DOCSLIB.ORG

The Beaker Phenomenon? Understanding the Character and Context of Social Practices in Ireland 2500-2000 BC

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Provided by the author(s) and University College Dublin Library in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Title The Beaker Phenomenon? Understanding the character and context of social practices in Ireland 2500-2000 BC Authors(s) Carlin, Neil Publication date 2018-10-22 Publisher Sidestone Press Link to online version https://www.sidestone.com/books/the-beaker-phenomenon Item record/more information http://hdl.handle.net/10197/10157 Downloaded 2021-10-04T00:15:53Z The UCD community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters! (@ucd_oa) © Some rights reserved. For more information, please see the item record link above. CARLIN CARLIN THE BEAKER PHENOMENON? PHENOMENON? BEAKER THE During the mid-third millennium BC, people across Europe started using an international suite of novel material culture including early metalwork and distinctive ceramics known as Beakers. The nature and social significance of this phenomenon, as well as the reasons for its rapid and widespread transmission have been much debated. The adoption of these new ideas and objects in Ireland, Europe’s westernmost island, provides a highly suitable case study in which to investigate these issues. While many Beaker-related stone and metal artefacts were previously known from Ireland, a decade of intensive developer- led excavations (1997-2007) resulted in an exponential increase in discoveries of Beaker pottery within apparent settlement contexts across the island. This scenario is radically different from Europe where these objects are found with Beakers in funerary settings, stereotypically with single burials. Using an innovative approach, this book interlinks the study of the pottery and various object types (that have traditionally been studied in isolation) with their context of discovery and depositional treatment to characterise social practices within settlements, funerary monuments, ceremonial settings and natural places. These characterisations deliver rich new understandings of this period which reveal a much more nuanced narrative for this international phenomenon. Significantly, this integrated regional study reveals that the various Beaker- related objects found in Ireland were all deposited during a series of highly structured and rule-bound activities which were strongly influenced by pre- existing Irish traditions. This is a departure from previous interpretations which incorrectly attributed the adoption of Beakers to large-scale immigration or a prestige goods economy. Instead, these new international ideas, objects and practices played an important role in enabling people in Ireland to perform and THE BEAKER negotiate their personal and group identities by using this new suite of object to frame and maintain their social relations with other groups across Europe. PHENOMENON? Understanding the character and context of social practices in Ireland 2500-2000 BC ISBNSidestone 978-90-8890-449-3 Press Sidestone ISBN: 978-90-8890-463-9 NEIL CARLIN 9 789088 904493 10cm THE BEAKER PHENOMENON? Sidestone Press THE BEAKER PHENOMENON? Understanding the character and context of social practices in Ireland 2500-2000 BC NEIL CARLIN © 2018 Neil Carlin Published by Sidestone Press, Leiden www.sidestone.com Imprint: Sidestone Press Dissertations Lay-out & cover design: Sidestone Press Photograph cover: Old Head of Kinsale, foto: Robert Fudali via Adobe Stock. Pottery drawings by Eoin Grogan. ISBN 978-90-8890-463-9 (softcover) ISBN 978-90-8890-464-6 (hardcover) ISBN 978-90-8890-465-3 (PDF e-book) This publication was financially supported by the University College Dublin School of Archaeology. Contents Acknowledgements 9 Preface 11 1. Introduction: querying the Beaker Phenomenon? 13 1.1 Understanding the Beaker complex? 13 1.2 ‘Similar but different’? 15 1.3 Local worlds: people, places and things 16 1.4 Structure, scope and methodology: a road map 17 2. New versions of old stories 21 2.1 Introduction 21 2.2 Beaker ‘culture’ and cultural-historical approaches 22 2.3 Early 1900s: Beaker-free Ireland says No to Romans 23 2.4 The 1930s: the first Irish Beaker boom 24 2.5 The 1940s and 50s: the arrival of Beaker invaders 25 2.6 The 1960s and 70s: new beginnings 27 2.7 The 1980s and 1990s: Irish Beaker elites – the ‘Lunula lords’ 28 2.8 The 2000s: Beaker excavation boom – data vs knowledge 29 2.9 Shifting chronologies: the legacy of Lough Gur and 31 Newgrange 2.10 Fragmentary pasts: non-integrated typologies 33 2.11 Problematising prestige and recent developments 34 2.12 Post-colonial Beaker-rich Ireland 36 3. A settled past 39 3.1 Beaker pottery in Ireland 39 3.1.1 The distribution of Beaker pottery 40 3.1.2 A context for Beakers 45 3.2 Infamous Beaker ‘settlements’ 47 3.2.1 Lough Gur 47 3.2.2 Newgrange 49 3.2.3 Knowth 51 3.2.4 Monknewtown 53 3.3 Settling some issues? 