DOCSLIB.ORG

Corporate Presentation February 2013 Corporate Presentation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Corporate Presentation February 2013 Corporate Presentation Corporate Presentation February 2013 Corporate Presentation Table of Contents 1. Corporate Summary 2. Grand Rapids Overview 3. Hoole Project Details 4. Exploration Portfolio Appendices A. Management and Director Biographies B. Forward Looking Statements Advisory 1 Corporate Summary 2 Highlights High Quality Oil Sands Asset Base • 100% ownership of over 202,000 net acres of oil sands leases • Cavalier’s oil sands and Carbonate bitumen assets have best estimate discovered exploitable bitumen in place (“DEBIP”) of 3.2 Bbbls and undiscovered exploitable bitumen in place (“UEBIP”) of 4.5 Bbbls(1) Eagles Nest asset provides additional upside with discovered bitumen in place (“DBIP”) of 0.4 Bbbls and undiscovered bitumen in place (“UDBIP”) of 1.6 Bbbls(1) • Assets are in areas which are currently seeing significant development activity Near Term Production from Large Resource Position at Hoole • Multi phase Grand Rapids project with expected production capacity of 80,000+ bbl/d by 2022 • Probable reserves of 93 MMbbls (B-tax 10% NPV of $379 million) and additional best estimate economic contingent resources of 719 MMbbls (B-tax 10% NPV best estimate of $1.9 billion)(2) • Submitted 10,000 bbl/d Phase 1 application in November 2012 with first production expected in 2016 Significant Upside in Bitumen Carbonates Resource at Saleski and Other Lands • Best estimate 1.6 Bbbls DEBIP and 4.5 Bbbls UEBIP with best estimate contingent resources of 492 MMbbls(3) • Offsetting Laricina’s producing pilot at Saleski that has recently demonstrated peak production of 1,200 bbl/d from a single well-pair(4) • Cavalier expects to develop its carbonates following broader industry commercialization/optimization Strong Management Team and Board Combined with Highly Experienced and Successful Shareholder • Experience building large oil projects, with over $5 billion executed on in a variety of operating and business environments • History of executing value enhancing transactions that have generated material returns and liquidity for shareholders • Opportunity for additional growth through strategic acquisitions • Paramount Resources Ltd. (“Paramount”), Cavalier’s current shareholder, has a proven track record of creating significant value in the oil sands across multiple transactions over the past decade (e.g. NAOSC and MEG) Cavalier is a private pure play in situ oil sands company with a very strong management team and a highly experienced shareholder _______________ See forward looking statement advisory for disclosure on reserves and resource information and definitions. 1. McDaniel reports effective December 31, 2012, October 31, 2011 and April 30, 2010. 2. Hoole volumes and NPV as per McDaniel report effective December 31, 2012. 3 3. Carbonates volumes are contingent resources (technology under development) as per McDaniel report effective October 31, 2011. 4. Laricina September 2012 corporate presentation. Corporate Snapshot Background Cavalier Asset Portfolio Overview • In November 2011, Paramount contributed seed capital and all of its oil sands and carbonate bitumen assets to Cavalier • Cavalier has a 100% working interest in its main project areas • Cavalier has 75MM shares outstanding, 100% owned by Paramount • Cavalier is targeting to produce 80,000+ bbl/d from the Grand Rapids formation at its Hoole property with significant additional development potential from its portfolio of exploration lands − Includes carbonates properties adjacent to and on trend with the Laricina / Osum Saleski project, Eagles Nest and Christina Lake • New capital to be raised to fund ongoing development and the evaluation of opportunities for the achievement of Reserves and Contingent Resource Summary(1) greater scale in core areas Reserves Contingent Resources Net Present Value (B-Tax 10%) • Cavalier plans to remain private through initial Probable Low Best High development phase Asset Undev. Estimate Estimate Estimate MMbbls MMbbls MMbbls MMbbls • Cavalier is led by Dr. Will Roach, former President and (2) Hoole 93 511 719 903 CEO of UTS Energy Corporation Saleski Carbonates(3) - - 380 567 − UTS was sold to Total E&P Canada Ltd. for $1.5 billion Other Carbonate Leases(3) - - 111 184 in 2010 plus the spinout of SilverBirch, which was sold for an additional $500 million in 2012 _______________ 1. See forward looking statement advisory for disclosure on reserves and resource information and definitions. 