidate for COVID-19
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.22.349951; this version posted October 22, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Immunogenicity of a new gorilla adenovirus vaccine candidate for COVID-19 Stefania Capone1,6, Angelo Raggioli1,6, Michela Gentile1, Simone Battella1, Armin Lahm1, Andrea Sommella1, Alessandra Maria Contino1, Richard A. Urbanowicz2,3,4, Romina Scala1, Federica Barra1, Adriano Leuzzi1, Eleonora Lilli1, Giuseppina Miselli1, Alessia Noto1, Maria Ferraiuolo1, Francesco Talotta1, Theocharis Tsoleridis2,3,4, Concetta Castilletti5, Giulia Matusali5, Francesca Colavita5, Daniele Lapa5, Silvia Meschi5, Maria Capobianchi5, Marco Soriani1, Antonella Folgori1, Jonathan K. Ball2,3,4, Stefano Colloca1 and Alessandra Vitelli1* 1 ReiThera Srl, Rome, Italy 2 School of Life Sciences, The University of Nottingham, UK 3 NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, The University of Nottingham, UK 4 Wolfson Centre for Emerging Virus Research, The University of Nottingham, UK 5 National Institute for Infectious Diseases "Lazzaro Spallanzani" IRCCS 6 These authors contributed equally * [email protected] ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the emergent SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus threatens global public health and there is an urgent need to develop safe and effective vaccines. Here we report the generation and the preclinical evaluation of a novel replication-defective gorilla adenovirus-vectored vaccine encoding the pre-fusion stabilized Spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV2. We show that our vaccine candidate, GRAd- COV2, is highly immunogenic both in mice and macaques, eliciting both functional antibodies which neutralize SARS-CoV-2 infection and block Spike protein binding to the ACE2 receptor, and a robust, Th1- dominated cellular response in the periphery and in the lung.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates in Development, Special Focus on Mrna and Viral Vector Platforms Dr
    To view an archived recording of this presentation please click the following link: http://pho.adobeconnect.com/pbwjspa1fh9a/ Please scroll down this file to view a copy of the slides from the session. Helpful tips when viewing the recording: • The default presentation format includes showing the “event index”. To close the events index, please click on the following icon and hit “close” • If you prefer to view the presentation in full screen mode, please click on the following icon in the top right hand corner of the share screen PublicHealthOntario.ca 2 COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates in Development, special focus on mRNA and viral vector platforms Dr. Marina Salvadori and Dr. April Killikelly Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, PHAC October 1, 2020 Disclosures • None of the presenters at this session have received financial support or in-kind support from a commercial sponsor. • None of the presenters have potential conflicts of interest to declare. 2 OBJECTIVE • Describe the mechanism of action of mRNA, viral vector and protein- based vaccines • Discuss the evidence available for vaccines in development that may be available in Canada if proved safe and effective 3 Global COVID-19 Vaccine Development Landscape: • As of September 24, 2020, 63 clinical trials have been registered for developmental vaccine candidates against COVID-19. • Two anti-SARS-COV-2 vaccine candidates have obtained regulatory authorization to initiate clinical trials in Canada and one vaccine candidate has begun clinical testing in Canada (Medicago). 4 Lead Candidate COVID-19 Vaccine Development Landscape: Protein-based (top box), viral vector based (middle box) and mRNA (bottom box) and technology constitute the majority of the front running COVID-19 vaccine technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Adenoviral Vector COVID-19 Vaccines: Process and Cost Analysis
    processes Article Adenoviral Vector COVID-19 Vaccines: Process and Cost Analysis Rafael G. Ferreira 1,* , Neal F. Gordon 2, Rick Stock 2 and Demetri Petrides 3 1 Intelligen Brasil, Sao Paulo 01227-200, Brazil 2 BDO USA, LLP, Boston, MA 02110, USA; [email protected] (N.F.G.); [email protected] (R.S.) 3 Intelligen, Inc., Scotch Plains, NJ 07076, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has motivated the rapid development of numerous vaccines that have proven effective against SARS-CoV-2. Several of these successful vaccines are based on the adenoviral vector platform. The mass manufacturing of these vaccines poses great challenges, especially in the context of a pandemic where extremely large quantities must be produced quickly at an affordable cost. In this work, two baseline processes for the production of a COVID-19 adenoviral vector vaccine, B1 and P1, were designed, simulated and economically evaluated with the aid of the software SuperPro Designer. B1 used a batch cell culture viral production step, with a viral titer of 5 × 1010 viral particles (VP)/mL in both stainless-steel and disposable equipment. P1 used a perfusion cell culture viral production step, with a viral titer of 1 × 1012 VP/mL in exclusively disposable equipment. Both processes were sized to produce 400 M/yr vaccine doses. P1 led to a smaller cost per dose than B1 ($0.15 vs. $0.23) and required a much smaller capital investment ($126 M vs. $299 M). The media and facility-dependent expenses were found to be the main contributors to the operating cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Protective Zika Vaccines Engineered to Eliminate Enhancement of Dengue Infection Via Immunodominance Switch
