DOCSLIB.ORG

22.3.2019 A8-0205/240 Amendment 240 Peter Kouroumbashev, Angel Dzhambazki, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Filiz Hyusmenova, Iskra Mihaylova, Sv

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
22.3.2019 A8-0205/240 Amendment 240 Peter Kouroumbashev, Angel Dzhambazki, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Filiz Hyusmenova, Iskra Mihaylova, Sv 22.3.2019 A8-0205/240 Amendment 240 Peter Kouroumbashev, Angel Dzhambazki, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Filiz Hyusmenova, Iskra Mihaylova, Svetoslav Hristov Malinov, Emil Radev, Momchil Nekov, Maria Grapini, Dan Nica, Sergei Stanishev, Claudia Țapardel, Nedzhmi Ali, Andrey Kovatchev, Vladimir Urutchev, Eva Maydell, Asim Ademov, Georgi Pirinski, Deirdre Clune, Zigmantas Balčytis, Roberts Zīle, Kosma Złotowski, Edward Czesak, Bolesław G. Piecha, Anna Elżbieta Fotyga, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Ryszard Czarnecki, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Victor Boştinaru, Emilian Pavel, Răzvan Popa, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Adam Gierek, Maria Gabriela Zoană, Doru-Claudian Frunzulică, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Claudiu Ciprian Tănăsescu, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Andi Cristea, Renate Weber, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Siegfried Mureşan, Damian Drăghici, István Ujhelyi, Norica Nicolai, Andrey Novakov, Cătălin Sorin Ivan, Csaba Sógor Report A8-0205/2018 Wim van de Camp Daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and rest periods and positioning by means of tachographs (COM(2017)0277 – C8-0167/2017 – 2017/0122(COD)) Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (1) Good working conditions for (1) Good working conditions for drivers and fair business conditions for drivers are of paramount importance to road transport undertakings are of creating a safe and efficient road transport paramount importance to creating a safe, sector. To facilitate that process it is efficient and socially accountable road important that the Union social rules in transport sector. To facilitate that process it road transport are clear, fit for purpose, is essential that the Union social rules in easy to apply and implemented in an road transport are clear, fit for purpose, effective and consistent manner throughout easy to apply and to enforce and the Union. implemented in an effective and consistent manner throughout the Union. Or. bg AM\1180601EN.docx PE621.703v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 22.3.2019 A8-0205/241 Amendment 241 Peter Kouroumbashev, Angel Dzhambazki, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Filiz Hyusmenova, Iskra Mihaylova, Svetoslav Hristov Malinov, Emil Radev, Momchil Nekov, Maria Grapini, Dan Nica, Sergei Stanishev, Claudia Țapardel, Nedzhmi Ali, Andrey Kovatchev, Vladimir Urutchev, Eva Maydell, Asim Ademov, Georgi Pirinski, Deirdre Clune, Zigmantas Balčytis, Roberts Zīle, Kosma Złotowski, Edward Czesak, Bolesław G. Piecha, Anna Elżbieta Fotyga, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Ryszard Czarnecki, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Victor Boştinaru, Emilian Pavel, Răzvan Popa, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Adam Gierek, Maria Gabriela Zoană, Doru-Claudian Frunzulică, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Claudiu Ciprian Tănăsescu, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Andi Cristea, Renate Weber, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Siegfried Mureşan, Damian Drăghici, István Ujhelyi, Norica Nicolai, Andrey Novakov, Cătălin Sorin Ivan, Csaba Sógor Report A8-0205/2018 Wim van de Camp Daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and rest periods and positioning by means of tachographs (COM(2017)0277 – C8-0167/2017 – 2017/0122(COD)) Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (2) Having evaluated the effectiveness (2) Having evaluated the effectiveness and efficiency of the implementation of the and efficiency of the implementation of the existing set of Union social rules in road existing set of Union social rules in road transport, and in particular Regulation (EC) transport, and in particular Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council9, certain deficiencies and of the Council9, certain deficiencies were identified in the existing legal were identified in the existing legal framework. Unclear and unsuitable rules framework. on weekly rest, resting facilities, breaks in multi-manning and the absence of rules on the return of drivers to their home, lead to diverging interpretations and enforcement practices in the Member States. Several Member States recently adopted unilateral measures further increasing legal uncertainty and unequal treatment of drivers and operators. _________________ _________________ 9 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the 9 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of European Parliament and of the Council of AM\1180601EN.docx PE621.703v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 (OJ L 102, Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 (OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1). 11.4.2006, p. 1). Or. bg AM\1180601EN.docx PE621.703v01-00 EN United in diversityEN.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Parliament: 7Th February 2017 Redistribution of Political Balance
    POLICY PAPER European issues n°420 European Parliament: 7th February 2017 redistribution of political balance Charles de Marcilly François Frigot At the mid-term of the 8th legislature, the European Parliament, in office since the elections of May 2014, is implementing a traditional “distribution” of posts of responsibility. Article 19 of the internal regulation stipulates that the Chairs of the parliamentary committees, the Deputy-Chairs, as well as the questeurs, hold their mandates for a renewable 2 and a-half year period. Moreover, internal elections within the political groups have supported their Chairs, whilst we note that there has been some slight rebalancing in terms of the coordinators’ posts. Although Italian citizens draw specific attention with the two main candidates in the battle for the top post, we should note other appointments if we are to understand the careful balance between nationalities, political groups and individual experience of the European members of Parliament. A TUMULTUOUS PRESIDENTIAL provide collective impetus to potential hesitations on the part of the Member States. In spite of the victory of the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European elections, it supported Martin As a result the election of the new President of Schulz in July 2104 who stood for a second mandate as Parliament was a lively[1] affair: the EPP candidate – President of the Parliament. In all, with the support of the Antonio Tajani – and S&D Gianni Pittella were running Liberals (ADLE), Martin Schulz won 409 votes following neck and neck in the fourth round of the relative an agreement concluded by the “grand coalition” after majority of the votes cast[2].