55 3.4 Dwelling on the evidence? 60 4. Remembering everyday life 65 4.1 Introduction 65 4.2 Beaker-associated pits 65 4.3 Spreads and middens 80 4.4 Fulachtaí fia 87 4.5 Connecting spreads and pits 89 4.6 Ideologically significant depositions 91 4.7 Beaker settlement in Ireland in its wider context 92 5. Fragments of the Dead? 95 5.1 Introduction 95 5.2 Beaker deposition in wedge tombs 96 5.3 Beaker deposition in court tombs 107 5.4 Beaker deposition in passage tombs 110 5.5 Beaker deposition in portal tombs 112 5.6 Beaker deposition in cists 113 5.7 Beaker deposition in ring-ditches and ring-barrows 120 5.8 Beaker deposition in pit graves 120 5.9 Understanding deposition in mortuary and megalithic 122 contexts 5.10 Wedge tombs and cists as Beaker burials? 124 5.11 A wider European context? 129 6. Commemorations of Ceremonies Past? 135 6.1 Introduction 135 6.2 Beaker deposition in timber circles 137 6.3 Beaker deposition at timber circles 147 6.4 Beaker deposition in earthen enclosures 148 6.5 Understanding Beaker ceremonial deposition 150 7. Transformational acts in transitional spaces 153 7.1 Introduction 153 7.2 Beaker-related objects in bogs, rivers and lakes 154 7.3 Beaker-related objects in dryland ‘natural places’ 156 7.4 Identifying depositional patterns and practices 157 7.5 Beaker-related objects in ‘natural places’ in Europe? 158 7.6 Understanding deposition in boglands in Ireland 159 8. A time for Beakers? 161 8.1 Introduction 161 8.2 Methodology and date selection criteria 161 8.3 The dating of the Irish Beaker phenomenon 164 8.4 Dating depositional practices 169 8.5 Comparing Ireland to Britain? 170 9. Everything in its right place? 173 9.1 Introduction 173 9.2 Beaker Pottery 173 9.3 Polypod bowls 177 9.4 V-perforated buttons 179 9.5 Wrist-bracers 181 9.6 Copper Daggers 185 9.7 Sun-discs 186 9.8 Lunulae 189 9.9 Gold bands and basket-ornaments 191 9.10 Battle Axes 192 9.11 Identifying depositional patterns and practices 193 10. The Beaker phenomenon in Ireland and Beyond? 197 10.1 The genomic transformation of north-west Europe? 198 10.2 External influences? 200 10.3 Continuity and change? 202 10.4 Beaker pots: commemorating the domestic 206 10.5 The meanings of Beaker-related objects? 207 10.6 Personhood and ‘personal possessions’ 208 10.7 Transformation rituals 208 10.8 Supra-regional cosmologies? 209 10.9 Rites of passage in sacred places? 212 10.10 The Beaker transformation? 213 10.11 The Beaker Phenomenon? 215 Bibliography 217 Acknowledgements This book would not exist in its current form without the support, encouragement and input of Karen Dempsey, my partner in life and of course, archaeology. Much of what is expressed here comes from our discussions and shared passions, as well as her con- structive feedback on ever-changing draft chapters. Thanks to Kerri Cleary who read, commented on and copy edited the manuscript. Her observations have greatly clarified and enhanced the text, though the faults it still has are entirely mine. Alex Guglielmi assisted greatly with the bibliography. Thanks also to Karsten Wentink and Corné van Woerdekom of Sidestone Press for all their patience and help. The research for this book was originally undertaken as a doctoral study in the University College Dublin, School of Archaeology and the Humanities Institute of Ireland, with the support of a UCD Ad Astra scholarship under the supervision of Jo Brück. I am grateful to Jo and the examiners of my PhD thesis, Harry Fokkens and Gabriel Cooney, whose astute critique and probing questions provided the basis for this book. I am pleased to acknowledge the support of my friends and colleagues in the School of Archaeology at University College Dublin, particularly Gabriel Cooney and Graeme Warren for their interest, encouragement and support and Conor McDermott for his help with creating and editing many of the illustrations in this book. I would also like to formally acknowledge my gratitude to the School of Archaeology for their financial con- tribution. During a break from teaching in UCD, this book was completed in Reading, where Karen is currently a Research Fellow. Thanks to all those in the Department of Archaeology at the University of Reading who made me feel so welcome while I was there, particularly Duncan Garrow. I wish to thank Jim Mallory for originally encouraging my interest in the Beaker phenomenon. I am also grateful to all my colleagues whom have shared and discussed their work with me, particularly Mary Cahill, Neil Wilkin, Alison Sheridan, and Stuart Needham. Thanks to Tom Booth for so generously sharing his time and knowledge with me. Our discussions have considerably improved my understanding of aDNA. My sincerest thanks to the community of archaeologists, consultancies, directors, and other heritage professionals who kindly contributed their time and shared the results of their investigations with me over the 15 years.
Recommended publications
  • The University of Bradford Institutional Repository