2. Hoole volumes are probable undeveloped reserves and economic contingent resources as per McDaniel report effective December 31, 2012. 4 3. Carbonates volumes are contingent resources (technology under development) as per McDaniel report effective October 31, 2011. Hoole Project Overview Significant Resource Base with Attractive Economics • Probable reserves of 93 MMbbls (B-tax 10% NPV of $379 million) and best estimate economic contingent resources of 719 MMbbls (B-tax 10% NPV best estimate of $1.9 billion)(1) • Targeting the laterally continuous and homogeneous Grand Rapids formation • Use of proven SAGD technology is expected to result in strong operating netbacks across a wide range of oil prices • Proximal to high grade road networks, power and gas infrastructure and substantial announced bitumen takeaway and diluent return capacity • Multi phase project with estimated total production capacity of 80,000+ bbl/d by 2022 • Growth opportunities through strategic acquisitions Development Stage Project with Expected Near Term Production • Filed regulatory application in November 2012 for 10,000 bbl/d Phase 1 with first production expected in 2016 – 93 MMbbls of probable reserves(1) at Phase 1 were recognized in Q1 2013 as a result • Delineation drilling for Phase 1 completed in 2010 (74 wells) • Environmental modeling complete and water source/disposal is selected, subject to regulatory approval • Preliminary front end engineering and design work completed • Risk mitigation strategy being implemented through construction Hoole is targeted to be a material 80,000+ bbl/d of modularized components built off-site project located in the core of the Grand Rapids • Ability to truck production volumes for Phase 1 until area pipeline resource play with near term production expected infrastructure is built and multiple opportunities for achievement of greater scale _______________ 1. Hoole volumes and NPV as per McDaniel report effective December 31, 2012. See forward looking statement advisory for disclosure on reserves and resource information and definitions. 5 Overview of Carbonates Assets Growth Potential in an Emerging Resource Play Cavalier’s Carbonates Assets • Over 128,000 acres within the Carbonate portfolio located on the highly prospective Grosmont Carbonate Trend • Holdings are located adjacent to the regional projects of Laricina, Osum and Husky and proximate to those of several majors including Shell, ConocoPhillips and Suncor • Best estimate 1.6 Bbbls DEBIP and 4.5 Bbbls UEBIP with best estimate contingent resource of 492 MMbbls(1) • Advancement / selection of optimal extraction technologies by industry peers will set the pace for Cavalier’s development of its Carbonates portfolio following Hoole advancement • Ongoing development of new technologies by industry peers also expected to improve economics and recovery factors Increasing industry activity in the carbonates continues to prove up the resource potential of Cavalier’s Properties _______________ 1. Carbonates volumes are contingent resources (technology under development) as per McDaniel report effective October 31, 2011. See forward looking statement advisory for disclosure on resource information and definitions. 6 Cavalier’s Current Shareholder Paramount Resources Highly Experienced and Successful Shareholder • Paramount is TSX listed with a market capitalization of ~$3 billion; insider ownership > 50% – Founded in 1974 by Clayton Riddell, Chairman and CEO • Strong history of creating shareholder value • Paramount has spun-out three public entities: Perpetual Energy, Trilogy Energy and MGM Energy which have a combined market cap of ~$3.5 billion Paramount currently holds ~16% interest in Trilogy and ~14% interest in MGM Energy • Proven, successful explorer and partner in oil sands, demonstrated by ~$1.0B in value realized over the past decade (excluding Cavalier): – Acquired, successfully delineated and then sold leases in the southern Athabasca region which form the backbone of what today is MEG Energy’s successful Christina Lake Project – Partnered with North American Oil Sands Corp. (“NAOSC”) to combine and further delineate oil sands leases and to grow the asset base; ultimately becoming a shareholder of NAOSC through the contribution of Paramount’s interests in the properties – Statoil acquired NAOSC