Generations, Legitimacy, and Political Ideas in China: the End Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Generations, Legitimacy, and Political Ideas in China: the End Of GENERATIONS, LEGITIMACY, AND POLITICAL IDEAS IN CHINA The End of Polarization or the End of Ideology? Nora Sausmikat Abstract This paper investigates the relationship between political ideas and life stories, i.e., the influence of biographical learning on political orientation. It focuses on the political discussions among intellectuals and politicians who belong to the birth cohort of the late 1940s and early 1950s, the so called Zhiqing genera- tion, and describes embedded and developed stereotypes of political identity and legitimation. This paper investigates the relationship between political ideas and life stories—the social and historical foundations of some seem- ingly new political ideas with the prefix “neo-” currently being discussed by intellectuals in the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The analysis is based on interviews the author conducted in 1994, 1996, 2000, and 2001 and the study of writings of intellectuals of the ex-Red Guard and Zhiqing genera- Dr. Phil. Nora Sausmikat is a Research Associate at the University of Duisburg-Essen, Department of Political Science/East Asian Studies, Duisburg, Germany. Email: [email protected]. A draft of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Asian Studies in Chicago in March 2001 and at the International Convention of Asian Scholars (ICAS) 2 conference in Berlin in August 2001. The author would like to thank all interviewees for their frankness and openness during the interview series. She also greatly respects valuable advice given during the revision process by Lowell Dittmer, Carol Lee Hamrin, David Fraser, Jonathan Unger, Timothy Gluckman, He Baogang, and the anonymous reviewers. Asian Survey , 43:2, pp. 352–384. ISSN: 0004–4687 Ó 2003 by The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Send Requests for Permission to Reprint to: Rights and Permissions, University of California Press, Journals Division, 2000 Center St., Ste. 303, Berkeley, CA 94704–1223. 352 NORA SAUSMIKAT 353 tion.1 I base my conclusion upon my Ph.D. thesis on the autobiographical reflections of members of the Zhiqing generation and on findings I made during a current research project on political reform and democratization in China. In my dissertation I was concerned with the salient issues and major events in the lives of that generation; going a bit further, this paper tries to link this knowledge to current movements among intellectuals. The concept of “generations” seems to be a very useful category to analyze the way people reflect on their national history. Also, in the field of social and political transformation, research into generations is very much in vogue.2 In the field of post-war Estonian or Russian political thought, the biographical perspective on societies seems to find worldwide interest. In the China field, the study of different generations of intellectuals has a long his- tory. Benjamin Schwartz was one of the promoters of the study of intellec- tual and political history. He pointed to the “concrete experience of intellectuals within any given society” and to the “concrete specificities of history”: “In China, the end of the examination system in 1905, the Japanese incursion into China . —to mention certain events at random—are specific historic movements which must figure in any effort to understand the exper- iences and the responses of Chinese intellectuals within the time period with which we are concerned.”3 What Schwartz called the “transitional genera- tion,” with leading figures such as Kang Youwei, Yan Fu, Liang Qichao, et al., is characterized by their assimilation of Western theories and their own versions of Rousseau, the French Revolution, and contemporaneous Russian revolutionary thought. Schwartz began the fruitful inquiry of the study of intellectuals in non-Western societies and their role in periods of political transition. But this term is also a political one and brings with it the danger of ideo- logical generalizations. If national disputes refer to the generation of “person so-and-so,” usually this is an instrument to reflect on a sensitive issue of the 1.The full term reads “zhishi qingnian ,” which means literally “youth with knowledge” refers to the educated youth aged between 14 and 20 who were sent down to the countryside for reeducation during the Cultural Revolution. 2.Donatella Della Porta, “Life Histories in the Analysis of Social Movement Activists,” in Mario Diani and Ron Eyermann, eds., Studying Social Movements (London: Sage, 1992), pp. 168–193; Kathleen Blee, “Becoming a Racist: Women in Contemporary Ku Klux Klan and Neo- Nazi Groups,” Gender and Society 10 (1996), pp. 680–702; Roswitha Breckner et al., Biogra- phies and the Division of Europe: Experience, Action and Change on the ‘Eastern Side’ (Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 2000); Ingrid Miethe, Silke Roth, eds., Politische Biografien und sozialer Wandel [Political Biographies and Political Change] (Gie en: Psychosozial-Verlag, 2000). 