    The University of Bradford Institutional Repository

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bradford Scholars The University of Bradford Institutional Repository http://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk This work is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please refer to the repository record for this item and our Policy Document available from the repository home page for further information. To see the final version of this work please visit the publisher’s website. Where available access to the published online version may require a subscription. Author(s): Gibson, Alex M. Title: An Introduction to the Study of Henges: Time for a Change? Publication year: 2012 Book title: Enclosing the Neolithic : Recent studies in Britain and Ireland. Report No: BAR International Series 2440. Publisher: Archaeopress. Link to publisher’s site: http://www.archaeopress.com/archaeopressshop/public/defaultAll.asp?QuickSear ch=2440 Citation: Gibson, A. (2012). An Introduction to the Study of Henges: Time for a Change? In: Gibson, A. (ed.). Enclosing the Neolithic: Recent studies in Britain and Europe. Oxford: Archaeopress. BAR International Series 2440, pp. 1-20. Copyright statement: © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2012. An Introduction to the Study of Henges: Time for a Change? Alex Gibson Abstract This paper summarises 80 years of ‘henge’ studies. It considers the range of monuments originally considered henges and how more diverse sites became added to the original list. It examines the diversity of monuments considered to be henges, their origins, their associated monument types and their dates. Since the introduction of the term, archaeologists have often been uncomfortable with it.
  • Concrete Prehistories: the Making of Megalithic Modernism 1901-1939

    Concrete Prehistories: the Making of Megalithic Modernism 1901-1939

    Concrete Prehistories: The Making of Megalithic Modernism Abstract After water, concrete is the most consumed substance on earth. Every year enough cement is produced to manufacture around six billion cubic metres of concrete1. This paper investigates how concrete has been built into the construction of modern prehistories. We present an archaeology of concrete in the prehistoric landscapes of Stonehenge and Avebury, where concrete is a major component of megalithic sites restored between 1901 and 1964. We explore how concreting changed between 1901 and the Second World War, and the implications of this for constructions of prehistory. We discuss the role of concrete in debates surrounding restoration, analyze the semiotics of concrete equivalents for the megaliths, and investigate the significance of concreting to interpretations of prehistoric building. A technology that mixes ancient and modern, concrete helped build the modern archaeological imagination. Concrete is the substance of the modern –”Talking about concrete means talking about modernity” (Forty 2012:14). It is the material most closely associated with the origins and development of modern architecture, but in the modern era, concrete has also been widely deployed in the preservation and display of heritage. In fact its ubiquity means that concrete can justifiably claim to be the single most dominant substance of heritage conservation practice between 1900 and 1945. This paper investigates how concrete has been built into the construction of modern pasts, and in particular, modern prehistories. As the pre-eminent marker of modernity, concrete was used to separate ancient from modern, but efforts to preserve and display prehistoric megaliths saw concrete and megaliths become entangled.
  • Circular Route from Durrington Walls to Stonehenge