    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-021-00966-6 Protective Zika vaccines engineered to eliminate enhancement of dengue infection via immunodominance switch Lianpan Dai 1,2,3,8 ✉ , Kun Xu3,8, Jinhe Li2,4,8, Qingrui Huang5, Jian Song 1, Yuxuan Han2, Tianyi Zheng2,4, Ping Gao2,4, Xuancheng Lu6, Huabing Yang 5, Kefang Liu7, Qianfeng Xia3, Qihui Wang 1, Yan Chai1, Jianxun Qi 1, Jinghua Yan 5 ✉ and George F. Gao 1,2,4 ✉ Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is an important safety concern for vaccine development against dengue virus (DENV) and its antigenically related Zika virus (ZIKV) because vaccine may prime deleterious antibodies to enhance natural infections. Cross-reactive antibodies targeting the conserved fusion loop epitope (FLE) are known as the main sources of ADE. We design ZIKV immunogens engineered to change the FLE conformation but preserve neutralizing epitopes. Single vaccination conferred sterilizing immunity against ZIKV without ADE of DENV-serotype 1–4 infections and abrogated maternal–neonatal transmis- sion in mice. Unlike the wild-type-based vaccine inducing predominately cross-reactive ADE-prone antibodies, B cell profiling revealed that the engineered vaccines switched immunodominance to dispersed patterns without DENV enhancement. The crystal structure of the engineered immunogen showed the dimeric conformation of the envelope protein with FLE disruption. We provide vaccine candidates that will prevent both ZIKV infection and infection-/vaccination-induced DENV ADE. IKV is a mosquito-borne pathogen belonging to the genus models12,13,19,20. More importantly, a recent study of pediatric cohorts Flavivirus in the family Flaviviridae1. The 2015–2016 ZIKV in Nicaragua clearly shows that previous ZIKV infection enhanced epidemic spread to 84 countries worldwide, including future risk of DENV2 disease and severity, as well as DENV3 sever- Z2,3 21,22 China .
    [Show full text]
  • Prediction of the Supportive Vaccine Type of the Covid-19 for Public Health
    Available online at http://scik.org J. Math. Comput. Sci. 11 (2021), No. 5, 5703-5719 https://doi.org/10.28919/jmcs/5738 ISSN: 1927-5307 PREDICTION OF THE SUPPORTIVE VACCINE TYPE OF THE COVID-19 FOR PUBLIC HEALTH NISHANT NAMDEV, ARVIND KUMAR SINHA* Department of Mathematics, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, India Copyright © 2021 the author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract: The novel corona virus SARS-Cov-2 caused the COVID-19 pandemic and mostly deteriorated the respiratory system. This paper aims to predict the supportive vaccine type (RNA, Non-replicating viral vector, DNA, Inactivated, Protein subunit) of COVID-19 for the human being by the rough set's novel process. The Rough set is an approach to identify patterns in uncertainty. The vaccine dataset, vaccine name, number of tested cases, age, randomize, and vaccine types of COVID-19 have been taken to overcome this disaster. By the rough set method, the supportive vaccine pattern is predicted, and it is observed that the vaccine based on RNA is highly supported to the human beings compared to the others. Extensive tests explained the Pfizer vaccine (RNA) is 95% effective, Moderna (mRNA) is 94.1%, while the Oxford/AstraZeneca (Non-replicating) one is 62%. It shows that the efficiency obtained by the rough set is accurate. A data-intensive computer-based analysis is given for the medical system. Furthermore, we present an extended record of sources that will support the scientific bioinformatics society to attain various sorts of a database linked to SARS-CoV-2 and advances to associate with COVID-19 treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of India PIB Press Briefing 8Th December 2020 India: Covid-19 Snapshot (As on 8Th December)
    Government of India PIB Press Briefing 8th December 2020 India: Covid-19 Snapshot (As on 8th December) Total cases Active cases Deaths Tests 97.03 lakhs 3.83 lakhs 1.40 lakhs 14.8 crores Case Per Million Contribution Death Per Million Tests Per Million 7,031 3.96% 102 107,836 Case Positivity Case Fatality Rate 6.5% 3.2% 1.45% 1.3% (Overall) (Last 1 week) (Overall) (Last 1 week) Cases per million population – Amongst the lowest in the world 45,000 43,495 40,000 34,514 35,000 30,942 30,000 28,594 25,384 25,000 20,000 17,055 15,000 10,000 7,031 5,000 0 India Russia UK Italy Brazil France USA Source: WHO COVID-19 Dashboard updated 7th December 2020 Deaths per million population – Amongst the lowest in the world 993 1,000 902 900 830 839 842 800 700 600 500 400 298 300 200 102 100 0 India Russia Brazil France USA UK Italy Source: WHO COVID-19 Dashboard updated 7th December 2020 Deteriorating Situation in the World 44k USA 217k SPAIN TURKEY in Early - Dec in End - Nov 77k 32k in Mid - Aug 55k in Mid - April in Early - Nov 10k 5k in Early - April in Mid - April Mar May Jul Sep Nov Mar May Jul Sep Nov Mar May Jul Sep Nov 98k INDIA RUSSIA 28k UNITED KINGDOM 34k in Early - Sep in Early - Dec in Mid - Nov 11k in Early - May 6k in Early - April Mar May Jul Sep Nov Mar May Jul Sep Nov Mar May Jul Sep Nov FRANCE BRAZIL 55k 49k in Early - August 125k in Early - Dec in Mid - Nov 26k in End - April Country Trajectory as on 8th December 2020; Mar May Jul Sep Nov Mar May Jul Sep Nov Source: coronavirus.jhu.edu; India: Active cases continue to decline, now below 4 lakhs 10,03,299 10,00,000 8,12,390 8,00,000 6,97,330 5,61,908 6,00,000 3,73,379 3,83,866 4,00,000 2,00,000 0 Top States/UTs contributing to total active cases Active Cases Maharashtra 76,852 Kerala 59,607 Karnataka 24,786 West Bengal 23,829 Delhi 22,486 These 5 states contribute 54% of total active cases in the country COVID-19 Vaccination “I would like to tell my countrymen that our scientists are dutifully engaged in the laboratories.
