DOCSLIB.ORG

TOURIST TAX Milan, Like Many Other Cities in Italy and Throughout The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TOURIST TAX Milan, Like Many Other Cities in Italy and Throughout The TOURIST TAX Milan, like many other cities in Italy and throughout the world, has established a Tourist Tax for tourists and visitors. The amount ranges from €. 2,00 to €. 5,00 per night, according to the type, class and number of stars of the establishment. The establishment must issue a separate receipt, or indicate the amount paid for the Tourist Tax within the invoice. The staff are bound to provide all necessary information on exemptions from payment of the tax. Revenues from the Tourist Tax will finance actions for the preservation of the city’s artistic heritage and for the improvement of services for all tourists. The Milan City Council Rif.: D.C.C. del 11/6/12 n. 19; D.C.C. del 26/11/2012 n. 56; D.C.C. del 5/5/2014 n. 13; D.C.C. del 11/3/2019 n. 3 EXEMPTIONS The following are exempt from payment of the tax: 1. Under 18-year-olds 2. Under 30-year-olds staying at public or private non-profit youth hostels with social, educational and cultural ends 3. Helpers of patients hospitalized in the Milan area 4. Patients continuing medical treatment in the Milan area after hospitalization 5. Visitors staying on after the 15th day of permanence in: Residences “Holiday Homes” run by non- profit organizations Houses and apartments for holidays (from June the 14th, 2014) 6. Armed Forces and Police Personnel in Milan on duty 7. Under 26-year-old university students staying at University Residences 8. The disabled and their helpers 9. In case of natural disasters or major events identified by the Administration: Environmental Service local regional and national volunteers Volunteer Associations personnel Rif.: D.C.C. del 11/6/12 n. 19; D.C.C. del 26/11/2012 n. 56; D.C.C. del 5/5/2014 n. 13; D.C.C. del 11/3/2019 n. 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Roman Large-Scale Mapping in the Early Empire
    13 · Roman Large-Scale Mapping in the Early Empire o. A. w. DILKE We have already emphasized that in the period of the A further stimulus to large-scale surveying and map­ early empire1 the Greek contribution to the theory and ping practice in the early empire was given by the land practice of small-scale mapping, culminating in the work reforms undertaken by the Flavians. In particular, a new of Ptolemy, largely overshadowed that of Rome. A dif­ outlook both on administration and on cartography ferent view must be taken of the history of large-scale came with the accession of Vespasian (T. Flavius Ves­ mapping. Here we can trace an analogous culmination pasianus, emperor A.D. 69-79). Born in the hilly country of the Roman bent for practical cartography. The foun­ north of Reate (Rieti), a man of varied and successful dations for a land surveying profession, as already noted, military experience, including the conquest of southern had been laid in the reign of Augustus. Its expansion Britain, he overcame his rivals in the fierce civil wars of had been occasioned by the vast program of colonization A.D. 69. The treasury had been depleted under Nero, carried out by the triumvirs and then by Augustus him­ and Vespasian was anxious to build up its assets. Fron­ self after the civil wars. Hyginus Gromaticus, author of tinus, who was a prominent senator throughout the Fla­ a surveying treatise in the Corpus Agrimensorum, tells vian period (A.D. 69-96), stresses the enrichment of the us that Augustus ordered that the coordinates of surveys treasury by selling to colonies lands known as subseciva.