    Circular Route from Durrington Walls to Stonehenge

    Circular route from Durrington Walls 3 Stonehenge Cottages, King to Stonehenge Barrows, Amesbury, Wiltshire SP4 7DD This walk explores two major historic monuments, Durrington TRAIL Walls and Stonehenge, in Walking the heart of the Stonehenge World Heritage Site. On this GRADE circular walk you will discover the Moderate landscape in its full glory from the Bronze Age barrows to the First DISTANCE World War military railway track, 5 miles (7.6km) as well as its diverse wildlife and plants. TIME 4 hours Terrain OS MAP Landranger 184; This circular walk follows hard tracks and gently sloping downs. Surfaces can be uneven, with potholes Explorer 130 or long tussocky grass. Dogs welcome on a lead and under control, as sheep and cattle graze the fields and there are ground-nesting birds. Contact Things to see 01980 664780 [email protected] Facilities Durrington Walls The old railway track The Avenue Have a look around you and Stonehenge Landscape has a This impressive bank and ditch http://nationaltrust.org.uk/walks appreciate the nature of this rich military history. The Lark Hill earthwork is more than 1.5 henge as an enclosed valley. Military Light Railway (LMLR) miles (2.5km) long. It may have If you were here over 4,500 line, ran through the landscape been the ceremonial route and years ago you would have seen from Amesbury to Larkhill and on entrance to the stone circle and In partnership with several shrines around the to the Stonehenge aerodrome recent excavations suggest it slopes, and Neolithic houses from 1914 until 1929.
  • Download Date 30/09/2021 08:59:09

    Download Date 30/09/2021 08:59:09

    Reframing the Neolithic Item Type Thesis Authors Spicer, Nigel Christopher Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 30/09/2021 08:59:09 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/13481 University of Bradford eThesis This thesis is hosted in Bradford Scholars – The University of Bradford Open Access repository. Visit the repository for full metadata or to contact the repository team © University of Bradford. This work is licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence. Reframing the Neolithic Nigel Christopher SPICER Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD Department of Archaeological Sciences School of Life Sciences University of Bradford 2013 Nigel Christopher SPICER – Reframing the Neolithic Abstract Keywords: post-processualism, Neolithic, metanarrative, individual, postmodernism, reflexivity, epistemology, Enlightenment, modernity, holistic. In advancing a critical examination of post-processualism, the thesis has – as its central aim – the repositioning of the Neolithic within contemporary archaeological theory. Whilst acknowledging the insights it brings to an understanding of the period, it is argued that the knowledge it produces is necessarily constrained by the emphasis it accords to the cultural. Thus, in terms of the transition, the symbolic reading of agriculture to construct a metanarrative of Mesolithic continuity is challenged through a consideration of the evidential base and the indications it gives for a corresponding movement at the level of the economy; whilst the limiting effects generated by an interpretative reading of its monuments for an understanding of the social are considered.
  • Durrington Walls

    Durrington Walls

    Feeding Stonehenge: cuisine and consumption at the Late Neolithic site of Durrington Walls Oliver E. Craig1, Lisa-Marie Shillito1,2, Umberto Albarella3, Sarah Viner-Daniels3, Ben Chan3,4, Ros CleaP, Robert Ixer6, Mandy Jay7, Pete Marshall8, Ellen Simmons3, Elizabeth Wright3 & Mike Parker Pearson6 The discovery o f Neolithic houses at Durrington Walls that are contemporary with the main construction phase o f Stonehenge raised questions as to their interrelationship. Was Durrington Walls the residence o f the builders o f Stonehenge? Were the activities there more significant than simply domestic subsistence? Using lipid residue analysis, this paper identifies the preferential use of certain pottery types for the preparation o f particular food groups and differential consumption of dairy and meat products between monumental and domestic areas o f the site. Supported by the analysis o f faunal remains, the results suggest seasonal feasting and perhaps organised culinary unification o f a diverse community. Keywords: UK, Stonehenge, Neolithic, feasting, isotopic lipid residue analysis, public and private consumption 1 BioArCh, Department o f Archaeology, University o f York, Heslington, York YO lO 5DD , U K (Email: Oliver. craig@york. ac. uk) 2 School o f History, Classics and Archaeology, Armstrong Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK 2 Department o f Archaeology, University o f Sheffield, Northgate House, West Street, Sheffield S I 4ET, U K 4 Laboratory for Artefact Studies, Faculty o f Archaeology, Leiden
  • Neolithic Resource

