Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations 78029 pressure toward this end because result in greater long-term efficiency Monday, May 11, 2020, make the applicants know that only the best and effectiveness. Rather, the one-grant following correction: application in an MX group will win. policy better serves the policy goals of ■ 9. The Commission also rejects sections 152 and 303(g) by incentivizing On page 27852, in the second column, Discount Legal’s argument that ‘‘the better applications as well as amendatory instruction 2d is corrected idea than an applicant must be cooperative settlements that encourage to read as follows: dismissed because it is comparatively more intensive and higher quality use of § 171.7 [Corrected] inferior to an unqualified applicant spectrum. being dismissed’’ violates the Supreme 13. Established One-Grant Policy. d. Add paragraphs (w)(53), (62), (66), Court’s holding in Ashbacker Radio Finally, the Commission’s rejects (69), (71), (72), and (75) through (77); Corp. v. FCC. The Commission Discount Legal’s argument that the one- [FR Doc. C1–2020–06205 Filed 12–2–20; 8:45 am] previously considered and rejected this grant policy was not endorsed by the BILLING CODE 1301–00–D argument in a prior decision affirming Commission, but rather, originated with the one-grant policy and explained that the Bureau staff. The Commission Ashbacker ‘‘[does not] require the explains that Discount Legal’s Commission to engage in secondary characterization is directly at odds with DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR analyses of inferior applications simply the Commission’s explicit mandate in because they do not conflict with the the 2001 NCE Comparative MO&O, the Fish and Wildlife Service tentative selectee.’’ subsequent Commission decisions 10. Administrative Burdens. The stating that the Bureau correctly applied 50 CFR Part 17 Commission rejects Discount Legal’s the NCE Comparative MO&O, and the contention that the concern about Commission’s recent reaffirmation of administrative burdens ‘‘does not hold the one-grant policy in the 2019 Report [FF09E21000 FXES11110900000 212] up.’’ Discount Legal does not consider and Order. These decisions reflect that Endangered and Threatened Wildlife the extensive work required following it has been, and remains, the resolve of and Plants; Eleven Species Not the issuance of tentative selectee orders. the Commission—not the staff—that the The Commission explains that a Bureau process applications based on a Warranted for Listing as Endangered tentative selection is not final until the ‘‘one-grant’’ policy. or Threatened Species entire administrative process of resolving petitions to deny, and any Ordering Clauses AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, subsequent pleadings, is complete. 14. It is ordered that the Petition for Interior. Commission review of any petitions and Reconsideration filed on March 12, ACTION: Notification of findings. associated point audits is a weighty and 2020, by Discount Legal is dismissed, and alternatively and independently, is oftentimes lengthy process, requiring SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and denied. extensive analysis to determine the Wildlife Service (Service), announce status of every tentative selectee’s 15. It is further ordered that should no further petitions for reconsideration or findings that eleven species are not application and the merits of every warranted for listing as endangered or petition to deny. If a petition to deny is petitions for judicial review be timely threatened species under the granted, a new tentative selectee must filed, MB Docket No. 19–3 shall be Endangered Species Act of 1973, as be chosen, and petitions to deny must terminated, and its docket closed. amended (Act). After a thorough review again be entertained. Federal Communications Commission. 11. The one-grant policy incentivizes of the best available scientific and Marlene Dortch, commercial information, we find that it applicants to resolve mutual Secretary. exclusivities through the more is not warranted at this time to list the [FR Doc. 2020–23306 Filed 12–2–20; 8:45 am] expeditious settlement process, thereby Doll’s daisy, Puget Oregonian, Rocky accelerating new NCE service to the BILLING CODE 6712–01–P Mountain monkeyflower, southern public. The Commission rejects white-tailed ptarmigan, tidewater Discount Legal’s argument that it is amphipod, tufted puffin, Hamlin Valley irrational to allow multiple grants in an DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION pyrg, longitudinal gland pyrg, sub- MX group in the settlement context but globose snake pyrg, the Johnson Springs Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Wetland Complex population of relict not engage in secondary analysis Safety Administration through the point system. This dace, or Clear Lake hitch. However, we ask the public to submit to us at any argument does not account for the 49 CFR Parts 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, time any new information relevant to fundamentally different nature of the 176, 178 and 180 two conflict-resolution methods and the the status of any of the species time each process entails. [Docket No. PHMSA–2017–0108 (HM–215O)] mentioned above or their habitats. 