3.Benjamin Schwartz, “The Limits of ‘Tradition Versus Modernity‘: The Case of the Chinese Intellectuals,” in Schwartz, China and Other Matters (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972/ 1996, pp. 45–64), p. 55. 354 ASIAN SURVEY, VOL. XLIII, NO. 2, MARCH/APRIL 2003 national past. But does one man like German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer represent the ‘68 generation in Germany? 4 Or was the anti-Vietnam cohort in the United States a homogenous group? The answers are undoubt- edly negative. Does the concept of political generations help in understand- ing history, or is the use of the term “generation” merely a discourse strategy tied to political power and legitimacy? In answering these questions, this paper focuses on the ex-Red Guard/ Zhiqing generation. Since the Cultural Revolution (CR) of 1966–76, the term “generation” has become one of the most important aspects of Chinese politics.5 On the one hand, members of this generation formed strong collec- tive bonds during their odyssey from the 1960s to the present. On the other hand, we can observe how members of the so-called Zhiqing or Laosanjie (old three classes) 6 try to differentiate themselves from each other, try to find their own individual place in a politicized community of ex-Cultural Revolu- tion players that became strongly exploited by the government during the 1990s. Some critics see already in the use of the term “generation” a power propaganda effort that tries to mobilize people to cultivate communist ethics and support the neo-conservative power elite that aimed for stabilization after the Tiananmen massacre, as discussed below. 7 Focusing on the political con- cepts and ideas inside the political reform debate presented by some intellec- tuals of this generation, the origin and substance of these ideas will be analyzed before the background of their historical reflections. During the last few years, debates and articles have emerged that try to categorize the differ- ent trends and discussions among intellectuals about political reform. Schol- ars inside and outside China try to grasp the new discourses by establishing categories like the “New Left” ( xin zuopai) or the “New Right” ( xin youpai), neo-conservatism ( xin baoshou zhuyi ), neo-authoritarianism ( xin quanwei zhuyi), neo-(or revived) liberalism ( xin ziyou zhuyi ), cultural traditionalism (Confucianism), and nationalism. Probably one can add more categories. 8 It 4.The dispute in 2000 about the German foreign minister, Joschka Fischer, and his activities in the late 1960s was meant to discredit the minister by the opposition Christian Democrats because of his involvement in the student left movements of 1968. 5.Michael Yahuda, “Political Generations in China ,” China Quarterly No. 80 (1979), pp. 793–805, here p. 794. 6.Laosanjie translates into “old three school classes” and refers to the high school graduates of the classes 1966–68 who were the main target of the rustication mass movement during the Cultural Revolution. Students were aged between 14 and 20. 7.Zilin Dong in Jiang Wang, Jiehou Huihuang: Zai Monan Zhong Jueqi de Zhiqing, Laosanjie, Gongheguo de Sandairen [The Glory after Derailment: Emergence from the Suffering of the Zhiqing, Laosanjie, and the Third Generation of the People’s Republic of China] (Beijing: Guangmin ribao chubanshe, 1995), pp. 172–181. 8.See for example Werner Meissner, “New Intellectual Currents in the People’s Republic of China,” in David Teather and Herbert Yee, eds., China in Transition (London: Macmillan Press, NORA SAUSMIKAT 355 will be argued that despite the heated discussions about the new “isms,” we can observe many “old” traits among them and we can formulate some com- mon structures in the political debate. We will find attitudes toward legiti- macy of power similar to those we know from the first to the third generation of leaders (the first generation of political leaders is associated with Mao Zedong, the second with Deng Xiaoping and the third with Jiang Zemin; talking about age cohorts, the “Fourth generation of leadership” refers to the “third echelon of leaders” under Jiang Zemin). As in the past, the concept of generation is still used to classify and legiti- mize political ideas and their meaning for Chinese history. Applying Mann- heim’s term “generation” illuminates the discussion as to whether the current, diversified political discussions between some intellectuals of the Red Guard/ Zhiqing generation show an inner linkage among them. I.The Concept of Generation: The Red Guard/Zhiqing Generation The social
Recommended publications
  • Journal of East Asian Libraries, No. 165, October 2017
