DOCSLIB.ORG

Producto Interno Bruto Por Entidad Federativa 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Producto Interno Bruto Por Entidad Federativa 2018 COMUNICADO DE PRENSA NÚM. 694/19 16 DE DICIEMBRE DE 2019 PÁGINA 1/3 PRODUCTO INTERNO BRUTO POR ENTIDAD FEDERATIVA 2018 El INEGI presenta los resultados del Producto Interno Bruto por Entidad Federativa 2018, los cuales se derivan del Sistema de Cuentas Nacionales de México y se muestran con desagregaciones en valores corrientes, a precios constantes, índices de precios implícitos e índices de volumen físico. Esto permite observar la dinámica de las entidades federativas y su participación en el Producto Interno Bruto (PIB) nacional. En términos nominales, la Ciudad de México, el Estado de México1, Nuevo León, Jalisco, Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave, Guanajuato, Coahuila de Zaragoza, Puebla, Chihuahua, Sonora y Baja California, aportaron de manera conjunta el 66.2% del PIB nacional a precios básicos2 en 2018. Durante el año en cuestión, las entidades que más contribuyeron al PIB total de las actividades terciarias (comercio y servicios) fueron: la Ciudad de México, el Estado de México, Nuevo León, Jalisco, Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave, Guanajuato, Puebla, Baja California, Michoacán de Ocampo, Chihuahua y Tamaulipas, participando con el 69.4% del producto total de estas actividades. En las actividades secundarias (sector industrial), las principales aportaciones fueron observadas en Nuevo León, el Estado de México, Jalisco, Coahuila de Zaragoza, Campeche, Guanajuato, la Ciudad de México, Sonora, Chihuahua, Baja California y Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave con 64.2 por ciento. Por su parte, Jalisco, Michoacán de Ocampo, Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave, Sinaloa, Chihuahua, Sonora, Guanajuato, Puebla, el Estado de México, Durango y Chiapas, destacaron al agregar el 67.7% del PIB en las actividades primarias (agricultura, cría y explotación de animales, aprovechamiento forestal, pesca y caza). 1 Al hacer referencia a la entidad México (número 15 en el catálogo oficial de entidades federativas) se utiliza el convencionalismo de “Estado de México” para fines expositivos. 2 Son los precios de los bienes o servicios valorados en el establecimiento del productor. Se excluyen los gastos de transporte y los impuestos netos a los productos como el IVA. COMUNICACIÓN SOCIAL COMUNICADO DE PRENSA NÚM. 694/19 16 DE DICIEMBRE DE 2019 PÁGINA 2/3 COMPORTAMIENTO DEL PRODUCTO INTERNO BRUTO POR ENTIDAD FEDERATIVA 2018 (Variación porcentual anual) Actividades Estado Total Primarias Secundarias Terciarias Estados Unidos Mexicanos 2.1 2.4 0.5 2.9 Aguascalientes 3.4 3.4 2.8 3.8 Baja California 2.3 1.8 3.8 1.4 Baja California Sur 17.2 4.0 39.8 7.2 Campeche (-) 1.6 7.4 (-) 2.4 2.4 Coahuila de Zaragoza 1.3 5.4 (-) 0.3 3.0 Colima 2.5 3.6 (-) 1.5 3.8 Chiapas (-) 2.1 1.1 (-) 11.2 0.2 Chihuahua 1.6 3.3 (-) 0.6 3.1 Ciudad de México 2.7 4.1 0.6 2.9 Durango 0.8 (-) 1.8 (-) 0.5 2.0 Guanajuato 1.2 4.5 (-) 3.8 4.1 Guerrero 3.0 (-) 0.7 6.3 2.5 Hidalgo 3.2 (-) 0.7 1.8 4.2 Jalisco 2.9 3.6 0.7 3.9 Estado de México 2.7 (-) 11.0 1.9 3.2 Michoacán de Ocampo 1.9 4.1 (-) 1.1 2.3 Morelos (-) 0.5 7.9 (-) 4.0 0.8 Nayarit (-) 1.0 (-) 5.4 (-) 6.2 0.8 Nuevo León 3.6 0.6 4.0 3.4 Oaxaca 4.7 2.9 11.9 2.6 Puebla 2.4 2.1 1.6 2.8 Querétaro 3.0 0.0 1.8 3.9 Quintana Roo 5.1 14.3 5.9 4.9 San Luis Potosí 4.2 7.6 4.0 4.2 Sinaloa 2.7 6.5 5.2 1.4 Sonora 1.2 2.6 (-) 0.5 2.6 Tabasco (-) 8.2 2.9 (-) 12.8 0.1 Tamaulipas 2.2 (-) 6.8 4.0 1.7 Tlaxcala 3.4 1.2 7.8 1.3 Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave 2.3 3.2 3.4 1.6 Yucatán 3.2 5.3 1.4 3.8 Zacatecas (-) 0.1 3.2 (-) 2.2 0.6 Fuente: INEGI. COMUNICACIÓN SOCIAL