    [Show full text]
  • Barking Riverside, London First Options Testing of Options: Sketch (Neighborhood Scale)
    CLIMATE-RESILIENT URBAN PLANS AND DESIGNS QUEZON CITY Tools for Design Development I - Urban Design as a Tool Planning Instruments •Philippine Development Plan / Regional Development Plan Comprehensive Plans, NEDA – National Economic and Development Authority •The Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) ~1:40 000 - 1: 20 000 strategic planning approach, specific proposals for guiding, regulating growth and development; considers all sectors significant in the development process consistent with and supportive of provincial plan provides guidelines for city/municipality, including •Zoning Ordinances (implementing tool of the CLUP) divides a territory into zones (residential, commercial, industrial, open space, etc) and specifies the nature and intensity of use of each zone. It is required to be updated every 5 years. •Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) Medium-term plan of action implementing the CLUP (3-6 years), covers the social, economic, infrastructure, environment and institutional sectors •Barangay Development Plan (BDP) socio-economic and physical plan of the barangay; includes priority programmes, projects and activities of the barangay development council enumerates specific programmes and projects and their costs; justifies the use of the Barangay’s share of the Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA) coming from the national government. Usually a list of projects. Urban Design “CityLife Masterplan” - Milano II - The Design Brief as Tool for Resilient Urban Design Instruments per Scale, New ZealandMetropolitan City-wide (urban area) Urban District PrivateNeighborhood Space Street Purpose of the Design Brief 1. The Task specifies what a project has to achieve, by what means, in what timeframe so the design team works towards the right direction (e.g. environmental targets, programme, demands for m²) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • San Casciano Val Di Pesa, Province of Florence, Italy
    Title of the experience : Community Mobility Network (Muoversi in Comune) Name of city/region : San Casciano Val di Pesa, Province of Florence, Italy Promoting entity: Promoted by the Municipality of San Casciano Val di Pesa (Italy) with the Support of the Regional Authority for Participation of the Region of Tuscany. Country: Italy Starting date: 03/2015 Finishing date : 07/2015 Name of the contact person: Leonardo Baldini Position of the contact person: Responsabile del servizio Cultura e Sport – Municipality of San Casciano Val di Pesa Contact telephone: E-mail: [email protected] +39 055 8256260 Population size: 17 201 (01-01-2015) Surface area: 107,83 km² Population Density: 159,52 ab./km² Collaborative service design in smart X Type of experience mobility Regional scope District X Thematic area Transportation X Accessibility, in the sense of the concrete and effective possibility of accessing the workplace, social services, health centers, educational spaces, but also cultural and recreational facilities is a fundamental component in the fight against social exclusion and a discriminating factor in the promotion of social well-being and quality of life. In this context, public and private transports can present high barriers to entry: timetables, routes and costs may preclude their use, especially among the most vulnerable and less autonomous sectors of the population. The City Council of San Casciano Val di Pesa (Italy) suffering in recent years from repeated cuts at the central and regional level to the financial resources needed to provide adequate public transportation, decided to share with its citizens not only the investment choices in new services but also to actively involve the local community and key stakeholders in the participatory design of an innovative integrated mobility network.
    [Show full text]
  • Provincia Codice Istat Della Provincia Codice Istat Del Comune
    Rilevazione statistica "rapida" dei permessi di costruire Elenco dei Comuni campione (anno 2020) - Cod. PSN IST-1675 Codice Istat della Codice Istat del Provincia Denominazione del Comune Provincia Comune 001 006 Almese 001 007 Alpette 001 018 Baldissero Torinese 001 024 Beinasco 001 047 Caluso 001 063 Caselle Torinese 001 071 Cercenasco 001 077 Chiaverano 001 078 Chieri 001 090 Collegno 001 097 Cumiana 001 099 Druento 001 115 Giaveno 001 127 La Loggia 001 130 Leini 001 144 Marentino 001 156 Moncalieri 001 168 None 001 180 Pavarolo Torino 001 181 Pavone Canavese 001 191 Pinerolo 001 194 Piossasco 001 214 Rivalta di Torino 001 218 Rivarossa 001 224 Ronco Canavese 001 248 San Maurizio Canavese 001 249 San Mauro Torinese 001 254 San Secondo di Pinerolo 001 255 Sant'Ambrogio di Torino 001 260 Scalenghe 001 272 Torino 001 276 Trana 001 292 Venaria Reale 001 302 Villarbasse 001 309 Vinovo 001 310 Virle Piemonte 001 314 Volpiano 001 318 Valchiusa 002 008 Balmuccia 002 061 Gattinara Vercelli 002 156 Varallo 002 158 Vercelli 002 170 Alto Sermenza 003 016 Bellinzago Novarese 003 024 Borgomanero 003 070 Gargallo 003 079 Grignasco Novara 003 097 Mezzomerico 003 106 Novara 003 130 Romagnano Sesia 003 138 Sillavengo 003 149 Trecate 004 019 Bene Vagienna 004 025 Borgo San Dalmazzo 004 044 Cartignano 004 078 Cuneo 004 082 Dronero 004 089 Fossano 004 101 Guarene 004 117 Marene 004 143 Moretta Cuneo 004 163 Peveragno 004 165 Pianfei 004 169 Piozzo 004 198 Ruffia 004 215 Savigliano 004 224 Stroppo 004 227 Torre Mondovì 004 239 Vernante 004 244 Villafalletto Rilevazione statistica "rapida" dei permessi di costruire Elenco dei Comuni campione (anno 2020) - Cod.