    Neolithic Resource

    Neolithic Burial Chambers Education Resource Pack Key Stage 2 Literacy, Numeracy, Music, Art, ICT, PSE, Curriculum Cymreig LEARN Neolithic Burial Chambers Education Resource Neolithic burial chambers in Cadw’s care: Curriculum links: Barclodiad-y-Gawres passage tomb, Anglesey Literacy — oracy, developing & presenting Bodowyr burial chamber, Anglesey information & ideas Bryn Celli Ddu passage tomb, Anglesey Numeracy — measuring and data skills Capel Garmon burial chamber, Conwy Music — composing, performing Carreg Coetan Arthur burial chamber, Pembrokeshire Din Dryfol burial chamber, Anglesey Art — skills & range Duffryn Ardudwy burial chamber, Gwynedd Information Communication Technology — Lligwy burial chamber, Anglesey find and analyse information; create & Parc le Breos chambered tomb, Gower communicate information Pentre Ifan burial chamber, Pembrokeshire Personal Social Education — moral & spiritual Presaddfed burial chamber, Anglesey development St Lythans burial chamber, Vale of Glamorgan Curriculum Cymreig — visiting historical Tinkinswood burial chamber, Vale of Glamorgan sites, using artefacts, making comparisons Trefignath burial chamber, Anglesey between past and present, and developing Ty Newydd burial chamber, Anglesey an understanding of how these have changed over time All the Neolithic burial chambers in Cadw’s care are open sites, and visits do not need to be booked in advance. We would recommend that teachers undertake a planning visit prior to taking groups to a burial chamber, as parking and access are not always straightforward. Young people re-creating their own Neolithic ritual at Tinkinswood chambered tomb, Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales cadw.gov.wales/learning 2 Neolithic Burial Chambers Education Resource The Neolithic period • In west Wales, portal dolmens and cromlechs The Neolithic period is a time when farming was dominate, which have large stone chambers possibly introduced and when people learned how to grow covered by earth or stone mounds.
  • Origins and Prehistory of Wales: Interpretation Plan

    Origins and Prehistory of Wales: Interpretation Plan

    Contents A pan Wales approach to interpreting the prehistoric past Page 1 • Introduction to the Interpretation Plan • Approach to the Plan and its recommendations • Interpretation Plan methodology • Delivering the Interpretation Plan Challenges for interpreting the Origins and Prehistory of Wales Page 5 • Understanding the issues and challenges for interpretation • A simplified chronology • Visual timeline – illustration • Communicating time and key events Audiences for interpretation Page 11 • What we know – current intelligence • The potential • The strategic context • Wales Tourism Strategy • Wales Walking Tourism Strategy • The Wales Spatial Plan • Regional Tourism Strategies • Visit Britain Culture & Heritage Topic Profile • Intelligence for digital audiences and interpretive media • Implications for Origins and Prehistory: target audiences, interpretive media approach Resources (site and collections) and site audits Page 23 • Introduction • Types of sites and monuments • Artefacts • Other resources • Site visits and audits • Emotional auditing • Site response comparisons – emotional audit • Map of sites Developing appealing content and ‘destinations’ Page 29 • Providing context • Strategic approaches to promotion and presentation The Origins and Prehistory of Wales: a strategic approach to interpretation Prepared by Carolyn Lloyd Brown FTS MAHI & David Patrick for Cadw May 2011 Interpretation Framework Page 33 • Interpretive aims • Storyline appeal and interpretive content • A sense of shared ancestry and identity • Interpretive
  • Mackie Article