COMUNICADO DE PRENSA NÚM. 694/19 16 DE DICIEMBRE DE 2019 PÁGINA 3/3 En el año de referencia, los estados que reportaron el mayor crecimiento anual en su PIB en términos reales fueron Baja California Sur con una tasa de 17.2%, Quintana Roo 5.1%, Oaxaca 4.7%, San Luis Potosí 4.2%, Nuevo León 3.6%, Tlaxcala y Aguascalientes con 3.4% en cada entidad, Yucatán e Hidalgo 3.2% cada uno, Guerrero y Querétaro 3% en cada caso, todas las tasas con relación al 2017. Se anexa Nota Técnica Para consultas de medios y periodistas, contactar a: [email protected] o llamar al teléfono (55) 52-78-10-00, exts. 1134, 1260 y 1241. Dirección de Atención a Medios / Dirección General Adjunta de Comunicación COMUNICACIÓN SOCIAL NOTA TÉCNICA PRODUCTO INTERNO BRUTO POR ENTIDAD FEDERATIVA 2018 Aspectos Generales Como parte del Sistema de Cuentas Nacionales de México el INEGI presenta los resultados del “Producto Interno Bruto por Entidad Federativa, 2018 preliminar. Año base 2013”, mediante los cuales se proporciona información para cada una de las entidades federativas y sus respectivas actividades económicas. La información contiene cifras en valores corrientes y a precios constantes de 2013, así como los índices de precios implícitos e índices de volumen físico correspondientes. COMUNICACIÓN SOCIAL Principales Resultados: Producto Interno Bruto por Entidad Federativa En 2018 el Producto Interno Bruto total a precios básicos resultó de 22,191,164 millones de pesos corrientes, monto integrado principalmente por la contribución de la Ciudad de México que participó con 3,631,195 millones, seguido por el Estado de México3 con 1,958,936 millones, Nuevo León 1,695,715 millones, Jalisco 1,575,126 millones, Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave 1,006,376 millones, Guanajuato 978,291 millones, Coahuila de Zaragoza 836,394 millones, Puebla 763,036 millones, Chihuahua 749,889 millones, Sonora 749,425 millones y Baja California con 743,763 millones. Este grupo de entidades generó el 66.2% del producto total (véase gráfico siguiente). Gráfica 1 PRODUCTO INTERNO BRUTO POR ENTIDAD FEDERATIVA EN 2018 (Estructura porcentual) Ciudad de México 16.4 Estado de México 8.8 Nuevo León 7.6 Jalisco 7.1 Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave 4.5 Guanajuato 4.4 Coahuila de Zaragoza 3.8 Puebla 3.4 Chihuahua 3.4 Sonora 3.4 Baja California 3.4 Tamaulipas 2.9 Michoacán de Ocampo 2.5 Campeche 2.5 Querétaro 2.4 San Luis Potosí 2.3 Tabasco 2.2 Sinaloa 2.2 Hidalgo 1.7 Quintana Roo 1.6 Oaxaca 1.6 Chiapas 1.5 Yucatán 1.5 Aguascalientes 1.4 Guerrero 1.4 Durango 1.2 Morelos 1.1 Baja California Sur 1.0 Zacatecas 0.9 Nayarit 0.7 Colima 0.6 Tlaxcala 0.6 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 NOTA: La suma de los parciales puede no coincidir con el total debido al redondeo. Fuente: INEGI. 3 Al hacer referencia a la entidad México (número 15 en el catálogo oficial de entidades federativas) se utiliza el convencionalismo de “Estado de México” para fines expositivos. COMUNICACIÓN SOCIAL Estructura del PIB Estatal por grupos de actividades económicas Actividades primarias Durante 2018, el PIB de las actividades primarias integradas por la agricultura, cría y explotación de animales, aprovechamiento forestal, pesca y caza alcanzaron 795,383 millones de pesos corrientes, cifra en la que Jalisco contribuyó con la mayor proporción con 12.5%, Michoacán de Ocampo 10.1%, Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave 7.4%, Sinaloa 7%, Chihuahua 6.9%, Sonora 6.2%, Guanajuato 4.7%, Puebla 3.6%, el Estado de México 3.2%, Durango 3.1% y Chiapas con 3 por ciento. El resto de los estados participó con el 32.3 por ciento. Gráfica 2 PRODUCTO INTERNO BRUTO DE LAS ACTIVIDADES PRIMARIAS EN 2018 (Estructura porcentual) Fuente: INEGI. COMUNICACIÓN