    [Show full text]
  • Codici Statistici Delle Unità Amministrative Territoriali
    30 giugno 2021 Codici statistici delle unità amministrative territoriali NOVITÀ PER L'ANNO 2021 1. Numero dei comuni 17 giugno 2021 Modifica confini regionali Con Legge n. 84/2021 è disposta la modifica dei confini delle Marche e dell’Emilia-Romagna a seguito del passaggio dei comuni di Montecopiolo e Sassofeltrio dalla Provincia di Pesaro e Urbino a quella di Rimini. 20 febbraio 2021 I comuni sono 7.904. Istituito il comune di Misiliscemi (TP) mediante scorporo dal comune di Trapani delle località Fontanasalsa, Guarrato, Rilievo, Locogrande, Marausa, Palma, Salinagrande e Pietretagliate. 2. Cambi denominazione Non si registrano variazioni fino alla data di riferimento del documento. 3. Le tipologie di ripartizioni sovracomunali Negli ultimi anni l’assetto amministrativo nazionale ha subìto numerosi cambiamenti, non solo in termini di numerosità di comuni, ma anche di organizzazione dei livelli gerarchici superiori (Province, Città metropolitane e Liberi consorzi di comuni). Cambiamenti che si ripercuotono sul tema delle unità territoriali da utilizzare, sia per la produzione di statistiche, sia come dimensione per la diffusione dell’informazione al livello territoriale intermedio tra Regione e Comune. Pertanto, a fronte dei cambiamenti amministrativi intervenuti, l’Istat introduce, il termine di Unità territoriale sovracomunale ad indicare le diverse tipologie di enti intermedi di secondo livello (Province, Città metropolitane e Liberi consorzi di comuni) in conseguenza delle leggi di riforma degli assetti territoriali. Restano invariati i loro codici statistici. L’Istat chiarisce, inoltre, che il termine di Unità territoriale sovracomunale ricomprende anche le “unità non amministrative”, ossia le ex-province di Trieste, Gorizia, Pordenone e Udine, dopo la soppressione degli Enti locali intermedi nella regione Friuli-Venezia Giulia.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews Section
    Island Studies Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2006, pp. 163-180 BOOK REVIEWS SECTION Albury, Paul (2004) The Paradise Island Story, 2nd edition, revised by Anne and Jim Lawlor, Oxford, Macmillan Caribbean, 136pp. (illus), $19.90 (hardcover). ISBN: 0333992571. The Story of Paradise Island is an innocent book. It wants to be a straightforward anecdotal narrative about the apotheosis of “Hog Island,” which forms a harbour for the Bahamian capital of Nassau, into “Paradise Island,” a wave-lapped Garden of Eden for heat-seeking tourists who like their creature comforts dosed with novelty. At one level, this slender book is just that. There is a sort of antiquarian frontispiece, full of pirates, privateers, and adventurers, before the arc of the narrative reaches the tourism era. There, after a few false starts and thwarted dreams, entrepreneurship and free enterprise triumph in the person of South African hotelier Sol Kerzner, “a man of single-minded vision” (a popular descriptor in the world of business, which, when it takes notice of the past at all, remains wedded to a “great men” version of it). At last count, Kerzner and his associates had invested something in the order of $1 billion in tourist accommodations, attractions, and infrastructure on the 850-acre island, turning it into one of the premiere tourist destinations in the Caribbean. What we have in this book, writes J. Barrie Farrington in a florid foreword, is not a critical examination of anything, really; rather it “is a journey of magical proportions through time and a series of financial adventures and escapades” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Cities Resilient: Summary for Policymakers
    Making Cities Resilient: Summary for Policymakers A global snapshot of how local governments reduce disaster risk – April 2013 Photo cover: Alessandro Zanchini, Comune di Venezia. The City of Venice joined the Campaign as a Role Model for cultural heritage protection and climate change adaptation. Venice has developed a plan with both structural and bio-geomorphological management components, including coastal reinforcement, wetland reconstruction, reclamation of polluted sites, a system of mobile sea barriers, city pavement elevation, urban maintenance, flood monitoring, early warning and public awareness. Saint Mark’s Basilica: living with floods and tourists... Foreword “Building resilience is a forward looking, target driven approach to urban development that uses a wide range of measures addressing all elements of urban systems. Ensuring these targets are met demands all levels of communities and governments work together to ensure the safety of all people and protect the economic, social, environmental, and cultural assets and attributes which define the unique character of each city. As global leaders we must integrate disaster risk reduction criteria as a measure of progress for sustainable development plans and strategies. We must also strengthen local level capacity by reflecting the needs of local governments in international frameworks and promoting standards of resilience that can guide urban development and planning along a sustainable path.” Margareta Wahlström Special Representative of the Secretary General for Disaster Risk Reduction, UNISDR Dr. Joan Clos Under-Secretary General and Executive Director, UN-Habitat Making Cities Resilient Report 2013 Disclaimer The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Secretariat and are those of the authors and references cited.