    Journal of East Asian Libraries Volume 2017 | Number 165 Article 1 10-2017 Journal of East Asian Libraries, No. 165, October 2017 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jeal BYU ScholarsArchive Citation (2017) "Journal of East Asian Libraries, No. 165, October 2017," Journal of East Asian Libraries: Vol. 2017 : No. 165 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jeal/vol2017/iss165/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the All Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of East Asian Libraries by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of East Asian Libraries Journal of the Council on East Asian Libraries No. 165, October 2017 CONTENTS From the President 3 Essay A Tribute to John Yung-Hsiang Lai 4 Eugene W. Wu Peer-Review Articles An Overview of Predatory Journal Publishing in Asia 8 Jingfeng Xia, Yue Li, and Ping Situ Current Situation and Challenges of Building a Japanese LGBTQ Ephemera Collection at Yale Haruko Nakamura, Yoshie Yanagihara, and Tetsuyuki Shida 19 Using Data Visualization to Examine Translated Korean Literature 36 Hyokyoung Yi and Kyung Eun (Alex) Hur Managing Changes in Collection Development 45 Xiaohong Chen Korean R me for the Library of Congress to Stop Promoting Mccune-Reischauer and Adopt the Revised Romanization Scheme? 57 Chris Dollŏmaniz’atiŏn: Is It Finally Ti Reports Building a “One- 85 Paul W. T. Poon hour Library Circle” in China’s Pearl River Delta Region with the Curator of the Po Leung Kuk Museum 87 Patrick Lo and Dickson Chiu Interview 1 Web- 93 ProjectCollecting Report: Social Media Data from the Sina Weibo Api 113 Archiving Chinese Social Media: Final Project Report New Appointments 136 Book Review 137 Yongyi Song, Editor-in-Chief:China and the Maoist Legacy: The 50th Anniversary of the Cultural Revolution文革五十年:毛泽东遗产和当代中国.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary China: a Book List
    PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: Woodrow Wilson School, Politics Department, East Asian Studies Program CONTEMPORARY CHINA: A BOOK LIST by Lubna Malik and Lynn White Winter 2007-2008 Edition This list is available on the web at: http://www.princeton.edu/~lynn/chinabib.pdf which can be viewed and printed with an Adobe Acrobat Reader. Variation of font sizes may cause pagination to differ slightly in the web and paper editions. No list of books can be totally up-to-date. Please surf to find further items. Also consult http://www.princeton.edu/~lynn/chinawebs.doc for clicable URLs. This list of items in English has several purposes: --to help advise students' course essays, junior papers, policy workshops, and senior theses about contemporary China; --to supplement the required reading lists of courses on "Chinese Development" and "Chinese Politics," for which students may find books to review in this list; --to provide graduate students with a list that may suggest books for paper topics and may slightly help their study for exams in Chinese politics; a few of the compiler's favorite books are starred on the list, but not much should be made of this because such books may be old or the subjects may not meet present interests; --to supplement a bibliography of all Asian serials in the Princeton Libraries that was compiled long ago by Frances Chen and Maureen Donovan; many of these are now available on the web,e.g., from “J-Stor”; --to suggest to book selectors in the Princeton libraries items that are suitable for acquisition; to provide a computerized list on which researchers can search for keywords of interests; and to provide a resource that many teachers at various other universities have also used.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the British Association for Chinese Studies, Vol
    Journal of the British Association for Chinese Studies, Vol. 6 November 2016 ISSN 2048-0601 © British Association for Chinese Studies Gorbachev’s Glasnost and the Debate on Chinese Socialism among Chinese Sovietologists, 1985-1999 Jie Li University of Edinburgh Abstract Mikhail Gorbachev’s glasnost (openness) was a popular topic in 1980s China. Existing scholarship remarks that Chinese Soviet-watchers admired Gorbachev’s programme as a model for China’s democratisation in the 1980s. However, after 1991, because of their impact on China’s pro-democracy movement, as perceived by the Chinese government, the same Chinese scholars consistently criticised Gorbachev and his liberalisation policies for being the fundamental catalysts in bringing down the USSR. This paper suggests that the attractiveness of Gorbachev’s glasnost policy to 1980s Chinese Sovietologists was not because it symbolised Western-style democracy; instead, they embraced glasnost as a type of government-led democracy. The impact of Gorbachev’s policies after the mid-1980s can also be seen in Chinese scholars’ use of them to support the reformist General Secretary Zhao Ziyang in his power struggle against the Party conservatives leading up to the Tiananmen Incident. This paper further posits that Chinese scholars’ scorn for Gorbachev after Tiananmen was not primarily owing to his role in promoting democratisation; rather, it was because of Gorbachev’s soft line approach towards dissent when communism in Europe was on the verge of collapse. By drawing attention to Gorbachev’s soft line approach, Chinese critics justified China’s use of the Tiananmen crackdown and the brutal measures adopted by Deng Xiaoping to preserve socialist rule and social stability.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authority in the Han Dynasty: Focus on the Sanlao