SOCIAL Actividades Secundarias Las actividades secundarias conformadas por la minería, las industrias manufactureras, la construcción y la generación, transmisión y distribución de energía eléctrica y suministro de gas por ductos al consumidor final, registraron en 2018 un monto de 7,268,243 millones de pesos corrientes. Las entidades que en mayor medida aportaron a esta cifra fueron: Nuevo León 9.4%, el Estado de México con 7.3%, Jalisco 6.8%, Coahuila de Zaragoza 6.3%, Campeche4 6.1%, Guanajuato 5.2%, la Ciudad de México 5.1%, Sonora 4.9%, Chihuahua y Baja California 4.4% individualmente, y Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave 4.3 por ciento. El resto de los estados participaron de manera agregada con el 35.8 por ciento. Gráfica 3 PRODUCTO INTERNO BRUTO DE LAS ACTIVIDADES SECUNDARIAS EN 2018 (Estructura porcentual) Fuente: INEGI. 4 Para Campeche la Extracción de petróleo y gas, y la Perforación de pozos petroleros y de gas, representaron el 91.7% del total de las actividades secundarias; mientras que en Tabasco estas actividades aportaron el 80.5% del total de su actividad secundaria. COMUNICACIÓN SOCIAL Actividades secundarias sin considerar la minería petrolera Es importante mencionar que en algunos estados, la minería petrolera5 incide significativamente en su Producto Interno Bruto. Con objeto de conocer este impacto, en la siguiente gráfica se presentan las participaciones estatales de las actividades secundarias sin considerar dicha minería. Gráfica 4 PRODUCTO INTERNO BRUTO DE LAS ACTIVIDADES SECUNDARIAS EN 2018 SIN CONSIDERAR LA MINERÍA PETROLERA (Estructura porcentual) Nuevo León 10.3 Estado de México 8.1 Jalisco 7.5 Coahuila de Zaragoza 7.0 Guanajuato 5.8 Ciudad de México 5.7 Sonora 5.4 Chihuahua 4.9 Baja California 4.9 Puebla 4.5 Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave 4.3 Tamaulipas 3.9 Querétaro 3.4 San Luis Potosí 3.3 Aguascalientes 2.2 Hidalgo 2.1 Oaxaca 1.7 Sinaloa 1.6 Resto de los estados 13.4 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 Fuente: INEGI.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regions and Cities at a Glance 2018 – MEXICO Economic Trends In
    http://www.oecd.org/regional Regions and Cities at a Glance 2018 – MEXICO Economic trends in regions Regional gap in GDP per capita, 2003-16 Index of regional disparity in GDP per capita, 2016 GDP per capita in USD PPP Top 20 % richest over bottom 20% poorest regions 2016 2000 Ratio 140 000 Highest region 4 Small regions Large regions Campeche (TL3) (TL2) 120 000 48 980 USD 100 000 3 Second highest region 80 000 Mex ico City 39 860 USD 60 000 Mex ico 2 40 000 16 969 USD 20 000 1 Low est region 0 Chiapas 6 636 USD 2003 2010 2016 Country (number of regions considered) Mexico has high regional disparities. GDP per capita in Mexico City – the country’s second richest region after Campeche, where natural resources significantly contribute to the economy – was more than five times higher than in Chiapas in 2016. Even when resource rich regions such as Campeche or Tabasco are excluded, regional economic disparities in Mexico remain larger than in any other OECD country. However, regional disparities in terms of GDP per capita have slightly decreased in Mexico over the last sixteen years, when the richest and poorest 20% of regions are taken into account. With a productivity growth of 4.4% per year over the period 2010-16, Aguascalientes had the highest productivity growth and strongly converged towards the productivity level of Mexico City, the national frontier in terms of labour productivity (excluding Campeche). Tlaxcala recorded the lowest productivity growth of the country with -1% per year between 2010 and 2016 (excluding Campeche and Tabasco due to fluctuation of natural resource prices).