in 2007 for $2.2 billion; Paramount owned ~30% of NAOSC generating $680 million in cash proceeds – Sold Paramount’s delineated Surmont project to MEG Energy in 2007 for $300 million including $150 million in cash and 3.7 million MEG shares • Service agreement in place between Paramount and Cavalier covering the provision of a wide range of services by Paramount including drilling and completions, land, marketing, accounting, human resources and community relations Paramount, Cavalier’s current shareholder, has a proven track record of creating significant value in the oil sands across multiple transactions over the past decade 7 Management Team and Board of Directors Management Experience William Roach, Ph.D., P.Eng. • Dr. Roach has 30 years of experience, more recently as President & CEO of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • . . Expanding the Mission . . . Facilitating the Future PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE CANADA
    PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE CANADA ANNUAL REPOR T 2007 . expanding the mission . facilitating the future PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE CANADA Mission PTAC facilitates innovation, collaborative research and technology development, demonstration and deployment for a responsible Canadian hydrocarbon energy industry. Technical Areas Enhanced Environmental Management Emission Reduction / Eco-Efficiency Energy Efficiency Resource Access Air Ecological Soil and Groundwater Water Improved Oil and Gas Recovery Conventional Oil and Gas Recovery CO2 Enhanced Hydrocarbon Recovery Coalbed Methane/Unconventional Gas Oil Sands Heavy Oil Reservoir Engineering Geosciences Cost Reductions/Operations Alternative Energy Production Engineering Facility Design Drilling and Well Completion Inactive Wells Instrumentation / Measurement E-Business Fundamental Research Health and Safety Innovation R&D Funding Security Telecommunications Upgrading, Refining, Petrochemical Technologies, and Transportation Hydrocarbon Upgrading Refining Petrochemicals Hydrogen Gasification Pipelines Integration Transportation ANNUAL REPOR T 2 0 0 7 . expanding oppor tunities . 2007 Key Accomplishments Message from the Board of Directors Established a new vision: to help Canada The hydrocarbon energy sector in Canada has experienced significant become a global hydrocarbon energy changes since PTAC was first established, and in 2007 our commitment to our technology leader. This vision is supported members led us to examine our organization and the role we play in the indus- by a broadened
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Information Form 2014 March 9, 2015
    ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM 2014 MARCH 9, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SELECTED TERMS ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 CONVERSIONS ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 CONVENTIONS ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 SPECIAL NOTES TO READER .................................................................................................................................. 5 BAYTEX ENERGY CORP. ......................................................................................................................................... 9 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF OUR BUSINESS ................................................................................................. 10 RISK FACTORS ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 DESCRIPTION OF OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS ..................................................................................... 11 DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Big Oil's Oily Grasp
    Big Oil’s Oily Grasp The making of Canada as a Petro-State and how oil money is corrupting Canadian politics Daniel Cayley-Daoust and Richard Girard Polaris Institute December 2012 The Polaris Institute is a public interest research organization based in Canada. Since 1997 Polaris has been dedicated to developing tools and strategies to take action on major public policy issues, including the corporate power that lies behind public policy making, on issues of energy security, water rights, climate change, green economy and global trade. Polaris Institute 180 Metcalfe Street, Suite 500 Ottawa, ON K2P 1P5 Phone: 613-237-1717 Fax: 613-237-3359 Email: [email protected] www.polarisinstitute.org