    [Show full text]
  • To Apply the PHI to the Metropolitan Areas It Was Deemed Important to Identify the Adequated Administrative Level to Provide Evidence on Urban Inequalities
    Supplementary Material S1: Additional information on the Local Administrative Unit and delimitation of each metropolitan area. To apply the PHI to the metropolitan areas it was deemed important to identify the adequated administrative level to provide evidence on urban inequalities. For this study the definition of a municipality from the Encyclopædia Britannica was applied (http://www.britannica.com/topic/municipality): «A municipality is a political subdivision of a state within which a municipal corporation has been established to provide general local government for a specific population concentration in a defined area (…). The municipality is one of several basic types of local government, the others being counties, townships, school districts, and special districts».). However, European countries have a diversified system of local government in which several different categories exist. For instance, the term municipality may be applied in France to the commune, in Italy to comune and in Portugal to município. EUROSTAT has set up a hierarchical system of Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS) and Local Administrative Units (LAUs). NUTS are organized into four levels. NUTS 0 correspond to the 28 EU countries. NUTS 1 are the major socio-economic regions within a given country. NUTS 2 are basic regions for the application of regional policies and NUTS 3 are small regions for specific diagnoses. Below, the Local Administrative Units are also organized into two hierarchical levels: The upper LAU level (LAU level 1) and the lower LAU level (LAU level 2). For most European countries, LAU-2 corresponds to municipalities, except for Bulgaria and Hungary (Settlements), Ireland (Districts), Lithuania (Elderships), Malta (Councils), Denmark (Municipalities), Greece (Municipalities), Portugal (Parishes), and the United Kingdom (Wards) [47] (Table S1).
    [Show full text]
  • Looking at Metropolitan Areas As Laboratories of Metropolitan Governance
    Looking at metropolitan areas as Laboratories of metropolitan governance Viviana Rubbo Metrex Bernd Steinacher Fellowship 2016-2018 1 This research is the results of conversations, meetings and talks which took place in several occasions and places in Europe, starting from the METREX conferences in Stockholm (June 2017), Helsinki (Oct 2017) and San Sebastian (June 2018) but also during interviews (in Rome, Naples, Bologna), skype and conference calls (Lyon, Prague, Milan). Therefore I am very grateful to all the people who have devoted their time and shared their thoughts on the present challenges faced by their governments in this particular moment of metropolitan transition. A heartfelt thanks for the precious contribution to: Hannu Pettila (Vantaa), Elettra Malossi (Regione Emilia-Romagna), Silvia Grassi (Regione Emilia-Romagna), Alessandro Delpiano (Città metropolitana di Bologna), Claudio Tolomelli (previously at the Regione Emilia-Ro- magna, currently retired), Francesco Tentoni (Città metropolitana di Bologna), Giacomo Ariete (Città metropolitana di Napoli), Valeria Vanella (Città metropolitana di Napoli), Maria Vottari (Città metropolitana di Napoli), Massimo del Vasto (Città metropolitana di Napoli), Bartolo Cassaglia (Comune di Napoli), Franco Sacchi (Centro ricerche PIM), Elena Corsi (Centro ricerche PIM), Pietro Rubellini (former Director at the Città metropolitana di Firenze and currently Executive Director at the Comune di Firenze), Nadia Bellomo (Città metropolitana di Firenze), Deborah Galimberti (Science PO Lyon), Véronique
    [Show full text]
  • Birth Town Bias in Transfers to Italian Municipalities
    SENDING THE PORK HOME: BIRTH TOWN BIAS IN TRANSFERS TO ITALIAN MUNICIPALITIES Felipe Carozzi and Luca Repetto CEMFI Working Paper No. 1401 March 2014 CEMFI Casado del Alisal 5; 28014 Madrid Tel. (34) 914 290 551 Fax (34) 914 291 056 Internet: www.cemfi.es We would like to thank Stéphane Bonhomme, Alessandra Casella, Eshien Chong, Torun Dewan, Jon Fiva, Stefano Gagliarducci, Mónica Martínez-Bravo, Claudio Michelacci, Massimo Morelli and Diego Puga for useful comments and suggestions. We also thank seminar participants at CEMFI, Harvard Government, LSE SERC and LSE Government, together with participants at the 2013 EPCS meeting and the V Workshop on Fiscal Decentralization at IEB for valuable comments and remarks. We thank the Italian Ministry of Internal Affairs and Stefano Gagliarducci for data on candidates. Funding from the European Commission's Seventh Research Framework Programme through the European Research Council's Advanced Grant “Spatial Spikes” (contract number 269868) and financial support from the AXA PhD scholarship are gratefully acknowledged by the first and second author, respectively. CEMFI Working Paper 1401 March 2014 SENDING THE PORK HOME: BIRTH TOWN BIAS IN TRANSFERS TO ITALIAN MUNICIPALITIES Abstract We ask whether the birthplaces of Italian members of Parliament are favoured in the allocation of central government transfers. Using a panel of municipalities for the years between 1994 and 2006, we find that municipal governments of legislators' birth towns receive larger transfers per capita. Exploiting the fact that some birth towns are outside of the district of election, we conclude that this result cannot be driven by re-election incentives. On the contrary, we show that these incentives discourage legislators from diverting resources to their birthplace.