    [Show full text]
  • Tabasco Mexico
    JURISDICTIONAL SUSTAINABILITY PROFILE TABASCO MEXICO LOW-EMISSION RURAL VILLAHERMOSA DEVELOPMENT (LED-R) FOREST NO FOREST AT A GLANCE DEFORESTATION (1985-2014) • Original forest covers 3.4% of the state; few remaining natural forest areas are located in inaccessible flood- DRIVERS OF Large-scale agriculture prone areas DEFORESTATION Sources: Large-scale cattle ranching Socio-economic: INEGI, OECD Deforestation: Hansen et al./ • 14% of state categorized as protected areas, but suffer UMD/Google/USGS/NASA; post- Small-scale cattle ranching high levels of illegal logging, hunting, & fire processing by EII AVERAGE ANNUAL 0.70 Mt CO (2012-2014) 2 Deforestation Includes above-ground biomass • Increase in mangrove areas over the past 10 years due to EMISSIONS FROM GDP & below-ground biomass DEFORESTATION Average deforestation 523,613 communities’ use of wildlife conservation management 2 AREA 24,738 km 2 units (UMAs), promoted by national Secretary of MILLIONS MXN POPULATION 2,454,295 (2018) 0.75 Environment & Natural Resources (SEMARNAT) & National HDI 74.17 (2012) 400,000 Forestry Commission (CONAFOR) GDP USD 27.02 billion 0.50 (2016, Base year 2013) • Significant production of crude petroleum derived GINI 0.46 (2014) 200,000 from mangrove ecosystems, with cases of soil & water 0.25 MAIN ECONOMIC Extraction of non-renewable contamination & ecosystem disruption HUNDREDS OF Km ACTIVITIES resources 0.2 0.00 0.13 0.25 0.45 0.13 0.39 0.19 0.26 0.13 0.14 0.21 0.33 0.32 0.38 0.65 0.91 0 • One of Mexico’s main beef providers from the Trade 03 04 05
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico: State Law on Legitimation and Distinctions Between Children Born in and out of Wedlock
    Report for the Executive Office for Immigration Review LL Files Nos. 2017-014922 through 2017-014953 Mexico: State Law on Legitimation and Distinctions Between Children Born In and Out of Wedlock (Update) August 2017 The Law Library of Congress, Global Legal Research Center (202) 707-6462 (phone) • (866) 550-0442 (fax) • [email protected] • http://www.law.gov Contents Introduction .....................................................................................................................................1 Aguascalientes .................................................................................................................................2 Baja California .................................................................................................................................4 Baja California Sur ..........................................................................................................................6 Campeche .........................................................................................................................................8 Chiapas ...........................................................................................................................................10 Chihuahua ......................................................................................................................................12 Coahuila .........................................................................................................................................14 Colima ............................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Baja California Sur Tourism Cluster in Mexico