    [Show full text]
  • Current and Future HPV Vaccines: Promise and Challenges
    Current and Future HPV Vaccines: Promise and Challenges 2006 1455 NW Leary Way Seattle, WA 98107-5136 USA Tel: 206.285.3500 Fax: 206.285.6619 www.path.org Copyright © 2006, Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH). All rights reserved. The material in this document may be freely used for educational or noncommercial purposes, provided that the material is accompanied by an acknowledgement line. Contents Abbreviations and acronyms....................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgments....................................................................................................................... 3 Executive summary..................................................................................................................... 4 Therapeutic vaccines ...............................................................................................................4 Introducing prophylactic HPV vaccines..................................................................................5 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 7 A. HPV-related disease............................................................................................................7 B. Prophylactic and therapeutic vaccine strategies..................................................................9 II. Prophylactic vaccine research ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy for COVID-19 Vaccination in India: the Country with the Second Highest Population and Number of Cases ✉ Velayudhan Mohan Kumar 1, Seithikurippu R
    www.nature.com/npjvaccines PERSPECTIVE OPEN Strategy for COVID-19 vaccination in India: the country with the second highest population and number of cases ✉ Velayudhan Mohan Kumar 1, Seithikurippu R. Pandi-Perumal 2 , Ilya Trakht3 and Sadras Panchatcharam Thyagarajan 4 Free vaccination against COVID-19 commenced in India on January 16, 2021, and the government is urging all of its citizens to be immunized, in what is expected to be the largest vaccination program in the world. Out of the eight COVID-19 vaccines that are currently under various stages of clinical trials in India, four were developed in the country. India’s drug regulator has approved restricted emergency use of Covishield (the name employed in India for the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine) and Covaxin, the home- grown vaccine produced by Bharat Biotech. Indian manufacturers have stated that they have the capacity to meet the country’s future needs for COVID-19 vaccines. The manpower and cold-chain infrastructure established before the pandemic are sufficient for the initial vaccination of 30 million healthcare workers. The Indian government has taken urgent measures to expand the country’s vaccine manufacturing capacity and has also developed an efficient digital system to address and monitor all the aspects of vaccine administration. npj Vaccines (2021) 6:60 ; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-021-00327-2 1234567890():,; INTRODUCTION eight vaccine candidates, currently undergoing clinical trials in A year has passed since the first case of novel coronavirus India, is shown in Table 1 and their technical details are given in 13 infections was detected in China’s Wuhan province.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Chimpanzee Adenovirus-Vectored Respiratory Mucosal Tuberculosis Vaccine: Overcoming Local Anti-Human Adenovirus Immunity for Potent TB Protection
    nature publishing group ARTICLES Novel chimpanzee adenovirus-vectored respiratory mucosal tuberculosis vaccine: overcoming local anti-human adenovirus immunity for potent TB protection M Jeyanathan1,3, N Thanthrige-Don1,3, S Afkhami1,3, R Lai1, D Damjanovic1, A Zganiacz1, X Feng1, X-D Yao1, KL Rosenthal1, M Fe Medina1, J Gauldie1, HC Ertl2 and Z Xing1 Pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) remains to be a major global health problem despite many decades of parenteral use of Bacillus Calmette–Gue´ rin (BCG) vaccine. Developing safe and effective respiratory mucosal TB vaccines represents a unique challenge. Over the past decade or so, the human serotype 5 adenovirus (AdHu5)-based TB vaccine has emerged as one of the most promising candidates based on a plethora of preclinical and early clinical studies. However, anti-AdHu5 immunity widely present in the lung of humans poses a serious gap and limitation to its real-world applications. In this study we have developed a novel chimpanzee adenovirus 68 (AdCh68)-vectored TB vaccine amenable to the respiratory route of vaccination. We have evaluated AdCh68-based TB vaccine for its safety, T-cell immunogenicity, and protective efficacy in relevant animal models of human pulmonary TB with or without parenteral BCG priming. We have also compared AdCh68-based TB vaccine with its AdHu5 counterpart in both naive animals and those with preexisting anti-AdHu5 immunity in the lung. We provide compelling evidence that AdCh68-based TB vaccine is not only safe when delivered to the respiratory tract but, importantly, is also superior to its AdHu5 counterpart in induction of T-cellresponses and immune protection, and limiting lung immunopathology in the presence of preexisting anti-AdHu5 immunity in the lung.