    Mackie Article

    Page 1 of 24 http://intarch.ac.uk/antiquity/mackie02.html Go OCT JAN FEB Close 10 captures 10 Help 18 Dec 02 - 9 Feb 05 2003 2005 2006 The structure of British Neolithic society a response to Clive Ruggles and Gordon Barclay Euan W. MacKie 1. INTRODUCTION Background Clive Ruggles and Gordon Barclay (2000) clearly are not persuaded, first, by the author’s arguments for the hierarchical structure of late Neolithic society in Britain or, second, by the evidence he has collected for the genuineness of the long celestial alignments postulated by Alexander Thom. Although their ‘reply’ was primarily provoked by his article in this journal on the Orkney chambered tomb Maeshowe (MacKie 1997), the main focus of their attack is broader — his book written a quarter of a century ago (1977). In brief two main arguments were put forward there. The first is that the archaeological evidence for the late Neolithic period could by itself be re- interpreted to give a picture of some kind of hierarchical organisation in which a professional priesthood played a prominent part; sites like Durrington Walls and Woodhenge were — in this new scenario — the obvious residences and training centres of this élite. The second argument was based on the work of Alexander Thom (1967; Thom & Thom 1978) whose discoveries (made mainly from exact measurement) about the geometrical and astronomical qualities of the standing stone sites seemed to provide clear evidence for the intellectual capabilities of the priesthood concerned. To this evidence was added that from several fieldwork tests of Thom’s ideas carried out at standing stone sites by the author.
  • Stonehenge for the Ancestors, Part the Monograph Is a Hefty 602 Pages, Packed 1: Landscape and Monuments

    Stonehenge for the Ancestors, Part the Monograph Is a Hefty 602 Pages, Packed 1: Landscape and Monuments

    Early View: Zitierfähige Online-Fassung mit vorläufiger Seitenzählung. Nach Erscheinen des gedruckten Bandes finden Sie den Beitrag mit den endgültigen Seitenzahlen im Open Access dort: http://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/arch-inf Den gedruckten Band erhalten Sie unter http://www.archaeologische-informationen.de. Early View: Quotable online version with preliminary pagination. After the printed volume has appeared you can find this article with its final pagination as open access publication there: http://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archParker-inf Pearson,The printed volumeM. et al.will (eds) be available (2020). there: Stonehenge http://www.archaeologische-informationen.de for the Ancestors 1 . Review of: Parker Pearson, M., Pollard, J., Rich- mations buried near the Cuckoo Stone are given ards, C., Thomas, J., Tilley, C. & Welham, K. but no further details are provided. (eds) (2020). Stonehenge for the Ancestors, Part The monograph is a hefty 602 pages, packed 1: Landscape and Monuments. Leiden: Side- with in-depth specialist reports and thorough stone Press. 606 pp, 202 illustrations (b/w), 190 excavation descriptions. The publisher Sidestone illustrations (colour), hb/pb/online. ISBN 978-90- Press has used an innovative publishing model, 8890-702-9. https://www.sidestone.com/books/ with the book available at various prices: an ex- stonehenge-for-the-ancestors-part-1 pensive hardback, a less expensive paperback, a very modestly priced downloadable PDF, or a free Susan Greaney version to read online. This aim to provide free public access is admirable; the website informs This is the first of four volumes setting out in full that it has been read online 890 times since pub- the results of the Stonehenge Riverside Project lication in October 2020.
  • An Examination of Regionality in the Iron Age Settlements and Landscape of West Wales

    An Examination of Regionality in the Iron Age Settlements and Landscape of West Wales

    STONES, BONES AND HOMES: An Examination of Regionality in the Iron Age Settlements and Landscape of West Wales Submitted by: Geraldine Louise Mate Student Number 31144980 Submitted on the 3rd of November 2003, in partial fulfilment of the requirements of a Bachelor of Arts with Honours Degree School of Social Science, University of Queensland This thesis represents original research undertaken for a Bachelor of Arts Honours Degree at the University of Queensland, and was completed during 2003. The interpretations presented in this thesis are my own and do not represent the view of any other individual or group Geraldine Louise Mate ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page i Declaration ii Table of Contents iii List of Tables vi List of Figures vii Abstract ix Acknowledgements x 1. The Iron Age in West Wales 1 1.1 Research Question 1 1.2 Area of Investigation 2 1.3 An Approach to the Iron Age 2 1.4 Rationale of Thesis 5 1.5 Thesis Content and Organisation 6 2. Perspectives on Iron Age Britain 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Perspectives on the Iron Age 7 2.2.1 Progression of Interpretations 8 2.2.2 General Picture of Iron Age Society 11 2.2.3 Iron Age Settlements and Structures, and Their Part in Ritual 13 2.2.4 Pre-existing Landscape 20 2.3 Interpretive Approaches to the Iron Age 20 2.3.1 Landscape 21 2.3.2 Material Culture 27 2.4 Methodology 33 2.4.1 Assessment of Methods Available 33 2.4.2 Methodology Selected 35 2.4.3 Rationale and Underlying Assumptions for the Methodology Chosen 36 2.5 Summary 37 iii 3.
  • Woodhenge Story of Recent Excavation