    MICROECONOMICS OF COMPETITIVENESS THE BAJA CALIFORNIA SUR TOURISM CLUSTER IN MEXICO Professor Michael E. Porter Professor Niels Ketelhöhn Mulegué Loreto Comondú Los Cabos municipality La Paz San Jose del Cabo Cabo Corridor Cabo San Lucas Daniel Acevedo (Mexico) Dionisio Garza Sada (Mexico) José Luis Romo (Mexico) Bernardo Vogel (Mexico) Boston, Massachusetts May 2nd, 2008 Profile of Mexico Mexico covers an area of 1,964,382 square kilometers (758,452 square miles). With a population of 105 million, Mexico is the 11th most populous country and the most populous Spanish-speaking country in the world. The nation’s capital, Mexico City, is the second largest city in the world. Mexico is composed by 31 states congregated in a federal representative democratic republic. The constitution establishes three levels of government: federal, state, and municipal. The federal government is constituted by the Legislative branch, composed by the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies, the Executive branch, headed by the President who is elected for a single term every six years by a direct national election and is also commander in chief of the military forces, and the Judicial branch, comprised by the Supreme Court.1 Recent Political and Economic Situation The economic policy from 1920 until the end of the 1980’s was based on a centralized economy driven by strong government intervention. During the 1950´s postwar years, Mexico pursued an economic development strategy of “stabilizing development” that relied on heavy public-sector investment to modernize the national economy. Concurrently, Mexican governments followed conservative policies on controlled interest and exchange rates that helped maintain low rates of inflation and attracted external capital to support industrialization.
    [Show full text]
  • Hidalgo County Historical Museum Archives
    Museum of South Texas History Archives Photo Collection Subject Index Inventory Headings List Revision: January 2016 Consult archivist for finding aids relating to photo collections, negatives, slides, stereographs, or exhibit images. HEADING KEY I. Places II. People III. Activity IV. Things The HEADING lists are normally referred to only by their Roman numeral. For example, II includes groups and organizations, and III includes events and occupations. Each of the four HEADING lists is in upper case arranged alphabetically. Occasionally, subheadings appear as italics or with underlining, such as I GOVT BUILDINGS Federal Linn Post Office. Infrequently sub- subheading may appear, indicated by another right margin shift. Beneath each HEADING, Subheading, or Sub-subheading are folder titles. KEY HEADINGS = All Caps Subheadings= Underlined Folder Title = Regular Capitalization A I. AERIAL Brownsville/Matamoros Edinburg/Pan American/HCHM Elsa/Edcouch Hidalgo La Blanca Linn McAllen Madero McAllen Mission/Sharyland Mexico Padre Island, South/Port Isabel Pharr Rio Grande City/Fort Ringgold San Antonio Weslaco I. AGRICULTURE/SUPPLIES/BUSINESSES/AGENCIES/SEED and FEED I. AIRBASES/AIRFIELDS/AIRPORTS Brownsville Harlingen McAllen (Miller) Mercedes Moore World War II Korea Screwworm/Agriculture/Medical Science Projects Reynosa San Benito I. ARCHEOLOGY SITES Boca Chica Shipwreck Mexico I. AUCTION HOUSES B I. BACKYARDS I. BAKERIES/ PANADERIAS I. BANDSTANDS/QIOSCOS/KIOSKS/PAVILIONS Edinburg Mexico Rio Grande City 2 I. BANKS/SAVINGS AND LOANS/CREDIT UNIONS/INSURANCE AGENCIES/ LOAN COMPANY Brownsville Edinburg Chapin Edinburg State First National First State (NBC) Groundbreaking Construction/Expansion Completion Openings Exterior Interior Elsa Harlingen Hidalgo City La Feria McAllen First National Bank First State McAllen State Texas Commerce Mercedes Mission Monterrey San Antonio San Benito San Juan I.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Back Pain in Residents of Comalcalco, Tabasco, Mexico: Prevalence and Associated Factors