Cover image by Malkolm Boothroyd Table of Contents Introduction 1 1. Corporations and Industry Associations 3 2. Lobby Firms and Consultant Lobbyists 7 3. Transparency 9 4. Conclusion 11 Appendices Appendix A, Companies ranked by Revenue 13 Appendix B, Companies ranked by # of Communications 15 Appendix C, Industry Associations ranked by # of Communications 16 Appendix D, Consultant lobby firms and companies represented 17 Appendix E, List of individual petroleum industry consultant Lobbyists 18 Appendix F, Recurring topics from communications reports 21 References 22 ii Glossary of Acronyms AANDC Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada CAN Climate Action Network CAPP Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers CEAA Canadian Environmental Assessment Act CEPA Canadian Energy Pipelines Association CGA Canadian Gas Association DPOH
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts and Mitigations of in Situ Bitumen Production from Alberta Oil Sands
    Impacts and Mitigations of In Situ Bitumen Production from Alberta Oil Sands Neil Edmunds, P.Eng. V.P. Enhanced Oil Recovery Laricina Energy Ltd. Calgary, Alberta Submission to the XXIst World Energy Congress Montréal 2010 - 1 - Introduction: In Situ is the Future of Oil Sands The currently recognized recoverable resource in Alberta’s oil sands is 174 billion barrels, second largest in the world. Of this, about 150 billion bbls, or 85%, is too deep to mine and must be recovered by in situ methods, i.e. from drill holes. This estimate does not include any contributions from the Grosmont carbonate platform, or other reservoirs that are now at the early stages of development. Considering these additions, together with foreseeable technological advances, the ultimate resource potential is probably some 50% higher, perhaps 315 billion bbls. Commercial in situ bitumen recovery was made possible in the 1980's and '90s by the development in Alberta, of the Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) process. SAGD employs surface facilities very similar to steamflooding technology developed in California in the ’50’s and 60’s, but differs significantly in terms of the well count, geometry and reservoir flow. Conventional steamflooding employs vertical wells and is based on the idea of pushing the oil from one well to another. SAGD uses closely spaced pairs of horizontal wells, and effectively creates a melt cavity in the reservoir, from which mobilized bitumen can be collected at the bottom well. Figure 1. Schematic of a SAGD Well Pair (courtesy Cenovus) Economically and environmentally, SAGD is a major advance compared to California-style steam processes: it uses about 30% less steam (hence water and emissions) for the same oil recovery; it recovers more of the oil in place; and its surface impact is modest.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notice Laricina Energy Ltd. Germain Project Expansion Proposed Terms of Reference for Environmental Impact Assessment
    Public Notice Laricina Energy Ltd. Germain Project Expansion Proposed Terms of Reference for Environmental Impact Assessment Laricina is proposing the Germain Project Expansion to expand the Germain Project by 150,000 gross barrels per day (bbls/d) of bitumen production to 155,000 bbls/d. The primary zone of interest at Germain is the Grand Rapids Formation. Laricina has Grand Rapids oil sands rights in 63 (gross) sections which offer significant resource potential, containing an estimated 2.3 billion barrels of bitumen in place within the lease area. Current and future innovations of in situ technology will be utilized to develop Laricina’s oil sands assets at Germain. Laricina’s Energy’s total land base at Germain is 71 sections within Townships 83-85, Ranges 21-23 west of the 4th Meridian and is located within the west Athabasca Oil Sands region, approximately 46 km northeast of the community of Wabasca-Desmarais. The Director responsible for Environmental Assessment has directed that an Environmental Impact Assessment Report be prepared for the Germain Project Expansion. Laricina has prepared a proposed Terms of Reference for this Environmental Impact Assessment, and through this public notice, invites the public to review this document. Any comments filed concerning the proposed Terms of Reference will be accessible to the public. The proposed Terms of Reference and associated project information can be viewed at the following locations: Laricina Wabasca Office , 2155 Mistassiniy Road, Wabasca, Alberta T0G 2K0 Laricina Energy Ltd. Head Office, 4100, 150-6th Ave. SW, Calgary, Alberta T2P 3Y7 www.laricinaenergy.com Alberta Environment’s Register of Environmental Assessment, 111 Twin Atria Bldg., 4999 – 98 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, Attn: Melanie Daneluk; http://environment.alberta.ca/02313.html For further information on the Germain Project Expansion or copies of the proposed Terms of Reference and associated project information please contact: Laricina Energy Ltd Tel: 403-718-9300 4100, Suncor Energy Centre Fax: 403-263-0767 150-6th Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Proving Something Big – Laricina's Projects at Saleski and Germain
    Proving Something Big Laricina's Projects at Saleski and Germain Presented by Sandeep Solanki Director, Germain Asset and Innovation November 14, 2012 2 Forward-looking statements advisory This Laricina Energy Ltd. (the “Company”) presentation contains certain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, statements concerning estimates of exploitable original-bitumen-in-place, predicted recovery factors, steam-to-oil ratios and well production rates, estimated recoverable resources as defined below, expected regulatory filing, review and approval dates, construction and start-up timelines and schedules, company project potential production volumes as well as comparisons to other projects, statements relating to the continued overall advancement of the Company’s projects, comparisons of recoverable resources to other oil sands projects, estimated relative supply costs, potential cost reductions, recovery and production increases resulting from the application of new technology and recovery schemes, estimates of carbon sequestration capacity, costs for carbon capture and sequestration and possible implementation schedule for carbon capture and sequestration processes or related emissions mitigation or reduction scheme and other statements which are not historical facts. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements as there can be no assurance that the plans, intentions or expectations upon which they are based will occur. By their nature forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, known and unknown risks and uncertainties, both generally and specific, that contribute to the possibility that the predictions, forecasts, projections and other forward-looking statements will not occur. Although the Company believes that the expectations represented by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct and, accordingly that actual results will be consistent with the forward-looking statements.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Oil Sands Industry Quarterly Update
    ALBERTA OIL SANDS INDUSTRY QUARTERLY UPDATE WINTER 2013 Reporting on the period: Sep. 18, 2013 to Dec. 05, 2013 2 ALBERTA OIL SANDS INDUSTRY QUARTERLY UPDATE Canada has the third-largest oil methods. Alberta will continue to rely All about reserves in the world, after Saudi to a greater extent on in situ production Arabia and Venezuela. Of Canada’s in the future, as 80 per cent of the 173 billion barrels of oil reserves, province’s proven bitumen reserves are the oil sands 170 billion barrels are located in too deep underground to recover using Background of an Alberta, and about 168 billion barrels mining methods. are recoverable from bitumen. There are essentially two commercial important global resource This is a resource that has been methods of in situ (Latin for “in developed for decades but is now place,” essentially meaning wells are gaining increased global attention used rather than trucks and shovels). as conventional supplies—so-called In cyclic steam stimulation (CSS), “easy” oil—continue to be depleted. high-pressure steam is injected into The figure of 168 billion barrels TABLE OF CONTENTS directional wells drilled from pads of bitumen represents what is for a period of time, then the steam considered economically recoverable is left to soak in the reservoir for a All about the oil sands with today’s technology, but with period, melting the bitumen, and 02 new technologies, this reserve then the same wells are switched estimate could be significantly into production mode, bringing the increased. In fact, total oil sands Mapping the oil sands bitumen to the surface.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grosmont Formation: a Massive "By-Passed" Pay Zone
    Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists - University Outreach Lecture Tour The Grosmont Formation: a massive "by-passed" pay zone. Jen Russel-Houston, Ph.D., P. Geol., Osum Oil Sands Corp., Calgary, Alberta [email protected] The Upper Devonian Frasnian Grosmont Formation located in northern Alberta is a bitumen-bearing carbonate unit with an estimated 50.5 billion cubic meters (318 billion bbls) of bitumen in place (ERCB, 2008). Recovering just 20% of the resources within the Grosmont would increase Canada's reserves by about one-third. Currently, no recovery has been assigned to the Grosmont Formation by any corporate or government agency. The Grosmont Formation carbonate rocks are richly saturated with bitumen in the Saleski area of northern Alberta. The shallow marine carbonate strata dip to the southwest and are eroded at the angular unconformity with the overlying Cretaceous-aged clastic rocks. The Grosmont Formation has A. Stratigraphy of the Saleski Area highlighting the angular unconformity of the Devoian been divided into four informal members; the Grosmont A, B, C, Grosmont with the Cretaceous Mannville Group. Vertical exaggeration is 50 x. B. Map of and D in order of decreasing stratigraphic age. The lithofacies Alberta with the Saleski area identified and shown at a smaller scale. Subcrop edges are marked of the Grosmont Formation at Saleski represent open marine to that represent where the Grosmont strata are eroded to zero thickness at the sub-Cretaceous restricted marine deposits and record an overall shallowing- unconformity. upward succession. The sediments were deposited in a wide carbonate platform setting (150 km by 600 km) and subjected to regional diagenetic processes related to the unconformity.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Pathways to Produce Heavy Oil from Canadian Carbonates
    ALBERTA HEAVY OIL Finding Pathways to Produce Heavy Oil From Canadian Carbonates Stephen Rassenfoss, JPT Emerging Technology Editor early 2 million bbl of ultraheavy crude are produced each for oil sands is not a good fit in carbonates. But a mix of meth- N day from Canadian oil sands, but the notion of also pro- ods used for bitumen production worked well enough to con- ducing bitumen from reservoirs made of carbonate rock can vince the partners to plan a commercial test. that they plan to spark skeptical remarks. use for the first commercial development in the formation. They are likely to say something like: “Carbonates are very The Laricina-Osum joint venture has filed for a permit to different. In carbonates, it is just different,” said Daniel Yang, produce as much as 10,700 B/D from up to 32 wells, with first director of reservoir engineering at Laricina Energy, who has a oil in 2015. Husky and Shell have also filed for permission to different reading of the exploration history of formations that do pilot projects with the Alberta Energy Regulator, the agen- hold more than 400 billion bbl of the crude. cy formerly known as the Energy Resources Conservation Laricina has partnered with a second Calgary independent, Board (ERCB). Osum Oil Sands, to try to prove that bitumen can be commer- “It is going like early development in major oil sands basins cially produced from the Grosmont formation, which holds 75% such as the Athabasca, where there were many field pilots,” said of the heavy crude known as bitumen in Alberta’s carbonates.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers Producer Members
    Producer Members - Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers https://www.capp.ca/about-us/membership/producer-members Producer Members From emerging two person operations to internationally recognized corporations employing thousands of people, CAPP's more than 90 producer members actively and responsibly explore for, develop and produce Canada's petroleum resources. A Adeco Exploration Company Ltd. Aitken Creek Gas Storage Anadarko Canada E&P Ltd. ARC Resources Ltd. Aspenleaf Energy Limited Athabasca Oil Corporation B Birchcliff Energy Ltd. Bonavista Energy Corporation Bonterra Energy Corp. BP Canada Energy Group ULC C Canadian Natural Resources Limited Canbriam Energy Inc. Cenovus Energy Inc. Chance Oil and Gas Limited Chevron Canada Resources ConocoPhillips Canada Resources Corp. 1 of 5 20/08/2018, 12:02 Producer Members - Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers https://www.capp.ca/about-us/membership/producer-members