    Local Authority in the Han Dynasty: Focus on the Sanlao Jiandong CHEN 㱩ڎ暒 School of International Studies Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences University of Technology Sydney Australia A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Technology Sydney Sydney, Australia 2018 Certificate of Original Authorship I certify that the work in this thesis has not previously been submitted for a degree nor has it been submitted as part of requirements for a degree except as fully acknowledged within the text. I also certify that the thesis has been written by me. Any help that I have received in my research work and the preparation of the thesis itself has been acknowledged. In addition, I certify that all information sources and literature used are indicated in the thesis. This thesis is the result of a research candidature conducted with another University as part of a collaborative Doctoral degree. Production Note: Signature of Student: Signature removed prior to publication. Date: 30/10/2018 ii Acknowledgements The completion of the thesis would not have been possible without the help and support of many people. Firstly, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Associate Professor Jingqing Yang for his continuous support during my PhD study. Many thanks for providing me with the opportunity to study at the University of Technology Sydney. His patience, motivation and immense knowledge guided me throughout the time of my research. I cannot imagine having a better supervisor and mentor for my PhD study. Besides my supervisor, I would like to thank the rest of my thesis committee: Associate Professor Chongyi Feng and Associate Professor Shirley Chan, for their insightful comments and encouragement; and also for their challenging questions which incited me to widen my research and view things from various perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Zhang Yiwu
    ASIA 2016; 70(3): 921–941 Giorgio Strafella* Postmodernism as a Nationalist Conservatism? The Case of Zhang Yiwu DOI 10.1515/asia-2015-1014 Abstract: The adoption of postmodernist and postcolonial theories by China’s intellectuals dates back to the early 1990s and its history is intertwined with that of two contemporaneous trends in the intellectual sphere, i. e. the rise of con- servatism and an effort to re-define the function of the Humanities in the country. This article examines how these trends merge in the political stance of a key figure in that process, Peking University literary scholar Zhang Yiwu, through a critical discourse analysis of his writings from the early and mid- 1990s. Pointing at his strategic use of postmodernist discourse, it argues that Zhang Yiwu employed a legitimate critique of the concept of modernity and West-centrism to advocate a historical narrative and a definition of cultural criticism that combine Sino-centrism and depoliticisation. The article examines programmatic articles in which the scholar articulated a theory of the end of China’s “modernity”. It also takes into consideration other parallel interventions that shed light on Zhang Yiwu’s political stance towards modern China, globalisation and post-1992 economic reforms, including a discussion between Zhang Yiwu and some of his most prominent detractors. The article finally reflects on the implications of Zhang Yiwu’s writings for the field of Chinese Studies, in particular on the need to look critically and contextually at the adoption of “foreign” theoretical discourse for national political agendas. Keywords: China, intellectuals, postmodernism, Zhang Yiwu, conservatism, nationalism 1 Introduction This article looks at the early history and politics of the appropriation of post- modernist discourse in the Chinese intellectual sphere, thus addressing the plurality of postmodernity via the plurality of postmodernism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Danger of Deconsolidation Roberto Stefan Foa and Yascha Mounk Ronald F
    July 2016, Volume 27, Number 3 $14.00 The Danger of Deconsolidation Roberto Stefan Foa and Yascha Mounk Ronald F. Inglehart The Struggle Over Term Limits in Africa Brett L. Carter Janette Yarwood Filip Reyntjens 25 Years After the USSR: What’s Gone Wrong? Henry E. Hale Suisheng Zhao on Xi Jinping’s Maoist Revival Bojan Bugari¡c & Tom Ginsburg on Postcommunist Courts Clive H. Church & Adrian Vatter on Switzerland Daniel O’Maley on the Internet of Things Delegative Democracy Revisited Santiago Anria Catherine Conaghan Frances Hagopian Lindsay Mayka Juan Pablo Luna Alberto Vergara and Aaron Watanabe Zhao.NEW saved by BK on 1/5/16; 6,145 words, including notes; TXT created from NEW by PJC, 3/18/16; MP edits to TXT by PJC, 4/5/16 (6,615 words). AAS saved by BK on 4/7/16; FIN created from AAS by PJC, 4/25/16 (6,608 words). PGS created by BK on 5/10/16. XI JINPING’S MAOIST REVIVAL Suisheng Zhao Suisheng Zhao is professor at the Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver. He is executive director of the univer- sity’s Center for China-U.S. Cooperation and editor of the Journal of Contemporary China. When Xi Jinping became paramount leader of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 2012, some Chinese intellectuals with liberal lean- ings allowed themselves to hope that he would promote the cause of political reform. The most optimistic among them even thought that he might seek to limit the monopoly on power long claimed by the ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