    2010 iMedPub Journals ARCHIVES OF MEDICINE Vol. 2 No. 1:4 doi: 10.3823/054 Original Article Low back pain in residents of Comalcalco, Tabasco, Mexico: Prevalence and associated factors. Marco Antonio Zavala-González *, Rosario Correa-De la Cruz **, Alberto Popoca-Flores ***, Sergio Eduardo Posada-Arévalo** *Mexican Society of Public Health, A.C.; **Academic Division of Health Sciences, Juárez Autónoma University of Tabasco; ***General Hospital of Zona No. 2, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Tabasco Delegation. Correspondence: Marco Antonio Zavala González. Address: Calle principal de la alberca # 24, Col. Ingenio Santa Rosalía, H. Cárdenas, Tabasco, México, C.P. 86500. Tel.: +52(937)-126- 4197. e-mail: [email protected] Objective: Cross-sectional analytical study, to determine the prevalence of low back pain and its association with known risk factors, in users of the Mexican Institute of Social Security, in Comalcalco, Tabasco, Mexico. Material and methods: A multistage sample was taken, randomly selecting a medical center of six, and 100 of 420 selected medical center users. Respondents were chosen by convenience, gathering different variables: sociode- mographic, anthropometric, lifestyle, chronic degenerative diseases, and low back pain, by personal interviews and review of medical records. Descriptive statistics and odds ratio (p≤0.05) were estimated. Results: Prevalence of low back pain was observed in 63% beneficiaries. A significant association with occupation, age, sex, obesity, unhealthy habits and chronic degenerative diseases was found, concluding that the prevalence is high, and that risk factors identified in other areas are not applicable to this population. Introduction heavy machinery, exposure to intense vibrations, emotional and behav- ioral problems, abdominal pain, tiredness, odynophagia, rapid growth Low back pain has clinical, social and economical importance since it rate, tendon and quadriceps stiffness, study and work, previous episode is a public health problem that affects the population indiscriminately.
    [Show full text]
  • Tabasco Investment.Pdf
    INVESTMENTS 2020 USA and Canada Central and South America Logistic Tabasco reinforces its leadership in the Southeast region of México as the most efficient regional platform for logistics, distribution, commerce and services. Regional Distribution Centers have selected Tabasco as an Services 57 investment destination to establish their logistic center. Industry Commerce Industrial Parks with more than 9 4’000,000 m2 of available space. Source: Secretary for Economic Development and Competitivness,2018 and Development Economic for Secretary Source: Gross Domestic Product The Energy Hub of Mexico The Southeast region of Mexico, concentrates one 42 Billions USD of the most important economic activities: 73% 61% Oil & Gas 420 New Jobs for the next 30 years. Tabasco and Campeche Participation of the Oil Of the 9 tenders assigned by the represent the highest Industry in Tabasco´s National Hydrocarbons percentage of Gross Gross Domestic Product. Commission, Tabasco was awarded Domestic Product of 37 contracts for both, onshore and Mining. off shore activities (shallow y Deep water) as well as farmout projects. Source: Secretary of Energy, 2018 Energy, of Secretary Source: Foreign Investment 2019 Millions USD FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ON FIRST YEAR Tabasco State accumulate one of the FOR A NEW GOVERNMENT (2001-2019) biggest amount of foreign investment within the states of southeastern México. Tabasco * The foreign direct 491.6 investment of 2019 is taken from 491.6 MD January to 30% December. 323.9 37% Quintana Roo 30% Tabasco 231.6 15% Chiapas 179.6 9% Campeche 9% Yucatan In 2018, Tabasco was the preferred destination for attracting 2001 2007 2013 2019 foreign investment in the Southeast with 529.6 md.
