Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations 78029 pressure toward this end because result in greater long-term efficiency Monday, May 11, 2020, make the applicants know that only the best and effectiveness. Rather, the one-grant following correction: application in an MX group will win. policy better serves the policy goals of ■ 9. The Commission also rejects sections 152 and 303(g) by incentivizing On page 27852, in the second column, Discount Legal’s argument that ‘‘the better applications as well as amendatory instruction 2d is corrected idea than an applicant must be cooperative settlements that encourage to read as follows: dismissed because it is comparatively more intensive and higher quality use of § 171.7 [Corrected] inferior to an unqualified applicant spectrum. being dismissed’’ violates the Supreme 13. Established One-Grant Policy. d. Add paragraphs (w)(53), (62), (66), Court’s holding in Ashbacker Radio Finally, the Commission’s rejects (69), (71), (72), and (75) through (77); Corp. v. FCC. The Commission Discount Legal’s argument that the one- [FR Doc. C1–2020–06205 Filed 12–2–20; 8:45 am] previously considered and rejected this grant policy was not endorsed by the BILLING CODE 1301–00–D argument in a prior decision affirming Commission, but rather, originated with the one-grant policy and explained that the Bureau staff. The Commission Ashbacker ‘‘[does not] require the explains that Discount Legal’s Commission to engage in secondary characterization is directly at odds with DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR analyses of inferior applications simply the Commission’s explicit mandate in because they do not conflict with the the 2001 NCE Comparative MO&O, the Fish and Wildlife Service tentative selectee.’’ subsequent Commission decisions 10. Administrative Burdens. The stating that the Bureau correctly applied 50 CFR Part 17 Commission rejects Discount Legal’s the NCE Comparative MO&O, and the contention that the concern about Commission’s recent reaffirmation of administrative burdens ‘‘does not hold the one-grant policy in the 2019 Report [FF09E21000 FXES11110900000 212] up.’’ Discount Legal does not consider and Order. These decisions reflect that Endangered and Threatened Wildlife the extensive work required following it has been, and remains, the resolve of and Plants; Eleven Species Not the issuance of tentative selectee orders. the Commission—not the staff—that the The Commission explains that a Bureau process applications based on a Warranted for Listing as Endangered tentative selection is not final until the ‘‘one-grant’’ policy. or Threatened Species entire administrative process of resolving petitions to deny, and any Ordering Clauses AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, subsequent pleadings, is complete. 14. It is ordered that the Petition for Interior. Commission review of any petitions and Reconsideration filed on March 12, ACTION: Notification of findings. associated point audits is a weighty and 2020, by Discount Legal is dismissed, and alternatively and independently, is oftentimes lengthy process, requiring SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and denied. extensive analysis to determine the Wildlife Service (Service), announce status of every tentative selectee’s 15. It is further ordered that should no further petitions for reconsideration or findings that eleven species are not application and the merits of every warranted for listing as endangered or petition to deny. If a petition to deny is petitions for judicial review be timely threatened species under the granted, a new tentative selectee must filed, MB Docket No. 19–3 shall be Endangered Species Act of 1973, as be chosen, and petitions to deny must terminated, and its docket closed. amended (Act). After a thorough review again be entertained. Federal Communications Commission. 11. The one-grant policy incentivizes of the best available scientific and Marlene Dortch, commercial information, we find that it applicants to resolve mutual Secretary. exclusivities through the more is not warranted at this time to list the [FR Doc. 2020–23306 Filed 12–2–20; 8:45 am] expeditious settlement process, thereby Doll’s daisy, Puget Oregonian, Rocky accelerating new NCE service to the BILLING CODE 6712–01–P Mountain monkeyflower, southern public. The Commission rejects white-tailed ptarmigan, tidewater Discount Legal’s argument that it is amphipod, tufted puffin, Hamlin Valley irrational to allow multiple grants in an DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION pyrg, longitudinal gland pyrg, sub- MX group in the settlement context but globose snake pyrg, the Johnson Springs Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Wetland Complex population of relict not engage in secondary analysis Safety Administration through the point system. This dace, or Clear Lake hitch. However, we ask the public to submit to us at any argument does not account for the 49 CFR Parts 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, time any new information relevant to fundamentally different nature of the 176, 178 and 180 two conflict-resolution methods and the the status of any of the species time each process entails. [Docket No. PHMSA–2017–0108 (HM–215O)] mentioned above or their habitats. 12. The Commission also rejects the RIN 2137–AF32 DATES: The findings in this document argument that secondary grants would were made on December 3, 2020. better accomplish the section 152 and Hazardous Materials: Harmonization 303(g) statutory objectives of efficient With International Standards ADDRESSES: Detailed descriptions of the and effective radio use. The bases for these findings are available on Commission explains that simply Correction the internet at http:// granting as many applications as In rule document 2020–06205, www.regulations.gov under the possible in any given window will not beginning on page 27810, in the issue of following docket numbers: Species Docket No. Doll’s daisy ............................................................................................... FWS–R5–ES–2020–0066. Puget Oregonian ...................................................................................... FWS–R1–ES–2020–0067. VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Dec 02, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM 03DER1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES 78030 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations Species Docket No. Rocky Mountain monkeyflower ................................................................ FWS–R6–ES–2012–0052. Southern white-tailed ptarmigan ............................................................... FWS–R6–ES–2012–0023. Tidewater amphipod ................................................................................. FWS–R5–ES–2020–0068. Tufted puffin .............................................................................................. FWS–R7–ES–2020–0072. Hamlin Valley pyrg ................................................................................... FWS–R6–ES–2020–0069. Longitudinal gland pyrg ............................................................................ FWS–R6–ES–2020–0070. Sub-globose snake pyrg ........................................................................... FWS–R6–ES–2020–0071. Relict dace ................................................................................................ FWS–R8–ES–2020–0113. Clear Lake hitch ....................................................................................... FWS–R8–ES–2020–0112. Supporting information used to INFORMATION CONTACT. Please submit any under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION prepare this finding is available by new information, materials, comments, CONTACT. contacting the appropriate person as or questions concerning this finding to specified under FOR FURTHER the appropriate person, as specified FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Species Contact information Doll’s daisy ............................................................................................... Eric Schrading, Field Supervisor, New Jersey Field Office, (609) 382– 5272. Puget Oregonian ...................................................................................... Brad Thompson, State Supervisor, Washington Fish and Wildlife Of- fice, (360) 753–9440. Rocky Mountain monkeyflower ................................................................ Ann Timberman, Acting Field Supervisor, Colorado Ecological Services Field Office, (970) 628–7181. Southern white-tailed ptarmigan ............................................................... Ann Timberman, Acting Field Supervisor, Colorado Ecological Services Field Office, (970) 628–7181. Tidewater amphipod ................................................................................. Julie A. Slacum, Division Chief, Strategic Resource Conservation, Chesapeake Bay Field Office, (410) 573–4595. Tufted puffin .............................................................................................. Stewart Cogswell, Field Supervisor, Anchorage Fish and Wildlife Con- servation Office, (907) 271–2787. Hamlin Valley pyrg, longitudinal gland pyrg, and sub-globose snake Laura Romin, Deputy Field Supervisor, Utah Ecological Services Field pyrg. Office, (801) 975–3330, ext. 142. Relict dace ................................................................................................ Mark Jackson, Field Supervisor, Reno Fish and Wildlife Office, (775) 861–6300. Clear Lake hitch ....................................................................................... Kim Turner, Acting Field