12. The Commission also rejects the RIN 2137–AF32 DATES: The findings in this document argument that secondary grants would were made on December 3, 2020. better accomplish the section 152 and Hazardous Materials: Harmonization 303(g) statutory objectives of efficient With International Standards ADDRESSES: Detailed descriptions of the and effective radio use. The bases for these findings are available on Commission explains that simply Correction the internet at http:// granting as many applications as In rule document 2020–06205, www.regulations.gov under the possible in any given window will not beginning on page 27810, in the issue of following docket numbers: Species Docket No. Doll’s daisy ............................................................................................... FWS–R5–ES–2020–0066. Puget Oregonian ...................................................................................... FWS–R1–ES–2020–0067. VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Dec 02, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM 03DER1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES 78030 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations Species Docket No. Rocky Mountain monkeyflower ................................................................ FWS–R6–ES–2012–0052. Southern white-tailed ptarmigan ............................................................... FWS–R6–ES–2012–0023. Tidewater amphipod ................................................................................. FWS–R5–ES–2020–0068. Tufted puffin .............................................................................................. FWS–R7–ES–2020–0072. Hamlin Valley pyrg ................................................................................... FWS–R6–ES–2020–0069. Longitudinal gland pyrg ............................................................................ FWS–R6–ES–2020–0070. Sub-globose snake pyrg ........................................................................... FWS–R6–ES–2020–0071. Relict dace ................................................................................................ FWS–R8–ES–2020–0113. Clear Lake hitch ....................................................................................... FWS–R8–ES–2020–0112. Supporting information used to INFORMATION CONTACT. Please submit any under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION prepare this finding is available by new information, materials, comments, CONTACT. contacting the appropriate person as or questions concerning this finding to specified under FOR FURTHER the appropriate person, as specified FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Species Contact information Doll’s daisy ............................................................................................... Eric Schrading, Field Supervisor, New Jersey Field Office, (609) 382– 5272. Puget Oregonian ...................................................................................... Brad Thompson, State Supervisor, Washington Fish and Wildlife Of- fice, (360) 753–9440. Rocky Mountain monkeyflower ................................................................ Ann Timberman, Acting Field Supervisor, Colorado Ecological Services Field Office, (970) 628–7181. Southern white-tailed ptarmigan ............................................................... Ann Timberman, Acting Field Supervisor, Colorado Ecological Services Field Office, (970) 628–7181. Tidewater amphipod ................................................................................. Julie A. Slacum, Division Chief, Strategic Resource Conservation, Chesapeake Bay Field Office, (410) 573–4595. Tufted puffin .............................................................................................. Stewart Cogswell, Field Supervisor, Anchorage Fish and Wildlife Con- servation Office, (907) 271–2787. Hamlin Valley pyrg, longitudinal gland pyrg, and sub-globose snake Laura Romin, Deputy Field Supervisor, Utah Ecological Services Field pyrg. Office, (801) 975–3330, ext. 142. Relict dace ................................................................................................ Mark Jackson, Field Supervisor, Reno Fish and Wildlife Office, (775) 861–6300. Clear Lake hitch ....................................................................................... Kim Turner, Acting Field
Recommended publications
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Speckled Dace, Rhinichthys Osculus, in Canada, Prepared Under Contract with Environment and Climate Change Canada
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Speckled Dace Rhinichthys osculus in Canada ENDANGERED 2016 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2016. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Speckled Dace Rhinichthys osculus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 51 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Previous report(s): COSEWIC 2006. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the speckled dace Rhinichthys osculus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 27 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). COSEWIC 2002. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the speckled dace Rhinichthys osculus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 36 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Peden, A. 2002. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the speckled dace Rhinichthys osculus in Canada, in COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the speckled dace Rhinichthys osculus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-36 pp. Peden, A.E. 1980. COSEWIC status report on the speckled dace Rhinichthys osculus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. 1-13 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Andrea Smith (Hutchinson Environmental Sciences Ltd.) for writing the status report on the Speckled Dace, Rhinichthys osculus, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment and Climate Change Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph R. Tomelleri 28 27