    [Show full text]
  • The BCG Vaccine for COVID-19: First Verdict and Future Directions
    MINI REVIEW published: 08 March 2021 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.632478 The BCG Vaccine for COVID-19: First Verdict and Future Directions Maria Gonzalez-Perez 1, Rodrigo Sanchez-Tarjuelo 2, Boris Shor 3, Estanislao Nistal-Villan 4,5 and Jordi Ochando 1,2* 1 Transplant Immunology Unit, Department of Immunology, National Center of Microbiology, Instituto De Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain, 2 Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States, 3 Manhattan BioSolutions, New York, NY, United States, 4 Microbiology Section, Departamento de Ciencias Farmacéuticas y de la Salud, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad San Pablo-Centro de Estudios Universitarios (CEU), Madrid, Spain, 5 Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Medicina Molecular Aplicada (IMMA), Universidad San Pablo-CEU, Madrid, Spain Despite of the rapid development of the vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), it will take several months to have enough doses and the proper infrastructure to vaccinate a good proportion of the world population. In this interim, the accessibility to the Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) may mitigate the pandemic impact in some countries and the BCG vaccine offers significant advantages and flexibility in the way clinical vaccines are administered. BCG vaccination is a highly cost-effective intervention against tuberculosis (TB) and many low-and lower-middle-income countries would likely have the infrastructure, Edited by: and health care personnel sufficiently familiar with the conventional TB vaccine to Jose Luis Subiza, mount full-scale efforts to administer novel BCG-based vaccine for COVID-19. This Inmunotek SL, Spain suggests the potential for BCG to overcome future barriers to vaccine roll-out in Reviewed by: the countries where health systems are fragile and where the effects of this new Christine Wong, Charité—Universitätsmedizin coronavirus could be catastrophic.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Risk Assessment of Recombinant Viral Vector Vaccines Against SARS-Cov-2
    Review Environmental Risk Assessment of Recombinant Viral Vector Vaccines against SARS-Cov-2 Aline Baldo * , Amaya Leunda, Nicolas Willemarck and Katia Pauwels Sciensano, Service Biosafety and Biotechnology, Rue Juliette Wytsmanstraat 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium; [email protected] (A.L.); [email protected] (N.W.); [email protected] (K.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +32-2642-52-69 Abstract: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative agent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Over the past months, considerable efforts have been put into developing effective and safe drugs and vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Various platforms are being used for the development of COVID-19 vaccine candidates: recombinant viral vectors, protein-based vaccines, nucleic acid-based vaccines, and inactivated/attenuated virus. Recombinant viral vector vaccine candidates represent a significant part of those vaccine candidates in clinical development, with two already authorised for use in the European Union and one currently under rolling review by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Since recombinant viral vector vaccine candidates are considered as genetically modified organisms (GMOs), their regulatory oversight includes besides an assessment of their quality, safety and efficacy, also an environmental risk assessment (ERA). The present article highlights the main characteristics of recombinant viral vector vaccine (candidates) against SARS-CoV-2 in the pipeline and discusses their features from an Citation: Baldo, A.; Leunda, A.; environmental risk point of view. Willemarck, N.; Pauwels, K. Environmental Risk Assessment of Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; recombinant viral vector vaccines; environmental risk assess- Recombinant Viral Vector Vaccines ment; vaccination; biosafety against SARS-Cov-2.
    [Show full text]