    [Show full text]
  • Call4 Applicant Seminar Munich Presentation PDF
    Urban Innovative Actions Applicants Seminar 4th Call for Proposals @UIA_initiative Munich, 21 November 2018 Introduction to the UIA Initiative .2 Who is in the room? Are you a representative of an urban authority (association of urban authorities, regional/national authority, EU institution)? Have you already heard about UIA? Has the institution you represent applied in the framework of the previous Call for Proposals? Is the institution you represent preparing a proposal for the currently open UIA Call for Proposals? Which topic are you interested in? .3 Individual consultations Table 2: Urban Poverty / Table 4: Sustainable use of Table 5: Sustainable use of Time Table 1: Digital Transition Urban Security land land City of Cosenza (IT) City of Karlsruhe (DE) Varna Municipality (BG) Berlin (DE) 15:30 - 15:55 Anna Bruno & Tiziana Frederike Gross & Julia Kristiana Kazandzhieva & Petya Joerg Rock Cuomo & Stefano Zizzi Hackenbruch Ishkieva City of Taranto (IT) City of Graz (AT) Stadt Landshut (DE) City di Siena (IT) 16:00 - 16:25 Laura D'Antonio & Matteo di Christian Nussmueller Claudia Obermaier Iuri Bruni & Stefania Elisei Venosa Comune di Lucca (IT) City of Munich (DE) 16:30 - 16:55 Valentina Mercanti & Luca Sylvia Pintarits Galli Stuttgart (DE) 17:00 - 17:25 Markus Guth & Bertil Kilian Main objectives Art.8 ERDF: “…To identify and test new solutions which address issues related to sustainable urban development and are of relevance at Union level.” To provide urban authorities with resources to test how new and unproven solutions work in practice and how they respond to the complexity of real life To draw lessons and share knowledge with other urban authorities across Europe .5 Key figures & funding principles UIA budget: EUR 372 Mio ERDF ERDF per project: max.
    [Show full text]
  • Risultati Elettorali Amministrative 2011
    2011 - N°3 RISULTATI ELETTORALI DELLE AMMINISTRATIVE 2011 © IVICA C RISULTATI AMMINISTRATIVE 2011 N° 3 - 2011 CIVICA A cura di Daniele Comero con il contributo di Pietro Marino CIVICA N°3 Anno 2011 Pubblicazione periodica della Provincia di Milano Direttore responsabile: dott. Daniele Comero Redazione: dott. Pietro Marino Registrazione al Tribunale di Milano: n.125, 7 marzo 2001 Via Vivaio, 1 20122 Milano Telefono 02.7740.2448 Fax 02.7740.2437 e-mail: [email protected] 19 luglio 2011 - 2 - N° 3 - 2011 CIVICA Indice Parte I I risultati nei 19 comuni della provincia di Milano Tavole riepilogative dei Comuni al voto con sistema proporzionale e con sistema maggioritario, mappa dei comuni al voto in provincia di Milano, tabelle riepilogative del voto (1° e 2° turno) e della partecipazione, interno delle schede elettorali dei due turni. pag. 5 Tabelle riepilogative del voto e della partecipazione in ciascuno dei Comuni al voto con sistema maggioritario e l’interno delle schede elettorali. pag. 19 Tavole sinottiche: candidati liste e risultati dei Comuni con sistema proporzionale e di quelli con sistema maggioritario. pag. 33 Parte II Le elezioni comunali e di zona 2011 nella città di Milano Tavola riepilogativa dei risultati del 1° turno e del Ballottaggio al Comune di Milano, la partecipazione al voto, l’interno delle schede del 1° e del 2° turno e le preferenze raccolte da ciascuna lista di candidati al consiglio comunale. pag. 38 I risultati delle elezioni circoscrizionali per ciascuna delle 9 zone, l’interno delle schede di voto, riepilogativo dei risultati per zona e le preferenze raccolte dalle liste di candidati ai consigli di zona.
    [Show full text]