    [Show full text]
  • Votes of 29 June 2020
    Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Results of roll-call votes of 29 June 2020 Table of Contents 1. CORRIGENDUM to Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources; (OJ L 328, 21 12 2018, p. 82) (position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 13 November 2018 with a view to the adoption of the above directive; (P8_TA(2018)0444)) (COM(2016)0767 – C8-0500/2016 – 2016/0382(COD)) - Adoption of corrigendum................................................................................................ 2 2. Establishing the Just Transition Fund - 2020/0006(COD) - Rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek ............................. 3 2.1 Vote on the compromise amendment CA2b .................................................................................. 3 2.2 Adoption of draft opinion ............................................................................................................... 4 3. A comprehensive European approach to energy storage - 2019/2189(INI) - Rapporteur: Claudia Gamon - Adoption of draft report .................................................................................................................. 5 Key to symbols: + (in favour), - (against), 0 (abstention). 1. CORRIGENDUM to Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources; (OJ L 328, 21 12 2018, p. 82) (position of the European Parliament adopted
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • European Alliance for a Green Recovery
    Launch of the European alliance for a Green Recovery Press Release Under embargo until 14/04 7:00am At the initiative of Pascal Canfin, Chair of the Environment Committee at the European Parliament, 180 political decision-makers, business leaders, trade unions, NGOs, and think tanks have come together to form a European alliance for a Green Recovery. In the face of the coronavirus crisis, the biggest challenge Europe has faced in peacetime, with devastating consequences and a shock to the economy tougher than the 2008 crisis, Ministers from 11 countries, 79 cross-party MEPs from 17 Member States, 37 CEOs, 28 business associations representing 10 different sectors, trade union confederation representing members from 90 national trade union organisations and 10 trade union federations, 7 NGOs and 6 think tanks, have committed to working together to create, support and implement solutions to prepare our economies for the world of tomorrow. This first pan-European call for mobilisation on post-crisis green investment packages will work to build the recovery and transformation plans which enshrine the fight against climate change and biodiversity as a key pillar of the economic strategy. Sharing the belief that the economic recovery will only come with massive investments to protect and create jobs and to support all companies, regions and sectors that have suffered from the economy coming to a sudden halt, the alliance commits to contribute to the post-crisis investment decisions needed to reboot and reboost our economy. Covid-19 will not make climate change and nature degradation go away. The fight against this crisis will not be won without a solid economic response.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Balkans in 2020: the Year of Action and Decisions
    WESTERN BALKANS IN 2020: THE YEAR OF ACTION AND DECISIONS Friday, 20 March 2020 10:00 - 15:00 , National Palace of Culture (Hall 8), Sofia, Bulgaria ABOUT THE EVENT 2020 will be pivotal for the enlargement and the engagement with the Western Balkans countries and their perspective within the European Union. European prosperity and security is closely linked to the integration process and the advancement of peace, democracy, respect for human rights and rule of law in the Western Balkans region and their future in a strong and reformed EU. The Western Balkans, racked by war and tragedies throughout the 1990s, has recently seen a surge of significant political, social and economic progress. Yet the need for reforms and transformation is still crucial. We should not forget the fact that after a long stretch of ethnic instability, the region needs an accelerated pace of reforms to help countries moving towards the EU. The new methodology proposed by the EU commission should reassess and inject new dynamism into the enlargement process and provide a new impetus for the transformation of accession countries. EVENT SCHEDULE Friday, 20 March 2020 09:30 Arrival of participants and registration 10:00 - 10:30 Opening remarks: Ilhan Kyuchyuk MEP, Vice President of ALDE Party Jurgen Martens MP, President of European Liberal Forum Mustafa Karadayi MP, Chairman of MRF 10:30 - 12:00 Getting it Right: Towards a positive decision with a renewed accession process? Chaired by Ilhan Kyuchyuk MEP, Vice President of ALDE Party H.E. Nikola Dimitrov, Minister of Foreign Affairs of North Macedonia H.E.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Made Simple
    THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT MADE SIMPLE 2014-2019 The European Parliament Made Simple is produced by the American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) as a introduction to the workings of the European Parliament for amateurs and experts alike. Production Team Editor and project manager Giovanni Mastrobuono Senior Communications Officer Editorial assistance Alexandrine Gauvin Communications Officer Eli Corso-Phinney Communications Intern The information contained in this publication has been compiled in good faith and is accurate according to the most recent sources available at the time of going to press. Photographs used with the kind permission of the Audiovisual Libraries of the European Commission, Council of the European Union and the European Parliament. First edition, 2014 ISBN: 978-2-9146856-7-2 Printed in Belgium American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) Avenue des Arts 53, B-1000 Brussels Telephone: +32 (0)2 513 68 92 Fax: +32 (0)2 513 79 28 [email protected] www.amchameu.eu Foreword Susan Danger Managing Director American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union t is with great pleasure that I present AmCham EU’s newest guide, The European Parliament Made Simple. The Lisbon Treaty, signed in 2009, gave the European Parliament greater power in EU Idecision-making and an increased role in selecting and approving the European Commission. As a result, this year’s European election has a greater democratic influence than ever before. With this in mind, AmCham EU has published The European Parliament Made Simple to explain the Parliament’s expanded powers and roles, for both the Brussels policy community and public affairs professionals in the EU and US.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms Ursula Von Der Leyen, President of the European Commission European Commission Rue De La Loi/Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels
    Ms Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission European Commission Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels Mr Charles Michel, President of the European Council European Commission Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 1049 Brussels Brussels, 27 July 2020 Dear President von der Leyen, Dear President Michel, With this letter, we would like to draw your attention to the Polish government’s expressed intent to withdraw from the Istanbul Convention on fighting domestic violence. This latest development shows that we can never take women’s rights for granted. This is disrespectful, a clear violation of women’s rights and unacceptable. The signal the Polish government is sending is a highly troubling one in times that are already challenging for women. Women have been hit disproportionally hard by the Covid-19 crisis and face an increase in cases of domestic violence. The European Union is founded upon shared values that are enshrined in our Treaties, amongst them equality between men and women. We cannot regress on these core values stipulated in Article 2 TEU. We should never accept it when one of our Member States backtracks from equality. That is why we call on you, as the President of the European Commission, guardian of the treaties, and as the President of the European Council, to do everything within your power to discourage the Polish government from taking this misstep. Madam President, in your political guidelines, you made the commitment that the EU’s accession to the Istanbul Convention is a key priority for the Commission and that if the accession remains blocked in the Council, you would consider tabling proposals on minimum standards regarding the definition of certain types of violence, and strengthening the Victims’ Rights Directive.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Josep Borrell Fontelles HR / VP of the European Commission [email protected] [email protected]
    Mr Josep Borrell Fontelles HR / VP of the European Commission [email protected] [email protected] Brussels, 13 May 2020 Dear High Representative and Vice-President Borrell, Censorship of the joint Op-Ed marking the 45th anniversary of EU–China relations on May 6 in the China Daily With this letter we would like to express our concerns about the way in which the EEAS is engaging with its Chinese counterparts and dealing with diplomatic pressure from Chinese official authorities. During our last exchange of views in the AFET Committee on April 30, you firmly reassured the Members of the Parliament that the EU would never bow to pressure coming from Chinese channels to censor our publications. Regrettably, we must however conclude that one week later the EEAS did exactly do that by watering down a joint Op-Ed marking the 45th anniversary of EU–China relations. After pressure from Chinese authorities, the Op-Ed was published on the 6th of May in the China Daily without the reference to the origins of the coronavirus. You will agree with us, that it is most unfortunate that this happened just few days following the World Press Freedom Day on the 3rd of May. The EEAS press release on May 8 attempts to justify the decision to proceed with the censored publication on the ground of the necessity to reach out to the wider Chinese public by passing key messages on a number of priority areas. We certainly recognise the strategical importance of engaging with China and its people.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Motion for a Resolution