    [Show full text]
  • Governance and Politics of China
    Copyrighted material – 978–1–137–44527–8 © Tony Saich 2001, 2004, 2011, 2015 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identifi ed as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First edition 2001 Second edition 2004 Third edition 2011 Fourth edition 2015 Published by PALGRAVE Palgrave in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of 4 Crinan Street, London, N1 9XW. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave is a global imprint of the above companies and is represented throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN 978–1–137–44528–5 hardback ISBN 978–1–137–44527–8 paperback This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin.
    [Show full text]
  • China Perspectives, 55 | September - October 2004 the Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century 2
    China Perspectives 55 | september - october 2004 Varia The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century Chen Lichuan Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/417 DOI: 10.4000/chinaperspectives.417 ISSN: 1996-4617 Publisher Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine Printed version Date of publication: 1 October 2004 ISSN: 2070-3449 Electronic reference Chen Lichuan, « The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century », China Perspectives [Online], 55 | september - october 2004, Online since 29 December 2008, connection on 28 October 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/417 ; DOI : 10.4000/ chinaperspectives.417 This text was automatically generated on 28 October 2019. © All rights reserved The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century 1 The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century Chen Lichuan EDITOR'S NOTE Translated from the French original by Nick Oates 1 From the beginning of the 1980s to the middle of the 1990s, three movements took centre stage on the Chinese intellectual scene: radicalism, conservatism and liberalism. This article sets out to retrace the debate between liberalism and neo-leftism by relying exclusively on the polemical texts of the Chinese writers1. How can we present an intellectual debate that is a process of questioning and clarification and that does not arrive at a consensual conclusion? How can we render intelligible the concepts debated in extracts from the original texts? How can we evaluate the impact that this debate has had on a society undergoing a profound transformation? These are just some of the difficulties with which we were confronted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chinese Liberal Camp in Post-June 4Th China
    The Chinese Liberal Camp [/) OJ > been a transition to and consolidation of "power elite capital­ that economic development necessitated further reforms, the in Post-June 4th China ism" (quangui zibenzhuyr), in which the development of the provocative attacks on liberalism by the new left, awareness of cruellest version of capitalism is dominated by the the accelerating pace of globalisation, and the posture of Jiang ~ Communist bureaucracy, leading to phenomenal economic Zemin's leadership in respect to human rights and rule of law, OJ growth on the one hand and endemic corruption, striking as shown by the political report of the Fifteenth Party []_ social inequalities, ecological degeneration, and skilful politi­ Congress and the signing of the "International Covenant on D... cal oppression on the other. This unexpected outcome has Economic, Social and Cultural Rights" and the "International This paper is aa assessment of Chinese liberal intellectuals in the two decades following June 4th. It provides an disheartened many democracy supporters, who worry that Covenant on Civil and Political Rights."'"' analysis of the intellectual development of Chinese liberal intellectuals; their attitudes toward the party-state, China's transition is "trapped" in a "resilient authoritarian­ The core of the emerging liberal camp is a group of middle­ economic reform, and globalisation; their political endeavours; and their contributions to the project of ism" that can be maintained for the foreseeable future. (3) age scholars who can be largely identified as members of the constitutional democracy in China. However, because it has produced unmanageably acute "Cultural Revolution Generation," including Zhu Xueqin, social tensions and new social and political forces that chal­ Xu Youyu, Qin Hui, He Weifang, Liu junning, Zhang lenge the one-party dictatorship, Market-Leninism is not actu­ Boshu, Sun Liping, Zhou Qiren, Wang Dingding and iberals in contemporary China understand liberalism end to the healthy trend of politicalliberalisation inspired by ally that resilient.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistance, Repression, Responsiveness