    Woodhenge Story of Recent Excavation

    Durrington WOODHENGE STORY OF RECENT EXCAVATION A RECOVERED WILTSHIRE MONUMENT (From a Correspondent) Woodhenge, as a name formed on the analogy of Stonehenge, to signify a prehistoric structure made not of stone but of wood, and a structure, it may be added, no longer in existence as it would be if it were of stone, but decayed to the point of annihilation in the course of decades of centuries, is now a familiar word. It was originally applied, as is common knowledge, to a site in Wiltshire which was detected for the first time in December, l925 and has been since then carefully excavated; and another Woodhenge was discovered quite recently in a field near Norwich. Both discoveries were made possible by that new resource of archeology, photography from the air, and both have been described in archeological journals. There is now published, however, the complete story of the Wiltshire Woodhenge, by Mrs. B. K Cunnington, who with her husband carried out the excavations on the site during the summers of 1926-27-28. (WOODHENGE. By M. E. Cunnington. Devizes: Simpson and Co. 25s. net) It is a highly detailed piece of work, illustrated by a large number of photographic and other plates, and containing special reports on the human remains by Sir Arthur Keith, on the animal remains by Dr. J. Wilfred Jackson, and on other remains by Mr. A. S. Kennard, Mr. B. B. Woodward, Mr. C. D. Heginbothom, and others. The volume contains also what appears to be an exhaustive inventory of everything which came to light during the diggings.
  • W Dolinie Łupawskich Megalitów

    W Dolinie Łupawskich Megalitów

    W dolinie łupawskich megalitów Megaliths Na środkowym Pomorzu, w ostępach leśnych nad rzeką Łupawą przetrwały of the Łupawa Valley wielkie kamienne grobowce sprzed ponad 5000 lat. Kto je wzniósł? Jakie tajemnice ukrywają? Zagubione w leśnej głuszy, PRZEWODNIK GUIDE czekają na swoich odkrywców. In central Pomerania, in the backwoods by Łupawa River, mighty stone tombs from over 5000 years ago have been preserved. Who made them? What secrets do they keep? Lost among dense forest, they await their explorers. Gmina Potęgowo Dolina Łupawskich Megalitów Autorka logotypu: Karolina Gołębiowska Europejski Szlak Megalitów – Polska Anglia: Szkocja: Francja: Niemcy: Polska: 1. Stonehenge (Anglia, Salisbury) - 23. Maes Howe(Srkocja, Orkady) - tolos 31. Jaskinia Czarownic (ArIes, Fontvieil- 43. Wilsen (Meklemburgia) - kopiec krąg kamienny 24. Callanish (Szkocja, Hybrydy) - krąg le) - grobowce z dolmenami Runowo – XVIII-wieczny pałac „Bocianie 2. Averbury (Angha, Wiltshire) - kromlech kamienny i aIeja menhirów 32. Dissignac Tumulus (Loire-Atlantique, 44. Klecken (Dolna Saksonia) - grobowiec Gmina Potęgowo Gniazdo”. Obecnie ośrodek wypoczynkowy 3. Silbury Hill (Anglia, Wiltshire) - 25. Clach an Trushal (Szkocja) Saint-Nazaire) - tumulus trapezowaty (kolonie indiańskie, traperskie, obozy kopiec - najwyższy menhir w Szkocji 33. Barnenez (Bretania) - karn 45. Sachsenwald - grobowce bezkomoro- zaprasza do odkrywania jeździeckie - jazda konna, plenery rzeźbiarsko 4. Cairhholy (Anglia, Kircudbright) - Na europejskim 26. Easter Aquhorthies (Szkocja) - krąg 34. La Grotte Aux Fees (Indre-et-Loire) we - hipotetyczna kolebka budowni- – malarskie itp.) Tel. 598115149 grobowiec kamienny - dolmen czych megalitów z Doliny Łupawy megalitów, pałaców, starych 5. Giant’s Hill (Anglia, Skendleby) - szlaku 27. Ring of Brotdgar (Szkoicja, Orkady) 35. Gavrinis (Bretania) - karn 46. Everstorfer Forst k. Barendorf (Me- grobowiec - krąg kamienny - wpisany na listę 36.