    [Show full text]
  • Caso De Rabia Canina En El Poblado La Raya De Zaragoza, Tacotalpa,Tabasco
    CASO DE RABIA CANINA EN EL POBLADO LA RAYA DE ZARAGOZA, TACOTALPA,TABASCO MVZ. Diego Quiroga Iduarte La Paz, Baja California Sur a 7 de Julio de 2016 ANTECEDENTES LOGRO ESTATAL: • 26 años sin caso de rabia humana transmitida por perro, el último caso se presentó en 1989. • El estado de Tabasco había permanecido 21 años sin presentar casos de rabia canina, siendo el último caso en 1994. • 9 años sin caso de rabia humana transmitida por fauna silvestre (Murciélago), el último caso se presentó en un menor de edad del municipio de Comalcalco, Tab., en el año 2006. 2 El 28 de marzo del año en curso personal del Laboratorio Estatal de Salud Pública notifico vía telefónica a oficina central caso positivo al virus rábico en el encéfalo de un canino. 3 UBICACIÓN GOGRAFICA Pob. La Raya de Zaragoza. Municipio de Tacotalpa, Tabasco. 4 VIVIENDA DEL DUEÑO DEL PERRO POSITIVO A RABIA 5 • Antecedente del animal positivo a rabia. – Especie: canina – Raza: Criollo – Edad: 6 meses. – Propietaria: C. Ismaela Pérez Gómez. – Domicilio: Poblado La Raya de Zaragoza, calle Miguel Hidalgo. • Sin antecedente de vacuna antirrábica. • Residente habitual del Pob. La Raya de Zaragoza perteneciente al municipio de Tacotalpa, el 18 de marzo de 2016 agredió a 6 perros y fue sacrificado el día 22 del presente año por el epidemiólogo de la Jurisdicción Sanitaria de Tacotalpa. • La muestra fue enviada al LESP el mismo día del sacrifico, por el Dr. José Melchor Sanchez Pérez Epidemiólogo de la Jurisdicción Sanitaria No. 15 6 7 Las acciones de control de foco rábico se iniciaron el día 30 de marzo del 2016, llevándose a cabo las siguientes actividades: • Se realizo búsqueda intencionada de personas agredidas o que estuvieron en contacto con el animal positivo.
    [Show full text]
  • Peopling 19Th Century Mexico Ver. August 24, 1992 6-1
    Peopling 19th Century Mexico ver. August 24, 1992 6-1 The Peopling of 19th century Mexico: Critical scrutiny of a censured century* Published in: Statistical Abstract of Latin America, vol. 30 (1993): 603-633 Robert McCaa, [email protected] During the past five centuries, the Mexican people have undergone three enormous demographic transformations--holocaust in the sixteenth century, recuperation in the 17th and 18th, and transition, indeed demographic revolution in the twentieth. The nineteenth century, usually censured as embarrassingly stagnant, seemingly stands alone as a century of slow growth with few significant demographic developments.i Yet, while Mexico's caudillos and constitutionalists fought to rule the nation or defend against foreign attack, the peopling of Mexico advanced at a lively pace in the 19th century and, unlike other more rapidly growing countries in the Americas, grew solely by means of native stocks. Over four generations, from 1790, when the last colony-wide census was taken, to 1910, on the eve of a decade of violent revolution, the total population of Mexico increased more than three-fold, from 5 to more than 15 million inhabitants. Neither decades of political strife nor foreign invasions sufficed to stifle the vast demographic energy of nineteenth century Mexico. Paradójicamente, el problema más serio lo arrostra el investigador cuando desea perfeccionar el conocimiento de los mundos precolombino y colonial con una comprensión de la etapa formativa nacional, que tuvo como escenario el paisaje convulso del siglo XIX. Parece como si cayésemos en un vacío. Falta la documentación adecuada y la que hay no está expedita para su pronto empleo.ii --Gonzalo Aguirre Beltrán, 1946 The nineteenth century marked the apogee of the "many Mexicos", when central authority exercised hegemony only sporadically over the regions and rarely counted the populace.