    Nevada 29 34 35 32 2 31 30 3 1 33 20 18 6 4 19 5 8 17 16 12 7 23 15 24 9 21 25 22 10 26 14 13 11 41 36 39 40 38 37 Illustrations by JOSEPH R. TOMELLERI 28 27 N A T I V E F I S H E S O F N E V A D A G R O U P IN G S B Y F A M ILY KILLIFISHES ∙ Cyprinodontidae 11. Big Spring spinedace ∙ Lepidomeda mollispinis pratensis† POOLFISHES ∙ Empetrichthyidae 31. Mountain sucker ∙ Catostomus platyrhynchus 1. Devils Hole pupfish ∙ Cyprinodon diabolis* 12. Moapa dace ∙ Moapa coriacea* 22. Preston White River springfish ∙ Crenichthys baileyi albivallis 32. Warner sucker ∙ Catostomus warnerensis† 2. Ash Meadows Amargosa pupfish ∙ Cyprinodon nevadensis mionectes* 13. Woundfin ∙ Plagopterus argentissimus* 23. Hiko White River springfish ∙ Crenichthys baileyi grandis* 33. Wall Canyon sucker ∙ Catostomus sp. 3. Warm Springs Amargosa pupfish ∙ Cyprinodon nevadensis pectoralis* 14. Colorado pikeminnow ∙ Ptychocheilus lucius* 24. Moapa White River springfish ∙ Crenichthys baileyi moapae 34. Cui-ui ∙ Chasmistes cujus* 25. Railroad Valley springfish ∙ Crenichthys nevadae† 35. Razorback sucker ∙ Xyrauchen texanus* MINNOWS ∙ Cyprinidae 15. Northern pikeminnow ∙ Ptychocheilus oregonesis 26. Pahrump poolfish ∙ Empetrichthys latos* 4. Desert dace ∙ Eremichthys acros† 16. Relict dace ∙ Relictus solitarius TROU T S ∙ Salmonidae 17. Moapa speckled dace ∙ Rhinichthys osculus moapae 5. Humpback chub ∙ Gila cypha* S CUL P INS ∙ Cottidae 36. Mountain whitefish ∙ Prosopium williamsoni 18. Ash Meadows speckled dace ∙ Rhinichthys osculus nevadensis* † 6. Bonytail chub ∙ Gila elegans* 27. Mottled sculpin ∙ Cottus bairdii 37. Lahontan cutthroat trout ∙ Onchorhynchus clarkii henshawi 19. White River speckled dace ∙ Rhinichthys osculus ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Riverscape Genetics Identifies Speckled Dace (Rhinichthys Osculus) Cryptic Diversity in the Klamath–Trinity Basin
    Conserv Genet DOI 10.1007/s10592-017-1027-6 RESEARCH ARTICLE Riverscape genetics identifies speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus) cryptic diversity in the Klamath–Trinity Basin Jesse C. Wiesenfeld1,2 · Damon H. Goodman3 · Andrew P. Kinziger1 Received: 26 December 2016 / Accepted: 5 November 2017 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017 Abstract Cataloging biodiversity is of great importance is unknown. The present study highlights the importance of given that habitat destruction has dramatically increased incorporating molecular analysis into biodiversity research extinction rates. While the presence of cryptic species poses to uncover cryptic diversity. We recommend that future challenges for biodiversity assessment, molecular analysis biodiversity inventories recognize three genetically distinct has proven useful in uncovering this hidden diversity. Using groups of speckled dace in the Klamath–Trinity Basin. nuclear microsatellite markers and mitochondrial DNA we investigated the genetic structure of Klamath speckled dace Keywords Riverscape genetics · Cryptic species · (Rhinichthys osculus klamathensis), a subspecies endemic Speckled dace · Rhinichthys osculus to the Klamath–Trinity basin. Analysis of 25 sample sites within the basin uncovered cryptic diversity including three distinct genetic groups: (1) a group that is widely distributed Introduction throughout the Klamath River mainstem and its tributar- ies, (2) a group distributed in the Trinity River, the largest Biodiversity is being lost at an astonishing rate due to forces tributary to the Klamath River, and (3) a group identified associated with human population growth, habitat alteration above a 10 m waterfall in Jenny Creek, a small tributary to and global climate change (McNeely et al. 1990; Chapin the Klamath River.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater And
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • California's Freshwater Biodiversity
    CALIFORNIA’S FRESHWATER BIODIVERSITY IN A CONTINENTAL CONTEXT Science for Conservation Technical Brief November 2009 Department of Conservation Science The Nature Conservancy, California Freshwater Biodiversity in California 2 California’s Freshwater Ecoregions in a Continental Context A Science for Conservation Technical Brief The Nature Conservancy, California The Freshwater Conservation Challenge Worldwide, freshwater species and habitats are, on average, more imperiled than their terrestrial or marine counterparts. In continental North America alone, 40% of freshwater fish are at risk of extinction or already extinct (Jelks et al. 2008). Despite concerns over the health of the world’s freshwater species and systems (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005), there have been few attempts to systematically describe patterns of freshwater biodiversity on Earth. This is due in part to the lack of comprehensive, synthesized data on the distributions of freshwater species (Abell 2008). Without a robust biodiversity foundation, conservationists face challenges in setting freshwater protection priorities and agendas at the global, continental and regional scales. Freshwater Ecoregions of the World Project To fill this void, in 2008, World Wildlife Fund-US, The Nature Conservancy, and more than 130 scientists participated in the Freshwater Ecoregions of the World (FEOW) project. FEOW identified 426 freshwater ecoregions and provided information on freshwater biogeography and biodiversity; similar analyses exist for the terrestrial and marine realms. Until this effort, global biodiversity classification and planning efforts had been characterized using land-based parameters. FEOW is the first attempt to describe the world from a freshwater perspective. With this information, scientists and conservationists can more clearly compare freshwater biota and their conservation needs across large geographies.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior
    United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Nevada Fish and Wildlife Office 4701 North Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89130 Ph: (702) 515-5230 ~ Fax: (702) 515-5231 July 9,2008 File Nos. 84320-2008-F-0078, 84320-2008-1-0079 and 84320-2008-TA-0080 Memorandum To: District Manager, Ely District Office, Bureau of Land Management, Ely, Nevada From: Field Supervisor, Nevada Fish and Wildlife Office, Reno, Nevada Subject: Programmatic Biological Opinion, Informal Consultation, and Technical Assistance for Implementation of Actions Proposed in the Ely Proposed Resource Management Plan, Lincoln, White Pine, and Portions ofNye Counties, Nevada The attached programmatic biological opinion (Attachment 1, File No. 84320-2008-F-0078) is based on our review of programmatic activities proposed for implementation by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), as described in your October 2007 biological assessment (BA; BLM 2007a), in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and potential effects on: • the threatened Mojave desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) and its designated critical habitat; • the threatened Big Spring spinedace (Lepidomeda mollispinis pratensis) and its designated critical habitat; • the endangered White River springfish (Crenichthys baileyi baileyi) and its designated critical habitat; • the endangered Pahrump poolfish (Empetrichthys latos); and • the endangered southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax trail/ii extimus). BLM, in coordination with the Service, determined that implementation of activities associated with at least one program may result in adverse effects to the five species identified above (Table 1). The effects determination in Table 1 changed from the effects determination identified in the BA as a result of discussions of the proposed action between BLM and Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3A, Life Histories of Biota of Concern 1 Appendix 3A
    Appendix 3A, Life Histories of Biota of Concern 1 Appendix 3A. Brief life histories for biota of concern: Aquatic invertebrates, fishes, and plants Life history attributes are critical to the analysis and characterization of risk associated with biota transfers, be those biological invasions or shifts in metapopulations that are potentially influenced by interbasin water diversions. While a comprehensive characterization of life history for each biota of concern is precluded by the scope of this investigation and number of biota of concern identified during problem formulation, the life histories that follow are focused on invasive attributes, historical accounts of past invasions, and the current distribution of the species. Existing literature sources in the scientific literature and peer-reviewed public domain provide ample background on each species of interest to the current investigation, with natural resource agencies and the applied research community having disseminated a wealth of data and information for use in these initial investigations of risks associated with biota transfers potentially resulting from interbasin water diversions. An ability to successfully translocate and accommodate to “new territory” is highly variable across species. Invasiveness depends on attributes related to physiological tolerance, and morphological and behavioral traits that directly or indirectly influence reproductive fitness of the species, thus enabling a species to establish and maintain sustainable populations in a region outside its current
    [Show full text]
  • Riverscape Genetics Identifies a Cryptic Lineage of Speckled
    RIVERSCAPE GENETICS IDENTIFIES A CRYPTIC LINEAGE OF SPECKLED DACE (RHINICHTHYS OSCULUS) IN THE KLAMATH-TRINITY BASIN By Jesse C. Wiesenfeld A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Humboldt State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Natural Resources: Fisheries Committee Membership Dr. Andrew Kinziger, Committee Chair Dr. Bret Harvey, Committee Member Dr. Timothy Mulligan, Committee Member Dr. Alison O'Dowd, Graduate Coordinator December 2014 ABSTRACT RIVERSCAPE GENETICS IDENTIFIES A CRYPTIC LINEAGE OF SPECKLED DACE (RHINICHTHYS OSCULUS) IN THE KLAMATH-TRINITY BASIN Jesse Wiesenfeld Cataloging biodiversity is of utmost importance given that habitat destruction has dramatically increased extinction rates. While the presence of cryptic species poses challenges for biodiversity assessment, molecular analysis has proven useful in uncovering this hidden diversity. Using nuclear microsatellite markers and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), I investigated the genetic structure of Klamath speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus klamathensis), a subspecies endemic to the Klamath-Trinity Basin. Analysis of 25 populations within the basin uncovered a cryptic lineage of speckled dace restricted to the Trinity River system and a possible contact zone between this lineage and speckled dace occurring in the Klamath Basin. The extent of mtDNA divergence between the Klamath and Trinity speckled dace was consistent with levels observed between sibling fish species (~3%). Trinity River system populations exhibited significantly lower levels of microsatellite genetic diversity (He=0.49, Ar=9.46) compared to Klamath Basin populations (He=0.64, Ar=12.35). Levels of hybridization between the lineages appeared to be low and confined to areas near the confluence of the Klamath and Trinity Rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • American Fisheries Society • Conservation