    RESISTANCE, REPRESSION, RESPONSIVENESS: WORKERS AND THE STATE IN CHINA A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Isaac Manfred Elfstrom January 2017 © 2017 Isaac Manfred Elfstrom RESISTANCE, REPRESSION, RESPONSIVENESS: WORKERS AND THE STATE IN CHINA Isaac Manfred Elfstrom, Ph. D. Cornell University 2017 This dissertation examines the impact of labor unrest under authoritarianism. It uses evidence from China to explore the possibility that autocracies, especially state socialist and post-socialist ones, are uniquely vulnerable to worker resistance and therefore react to it in a dual manner, at once repressive and responsive. Drawing on an original dataset of strikes, protests, and riots by Chinese workers, I find that increases in unrest are correlated with both increases in public security spending (repression) and pro-labor rulings in formally adjudicated employment disputes (responsiveness). Using a “most similar” case comparison informed by field theory, I then show how in Jiangsu’s portion of the Yangtze River Delta, moderate industrial contention is paired with governance that can be characterized as preemption, caution, and nudging, while in Guangdong’s portion of the Pearl River Delta, high contention is paired with reaction, experimentation, and crackdowns. Thus, consistent with the dissertation’s quantitative analysis, repression and responsiveness are stronger where resistance is more widespread, but governance is also qualitatively different. I argue that, at the level of local governments and local officials, there is a logic to this divergence between the cases: militant workers make a liability of the state’s commitment to stability, thereby threatening the careers of officials, who must, as a consequence, demonstrate grit and creativity.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese People's Perceptions of and Preparedness for Democracy
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2013 Chinese People's Perceptions of and Preparedness for Democracy Xiangyun Lan Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Lan, Xiangyun, "Chinese People's Perceptions of and Preparedness for Democracy" (2013). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 2030. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/2030 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHINESE PEOPLE'S PERCEPTIONS OF AND PREPAREDNESS FOR DEMOCRACY by Xiangyun Lan A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER of SCIENCE In Sociology Approved: Peggy Petrzelka Douglas Jackson-Smith Maj or Professor Committee Member Amy K. Bailey Mark R. McLellan Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 20]3 ii Copyright © Xiangyun Lan 2013 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Chinese People's Perceptions of and Preparedness for Democracy by Xiangyun Lan, Master of Science Utah State University, 2013 Major Professor: Dr. Peggy Petrzelka Department: Sociology, Social Work and Anthropology Democratization in China history has always involved exploration and debates on the concept of democracy. This is an ongoing course, continuing currently in China. This - - - thesis seeks to understand Chinese people' s perceptions of democracy and their considerations of the strategies to democratize modem China.l do.so through analyzing a recent widespread internet debate on democracy and democratization stimulated by Han's Three Essays, three blog essays posted by Han Han, an influential public intellectual in China.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Textadobe
    JapanFocus http://japanfocus.org/articles/print_article/3285 Charter 08, the Troubled History and Future of Chinese Liberalism Feng Chongyi The publication of Charter 08 in China at the end of 2008 was a major event generating headlines all over the world. It was widely recognized as the Chinese human rights manifesto and a landmark document in China’s quest for democracy. However, if Charter 08 was a clarion call for the new march to democracy in China, its political impact has been disappointing. Its primary drafter Liu Xiaobo, after being kept in police custody over one year, was sentenced on Christmas Day of 2009 to 11 years in prison for the “the crime of inciting subversion of state power”, nor has the Chinese communist party-state taken a single step toward democratisation or improving human rights during the year.1 This article offers a preliminary assessment of Charter 08, with special attention to its connection with liberal forces in China. Liu Xiaobo The Origins of Charter 08 and the Crystallisation of Liberal and Democratic Ideas in China Charter 08 was not a bolt from the blue but the result of careful deliberation and theoretical debate, especially the discourse on liberalism since the late 1990s. In its timing, Charter 08 anticipated that major political change would take place in China in 2009 in light of a number of important anniversaries. These included the 20th anniversary of the June 4th crackdown, the 50th anniversary of the exile of the Dalai Lama, the 60th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China, and the 90th anniversary of the May 4th Movement.
    [Show full text]