Corridor Resources Inc. D Devon Canada Corporation E Encana Corporation Enerplus Corporation Equinor Canada Ltd. ExxonMobil Canada Ltd. F Freehold Royalties Ltd. G H Husky Energy I Imperial Oil Resources Limited InPlay Oil Corp. J Japan Canada Oil Sands Limited K Kainaiwa Resources Inc. Kaisen Energy Corp. Keyera Corp. Koch Oil Sands Operating ULC 2 of 5 20/08/2018, 12:02 Producer Members - Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers https://www.capp.ca/about-us/membership/producer-members L Laricina Energy Ltd. Longshore Resources Ltd. M Mancal Energy Inc. MEG Energy Corp. Modern Resources Inc. Murphy Oil Company Ltd. N NAL Resources Limited Nexen Energy ULC (A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of CNOOC Limited) NuVista Energy Ltd. O Orlen Upstream Canada Ltd. Osum Oil Sands Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • In Situ Solvent Assisted and Solvent-Based Recovery: Workshop 1
    IN SITU SOLVENT ASSISTED AND SOLVENT-BASED RECOVERY: WORKSHOP 1 SOLVENT LEADERSHIP SERIES May 26, 2017 Suite 2540, 801 – 6 Ave SW 403.297.7261 Calgary, Alberta 403.818.0041 Canada, T2P 3W2 albertainnovates.ca Solvent Leadership Series WORKSHOP 1: IN SITU SOLVENT ASSISTED AND SOLVENT-BASED RECOVERY May 26 2017, Alberta Innovates Riverview Room, Floor 26, 801 6 Ave SW, Calgary, Alberta Join Alberta Innovates in collaboration with COSIA for a “deep dive” on perspectives from the research community on the role of solvents in recovery of in situ bitumen resources. This session is intended to connect industry players with some of the recent advances and outcomes from experimental, analytical and numerical research programs that can be useful in taking solvent pilots and demonstrations to the next level. This session is limited to 20 participants. AGENDA Sign in and Coffee 8:45 to 9:00 a.m. 1. Welcome remarks - John Zhou, VP, Clean Energy and Candice Paton, Director, 9:00 to 9:15 a.m. Recovery technologies 2. Key Presenter: John Shaw – University of Alberta NSERC IRC in Petroleum 9:15 to 10:15 a.m. Thermodynamics. Phase behaviour and transport properties of bitumen and heavy oil + solvent mixtures. 3. Key Presenter: John Chen – University of Calgary NSERC Foundation CMG IRC in 10:15 to 11:15 a.m. Reservoir Modelling. Advanced steam-additive recovery processes for oil sands Coffee Break 11:15 to 11:30 a.m. 4. Key Presenter: Haibo Huang - Director, AACI Research Program. 11:30 to 12:30 p.m. Linking technology development and field piloting 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Stratigraphy and Reservoir Units of the Grosmont Formation: Laricina’S Saleski and Burnt Lakes Leases J
    Regional Stratigraphy and Reservoir Units of the Grosmont Formation: Laricina’s Saleski and Burnt Lakes Leases J. Hopkins Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary [email protected] K. Wilde, S. Christiensen and K. Barrett Laricina Energy Limited., Calgary Introduction The Grosmont Formation is comprised of shallow-water carbonates deposited in a platform to ramp succession during the Late Devonian. Early dolomitization pervasively replaced the limestone hosts. Erosion and truncation of the Grosmont Formation along its subcrop edge established a karst regime that resulted in leaching of the dolostones by meteoric waters, fracturing, and local clay infiltration. An extensive seal above the subcrop was provided by Lower Cretaceous shale. In the Early Tertiary, the Grosmont Formation was tilted to the west prior to bitumen charge. Dolomitization and karst processes have significantly altered the fabric of Grosmont carbonates and several studies of reservoir properties emphasize reservoir heterogeneity. In this presentation we emphasize a regional stratigraphic framework to compare and contrast reservoir properties of two lease areas roughly 100km apart: Saleski Twp085 Rge19W4 and Burnt Lakes Twp095 Rge24W4 some100km to the northwest. Regional Stratigraphy The Grosmont Formation is divided into four members separated by three regionally distributed argillaceous carbonate horizons, variously referred to as shale or marl markers. Correlation of 5 wells spaced over 105km is shown in Figure 1. The members have been interpreted as chronostratigraphic units by Cutler (1983) and are identified, from base to top, as the Lower Grosmont, Upper Grosmont 1, Upper Grosmont 2, Upper Grosmont 3; designated LG,UG1 UG2, UG3 or A,B,C,D in contemporary terminologies.
    [Show full text]