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0357/2021 8.6.2021 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law pursuant to Rule 144 of the Rules of Procedure on the situation in Sri Lanka, in particular the arrests under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (2021/2748(RSP)) Svenja Hahn, Petras Auštrevičius, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Dita Charanzová, Olivier Chastel, Vlad Gheorghe, Klemen Grošelj, Bernard Guetta, Karin Karlsbro, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Karen Melchior, Javier Nart, Frédérique Ries, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Ramona Strugariu, Dragoş Tudorache, Hilde Vautmans on behalf of the Renew Group RE\P9_B(2021)0357_EN.docx PE694.467v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B9-0357/2021 European Parliament resolution on the situation in Sri Lanka, in particular the arrests under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (2021/2748(RSP)) The European Parliament, having regard to Regulation No. 01 of 2021 published on the 12th of March 2021 under Sri Lanka’s Prevention of Terrorism Act; having regard to Sri Lanka’s Government regulation No. 2 of 2021 under Prevention of Terrorism Act, published on the 13th of April 2021 banning eleven organizations on national security grounds; having regard to the Report of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights of the 27th of January 2021 “Promotion reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka”1; having regard to the restoration of Sri Lanka’s enhanced GSP+ status on 19 May 2017 which provides additional
    [Show full text]
  • PMC 056 Manual PE
    Przeczytaj i działaj! Na wstępie kilka słów wyjaśnienia. Projekt ten powstał bo są jeszcze osoby, które mają dość czekania. Czekania na spełnienie obietnic, także tych przed- wyborczych. Czekania i liczenia na to, aż ktoś coś zrobi dla pokrzywdzonych. Czekania na jakąkolwiek, sensowną, a nie propagandową inicjatywę mianowa- nych i samozwańczych reprezentantów pokrzywdzonych, którzy do tej pory ta- kiej inicjatywy nie podjęli. Oni, z sobie tylko znanych powodów, mogą czekać i zwlekać. My nie możemy! Co trzeba zrobić? Coś bardzo prostego. Wysłać e-maile do europosłów. Ale nie do wszystkich. E-maile wysyłamy tylko do szefów i kierownictw grup w Parla- mencie Europejskim. Także do grupy, w której znajdują się osoby odpowie- dzialne za kradzież świadczeń. Dlaczego? Bo mimo licznych, przedwyborczych haseł i zapowiedzi kandydatów Koalicji Europejskiej, europosłowie spoza Polski niczego nie wiedzą o tym, co wydarzyło się 16 grudnia 2016 roku, o przyczy- nach i skutkach tego wydarzenia, o wzajemnym związku grudniowej ustawy z bieżącą sytuacją w polskim sądownictwie Dlatego jako adresatów pomijamy polskich europosłów. Tych z PiS-u, z wiadomych przyczyn. Pozostałych dlatego, że wiedzą, ale skoro do tej pory nie podzielili się tą wiedzą z kolegami z macie- rzystej grupy, nie zrobią tego nawet po przeczytaniu dziesiątek takich czy po- dobnych e-maili. Oni na swoich zapracowanych głowach mają o wiele ważniej- sze sprawy niż - za przeproszeniem - jacyś tam emeryci z podejrzaną, PRL- owską przeszłością, potrzebni tylko w okresie wyborczym. Poniżej znajdziesz wszystko, czego potrzebujesz do działania. Doceń wysiłek włożony w przeszukiwanie Internetu, w celu pozyskania potrzebnych informa- cji, w opracowanie tekstu. Doceń to, że wyłożono własne, skromne środki na angielskie tłumaczenie.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 Is Awarded Background Briefing in the Next 10 Days, the Nominations of the Sakharov
    1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 is awarded Background briefing In the next 10 days, the nominations of the Sakharov Prize for Human Rights will be decided by the European Parliament. The prize is awarded to “honour exceptional individuals who combat intolerance, fanaticism and oppression.”1 Previous winners include Nelson Mandela, Reporters without Borders and Anatoli Marchenko. If you believe that Azerbaijani human rights defenders – who are now in jail following years of work on behalf of the rights of others, and most recently on a list of political prisoners in Azerbaijan (on which they are now included) – then let the MEPs who vote on this know. Nominations for the Sakharov Prize can be made by: Political groups in the European Parliament. Or At least 40 MEPs. The deadline for nominations is Thursday 18 September at 12:00 in Strasbourg. NOTE: In order to decide on a nominee from their group some political groups have internal deadlines in the course of the next week. The next days are crucial. We focus here on four important political groups which might to support this nomination: The EPP Social Democrats Liberals Greens 1Source: The European Union website: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/aboutparliament/en/00f3dd2249/Sakharov-Prize-for-Freedom-of-Thought.html 2 Once the nominations are been made, the Foreign Affairs and Development committees vote on a shortlist of three finalists. This happens on either Monday 6th or Tuesday 7th October 2014. The members list for the foreign affairs committee can be found here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/afet/members.html, while the development committee is here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/deve/members.html#menuzone.
    [Show full text]