    [Show full text]
  • Palenque and Selected Survey Sites in Chiapas and Tabasco: the Preclassic
    FAMSI © 2002: Robert L. Rands Palenque and Selected Survey Sites in Chiapas and Tabasco: The Preclassic Research Year: 1998 Culture: Maya Chronology: Pre-Classic Location: Chiapas and Tabasco, México Sites: Palenque, Trinidad, Zapatilla, Chinikiha, Paso Nuevo Table of Contents Abstract Resumen Introduction Trinidad Zapatillo (Nueva Esperanza) Chinikiha Paso Nuevo Palenque Methodology and Closing Comments Key to Illustrations Illustrations Sources Cited Abstract Archaeological research focused on the major Classic Maya site of Palenque included the occasional recovery of Preclassic remains at various survey sites in Chiapas and Tabasco. Preclassic ceramics at four of these, in addition to Palenque, are considered. The Middle Preclassic is well represented at all sites, a primary subdivision being the appearance of waxy wares. The non-waxy to waxy shift, recalling Xe-Mamom relationships, is more pronounced than changes marking the Middle to Late Preclassic transition. Initial Middle Preclassic similarities tend to be stronger outside the Maya Lowlands than with other Lowland Maya sites, and a few ceramics also have non-Maya Early Preclassic correspondences. Depending in part on the survey site under consideration, Olmec/Greater Isthmiam features and Chalchuapa-like treatments are noted. Usually, however, relationships are observed on a modal rather than typological level, perhaps reflecting the reworking of external influences from varied sources and the occasional retention of earlier features as archaisms. Resumen La investigación arqueológica enfocada en el mayor sitio Maya Clásico de Palenque incluye la recuperación ocasional de restos Preclásicos en varios sitios examinados en Chiapas y Tabasco. Las cerámicas del Preclásico de cuatro de estos sitios, en adición al de Palenque, son también consideradas.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico's Ten Most Iconic Endangered Species
    Alejandro Olivera Center for Biological Diversity, April 2018 Executive summary exico is one of the world’s most biologically rich nations, with diverse landscapes that are home to a treasure trove of wildlife, including plant and animal species found nowhere else. Sadly, in Mexico and Maround the world, species are becoming extinct because of human activities at rates never seen before. In this report we highlight the threats facing Mexico’s 10 most iconic endangered species to help illustrate the broader risks confronting the country’s imperiled plants and animals. These 10 species — which in most cases are protected only on paper — were chosen to reflect Mexico’s diversity of wildlife and ecosystems and the wide range of threats to the country’s biodiversity. New awareness of these unique animals and plants is critical to inspiring a nationwide demand to protect these critical components of Mexico’s natural heritage. Although the Mexican government began officially listing and protecting species as extinct, threatened, endangered, and “under special protection” in 1994 — more than 20 years ago — few species have actually recovered, and many critical threats continue unabated. In many cases, officials are failing to enforce crucial laws and regulations that would protect these species. Additionally, the Mexican government has not updated its official list of imperiled species, referred to as NOM059, since 2010, despite new and growing risks from climate change, habitat destruction, the wildlife trade and in some cases direct killing. This failure obscures the true plight of the nation’s endangered wildlife. The following 10 iconic endangered species are not adequately protected by the Mexican government: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Unhcr Presence in Mexico
    NEWSLETTER - NOVEMBER, 2020 UNHCR PRESENCE IN MEXICO School supply packages were donated to families in Chiapas, Tabasco, Oaxaca, Veracruz and Baja California. COVID RESPONSE – HIGHLIGHTS OPERATIONAL CONTEXT 80,000 kits with school supplies The decline in the number of confirmed and donated to families in Chiapas, suspected Covid-19 cases that began in August Tabasco, Oaxaca, Veracruz and Baja stopped by mid-September. Cases have once again California started to increase. Chihuahua, where many asylum seekers and refugee live, became the first state to 781 asylum-seekers released from return to “red” in the Covid-19 traffic light system migration detention under the after registering a rebound in Covid-19 cases. The Alternative to Detention program since National Asylum Commission (COMAR) has continued the beginning of pandemic (2,863 in registering new asylum applications in its offices, 2020) while the subsequent processing has been carried 14,169 individuals provided with out both in person and remotely. emergency cash assistance covering basic needs for 3 months With 32,260 asylum claims at the end of end of October 2020, asylum applications in Mexico 45,785 attended by national Help continued to rise, especially during the last two Desk through calls and messages months. This brings numbers closer to the levels seen immediately prior to the onset of Covid-19. 1 UNHCR PRESENCE IN MEXICO NEWSLETTER - NOVEMBER, 2020 UNHCR expects that approximately 44,000 asylum At the beginning of the new school year, UNHCR applications will be filed in 2020. The increase of distributed over 80,000 packages of school supplies asylum-seeking children indicates also that more to families in communities inhabited by refugees in families are on the move.
    [Show full text]