    VOL 33 NO 8 AUGUST 2008 Fish News Legislative Update Fisheries Journal Highlights FisheriesAmerican Fisheries Society • www.fisheries.org Calendar Job Center Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes AFS ANNUAL REPORT Fisheries • v o l 33 n o 8 • a u g u s t 2008 • w w w .f i s h e r i e s .o r g 365 Bermuda’s Beauties Squid are mysterious and beautiful. Although relatively little is known about their growth and life histories, squid are an important source of food for many animals, and support expanding fisheries. Oceanic squid migrate long distances, and these delicate creatures are challenging to rear in captivity. These characteristics make squid hard to study, and because they are susceptible to handling mortality, they have been uncommonly difficult to tag. Dr. James Wood and his student Suzanne Replinger at the Bermuda Biological Station for Research developed a new method to directly measure size and temperature specific growth rates of individual wild squid Above: Caribbean Reef Squid. Below left: using Northwest Marine Technology’s 1 Batch or individual codes can be made for Visible Implant Elastomer (VIE) Tags . squid by combining tag locations and colors. VIE was injected into the mantles of The fluorescent properties of the VIE tags Caribbean reef squid Sepioteuthis make them easy to see. Below right: Dr. Northwest Marine Technology, sepioidea, with four marks per Wood and his students captured squid by Inc. seining in the shallow waters of Bermuda individual. The squid were kept in and then held them for tagging in a portable captivity to measure tag retention before net.
    [Show full text]
  • Micropterus Salmoides) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, February 2019 Web Version, 8/26/2019 Photo: Robert Pos – U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Public domain – government work. 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “North America: St. Lawrence - Great Lakes, and Mississippi River basins from southern Quebec to Minnesota and south to Gulf; Atlantic and Gulf drainages from North Carolina to Florida and to northern Mexico.” Status in the United States Froese and Pauly (2019a) list Micropterus salmoides as introduced in Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, and Hawaii. 1 From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Introduced to freshwater ponds [in the U.S. Virgin Islands] and grows to at least 15 lbs; […]” “The northern strain of largemouth bass is the form found in Hawaii; they occur primarily in reservoirs, frequenting areas with cover like vegetated areas, submerged logs, and boulders [Yamamoto and Tagawa 2000].” From GISD (2017): “Largemouth bass were stocked in Fena Lake [Guam] by the Navy in 1955. Growth was initially quite good but they did not survive, perhaps because they were fished out or possibly they could not reproduce because of a lack of suitable habitat.” According to Fuller and Neilson (2019), nonindigenous occurrences of Micropterus salmoides have been reported in the following States, with range of years and hydrologic units in parentheses: Alaska (2018; Anchorage) Arizona (1880-2013; Aqua Fria, Big Chino-Williamson Valley,
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography and Riverscape Genetics of Speckled Dace (Rhinichthys Osculus) in Western North America Steven Michael Mussmann University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 12-2018 Diversification Across a Dynamic Landscape: Phylogeography and Riverscape Genetics of Speckled Dace (Rhinichthys osculus) in Western North America Steven Michael Mussmann University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Bioinformatics Commons, and the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Mussmann, Steven Michael, "Diversification Across a Dynamic Landscape: Phylogeography and Riverscape Genetics of Speckled Dace (Rhinichthys osculus) in Western North America" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 2969. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2969 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Diversification Across a Dynamic Landscape: Phylogeography and Riverscape Genetics of Speckled Dace (Rhinichthys osculus) in Western North America A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biological Sciences by Steven Mussmann Iowa State University Bachelor of Science in Anthropology, 2005 Colorado State University Bachelor of Science in Biology, 2008 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Master of Science in Biology, 2011 December 2018 University of Arkansas The dissertation is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. Michael E. Douglas, Ph.D. Dissertation Director Marlis R. Douglas, Ph.D. Dissertation Co-Director David P. Philipp, Ph.D. Andrew J. Alverson, Ph.D. Committee Member Committee Member Abstract Evolution occurs at various spatial and temporal scales. For example, speciation may occur in historic time, whereas localized adaptation is more contemporary.
    [Show full text]